Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RHINOVIRUS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

A collaborative report: rhinoviruses--extension of the numbering system from 89 to 100.

To define the number of rhinovirus serotypes, cross neutralization tests and characterization studies were completed on 25 candidate prototype rhinoviruses submitted to a third phase of a collaborative program. Based on the results, 11 distinct prototype strains were designated and the numbering system was extended to include 100 rhinoviruses. In addition, recent evidence indicates that over 90% of rhinoviruses isolated in three areas of the country could be typed with antisera for rhinovirus types 1-89.

Neutralization Tests↗
PubMed1987

An ELISA for the detection of rhinovirus specific antibody in serum and nasal secretion.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) which detects rhinovirus specific antibody in human sera and nasal secretions, has been developed. This sandwich ELISA utilizes a rabbit antirhinovirus hyperimmune serum as the capture antibody and was found to be very sensitive, detecting rhinovirus specific antibody in the serum at dilutions of 1:10(6) and 1:10(3.5) for IgG and IgA immunoglobulins, respectively. Thus, this new assay is 10(2)-10(4) times more sensitive than our standard neutralization test. Furthermore, this increase in sensitivity has enabled us to reliably detect rhinovirus specific immunoglobulins in unconcentrated nasal washings, which are thought to be particularly important for protection against rhinovirus reinfection. A preliminary study of the immune response in human volunteers challenged with rhinovirus using this new ELISA system is presented and further applications and potential of the method are also discussed.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed1990

Detection of rhinovirus RNA in nasal epithelial cells by in situ hybridization.

This paper describes the development and evaluation of in situ hybridization (ISH) for the detection of rhinovirus in cells obtained from nasal washings of volunteers infected with human rhinovirus 14 (HRV-14). Twenty-five (66%) and 27 (71%) of 38 volunteers inoculated with HRV-14 had evidence of infection by virus isolation and ISH, respectively, on at least one of 4 days investigated after virus challenge. In contrast, only 14 of 38 (37%) volunteers had significant antibody rises as detected by the neutralization test. Of the 38 volunteers inoculated with HRV-14, only 13 (34%) had symptoms of colds. Of these, 12 (92%) and 10 (77%) were positive by virus isolation or ISH, respectively, on at least one day. Six (46%) had significant antibody rises by neutralization. Similarly, of the 38 volunteers challenged, 22 (58%) were asymptomatic and of these 10 (45.5%) and 12 (54.5%) were positive by virus isolation and ISH, respectively, on at least one day. Only 8 (36.4%) of these asymptomatic volunteers showed significant antibody rises by neutralization. There were significant associations between the detection of rhinoviruses by ISH and virus isolation on the third day (P less than 0.025) after virus challenge in the group as a whole and in the symptomatic group. These results show that generally rhinovirus detection by ISH compares well with virus isolation and both tests are clearly more sensitive than the neutralization test in detecting evidence of infection. It is concluded that ISH is an interesting new technique that may play an important role in the study of rhinovirus infection and pathogenesis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The role of rhinovirus in asthma exacerbations.

