Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “stalled replication fork”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Stalled replication induces p53 accumulation through distinct mechanisms from DNA damage checkpoint pathways.

Stalled replication forks induce p53, which is required to maintain the replication checkpoint. In contrast to the well-established mechanisms of DNA damage-activated p53, the downstream effectors and upstream regulators of p53 during replication blockade remain to be deciphered. Hydroxyurea triggered accumulation of p53 through an increase in protein stability. The requirement of p53 accumulation for the replication checkpoint was not due to p21(CIP1/WAF1) as its down-regulation with short-hairpin RNA did not affect the checkpoint. Similar to DNA damage, stalled replication triggered the activation of the MRN-ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)/ATM and Rad3-related-CHK1/CHK2 axis. Down-regulation of CHK1 or CHK2, however, reduced p53 basal expression but not the hydroxyurea-dependent induction. Moreover, p53 was still stabilized in ataxia telangiectasia cells or in cells treated with caffeine, suggesting that ATM was not a critical determinant. These data also suggest that the functions of ATM, CHK1, and CHK2 in the replication checkpoint were not through the p53-p21(CIP1/WAF1) pathway. In contrast, induction of p53 by hydroxyurea was defective in cells lacking NBS1 and BLM. In this connection, the impaired replication checkpoint in several other genetic disorders has little correlation with the ability to stabilize p53. These data highlighted the different mechanisms involved in the stabilization of p53 after DNA damage and stalled replication forks.

Acid Anhydride Hydrolases↗

Recovery of DNA replication in UV-damaged Escherichia coli.

Following exposure to UV light DNA replication stops and then resumes. The SOS response is required for the restoration of replication. Replication recovery occurs in lexA(Ind) cells carrying a high constitutive level of RecA protein. Replication is also affected by UmuCD proteins, photoreactivation, and excision repair. In addition, there is a constitutive and recA independent way to replicate over UV photoproducts associated with the production of gaps in daughter DNA strands. There are two ways to account for the replication in UV-irradiated cells. A stalled replication fork can be reactivated. Alternatively, a replication fork could be destroyed irreparably, with no available way to complete the round of replication. In that case, postirradiation replication could be due exclusively to replication forks assembled de novo at the origin(s). Changes in replication initiation are observed following UV irradiation. Initiations are first inhibited and then stimulated. They become independent of de novo protein synthesis and sometimes do not stop in dnaA(ts) mutants shifted to 42 degrees C. Although the inducible functions are involved in the recovery of replication at different levels of UV damage, some modifications of the replication initiation mechanism appear to be specific to severely damaged cells. Such modifications seem to include the dnaA(ts) independence for initiations and the transient initiation inhibition. RecA protein can be directly involved both in the modification of initiation and in reactivation of the stalled replication forks. Although the restoration of replication depends on the SOS response a synthesis of some protein(s) that do not belong to the LexA regulon seems to be required as well. These proteins can be under RecA control and one of their functions may be to inhibit the rnhA gene. Certain recA mutations may selectively affect different mechanisms of the replication recovery (namely, recA430, recA727, recA718, recA1730). Overproduction of the photoreactivating enzyme in the dark could influence UmuCD activity in replication. The UmuCD function appears to be blocked in strains carrying the dnaE1026 mutation or overproducing the dnaQ protein. For some unknown reason the UmuCD-associated replication mechanism is the only one available for phage with damaged DNA.

DNA Damage↗

Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG.

The stalling of DNA replication forks that occurs as a consequence of encountering DNA damage is a critical problem for cells. RecG protein is involved in the processing of stalled replication forks, and acts by reversing the fork past the damage to create a four-way junction that allows template switching and lesion bypass. We have determined the crystal structure of RecG bound to a DNA substrate that mimics a stalled replication fork. The structure not only reveals the elegant mechanism used by the protein to recognize junctions but has also trapped the protein in the initial stage of fork reversal. We propose a mechanism for how forks are processed by RecG to facilitate replication fork restart. In addition, this structure suggests that the mechanism and function of the two largest helicase superfamilies are distinct.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Recombinational rescue of the stalled DNA replication fork: a model based on analysis of an Escherichia coli strain with a chromosome region difficult to replicate.

