Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACTIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,261 records · Page 70Linked to original sources

The life cycle of actin patches in mating yeast.

Actin patches are core components of the yeast actin cytoskeleton that undergo redistribution during establishment of cell polarity. Using 4D imaging, we observe the life cycle of actin patches in living yeast for the first time. We observe assembly of actin patches at sites of polarized growth, and disassembly of actin patches concomitant with movement away from those sites. The total lifetime of an actin patch is 10.9+/-4.2 seconds. These findings indicate that actin patches are labile structures, and that the localization of actin patches during establishment of cell polarity occurs by assembly of these structures at sites of polarized cell surface growth. These findings were confirmed and extended by analysis of myosin I proteins and their receptor, verprolin, proteins implicated in actin assembly in yeast. Deletion of type I myosins or their receptor has no effect on the velocity of actin patch movement. However, these mutants show a 65% reduction in number of patch movements and a three-fold increase in patch lifetime. Finally, the actin patch resident proteins Abp1p, fimbrin, and Arp2p show normal association with actin patches in myosin I and verprolin mutants. However, cofilin accumulates in abnormal 'bars' of G-actin in myo3Delta,myo5Delta and vrp1Delta strains, and Las17p/Bee1p is not associated with actin patches in vrp1Delta strains. These findings imply a multi-step process for actin patch assembly. Early events in this process, including assembly of Abp1p, fimbrin and Arp2p with F-actin, can occur throughout the cell and do not require myosin I proteins or their receptor. Later events in this process are myosin I-dependent, and are required for assembly of actin patches at sites of polarized cell surface growth.

Actins↗

A green fluorescent protein-actin fusion protein dominantly inhibits cytokinesis, cell spreading, and locomotion in Dictyostelium.

We transformed Dictyostelium discoideum cells by a vector for expression of a chimerical fusion protein consisting of Aequorea Victoria green fluorescent protein (GFP) and D. discoideum actin at its amino- and carboxy-terminal, respectively. The amount of expressed GFP-actin was about 3% of total actin molecules in the transformed cells. The expression of GFP-actin in D. discoideum completely inhibited cytokinesis in suspension culture. The expression decreased the rate of random cell locomotion to about a half of that of control cells. The expression also caused the cells to round up. These phenotypic observations suggested that GFP-actin acts as a dominant negative form of actin in the cells. The rounding up by expression of GFP-actin was suppressed by genetical elimination of myosin II heavy chain. This result suggested that myosin II is necessary for the rounding up of GFP-actin expressing cells. GFP-actin constructed cortical actin filament architectures together with intrinsic actin in the cells. Purified GFP-actin polymerized and de-polymerized repetitively according to the solution conditions in vitro. The critical concentration of GFP-actin for polymerization is the same as that of actin. The GFP-actin filaments was able to bind to coverglass surfaces coated with myosin head fragments. However, the GFP-actin filaments did not slide at all on the coverglass by addition of ATP. This indicates that the GFP-actin filaments form rigor complex with myosin II in vitro even in the presence of ATP. The formation of rigor complex may cause the cells to round up.

Actins↗

Glycolytic enzyme interactions with yeast and skeletal muscle F-actin.

Interaction of glycolytic enzymes with F-actin is suggested to be a mechanism for compartmentation of the glycolytic pathway. Earlier work demonstrates that muscle F-actin strongly binds glycolytic enzymes, allowing for the general conclusion that "actin binds enzymes", which may be a generalized phenomenon. By taking actin from a lower form, such as yeast, which is more deviant from muscle actin than other higher animal forms, the generality of glycolytic enzyme interactions with actin and the cytoskeleton can be tested and compared with higher eukaryotes, e.g., rabbit muscle. Cosedimentation of rabbit skeletal muscle and yeast F-actin with muscle fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (aldolase) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) followed by Scatchard analysis revealed a biphasic binding, indicating high- and low-affinity domains. Muscle aldolase and GAPDH showed low-affinity for binding yeast F-actin, presumably because of fewer acidic residues at the N-terminus of yeast actin; this difference in affinity is also seen in Brownian dynamics computer simulations. Yeast GAPDH and aldolase showed low-affinity binding to yeast actin, which suggests that actin-glycolytic enzyme interactions may also occur in yeast although with lower affinity than in higher eukaryotes. The cosedimentation results were supported by viscometry results that revealed significant cross-linking at lower concentrations of rabbit muscle enzymes than yeast enzymes. Brownian dynamics simulations of yeast and muscle aldolase and GAPDH with yeast and muscle actin compared the relative association free energy. Yeast aldolase did not specifically bind to either yeast or muscle actin. Yeast GAPDH did bind to yeast actin although with a much lower affinity than when binding muscle actin. The binding of yeast enzymes to yeast actin was much less site specific and showed much lower affinities than in the case with muscle enzymes and muscle actin.

