Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RECTAL PROLAPSE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Anal sphincter morphology in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the morphologic change of the anal canal in patients with rectal prolapse. METHODS: The endoanal ultrasound scans of 18 patients with rectal prolapse were compared with those of 23 asymptomatic controls. The thickness and area of the internal anal sphincter and submucosa were measured at three levels. RESULTS: Qualitatively, patients with rectal prolapse showed a characteristic elliptical morphology in the anal canal with anterior/posterior submucosal distortion accounting for most of the change. Quantitatively, internal anal sphincter (IAS) and submucosa (SM) thicknesses and area were greater in all quadrants of the anal canal (especially upper) in patients with rectal prolapse compared with controls. There was statistical evidence (in a regression model) of a relationship between increases in all measured variables and the finding of rectal prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: The cause of sphincter distortion in rectal prolapse is unknown but may be a response to increased mechanical stress placed on the sphincter from the prolapse or an abnormal response by the sphincter complex to the prolapse. Patients found to have this feature on endoanal ultrasound should undergo clinical examination and defecography to look for rectal wall abnormalities.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Ripstein procedure is an effective treatment for rectal prolapse without constipation.

The operation of choice for complete rectal prolapse is controversial. We reviewed 169 patients undergoing 185 surgical procedures for rectal prolapse over a 27-year period. The most common surgical procedure employed was the Ripstein procedure (n = 142) and is the focus of this report. Other surgical procedures used included resection rectopexy (n = 18), anterior resection (n = 7), Altemeier's (n = 9), Delorme's (n = 2), and anal encirclement (n = 7). The median age was 59 years (range, 12-94 years), and the female-to-male ratio was 5:1. The incidence of fecal incontinence, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, and prior surgery elsewhere for rectal prolapse was 40 percent, 12 percent, and 19 percent, respectively. Operative mortality was 0.6 percent; morbidity was 16 percent. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (range, 1-15 years). Complete recurrence of prolapse after the Ripstein procedure was 8 percent; one-third of these patients recurred 3 to 14 years after surgery. Fecal incontinence improved after the Ripstein procedure or resection rectopexy in about half the patients. Persistence of prior constipation was more common after the Ripstein procedure than after resection rectopexy (57 percent vs. 17 percent; P = 0.03, chi-squared). Fifteen patients developed constipation for the first time after the Ripstein procedure. About one in three patients, irrespective of surgical procedures, remained dissatisfied with the final outcome despite anatomic correction of the prolapse. The Ripstein procedure has proven to be a safe procedure with good anatomic repair of the prolapse and may improve continence. In the presence of constipation, procedures other than the Ripstein procedure may be preferable.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Report of 257 cases.

From 1953 to 1982, 257 patients with complete rectal prolapse were operated upon. To the procedure described by Orr, we have added mobilization of the rectum prior to its suspension and eliminated the pouch of Douglas, and nylon strips have been used for suspension in most patients. There were 57 male and 200 female patients. Ages ranged from 11 to 90 years. Sixty-one patients had already undergone surgery for rectal prolapse with another procedure and prolapse had recurred. The postoperative course was uneventful in 96 per cent of patients. Two patients, aged 79 to 83 years, died of cardiac failure. Follow-up of 115 patients ranged from five to 23 years. Recurrent rectal prolapse was observed in 4.3 per cent of the patients in whom nylon strips were used to suspend the rectum. In 136 patients anal incontinence was associated with rectal prolapse. Normal continence was restored in 84.1 per cent of 107 patients with rectopexy alone and in 64.2 per cent of 14 patients who underwent rectopexy and anal sphincter repair. It is concluded that rectopexy to the promontory with nylon strips after mobilization of the rectum is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: A remarkable incidence of failures after stapled axopexy (SA) for hemorrhoids has been recently reported by several papers, with an incomplete resection of the prolapsed tissue, due to the limited volume of the stapler casing as possible cause. The stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) was demonstrated to successfully cure the association of rectal prolapse and rectocele by using two staplers. The aim of this randomized study was to evaluate the incidence of residual disease after SA and STARR in patients affected by prolapsed hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients were selected on the basis of validated constipation and continence scorings, clinical examination, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, and defecography and randomized: 34 underwent a SA and 34 a STARR operation. The operated patients were followed-up with clinical examination, visual analog scale for postoperative pain, a satisfaction index, and defecography. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 8.1+/-2.0 and 7.9+/-1.8 months for the SA and STARR groups, respectively, the incidence of residual disease was significantly higher in the first group (29.4 vs 5.9 in the STARR group, p=0.007), while a significantly lower incidence of residual skin-tags was found after STARR (23.5% vs 58.8 after SA, p=0.03). All patients with residual disease showed prolapsed tissue over half the length of the anal dilator at the time of the operation. Operative time and incidence of transient fecal urgency were significantly higher in the STARR group (with p=0.001 and 0.08, respectively), while SA was followed by a significantly higher incidence of poor results at the overall patient satisfaction index (p=0.04). No significant differences were found in hospital stay, operative complications, postoperative pain, time to return to normal activity, continence, and constipation scores. All the defecographic parameters significantly improved after STARR, while SA was followed only by a trend to a reduction of rectal prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: STARR provides a more complete resection of the prolapsed tissue than SA in patients with association of prolapsed hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse with equal morbidity and significantly lower incidence of residual disease and skin-tags. The anal dilator can be used for selecting the surgical technique.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2005

