Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ORTHOPEDICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Managing orthopedics and neurosciences costs through standard treatment protocols.

High-cost, high-volume specialty programs such as orthopedics and neurosciences find themselves in a position of evaluating the costs and in some cases the appropriateness of medical practices in response to payer scrutiny and provider selection processes. Orthopedics and neurosciences programs are at a stage of development analogous to that of cardiovascular care several years ago. Many of the same trends have come into play, such as payer "carve-outs" for orthopedic services, payer selection of centers of excellence based on cost and quality, reduction of Medicare reimbursement, greater use of high-cost technology, the decline of profitability due to "older, sicker, and tougher" patients, and the recent emergence of national orthopedic specialty networks oriented to national contracts for care. In an era in which payers demand value on both sides of the cost-plus-quality equation, programs are challenged to maximize the return on a patient population rife with "no-win" situations. In the orthopedic service line these include a high proportion of Medicare patients and chronic conditions such as workers' compensation medical back cases or repetitive motion injuries, which can be elusive to diagnose and expensive to treat. Many hospitals continue to lose money on joint replacement surgeries, the largest-volume orthopedic inpatient service, primarily because of the high Medicare population and the cost of implants. Neuroservices, while still relatively well reimbursed, face a rising proportion of Medicare payments as patients live longer and develop chronic, degenerative conditions. Inpatient days are decreasing due to payer pressures to limit hospital stays and to shift inpatient care to outpatient services. Some hospitals "have lost interest in (the orthopedic) service line during the last five years because of recent trends in orthopedic-related inpatient volume and payment." But by managing costs strategically, both the neurosciences and orthopedics service lines can provide substantial revenue as well as the opportunity to achieve a "center of excellence" competitive position in a managed care environment. This Special Report outlines the process and advantages of managing costs and quality of care strategically, that is, in a manner which helps these programs meet internal cost and clinical goals while responding to market situations. The hospital, physicians, and patients all benefit as costs are reduced, quality is enhanced, and the service line's competitive position is strengthened.

Cost Control↗

Misrepresentation of research publications among orthopedic surgery fellowship applicants: a comparison with documented misrepresentations in other fields.

Study Design. A retrospective study was used to review fellowship applications over 3 years. Objectives. To assess the prevalence of research misrepresentation in orthopedic fellowship applications, and to compare such activity between subspecialties (e.g. spine, sports, hand). Summary of Background Data. Competition for orthopedic surgery fellowships is intense. The applicant pool includes orthopedic, plastic, and general surgeons, as well as neurosurgeons. Residency and fellowship training programs in other disciplines have documented shocking levels of misrepresentation in the curriculum vitae of prospective applicants. However, no study has looked at orthopedic residents applying for subspecialty fellowship programs. Methods. A retrospective analysis investigated 280 applications for fellowship positions in the department of orthopedic surgery at the authors' academic institution from 1996 to 1998 inclusively. To allow for press and publication delays, a minimum 24-month follow-up period was instituted. The listings of applicants' research publications were analyzed for evidence of misrepresentation through an exhaustive literature search. Only the most obvious confirmable discrepancies were labeled as misrepresentations. The results then were compared with those found in studies conducted in other fields: gastroenterology fellowship, emergency medicine residency, pediatric residency, dermatology residency, orthopedic residency, and medical faculty applications. Results. Among 280 (54%) applicants for orthopedic surgery candidates, 151 claimed journal publications. It was found that 16 (10.6%) of these 151 applicants had misrepresented their citations. This rate was highest in spine fellowship applicants (20%). However, considering the numbers available, this was not significantly different among the various subspecialty fellowship applicants (P>0.1). In addition, various demographic data did not correlate with the rate of misrepresentation (P>0.1). These results are comparable with those reported in other medical fields (P>0.1). Conclusions. Misrepresentation occurs in orthopedic fellowship applications at a rate comparable with that observed in other fields. This rate is not different among the various subspecialties in orthopedics. Policies that may lessen the incidence of falsification on curriculum vitae should be instituted in an attempt to curb such activity.

