Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nucleosomes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Specificity of monoclonal anti-nucleosome auto-antibodies derived from lupus mice.

Recently, anti-nucleosome antibodies, which do not bind to DNA or to individual histones, have been identified in longitudinal studies in lupus mice. These anti-nucleosome antibodies occur early in spontaneous SLE and are formed prior to other anti-nuclear specificities. However, nucleosomal epitopes are yet to be fully characterized. We selected a panel of six monoclonal anti-nucleosome antibodies (mAbs) (#2, #32, #34, PL2-6, LG8-1 and LG10-1) derived from lupus mice. These mAbs were tested in ELISA on subnucleosome structures and on a panel of 53 histone peptides, covering the entire sequence of the five histones. Two mAbs reacted with one of these peptides, but the reactivity hardly exceeded the background reactivity. Based on the nucleosome and subnucleosome ELISA we identified different recognition patterns. Three mAbs showed the highest reactivity towards the intact nucleosome. For two of them (#32 and LG8-1) the nucleosomal epitope was primarily located on H2A-H2B/DNA, whereas for mAb #34 this primary epitope was located on H3/H4/DNA. Two mAbs (#2 and PL2-6) showed the highest reactivity with H2A-H2B/DNA and one mAb (LG10-1) recognized H3-H4/DNA. In the subnucleosome ELISA all but one (mAb #32) recognized more than one epitope, including DNA complexed to a variety of cationic molecules. Comparing these reactivities we identified for all mAbs one specific nucleosomal epitope, whereas reactivity with other subnucleosomes was comparable to the reactivity towards DNA complexed with cationic molecules. In inhibition experiments both in ELISA and in immunofluorescence it was found that only one of the mAbs (i.e. PL2-6), recognizing an epitope on H2A-H2B/DNA as primary epitope, could be inhibited by H2A-H2B/DNA in fluid phase. The two mAbs recognizing an epitope on H3-H4/DNA as primary epitope could be inhibited by H3-H4/DNA in fluid phase. From these analyses, we conclude first that for these nucleosome specific mAbs linear histone peptides are not very important. Second, that these mAbs all recognize different epitopes on both H2A/H2B-DNA and H3/H4-DNA and third that some solid phase H2A/H2B-DNA epitopes are not expressed on fluid phase H2A/H2B-DNA. Our findings suggest that in SLE the nucleosome can act as auto-antigen and that there is no immunodominant beta cell epitope within the nucleosome.

Animals↗

Nucleosome transcription studied in a real-time synchronous system: test of the lexosome model and direct measurement of effects due to histone octamer.

We report the development of an alternative approach to studies on nucleosome transcription in vitro. This model system allows us to follow the real-time, synchronous and single passage of RNA polymerase molecules as they progress through DNA packaged in nucleosomes. Results are obtained using phage T7 RNA polymerase with reconstituted nucleosomes prepared from native histones or from histones in which the two H3 Cys 110 thiol groups have been oxidized to form a disulfide bridge. The lengths and concentrations of radiolabeled transcripts produced as a function of time provide direct measurements of the velocities of transcription on naked DNA and on the nucleosomal particles, and allow both relative and absolute efficiencies of initiation, elongation and completion to be determined. These direct measurements of reveal new features of the elongation process. The velocities of elongation on the nucleosomal templates are slightly but reproducibly slower than those on naked DNA. This difference is found to be due to a slight increase in pausing on the nucleosomal templates. Remarkably, the sites of this increased pausing on the nucleosomal templates are also pause sites on the naked DNA. The velocities of elongation on native or oxidized nucleosomal templates are found to be identical to within +/- 10%. We conclude that nucleosomes having covalently bound H3 molecules are substrates for transcription, suggesting that the splitting of the nucleosome postulated in the lexosome model of nucleosome transcription is not a necessary event. Interesting future applications of this methodology are discussed.

Animals↗

Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. IV. DNA supercoiling and nucleosome sequence preference.

