Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “POU Domain Factors”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Transcription factor regulation of epidermal keratinocyte gene expression.

The epidermis is a tissue that undergoes a very complex and tightly controlled differentiation program. The elaboration of this program is generally flawless, resulting in the production of an effective protective barrier for the organism. Many of the genes expressed during keratinocyte differentiation are expressed in a coordinate manner; this suggests that common regulatory models may emerge. The simplest model envisions a 'common regulatory element' that is possessed by all genes that are regulated together (e.g., involucrin and transglutaminase type 1). Studies to date, however, have not identified any such elements and, if anything, the available studies suggest that appropriate expression of each gene is achieved using sometime subtly and sometime grossly different mechanisms. Recent studies indicate that a variety of transcription factors (AP1, AP2, POU domain. Sp1, STAT factors) are expressed in the epidermis and, in many cases, multiple members of several families are present (e.g., AP1 and POU domain factors). The simultaneous expression of multiple members of a single transcription factor family provides numerous opportunities for complex regulation. Some studies suggest that specific members of these families interact with specific keratinocyte genes. The best studied of these families in epidermis is the AP1 family of factors. All of the known AP1 factors are expressed in epidermis [52] and each is expressed in a specific spatial pattern that suggests the potential to regulate multiple genes. It will be important to determine the role of each of these members in regulating keratinocyte gene expression. Finally, information is beginning to emerge regarding signal transduction in keratinocytes. Some of the early events in signal transduction have been identified (e.g., PLC and PKC activation, etc.) and some of the molecular targets of these pathways (e.g., AP1 transcription factors) are beginning to be identified. Eventually we can expect to elucidation of all of the steps between the interaction of the stimulating agent with its receptor and the activation of target gene expression.

Animals↗

The Oct-1 POU-specific domain can stimulate small nuclear RNA gene transcription by stabilizing the basal transcription complex SNAPc.

The RNA polymerase II and III human small nuclear RNA promoters have a common basal element, the proximal sequence element, which binds the TATA box-binding protein-containing complex SNAPc. They also contain an enhancer characterized by a highly conserved octamer sequence, which constitutes a binding site for the broadly expressed POU domain transcription factor Oct-1. The POU domain is a bipartite DNA-binding domain consisting of a POU-homeo (POUH) domain and a POU-specific (POUs) domain joined by a flexible linker. Here, we show that the Oct-1 POU domain but not the related Pit-1 POU domain can facilitate the binding of SNAPc to the proximal sequence element, and activate transcription. The effect is probably mediated by protein-protein contacts, and 1 of 30 amino acid differences between the Oct-1 and Pit-1 POUs domains is the key determinant for the differential interaction with SNAPc and the ability to activate transcription. These results show that a function that is the hallmark of activation domains, namely, recruitment of a basal transcription complex resulting in activation of transcription, can be performed by a DNA-binding domain. In this case, subtle changes between activator DNA-binding domains, as subtle as a single amino acid difference, can profoundly affect interaction with the basal transcription machinery.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Jun kinase phosphorylates and regulates the DNA binding activity of an octamer binding protein, T-cell factor beta1.

POU domain proteins have been implicated as key regulators during development and lymphocyte activation. The POU domain protein T-cell factor beta1 (TCFbeta1), which binds octamer and octamer-related sequences, is a potent transactivator. In this study, we showed that TCFbeta1 is phosphorylated following activation via the T-cell receptor or by stress-induced signals. Phosphorylation of TCFbeta1 occurred predominantly at serine and threonine residues. Signals which upregulate Jun kinase (JNK)/stress-activated protein kinase activity also lead to association of JNK with TCFbeta1. JNK associates with the activation domain of TCFbeta1 and phosphorylates its DNA binding domain. The phosphorylation of recombinant TCFbeta1 by recombinant JNK enhances the ability of TCFbeta1 to bind to a consensus octamer motif. Consistent with this conclusion, TCFbeta1 upregulates reporter gene transcription in an activation- and JNK-dependent manner. In addition, inhibition of JNK activity by catalytically inactive MEKK (in which methionine was substituted for the lysine at position 432) also inhibits the ability of TCFbeta1 to drive inducible transcription from the interleukin-2 promoter. These results suggest that stress-induced signals and T-cell activation induce JNK, which then acts on multiple cis sequences by modulating distinct transactivators like c-Jun and TCFbeta1. This demonstrates a coupling between the JNK activation pathway and POU domain proteins and implicates TCFbeta1 as a physiological target in the JNK signal transduction pathway leading to coordinated biological responses.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The DNA binding domain (POU domain) of transcription factor oct-1 suffices for stimulation of DNA replication.

