Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RESUSCITATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Deferred consent: use in clinical resuscitation research. Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group.

Deferred consent, a new approach to the requirement for informed consent in clinical research, was used in a randomized clinical trial of brain resuscitation after cardiac arrest. Because patients were comatose and therapy had to be initiated immediately, traditional prospective consent usually could not be obtained. Using the deferred consent mechanism, family members were contacted after the first dose of experimental drug or placebo was administered and asked to consent for continued study participation. The vast majority of families were satisfied with the deferred consent mechanism. Their main concerns were about the safety of the experimental drug and whether the active drug or placebo was given. The concepts of randomization, blinding, and placebo-treated controls were generally not well understood. Although our experiences confirmed the impracticality of attempting to obtain traditional prospective consent in clinical resuscitation research, deferred consent was found to be a reasonable solution.

Ethics, Medical↗

The influence of new guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions. Five cycles of audit of a clerk proforma which included a resuscitation decision.

Current guidelines advise discussion with patients before issuing a 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) order. We report five audit cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) documentation after introducing a proforma, the last cycle following the latest guidelines. In first audit data were collected from 75 patient discharges. CPR decisions were documented in 27 (36%). Four subsequent point prevalence audits carried out on all inpatients following proforma introduction showed documentation improved to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 131/140 (94%) and 102/119 (86%) in cycles two, three, four and five, respectively. The last three audits also revealed that consultants consistently made more DNAR orders than trainee doctors. However, following the introduction of the latest guidelines the proportion of patients in whom a decision was made, and the percentage of those decisions that were DNAR, fell.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗

An outcomes analysis of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the futility rationale for do not resuscitate orders.

PURPOSE: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a frequently performed medical intervention in hospitalized patients who die. Despite the widespread use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders during the last decade, the outcome following CPR appears not to have improved. The key to an improved outcome may be better patient selection. The objective of this study was to determine the hospital survival rate following CPR in the era of DNR orders, and to identify risk factors predictive of hospital survival at a university-affiliated teaching hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the code sheets and patient charts of all patients who underwent CPR during a 4-year period from January 1991 to January 1995. Three-hundred-and-eight patients were identified. RESULTS: CPR was successful in 99 (32%) patients, with 41 (13%) patients surviving to hospital discharge. All the patients who survived were otherwise "healthy" with reversible conditions, who experienced a sudden and unexpected arrhythmic event. No pre-arrest risk factors could clearly distinguish the hospital survivors from the nonsurvivors. The length of the code was 9.4 +/- 4 minutes in the hospital survivors compared with 26.6 +/- 19.1 minutes in the nonsurvivors. Patients whose initial rhythm was either ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation had a better survival rate than patients with other rhythms. CONCLUSION: DNR protocols do not prevent CPR being performed on patients who are unlikely to survive to hospital discharge. CPR should only be offered to patients who are likely to derive benefit from this intervention.

Adolescent↗

Clinical decision making during resuscitation and guidelines for termination of the resuscitation effort.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the appropriate intervention to sustain respiratory and circulatory functions in patients with diseases that are potentially reversible; while CPR is unequivocally inappropriate for patients with terminal diseases when there is a consensus of medical opinion that is no reasonable likelihood of meaningful survival. In practical application patients and their families seek guidance based on understanding. CPR when employed without expectations of benefit, will be likely to further compromise neurological function, produce iatrogenic injury, and add discomfort to the dying patient. The decision not to resuscitate remains a reasoned medical judgement. In some condition, transferring the patient with terminal diseases to an alternate physician or institution is ultimately respectful both for the patient and of physician.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗

ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION AND ARTIFICIAL CIRCULATION: TRAINING EXPERIENCES--PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF EMERGENCY RESUSCITATION AND POST-RESUSCITATION CARE.