Nucleosome formation on inverted repeats or on some alternations of purines and pyrimidines can be inhibited in vitro by DNA supercoiling through their supercoiling-induced structural transitions to cruciforms or Z-form DNA, respectively. We report here, as a result of study of single nucleosome reconstitutions on a DNA minicircle, that a physiological level of DNA supercoiling can also enhance nucleosome sequence preference. The 357 base-pair minicircle was composed of a promoter of phage SP6 RNA polymerase joined to a 256 base-pair fragment containing a sea urchin 5 S RNA gene. Nucleosome formation on the promoter was found to be enhanced on a topoisomer with in vivo superhelix density when compared to topoisomers of lower or higher superhelical densities, to the nicked circle, or to the linear DNA. In contrast, nucleosomes at other positions appeared to be insensitive to supercoiling. This observation relied on a novel procedure for the investigation of nucleosome positioning. The reconstituted circular chromatin was first linearized using a restriction endonuclease, and the linear chromatin so obtained was electrophoresed as nucleoprotein in a polyacrylamide gel. The gel showed well-fractionated bands whose mobilities were a V-like function of nucleosome positions, with the nucleosome near the middle migrating less. This behavior is similar to that previously observed for complexes of sequence-specific DNA-bending proteins with circularly permuted DNA fragments, and presumably reflects the change in the direction of the DNA axis between the entrance and the exit of the particle. Possible mechanisms for such supercoiling-induced modulation of nucleosome formation are discussed in the light of the supercoiling-dependent susceptibility to cleavage of the naked minicircle with S1 and Bal31 nucleases; and a comparison between DNase I cleavage patterns of the modulated nucleosome and of another, non-modulated, overlapping nucleosome.

Animals↗

Selective arrangement of ubiquitinated and D1 protein-containing nucleosomes within the Drosophila genome.

We have a new approach, two-dimensional hybridization mapping of nucleosomes, to compare the structures of mononucleosomes from different regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Approximately one in two nucleosomes of the transcribed copia and heat-shock 70 (hsp 70) genes in nonshocked cultured cells contains ubiquitin-H2A (uH2A) semihistone, a covalent conjugate of histone H2A and a small protein, ubiquitin. In striking contrast, less than one in 25 nucleosomes of tandemly repeated, nontranscribed 1.688 satellite DNA contains uH2A, suggesting that most of the nucleosomal uH2A is located in transcribed genes. Approximately 25% of all nucleosomes are ubiquitinated in nonsynchronized cultured Drosophila cells. The hsp 70 genes in nonshocked cells occur in nucleosomes, are greatly enriched in uH2A and are not digested preferentially by staphylococcal nuclease. In contrast, the same genes in chromatin from heat-shocked cells are highly sensitive to staphylococcal nuclease and no longer possess nucleosomal organization recognizable with this probe. Histone ubiquitination in transcribed nucleosomes may prevent formation of higher order chromosomal structures by modifying nucleosome-nucleosome interactions. The observed loss of nucleosomal organization in very actively transcribed genes, such as the hsp 70 genes in shocked cells, may be related to the recent finding that ubiquitin conjugates are substrates for the cytoplasmic ATP-dependent proteolytic system. We have also found that 1.688 satellite mononucleotomes contain a specific approximately 50,000 dalton nonhistone protein, D1, in addition to being extremely under-ubiquitinated. D1 may be involved in formation of the highly compact structure of satellite heterochromatin.

Animals↗

A fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based probe to monitor nucleosome structure.

Nucleosomes are the basic units of eukaryotic chromatin structure. By restricting factor access to regulatory DNA sequences, nucleosomes significantly impact genomic processes such as transcription, and various mechanisms to alter nucleosome structure to relieve this repression have evolved. Both nucleosomes and processes that alter them are inherently dynamic in nature. Thus, studies of dynamics will be necessary to truly understand these relief mechanisms. We describe here the characteristics of a novel fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based reporter that can clearly signal the formation of a canonical nucleosome structure and follow conformational and compositional changes in that structure, both at the ensemble-average (bulk) and at the single molecule level. Labeled nucleosomes behave conformationally and thermodynamically like typical nucleosomes; thus they are relevant reporters of nucleosome behavior. Nucleosomes and free DNA are readily distinguishable at the single-molecule level. Thus, these labeled nucleosomes are well suited to studies of dynamic changes in nucleosome structure including single-molecule dynamics.

DNA Probes↗

Nucleosome organization on Kluyveromyces lactis centromeric DNAs.

The preferential assembly of specialized nucleosomes on budding yeast centromeres can be due either to the higher stability of specialized centromeric nucleosomes and/or to the lower stability of canonical centromeric nucleosomes with respect to bulk nucleosomes. We have evaluated the thermodynamic stability of canonical nucleosomes, assembled on Kluyveromyces lactis centromeric DNAs, with a competitive reconstitution assay and a theoretical method recently developed by us. The results, obtained by both methods, show that all five known centromeric DNAs from K. lactis are able to organize canonical nucleosomes, characterized by higher stability with respect those of bulk DNA. With 'footprinting' and theoretical prediction, based on sequence-dependent DNA elasticity, we have found that centromeric canonical nucleosomes are characterized by nucleosome dyad axis multiple positioning, rotationally phased. The isoenergetic nucleosome multiple positions are relevant in understanding the transition from canonical to specialized nucleosomes in interacting with centromere protein complexes. The satisfactory agreement between the results obtained from theoretical and experimental methods shows that sequence-dependent centromeric DNA elasticity has a main role in nucleosome thermodynamic stability and positioning.

