Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Purchasing, Hospital”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Ontario hospitals' purchasing practices for hip and knee prostheses: a survey.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the makes, models and prices of the implants provided by Ontario hospitals for hip and knee replacements and the policies and procedures governing purchases. DESIGN: A questionnaire survey of hospitals with telephone follow-up. STUDY POPULATION: Seventy-nine public hospitals in Ontario in which 10 or more hip or knee replacements were carried out in the fiscal year 1993/94. SURVEY RESPONSE: Seventy-six hospitals returned questionnaires (96% response rate), reporting on 4950 primary hip and 5107 primary knee implants. Sixty-two hospitals reported volumes and prices for 19 models used in 2961 hip implants. Information on price but not makes and models was available for 1989 hip implants. Model and price information was missing for 340 hip prostheses. Fifty-seven hospitals identified the models and prices for 3460 knee implants. Twenty-five hospitals provided prices but not specific models names for 1647 knee implants and hybrids. OUTCOME MEASURE: The prices paid for prostheses. RESULTS: The average price of hip implants was Can$2141 (range from Can$650 to Can$3559). The average price for knee implants was Can$2412 (range from Can$1178 to Can$3777). The averages and ranges were about the same for specified and unspecified models and hybrids. The variations were unrelated to hospital policies about the numbers of procedures to be provided or the procedures for making purchases from suppliers. CONCLUSIONS: Savings of Can$13.7 million could have been made in Ontario during the fiscal year 1993/94 had the lowest prices been paid for the implants. Although it may be neither desirable nor possible to use the least expensive model and price in every hospital, the potential for cost reductions in the purchase of implants is substantial.

Cost Savings↗
PubMed1995

How useful are non-random comparisons of outcomes and quality of care in purchasing hospital stroke services?

We performed a prospective observational study using a stroke register, case-note review and survey of carers with 6 months of follow-up in two adjacent health districts in East London. District 1 was a teaching district and had no special stroke service; District 2 had a comprehensive stroke service comprising stroke unit, review of all stroke admissions and community follow-up. Three hundred and sixty-one consecutive patients with stroke admitted to hospital and 103 carers were surveyed at 6 months from admission using the Royal College of Physicians (London) Stroke Audit standards. We also assessed mortality, disability, perceived health, mood, and satisfaction with services 6 months after stroke, carer mood, perceived health and satisfaction with services. The standard of care was below that set by the Royal College of Physicians of London in both districts and there were no significant differences between the districts in age-standardized mortality at 1 and 6 months, Barthel score, extended ADL score, Geriatric Depression score, Nottingham Health Profile score and patient satisfaction with services at 6 months. Carer outcomes did not differ between districts. Service costs, particularly costs of rehabilitation services, were much lower in District 2. A comprehensive district stroke service was not associated with major differences in patient outcomes or standards of care. This may have been because the non-random nature of the comparison meant that the patients differed in other ways than in the nature of treatment. Caution is needed when using these techniques in making purchasing decisions.

Activities of Daily Living↗