Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

[Transcranial electric stimulation therapy in the treatment of neurocirculatory asthenia].

Transcranial electric stimulation (TES), a combination of direct and pulse current totally up to 5 mA, rectangular impulses lasting 3-4 ms at a frequency of 75-80 Mz, via frontal and retromastoid electrodes was carried out for 30 minutes every other day. The treatment consisted of 7 to 10 sessions. Overall 189 patients suffering from vegetovascular dystonia were examined. Of these, 114 persons (group I) received pharmacotherapy and TES, 61 TES (group II), and 14 were on placebo. 83% of the group I patients and 80.3% of the group II patients manifested an appreciable improvement of the well-being which was supported by the data of its general estimation. 22 patients were examined for blood beta-endorphin. It has been shown that its concentration increased and returned to normal during TES.

Brain Injuries↗
PubMed2005

Motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery: technical aspects and comparison of transcranial and direct cortical stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates technical aspects, handling, and safety of intraoperatively applied transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and direct cortical stimulation (DCS) for eliciting muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) during cerebral aneurysm surgery. METHODS: In 119 patients undergoing cerebral aneurysm surgery, mMEPs were evoked by a train of five stimuli with individual pulse duration of 0.5 milliseconds, a repetition rate of 2 Hz, and constant current anodal stimulation. The maximal stimulation intensity was 240 mA for transcranial and 33 mA for direct stimulation. mMEPs were recorded continuously from the abductor pollicis brevis, from tibial anterior muscles bilaterally, and from the biceps brachii and extensor digitorum communis muscles contralateral to the side operated on. RESULTS: In 118 (99%) of 119 patients, transcranially evoked mMEPs were monitorable for the vascular territory of interest. DCS was performed successfully in 95 (95%) of 100 patients. In 86 (99%) of 87 patients with internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, or posterior circulation aneurysms, mMEPs from upper-extremity muscles were obtained with DCS. In 11 (55%) of 20 patients with anterior communicating artery, anterior cerebral artery, or pericallosal aneurysms, mMEPs from the lower-extremity muscles could be recorded. The incidence of seizures was 0.84% for TES and 1% for DCS. Minor and inconsequential subdural bleeding after positioning of the strip electrode occurred in 2%. CONCLUSION: The cogent comprehensive combination of transcranial and direct cortical electrical stimulation allows for the continuous mMEP monitoring of the cerebral vascular territory of interest in 99% of the patients with cerebral aneurysms. Unwarranted effects of electrode placement and stimulation are rare and without clinical consequences.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Which part of the current waveform causes the stimulation?

To investigate the mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we compared the directional effects of two stimulators (Magstim 200 and Magstim Super Rapid). First, stimulating visual cortex and facial nerve with occipital mid-line TMS, we found that, for a particular coil orientation, these two stimulators affected a particular neural structure in opposite hemispheres and that, to affect a particular neural structure in a particular hemisphere, these two stimulators required opposite coil orientations. Second, stimulating a membrane-simulating circuit, we found that, for a particular coil orientation, these two stimulators resulted in a peak induced current of the same polarity but in a peak induced charge accumulation of opposite polarity. We suggest that the critical parameter in TMS is the amplitude of the induced charge accumulation rather than the amplitude of the induced current. Accordingly, TMS would be elicited just before the end of the first (Magstim 200) and second (Magstim Super Rapid) phase of the induced current rather than just after the start of the first phase of the induced current.

Electric Stimulation↗
PubMed2005

Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation.

Specific stimulation of neuronal circuits may promote selective inhibition or facilitation of corticospinal tract excitability. Monophasic stimulation is more likely to achieve direction-specific neuronal excitation. In 10 healthy subjects, we compared four types of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), monophasic and biphasic stimuli with the initial current in the brain flowing antero-posteriorly ("posteriorly directed") or postero-anteriorly ("anteriorly directed"). We applied rTMS over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand, using 80 stimuli at 5 Hz frequency at an intensity yielding baseline motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes of 1 mV. Monophasic stimulation was always more efficient than biphasic. Facilitation was induced by intracerebral anteriorly directed current flow and inhibition by posteriorly oriented current flow, although only initially for approximately 30 pulses. The early inhibition was absent when studied during a tonic muscle contraction. Several mechanisms could account for these findings. They include a more efficient excitation of inhibiting circuits by posteriorly oriented pulses, and a back-propagating D-wave inhibiting early I-waves and thus inducing early inhibition of MEP amplitude. In any case biphasic rTMS results can be explained by a mixture of monophasic opposite stimulations. We propose the use of monophasic pulses for maximizing effects during rTMS.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Organization of ipsilateral excitatory and inhibitory pathways in the human motor cortex.