Rhinoviruses are a major cause of asthma exacerbations in children and adults. With the use of sensitive RT-PCR methods, respiratory viruses are found in approximately 80% of wheezing episodes in children and in approximately one half of such episodes in adults. Rhinovirus is a member of the family Picornaviridae, and acute rhinovirus infections occur predominantly in the upper airway. This virus has also been identified in the lower airway, and it might cause acute wheezing through the production of proinflammatory mediators with a resulting neutrophilic inflammatory response. Precisely how this process leads to increases in airway hyperresponsiveness and airway obstruction is not fully established. However, risk factors for wheezing with colds include asthma and atopy, extremes in age, and perhaps having a deficient TH1 response to rhinovirus. With the use of in vitro models and experimental inoculation studies, significant advances have led to a better understanding of the mechanisms by which rhinovirus infections cause asthma exacerbations. Advances in our understanding of this interaction might provide knowledge that could ultimately lead to specific treatment modalities to prevent and/or treat this significant burden of asthma exacerbations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Rhinovirus illnesses during infancy predict subsequent childhood wheezing.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of viral respiratory infections during infancy to the development of subsequent wheezing and/or allergic diseases in early childhood is not established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate these relationships prospectively from birth to 3 years of age in 285 children genetically at high risk for developing allergic respiratory diseases. METHODS: By using nasal lavage, the relationship of timing, severity, and etiology of viral respiratory infections during infancy to wheezing in the 3rd year of life was evaluated. In addition, genetic and environmental factors that could modify risk of infections and wheezing prevalence were analyzed. RESULTS: Risk factors for 3rd year wheezing were passive smoke exposure (odds ratio [OR]=2.1), older siblings (OR=2.5), allergic sensitization to foods at age 1 year (OR=2.0), any moderate to severe respiratory illness without wheezing during infancy (OR=3.6), and at least 1 wheezing illness with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV; OR=3.0), rhinovirus (OR=10) and/or non-rhinovirus/RSV pathogens (OR=3.9) during infancy. When viral etiology was considered, 1st-year wheezing illnesses caused by rhinovirus infection were the strongest predictor of subsequent 3rd year wheezing (OR=6.6; P < .0001). Moreover, 63% of infants who wheezed during rhinovirus seasons continued to wheeze in the 3rd year of life, compared with only 20% of all other infants (OR=6.6; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In this population of children at increased risk of developing allergies and asthma, the most significant risk factor for the development of preschool childhood wheezing is the occurrence of symptomatic rhinovirus illnesses during infancy that are clinically and prognostically informative based on their seasonal nature.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed2004

Viral titers in nasal lining fluid compared to viral titers in nasal washes during experimental rhinovirus infection.

BACKGROUND: The concentration of rhinovirus in nasal wash specimens from infected volunteers peaks at 48-72 h after inoculation. The volume of expelled nasal fluid peaks at the same time, raising the question of whether the viral concentration in nasal wash reflects viral replication in nasal cells or merely the production of an increased volume of nasal fluid during a cold. OBJECTIVES: To determine the amount of rhinovirus in nasal lining fluid during colds before the nasal fluid has been diluted in a nasal wash. STUDY DESIGN: Rhinovirus titers were determined in nasal wash specimens collected daily for five days from 14 subjects with type16 rhinovirus infection. The urea concentration in nasal lining fluid equals that in blood. By determining the urea concentration in a nasal wash and comparing it to the urea concentration in blood from the same subject, it was possible to determine the amount of dilution of the nasal lining fluid. The dilution factor (reciprocal of the dilution) was then used to calculate the viral concentration in undiluted nasal lining fluid. RESULTS: The dilution factor in 70 nasal washes varied from 5 to 64. The viral GMTs (+S.E.) in nasal washes were 1.79 (+0.3) TCID(50)/ml at 24 h, 3.11 (+0.15) at 48 h, and 2.61 (+0.3) at 72 h. The viral GMTs in nasal lining fluid, based on urea adjusted values, paralleled those in nasal washes but were approximately one log higher. Virus concentrations returned to near baseline values by day 5. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal pattern of rhinovirus shedding observed in nasal wash specimens, with a peak in virus concentration at 48-72 h after infection, is a true indication of virus production in nasal cells and not an artifact of the increased amount of nasal fluid produced during the early phase of a cold.