Incarcerated recurrent rectal prolapse with ileal strangulation: report of a case.

We report a rare case of incarcerated rectal prolapse with ileal strangulation occurring after a Gant-Miwa procedure with anal encircling (Thiersch's procedure) for recurrent rectal prolapse. The patient was a 78-year-old woman who presented to our outpatient clinic the day after sudden rectal protrusion had occurred. She had undergone a Gant-Miwa procedure for rectal prolapse 4 years previously, and another Gant-Miwa procedure with anal encircling for recurrent rectal prolapse 18 months earlier. The patient attempted to reduce the prolapse manually, but was unsuccessful. On admission, a 10 x 4-cm semispherical mass was observed extra-anally, with a necrotic surface. We performed an emergency laparotomy, which rerealed a prolapse of the anterior wall of the rectum with part of the ileum protruding into the sac formation. Thus, we resected the incarcerated ileum followed by primary anastomosis and proctectomy (Hartmann's procedure) with good results. This case demonstrates that ileal strangulation can occur as a complication of rectal prolapse recurrence after perineal repair.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Helicoidal suture: alternative treatment for complete rectal prolapse in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Optimal treatment for rectal prolapse is controversial. We describe a novel alternative treatment for high-risk patients with complete rectal prolapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen high-risk patients over 60 years old with complete rectal prolapse were examined. All patients had significant past medical history and were classified as grade III (ASA) surgical risk. The helicoidal suture technique is described. Postoperative parameters evaluated were morbidity, mortality, postoperative symptoms, recurrence and anal incontinence score. Median follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: There were no operative complications or mortality in the series; one patient experienced recurrence. Median postoperative anal incontinence score was 6.06 (range 1-30; preoperative 23.6). CONCLUSION: This technique provides adequate functional outcomes and could be an effective therapeutic strategy against rectal prolapse in high-risk patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Length of docked tail and the incidence of rectal prolapse in lambs.

A multistate cooperative study was conducted to study the current issue of tail length in docked lambs and its relationship to incidence of rectal prolapse. A total of 1,227 lambs at six locations were randomly allocated to two or three tail dock treatments: 1) short--tail was removed as close to the body as possible, 2) medium--tail was removed at a location midway between the attachment of the tail to the body and the attachment of the caudal folds to the tail, and 3) long--tail was removed at the attachment of the caudal folds to the tail. Short-docked lambs had a greater (P < 0.05) incidence of rectal prolapse (7.8%) than lambs with a medium (4.0%) or a long (1.8%) dock. Female lambs had a higher (P < 0.05) incidence of rectal prolapse than male lambs. At two stations, lambs were finished either in a feedlot on a high-concentrate diet or on pasture with no grain supplementation. At one station, with a very low incidence of rectal prolapse, there was no difference in incidence between lambs finished in the feedlot or on pasture; however, at the station with a relatively high incidence of rectal prolapse, lambs in the feedlot had a higher (P < 0.05) incidence than lambs on pasture. The half-sib estimate of heritability for the incidence of rectal prolapse was low (0.14). The results of this study strongly implicate short dock length as a cause of rectal prolapse in lambs finished on high-concentrate diets. Furthermore, the results of this study and the only other study known conducted on this issue strongly suggest that docking lambs at the site of the attachment of the caudal folds to the tail will result in a negligible incidence of rectal prolapse.

Animal Husbandry↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Use of modified irrigoradioscopy in the diagnosis of external and internal rectal prolapse].

The paper gives colonic X-ray findings in 39 patients with rectal prolapse. Of them, 20 and 19 patients were found to have internal and external rectal prolapse, respectively. Studies were conducted by the modified irrigoscopy developed by the State Coloproctology Research Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, to explore the anatomic and functional status of the rectum and the fundus of the pelvis in patients with impaired defecation. The X-ray sign of circular invagination that had been detected by the authors allowed them to make the diagnosis of internal rectal prolapse with the greatest assurance. The modified irrigoscopy in combination with oral enterography for external rectal prolapse could show associated changes, including enterocele and sigmocele.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

Rectal prolapse in the horse.

