Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sulindac”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Nerve pathology in the type 1 diabetic dog: effects of treatment with sulindac.

The purpose of this study was to define pathological abnormalities in the peripheral nerve of a large animal model of long-duration type 1 diabetes and also to determine the effects of treatment with sulindac. Detailed morphometric studies were performed to define nerve fiber and endoneurial capillary pathology in 6 control dogs, 6 type 1 diabetic dogs treated with insulin, and 6 type 1 diabetic dogs treated with insulin and sulindac for 4 years. Myelinated fiber and regenerative cluster density showed a non-significant trend toward a reduction in diabetic compared to control animals, which was prevented by treatment with sulindac. Unmyelinated fiber density did not differ among groups. However, diabetic animals showed a non-significant trend toward an increase in axon diameter (p < 0.07), with a shift of the size frequency distribution towards larger axons, which was not prevented by treatment with sulindac. Endoneurial capillary density and luminal area showed a non-significant trend toward an increase in diabetic animals, which was prevented with sulindac treatment. Endoneurial capillary basement membrane area was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in diabetic animals, but was not prevented with sulindac treatment. We conclude that the type 1 diabetic dog demonstrates minor structural abnormalities in the nerve fibers and endoneurial capillaries of the sciatic nerve, and treatment with sulindac ameliorates some but not all of these abnormalities.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the formation of hundreds of colorectal adenomas and eventual colorectal cancer. Administration of the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug sulindac has been followed by regression of polyps in patients with this disorder, but no controlled trial of this drug in patients who have not had surgery has been reported. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 22 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, including 18 who had not undergone colectomy. The patients received sulindac at a dose of 150 mg orally twice a day for nine months or identical-appearing placebo tablets. The number and size of the polyps were evaluated every three months for one year. RESULTS: A statistically significant decrease in the mean number of polyps and their mean diameter occurred in patients treated with sulindac, as compared with those given placebo. When treatment was stopped at nine months, the number of polyps had decreased to 44 percent of base-line values and the diameter of the polyps to 35 percent of base-line values (P = 0.014 and P < 0.001, respectively, for the comparison with the changes in the group given placebo). No patient had complete resolution of polyps. Three months after treatment with sulindac was stopped, both the number and the size of the polyps increased in sulindac-treated patients but remained significantly lower than the values at base line. No side effects from sulindac were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac reduces the number and size of colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, but its effect is incomplete, and it is unlikely to replace colectomy as primary therapy.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2005

Sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis in sinonasal cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that sulindac sulfide can induce cell death in maxillary cancer cells, and that sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis is related to the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/p38 MAPK-caspase 3 signaling pathway. OBJECTIVE: Head and neck cancer is the sixth commonest cancer in the human body. Squamous cell carcinoma accounts for most sinonasal cancers. However, little is known regarding the biochemical mechanism(s) of cell death in sinonasal cancers. Recently, human epidemiological and clinical intervention studies have indicated that sulindac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, exhibits chemopreventive activity in colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether sulindac sulfide can induce apoptosis in sinonasal cancer cells and what type of molecular mechanisms induces the death of sinonasal cancer cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sinonasal cancer cells (Asan Medical Center Head and Neck Cancer 5) were treated with various concentrations of sulindac sulfide. The degree of cell death was determined by means of a fluorescence-activated cell scan and the signal transduction pathway for cell death was examined. RESULTS: Human nasal cavity cancer cells treated with sulindac sulfide underwent cell death, and the induction of apoptosis occurred in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis was abolished by treatment with the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors PD98059 and SB203580.

Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones↗
PubMed1997

Comparing sulindac with indomethacin for closure of ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVES: A prospective study comparing the efficacy and side-effects of oral sulindac with intravenous indomethacin in clinically stable preterm infants (< 1750 g) requiring non-invasive closure of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. METHODOLOGY: As maturity and birthweight are the two major determinants of ductal closure, infants were matched as closely as possible for these parameters. An eligible patient was first assigned to the sulindac group and a subsequent patient with similar gestational age (+/-1 week) and birthweight (+/-100 g) to the previously recruited infant would automatically receive indomethacin. A total of eight infants were enrolled in each group. RESULTS: The ductus arteriosus was successfully closed in all eight infants receiving indomethacin, and in seven of eight infants receiving sulindac. No significant differences were found with regards to the ductal size between the two groups at diagnosis or on each of the consecutive days of treatment (P > 0.25). More renal adverse effects were encountered in the indomethacin group. Significant differences in changes from baseline value for urine output, plasma sodium, urea and creatinine concentrations were noted at 24, 48 and 72 h after commencement of treatment between the two groups (P < 0.05). All the parameters returned to normal or pre-treatment levels 48 h after stopping therapy. Unexpectedly, severe gastrointestinal complications were encountered in the sulindac group. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac is capable of promoting ductal constriction in clinically stable preterm infants without compromising the renal function. The spectrum of gastrointestinal complications observed in sulindac treated infants were similar to those described for indomethacin. The use of sulindac for ductal closure in the preterm infant should remain experimental.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Rectal cancer after sulindac therapy for a sporadic adenomatous colonic polyp.