Common Cold↗
PubMed2000

Effect of clarithromycin on experimental rhinovirus-16 colds: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Macrolide antibiotics are frequently prescribed to patients with symptoms of a common cold. Despite their lack of proven antiviral activity, macrolide antibiotics may have anti-inflammatory actions, such as inhibition of mucus secretion and production of interleukins 6 and 8 by epithelial cells. Because the symptoms of rhinovirus colds are attributed to the inflammatory response to infection, we studied the effects of treatment with clarithromycin on the symptomatic and inflammatory response to nasal inoculation with rhinovirus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blind, controlled trial in 24 healthy subjects who were seronegative for antibodies to rhinovirus-16. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either clarithromycin (500 mg) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (800/160 mg, as a control antibiotic) twice a day for 8 days, beginning 24 hours before inoculation with rhinovirus-16. RESULTS: All 12 subjects in each group were infected and developed symptomatic colds. The groups did not differ in the intensity of cold symptoms (median [25th to 75th percentile] score in the clarithromycin group of 25 [5 to 33] versus 21 [11 to 26] in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole group, P = 0.86), weight of nasal secretions (25 g [8 to 56 g] versus 12 g [5 to 28 g], P = 0.27), or decline in nasal peak flow during the 8 days following viral inoculation. In both groups, similar and significant increases from baseline were observed in the numbers of total cells and neutrophils, and in the concentrations of interleukins 6 and 8, in nasal lavage fluid during the cold. The changes that we observed did not differ from those in an untreated historical control group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that clarithromycin treatment has little or no effect on the severity of cold symptoms or the intensity of neutrophilic nasal inflammation in experimental rhinovirus-16 colds.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Clinical virology of rhinoviruses.

Rhinoviruses cause more infections in humans than any other micro-organism. These acid-sensitive picornaviruses infect epithelial cells following inoculation onto the nasal mucosa and are detected reliably in nasopharyngeal secretions. Rhinovirus colds occur year round, with a peak of illness in the fall. Type-specific serum antibody correlates with protection against infection. The fact that there are at least 100 different immunotypes makes development of an effective vaccine unlikely. Nasopharyngeal secretions must be sampled for detection of rhinovirus by culture or RT-PCR. Efficient isolation of virus requires inoculation into two different types of sensitive cell cultures (i.e., fibroblasts and HeLa cells). RT of conserved sequences in the 5' noncoding region of the viral RNA to produce cDNA for PCR amplification has been coupled with detection of amplimers either by gel electrophoresis after nested PCR or by hybridization with labeled oligonucleotide probes to detect one viral genome in samples. In two studies in which both RT-PCR and cell cultures were used, virtually all of the positives were identified with RT-PCR; culture in two cell lines identified 75-80% of the positives. In year-round surveillance, 50% of colds in adults and children were rhinovirus positive. The symptoms occurring during rhinovirus colds are caused by the host's response to the virus, not by the virus itself. Elaboration of cytokines by infected epithelial cells is central to symptom pathogenesis.

Common Cold↗
PubMed2004

Real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of entero- and rhinovirus infections using LightCycler.

BACKGROUND: PCR techniques have proved to be more sensitive than traditional cell culture in the diagnosis of enterovirus and rhinovirus infections and are widely used in clinical virus laboratories. However, PCR assays are relatively time-consuming and labor intensive, particularly if separate hybridization steps are used to confirm the specificity of positive findings. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to develop fast and sensitive real-time PCR assay, which would allow simultaneous detection of entero- and rhinoviruses and their quantification in clinical and experimental samples. STUDY DESIGN: Two real-time RT-PCR protocols were developed using LightCycler (LC) technology; SYBRGreen and hybridization probe assays. The sensitivity of these assays to detect entero- and rhinoviruses was compared with that of a traditional reference RT-PCR-hybridization assay and cell culture. All PCR protocols used the same primers amplifying the 5'-non coding region (NCR) of entero- and rhinoviruses. The LC probe assay and the reference RT-PCR used almost identical detection probes, which bind to enterovirus specific amplicons. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Both real-time PCR assays were equally sensitive as the reference RT-PCR-assay and all were more sensitive than cell culture. Both real-time assays quantified reliably the amount of the virus and took much shorter time than the reference RT-PCR. As the real-time SYBRGreen assay detects both entero- and rhinoviruses it can be used for primary screening of samples, which can be positive for either of these viruses. The real-time probe-assay can confirm the presence of enterovirus in SYBRGreen positive samples or it can be used for selective screening of enteroviruses e.g. from CSF samples.

5' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed2000

Experimental rhinovirus 16 infection increases intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in bronchial epithelium of asthmatics regardless of inhaled steroid treatment.

BACKGROUND: Rhinovirus infections in airway epithelial cells in vitro have been shown to upregulate intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression. Epithelial ICAM-1, in its dual role as the major rhinovirus receptor and as adhesion molecule for inflammatory cells may be involved in the pathogenesis of rhinovirus-induced exacerbations of asthma. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of experimental rhinovirus 16 (RV16) infection on ICAM-1 expression in bronchial mucosal biopsies in asthma. In addition, the effect of 2 weeks pretreatment with inhaled budesonide (800 microg b.d.) on RV16-associated changes in ICAM-1 expression was studied. METHODS: The study had a parallel, placebo-controlled design in 25 steroid-naive nonsmoking atopic asthmatic subjects. After 2 weeks budesonide (BUD) or placebo (PLAC) pretreatment bronchoscopy was performed 2 days before (day -2) and 6 days after (day 6) RV16 inoculation (on days 0 and 1). Immunohistochemical staining for ICAM-1 was performed on snap-frozen bronchial biopsies. ICAM-1 staining intensity on the basal epithelial cells was scored semiquantitatively from 1 (weak) to 3 (intense). Similarly, epithelial intactness was noted (1 = basal cells only, 2 = basal and parabasal cells, 3 = intact epithelium). RESULTS: ICAM-1 scores were not significantly different between the groups at day -2 (P > or = 0.08). Subsequent RV16 infection was associated with a trend towards an increase in ICAM-1 expression in the BUD-group (P = 0.07), whereas the increase was significant in the PLAC-group (P = 0.03). However, the increase was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.74). Epithelial intactness score was not different between the groups before RV16 infection (P > or = 0.07), and no significant changes were observed in either group (P > or = 0.59). Moreover, ICAM-1 score did not correlate significantly with epithelium score in either group, at any time-point (P > or = 0.27). CONCLUSION: We conclude that an RV16 common cold in atopic asthmatic subjects is associated with increased ICAM-1 expression in the bronchial epithelium, which is not related to epithelial intactness. Glucocorticoid treatment does not appear to prevent the RV16-associated increased ICAM-1 expression. This suggests that other treatment modalities are required to protect against the spreading of infection during rhinovirus-induced exacerbations in asthma.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

Respiratory epithelial cell expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and its up-regulation by rhinovirus infection via NF-kappaB and GATA transcription factors.

Virus infections, the majority of which are rhinovirus infections, are the major cause of asthma exacerbations. Asthma now affects one-fifth of the population, yet treatment of exacerbations is unsatisfactory, and the pathogenesis is unclear. Intraepithelial lymphocyte and eosinophil infiltration and activation are strongly implicated, but the mechanisms regulating these processes are unknown. We hypothesized that lower airway epithelial expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) may be important in intraepithelial inflammation and that expression would be induced by pro-inflammatory stimuli and rhinovirus infection. We investigated respiratory epithelial cell VCAM-1 expression and its regulation to identify new targets for treatment of virus-induced asthma exacerbations. We observed constitutive respiratory epithelial cell VCAM-1 expression and that rhinovirus infection, but no other pro-inflammatory stimuli tested increased VCAM-1 cell surface expression in respiratory epithelial cell lines and primary bronchial epithelial cells. We then observed rhinovirus induction of VCAM-1 mRNA expression, promoter activity, and mRNA transcription. Rhinovirus induction of VCAM-1 promoter activity was critically dependent on up-regulation of proteins binding to the -254/-251 and -239/-236 GATA-binding sites and to the -72/-63 and -57/-48 NF-kappaB-binding sites in the VCAM-1 promoter. These studies identify VCAM-1 and the NF-kappaB and GATA transcription factor families as new targets for development of therapeutic interventions for virus-induced asthma exacerbations.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Rhinoviruses infect human epithelial cells via ceramide-enriched membrane platforms.

