Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “generalization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Randomized controlled trial of general practitioner tutor visit or mailing to encourage general practice-based education.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of a general practitioner tutor visit, or mailing, with regard to the amount of practice-based education occurring in general practices. DESIGN: An initial survey of all practices in the Mersey Deanery was undertaken. General practices which replied were randomly allocated to receive a GP tutor visit (n=38), to receive a mailing (n=38) or to a control group (n=36). Visits carried out by tutors covered a loosely agreed format. All practices were sent a follow-up survey identical to the original one at 6 months after the intervention. SETTING: General practices in the Mersey Deanery, north-west England. SUBJECTS: General practices which had replied to an initial survey. RESULTS: The amount of both specifically arranged and informal practice-based meetings increased in all groups. No changes were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the difficulty of assessing educational interventions by randomized controlled trials. Such interventions are often expensive, complex and difficult to standardize. A substantial amount of practice-based education is taking place.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗
PubMed1992

Educating students with mild handicaps in general classrooms: essential teaching practices for general and special educators.

This study was designed to identify and validate essential teaching practices needed by both general and special educators to successfully educate students with mild handicaps in general classrooms. An interdisciplinary panel of 105 experts, evenly divided into university-based and field-based participants from 35 states, identified 96 of 125 practices in six categories as being essential for effective teaching of mainstreamed students with mild handicaps. Based on a two-round Delphi procedure, a substantial majority (82%) of these teaching practices were seen as being essential for both general and special educators across all six rated categories. Panel ratings were significantly higher for special educators than general educators on four of the six categories. No significant differences in ratings were found for university-based versus field-based panelists, or for field-based panelists who were professionals directly involved in elementary or secondary teaching roles versus administrators, supervisors, and consultants. Based on essential teaching practices validated in this study, implications for preservice teacher preparation and staff development programs for general and special educators are discussed.

Persons with Disabilities↗
PubMed2004

[The practice guideline 'Pregnancy and puerperium' (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of general practice medicine].

The first revision of the Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline about pregnancy and puerperium does not significantly differ from the first edition. The guideline is extensive, is well-worth reading and supports daily practice. There is a greater emphasis on the importance of cooperation and differentiation in primary care (midwifes and general practitioners). During the last decade many general practitioners stopped doing home deliveries and have therefore lost their experience in obstetric care and pathology. The guideline describes the general practitioner's tasks as a preconception counsellor, a professional expert on illnesses during pregnancy and after the delivery, and as the doctor of the newborn baby. It will hopefully stimulate a revived interest of and involvement in pregnancy and post-partum care among general practitioners.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1989

[Diagnostic activity in general practice. 2. Frequency of examination of urinary glucose and blood pressure determination among patients in general practice].

In order to estimate how frequently examinations of urine for glucosuria and blood pressure measurements are performed in the primary health care sector to detect common incapacitating diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, the authors carried out a study in five general practices in Denmark for a period of five years. The study was retrospective because it is not possible to study one's own behaviour prospectively. Nearly 1,000 persons aged 30 years or more were involved. 9% of the group had no contact with the health care sector during the period. In 49%, the urine had been tested at least once for glucose; 58% where women were concerned but only 40% of the men. Men under the age of 55 years were significantly underrepresented. Examination of the urine was only undertaken in 51% of the persons aged 55-74 years. Twelve new cases of diabetes were discovered, nine of these were diagnosed in general practice. Hypertension had been diagnosed in 52 patients before the registration period. 60% of the remainder had blood pressure measurements on at least one occasion during the period. Men under 55 years were significantly underrepresented (42%). Sixty-four new cases of hypertension were discovered, 59 of these in general practice. Screening for common diseases such as these is primarily performed by general practitioner. Several other works from general practice where no special efforts were made to systematize screening for diabetes or hypertension did not reveal any better results. It is estimated that 25% of diabetic patients and 50% of hypertensive patients remain undiagnosed. The present rather random screening for these diseases is insufficient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Screening for psychiatric illness in general practice: the general practitioner versus the screening questionnaire.