Eleven horses with rectal prolapses were examined at Purdue University. Nine of the 11 prolapses were corrected by submucosal resection. Four of those were treated by a modified submucosal resection that apposes mucosa as well as submucosa. Follow-up of 8 cases, at intervals ranging from 4 months to 6 years, established that rectal prolapse did not recur following the resection.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse.

There is evidence that the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is associated with rectal prolapse either overt or internal. The anterior rectal wall is affected in most cases and a modified abdominal rectopexy has been used with the aim of supporting both the anterior and posterior aspects of the rectum. Fourteen patients aged 19-70 years (mean 34.2 years) in whom conservative treatment has failed, have been treated by anteroposterior rectopexy. Tenesmus, bleeding and the passage of mucus have been abolished or greatly improved in 12, 14 and 13 patients respectively. The number of attempts to defaecate per 24 h has fallen from 8.7 +/- 1.4(s.e.m.) pre-operatively to 3.4 +/- 1.0(s.e.m.) postoperatively (P less than 0.05) and the time spent in the lavatory has been reduced from 146 +/- 18(s.e.m.) min to 15 +/- 3(s.e.m.) min. Two patients have developed severe constipation postoperatively and two others have had persistent or recurrent tenesmus. Combined anteroposterior rectopexy has improved 12 out of 14 patients with the solitary ulcer syndrome without external rectal prolapse when assessed at 2-48 months postoperatively.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Injection sclerotherapy in the treatment of rectal prolapse in infants and children.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of injection sclerotherapy as treatment for persistent rectal prolapse. METHODS: The records of 28 patients with rectal prolapse treated with injection sclerotherapy over a 16-year period were reviewed. Initial management included assessment and correction of predisposing factors. If rectal prolapse persisted or if the prolapse required repeat emergency or operating room reduction, injection sclerotherapy was performed. The sclerosing agent included D50W in 21 patients (sole agent in 15, combined with ethanolamine oleate in four, and with phenol 5% in two). Phenol 5% alone was used in six patients, and 25% saline was used in one patient. Number of injections, recurrences, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Two patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient was cured once a polyp was recognized and removed. Of the remaining 25 patients, 21 were cured. Sixteen required one injection, three required two injections, and two required three injections (64% cure rate after one injection, 84% cure rate after three injections). There were 4 of 25 failures: two went on to low anterior resection after having failed two injections each; one patient was treated with Thiersch cerclage and injection after two failed injections; and one patient did not respond after three injections but had less severe prolapses. Of those injected with D50W alone, 13 of 14 were cured with injection sclerotherapy. Nine received one injection, two received two injections, and two received three injections (64% cure rate after one injection, 93% cure rate after three injections). The only complication was excessive oozing at the injection site in one patient. He was simply observed in hospital overnight. Follow-up averaged 33 months. The only significant underlying abnormality in our patient population was spina bifida in one patient. This patient was cured with injection therapy. Cystic fibrosis was ruled out by clinical examination and sweat chloride test in all patients. Constipation was the most common condition identified with the onset of rectal prolapse (15 of 28). CONCLUSIONS: Injection sclerotherapy is simple and should be considered as the first line treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse after failure of conservative measures. D50W is effective, easily available, inexpensive, and associated with few complications.

Causality↗
PubMed1996

Association of rectal prolapse with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although screening for colorectal cancer facilitates earlier detection and improves survival, cost-effective screening requires identification of patients at high risk for colorectal cancer. Rectal prolapse has not been clearly linked to colorectal carcinoma. Whether patients with rectal prolapse should be screened for colorectal cancer is therefore unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 70 consecutive patients treated for rectal prolapse at a community hospital during a period of 16 years and monitored for an average of 4.4 +/- 2.7 years and 350 patients of similar age treated for chronic unrelated conditions in the same institution during a similar period. We determined their incidence of colorectal cancer and sought demographic correlates. RESULTS: The prevalence of rectosigmoid carcinoma among patients with prolapse was 5.7% during the study. Only 1.4% of the comparative group had colorectal cancer. Thus patients with rectal prolapse exhibited a 4.2-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 16.0) relative risk for colorectal cancer over the comparative group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: To the extent to which these patients represent the population of patients with rectal prolapse, routine initial screening of patients with symptomatic rectal prolapse by use of flexible sigmoidoscopy may be appropriate.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Perineal repair of rectal prolapse.