Motor cortex stimulation has both excitatory and inhibitory effects on ipsilateral muscles. Excitatory effects can be assessed by ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs). Inhibitory effects include an interruption of ipsilateral voluntary muscle activity known as the silent period (iSP) and a reduction in corticospinal excitability evoked by conditioning stimulation of the contralateral motor cortex (interhemispheric inhibition, IHI). Both iSP and IHI may be mediated by transcallosal pathways. Their relationship to the contralateral corticospinal projection and whether iSP and IHI represent the same phenomenon remain unclear. The neuronal population activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is highly dependent on the direction of the induced current in the brain. We examined the relationship among iMEP, iSP, IHI, and the contralateral corticospinal system by examining the effects of different stimulus intensities and current directions. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from both first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. The iSP in the right FDI muscle was obtained by right motor cortex stimulation during voluntary muscle contraction. IHI was examined by conditioning stimulation of the right motor cortex followed by test stimulation of the left motor cortex at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 2-80 ms. The induced current directions tested in the right motor cortex were anterior medial (AM), posterior medial (PM), posterior lateral, and anterior lateral (AL). Contralateral MEPs (cMEPs) had the lowest threshold with the AM direction and the shortest latency with the PM direction. iMEPs were present in 8 of 10 subjects. Both iMEP and IHI did not show significant directional preference. iSP was observed in all subjects with the highest threshold for the AL direction and the longest duration for the AM direction. cMEP, iSP, and IHI all increased with stimulus intensity up to approximately 75% stimulator output. Target muscle activation decreased IHI at 8-ms ISI but had little effect on IHI at 40-ms ISI. iSP and IHI at 8-ms ISI did not correlate at any stimulus intensities and current directions tested, and factor analysis showed that they are explained by different factors. However, active IHI at 40-ms ISI was explained by the same factor as iSP. The different directional preference for cMEP compared with iMEP and IHI suggests that these ipsilateral effects are mediated by populations of cortical neurons that are different from those activating the corticospinal neurons. iSP and IHI do not represent the same phenomenon and should be considered complementary measures of ipsilateral inhibition.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Predominant activation of I1-waves from the leg motor area by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

We performed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elucidate the D- and I-wave components comprising the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited from the leg motor area, especially at near-threshold intensity. Recordings were made from the tibialis anterior muscle using needle electrodes. A figure-of-eight coil was placed so as to induce current in the brain in eight different directions, starting from the posterior-to-anterior direction and rotating it in 45 degrees steps. The latencies were compared with those evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and TMS using a double cone coil. Although the latencies of MEPs ranged from D to I3 waves, the most prominent component evoked by TMS at near-threshold intensity represented the I1 wave. With the double cone coil, the elicited peaks always represented I1 waves, and D waves were evoked only at very high stimulus intensities, suggesting a high effectiveness of this coil in inducing I1 waves. Using the figure-of-eight coil, current flowing anteriorly or toward the hemisphere contralateral to the recorded muscle was more effective in eliciting large responses than current flowing posteriorly or toward the ipsilateral hemisphere. The effective directions induced I1 waves with the lowest threshold, whereas the less effective directions elicited I1 and I2 waves with a similar frequency. Higher stimulus intensities resulted in concomitant activation of D through I3 waves with increasing amount of D waves, but still the predominance of I1 waves was apparent. The amount of I waves, especially of I1 waves, was greater than predicted by the hypothesis that TMS over the leg motor area activates the output cells directly, but rather suggests predominant transsynaptic activation. The results accord with those of recent human epidural recordings.