The cell membrane contains very small distinct membrane domains enriched of sphingomyelin and cholesterol that are named rafts. We have shown that the formation of ceramide via activation of the acid sphingomyelinase transforms rafts into ceramide-enriched membrane platforms. These platforms are required for infection of mammalian cells with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, or Neisseriae gonorrhoeae. In the present study we determined whether the acid sphingomyelinase, ceramide, and ceramide-enriched membrane platforms are also involved in the infection of human cells with pathogenic rhinoviruses. We demonstrate that infection of human epithelial cells with several rhinovirus strains triggers a rapid activation of the acid sphingomyelinase correlating with microtubules- and microfilament-mediated translocation of the enzyme from an intracellular compartment onto the extracellular leaflet of the cell membrane. The activity of the acid sphingomyelinase results in the formation of ceramide in the cell membrane and, finally, large ceramide-enriched membrane platforms. Rhinoviruses colocalize with ceramide-enriched membrane platforms during the infection. The significance of ceramide-enriched membrane platforms for rhinoviral uptake is demonstrated by the finding that genetic deficiency or pharmacological inhibition of the acid sphingomyelinase prevented infection of human epithelial cells by rhinoviruses. The data identify the acid sphingomyelinase and ceramide as key molecules for the infection of human cells with rhinoviruses.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗
PubMed2000

Rhinovirus infection induces major histocompatibility complex class I and costimulatory molecule upregulation on respiratory epithelial cells.

Human respiratory epithelial cells may act as antigen-presenting cells during respiratory viral infections. In addition to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, antigen presentation requires participation of costimulatory molecules. Here the authors investigated class I and class II antigens and B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory molecule expression in human A549 pulmonary epithelial cells and primary bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) at baseline and after rhinovirus infection. Constitutive expression of MHC class I and B7-1 molecules was observed on both cell types. MHC class I molecules were up-regulated by rhinovirus infection, while B7-1 was up-regulated only on A549 cells. B7-2 molecules were constitutively expressed at a low level and were up-regulated by rhinovirus only on HBECs. Rhinovirus induction of antigen-presenting molecule expression on A549 cells was accompanied by cellular activation in terms of induction of release of the chemokines RANTES and Groalpha. These data show that respiratory epithelium expresses full antigen-presentation machinery and that rhinovirus infection up-regulates this expression.

Bronchi↗
PubMed2000

Rhinoviruses infect the lower airways.

Rhinoviruses are the major cause of the common cold and a trigger of acute asthma exacerbations. Whether these exacerbations result from direct infection of the lower airway or from indirect mechanisms consequent on infection of the upper airway alone is currently unknown. Lower respiratory infection was investigated in vitro by exposing primary human bronchial epithelial cells to rhinoviruses and in vivo after experimental upper respiratory infection of human volunteers. Bronchial infection was confirmed by both approaches. Furthermore, rhinoviruses induced production of interleukin-6, -8, and -16 and RANTES and were cytotoxic to cultured respiratory epithelium. This evidence strongly supports a direct lower respiratory epithelial reaction as the initial event in the induction of rhinovirus-mediated asthma exacerbations. The frequency of infection and the nature of the inflammatory response observed are similar to those of the upper respiratory tract, suggesting that rhinovirus infections may be one of the most important causes of lower in addition to upper respiratory disease.

Bronchi↗
PubMed1976

Sensitivity of rhinoviruses to human leukocyte and fibroblast interferons.

Rhinoviruses were tested for sensitivity to human interferon from two sources: human leukosytes induced with Sendai virus and human diploid fibroblasts induced with polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid. Twenty-five serotypes of rhinovirus were tested against fibroblast interferon in HeLa cells, and five serotypes were evaluated in fibroblast cultures against fibroblast and leukocyte interferons. Sensitivity varied widely in the HeLa cell assay; rhinovirus type 10 was inhibited by approximately 20-40 units of interferon, whereas rhinovirus type 15 was not inhibited by 5,120 units; the significance of this observation is unclear. In contrast, when fibroblast cultures were used in the assay system, five selected serotypes, including rhinovirus types 10 and 15, had similar levels of sensitivity (0.5-5.0 units) to fibroblast or leukocyte interferon.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2005

Virucidal hand treatments for prevention of rhinovirus infection.