Oct-1, also referred to as NFIII, OTF-1, OBP100 or NF-A1, is a ubiquitous sequence-specific DNA binding protein that activates transcription and adenovirus DNA replication. The protein contains a conserved DNA binding domain (POU domain) present in several transcription factors. We have overproduced oct-1, the related oct-2 and several oct-1 deletion mutants in a vaccinia expression system to identify the domains important for activation of DNA replication in vitro. Both oct-1 and oct-2 stimulate adenovirus DNA replication in an octamer-dependent manner. From deletion studies it appears that the 160 amino acid long POU domain suffices for stimulation. This domain consists of two subdomains, a POU-specific and a homeo domain. Deletion of the POU-specific domain revealed that the homeo domain has an intrinsic, but weak DNA binding activity and surprisingly, inhibits DNA replication. As the POU domain does not coincide with the transcription activation domain, these results indicate that, although oct-1 functions both in DNA replication and transcription, the mechanisms underlying these processes are probably distinct.

Adenoviruses, Human↗

Mouse germline restriction of Oct4 expression by germ cell nuclear factor.

The POU-domain transcription factor Oct4 is essential for the maintenance of the mammalian germline. In this study, we show that the germ cell nuclear factor (GCNF), an orphan nuclear receptor, represses Oct4 gene activity by specifically binding within the proximal promoter. GCNF expression inversely correlates with Oct4 expression in differentiating embryonal cells. GCNF overexpression in embryonal cells represses Oct4 gene and transgene activities, and we establish a link to transcriptional corepressors mediating repression by GCNF. In GCNF-deficient mouse embryos, Oct4 expression is no longer restricted to the germ cell lineage after gastrulation. Our studies suggest that GCNF is critical in repressing Oct4 gene activity as pluripotent stem cells differentiate and in confining Oct4 expression to the germline.

Animals↗

Epoc-1: a POU-domain gene expressed in murine epidermal basal cells and thymic stromal cells.

POU-domain transcription factors are known as developmental regulators which control organ development and cell phenotypes. In order to clarify the roles of POU-domain transcription factors in cell differentiation, we cloned a novel POU family gene, Epoc-1, from a murine thymus cDNA library. The amino acid (aa) sequence of the POU-specific domain of Epoc-1 is almost identical to those of Oct-1 and Oct-2. However, within the POU-homeodomain, 13 out of 60 aa differ between Epoc-1 and Oct-2. Recombinant Epoc-1 products were found to bind specifically to the octamer sequence. Epoc-1 was found to be expressed in skin, thymus, stomach and testis. In situ hybridization experiments and RNase protection assays indicated that Epoc-1 is expressed in the epidermal basal cells of the skin, which contain stem cells unipotent for keratinocyte differentiation and in thymic stromal elements. These results suggest that Epoc-1 might be one of the developmental regulators which controls epidermal development and thymic organogenesis.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Twin of I-POU: a two amino acid difference in the I-POU homeodomain distinguishes an activator from an inhibitor of transcription.

I-POU, a POU domain nuclear protein that lacks two conserved basic amino acids of the POU homeodomain is coexpressed in the developing Drosophila nervous system with a second POU domain transcription factor, Cf1-a. I-POU does not bind to DNA but forms a POU domain-mediated, high affinity heterodimer with Cf1-a, inhibiting its ability to bind and activate the dopa decarboxylase gene. The I-POU/Cf1-a dimerization interface encompasses only the N-terminal basic region and helices 1 and 2 of the POU homeodomains with precise amino acid and alpha-helical requirements. twin of I-POU, an alternatively spliced transcript of the I-POU gene, encodes a protein containing the two basic amino acid residues absent in I-POU. Twin of I-POU is incapable of dimerizing with Cf1-a, but can act as a positive transcription factor on targets distinct from those regulated by Cf1-a. These findings suggest that the I-POU genomic locus simultaneously generates both a specific activator and inhibitor of gene transcription, capable of modulating two distinct regulatory programs during neural development.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

POU family transcription factors in the nervous system.