Fellowships and Scholarships↗

[Proposals for adapting a DRG system in the fields of orthopedics and trauma surgery for 2004].

The introduction of the DRG system in Germany-optional since 1 January 2003 and mandatory for all hospitals as of 1 January 2004-has resulted in great uncertainty, particularly on the part of hospitals, since apprehension prevails that the diagnostic and therapeutic measures practiced in Germany will not be appropriately represented and remunerated by a DRG system. The G-DRG version 1.0 prepared within the framework of substitutive execution is largely identical to the Australian AR-DRG version 4.1. Adjustments that do justice to the realities of German treatment modalities were at most insignificant. It is therefore essential that stock be taken for each medical specialty to determine to what extent treatment procedures commonly followed in Germany are adequately reflected in this G-DRG system or whether adjustments are necessary to make allowances for German realities. To be able to provide qualified statements on the problems involved, scientific analysis of possible problems is necessary utilizing German data. Thus, we undertook an evaluation of how the special fields of orthopedics and accident surgery are represented in the G-DRG system. The resultant data form the basis for evidence of presumable deficits in the representation of orthopedic and accident surgery cases in the G-DRG system. The German Association for Trauma Surgery and the German Association for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery have undertaken a DRG evaluation project together with the Organization of Directors for Accident Surgery (chairperson: Professor Dr. Mischkowsky, Kempten), the Organization of Directors for Orthopedics (chairperson: Professor Dr. Puhl, Ulm), the DRG Working Group of the German Association for Accident Surgery, and the Joint Commission of the Professional Association of German Surgeons and the German Association for Surgery in cooperation with the DRG Research Group of the University Clinic Muenster, the German Hospital Association, and the German Medical Association with the goal of examining the medical and economic homogeneity of the case groups. A total of 12,645 orthopedic and trauma surgery cases were collected from 23 clinics-11 university hospitals and 12 non-university hospitals-and assessed. On the basis of this database and when too few cases were evaluable also based on clinical considerations, 14 adjustment proposals were formulated and submitted on schedule on 31 March 2003 to the Institute for Hospital Remuneration. The results of the DRG evaluation project illustrated the problems involved in representing the exceedingly heterogeneous and complex activities of orthopedic and trauma surgery departments in a flat rate financing system that is not attuned to the realties of German treatment procedures. Version 1.0 of the G-DRG system is not sufficiently differentiated to represent the multifaceted diagnostic and therapeutic services provided by trauma surgery and orthopedic departments in Germany.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗

[Physicians founders of orthopedic surgery in Serbia].

The beginnings of the development of orthopedic surgery in Serbia have been related to the name of Dr Nikola Krstić and his first radiography of the hand in 1908. The foundation of the Orthopedic Ward, led by Dr Nikola Krstić, within the General State Hospital in Belgrade, in 1919, marks the definition of orthopedics as a separate branch of surgery. In addition to Dr Nikola Krstić, Dr Borivoje Lalović and Temp. Docent Dr Borivoje Gradojević, who published the first orthopedics textbook in Serbian in 1934, also worked at the orthopedic ward between the two world wars. The work at the orthopedic ward, which grew into a clinic in 1947, was continued by Prof. Dr Milos Simović, Prof. Dr Svetislav Stojanović and Prof. Dr Ljubisa Dorić. Their successors would have high achievements: Prof. Dr Zivojin Bumbasirević became the only orthopedist who was a regular member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, and Chief of Staff Dr Predrag Klisić and Prof. Dr Branko Radulović provide impetus for further development of orthopedics by founding Specialist Orthopedics Hospital "Banjica".

