Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1989

Bacteriophage T4 early promoter regions. Consensus sequences of promoters and ribosome-binding sites.

Twenty-nine early promoters from bacteriophage T4 and 14 early promoters from bacteriophage T6 were isolated using vector M13HDL17, a promoterless derivative of M13mp8 carrying a linker sequence, the bacteriophage lambda-terminator tR1, and the lacZ' gene including part of its ribosome-binding site. The consensus sequence for the T4 promoters is: (sequence; see text). Ribosome-binding sites of T4 share the sequence: 5'...g.GGAga..aA.ATGAa.a...3' The consensus sequence of the T4 early promoter regions is significantly different in sequence and length from that of Escherichia coli promoters. Only one of the promoters detected with vector M13HDL17 resembled a typical bacterial promoter. The high information content raises the possibility that additional proteins recognize and contact nucleotides within the promoter region. All T4 early promoters also carry DNA sequences that could support DNA curving, a structural feature that might contribute to promoter recognition.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Transcriptional interference between convergent promoters caused by elongation over the promoter.

Transcriptional interference with convergent transcription from face-to-face promoters is a potentially important form of gene regulation in all organisms. Using LacZ reporter studies, the mechanism of interference was determined for a pair of face-to-face prokaryotic promoters in which a strong promoter interferes 5.6-fold with a weak promoter, 62 bp away. The promoters were variously rearranged to test different models of interference. Terminating transcription from the strong promoter before it reached the weak promoter dramatically reduced interference, indicating a requirement for the passage of the converging RNAP over the weak promoter. Based on in vitro experiments showing a slow rate of escape for open complexes at the weak promoter and their sensitivity to head-on collisions with elongating RNAP, a "sitting duck" model of interference is proposed and supported with in vivo permanganate footprinting. The model is further supported by the analysis of a second set of prokaryotic face-to-face promoters.

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Individual V(H) promoters vary in strength, but the frequency of rearrangement of those V(H) genes does not correlate with promoter strength nor enhancer-independence.

The process of V(D)J recombination is highly regulated. Germline transcription of unrearranged gene segments precedes V(D)J rearrangement, and the correlation between germline transcription and accessibility for recombination is strong; thus it has been suggested that germline transcription may be required for rearrangement. If germline transcription is essential for rearrangement, then the level of transcription of individual gene segments might affect the relative frequency of recombination of those genes. Also, since the intronic enhancer, E(mu), is very distant from V(H) genes before they rearrange, then any promoters which were enhancer dependent might have a transcriptional advantage. Here we study in luciferase vectors the promoters of three functional genes of the V(H)S107 family, and compare them to that of the most frequently rearranging gene in the mouse I(g)H locus, V(H)81X, and to a V(H)J558 gene. Within the V(H)S107 family, the three V(H) genes rearrange with very different relative frequencies, with V1 rearranging the most, and V13 seldom rearranging. We show that only the strong V(H)J558 promoter has significant luciferase reporter gene activity in the absence of E(mu). V1 has only 20% as much activity as J558 in the absence of E(mu), and the other promoters have less than 8% of the activity of J558. Notably, the 81X promoter has essentially no enhancer-independent activity. In the presence of E(mu), V1 has equivalent activity to J558, while the other promoters show much less activity. Again, 81X is the weakest promoter of all, despite being the most frequently rearranging gene. Finally, we show that the steady state level of V(H)S107 and V(H)7183 germline transcripts in vivo is very low. Thus, these data show little correlation between the strength or enhancer-independence of these V(H) promoters and the relative frequency of recombination of the corresponding V(H) genes. In addition, the data show that individual V(H) promoters have different strengths even in the presence of E(mu), demonstrating that even promoters within a single V(H) family can be quite heterogeneous.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Identification of an upstream enhancer within a functional promoter of the human leukemia inhibitory factor receptor gene and its alternative promoter usage.