Actins↗

Microfilament actin remodeling as a potential target for cancer drug development.

Actin was first identified in non-muscle cells only about three decades ago, and at about the same time, it was found that actin filaments were disrupted in the malignant transformed cells. The actin network is a rather complex, yet important structural and functional system of all eukaryotic cells. Actin filaments provide the basic infrastructure for maintaining cell morphology and functions such as adhesion, motility, exocytosis, endocytosis, and cell division. Growing evidence from this laboratory and others shows that alterations of actin polymerization, or actin remodeling, plays a pivotal role in regulating the morphologic and phenotypic events of a malignant cell. Actin remodeling is the result of activation of oncogenic actin signaling pathways (e.g., Ras and Src), or inactivation of several important actin-binding proteins that have tumor suppressor functions (e.g., gelsolin). Distinctive protein expression patterns of some of these genes in cancer and progressive carcinogenic processes have been observed. It has become evident that actin dynamics are regulated by a complex interplay of the small GTPase proteins of Ras superfamily Rac, Rho, and Cdc42, and efforts to develop specific inhibitors for these small G proteins as anticancer drug are underway. In this review we will discuss how actin remodeling is altered in the malignant transformation process, the functional significance of actin alteration in association with malignant phenotypes, and the approaches of targeting actin remodeling for chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic drug development. Approaches including using nature products directly modulating actin polymerization, using inhibitors of actin pathway small G proteins, and using gene-augmentation for actin binding proteins will be discussed. In addition, the concept of using F/G-actin ratio as a surrogate marker for actin-pathway based therapy will also be introduced.

Actins↗

[Caldesmon inhibits formation of strongly bound myosin cross-bridges and activates an ability of weakly bound cross-bridges to transform actin monomers to the off-conformation].

The effect of caldesmon and its actin-binding C-terminal 35 kDa fragment on conformational alterations of actin in a muscle fiber at relaxation, rigor and at simulation of strong and weak binding of myosin heads to actin was studied by polarizational fluorimetry technique. The strong and weak binding forms were mimicked during binding of F-actin of ghost muscle fibers to myosin subfragment-1 modified with NEM (NEM-S1) or pPDM (pPDM-S1), respectively. As a test for alterations in actin conformation, changes in orientation and mobility of a fluorescent probe, TRITC-phalloidin, bound specifically to F-actin were used. The results obtained have shown that during transition of the muscle fiber from the relaxed state into the rigor and during binding of actin filaments to NEM-S1, changes of polarization parameters take place, which are characteristic of formation between actin and myosin of the strong binding and of transformation of actin subunits from the "turned-off" (inactive) to the "turned-on" (active) conformation. Binding of pPDM-S1 to actin and relaxation of the muscle fiber are accompanied, on the contrary, by the changes of orientation and of the fluorescent probe mobility, which are typical of formation of the weak ("non-force-producing") form of actin-myosin binding and of transformation of actin subunits from the active conformation into the inactive one. Caldesmon and its C-terminal fragment markedly inhibit formation of the strong binding at rigor and activate transition of actin monomers to the switched off conformation at relaxation of muscle fiber. In parallel experiments, these regulatory proteins have been shown to inhibit an active force developed at the transition of a muscle fiber from relaxation to rigor. Besides, caldesmon and its fragment decrease the rate of actin filament sliding over myosin in an in vitro motility assay. Caldesmon is suggested to regulate the smooth muscle contraction in an allosterical manner. The alterations in actin conformation inhibit formation of strong binding of myosin cross bridges to actin and activate the ability of weakly bound cross bridges to switch actin monomers from the "on" to the "off" conformation.