This study compares the characteristics of general practitioners and a pen and paper test in the detection of psychiatric disorder in primary care settings. A psychiatrist interviewed a stratified sample of 283 patients drawn from 590 consecutive new illnesses seen in 15 general practices. Research diagnoses could be made in between one-quarter and one-third of the consecutive new illnesses. Two different research diagnostic systems agreed quite well with one another about who should be regarded as a psychiatric 'case' - although agreement between them for individual diagnoses was less impressive. Research diagnoses of psychiatric illnesses could be made in approximately 30% of new episodes of illnesses seen. If the DSM-3 system was used as a criterion of 'caseness', the specificity of the general health questionnaire was 75.4%, and the sensitivity was 87.1%. The general practitioners had fewer false positives than the questionnaire, but they were much more likely to miss psychiatric cases. Use of the general health questionnaire could increase their sensitivity from about 50% to 95%.

Family Practice↗
PubMed1995

Care of schizophrenia in general practice: the general practitioner and the patient.

BACKGROUND: The transfer of patients with chronic schizophrenia from large mental hospitals into the community has had an impact on the role of the general practitioner in the effective delivery of primary care services to these patients. AIM: A study was undertaken to assess the care available in general practice for patients with schizophrenia, the attitudes of general practitioners and patients to the care provided and the factors influencing patients' use of services. METHOD: Eighty three patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 26 doctors in 13 London practices registered on the VAMP research bank took part in a series of structured and semi-structured interviews. This was followed by a systematic examination of the patients' case notes. RESULTS: Only 14 patients (17%) had no active symptoms according to the present state examination interview and 52 (63%) were currently taking antipsychotic medication. Fifty three patients were in contact with a psychiatrist. Approximately one quarter of patients were visited by a community psychiatric nurse; in 18 of these 19 cases, the main reason for contact was reported to be for administration of medication by depot injection. In all but one case, patients seeing a community psychiatric nurse were also being seen by a psychiatrist. Sixteen doctors reported having had a consultation in the previous month with a patient's relative, friend or member of hostel staff. There were considerable differences between patients and their doctors in their attitudes to the use of services. Of the 26 general practitioners, 23 were enthusiastic about the possibility of introducing shared care records. Of the 54 patients in contact with a mental health professional, only 18 favoured the use of shared care records. Most of the doctors (19, 73%) reported they would welcome a psychiatric liaison service in their practice; 40% of 53 patients said they would not. Patients receiving antipsychotic drugs and patients registered with inner city practices attended their general practitioners more frequently than those not taking antipsychotic medication and those registered with suburban practices. Use of antipsychotic medication (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 8.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 30.7, P < 0.01), male sex (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 22.1, P < 0.01) and active symptoms on the present state examination (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 17.5, P = 0.06) were all predictive of current contact with mental health professionals. CONCLUSION: Family doctors were closely involved with the care of patients with schizophrenia and their relatives and were eager for increased liaison with secondary care services. Although patients were more resistant than doctors to management innovations this may reflect lack of familiarity with changes in community services. Greater input is needed by mental health professionals, particularly community psychiatric nurses, and some consideration of the burden of care in inner city practices is necessary in health service planning.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Management of angina pectoris in general practice: a questionnaire survey of general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the current management of angina pectoris in general practice. AIM: This survey set out to assess general practitioners' perceptions of current investigation and treatment for angina pectoris. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to all 217 general practitioners listed with the Hampshire Family Health Services Authority who have access to a regional cardiac centre in Southampton. RESULTS: The response rate was 79% (171 of 217). The majority (80%) of general practitioners reported referring 10% or fewer of their patients with angina to a cardiologist at the regional centre, and 72% reported referring a quarter or fewer of their patients to a hospital physician. Most (77%) considered an exercise test useful for diagnosis of angina, but almost half (47%) were uncertain about its prognostic value. Most respondents (79%) were not confident of interpreting the results of an exercise test. The majority (79%) believed that there was scientific evidence to show that coronary angioplasty relieves symptoms and 21% were of the opinion that it prolongs survival. Ninety six per cent believed coronary artery bypass grafting relieves symptoms and 62% that it prolongs survival. CONCLUSION: General practitioners do not appear to refer the majority of patients with angina pectoris for hospital investigation, and express divergent and contradictory opinions about exercise testing and the scientific evidence for the benefits of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery. Easier access to cardiological investigation and population based data about the value of exercise testing and survival benefits from coronary intervention are required to optimize selection of patients in the community who are most likely to benefit from coronary revascularization.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1994

Exploratory study of general practitioners' orientations to general practice and responses to change.