Knockout of the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR) gene results in disrupted placental architecture, imbalanced bone development, and losses of functional neurons. We here report the identification of an enhancer in a functional human LIFR gene promoter and alternative promoter usage by this gene. A single transcription start site was identified in placental JEG-3 cells and a genomic clone containing 4876-nucleotide upstream sequences was found to have promoter activity in JEG-3 cells. However, in osteogenic sarcoma U-2 OS cell, Northern blot using a probe of the first exon detected in JEG-3 cells failed to detect LIFR transcripts. 5'-Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) revealed an alternative first exon and a 0.6-kilobase pair (kb) 5'-flanking region possessed promoter activity in U-2 OS cells. For the 4.8-kb promoter active in placental cells, a minimal promoter was localized within -162 nucleotides. Three regions increased and one inhibited promoter activity. Subcloning of an activation region (-4876 to -3453 nucleotides) into SV40 promoter either upstream or downstream in either orientation to the luciferase reporter resulted in 10-35-fold luciferase induction, demonstrating the characteristics of an enhancer. Transfections into nine cell lines of different tissue origin indicated that the cloned promoter and enhancer in the 4.8-kb fragment was placental tissue-specific. A 226-base pair fragment (-4625 to -4400 nucleotides) was further localized as the minimal enhancer region, in which deletion of either element A (-4625 to -4581 nucleotides) or element B (-4418 to -4400 nucleotides) resulted in the loss of enhancer activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay confirmed that these two elements bind to specific nuclear proteins individually. In the middle region between element A and B, disruption of enhancer integrity also led to a loss of enhancer activity, although two SP1 and three NF-kappaB/c-Rel binding sites did not contribute to enhancer function. These results demonstrate a complex regulation of the human LIFR gene, including alternative promoter usage and tissue-specific elements at the transcription level.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Cloning and characterization of the human heparanase-1 (HPR1) gene promoter: role of GA-binding protein and Sp1 in regulating HPR1 basal promoter activity.

Heparanase-1 (HPR1) is an endoglycosidase that specifically degrades the heparan sulfate chains of proteoglycan, a component of blood vessel walls and the extracellular matrix. Recent studies demonstrated that HPR1 expression is increased in a variety of malignancies and may play a critical role in tumor metastases. The HPR1 gene and its genomic structure have been recently cloned and characterized. To understand the mechanisms of HPR1 gene expression and regulation, we first mapped the transcription start site of the HPR1 gene and found that HPR1 mRNA was transcribed from the nucleotide position 101 bp upstream of the ATG codon. A 3.5-kb promoter region of the HPR1 gene was cloned. Sequence analysis revealed that the TATA-less, GC-rich promoter of the HPR1 gene belongs to the family of housekeeping genes. This 3.5-kb promoter region exhibited strong promoter activity in two thyroid tumor cell lines. Truncation analysis of the HPR1 promoter identified a minimal 0.3-kb region that had strong basal promoter activity. Truncation and mutational analysis of the HPR1 promoter revealed three Sp1 sites and four Ets-relevant elements (ERE) significantly contributing to basal HPR1 promoter activity. Binding to the Sp1 sites by Sp1 and to the ERE sites by GA-binding protein (GABP) was confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and competition and supershift electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Cotransfection of Sp- and GABP-deficient Drosophila SL-2 cells with the HPR1 promoter-driven luciferase construct plus the expression vector encoding the Sp1, Sp3, or GABP gene induced luciferase gene expression. Mutation or truncation of the Sp1 or ERE sites reduced luciferase expression in both SL-2 cells and thyroid tumor cell lines. Coexpression of GABPalpha/beta and Sp1 or Sp3 further increased luciferase reporter gene expression. Our results collectively suggest that Sp1 cooperates with GABP to regulate HPR1 promoter activity.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

The role of specific enhancer-promoter interactions in the Drosophila Adh promoter switch.

The Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene is transcribed from two promoters active at different developmental stages. In this paper we show that the promoters are differentially stimulated by two enhancers, the Adh larval enhancer and the Adh adult enhancer. In early larval stages, the larval enhancer stimulates transcription from the proximal promoter; in late larval stages, the two enhancers act synergistically to stimulate transcription from the distal promoter; and in adults, the adult enhancer stimulates transcription from the distal promoter. To determine the basis for these enhancer-promoter interactions, we examined the effect of each enhancer on three different promoters. We found that the adult enhancer is stage specific and stimulates transcription from all three promoters. In contrast, the larval enhancer is potentially active in all stages and stimulates transcription from only two of the three promoters. These observations suggest that normal temporal expression of Adh depends on the stage-specific activity of the adult enhancer and the differential response of the proximal and distal promoters to the larval enhancer.