Like adenomatous polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis, some sporadic colorectal polyps have been reported to regress in response to sulindac administration. However, a rapidly growing invasive rectal cancer developed in one of 15 patients with sulindac-treated sporadic adenomatous colorectal polyps 16 months after sulindac treatment. In this patient, both the adenomatous polyp that responded partially to sulindac and the rectal cancer developing after sulindac therapy showed immunostaining for cyclooxygenase-2. Although short term sulindac therapy seems to be able to cause some adenomatous colorectal polyps to regress, 4 months of sulindac therapy may not reliably prevent colorectal cancer development in these patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1988

Deactivation of sulindac-sulphide by human renal microsomes.

The renal metabolism of sulindac-sulphide was studied in subcellular fractions from human kidney. It was shown that renal microsomes, in the presence of NADPH, effectively catalyzed the sulphoxidation of sulindac-sulphide. Also the mitochondrial fraction catalyzed the reaction but at a ten-fold lower rate than the microsomes. Carbon monoxide, metyrapone and n-octylamine did not inhibit renal sulphoxidation of sulindac-sulphide and the reaction could occur in a monooxygenase containing fraction free from NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase. Hydroxylation of lauric acid was studied in microsomes and in the purified monooxygenase containing fraction under the same experimental condition as sulindac-sulphide sulphoxidation. Lauric acid is a substrate known to be metabolized by a renal cytochrome P-450 to 11 and 12-hydroxylated products. This reaction was sensitive to carbon monoxide and did not occur in the absence of NADPH cytochrome P-450 reductase. Based on these results we conclude that cytochrome P-450 plays at the most a limited role in human kidney metabolism of sulindac-sulphide. In contrast, sulphoxidation of sulindac-sulphide was substantially reduced in the presence of methimazole suggesting a role of the flavin-containing monooxygenase in the renal biotransformation of sulindac-sulphide in man.

Female↗
PubMed1996

Sulindac induced regression of colorectal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: evaluation of predictive factors.

BACKGROUND: Sulindac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, causes regression of colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) but the response is variable. Specific clinical factors predictive of sulindac induced regression have not been studied. METHODS: 22 patients with FAP were given sulindac 150 mg orally twice a day. Polyp number and size were determined before treatment and at three months. The relation of nine clinical factors to polyp regression (per cent of baseline polyp number after treatment) was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: After three months of sulindac, polyp number had decreased to 45 per cent of baseline and polyp size to 50 per cent of baseline (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Univariate analysis showed greater polyp regression in older patients (p = 0.004), those with previous colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (p = 0.001), and patients without identifiable mutation of the APC gene responsible for FAP (p = 0.05). With multivariate regression analysis, response to sulindac treatment was associated with previous subtotal colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac treatment seems effective in producing regression of colorectal adenomas of FAP patients with previous subtotal colectomy regardless of baseline polyp number and size. Changed sulindac metabolism, reduced area of the target mucosa, or changed epithelial characteristics after ileorectal anastomosis may explain these findings.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed1999

Rectal epithelial apoptosis in familial adenomatous polyposis patients treated with sulindac.

BACKGROUND: Sulindac regresses colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), although the mechanism of polyp regression is unclear. AIMS: To determine whether differences occur in alteration of rectal epithelial apoptotic index and expression of apoptosis related proteins in FAP patients treated with sulindac compared with placebo. PATIENTS: Twenty one FAP patients; 12 had not undergone colectomy. METHODS: Patients with FAP were treated with sulindac 150 mg orally twice a day for three months (n=10) or placebo (n=11). Colorectal polyp number was determined and biopsies of the normal rectal mucosa were performed before and after three months of treatment. Response to treatment and alteration of the apoptotic ratio (index in base of crypt divided by index in surface epithelium) were evaluated. Bcl-2, bax, p21/WAF-1, and p53 proteins were assessed semiquantitatively by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Significant decreases in polyp number and in the apoptotic ratio were seen in patients treated with sulindac compared with controls. The mean percentage change in polyp number from baseline was -46% in the sulindac group and +13% in the placebo group (p=0.005). Mean percentage change in the apoptotic ratio was -8% and +25% in the sulindac and placebo treated patients, respectively (p=0.004). No differences in expression or compartmentalisation of apoptosis related proteins were noted between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sulindac regression of colorectal adenomas is accompanied by alteration of the rectal epithelial apoptotic ratio with relative increase in apoptosis in surface cells compared with the deeper crypt. The utility of the apoptotic ratio as an intermediate biomarker for colorectal tumorigenesis deserves further study.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2006