History, 20th Century↗

Selective dorsal rhizotomy and rates of orthopedic surgery in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

If the spasticity of cerebral palsy (CP) is reduced in children at a young age by selective dorsal rhizotomy, the incidence of lower-extremity deformities requiring orthopedic surgery may be reduced; however, this has never been investigated in detail. The authors examined the effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy on rates of lower-extremity orthopedic surgery in 178 children with CP. Age at selective dorsal rhizotomy ranged from 2 to 19.3 years (mean 5.5 years) with follow-up intervals ranging from 24 to 70 months (mean 44 months). Spastic CP was classified as quadriplegia (33%), diplegia (65%), and hemiplegia (2%). To assess the effects of early versus late rhizotomy on rates of orthopedic surgery, patients were grouped as follows: Group I underwent rhizotomy between 2 and 4 years of age (54 patients), and Group II underwent rhizotomy between 5 and 19 years of age (124 patients). Comparison of Kaplan-Meier plots of lifetime orthopedic surgery rates revealed that Group II underwent orthopedic surgery at a higher rate than Group I (p = 0.037). Analysis by procedure type revealed higher orthopedic surgery rates in Group II than Group I for heel cord releases (p = 0.0025), adductor releases (p = 0.018), and hamstring releases (p = 0.02). Orthopedic surgery rates were no higher for Group II compared to Group I for ankle/foot operations (p = 0.023), femoral osteotomy (p = 0.25), iliopsoas releases (p = 0.35), and "other" operations (p = 0.013). The data indicate that early rhizotomy reduces the need for orthopedic surgery for heel cord, hamstring, and adductor releases.

Adolescent↗

Orthopedic surgery after selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic diplegia in relation to ambulatory status and age.

OBJECT: A retrospective study was performed to determine the following: 1) whether children who walk independently after selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) undergo fewer subsequent orthopedic operations than those who walk with assistance; and 2) the effect of age at SDR on the rate of orthopedic operations. METHODS: The cases of 158 children with spastic diplegia who were 2 to 14 years of age when they underwent SDR were followed over a 5- to 9-year period. Patients were grouped by age at the time of SDR as follows: 2 to 3 years (Group 1), 4 to 7 years (Group 2), and 8 to 14 years (Group 3). Follow-up data showed that children in all age groups who walked independently after SDR underwent fewer orthopedic operations than did children who walked with assistance. Overall rates of orthopedic surgery 5 to 9 years after SDR at last follow up were 24% for independent walkers and 51% for assisted walkers. Two-way categorical analysis (age group by ambulation) yielded a highly significant effect of ambulation (p = 0.0003). Children in Group 1 needed the fewest orthopedic operations at follow-up evaluation. In the older age groups (Groups 2 and 3), those who walked independently at the time of SDR underwent fewer orthopedic operations after SDR than did walkers who required assistance (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data are of value in advising parents about the likelihood of orthopedic surgery based on the child's gait status both at the time of SDR and at follow-up evaluation. Orthopedic surgery is more likely in patients destined to be nonambulators.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The industrial orthopedic rehabilitation market: a niche opportunity.

The industrial orthopedic rehabilitation market is an opportunity for hospitals of all sizes to provide a needed service with significant revenue potential. For a 250-bed community hospital, an industrial orthopedic rehabilitation program can generate $3.5 to $4 million in revenue. Based on the authors' experience, contribution margins from the programs, if designed properly, can range from 30% to 40%. A well-designed industrial orthopedic rehabilitation program adds to a strong orthopedics product line by providing continuity of care and the "extras" that make a program successful. For a hospital that is developing an orthopedics product line and trying to build a presence in the marketplace, an industrial orthopedic rehabilitation program can introduce your services to local employers, opening the door for their use of other "high tech" orthopedic services that you provide. Industrial rehabilitation is synonymous with what is often referred to in health care as the outpatient "workers' compensation" or "injured workers"' market. Essentially, this market consists of employees whose on-the-job injuries or job-related chronic conditions require medical care. These injuries may or may not involve lost workdays during which injured employees are unable to perform job functions. Since the orthopedic segment of the industrial rehabilitation market represents the bulk of the injuries and costs, developing the services and programs that can produce return to work (or case settled) outcomes for these workers represents a sound opportunity for health care providers. However, since workers' compensation insurance is liability (not health care) insurance, understanding the rules and regulations specific to this insurance segment in your state, along with the needs of all the key players in the system, is the key to developing programmatic elements critical to long-term success.