Electric Stimulation↗
PubMed2004

The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex can evoke several different kinds of descending activity depending on the type of stimulation, the intensity of stimulation and the area of the cortex being stimulated. Thus, transcranial magnetic stimulation preferentially activates different structures than transcranial electrical stimulation. In addition, the response to magnetic stimulation depends on the direction of the induced current in the brain, the waveform of the stimulating current, and the shape of the coil. Stimulation of the lower limb area of motor cortex recruits different elements than stimulation of the upper limb area. These differences occur because different structures in the motor cortex have a differential threshold to the different techniques of stimulation. We have had the opportunity to perform a series of direct recordings of the corticospinal volley evoked by the different techniques of transcranial stimulation from the epidural space of conscious patients with chronically implanted spinal electrodes. These recordings provide insights about the physiological basis of the excitatory and inhibitory phenomena produced by transcranial stimulation.

Efferent Pathways↗
PubMed2003

Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation.

This study investigated the effect of short periods of simultaneous weak anodal direct current (DC) stimulation and peripheral ulnar nerve (ES) stimulation on corticospinal excitability. The experiments involved repeated testing of ten normal subjects with four different protocols: (1) No Stimulation; (2) DC only; (3) ES only; (4) DC plus ES. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded from the First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI); Abductor Digiti Minimi (ADM) and Flexor Carpi Ulnaris (FCU). The baseline MEP amplitude was compared with that obtained immediately after the first set of stimulation, after the second set of stimulation, 15 min post stimulation and 30 min after stimulation. No significant change was seen with the No Stimulation and ES Only protocols. FDI showed a significant change in the DC protocol after the second set of stimulation but the changes were not present 15 or 30 min after. The DC plus ES protocol showed FDI changes that were significant after the second set of stimulation with the elevations persisting when tested 15 and 30 min post intervention. These observations show that a period of anodal DC stimulation preceding a period of ulnar nerve stimulation resulted in significant and persistent elevations in cortical excitability.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine.

D-Cycloserine (CYC), a partial N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) agonist, has been shown to improve cognitive functions in humans. However, the neurophysiological basis of this effect is unclear so far. We studied the impact of this drug on long-lasting after-effects of transcranial direct current (tDCS)-generated motor cortical excitability shifts, as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor-evoked potentials. While anodal tDCS enhances motor cortical excitability, cathodal tDCS diminishes it. Both effects seem to be NMDA receptor dependent. D-CYC selectively potentiated the duration of motor cortical excitability enhancements induced by anodal tDCS. D-CYC alone did not modulate excitability. The potency of this drug to consolidate neuronal excitability enhancements, most probably by stabilizing the strengthening of NMDA receptors, which is a probable neurophysiological derivate of learning processes, makes it an interesting substance to improve cognitive functions.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

In vivo assessment of human visual system connectivity with transcranial electrical stimulation during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to investigate local and distant cerebral activation induced by transcranial electrical stimulation in order to noninvasively map functional connectivity in the human visual system. Stimulation with lateromedially directed currents and the anode 4.5 cm dorsally to the inion over the right visual cortex induced phosphenes extending into the contralateral lower quadrant of the visual field. fMRI showed a focal hemodynamic response underneath the anode in extrastriate cortex and distant coactivation in subcortical (lateral geniculate nucleus), cortical visual (striate and extrastriate), and visuomotor areas (frontal and supplementary eye fields). This pattern of activation resembles a network of presumably interconnected visual and visuomotor areas. Analysis of activation sites supplies new information about cerebral correlates of phosphenes and shows that the cortical region underneath the cranial stimulation site is not necessarily the origin of behavioral and/or perceptual effects of transcranial stimulation. We conclude that combining transcranial electrical stimulation of neural tissue with simultaneous fMRI offers the possibility to study noninvasively cerebral connectivity in the human brain.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Psychosurgery: past, present, and future.