Sulindac independently modulates extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase signaling pathways.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Substantial human and animal data support the ability of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to cause regression of existing colon tumors and prevent new tumor formation. The mechanism by which the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac prevents tumor growth is poorly understood and seems complex as sulindac can modulate several growth-related signaling pathways. Sulindac metabolites simultaneously (a) increase cellular cyclic GMP and subsequently activate cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG); (b) activate c-jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK); (c) inhibit extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2); and (d) decrease beta-catenin protein expression at times and doses consistent with apoptosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if PKG, ERK1/2, JNK, and beta-catenin are independent targets for sulindac in vitro. Pharmacologic activation of PKG with YC-1 increases JNK phosphorylation and induces apoptosis in colon cancer cells without modulating ERK1/2 phosphorylation or beta-catenin protein expression. Inhibition of ERK1/2 with U0126 induces apoptosis but fails to activate JNK phosphorylation or down-regulate beta-catenin protein expression. Cotreatment with U0126 and YC-1 synergistically increases apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells and recapitulates the effects of sulindac treatment on ERK1/2, JNK, and beta-catenin. These results indicate that sulindac metabolites modulate ERK1/2 and PKG pathways independently in colon cancer cells and suggest that the full apoptotic effect of sulindac is mediated by more than one pathway. Using similar combinatorial approaches in vivo may provide more effective, less toxic chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic strategies. Such therapies could dramatically reduce the incidence and death rate from colorectal cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Impact of preexisting health conditions on the outcome of an adverse drug reaction alerting program: gastrointestinal disorders before piroxicam and sulindac therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of data concerning preexisting serious gastrointestinal (GI) disorders before piroxicam and sulindac therapy in an acute adverse drug reaction alerting program. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Saskatchewan province's prescription drug and healthcare insurance system covering a population of approximately 1 million. PARTICIPANTS: The first 20,000 new patients who were dispensed piroxicam in 1982 and the first 20,000 patients who were dispensed sulindac in 1979-1981 through the Saskatchewan drug plan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician services and hospitalizations with a diagnosis of peptic ulceration or GI hemorrhage within 30 days of the first piroxicam or sulindac prescription. RESULTS: Rates of physician services for peptic ulceration or GI hemorrhage in the 30 days after starting piroxicam or sulindac therapy for patients who had services or hospitalizations for serious stomach or duodenum disorders in the 90 days before their prescriptions were significantly greater than the corresponding rates for patients without a recent history of these conditions (piroxicam: odds ratio [OR] = 7.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.71 to 10.91; p < 0.001; sulindac: OR = 24.08; 95% CI = 18.99 to 30.54; p < 0.001). Also, the rate of hospitalizations for peptic ulceration or GI hemorrhage in the 30 days after starting sulindac therapy for patients who had services for the conditions in the previous 90 days was significantly greater than the rate for patients who did not (OR = 10.91; 95% CI = 5.70 to 20.87; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of serious GI disorders in patients taking piroxicam and sulindac with a recent history of such disorders were larger than those in the other patients. However, because the proportion of individuals with recent serious GI disorders is small, these differences are lost in an overall assessment of patients taking these drugs. Data regarding preexisting health conditions are essential in adverse drug reaction alerting program and, indeed, in all evaluations of adverse reactions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Influence of K-ras activation on the survival responses of Caco-2 cells to the chemopreventive agents sulindac and difluoromethylornithine.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac and the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) are both potent inhibitors of colon carcinogenesis in experimental models of this disease. The combination of these two agents is undergoing evaluation as a strategy for colon cancer chemoprevention in humans with resected colon polyps. We evaluated the effects of the major sulfide and sulfone metabolites of sulindac and DFMO alone, or in combinations, on the growth and survival of Caco-2 colon cancer-derived cells and in clones of these cells transfected with an activated K-ras oncogene. Both the sulfide and sulfone metabolites of sulindac reduced cell viability, measured by colony-forming assays, primarily by inducing apoptosis. Expression of an activated K-ras oncogene caused cells treated with either sulindac sulfide or sulfone to undergo apoptosis earlier than nontransfected controls. However, clonogenic survival, measured 2 weeks after drug treatment, was the same in both Caco-2 and ras-transfected Caco-2 cells treated with sulindac metabolites. A 24-h treatment with DFMO caused a dose-dependent decrease in the colony-forming ability of cells expressing an activated K-ras but had no effect on the viability of the parental Caco-2 cells. The DFMO-dependent decrease in colony formation in K-ras-activated cells occurred in the absence of apoptosis. Assessment of cell survival by colony-forming assays indicated that these two agents acted in an additive manner when combined. These data indicate that K-ras can influence the kinetics of apoptosis induction by sulindac metabolites and cell survival in response to DFMO. However, cytotoxicity induced by these agents occurs via unique mechanisms. These studies suggest that the combination of DFMO and sulindac may be useful in human cancer prevention strategies.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2005