Hospitals, Community↗

Interpretation by radiologists of orthopedic total joint radiographs: is it necessary or cost-effective?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the necessity and cost-effectiveness of interpretation by radiologists of orthopedic radiographs obtained for patients who undergo total hip or knee replacement. DESIGN: A prospective study. Serial preoperative and postoperative x-ray films of the joint in patients scheduled to undergo total hip or knee joint replacement during one calendar year were interpreted by both radiology and orthopedic department staff and compared. Intraoperative findings were used to confirm the radiologic interpretation. The follow-up was 1 year. SETTING: A university teaching hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Primary or revision total hip or knee replacement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in interpretation of radiographs by radiologists and orthopedic surgeons for any of the four procedures. A change in orthopedic management. RESULTS: For preoperative radiographs, there were no discrepancies between the radiologists and orthopedic surgeons with respect to primary joint replacement. For 100 revision procedures there were 15 discrepancies, but in all cases the orthopedic surgeon's interpretation proved to be correct. For the postoperative radiographs, there were no discrepancies in the group of revision hip replacements. For the other three groups there were a total of six discrepancies and in all cases the orthopedic surgeon's interpretation was correct. In two cases conditions were present that were not recognized by staff from either the radiology department or orthopedic department. CONCLUSION: Interpretation by radiologists of total joint radiographs in patients who undergo primary or revision total hip or knee replacement arthroplasty is not necessary or cost-effective.

Canada↗

Biomechanical performance of orthopedic gloves.

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of commercially available orthopedic gloves to that of a single surgical glove, as well as a double glove system. The orthopedic gloves were found to be thicker than the single surgical glove. This increased thickness of the orthopedic glove was associated with a greater resistance to glove puncture. The thickest orthopedic gloves also had reduced tactile sensitivity when compared to the single surgical glove. In addition, the glove donning forces and glove hydration rates varied considerably. These latter biomechanical performance parameters were not significantly related to glove thickness. The double glove systems tested in this study had similar performance characteristics in regard to many of the orthopedic gloves. The glove donning forces for the double glove systems were the lowest of the gloves tested. In addition, the double glove systems displayed the greatest resistance to glove hydration of the gloves tested. Their performance in the glove hydration tests and the force required to don the double glove systems were much more desirable than any of the orthopedic gloves. The results of this study indicate that the double glove systems may provide a desirable alternative to the use of the single orthopedic gloves.

Biocompatible Materials↗

Interdisciplinary study of orthopedic and orthodontic findings in pre-school infants.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The assessment of correlations between orthopedic and orthodontic data based on interdisciplinary studies is of scientific and practical interest in the differentiation of preventive diagnostic and therapeutic fields between orthodontics and orthopedics. In the published literature there are various studies analyzing the correlations between specific Angle classes and orthopedic parameters. Results of these studies indicate a potential correlation between scoliosis and Class II malocclusion as well as between weak body posture and Class II malocclusion. The aim of the present interdisciplinary study was to examine correlations between orthodontic and orthopedic findings in pre-school infants and to evaluate them with respect to preventive recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 59 pre-school infants (29 boys, 30 girls) aged 3.5-6.8 years (mean: 5.0 years) were enrolled in this study. A standardized orthodontic and orthopedic examination protocol was used. RESULTS: The orthodontic examination showed Angle class distributions comparable with those in non-selected groups (Class I: 63%, Class II: 32%, Class III: 5%). The orthopedic examination revealed pathologic findings in 52% of the subjects, with statistically significant correlations between scoliosis and Class II malocclusion (p = 0.033) and between weak body posture and Class II malocclusion (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded from the results that the orthodontic finding of Angle Class II in pre-school infants should induce prophylactic screening. The orthodontist could then not only initiate early orthodontic treatment to prevent incisor trauma in patients with extreme overjet, but could also take account of potential orthopedic malformations on a preventive interdisciplinary basis in pre-school infants with Class II malocclusions.