Perineal approaches to the repair of rectal prolapse are frequently used in elderly or high-risk patients. These repairs have lower operative mortality and morbidity than intra-abdominal repairs but in general have higher recurrence rates. This study reviews our recent results with perineal prolapse repairs, briefly summarizes the literature, and discusses the available perineal operations. Eight patients (mean age 75 years) underwent surgical prolapse repair over an 18-month period. Treatment was by Altemeier's procedure (perineal rectosigmoidectomy) in 6 patients and Delorme's procedure in 2 patients. There were no operative mortalities, and an anastomotic dehiscence in 1 patient was managed nonoperatively. All patients with preoperative constipation improved and no patient reported worsening of continence. Surgical approaches from the perineum may be used in elderly and poor risk patients to treat rectal prolapse with low mortality and morbidity. These techniques have not adversely affected fecal continence and have improved symptoms of constipation with an acceptable rate of recurrence.

Aged↗
PubMed1980

Rectal prolapse.

Teflon sling repair of rectal prolapse appeals to us because it is relatively safe in patients who are often in an older age and at high risk. The Thiersch operation has been employed in a small number of patients with limited life expectancy. In our experience, major complications of the operation described by Ripstein have been late stricturing or late recurrent prolapse, and these have been dealt with satisfactorily by either anterior resection or replacement of the sling.

Humans↗
PubMed1984

Abnormalities of colonic function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.

We have investigated changes in colonic motility and anorectal function in 6 continent patients with a rectal prolapse; in 10 incontinent patients with rectal prolapse and in 16 patients with idiopathic faecal incontinence compared with 26 age and sex match controls. A history of incontinence, irrespective of a prolapse, was associated with significantly lower anal squeeze pressures (P less than 0.05), a deficient anorectal angle (P less than 0.05), failure to retain a balloon containing more than 250 cm3 of air in the rectum (P less than 0.01) and increased sigmoid motility (P less than 0.02) compared with controls. By contrast patients with rectal prolapse and no incontinence had normal anal pressures, a normal anorectal angle and normal sigmoid motility, but transit was delayed. These results indicate that abnormal sigmoid motility is commonly associated with faecal incontinence and that slow transit constipation is frequent in patients with rectal prolapse who are continent.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Early outcomes of laparoscopic procedures performed on military personnel with total rectal prolapse and follow-up.

Total rectal prolapse is a disorder frequently associated with constipation and anal incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the complications, pain management, hospital stay, constipation, and anal functions of the patients undergoing 2 types of laparoscopic surgical approaches. In this study, 33 patients underwent either laparoscopic rectopexy or hand-assisted laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Preoperative colonic transit time, defecation, postoperative pain scoring, pre-postoperative evaluation of the anal function, and the changes in constipation and relating symptoms were assessed. Postoperative evaluation had been performed at the sixth week and the twelfth month. Median operation time was 137 minutes for rectopexy and 230 minutes for resection rectopexy group. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days for patients with rectopexy and 7 days for patients with resection rectopexy. Patients needed painkillers in short postoperative period for pain management in both groups. Continence was improved in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) in a year after laparoscopic surgery. In 15 patients (45.5%), preoperative constipation either remained in the same or became worse in 7 (21.1%) in a year after surgery. No patient developed recurrence in the median follow-up period, which was about 15 months. Laparoscopic rectopexy and resection rectopexy in the young aged patients working the Army are carried out with less morbidity rate. We eliminated the total prolapse and cure incontinence in almost all patients. In addition to constipation was reduced by laparoscopic surgical approaches in a short time hospitalization with short time painkiller need.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Two treatment policies for rectal prolapse were prospectively assessed between April 1986 and January 1989. Sixteen patients had a Marlex mesh posterior rectopexy alone and 13 underwent a sigmoidectomy combined with a sutured posterior rectopexy. Preoperative and post-operative assessment included manometry, a saline infusion test and video-proctography. Hospital stay, control of prolapse and complications were comparable in both groups. Restoration of continence occurred in nine of the 12 incontinent patients after Marlex rectopexy, compared with six of nine after sutured rectopexy and sigmoidectomy. Constipation persisted in three patients who were constipated before operation and in four of 13 who had previously normal bowel habits became constipated after Marlex rectopexy; constipation persisted in one of five previously constipated patients while none with previously normal bowel habits became constipated after sutured rectopexy and sigmoidectomy. Sigmoidectomy combined with sutured rectopexy was safe and as efficient as Marlex rectopexy in prolapse control and improvement of continence; significantly fewer patients were constipated (one of 13) after sigmoidectomy than following rectopexy alone (seven of 16). A randomized trial now seems justified.

Adolescent↗