Selective inhibitors of MEK1/ERK44/42 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases potentiate apoptosis induction by sulindac sulfide in human colon carcinoma cells.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) sulindac prevents experimental colon cancer and can regress precancerous polyps in humans. Sulindac sulfide inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX)-mediated prostaglandin synthesis and retards the growth of cultured colon cell lines primarily by inducing apoptosis. Given the known role of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in signal transduction and the regulation of cell survival and death, we determined the effect of sulindac sulfide on MAPK activation, COX-2 expression, and apoptosis induction in HCA-7 human colon cancer cells. Sulindac sulfide treatment was associated with activation of ERKp44/42 and p38 MAPK in a dosage- and time-dependent manner, and also activated upstream MEK. Similar results were seen in HCT-15 cells and also with the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS398. ERKp44/42 and p38 activation were accompanied by an induction of COX-2 protein expression. Selective inhibitors of sulindac sulfide-induced ERKp44/42 (PD98059) and p38 MAPK (SB203580) activation also suppressed the induction of COX-2 by this NSAID. Furthermore, both MAPK inhibitors significantly augmented sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis, as did suppression of constitutive COX-2 using antisense oligonucleotides. In conclusion, MEK/ERK and p38 MAPK activation mediate COX-2 induction by sulindac sulfide. Selective inhibitors of these MAPKs potentiate apoptosis induction by this NSAID, suggesting a novel strategy for the prevention or treatment of colorectal cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1992

Randomized comparative trial of indomethacin and sulindac for the treatment of refractory preterm labor.

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sulindac in the treatment of preterm labor. Thirty-six women in preterm labor who had failed initial attempts at tocolysis with magnesium sulfate were randomized to receive either oral indomethacin or oral sulindac for 48 hours. The mean gestational ages at admission were 29 and 30 weeks for the sulindac and indomethacin groups, respectively. There was a significantly greater hourly fetal urine output, deepest amniotic fluid pocket, and amniotic fluid index in the sulindac group. A trend toward higher fetal ductus arteriosus flow velocities noted in the indomethacin group was not seen in the sulindac group. The drugs had similar success in delaying delivery for 48 hours or 7 days. The mean birth weights were 2000 and 2323 g for the sulindac and indomethacin groups, respectively. Sulindac appears to be as effective as indomethacin for refractory preterm labor but with fewer fetal side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Sulindac inhibits the rate of growth and appearance of colon tumors in the rat.

Sulindac (cis-5-fluoro-2-methyl-1-[p-(methylsulfinyl) benzylidene] indene-3-acetic acid), an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis, has been reported to cause regression of colon polyps in patients with familial polyposis coli and Gardner's syndrome. We examined the effect of sulindac on the growth of primary colon carcinomas in rats. Colon tumors were induced in 18 rats by repeated subcutaneous administration of dimethylhydrazine. The site and diameter of each tumor were measured via laparotomy and colonoscopy. Rats were randomized to receive either sulindac (10 mg/kg) twice daily or vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose). After 4 weeks of treatment, the site and size of tumors in the colon were again recorded. In eight rats receiving sulindac, no new tumors were identified, while in 10 control rats, 13 additional tumors were found after treatment. There was a significantly greater increase in size of the tumors in the control group (56.4 mm for 26 tumors) compared with the rats receiving sulindac (9.3 mm for 14 tumors). We report that sulindac inhibits the rate of development and the rate of growth of colon tumors in the rat.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1989