Rhinovirus infections are associated with substantial morbidity and economic cost. The available common cold remedies are of limited utility and specific antiviral approaches have been unsuccessful. Viral contamination of the hands appears to play an important role in the transmission of rhinovirus from person-to-person. Interruption of this step in transmission presents a potential target for intervention. Initial studies demonstrated that the common cold could be prevented by treatment of hands with iodine. Inactivation of the rhinoviruses by acid is well known and a survey of organic acids considered safe for consumer use revealed that salicylic acid and pyroglutamic acid have potent virucidal activity for the rhinoviruses that persists for several hours after application to the hands. A subsequent evaluation in human volunteers confirmed the prevention of rhinovirus infections by these acids and suggested that these agents have promise as cosmetically acceptable virucidal agents for interruption of the transmission of these infections.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of the efficacy of prednisolone in early wheezing induced by rhinovirus or respiratory syncytial virus.

BACKGROUND: The role of systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of early childhood wheezing in children is not clear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether prednisolone is effective in rhinovirus-induced early wheezing. METHODS: We conducted a controlled trial comparing oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg per day in three divided doses for 3 days) with placebo in 78 hospitalized children (mean age, 1.1 year; standard deviation, 0.7) experiencing their first or second episode of wheezing induced by rhinovirus or respiratory syncytial virus. Mixed viral infections were excluded. Our primary end point was the time until the patient was ready for discharge; secondary end points included oxygen saturation during hospitalization, duration of symptoms, occurrence of relapses during the next 2 months and blood eosinophil counts at discharge and 2 weeks later. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analysis, prednisolone did not influence the time until ready for discharge, but it decreased relapses during the subsequent 2-month period in rhinovirus-affected children (prednisolone versus placebo, 22% versus 56%; odds ratio, 19.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-144.03; P = 0.004) and in children with blood eosinophils > or = 0.2 x 10/L (respectively, 24% versus 71%; odds ratio, 10.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-56.22; P = 0.006). Rhinovirus-affected children had more blood eosinophils on admission (mean, 0.44 versus 0.086 x 10/L), had a higher prevalence of atopy (44% versus 8%) and were older (mean, 1.4 versus 0.9 years, P < 0.001 for all) than respiratory syncytial virus-infected children. CONCLUSION: Prednisolone reduced relapses during a 2-month period after first episodes of wheezing associated with rhinovirus infection or blood eosinophils > or = 0.2 x 10/L.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1983

Inhibition of an early stage of rhinovirus replication by dichloroflavan (BW683C).

The mechanism of action of a new anti-rhinovirus compound, dichloroflavan, was examined using a variety of techniques. Dichloroflavan was shown to bind to the highly sensitive rhinovirus type 1B (50% inhibitory concentration 0.007 microM) and at a much lower level to the insensitive rhinovirus type 4 (50% inhibitory concentration greater than 25 microM). Binding of the compound to rhinovirus 1B was accompanied by a reduction (about 0.5 log10 units) in virus infectivity which could be restored by treatment with chloroform. Maximum inhibition of virus yield (about 2 log10 units) occurred only when compound and virus were added together, but some inhibition (about 0.7 log10 units) occurred even when the compound was added near the end of a single cycle of replication. This late reduction in infectivity could be abolished by treating with chloroform, and was therefore caused by the compound binding to progeny virus. The compound did not interfere with adsorption of virus to cells, nor with uncoating of the viral RNA. However, little or no viral RNA and protein synthesis occurred in the presence of dichloroflavan provided that the compound was added with the virus. Addition of the compound after virus adsorption had no effect on either viral RNA or protein synthesis. These results indicate that dichloroflavan binds directly to rhinovirus 1B and appears to prevent virus replication at a point immediately after uncoating of the viral RNA.

Flavonoids↗