Actins↗

Characterization of cytoplasmic actin isolated from Acanthamoeba castellanii by a new method.

Cytoplasmic actin has been isolated from Acanthamoeba castellanii by a new method, employing chromatography on DEAE-cellulose, that improves the yield by more than 20-fold over the previously reported method. This procedure should be particularly useful for isolating actin from cells in which it is present in relatively low concentration because the method does not depend initially on the polymerization of actin or its interaction with myosin. Systematic comparison of the properties of purified Acanthamoeba actin and rabbit skeletal muscle actin shows them to be similar in many ways: viscosity of F-actin, stoichiometry of bound nucleotide, stoichiometry of binding of muscle heavy meromyosin and myosin subfragment 1 in the absence of ATP, and ability to inhibit the KATPase activity of heavy meromyosin. The amino acid compositions of Acanthamoeba and muscle actin are also quite similar, but significant differences, especially the presence of epsilon-N-methyllysines in Acanthamoeba actin, have been confirmed. In addition to this structural difference, we find that Acanthamoeba actin is only one-third as effective as muscle actin as an activator of the MgATPase of muscle heavy meromyosin and subfragment 1. For Acanthamoeba actin, as for muscle actin, this activation exhibits hyperbolic dependence on actin concentration; i.e. the double reciprocal plot of ATPase activation versus actin concentration is linear. From these plots we find that the two actins give the same extrapolated ATPase activity at infinite actin concentration (Vmax) but differ by a factor of three in the concentration of actin needed to produce half-maximal activation (Kapp).

Actins↗

A DNase I binding/immunoprecipitation assay for actin.

An actin assay which employs the competition between labeled and unlabeled rabbit skeletal muscle actin for DNase I has been developed. Iodination of actin by the method of Bolton and Hunter results in the incorporation of approximately 0.5 mol of 125-iodine/incorporation of approximately 0.5 mol of 125-iodine/mol of actin. This 125I-actin retained the ability to bind to DNase I and inhibit enzymatic activity. The 125I-actin-DNase complex can be precipitated by the addition of a monospecific rabbit antibody to DNase I. The efficiency of this immunoprecipitation step is improved by the use of a second sheep anti-rabbit gamma-globulin. Using this immunoprecipitation assay, there is a linear displacement of the DNase I-bound 125I-actin by rabbit skeletal muscle actin standards or by the actin present in tissue and cell extracts. Using 17.5 ng of DNase I and approximately 500 pg of 125I-actin, 50% inhibition of binding was obtained with 23 ng of unlabeled actin. Reducing the amount of DNase I to 2 ng results in 50% inhibition of binding with 4 ng of unlabeled actin and an increase in the estimated sensitivity of the assay from 1.7 to 0.24 ng. The slopes of the displacement curves generated with both vertebrate and invertebrate non-muscle actins are parallel to rabbit skeletal muscle actin. This observation indicates approximately equal actin-DNase I binding affinities and suggests a high degree of conservation of the actin-DNase I binding site. The assay is useful for measuring the pools of F- and G-actin in a wide range of cells.

Actins↗

An actin-modulating protein from Physarum polycephalum. I. Isolation and purification.