Centromere↗

High resolution microanalysis and three-dimensional nucleosome structure associated with transcribing chromatin.

The nucleosome is the ubiquitous and fundamental DNA-protein complex of the eukaryotic chromosome, participating in the packaging of DNA and in the regulation of gene expression. Biophysical studies have implicated changes in nucleosome structure from chromatin that is quiescent to active in transcription. Since DNA within the nucleosome contains a high concentration of phosphorus whereas histone proteins do not, the nucleosome structure is amenable to microanalytical electron energy loss mapping of phosphorus to delineate the DNA within the protein-nucleic acid particle. Nucleosomes associated with transcriptionally active genes were separated from nucleosomes associated with quiescent genes using mercury-affinity chromatography. The three-dimensional image reconstruction methods for the total nucleosome structure and for the 3D DNA-phosphorus distribution combined quaternion-assisted angular reconstitution of sets of single particles at random orientations and electron spectroscopic imaging. The structure of the active nucleosome has the conformation of an open clam-shell, C- or U-shaped in one view, elongated in another, and exhibits a protein asymmetry. A three-dimensional phosphorus map reveals a conformational change in nucleosomal DNA compared to DNA in the canonical nucleosome structure. It indicates an altered superhelicity and is consistent with unfolding of the particle. The results address conformational changes of the nucleosome and provide a direct structural linkage to biochemical and physiological changes which parallel gene expression.

Chromatin↗

Nucleosomal arrays can be salt-reconstituted on a single-copy MMTV promoter DNA template: their properties differ in several ways from those of comparable 5S concatameric arrays.

Subsaturated nucleosomal arrays were reconstituted on a single-copy MMTV promoter DNA fragment by salt dialysis procedures and studied by atomic force microscopy. Up to an occupation level of approximately eight nucleosomes on this 1900 bp template, salt reconstitution produces nucleosomal arrays which look very similar to comparably loaded 5S rDNA nucleosomal arrays; i.e., nucleosomes are dispersed on the DNA template. Thus, at these occupation levels, the single-copy MMTV template forms arrays suitable for biophysical analyses. A quantitative comparison of the population features of subsaturated MMTV and 5S arrays detects differences between the two: a requirement for higher histone levels to achieve a given level of nucleosome occupation on MMTV templates, indicating that nucleosome loading is thermodynamically less favorable on this template; a preference for pairwise nucleosome occupation of the MMTV (but not the 5S) template at midrange occupation levels; and an enhanced salt stability for nucleosomes on MMTV versus 5S arrays, particularly in the midrange of array occupation. When average occupation levels exceed approximately eight nucleosomes per template, MMTV arrays show a significant level of mainly intramolecular compaction; 5S arrays do not. Taken together, these results show clearly that the nature of the underlying DNA template can affect the physical properties of nucleosomal arrays. DNA sequence-directed differences in the physical properties of chromatin may have important consequences for functional processes such as gene regulation.

DNA↗

A genomic code for nucleosome positioning.

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into nucleosome particles that occlude the DNA from interacting with most DNA binding proteins. Nucleosomes have higher affinity for particular DNA sequences, reflecting the ability of the sequence to bend sharply, as required by the nucleosome structure. However, it is not known whether these sequence preferences have a significant influence on nucleosome position in vivo, and thus regulate the access of other proteins to DNA. Here we isolated nucleosome-bound sequences at high resolution from yeast and used these sequences in a new computational approach to construct and validate experimentally a nucleosome-DNA interaction model, and to predict the genome-wide organization of nucleosomes. Our results demonstrate that genomes encode an intrinsic nucleosome organization and that this intrinsic organization can explain approximately 50% of the in vivo nucleosome positions. This nucleosome positioning code may facilitate specific chromosome functions including transcription factor binding, transcription initiation, and even remodelling of the nucleosomes themselves.