To examine the physiological effects of DNA replication arrest at the terminus (Ter), we constructed a replication-blocked Escherichia coli strain so that both bidirectional replication forks would be impeded at two flanking Ter sites, one artificial and the other natural. While the blocked strain grew slightly more slowly than a control strain, it had abnormal phenotypes similar to those of E. coli dam mutants, i.e., hyper-Rec phenotype, recA(+)- and recB+ (C+)-dependent growth, and constitutive SOS induction. The observation that these two apparently unrelated mutants cause similar phenotypes led us to design a model. We propose that the following sequential events may occur in both strains. A double-strand (ds) break occurs at the blocked replication fork in the blocked strain and at the ongoing fork in the dam mutant, through which RecBCD enzyme enters and degrades the ds DNA molecule, and the degradation product serves as the signal molecule for SOS induction. When RecBCD enzyme meets an appropriately oriented Chi sequence, its DNase activity is converted to recombinase enzyme, which is able to repair the ds end, recombinationally. this model (i) explains the puzzling phenotype of recA and recB (C) mutants and the SOS-inducing phenotype of polA, lig, and dna mutants under restrictive conditions, (ii) provides an interpretation for the role of the Chi sequence, and (iii) suggests a possible key role for homologous recombination with regard to cell survival following the arrest of DNA replication.

Chromosomes, Bacterial↗

DNA polymerase delta interacting protein 3 facilitates the activation and maintenance of DNA damage checkpoint in response to replication stress.

BACKGROUND: Replication stress response is crucial for the maintenance of a stable genome. POLDIP3 (DNA polymerase delta interacting protein 3) was initially identified as one of the DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) interacting proteins almost 20 years ago. Using a variety of in vitro biochemical assays, we previously established that POLDIP3 is a key regulator of the enzymatic activity of Pol δ. However, the in vivo function of POLDIP3 in DNA replication and DNA damage response has been elusive. METHODS: We first generated POLDIP3 knockout (KO) cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology. We then investigated its biological functions in vivo using a variety of biochemical and cell biology assays. RESULTS: We showed that although the POLDIP3-KO cells manifest no pronounced defect in global DNA synthesis under nonstress conditions, they are sensitive to a variety of replication fork blockers. Intriguingly, we found that POLDIP3 plays a crucial role in the activation and maintenance of the DNA damage checkpoint in response to exogenous as well as endogenous replication stress. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that when the DNA replication fork is blocked, POLDIP3 can be recruited to the stalled replication fork and functions to bridge the early DNA damage checkpoint response and the later replication fork repair/restart.

DNA Polymerase III↗

Mrc1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion to aid in recombination repair of spontaneous damage.

The SRS2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding a 3'-->5' DNA helicase is part of the postreplication repair pathway and functions to ensure proper repair of DNA damage arising during DNA replication through pathways that do not involve homologous recombination. Through a synthetic gene array analysis, genes that are essential when Srs2 is absent have been identified. Among these are MRC1, TOF1, and CSM3, which mediate the intra-S checkpoint response. srs2 Delta mrc1 Delta synthetic lethality is due to inappropriate recombination, as the lethality can be suppressed by genetic elimination of homologous recombination. srs2 Delta mrc1 Delta synthetic lethality is dependent on the role of Mrc1 in DNA replication but independent of the role of Mrc1 in a DNA damage checkpoint response. mrc1 Delta, tof1 Delta and csm3 Delta mutants have sister chromatid cohesion defects, implicating sister chromatid cohesion established at the replication fork as an important factor in promoting repair of stalled replication forks through gap repair.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

The function of Mgs1/WRNIP1 in genome maintenance.