BACKGROUND: Research into general practitioners' responses to the changes in the health service has focused on the quantifiable dimensions of workload, stress, job satisfaction and mental health. AIM: This study set out to investigate general practitioners' practice orientations and responses to change. METHOD: The study was undertaken in 1992. 'Young principals' who had attended MSD Foundation regional courses were invited by letter to reflect on recent change in general practice and to give their views on morale and recruitment. RESULTS: Forty nine young principals responded (response rate 45%). Responses were found to cluster around four orientations to practice: collectivism, pragmatism, traditionalism, and alienation. These varied in terms of four underlying values: autonomy, individualism, external referent and optimism. CONCLUSION: General practitioners' responses to change are more complex than is currently understood and are influenced by orientation to practice. In a relatively homogeneous 'enthusiastic' subgroup of general practitioners there is striking variation in practice orientation.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Do general practitioners and general psychiatrists want to look after drug misusers? Evaluation of a non-specialist treatment policy.

A new means of monitoring drug misuse which was developed in the north west of England, but is now widely used throughout the United Kingdom, is described and evaluated. Report forms which had been specially designed and ensured the anonymity of drug misusers were widely distributed among doctors and non-medical health workers who may have had contact with drug misusers. The forms were returned post-free to a centre where they were entered on a customized drug misuse database. There were 2127 reports from the north west of England (population 3.99 million) relating to 1792 individuals over a 15-month period. However, despite intensive promotion of the project among doctors, the number of reports from doctors remained virtually unchanged over the 15 months despite a 33% increase in the overall number of reports. When the reports from three health districts, selected so as to be representative of the region demographically (total population 658,500, population aged 15-44 years 292,200), were considered there was a substantial fall (70%) in reports from general practitioners which was considerably greater than the 2% fall in all reports. In a linked study all the psychiatrists, 30% of probation officers and a one in six sample of general practitioners from the three selected health districts were approached for interview at the beginning of the 15-month period and again a year later. This structured enquiry about caseloads, treatment, and attitudes also revealed a fall in the number of drug misusers attended by general practitioners and general psychiatrists and a reduction in the services provided for them by general practitioners.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Continuing education for general practice. 1. Experience, competence and the media of self-directed learning for established general practitioners.

The arrangements under which continuing education for general practice is provided and attendance by general practitioners is rewarded have now been in operation for three years. More recently, reaccreditation has emerged as a significant issue for the profession. For these reasons it appears timely to review the whole basis of ongoing learning by established general practitioners. In this the first of two papers, learning by established professionals is considered in relation to the educational development of the learner, the role of experience and the goals of competence and performance. It is concluded that self-directed learning based on experience should form the centre-piece of continuing education for general practice and that educational provision should adopt a complementary role in sustaining motivation to learn and by enabling learning from experience to be shared and enriched. A model of self-directed learning, connecting experience and competence through systematic application of three learning media, reading, reflection and audit, is proposed and related to appropriate educational participation by established general practitioners.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2003

[General anesthesia for disabled patients undergoing dental treatment in a general hospital].