Child↗

[History of orthopedics in East Germany 1949-1990].

The following article deals with the essential aspects of the history of German orthopedics between 1949 and 1990 in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). Starting from the prevailing situation after World War II, the growth of orthopedic care in the GDR is described and the development of national orthopedic centers in the former GDR is summarized. In this context, reference is made to those public figures who played a leading role in this process, in particular F. Löffler, P.F. Scheel, and P.F. Matzen. In addition, the influence of social conditions in the GDR on the development of orthopedics and the resultant constraints are presented. Moreover, this contribution depicts the progress of orthopedic science in the former GDR and describes such salient aspects as the appearance of the specialized journal Beiträge zur Orthopädie und Traumatologie (Essays on Orthopedics and Traumatology), the Gesellschaft für Orthopädie der DDR (Association for Orthopedics in the GDR), and the annual conferences held by the this association.

Congresses as Topic↗

[Development of rheumatoid arthritis orthopedics in German-speaking countries].

In the realization that the cause of and thus an appropriate curative systemic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis did not and does not exist, surgical treatment of this usually destructive disease emerged as a major field in orthopedics in collaboration with internists specialized in rheumatology. The establishment of working groups within the scientific society initiated by the German Association for Orthopedics and Traumatology (DGOT) in 1971 to improve efficiency was a decisive factor for the further development in the German-speaking countries. A significant role was played by the fact that the Swiss N. Gschwend from Zurich was entrusted with the formation of the working group. This ensured that other German-speaking colleagues in Austria as well as Scandinavia also had the opportunity to add their input and influence rheumatoid orthopedics to a large extent. The DGOT also supported the creation of the ARO, which was founded as an independent association within the DGOT in 1992. The growth of rheumatoid orthopedics received considerable impetus from the fact that it was recognized in 1981 as the only subspecialty of orthopedics granted equal footing, as was the case for rheumatology in internal medicine. At the start of the 1970s, interest was focused on synovectomy for joint preservation, also with regard to its techniques and the possibility for preventive indications. Influenced by the experience gained from the development of endoprosthetic replacements, arthrodeses for rheumatic patients, e.g., in the region of the shoulder and knee joints, were almost completely ignored. The special field of reconstructive surgery on the hand and wrist employing implantation of finger joints and limited arthrodeses yielded impressive subjective and partially functional improvement for the patients. New impulses in the surgical treatment of foot deformities with joint-saving techniques for toe joints and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the ankle have brought about new trends in rheumatoid orthopedics in the past 10 years. Operative stabilization of cervical instabilities represents a special aspect in the development of rheumatoid orthopedics. Both the differential indication and the surgical technique have changed. The development of magnet resonance tomography and new implants for the cervical spine has played a significant role. Rheumatoid arthritis surgery has shown preference to integrating physical measures including in particular ergotherapy and special hand therapy into local surgical interventions. Functional treatment measures, care of braces and aids, and training in joint protection have become a firm part of the therapeutic concept. It is significant that in the German-speaking countries a treatment plan focused solely on the joints has thus far not gained general acceptance as is the case in Anglo-American countries. Preference is given to working as a team with subspecialties for upper and lower extremities and the spinal column. This guarantees that the priorities of the patients who usually present with multiple joint alterations can be dealt with by one group.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

Adolescent screening for orthopedic problems in high school.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of orthopedic screening programs for school-age children are still controversial. We conducted a prospective study in order to determine the frequency of undiagnosed orthopedic problems in an adolescent population. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of undiagnosed orthopedic problems in an adolescent population discovered through routine physical examinations carried out by a general pediatrician in a school clinic. METHODS: We examined 2380 adolescents attending a public high school over a 5 y period in order to determine the frequency of undiagnosed orthopedic abnormalities in this age group. RESULTS: Previously undiagnosed orthopedic findings, especially spinal deformities were found in 14.8%. Scoliosis was detected in 1.6% of the entire group with a threefold predominance of girls over boys. Few cases were progressive and needed surgery. Extra spinal orthopedic findings were found in 2.9% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Screening programs can identify previously undetected orthopedic abnormalities in the school-age population. We conclude that screening programs for school age children coupled with subsequent follow-up procedures are worthwhile.