Psychosurgery, the neurosurgical treatment of psychiatric disease, has a history dating back to antiquity, and involves all of the clinical neurosciences. This review discusses the history of psychosurgery, its development in the 19th century, and the conditions of its use and abuse in the 20th century, with a particular focus on the frontal lobotomy. The transition to the modern era of psychosurgery is discussed, as well as the neurobiology underlying current psychosurgical procedures. The techniques of stereotactic cingulotomy, capsulotomy, subcaudate tractotomy, and limbic leukotomy are described, as well their indications and side effects. Due to the past abuse of psychosurgery, procedures are currently under strict control, and the example of the Cingulotomy Committee at the Massachusetts General Hospital is discussed. Finally, future directions of psychosurgery and somatic therapies are explored, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, gene therapy, and stem cell therapy. In summary, this review provides a concise yet comprehensive introduction to the history, current practice, and future trends of neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders.

Brain↗
PubMed1987

Evaluation of conduction in central motor pathways: techniques, pathophysiology, and clinical interpretation.

This communication summarizes the highlights of this symposium and reviews our current understanding of the clinical neurophysiology of conduction in central motor pathways produced by transcranial or direct brain stimulation. Direct (D wave) and indirect (I wave) volleys of descending impulses in the pyramidal system result from motor cortex stimulation and determine the measured responses. The advantages and disadvantages of the electrical and the magnetic stimulating modalities are assessed. The increased latency produced by magnetic as opposed to electrical stimulation is considered. Present clinical applications are discussed. The safety record is encouraging, but has aspects that must be addressed. Potential problems of the interpretation of motor evoked potentials in patients with central nervous system disease are emphasized in light of the pathophysiological mechanism underlying these potentials.

Cerebellum↗
PubMed1993

Determination of current density distributions generated by electrical stimulation of the human cerebral cortex.

With the use of a 3-dimensional finite element model of the human brain based on structural data from MRI scans, we simulated patterns of current flow in the cerebral hemisphere with different types of electrical stimulation. Five different tissue types were incorporated into the model based on conductivities taken from the literature. The boundary value problem derived from Laplace's equation was solved with a quasi-static approximation. Transcranial electrical stimulation with scalp electrodes was poorly focussed and required high levels of current for stimulation of the cortex. Direct cortical stimulation with bipolar (adjacent) electrodes was found to be very effective in producing localized current flows. Unipolar cortical stimulation (with a more distant reference electrode) produced higher current densities at the same stimulating current as did bipolar stimulation, but stimulated a larger region of the cortex. With the simulated electrodes resting on the pia-arachnoid, as usually occurs clinically, there was significant shunting of the current (7/8 of the total current) through the CSF. Possible changes in electrodes and stimulation parameters that might improve stimulation procedures are considered.

Cerebral Cortex↗
PubMed2004

Single pulse stimulation of the human subthalamic nucleus facilitates the motor cortex at short intervals.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). The mechanism is poorly understood. High-frequency STN DBS has been reported to affect motor cortex excitability in a complex way, but the timing between STN stimuli and changes in motor cortical (M1) excitability has not been investigated. We examined the time course of changes in motor cortical excitability following single pulse STN DBS. We studied 14 PD patients with implanted DBS electrodes in the STN, 2 patients with electrodes in internal globus pallidus (GPi), and 1 patient with an electrode in the sensory thalamus. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered to the M1 ipsilateral to the DBS with induced currents either in the anterior-posterior direction in the brain to evoke indirect (I) waves or in the lateral-medial direction to activate corticospinal axons directly. Single pulse stimulation through the DBS contacts preceded the TMS by 0-10 ms. Surface EMG was recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle. Three milliseconds after STN stimulation, the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes produced by anterior-posterior current were significantly larger than control responses, while the responses to lateral-medial currents were unchanged. Similar facilitation also occurred after GPi stimulation, but not with thalamic stimulation. Single pulse STN stimulation facilitates the M1 at short latencies. The possible mechanisms include antidromic excitation of the cortico-STN fibers or transmission through the basal ganglia-thalamocortical pathway.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Examination of the visual system with transcranial magnetic stimulation].