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia for dental treatment in disabled patients may present particular problems, especially when it is done in a general hospital, compared with specialized dental hospitals. METHODS: We surveyed 24 patients who underwent dental treatment under general anesthesia in our institution during the last decade. RESULTS: Electrocardiography or chest x-ray photography was not obtained in 8 patients owing to lack of patients' cooperation. Slow induction with sevoflurane was selected in 5 patients, because intravenous cannulae could not be placed owing to their rejection. Nasotracheal intubation was performed in all patients, but no difficulty in intubation was documented. As postoperative complications, we observed convulsion in one patient and muscle rigidity in another, but no critical troubles related to circulatory or respiratory status. In patients who were treated for more than ten teeth, we observed differences in age, body weight, duration of anesthesia, maximum concentration of sevoflurane administered during anesthesia, and use of postoperative analgesics compared with the other patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found particular problems of anesthesia for disable patients undergoing dental treatment in a general hospital, and suggest that information on numbers of teeth to be treated is helpful.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

What constitutes general surgical training? Evidence from the log books of trainees in one district general hospital.

It is accepted wisdom that surgical expertise in the UK is achieved by virtue of long service, and perhaps not enough genuine training. The average age at appointment to consultant posts in general surgery has risen from 37.0 years in 1978 to 38.0 in 1992. This message has reached the politicians who run the Health Service: at the Association of Surgeons in Training Annual General Meeting in September 1991 Mrs Virginia Bottomley said 'A complaint often made to me is that trainees, particularly surgical trainees, in the UK are over-experienced but under-trained'. Training posts acquire a reputation (good or bad) based on word of mouth, pass rate in examinations, and success in placing trainees into higher grades. Little is known about the relationship between training and operative experience. Log books have been introduced as a compulsory requirement for the Clinical Surgery in General and Intercollegiate Specialty Examinations. This report aims to define the operative experience of trainees at a District General Hospital by analysis of data obtained from their log books. This information has been used to calculate trainee workload in terms of intermediate equivalents (IE) and service equivalent value (SEV).

Education, Medical, Graduate↗
PubMed2003

A general dental practice research network: impact of oral health in general dental practice patients.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the subjective impact of oral health in a group of patients attending general dental practices in the North West of England and to investigate the attributes of dentists and practices in order to examine how such attributes might relate to patients' subjective perceptions of oral health. DESIGN: Fifteen general dental practices conducting a simultaneous survey of attending patients and 15 practitioners from these practices providing information about their attitudes to treatment, prevention and various aspects of their surgery. SETTING: General dental OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient subjective impact scores. Relationships between practice and practitioner variables and patients' subjectively perceived oral health. RESULTS: Fifteen practitioners with diverse practice attributes provided data on 718 patients. The mean total oral health impact score was 18.4. Twenty two per cent of patients had experienced pain in the four weeks before the survey and 11% had been unable to chew some foods. Fifty five per cent of the surveyed population had, in the previous year, worried about the appearance of their mouth and 65% had worried about their oral health in general. Dentists' beliefs were related to patient impact scores but practice attributes were not significantly associated with patients' impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen percent of the differences in patients' subjectively perceived oral health can be attributed to dentist attitudes and attributes. Further research regarding the influence of dentists personality and professional beliefs on patients well-being needs to be undertaken.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Pharmaceutical trials in general practice: the first 100 protocols. An audit by the clinical research ethics committee of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of 100 general practice based, multicentre research projects submitted to the ethics committee of the Royal College of General Practitioners by pharmaceutical companies or their agents between 1984 and 1989. DESIGN: Analysis of consecutive submitted protocols for stated objectives, study design, and outcomes; detailed review of committee minutes and correspondence in relation to amendment and approval; assessment of final reports submitted at conclusion of studies. SUBJECTS: 82 finally approved protocols, embracing 34,523 proposed trial subjects and 1195 proposed general practice investigators. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success at enrolling subjects and investigators; commencement and completion data; validity of final report's assessment of efficacy, safety, tolerability, and acceptability; and method of use and dissemination of findings. RESULTS: 18 studies were not approved and 45 had to be amended. Randomised controlled trials comprised 46 of the original submissions. Remuneration considerations, inadequate information or consent sheets, pregnancy safety, the need to discontinue existing therapy, and suboptimal scientific content were major reasons for rejecting studies or asking for amendments. Of the 82 approved studies 8 were not started. Shortfalls of investigators (of 39%) and trial subjects (of 37%) and an overall 23% withdrawal rate were responsible for a significant incidence of inconclusive results. Within the six year follow up interval, only 19 of the studies had been formally published. CONCLUSIONS: This audit identified substantial ethical concerns in the process of approving multicentre general practice pharmaceutical research.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Screening for anxiety and depression in adult general medical in-patients in a Scottish District General Hospital.