Preservation of genomic integrity during replication is challenging, because replication forks are often stalled by several forms of DNA damage or stable secondary DNA structures. Prolonged stalling of the replication fork can lead to incomplete replication, which may induce double strand breaks, genome rearrangements and cell death. Therefore, several DNA repair mechanisms evolved to rescue stalled replication forks, which can elaborate in error-free or error-prone manners. The pathway selection and the fine tuning of the collaboration between different DNA repair proteins involved in the rescue of the stalled replication fork are very important. Based on our recent knowledge, yeast Mgs1 and its human homologue WRNIP1 proteins can be excellent candidates for this fine-tuning regulator function. In this review we summarize our current knowledge about them and try to point out the most important future steps to prove this hypothesis.

DNA repair↗

Recombinational DNA repair of damaged replication forks in Escherichia coli: questions.

It has recently become clear that the recombinational repair of stalled replication forks is the primary function of homologous recombination systems in bacteria. In spite of the rapid progress in many related lines of inquiry that have converged to support this view, much remains to be done. This review focuses on several key gaps in understanding. Insufficient data currently exists on: (a) the levels and types of DNA damage present as a function of growth conditions, (b) which types of damage and other barriers actually halt replication, (c) the structures of the stalled/collapsed replication forks, (d) the number of recombinational repair paths available and their mechanistic details, (e) the enzymology of some of the key reactions required for repair, (f) the role of certain recombination proteins that have not yet been studied, and (g) the molecular origin of certain in vivo observations associated with recombinational DNA repair during the SOS response. The current status of each of these topics is reviewed.

Bacterial Proteins↗

The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA helicase Rrm3p is needed for normal fork progression through >1000 discrete sites scattered throughout the genome. Here we show that replication of all yeast chromosomes was markedly delayed in rrm3 cells. Delayed replication was seen even in a region that lacks any predicted Rrm3p-dependent sites. Based on the pattern of replication intermediates in two-dimensional gels, the rate of fork movement in rrm3 cells appeared similar to wild-type except at known Rrm3p-dependent sites. These data suggest that although Rrm3p has a global role in DNA replication, its activity is needed only or primarily at specific, difficult-to-replicate sites. By the criterion of chromatin immunoprecipitation, Rrm3p was associated with both Rrm3p-dependent and -independent sites, and moved with the replication fork through both. In addition, Rrm3p interacted with Pol2p, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon, in vivo. Thus, rather than being recruited to its sites of action when replication forks stall at these sites, Rrm3p is likely a component of the replication fork apparatus.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Werner syndrome protein, the MRE11 complex and ATR: menage-à-trois in guarding genome stability during DNA replication?

The correct execution of the DNA replication process is crucially import for the maintenance of genome integrity of the cell. Several types of sources, both endogenous and exogenous, can give rise to DNA damage leading to the DNA replication fork arrest. The processes by which replication blockage is sensed by checkpoint sensors and how the pathway leading to resolution of stalled forks is activated are still not completely understood. However, recent emerging evidence suggests that one candidate for a sensor of replication stress is ATR and that, together with a member of RecQ family helicases, Werner syndrome protein (WRN) and MRE11 complex, can collaborate to promote the restarting of DNA synthesis through the resolution of stalled replication forks. Here, we discuss how WRN, the MRE11 complex and the ATR kinase could work together in response to replication blockage to avoid DNA replication fork collapse and genome instability.

DNA Damage↗

Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast.