The influence of transcranially applied magnetic stimuli on the function of the afferent (sensory) and efferent (motor) parts of the visual system have been discussed. Excitatory (positive) phenomena are subjective photic sensations (phosphenes) which can be elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over occipital parts of the skull. The phosphenes appear on the left or right side of the visual field depending upon the direction of the coil currents, which determines whether the visual cortex of the right or the left hemisphere is activated. The configuration of the phosphene fields hints at an excitation of the primary visual cortex (Brodmann's area 17). However, magnetic brain stimulation also produces inhibitory (negative) phenomena. When strong magnetic field pulses are applied over the primary visual cortex, foveally presented visual stimuli cannot be identified even when no phosphenes are perceived at the same time. Depending on the position of the stimulation coil, this suppression of perception can be restricted to visual stimuli presented on the right, or left of, above or below the fixation point. No generation or disturbance of eye movements by transcranial magnetic stimulation has been reported before, except for a delay of saccades within a reaction time paradigm.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human primary motor cortex (MI) evokes motor responses in the contralateral limb muscles. The latencies and amplitudes of those responses depend on the direction of induced current in the brain by the stimuli (Mills et al. 1992, Werhahn et al. 1994). This observation suggests that different neural elements might be activated by the differently directed induced currents. Using a figure-of-eight-shaped coil, which induces current with a certain direction, we analyzed the effect of direction of stimulating current on the latencies of responses to TMS in normal subjects. The latencies were measured from surface electromyographic responses of the first dorsal interosseous muscles and the peaks in the peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of single motor units from the same muscles. The coil was placed over the MI, with eight different directions each separated by 45 degrees. Stimulus intensity was adjusted just above the motor threshold while subjects made a weak tonic voluntary contraction, so that we can analyse the most readily elicited descending volley in the pyramidal tracts. In most subjects, TMS with medially and anteriorly directed current in the brain produced responses or a peak that occurred some 1.5 ms later than those to anodal electrical stimulation. In contrast, TMS with laterally and posteriorly directed current produced responses or a peak that occurred about 4.5 ms later. There was a single peak in most of PSTHs under the above stimulation condition, whereas there were occasionally two peaks under the transitional current directions between the above two groups. These results suggest that TMS with medially and anteriorly directed current in the brain readily elicits I1 waves, whereas that with laterally and posteriorly directed current preferentially elicits I3 waves. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies indicated that this direction was related to the course of the central sulcus. TMS with induced current flowing forward relative to the central sulcus preferentially elicited I1 waves and that flowing backward elicited I3 waves. Our finding of the dependence of preferentially activated I waves on the current direction in the brain suggests that different sets of cortical neurons are responsible for different I waves, and are contrarily oriented. The present method using a figure-of-eight-shaped coil must enable us to study physiological characteristics of each I wave separately and, possibly, analyse different neural elements in MI, since it activates a certain I wave selectively without D waves or other I waves.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Studies on transcranial magnetic stimulation--characteristics of the magnetic coil].

I measured the characteristics of several different magnetic coils. In a round coil and a doughnut-shaped coil, induced voltages measured by a longitudinal probe and compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis showed two peak voltages in the former at a point halfway between the coil center and the outer edge, and in the center of the windings in the latter. On the other hand, in a double coil, the maximum induced voltage showed a peak at the center of the coil, and when the coil current was antidromically charged against the median nerve, the distribution of CMAPs was more focal. When the distance from the coil surface was disregarded, the maximum induced voltage spot in the double coil did not move. However, in the other coils, it moved closer to the outer edge. From these findings, it was confirmed that a double coil is the most suitable for focal stimuli. In conclusion, when using magnetic coils, the peak spot of various coils and the direction of the coil current against the target nerve are important.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2006

Neurostimulation in resistant depression.

Drugs and psychotherapy are inadequate for relieving depressive symptoms in a substantial portion of severely depressed patients. In that patient group, neurostimulation techniques such as electroconvulsive therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy, vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation could be lifesaving therapies. Neurostimulation is a physical intervention that utilizes application of either electric current or a magnetic field to directly stimulate the brain or central nervous system. This article presents an overview of currently available neurostimulatory techniques for depression, including a review of their efficacy and safety. Further development and evaluation of non-pharmacological antidepressant therapies are needed, with the hope of improving treatment of refactory depression.

Antidepressive Agents↗