Sulindac kinetics and effects on renal function and prostaglandin excretion in renal insufficiency.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of sulindac, a purported "renal sparing" nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and its effects on renal function and prostaglandin excretion in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate. Twelve female patients (glomerular filtration rate 37 +/- 4 mL/min) were treated with sulindac 200 mg bid for 11 days. Urinary PGE2, 6-keto-PGF1 alpha and serum thromboxane (TxB2) generation were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) following extraction on C-18 columns. Glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow were measured by 99TC-DPTA and 131I-para-aminohippuric acid clearance. In six patients serum and urine levels of sulindac and its metabolites were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Sulindac was rapidly absorbed and converted to sulindac sulfide with peak levels 2 hours after a single dose, but steady state levels were not reached prior to drug discontinuation. Sulindac sulfide AUC (0-5 hours micrograms min/mL) progressively increased from 382 to 3,030 on day 11. It did not appear in the urine. Baseline urinary PGE2 and 6-keto-PGF1 alpha excretion were 23.8 +/- 5.6 and 18.9 +/- 2.7 ng/hr respectively and were reduced by 68% and 47% by day 4 of therapy. TxB2 generation fell by 34% after one dose and by 67% by day 11. There was a significant increase in serum creatinine from 1.88 +/- 0.13 mg/dl before treatment to 2.16 +/- 0.15 mg/dL (P less than .05) after eleven days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood Platelets↗
PubMed1988

A protective effect of sulindac against chemically-induced primary colonic tumours in mice.

Sulindac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been reported to lead to tumour regression in cases of human polyposis coli. We have investigated the effects of this drug on the growth of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH)-induced mouse colonic tumours. In one experiment, DMH and oral sulindac were administered concurrently to a group of mice for a period of up to 24 weeks, while a control group of animals received DMH only for the same period. Sulindac caused a significant reduction in both the number of mice with colonic tumours and the number of tumours per mouse. In a second experiment, two groups of mice which had already been treated with DMH for 17 weeks received either sulindac or not for 78 days. In this experiment sulindac had no effect. These results demonstrate that sulindac has a protective effect against the chemical induction of colonic tumours in mice, but does not cause the regression of established tumours.

1,2-Dimethylhydrazine↗
PubMed2001

Sulindac inhibited gene expression and activity of arylamine N-acetyltransferase and DNA-2-aminofluorene adduct formation in T24 human bladder tumor cells.

We demonstrated in vivo that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including sulindac can act as inhibitors of urinary bladder carcinogenesis in rats. The aim of the present study was to determine whether sulindac affects arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT) activity and gene expression and DNA-2-aminofluorene adduct formation in the T24 human bladder tumor cell line. The NAT activity (N-acetylation of 2-aminofluorene) was measured by high performance liquid chromatography assaying for the amount of acetylated 2-aminofluorene and the remaining 2-aminofluorene (AF). The results demonstrated that NAT activity in T24 cells were inhibited by the sulindac in a dose-dependent manner. The apparent values of Km and Vmax of NAT from T24 cells were also decreased by sulindac. This inhibition was not competitive. The amount of DNA-AF adduct formation in T24 cells was also inhibited by sulindac. The data also demonstrated that sulindac inhibited the NAT mRNA level in T24 cells.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Sulindac for periampullary polyps in FAP patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-duodenal polyps develop in up to 90% of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients and periampullary carcinoma is one of the most common extra-colonic malignancies in this syndrome. Periampullary adenomas have been shown to be precursor lesions to periampullary carcinoma. Sulindac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, has been reported to cause regression of rectal polyps in FAP patients, however its role in periampullary polyp regression is unclear. METHODS: In May 1993, a prospective study was begun to evaluate the role of sulindac in prevention of polyp recurrence after resection of large (> 1 cm) duodenal polyps in FAP patients. Eight patients, mean age 50 years (range 35 to 65), with documented large periampullary polyps were placed on sulindac 150 mg twice daily. Prior to enrollment, all patients had their large polyps removed from the periampullary region by interventional endoscopy or by surgery. All patients had multiple small residual duodenal polyps. Follow-up was performed by one experienced endoscopist with a side-viewing video endoscope. Endoscopy was performed 6 monthly. Median follow-up time was 17.5 months (range 10 to 24 months). RESULTS: In 3 patients, sulindac was discontinued due to side effects: abdominal cramps (n = 2) and upper G-I bleeding (n = 1). None of the patients had regression of small periampullary polyps. In addition, one patient developed an invasive periampullary carcinoma while on sulindac and 3 patients developed large recurrent periampullary polyps requiring further treatment. SUMMARY: In our experience, sulindac is of no significant benefit for the control of periampullary polyps in FAP. Effective medical treatment of these polyps is still lacking.

Adenoma↗