Adolescent↗

Women in orthopedic surgery residencies in the United States.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect that increased numbers of women medical school graduates have had on the composition of orthopedic surgery residencies, and to evaluate trends over time in the likelihood of women medical students to select orthopedic residencies. METHOD: The author analyzed JAMA's "Reports on Graduate and Undergraduate Medical Education" for the years 1977 to 1996, calculating the numbers of women and men in orthopedic surgery and other surgery residencies, and medical school composition. RESULTS: Although there have been modest gains in the number of women in orthopedic surgery training programs in the United States, women continue to choose orthopedics only one-seventh as often as do men. CONCLUSION: Orthopedics remains an unattractive career choice for women medical students compared with their men counterparts. Biases and stereotypes about women and about orthopedic surgery may account for this difference.

Career Choice↗

Qualitative evaluation of a form for standardized information exchange between orthopedic surgeons and occupational physicians.

BACKGROUND: Both occupational physicians and orthopedic surgeons can be involved in the management of work relevant musculoskeletal disorders. These physicians hardly communicate with each other and this might lead to different advice to the patient. Therefore, we evaluated a standardized information exchange form for the exchange of relevant information between the orthopedic surgeon and the occupational physician. The main goals of this qualitative study are to evaluate whether the form improved information exchange, whether the form gave relevant information, and to generate ideas to further improve this information exchange. METHODS: The information exchange form was developed in two consensus meetings with five orthopedic surgeons and five occupational physicians. To evaluate the information exchange form, a qualitative evaluation was set up. Structured telephone interviews were undertaken with the patients, interviews with the physicians were face-to-face and semi-structured, based on a topic list. These interviews were recorded and literally transcribed. Each interview was analyzed separately in Atlas-Ti. RESULTS: The form was used for 8 patients, 7 patients agreed to participate in the qualitative evaluation. All three orthopedic surgeons involved and three of the six involved occupational physicians agreed to be interviewed. The form was transferred to 4 occupational physicians, the other 3 patients recovered before they visited the occupational physician. The information on the form was regarded to be useful. All orthopedic surgeons agreed that the occupational physician should take the initiative. Most physicians felt that the form should not be filled out for each patient visiting an orthopedic surgeon, but only for those patients who do not recover as expected. Orthopedic surgeons suggested that a copy of the medical information provided to the general practitioner could also be provided to occupational physicians. CONCLUSION: The information exchange form was regarded to be useful and could be used in practice. The occupational physician should take the initiative for using this form and most physicians felt the information should only be exchanged for patients who do not recover as expected. That means that the advantage of giving information early in the treatment is lost.

Adolescent↗

The effects of active infant orthopedics on occlusal relationships in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of active infant orthopedic treatment on dental arch relationships and determine the effect on maxillary growth in children born with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCCLP). DESIGN: The GOSLON Yardstick was used to assess dental models taken on patients treated with and without active infant orthopedics. PATIENTS: Two groups of nonsyndromic Caucasian children born with UCCLP (total n = 40), all treated by the same surgeon and ranging from 5 to 10 years of age, were evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: One group had a Latham dentomaxillary alignment (DMA) appliance inserted at 5 to 6 weeks of age, after which a lip-nasal adhesion was performed at an average age of 3.5 months. This was followed by more definitive nasolabial repair at the average age of 5.9 months. Those patients treated without preoperative orthopedics underwent a lip-nasal adhesion at average age 1.5 months followed by nasolabial repair at average age 5.1 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Randomized assessments using the GOSLON Yardstick were done independently at two separate times by three different examiners. Differences in GOSLON scores between the active orthopedic group and nonorthopedic group were evaluated by both categorical and continuous statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean GOSLON score was 3.30 for the orthopedic group and 3.21 for the nonorthopedic group. There was no significant group difference in the modal scores of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that active infant orthopedics does not affect the dental arch relationships in preadolescent children with repaired UCCLP, compared with a similar group treated without orthopedic intervention at this center.