A training program in the newer methods of treatment of acute cardiopulmonary emergencies which was developed at the University Hospital, University of Saskatchewan, is reported. Artificial respiration by the chance rescuer, primary and secondary resuscitation, and post-resuscitation measures involving the use of special drugs and equipment by trained personnel are described. Figures and tables designed for wall-mounting and ready reference in an emergency situation are presented. Firstaid ventilatory adjuncts for use by trained personnel are classified and critically appraised, and the propriety of their use is emphasized. A plea is made to the medical profession and allied agencies to assume the responsibility of spreading knowledge of the new techniques more widely. Unless effective treatment is instituted early enough to prevent death or permanent anoxic damage to heart and brain, follow-through therapy will often be fruitless.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

How misconceptions among elderly patients regarding survival outcomes of inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation affect do-not-resuscitate orders.

CONTEXT: On hospital admission, many elderly patients make the decision to enact a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. However, few studies have evaluated the beliefs of elderly patients regarding the likelihood of surviving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if it should become necessary during their hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: To quantify elderly patients' beliefs about their chances of survival to discharge following CPR; to ascertain the sources of information that may lead to these beliefs; and to determine how these beliefs affect decisions regarding DNR orders. METHODS: An oral standardized survey was administered to 100 patients aged 70 years or older. Patients were randomly selected from the emergency department, internal medicine clinic, and general medical wards at one urban medical center. RESULTS: Most respondents (81%) believed that their chance of surviving inpatient CPR and leaving the hospital was 50% or better, and 23% of those respondents believed that their chance was 90% or better. Forty-four percent of patients reported having a standing DNR order. Most patients reported obtaining healthcare information from television, physicians, or both. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients often hold erroneous beliefs regarding the outcomes of inpatient CPR. A significant number of our participants had standing DNR orders despite demonstrating extremely optimistic beliefs about CPR. Educating patients and their families about these poor outcomes would allow them to make more informed decisions regarding end-of-life issues.

Aged↗

Decision making to cease or to continue cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group.

CPR should be initiated in any patient who has a cardiac arrest. This might improve overall outcome but implies that CPR is started in patients without any virtual chance for long-term survival (LTS). The aim of this study is, by analysing retrospectively 2713 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (CA), to identify indices which might be of help in the decision making to continue or to discontinue CPR. In an important number of unsuccessful CPR attempts ALS-time did not exceed 20 min. This occurred more frequently in subgroups where limited chances of LTS are expected on clinical grounds. The decision to cease CPR might have been based on other clinical and/or ethical parameters which were not recorded in the registry. This behavior results in a "self-fulfilling prophecy". A subset of patients with limited chances for LTS (0/405) can be identified: patients in electromechanical dissociation (EMD) or asystole on arrival of the mobile intensive care unit (MICU) team, without pupil reaction to light during CPR and with inefficient cardiac massage by the MICU (405/2713). Other patients in EMD or asystole without pupil reaction to light during CPR (1373/2713) but with efficient ECC should be resuscitated for more than 30 min, especially if the patient is gasping during CPR (LTS 27/1373). Patients in EMD or asystole on arrival of the MICU with pupil reaction to light during CPR (236/2713) should have an ALS-time of at least 45 min (LTS 42/236). Cardiac arrests in ventricular fibrillation (VF) (699/2713) should be resuscitated for at least 45 min, especially when gasping during CPR (LTS 119/699).

Ambulances↗

Early prognostic indices after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group.

An early prediction score (EPS) is constructed as the sum of five events: the type of cardiac arrest is ventricular fibrillation; the type of respiratory arrest is gasping; pupil reaction is unequal, slow or normal, but present; swallowing activity is present and the cardiac arrest has been witnessed. Presence of any of these events contributes one point to the score, while absence contributes nothing to it. EPS during resuscitation results in a comparable amount of information, whether used to predict success, alive and conscious 14 days post-CPR or no-success. EPS early (10 min) after initially successful resuscitation is more effective in predicting no-success than success. EPS during CPR does not allow decision making as far as stopping or continuing CPR efforts. EPS early after CPR does neither allow decision making as far as stopping or continuing critical care efforts after initially successful CPR. EPS does, however, weigh the likelihood of success against that of no-success, which can be used when discussing the chances of the patient with his relatives.