The POU (Pit-Oct-Unc) family of transcription factors was originally defined on the basis of a common DNA binding domain in the mammalian factors Pit-1, Oct-1, and Oct-2 as well as the nematode protein Unc-86. Subsequently, a number of other POU family factors have been identified in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Many of these original and subsequently isolated members of the family have been shown to play critical roles in the development and functioning of the nervous system. To exemplify this, studies are described involving the functional characterisation of the Oct-2 factor, one of the original POU factors, and of the Brn-3 factors, which were isolated subsequently and are the mammalian factors most closely related to Unc-86.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Winged helix hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 and POU-domain protein brn-2/N-oct-3 bind overlapping sites on the neuronal promoter of human aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene.

The neuronal promoter of human aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase gene has been analysed to elucidate the mechanisms of neuron type-specific expression. The (-560/+92) promoter segment was sufficient to direct luciferase expression at a higher level in SK-N-BE neuroblastoma cells, than in CHP126 neuroepithelia, HepG2 hepatoma or SK-Hep1 epithelioma cells. Deletions experiments showed that this segment contained a neuronal-specific (element T1) and a SK-N-BE-specific (element N1) cis-activating sequences. Element T1 (-72/-36) bound Sp1 and NF-Y proteins, and unidentified neuronal-specific factors. Element N1 (-102/-72) bound cell-specific factors, identified as HNF-3, N-Oct-3/Brn-2 and N-Oct-2. HNF-3 proteins recognized the sequence TCAGTAAATA that matches the consensus motif. Oct-1, N-Oct-2 and N-Oct-3 bound the AAATAATGC sequence that overlaps the HNF-3 binding site. In addition, we show that the HNF-3 binding sites from aldolase C and HNF-3beta gene promoters also bind N-Oct-2 and N-Oct-3 proteins. These data suggest a functional interplay of winged helix/forkhead and POU-domain transcription factors on a variety of neuronal gene promoters.

Animals↗

Transcription factor Oct1 binds to the AT-rich segment of the simian virus 40 replication origin.

A cellular protein that binds to the AT-rich late segment of the simian virus 40 (SV40) origin of replication has been identified as transcription factor Oct1. This conclusion is based on the following observations: the late origin binding protein has a molecular mass of about 100 kDa, like factor Oct1, and shares other biochemical properties with Oct1; its binding to the origin is inhibited by antibodies directed against the POU domain of factor Oct1; the isolated POU domain of Oct1 specifically binds to the SV40 late origin region. Thus, the SV40 genome contains binding sites for transcription factor Oct1 in the origin of replication in addition to the previously characterized octamer sites in the viral promoter enhancer. Oct1, bound to the viral origin, negatively affects the DNA unwinding reaction catalyzed by the viral replication initiator T antigen, suggesting that Oct1 may have a role in the regulation of viral replication.

Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming↗

The opposite and antagonistic effects of the closely related POU family transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b on the activity of a target promoter are dependent on differences in the POU domain.

The Brn-3a, Brn-3b, and Brn-3c POU family transcription factors are closely related to one another and are members of the group IV subfamily of POU factors. Here we show that despite this close relationship, the factors have different effects on the activity of a target promoter: Brn-3a and Brn-3c stimulate the promoter whereas Brn-3b represses it. Moreover, Brn-3b can antagonize the stimulatory effect of Brn-3a on promoter activity and can also inhibit promoter activation by the Oct-2.1 POU factor. The difference in the transactivation activities of Brn-3a and Brn-3b is dependent upon the C-terminal region containing the POU domain of the two proteins, since exchange of this domain between the two factors converts Brn-3a into a repressor and Brn-3b into an activator.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The virtuoso of versatility: POU proteins that flex to fit.

During the evolution of eukaryotes, a new structural motif arose by the fusion of genes encoding two different types of DNA-binding domain. The family of transcription factors which contain this domain, the POU proteins, have come to play essential roles not only in the development of highly specialised tissues, such as complex neuronal systems, but also in more general cellular housekeeping. Members of the POU family recognise defined DNA sequences, and a well-studied subset have specificity for a motif known as the octamer element which is found in the promoter region of a variety of genes. The structurally bipartite POU domain has intrinsic conformational flexibility and this feature appears to confer functional diversity to this class of transcription factors. The POU domain for which we have the most structural data is from Oct-1, which binds an eight base-pair target and variants of this octamer site. The two-part DNA-binding domain partially encircles the DNA, with the sub-domains able to assume a variety of conformations, dependent on the DNA element. Crystallographic and biochemical studies have shown that the binary complex provides distinct platforms for the recruitment of specific regulators to control transcription. The conformability of the POU domain in moulding to DNA elements and co-regulators provides a mechanism for combinatorial assembly as well as allosteric molecular recognition. We review here the structure and function of the diverse POU proteins and discuss the role of the proteins' plasticity in recognition and transcriptional regulation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Differential activity of the FGF-4 enhancer in F9 and P19 embryonal carcinoma cells.