High-speed centrifugation supernatants from slime mould plasmodia show considerable activities to inhibit the polymerization of actin as revealed by viscosity measurements. By following increasing inhibitory activities an actin modulating protein (AM-protein) has been isolated and purified which affects the polymer state of actin. AM-protein has a peptide chain weight of 42 000 and is thus indistinguishable from actin by SDS-electrophoresis, but can be clearly distinguished by isoelectric focussing. Peptide maps from partial proteolytic digests of AM-protein and Physarum actin reveal no similarities thereby excluding that AM-protein is a denatured or modified form of actin. The protein is isolated from crude extracts as a heterodimer with actin to which it strongly binds. This heterodimer affects the polymerization of large amounts of actin by inducing oligomeric or low-polymer actin complexes and thus inhibiting the formation of long actin filaments. The AM-protein/actin heterodimer has only a slight effect of F-actin. It partially depolymerized F-actin within several hours. By ion exchange chromatography in 8 M urea the AM-protein is separated from the actin. The purified AM-protein monomer is renatured and inhibits the polymerization of actin like the heterodimer but additionally, depolymerizes actin filaments very rapidly and effectively by breaking them into oligomer or low-polymer complexes. The addition of less than 1% AM-protein causes a decrease of the specific viscosity of an F-actin solution by 50%. The degree of polymerization inhibition and depolymerization of actin is strictly dependent on the amount of AM-protein added; therefore a catalytic type of reaction between both proteins can be excluded.

Actins↗

Isolation and characterization of covalently cross-linked actin dimer.

Covalently cross-linked actin dimer was isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle F-actin reacted with phenylenebismaleimide (Knight, P., and Offer, G. (1978) Biochem. J. 175, 1023-1032). The UV spectrum of the purified cross-linked actin dimer, in a nonpolymerizing buffer, was very similar to that of native F-actin and not to the spectrum of G-actin. Cross-linked actin dimer polymerized to filaments that were indistinguishable in the electron microscope from F-actin made from native G-actin and that were similar to native F-actin in their ability to activate the Mg2+-ATPase of myosin subfragment-1. The critical concentrations of polymerization of cross-linked actin dimer in 0.5 mM and 2.0 mM MgCl2, 2 to 4 microM, and 1 to 2 microM, respectively, were similar to the values for native G-actin. Cross-linked actin dimer contained 2 mol of bound nucleotide/mol of dimer. One bound nucleotide exchanged with ATP in solution with a t 1/2 of 55 min and with ADP with a t 1/2 of 5 h. The second bound nucleotide exchanged much more slowly. The more rapidly exchangeable site contained 10 to 15% bound ADP.Pi and 85 to 90% bound ATP while the second site contained much less, if any, bound ADP.Pi. Cross-linked actin dimer had an ATPase activity in 0.5 mM MgCl2 that was 7 times greater than the ATPase activity of native G-actin and that was also stimulated by cytochalasin D. These data are discussed in relation to the possible role of ATP in actin polymerization and function with the speculation that the cross-linked actin dimer may serve simultaneously as a useful model for each of the two different ends of native F-actin.

Actins↗

Comparison of filamin A-induced cross-linking and Arp2/3 complex-mediated branching on the mechanics of actin filaments.

We compared the effects of human filamin A (FLNa) and the activated human Arp2/3 complex on mechanical properties of actin filaments. As little as 1 FLNa to 800 polymerizing actin monomers induces a sharp concentration-dependent increase in the apparent viscosity of 24 microm actin, a parameter classically defined as a gel point. The activated Arp2/3 complex, at concentrations up to 1:25 actins had no detectable actin gelation activity, even in the presence of phalloidin, to stabilize actin filaments against debranching. Increasing the activated Arp2/3 complex to actin ratio raises the FLNa concentration required to induce actin gelation, an effect ascribable to Arp2/3-mediated actin nucleation resulting in actin filament length diminution. Time lapse video microscopy of microparticles attached to actin filaments or photoactivation of fluorescence revealed actin filament immobilization by FLNa in contrast to diffusion of Arp2/3-branched actin filaments. The experimental results support theories predicting that polymer branching absent cross-linking does not lead to polymer gelation and are consistent with the observation that cells deficient in actin filament cross-linking activity have unstable surfaces. They suggest complementary roles for actin branching and cross-linking in cellular actin mechanics in vivo.

Actin-Related Protein 2↗

Filament assembly from profilin-actin.