Alcohol Dehydrogenase↗
PubMed1990

Pollen- and anther-specific chi promoters from petunia: tandem promoter regulation of the chiA gene.

We have analyzed the spatial and temporal activities of chalcone flavanone isomerase (chi) A and B gene promoters from petunia. To study the tandem promoter regulation of chiA, various chiA promoter fragments were fused with the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene. Analysis of transgenic plants containing these chimeric genes provided definitive proof that the chiA coding region is regulated by two distinct promoters (designated PA1 and PA2). We also showed that both promoters can function independently and that the chiA PA1 promoter is expressed in limb (epidermal and parenchyma cells), tube (inner epidermal and parenchyma cells), seed (seed coat, endosperm, and embryo), sepal, leaf, and stem. The use of chiA and chiB promoters in the regulation of anther- and pollen-specific gene expression has been studied. By analyzing transgenic plants containing chimeric genes consisting of chiA and B promoter fragments and the GUS reporter gene, we were able to identify a 0.44-kilobase chiA PA2 promoter fragment that drives pollen-specific gene expression and a 1.75-kilobase chiB PB promoter fragment that confers anther-specific (pollen and tapetum cells) expression to the GUS gene.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2006

The promoter region of the MDR1 gene is largely invariant, but different single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes affect MDR1 promoter activity differently in different cell lines.

The MDR1 multidrug transporter represents one of the better characterized drug transporters that play an important role in protecting the body against xenobiotic insults. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNP haplotypes within this gene have been variously associated with differences in MDR1 expression/function, drug response as well as disease susceptibility. Nonetheless, the effect of polymorphisms at the MDR1 promoter region on its promoter activity remains less characterized. Through the examination of approximately 1.5 kilobases of MDR1 promoter region from five populations, including the Chinese, Malays, Indians, European Americans, and African Americans, we identified eight low-frequency SNPs, of which only two were polymorphic in at least four of the five populations examined. The other SNPs are mainly population-specific, the majority of which occur only in the African-American population. Recapitulation of the various combinations of SNP haplotypes in vitro in promoter-reporter assays revealed a few notable trends. The African and European American-specific haplotypes tended to result in enhanced MDR1 promoter activity only in the human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cell line. Haplotype GCTAACC, which occurs at variable frequencies in all the populations examined, with Asians having much lower frequencies (<2%) compared with the European Americans/African Americans (>4%), affected MDR1 promoter activity differently in different cell lines. Compared with the commonest haplotype, GCTA-ACC haplotype resulted in a significant decrease in MDR1 promoter activity in HeLa cells (P < 0.05) but a significant increase in the same promoter activity in HEK293 cells (P < 0.05). These results suggest that the MDR1 promoter region is largely invariant but that different haplotypes have differential effects on the MDR1 promoter activity in different cell lines.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1989

Saturation mutagenesis of an Escherichia coli rRNA promoter and initial characterization of promoter variants.

Using oligonucleotide synthesis techniques, we generated Escherichia coli rrnB P1 (rrnB1p according to the nomenclature of B. J. Bachmann and K. B. Low [Microbiol. Rev. 44:1-56, 1980]) promoter fragments containing single base substitutions, insertions, deletions, and multiple mutations, covering the whole length of the promoter including the upstream activation sequence (UAS). The activities of 112 mutant promoters were assayed as operon fusions to lacZ in lambda lysogens. The activities of most mutants with changes in the core promoter recognition region (i.e., substitutions, insertions, or deletions in the region of the promoter spanning the -10 and -35 E. coli consensus hexamers) correlated with changes toward or away from the consensus in the hexamer sequences or in the spacing between them. However, changes at some positions in the core promoter region not normally associated with transcriptional activity in other systems also had significant effects on rrnB P1. Since rRNA promoter activity varies with cellular growth rate, changes in activity can be the result of changes in promoter strength or of alterations in the regulation of the promoter. The accompanying paper (R. R. Dickson, T. Gaal, H. A. deBoer, P. L. deHaseth, and R. L. Gourse, J. Bacteriol. 171:4862-4870, 1989) distinguishes between these two alternatives. Several mutations in the UAS resulted in two- to fivefold reductions in activity. However, two mutants with changes just upstream of the -35 hexamer in constructs containing the UAS had activities 20- to 100-fold lower than the wild-type level. This collection of mutant rRNA promoters should serve as an important resource in the characterization of the mechanisms responsible for upstream activation and growth rate-dependent regulation of rRNA transcription.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed2005

Promoter classifier: software package for promoter database analysis.