Deglutition↗

In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: patient, arrest and resuscitation factors associated with survival.

Data on 470 adults with single in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitations were analyzed to determine 24-h and discharge survival rates and to identify significant correlates of survival. One hundred fifty-three (33%) patients were alive 24 h after initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation; 69 (45% of 24-h survivors, 15% of all patients) were discharged alive. Logit analysis identified the following independently significant correlates of 24-h survival: arrest locations other than emergency room or cardiac care unit, CPR duration less than 15 min, non-cardiac primary diagnosis, non-asystolic dysrhythmia, less than one intravenous and one drip-administered inotrope and absence of pacemaker insertion and defibrillation. Fifty-one (94%) of 54 patients with all of these characteristics were alive 24 h after initiation of CPR. The same variables, as well as age less than 68 years and absence of intubation were statistically associated with discharge survival. Nine (64%) of 14 patients with all of these characteristics were discharged alive. Increased intervention was generally associated with increased mortality. Overall survival rates replicate previous reports and may reflect the effects of diagnosis-related groups policies on the average illness severity of the in-patient population, rather than failure of current CPR methods to improve the probability of survival. Use of the data as baseline for future studies and as a source of hypotheses for research on decision making are discussed.

Aged↗

Evaluation of isoproterenol in patients undergoing resuscitation for out-of-hospital asystolic cardiac arrest (the Israel Resuscitation with Isoproterenol Study Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial).

The Israel Resuscitation with Isoproterenol Study included 79 consecutive patients with witnessed out-of-hospital asystolic cardiac arrest who were resuscitated with epinephrine and atropine and randomized to receive additional isoproterenol or no isoproterenol. The rate of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital admission did not differ in patients receiving standard therapy and those receiving additional isoproterenol.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Intrapulmonary epinephrine during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved regional blood flow and resuscitation in dogs.

Blood flow to vital organs was measured at five-minute intervals during 20 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and ventricular fibrillation in two groups of anesthetized dogs (n = 15 per group). The relationship between organ blood flow and restoration of circulation after 20 minutes was assessed with no additional treatment in Group I and with intrapulmonary epinephrine in Group II. Cardiac output and organ blood flow did not vary significantly in Group I. In Group II, intrapulmonary epinephrine significantly improved blood flow to the myocardium, the brain, and the adrenals. A mean myocardial blood flow of less than 0.13 mL/min/g resulted in no survival, while a flow of greater than 0.16 mL/min/g resulted in survival. These studies show that a critical level of myocardial blood flow is required to restore ability of the heart to function as a pump after prolonged CPR, and that a drug that increases flow improves resuscitation efforts.

Animals↗

Bystander initiated actions in out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: results from the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study (ARRESUST).

The objective of this study was to analyze the functioning of the first two links of the chain of survival: 'access' and 'basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)'. In a prospective study, all bystander witnessed circulatory arrests resuscitated by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel, were recorded consecutively. Univariate differences in survival were calculated for various witnesses, the performance of basic CPR, the quality of CPR, the performers of CPR and the delays. A logistic regression model for survival was developed from all potential predictors of these first two links. From the 922 included patients, 93 survived to hospital discharge. In 21% of the cases, the witness did not immediately call 112, but first called others, resulting in a longer delay and a lower survival. Family members were frequent witnesses of the arrest (44%), but seldom started basic CPR (11%). Survival, when basic CPR performers were untrained and had no previous experience, was similar to that when no basic CPR was performed (6%). Not performing basic CPR, delay in basic CPR, the interval between basic CPR and EMS arrival, and being both untrained and inexperienced in basic CPR were independent predictors for survival. Basic CPR performed by persons trained a long time ago did not appear to have a negative influence on outcome, nor did basic CPR limited to chest compressions alone. The mere reporting that basic CPR has been performed does not describe adequately the actual value of basic CPR. The interval from collapse to initiation of basic CPR, and the training and experience of the performer must be taken into account. Policy makers for basic CPR training should focus on partners of the patients, who are most likely witness of an arrest.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the cardio vent device in a resuscitation model.