Profilin plays a major role in the assembly of actin filament at the barbed ends. The thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for barbed end assembly from profilin-actin have been measured turbidimetrically. Filament growth from profilin-actin requires MgATP to be bound to actin. No assembly is observed from profilin-CaATP-actin. The rate constant for association of profilin-actin to barbed ends is 30% lower than that of actin, and the critical concentration for F-actin assembly from profilin-actin units is 0.3 microM under physiological ionic conditions. Barbed ends grow from profilin-actin with an ADP-Pi cap. Profilin does not cap the barbed ends and is not detectably incorporated into filaments. The EDC-cross-linked profilin-actin complex (PAcov) both copolymerizes with F-actin and undergoes spontaneous self-assembly, following a nucleation-growth process characterized by a critical concentration of 0.2 microM under physiological conditions. The PAcov polymer is a helical filament that displays the same diffraction pattern as F-actin, with layer lines at 6 and 36 nm. The PAcov filaments bound phalloidin with the same kinetics as F-actin, bound myosin subfragment-1, and supported actin-activated ATPase of myosin subfragment-1, but they did not translocate in vitro along myosin-coated glass surfaces. These results are discussed in light of the current models of actin structure.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Vacuolar H+-ATPase binding to microfilaments: regulation in response to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity and detailed characterization of the actin-binding site in subunit B.

Vacuolar H(+)-ATPase (V-ATPase) binds microfilaments, and that interaction may be mediated by an actin binding domain in subunit B of the enzyme. To test for possible physiologic functions of the actin binding activity of V-ATPase, early responses of resorbing osteoclasts to inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity by wortmannin and LY294002 were examined. Rapid co-localization between V-ATPase and F-actin was demonstrated by immunocytochemistry, and corresponding association between V-ATPase and F-actin in immunoprecipitations and pelleting assays was detected. This response was reversed as osteoclasts recovered resorptive activity after inhibitors were removed. By expressing and characterizing fusion proteins containing segments of the actin-binding amino-terminal regions of the B subunits of V-ATPase, we mapped the actin-binding site to a 44-amino acid domain. An 11-amino acid segment with a sequence similar to the actin-binding site of human profilin I was detected within this region. 13-Mers containing these profilin-like segments bound actin in fluorescent anisotropy studies and competed with profilin for binding to actin. Using site-directed mutagenesis, the 11-amino acid profilin-like actin-binding motifs (amino acids 49-59 of B1 and 55-65 of B2) were replaced with an 11-amino acid spacer with a sequence based on the homologous sequence from subunit B of Pyrococcus horikoshii, an organism that lacks an actin cytoskeleton. These substitutions eliminated the actin-binding activity of the B subunit fusion proteins. In summary, binding between V-ATPase and F-actin in osteoclasts occurs in response to blocking phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity. This response was fully reversible. The actin binding activities of the B subunits of V-ATPase required 11-amino acid actin-binding motifs that are similar in sequence to the actin-binding site of mammalian profilin I.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Relationship of F-actin distribution to development of polar shape in human polymorphonuclear neutrophils.

Polymerization of actin has been associated with development of polar shape in human neutrophils (PMN). To examine the relation of filamentous actin (F-actin) distribution to shape change in PMN, we developed a method using computerized video image analysis and fluorescence microscopy to quantify distribution of F-actin in single cells. PMN were labeled with fluorescent probe NBD-phallicidin to measure filamentous actin and Texas red to assess cell thickness. We show that Texas red fluorescence is a reasonable measure of cell thickness and that correction of the NBD-phallicidin image for cell thickness using the Texas red image permits assessment of focal F-actin content. Parameters were derived that quantify total F-actin content, movement of F-actin away from the center of the cell, asymmetry of F-actin distribution, and change from round to polar shape. The sequence of change in F-actin distribution and its relation to development of polar shape in PMN was determined using these parameters. After stimulation with chemotactic peptide at 25 degrees C, F-actin polymerized first at the rim of the PMN. This was followed by development of asymmetry of F-actin distribution and change to polar shape. The dominant pseudopod developed first in the region of lower F-actin concentration followed later by polymerization of actin in the end of the developed pseudopod. Asymmetric F-actin distribution was detected in round PMN before development of polar shape. Based upon these data, asymmetric distribution of F-actin is coincident with and probably precedes development of polar shape in PMN stimulated in suspension by chemotactic peptide.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

The two ADF-H domains of twinfilin play functionally distinct roles in interactions with actin monomers.