Promoter Classifier is a package of seven stand-alone Windows-based C++ programs allowing the following basic manipulations with a set of promoter sequences: (i) calculation of positional distributions of nucleotides averaged over all promoters of the dataset; (ii) calculation of the averaged occurrence frequencies of the transcription factor binding sites and their combinations; (iii) division of the dataset into subsets of sequences containing or lacking certain promoter elements or combinations; (iv) extraction of the promoter subsets containing or lacking CpG islands around the transcription start site; and (v) calculation of spatial distributions of the promoter DNA stacking energy and bending stiffness. All programs have a user-friendly interface and provide the results in a convenient graphical form. The Promoter Classifier package is an effective tool for various basic manipulations with eukaryotic promoter sequences that usually are necessary for analysis of large promoter datasets. The program Promoter Divider is described in more detail as a representative component of the package.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1999

Upstream region of rat serum albumin gene promoter contributes to promoter activity: presence of functional binding site for hepatocyte nuclear factor-3.

Transcription of the serum albumin gene occurs almost exclusively in the liver and is controlled in part by a strong liver-specific promoter. The upstream region of the serum albumin gene promoter is highly conserved among species and is footprinted in vitro by a number of nuclear proteins. However, the role of the upstream promoter region in regulating transcription and the identity of the transcription factors that bind to this region have not been established. In the present study, deletion analysis of the rat serum albumin promoter in transiently transfected HepG2 cells demonstrated that elimination of the region between -207 and -153 bp caused a two-fold decrease in promoter activity (P<0.05). Additional analysis of the -207 to -124 bp promoter interval led to the identification of two potential binding sites for hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 (HNF-3) located at -168 to -157 bp (site X) and -145 to -134 bp (site Y). Electrophoretic mobility-shift assays performed with the HNF-3 X and Y sites demonstrated that both sites are capable of binding HNF-3alpha and HNF-3beta. Placement of a single copy of the HNF-3 X site upstream from a minimal promoter increased promoter activity by about four-fold in HepG2 cells, and the reporter construct containing this site could be transactivated if co-transfected with an HNF-3 expression construct. Furthermore, inactivation of the HNF-3 X site by site-directed mutagenesis within the context of the -261 bp albumin promoter construct resulted in a 40% decrease in transcription (P<0.05). These results indicate that the positive effect of the -207 to -153 bp promoter interval is attributable to the presence of the HNF-3 X site within this interval. Additional results obtained with transfected HepG2 cells suggest that the HNF-3 Y site plays a lesser role in activation of transcription than the X site.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1990

Identification of Neurospora mitochondrial promoters and analysis of synthesis of the mitochondrial small rRNA in wild-type and the promoter mutant [poky].

Using an in vitro transcription assay, we previously identified promoters in Neurospora mtDNA at the 5' ends of the genes encoding the mitochondrial (mt) small and large rRNAs and cob pre-mRNA. Here, we identified two additional promoters in mtDNA restriction fragment EcoRI-6, 3.8 and 5.5 kilobases upstream of the 5' end of the mt small rRNA. By comparing the two new promoters with the three identified previously, we derived a modified promoter consensus sequence (AT-rich)15-27TTAG(A/T)RR(G/T)(G/C)N(A/T). The mt small rRNA in Neurospora is transcribed from at least two promoters, a major promoter at the 5' end of the small rRNA and one or both of the newly identified promoters in EcoRI-6. The latter gives a series of putative pre-rRNAs that contain 5' end extensions of various sizes. The 5' ends of a number of these RNAs map at or near hairpin structures. The [poky] mutant, which is grossly deficient in the mt small rRNA, has a 4-base pair deletion in the major promoter at the 5' end of the mt small rRNA. The residual small rRNAs in [poky] appear to be synthesized via the upstream promoter(s), but are missing 37-44 nucleotides from their 5' ends, indicating either that pre-rRNAs are processed abnormally or that abnormal 5' RNA ends are unstable. The effect of the promoter mutation in [poky] on other transcripts suggests that the mt small rRNA is cotranscribed with downstream genes encoding tRNAs, coIII and ND6. Seven nonallelic nuclear suppressors of [poky] result in increased concentrations of the mt small rRNA and pre-rRNAs, but do not restore the ability to synthesize small rRNAs having the correct 5' ends. The suppressor mutations could act by increasing transcription, processing, or stability of the mt small rRNA or its precursors. The suppressors provide a genetic approach for identifying components that affect transcription and processing of the mt small rRNA.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1990