To compare the "Bellows on Sternum Resuscitation" (BSR) device that permits simultaneous compression and ventilation by one rescuer with two person cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation in a single blind crossover study performed in the laboratory setting. Tidal volume and compression depth were recorded continuously during 12-min CPR sessions with the BSR device and two person CPR. Six CPR instructors performed a total of 1,894 ventilations and 10,532 compressions in 3 separate 12-min sessions. Mean tidal volume (MTV) and compression rate (CR) with the BSR device differed significantly from CPR with the BVM group (1242 mL vs. 1065 mL, respectively, p = 0.0018 and 63.2 compressions per minute (cpm) vs. 81.3 cpm, respectively, p = 0.0076). Error in compression depth (ECD) rate of 9.78% was observed with the BSR device compared to 8.49% with BMV CPR (p = 0.1815). Error rate was significantly greater during the second half of CPR sessions for both BSR and BVM groups. It is concluded that one-person CPR with the BSR device is equivalent to two-person CPR with BVM in all measured parameters except for CR. Both groups exhibited greater error rate in CPR performance in the latter half of 12-min CPR sessions.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗

[The determination of end-expiratory CO2 during resuscitation. Experience and results with the Normocap 200 (Fa. Datex) in preclinical resuscitation conditions].

Capnometers measure carbon dioxide (CO2) in inspired and expired air. Under physiological conditions end-tidal CO2 (peCO2) measurements closely reflect arterial pCO2 (paCO2). End-tidal CO2 concentration has been found to correlate with cardiac output in animal models and in clinical studies with cardiac arrest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In the present study in 23 cases of CPR end-tidal CO2 concentrations were registered during precordial compression with a transportable, battery-carried capnometer. In 7 cases of successful CPR mean concentrations of end-tidal CO2 were higher than in unsuccessful CPR (13 +/- 7 mmHg versus 8 +/- 6 mmHg). No statistical significance was found. In case of successful CPR there was a sudden rise in end-tidal CO2 up to 54 +/- 6 mmHg, indicating satisfactory spontaneous circulation. With capnometry it is possible to assess the efficacy of precordial compression during resuscitation and the return of spontaneous circulation in cardiopulmonary arrest.

Carbon Dioxide↗

Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on resuscitation.

Restoration of adequate spontaneous circulation after "arrest" and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of 546 patients before and 460 patients after initiation of a CPR training course in a 500-bed city hospital is reported. Between January 1972 and June 1976, adequate circulation after CPR was present in 38.6% of patients before and 50.4% after training ICU nurses and house physicians in modern resuscitation techniques. Factors crucial to resumption of adequate circulation are: (1) CPR training of all hospital personnel so that effective CPR can be started immediately after recognition of an arrest situation, (2) production of a palpable pulse with closed chest cardiac massage, and (3) prompt effective therapy so that the time interval between arrest and resumption of adequate spontaneous circulation is short.

Blood Circulation↗

Philosophical, ethical, and legal aspects of resuscitation medicine. I. Deferred consent and justification of resuscitation research.

Informed prospective consent for clinical resuscitation research may not be possible. Deferred consent is an untenable notion. Consent to continue in research cannot be used to support a claim that there was, or would have been, consent to the initiation of research. The conditions for the justifiability of resuscitation research without informed consent are: a) patient is comatose; b) lifesaving treatment must be given immediately; c) given all available evidence, there is reason to believe that the probability of death or severe deficit with experimental or control therapy is not greater than the probability of death or severe deficit on usual therapy; d) given all available evidence, there is reason to believe that the probability of normal or near-normal outcome is greater on experimental or control therapy than on usual therapy; and e) the study can provide evidence on whether there is a significant difference between experimental and control therapies in the incidence of normal or near-normal survival.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