Transcription factors Oct-3/4 and Sox2 behave as global regulators during mammalian embryogenesis. They work together by binding co-operatively to closely spaced HMG and POU motifs (HMG/POU cassettes). Recently, it was suggested that a critical Sox2:Oct-3/4 target gene, FGF-4, is expressed at lower levels in P19 than in F9 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells, due to lower levels of Sox2 in P19 than in F9 cells. We tested this possibility to better understand how FGF-4 expression is modulated during development. Although we found that P19 EC cells express approximately 10-fold less FGF-4 mRNA than F9 EC cells, we determined that Sox2 levels do not differ markedly in F9 and P19 EC cells. We also determined that Sox2 and Oct-3/4 work together equally well in both EC cell lines. Moreover, in contrast to an earlier prediction based on in vitro binding studies, we demonstrate that the function of the HMG/POU cassettes of the FGF-4 and UTF1 genes does not differ significantly in these EC cell lines when tested in the context of a natural enhancer. Importantly, we determined that the FGF-4 promoter is highly responsive to a heterologous enhancer in both EC cell lines; whereas, the FGF-4 enhancer is 7- to 10-fold less active in P19 than in F9 EC cells. Because F9 and P19 EC cells are likely to represent cells at different stages of mammalian development, we suggest that this difference in FGF-4 enhancer activity may reflect a mechanism used to decrease, but not abolish, FGF-4 expression as the early embryo develops.

Animals↗

Transcription factors and the control of inner ear development.

The development of the cells and tissues of the inner ear is controlled in part by the sequential expression of transcription factors, and recent studies have begun to define the roles played by such factors in morphogenesis of the labyrinth. A number of transcription factors have been shown to be expressed during inner ear development. Moreover, several genetic disorders of inner ear development in human and mouse have recently been identified as being caused by mutations of genes controlling transcription factors. In addition, the targeted mutation of several transcription factor genes influence the development of specific inner ear cell types, and suggest a critical role for these factors in controlling inner ear cell lineages. In particular, the POU-domain transcription factors are widely expressed in the developing ear. Gene deletion studies suggest that the Class IV POU-domain transcription factor Brn-3.1 is required for the development of auditory and vestibular hair cells, while Brn-3.0 is necessary for appropriate migration and numbers of spiral ganglion neurons.

Journal Article↗

Evidence that POU factor Brn-3B regulates expression of Pax-6 in neuroretina cells.

The Pax-6 gene encodes a transcriptional master regulator involved in the development of the eye. The quail Pax-6 gene is expressed in the neuroretina from two promoters, P0 and P1, and is regulated by an intragenic neuroretina-specific enhancer (EP enhancer). The activity of this enhancer is restricted to the P0 promoter, which is activated at the onset of neuronal differentiation. In this article, we show that the POU domain transcription factor Brn-3b, which is expressed in various regions of the brain including retina and sensory neurons, is one of the factors interacting with the EP enhancer. Brn-3b strongly activates the EP enhancer in neuroretina cells but not in other cell types. Interestingly, this activation appears to be specific for Brn-3b, as the closely related POU factors Brn-3a and Brn-3c do not show activation of the EP enhancer. Our results identify the Pax-6 gene as a new potential downstream effector of the POU transcription factor Brn-3b.

Animals↗

Repression of the myelin P0 gene by the POU transcription factor SCIP.

SCIP is a POU domain transcription factor expressed by Schwann cells, the myelin-forming glial cells of the peripheral nervous system. In this study, we investigate SCIP regulation of the gene encoding P0, the major structural protein of peripheral myelin. We find that SCIP represses transcription of this gene through the joint action of the SCIP POU domain and an amino terminal domain that acts cell specifically. Maximal repression is DNA-binding-dependent, and analysis of the P0 promoter reveals the presence of multiple SCIP binding sites. Surprisingly, none of these sites in their native positions dramatically affect P0 promoter activity or its repression by SCIP, although they mediate repression when moved closer to the P0 transcription start site. We propose that repression occurs through a quenching mechanism mediated by the SCIP POU and amino terminal domains acting in concert with other nuclear proteins, including a Schwann cell-specific adapter.

Animals↗