The promoter of the human gene for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Basal promoter activity in HEP G2 cells depends upon liver factor B1.

Characterization of the human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) promoter was initiated to facilitate study of developmental and hormonal factors regulating IGFBP-1 production. The region immediately 5' to the IGFBP-1 mRNA capsite is typical of a eukaryotic promoter, with a TATA sequence beginning 28 base pairs (bp) and a CCAAT promoter element beginning 72 bp upstream from this capsite. A 1.3-kilobase insert containing the IGFBP-1 capsite and 1205 bp of this putative IGFBP-1 promoter region directs expression of the reporter gene chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) in an orientation-specific manner in transfected HEP G2 cells, and the capsite identified for the CAT mRNA is identical to that identified for native IGFBP-1 mRNA. These observations suggest that the 1.3-kilobase insert contains the IGFBP-1 promoter. This promoter was further characterized by deletion analysis, site-directed mutagenesis, gel mobility shift assays, and DNaseI protection assays. These studies identify the CCAAT box region as the major cis element involved in basal IGFBP-1 promoter activity in HEP G2 cells, demonstrate that increased basal promoter activity is associated with the binding of at least one HEP G2 nuclear factor to the CCAAT box region, and indicate that the DNA binding factor(s) responsible for increased basal promoter activity is related to liver factor B1. These observations suggest that liver B1 is the major trans-acting factor stimulating basal IGFBP-1 promoter activity in HEP G2 cells.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Absence of a paused transcription complex from the c-myc P2 promoter of the translocation chromosome in Burkitt's lymphoma cells: implication for the c-myc P1/P2 promoter shift.

We have shown recently that pausing of RNA polymerase II (pol II) at the transcription start site regulates expression from the P2 promoter of the proto-oncogene c-myc. RNAs initiated at the P2 promoter usually contribute > 80% to steady-state c-myc RNA levels in normal cells. In Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) cells c-myc is chromosomally translocated to an immunoglobulin (Ig) gene and preferentially transcribed from the upstream P1 promoter. We have studied the activity of c-myc promoters in two BL cell lines with high expression of P1 RNA. Kinetic nuclear run-on experiments show that the initiation rate at the c-myc P1 promoter in BL2 and BL60 cells is not increased compared with control BJAB cells, whereas the number of paused polymerases at the P2 promoter is greatly diminished. The translocation c-myc gene of BL60 cells was cloned and stably transfected into the BL cell line Raji. The transfected c-myc gene regained the ability to form a paused transcription complex at the c-myc P2 promoter. The data suggest that a paused polymerase at the c-myc P2 promoter impedes transcription from the upstream P1 promoter on a normal c-myc gene. The c-myc gene on the translocation chromosome in BL cells has lost the ability to retain pol II at the P2 promoter, probably by interaction with elements of the adjacent Ig gene locus.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1987

Functional regions of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S RNA promoter determined by use of the firefly luciferase gene as a reporter of promoter activity.

The cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S RNA promoter has been dissected and examined in a transient expression system using the firefly luciferase gene as a reporter of promoter activity. Deletion analysis has shown that the 35S RNA promoter is composed of at least three regions-distal, medial, and proximal-which are essential for activity. The distal region contains three smaller elements homologous to the simian virus 40 "core" enhancer element, the medial region possesses a CCAAT-like box, and the proximal region contains a TATA box. A DNA segment encompassing the distal region is capable of activating the CaMV 35S core promoter in an orientation-independent, but not position-independent, fashion. The distal region can also activate a heterologous weak promoter, the CaMV 19S RNA promoter, albeit not to the high levels of the 35S RNA promoter. Multimers of the distal region are able to activate the 35S RNA promoter core to even greater levels of expression than the native 35S promoter. These experiments demonstrate that elements outside the boundaries of the core promoter (composed of proximal and medial elements) are recognized in a plant cell transient expression system.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1988

Promoter strength comparisons of maize shrunken 1 and alcohol dehydrogenase 1 and 2 promoters in mono- and dicotyledonous species.

Promoter strengths of two maize alcohol dehydrogenase genes, Adh1 and Adh2, and the maize shrunken-1 gene, Sh1, were evaluated by transient expression in cultured protoplasts of Panicum maximum, Triticum monococcum, and Daucus carota. Promoter elements were ligated in correct and opposite orientations as transcriptional gene fusions to the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase gene containing the nopaline synthase 3' polyadenylation signal. The relative levels of gene expression were compared to the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. The full length Adh1 promoter (-1100 to +15) functioned in all species, but at a reduced level in D. carota. An Adh1 promoter deletion from -304 to -1100 did not express at detectable levels in any species nor did the Sh1 promoter construction. The Adh2 promoter (-860 to +90) only expressed in D. carota. The full length Adh1 promoter gave the highest level of CAT expression in the monocot cells but at levels which were approximately 30% compared to the CaMV 35S promoter. This was reduced further in D. carota to approximately 4%. These data suggest that at least some of the regulatory factors responsible for promoter function are somewhat species specific and that these differences should be considered in gene expression studies.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1986

In vitro transcription and promoter strength analysis of five mitochondrial tRNA promoters in yeast.

The in vitro transcriptional initiation sites of four yeast mitochondrial tRNA genes have been investigated in a run-off transcription assay. Precise initiation originating within the 9-nucleotide mitochondrial promoter sequence was detected for the phenylalanine, initiator formyl methionine, cysteine, and one of the two threonine tRNA genes. The relative promoter strength of each of these tRNA promoters as well as that for the previously described glutamate tRNA promoter was determined in a competition assay. This assay measured the utilization of a particular tRNA promoter relative to the amount of transcription arising from a control 14 S rRNA promoter present in the same reaction. The competition strength of the tRNAPhe, tRNAMetf, and tRNAGlu promoters is 20-fold greater than that for the tRNAThrACN and tRNACys promoters. Comparison of the nucleotide sequences at the +2 and +3 positions in the transcripts reveals a homology among the strong promoters not duplicated in the weak promoters.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2000

Development and characterization of an oxygen-dependent inducible promoter system, the modified nar promoter in a mutant Escherichia coli.

A nar promoter system (a modified nar promoter in a mutant host Escherichia coli (pMW618/W3110narL(-))), which is maximally induced under microaerobic conditions, was developed and characterized through batch and fed-batch culture to see whether the modified nar promoter can be used as an oxygen-dependent inducible promoter in the absence of nitrate ion. The modified nar promoter (pMW618) derived by mutations at -10 and -35 regions of the wild-type nar promoter does not require nitrate ion for the full induction, while a mutant host E. coli, W3110narL(-), does not express nitrate-dependent regulatory protein, NARL, from the host chromosome. In this study, it was found from fed-batch culture that the specific beta-galactosidase activity expressed from the lacZ gene fused to the modified nar promoter in the absence of nitrate ion was maximal when E. coli was grown under aerobic conditions (dissolved oxygen (DO) at 80%) to absorbance at 600 nm (OD(600)) of 35, and then the modified nar promoter was induced by lowering DO to 1-2% with alternating microaerobic and aerobic conditions. The maximal specific beta-galactosidase activity became 58,000 Miller at OD(600) of 160 with an induction ratio of 20. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the modified nar promoter system (pMW618/W3110narL(-)), requiring only reduction of DO for the full induction, provides a convenient and effective high-level expression system under conditions of fed-batch culture.

Bacteriological Techniques↗