The S-phase checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are activated in response to replication stress that induces replication fork arrest. In the absence of a functional S-phase checkpoint, stalled replication forks collapse and give rise to chromosome breakage. In an attempt to better understand replication dynamics in S-phase checkpoint mutants, we developed a replication origin array for budding yeast that contains 424 of 432 previously identified potential origin regions. As expected, mec1-1 and rad53-1 mutants failed to inhibit late origin activation. Surprisingly however, 17 early-firing regions were not replicated efficiently in these mutants. This was not due to a lack of initiation, but rather to problems during elongation, as replication forks arrested in close proximity to these origins, resulting in the accumulation of small replication intermediates and eventual replication fork collapse. Importantly, these regions were not only prone to chromosome breakage in the presence of exogenous stress but also in its absence, similar to fragile sites in the human genome.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗

Human claspin is a ring-shaped DNA-binding protein with high affinity to branched DNA structures.

Claspin is an essential protein for the ATR-dependent activation of the DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus and human cells. Here we describe the purification and characterization of human Claspin. The protein has a ring-like structure and binds with high affinity to branched DNA molecules. These findings suggest that Claspin may be a component of the replication ensemble and plays a role in the replication checkpoint by directly associating with replication forks and with the various branched DNA structures likely to form at stalled replication forks because of DNA damage.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1, the Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, associates with Swi1, a component of the replication fork protection complex.

The protein kinase Hsk1 is essential for DNA replication in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. It associates with Dfp1/Him1 to form an active complex equivalent to the Cdc7-Dbf4 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Swi1 and Swi3 are subunits of the replication fork protection complex in S. pombe that is homologous to the Tof1-Csm3 complex in S. cerevisiae. The fork protection complex helps to preserve the integrity of stalled replication forks and is important for activation of the checkpoint protein kinase Cds1 in response to fork arrest. Here we describe physical and genetic interactions involving Swi1 and Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1. Dfp1/Him1 was identified in a yeast two-hybrid screen with Swi1. Hsk1 and Dfp1/Him1 both co-immunoprecipitate with Swi1. Swi1 is required for growth of a temperature-sensitive hsk1 (hsk1ts) mutant at its semi-permissive temperature. Hsk1ts cells accumulate Rad22 (Rad52 homologue) DNA repair foci at the permissive temperature, as previously observed in swi1 cells, indicating that abnormal single-stranded DNA regions form near the replication fork in hsk1ts cells. hsk1ts cells were also unable to properly delay S-phase progression in the presence of a DNA alkylating agent and were partially defective in mating type switching. These data suggest that Hsk1-Dfp1/Him1 and Swi1-Swi3 complexes have interrelated roles in stabilization of arrested replication forks.

Alkylating Agents↗

A method to monitor replication fork progression in mammalian cells: nucleotide excision repair enhances and homologous recombination delays elongation along damaged DNA.

The capacity to rescue stalled replication forks (RFs) is important for the maintenance of cell viability and genome integrity. Here, we have developed a novel method for monitoring RF progression and the influence of DNA lesions on this process. The method is based on the principle that each RF is expected to be associated with a pair of single-stranded ends, which can be analyzed by employing strand separation in alkali. This method was applied to examine the rate of RF progression in Chinese hamster cell lines deficient in ERCC1, which is involved in nucleotide excision repair (NER), or in XRCC3, which participates in homologous recombination repair, following irradiation with ultraviolet (UV) light or exposure to benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE). The endpoints observed were cell survival, NER activity, formation of double-strand breaks and the rate of RF progression. Subsequently, we attempted to explain our observation that cells deficient in XRCC3 (irs1SF) exhibit enhanced sensitivity to UV radiation and BPDE. irs1SF cells demonstrated a capacity for NER that was comparable with wild-type AA8 cells, but the rate of RF progression was even higher than that for the wild-type AA8 cells. As expected, cells deficient in ERCC1 (UV4) showed no NER activity and were hypersensitive to both UV radiation and BPDE. The observation that cells deficient in NER displayed a pronounced delay in RF progression indicates that NER plays an important role in maintaining fork progression along damaged DNA. The elevated rate of RF progression in XRCC3-deficient cells indicates that this protein is involved in a time-consuming process which resolves stalled RFs.