Activator Appliances↗

Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: To understand better the barriers among orthopedic surgeons and primary care physicians in identifying and treating possible osteoporosis in patients hospitalized with a fragility fracture sustained spontaneously or from a fall no greater than standing height. METHODS: A 1-page, 7-question survey was sent to 35 admitting orthopedic surgeons and 75 primary care physicians at a midwestern managed care organization in March 2001. Returned surveys were collected until 30 days had passed since the mailing. Primary care physicians were board-certified family practitioners and internal medicine physicians. All orthopedists were admitting surgeons in the hospital system. Responders were anonymous, and posted surveys were returned to the Orthopaedic Collaborative Practice office. The surveys were color-coded to separate responses from orthopedic surgeons and primary care physicians. RESULTS: Thirty-one surveys were returned: 23 (31%) from primary care physicians and 8 (23%) from orthopedic surgeons. Survey respondents agreed that the responsibility for postfracture attention to nutritional needs, including calcium and vitamin D, rested with the primary care provider. When asked about barriers to recommending bone mineral density testing with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, 9 primary care physicians (39%) thought this type of testing was unnecessary for treatment, and 4 primary care physicians (17%) thought a barrier was caused by patient frailty. Primary care physicians indicated that potential adverse effects of medication (n=14 [61%]) and cost of therapy (n=13 [57%]) were the main factors limiting treatment. When asked to identify the single most important barrier in treatment, 14 physicians (61%) indicated cost was the greatest deterrent. Twenty-one primary care physicians (91%) reported they would be more likely to treat a patient with osteoporosis if a safe medication with proven fracture risk reduction were available. Primary care physicians indicated they were more likely to treat independently living adults (n=12 [52%]) and women compared with men (n=15 [65%]). All orthopedic surgeons (n=8) were willing for all patients to be evaluated in consultation with a nurse practitioner. Primary care respondents were less apt to agree with a nurse practitioner referral (n=5 [22%]). Both primary care physicians (n=16 [70%]) and orthopedic surgeons (n=4 [50%]) agreed that there is a need for increased primary care education about managing osteoporosis in patients hospitalized with low-impact fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopedic surgeons were consistent in their opinion that postfracture attention to osteoporosis should rest with the primary care physician. Primary care physicians agree but report that cost and possible adverse effects of medication are major barriers to this care. Despite therapies for high-risk postfracture patients showing relative safety and proven efficacy in reducing future fractures, deterrents to this care are focused on cost and potential adverse effects. Further education is needed to promote a standard of care for the postfracture patient that is directed toward the prevention of a subsequent fracture.

Aged↗

Orthopedic patients' satisfaction with their health care plan: a study performed by the Research and Education Committee of the Texas Orthopaedic Association.

To determine the satisfaction of orthopedic patients in regards to their health care plan, a four-page questionnaire was designed, pilot tested, and sent to 200 orthopedic surgeons randomly selected from members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons in Texas. Fifty-seven orthopedic surgeons were not eligible to participate; our eligible cohort was 143 orthopedic surgeons. These surgeons were asked to administer the questionnaire to 20 randomly selected patients. Fifty-six of the 143 orthopedic surgeons participated, and surveys were completed by 939 patients. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with their health insurance, access to primary care physicians, and access to orthopedic surgeons. Although satisfaction was generally high, the patients with a gate-keeper (no direct access to specialists) were significantly less satisfied with their access to primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons than those without a gatekeeper.

Female↗