Twinfilin is a ubiquitous and abundant actin monomer-binding protein that is composed of two ADF-H domains. To elucidate the role of twinfilin in actin dynamics, we examined the interactions of mouse twinfilin and its isolated ADF-H domains with G-actin. Wild-type twinfilin binds ADP-G-actin with higher affinity (K(D) = 0.05 microM) than ATP-G-actin (K(D) = 0.47 microM) under physiological ionic conditions and forms a relatively stable (k(off) = 1.8 s(-1)) complex with ADP-G-actin. Data from native PAGE and size exclusion chromatography coupled with light scattering suggest that twinfilin competes with ADF/cofilin for the high-affinity binding site on actin monomers, although at higher concentrations, twinfilin, cofilin, and actin may also form a ternary complex. By systematic deletion analysis, we show that the actin-binding activity is located entirely in the two ADF-H domains of twinfilin. Individually, these domains compete for the same binding site on actin, but the C-terminal ADF-H domain, which has >10-fold higher affinity for ADP-G-actin, is almost entirely responsible for the ability of twinfilin to increase the amount of monomeric actin in cosedimentation assays. Isolated ADF-H domains associate with ADP-G-actin with rapid second-order kinetics, whereas the association of wild-type twinfilin with G-actin exhibits kinetics consistent with a two-step binding process. These data suggest that the association with an actin monomer induces a first-order conformational change within the twinfilin molecule. On the basis of these results, we propose a kinetic model for the role of twinfilin in actin dynamics and its possible function in cells.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Polarity sorting of actin filaments in cytochalasin-treated fibroblasts.

The polarity of actin filaments is fundamental for the subcellular mechanics of actin-myosin interaction; however, little is known about how actin filaments are oriented with respect to myosin in non-muscle cells and how actin polarity organization is established and maintained. Here we approach these questions by investigating changes in the organization and polarity of actin relative to myosin II during actin filament translocation. Actin and myosin II reorganization was followed both kinetically, using microinjected fluorescent analogs of actin and myosin, and ultrastructurally, using myosin S1 decoration and immunogold labelling, in cultured fibroblasts that were induced to contract by treatment with cytochalasin D. We observed rapid (within 15 minutes) formation of ordered actin filament arrays: short tapered bundles and aster-like assemblies, in which filaments had uniform polarity with their barbed ends oriented toward the aggregate of myosin II at the base of a bundle or in the center of an aster. The resulting asters further interacted with each other and aggregated into bigger asters. The arrangement of actin in asters was in sharp contrast to the mixed polarity of actin filaments relative to myosin in non-treated cells. At the edge of the cell, actin filaments became oriented with their barbed ends toward the cell center; that is, the orientation was opposite to what was observed at the edge of nontreated cells. This rearrangement is indicative of relative translocation of actin and myosin II and of the ability of myosin II to sort actin filaments with respect to their polarity during translocation. The results suggest that the myosin II-actin system of non-muscle cells is organized as a dynamic network where actin filament arrangement is defined in the course of its interaction with myosin II.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Quantitative changes in cytoskeletal and nuclear actins during cellular transformation.

Actin, a highly conserved protein comprising cell stress fibers and other cellular structures, is found in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of cells and responds to both epigenetic signals and altered gene expression occurring during tumorigenesis. We have previously shown that changes in the cytoplasmic F- and G-actin ratios reflect bladder cancer risk. To determine whether nuclear actin is also altered and how nuclear and cytoplasmic actin alterations are interrelated in transformation, an in vitro model of carcinogen-induced transformation consisting of 2 human uroepithelial cell lines immortalized by infection with SV-40 was studied. One line, HUC-PC, is tumorigenic in nude mice after incubation with the carcinogen 4-ABP, the other, HUC-BC, is not. Cytoplasmic and nuclear F- and G-actin were determined by QFIA on individual cells using fluorochrome-labeled phallicidin and DNase, I, respectively. Before exposure to 4-ABP, the PC cells had lower cytoplasmic F-actin content, higher cytoplasmic G-actin content, but similar levels of nuclear G- and F-actin in comparison to the BC cells. After incubation with 4-ABP, F-actin decreased and G-actin increased in both cytoplasm and nuclei of PC cells and cytoplasmic F-actin fibers were lost, but only cytoplasmic actin was altered in the BC cells. Northern blot analysis showed the expression of the beta-actin gene was only approximately 20% lower in 4-ABP-treated PC cells than in untreated controls, indicating the cellular change in actin was attributed to a shift between F- and G-actin proteins rather than to net actin synthesis.