7,8-Dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene 9,10-oxide↗

Semi-conservative DNA replication through telomeres requires Taz1.

Telomere replication is achieved through the combined action of the conventional DNA replication machinery and the reverse transcriptase, telomerase. Telomere-binding proteins have crucial roles in controlling telomerase activity; however, little is known about their role in controlling semi-conservative replication, which synthesizes the bulk of telomeric DNA. Telomere repeats in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe are bound by Taz1, a regulator of diverse telomere functions. It is generally assumed that telomere-binding proteins impede replication fork progression. Here we show that, on the contrary, Taz1 is crucial for efficient replication fork progression through the telomere. Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, we find that loss of Taz1 leads to stalled replication forks at telomeres and internally placed telomere sequences, regardless of whether the telomeric G-rich strand is replicated by leading- or lagging-strand synthesis. In contrast, the Taz1-interacting protein Rap1 is dispensable for efficient telomeric fork progression. Upon loss of telomerase, taz1Delta telomeres are lost precipitously, suggesting that maintenance of taz1Delta telomere repeats cannot be sustained through semi-conservative replication. As the human telomere proteins TRF1 and TRF2 are Taz1 orthologues, we predict that one or both of the human TRFs may orchestrate fork passage through human telomeres. Stalled forks at dysfunctional human telomeres are likely to accelerate the genomic instability that drives tumorigenesis.

DNA Replication↗

G-quadruplex structures as regulators of cellular processes and drivers of genome instability in cancer.

G-quadruplexes (G4s) are essential regulatory structures whose biological functions are inseparable from their potential to destabilize the genome. They play critical roles in transcription, replication and chromatin architecture, yet they also contribute to the genomic instability that fuels cancer. This dual role is an inherent consequence of where G4s form in the genome. G4s are enriched at highly active regulatory regions, including promoters, replication origins and topologically associated domain boundaries, where their controlled formation and resolution by helicases and topoisomerases support normal genome function. When this control is lost, the same features that make G4s functional become harmful, leading to R-loop and G-loop accumulation, replication fork stalling and increased conflicts between transcription and replication. Topoisomerase activity, which normally relieves supercoiling stress, can instead generate the DNA double-strand breaks that characterize cancer genomes. Persistent G4 structures also promote micronuclei formation and cytoplasmic DNA accumulation, activating the cGAS-STING innate immune signaling pathway. Here, we discuss these mechanisms and present pan-cancer genomic analyses showing that these processes operate broadly across human tumors. Therapeutically targeting G4s requires balancing their essential regulatory roles with their pathological effects. Understanding this tension is therefore essential for exploiting G4s as therapeutic targets across cancer types.

DEAH-box helicases↗

Early steps of Bacillus subtilis primosome assembly.

Primosomes are nucleoprotein assemblies designed for the activation of DNA replication forks. Their primary role is to recruit the replicative helicase onto single-stranded DNA. The "replication restart" primosome, defined in Escherichia coli, is involved in the reactivation of arrested replication forks. Binding of the PriA protein to forked DNA triggers its assembly. PriA is conserved in bacteria, but its primosomal partners are not. In Bacillus subtilis, genetic analysis has revealed three primosomal proteins, DnaB, DnaD, and DnaI, that have no obvious homologues in E. coli. Interestingly, they are involved in primosome function both at arrested replication forks and at the chromosomal origin. Our biochemical analysis of the DnaB and DnaD proteins unravels their role in primosome assembly. They are both multimeric and bind individually to DNA. Furthermore, DnaD stimulates DnaB binding activities. DnaD alone and the DnaD/DnaB pair interact specifically with PriA of B. subtilis on several DNA substrates. This suggests that the nucleoprotein assembly is sequential in the PriA, DnaD, DnaB order. The preferred DNA substrate mimics an arrested DNA replication fork with unreplicated lagging strand, structurally identical to a product of recombinational repair of a stalled replication fork.

Bacillus subtilis↗