We prospectively screened for anxiety and depression by administering the HAD scale to consecutive general medical patients admitted to a Scottish District General Hospital (DGH) over a calendar month. Age, gender, and use of psychotropic medications were also recorded. Of 119 patients (49 male) aged 16 to 92 years, "Probable presence of anxiety" was recorded in 23%, and "Probable presence of depression" in 19%. There was no significant difference between male and female patients or between different age groups. Formal psychological management was not available on site. Sixty-seven per cent of patients with "Probable presence of anxiety" and 61% with "Probable presence of depression" received no psychotropic medications. Despite a high prevalence of psychological distress amongst general medical in-patients, anxiety and depression are consistently under-diagnosed and under-treated. Screening for psychological distress, followed, where indicated, by psychological and/or pharmacological intervention, should be a fundamental element of holistic, patient-centred care in general medicine.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Advantage of combined spinal, epidural and general anesthesia in comparison to general anesthesia in abdominal surgery].

Type and technique of anesthesia have an important effect on per operative surgical course. The aim of the study was prospective analyses of advantages of combined spinal, epidural and general anesthesia (CSEGA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in abdominal surgery according to: 1. operative course (haemodynamic stability of patients, quality of analgesia, undesirables effects), 2. postoperative course (quality of analgesia, unfavourable effects, temporary abode of patients in intensive care). Using prospective randomized double blind controlled study, we evaluated two groups of patients whom the same type of abdominal surgical intervention was planed and the only difference was the type of technique of anesthesia. First group of patients (n = 34), was treated with CSEGA and second group of patients (n = 33), was treated only with standard (GA). Both groups had intraoperative and 24-hour-long postoperative continued monitoring of blood pressure, central venous pressure, and dieresis. In the 24 hours postoperative period, the following parameters were analyzed: vigilance conditions, motor block level, pain intensity in rest and movement, necessity for a complementary analgesia, side effects and final subjective effect of analgesia. There was important difference in waking up the patients after a general anesthesia--in the first group this period was shorter. In the first 24 hours, patients from the first group didn't get any systemic analgesic, while the patients from the second group needed fractionary application of parenteral analgesics in the period of 4-6 hours. Patients from the first group were also physically faster and easier recovered and they had less respiratory complications and there was not any example of thromboembolsm and the intestine motility was faster re-established. First group of patients spent less time in intensive care (three days) than second group (six days). Final subjective effect of analgesia, according to verbal descriptive scale (VDS) of pain was satisfying with 75% of patients of the first group and 15% of patients of the second group. According to results investigation, advantages of CSEDGA versus GA in abdominal surgery manifold: better hemodynamic stability and perfusion of operative region, decrease of single doses of opioid analgesics, local and general anesthetics followed by the decrease of their side effects, better intensity and longer duration of analgesia, improved total functional capability of patients.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1995

The future of general surgery characterized by general surgical chief residents.

The future of any specialty in medicine depends in large part on the career choices of its trainees. We obtained data from General Surgery Chief Residents who finished their training in 1990 and compared their attitudes to a similar survey conducted by us in 1985. According to those responses, residents in general surgery continue to choose fellowship training at a time when they no longer perceive an oversupply of general surgeons. This has broad implications for the future of general surgery as a specialty that requires significant change in the structure of our residency programs.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1990

Eyelid twitching seizures and generalized tonic-clonic convulsions: a syndrome of idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

This is a report of two neurologically normal patients who had primary generalized seizures consisting of irregular fluttering or twitching movements of the eyelids accompanied by generalized, rhythmic 9- to 15-Hz electroencephalographic discharges as well as infrequent generalized tonic-clonic seizures. This is a syndrome of idiopathic generalized epilepsy that responds to treatment with valproic acid.

Acetazolamide↗