Actins↗

A comparison of methods used to characterize gelation of actin in vitro.

We have compared the meniscus depletion assay and falling ball viscometry, two means of assessing the extent of gelation in actin-based systems using mixtures of actin and the actin-binding protein filamin. We examined the effect of varying the concentrations of actin and filamin in both assays. The interaction of actin and filamin was detected only above a threshold concentration of filamin. This threshold concentration was lower for falling ball viscometry than for the meniscus depletion assay at equal actin concentrations. At constant concentrations of filamin, an increase in actin concentration caused an increase in apparent viscosity measured by the falling ball assay, but a decrease in sedimentability detected by the meniscus depletion assay. The rate of sedimentation of actin was dependent on the molar ratio of actin to filamin. At each molar ratio, the sedimentation of actin was not dependent on the specific concentrations of actin and filamin used. The apparent viscosity was dependent on both the molar ratio and the specific concentrations of actin and filamin. To relate the present results to earlier studies, we examined mixtures of actin and filamin using a macroscopic assay of gelation (tube tipping assay), and polarized light microscopy. The effect of increasing filamin concentration in the four assays was compared at three actin concentrations. Mixtures of actin and filamin whose apparent viscosities were low enough to be estimated by falling ball viscometry were optically isotropic fluids that flowed out of inverted test tubes. Mixtures of actin and filamin in the range of sensitivity of the meniscus depletion assay were either viscous fluids or gels, and were either optically isotropic or anisotropic. Thus, the four assays provide different estimates of gelation. Both the meniscus depletion assay and falling ball viscometry can be used to determine relative gelation activity, but neither can be used as a quantitative assay of gelation.

Actins↗

Direct binding of F-actin to ponticulin, an integral plasma membrane glycoprotein.

We have developed an 125I-labeled F-actin blot overlay assay for the identification of F-actin-binding proteins after transfer to nitrocellulose from SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Two major F-actin-binding proteins from Dictyostelium discoideum, a cytoplasmic 30 kDa protein and a 17 kDa integral membrane protein, and two minor membrane polypeptides of 19 kDa and 15 kDa were detected by this method. Using F-actin affinity and immunoaffinity chromatography, the 17 kDa polypeptide was identified as ponticulin, a previously described actin-binding glycoprotein from D. discoideum plasma membranes (Wuestehube, L.J., and Luna, E.J., [1987]: J. Cell Biol. 105:1741-1751). The binding of F-actin to ponticulin on blots is specific because unlabeled F-actin competes with 125I-labeled F-actin and because G-actin does not bind. Nitrocellulose-bound ponticulin displays binding characteristics similar to those of purified plasma membranes in solution, e.g., F-actin binding is sensitive to high salt and to elevated temperatures. Under optimal conditions, 125-I-labeled F-actin blot overlays are at least as sensitive as are immunoblots with an antibody specific for ponticulin. When blotted onto nitrocellulose after 2-D gel electrophoresis, all isoforms of ponticulin and of the 19 kDa and 15 kDa polypeptides appear to bind F-actin in proportion to their abundance. Thus the actin-binding activies of these proteins do not appear to be regulated by modifications that affect isoelectric point. However, the actin-binding activity of nitrocellulose-bound ponticulin is diminished when the protein is exposed to reducing agents, suggesting an involvement of disulfide bond(s) in ponticulin function. The 125I-labeled F-actin blot overlay assay also may enable us to identify F-actin-binding proteins in other cell types and should provide a convenient method for monitoring the purification of these proteins.

Actins↗