Base Sequence↗

Nucleosome structure and repair of N-methylpurines in the GAL1-10 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Nucleosome structure and repair of N-methylpurines were analyzed at nucleotide resolution in the divergent GAL1-10 genes of intact yeast cells, encompassing their common upstream-activating sequence. In glucose cultures where genes are repressed, nucleosomes with fixed positions exist in regions adjacent to the upstream-activating sequence, and the variability of nucleosome positioning sharply increases with increasing distance from this sequence. Galactose induction causes nucleosome disruption throughout the region analyzed, with those nucleosomes close to the upstream-activating sequence being most striking. In glucose cultures, a strong correlation between N-methylpurine repair and nucleosome positioning was seen in nucleosomes with fixed positions, where slow and fast repair occurred in nucleosome core and linker DNA, respectively. Galactose induction enhanced N-methylpurine repair in both strands of nucleosome core DNA, being most dramatic in the clearly disrupted, fixed nucleosomes. Furthermore, N-methylpurines are repaired primarily by the Mag1-initiated base excision repair pathway, and nucleotide excision repair contributes little to repair of these lesions. Finally, N-methylpurine repair is significantly affected by nearest-neighbor nucleotides, where fast and slow repair occurred in sites between pyrimidines and purines, respectively. These results indicate that nucleosome positioning and DNA sequence significantly modulate Mag1-initiated base excision repair in intact yeast cells.

Animals↗

Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin.

We describe the results of a systematic study, using electron microscopy, of the effects of ionic strength on the morphology of chromatin and of H1-depleted chromatin. With increasing ionic strength, chromatin folds up progressively from a filament of nucleosomes at approximately 1 mM monovalent salt through some intermediate higher-order helical structures (Thoma, F., and T. Koller, 1977, Cell 12:101-107) with a fairly constant pitch but increasing numbers of nucleosomes per turn, until finally at 60 mM (or else in approximately 0.3 mM Mg++) a thick fiber of 250 A diameter is formed, corresponding to a structurally well-organized but not perfectly regular superhelix or solenoid of pitch approximately 110 A as described by Finch and Klug (1976, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73:1897-1901). The numbers of nucleosomes per turn of the helical structures agree well with those which can be calculated from the light-scattering data of Campbell et al. (1978, Nucleic Acids Res. 5:1571-1580). H1-depleted chromatin also condenses with increasing ionic strength but not so densely as chromatin and not into a definite structure with a well-defined fiber direction. At very low ionic strengths, nucleosomes are present in chromatin but not in H1-depleted chromatin which has the form of an unravelled filament. At somewhat higher ionic strengths (greater than 5 mM triethanolamine chloride), nucleosomes are visible in both types of specimen but the fine details are different. In chromatin containing H1, the DNA enters and leaves the nucleosome on the same side but in chromatin depleted of H1 the entrance and exit points are much more random and more or less on opposite sides of the nucleosome. We conclude that H1 stabilizes the nucleosome and is located in the region of the exit and entry points of the DNA. This result is correlated with biochemical and x-ray crystallographic results on the internal structure of the nucleosome core to give a picture of a nucleosome in which H1 is bound to the unique region on a complete two-turn, 166 base pair particle (Fig. 15). In the formation of higher-order structures, these regions on neighboring nucleosomes come closer together so that an H1 polymer may be formed in the center of the superhelical structures.

Chromatin↗

Catalytic activity of the yeast SWI/SNF complex on reconstituted nucleosome arrays.

A novel, quantitative nucleosome array assay has been developed that couples the activity of a nucleosome 'remodeling' activity to restriction endonuclease activity. This assay has been used to determine the kinetic parameters of ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Our results support a catalytic mode of action for SWI/SNF in the absence of nucleosome targeting. In this quantitative assay SWI/SNF and ATP lead to a 100-fold increase in nucleosomal DNA accessibility, and initial rate measurements indicate that the complex can remodel one nucleosome every 4.5 min on an 11mer nucleosome array. In contrast to SWI/SNF action on mononucleosomes, we find that the SWI/SNF remodeling reaction on a nucleosome array is a highly reversible process. This result suggests that recovery from SWI/SNF action involves interactions among nucleosomes. The biophysical properties of model nucleosome arrays, coupled with the ease with which homogeneous arrays can be reconstituted and the DNA accessibility analyzed, makes the described array system generally applicable for functional analysis of other nucleosome remodeling enzymes, including histone acetyltransferases.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Evidence that nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter adopt specific translational positions.

We have previously demonstrated that an array of six nucleosomes are phased on the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat (1,2). In this study, we devised a new assay to measure the translational positions of specific nucleosomes on the MMTV promoter. Nucleosome core particles were purified and shown to contain A and B nucleosomal DNA by Taq polymerase primer extension with nucleosome-specific primers. The 5' and 3' boundaries of A and B nucleosomes were measured by extending to the end of the core DNA with internal primers. This approach yielded results consistent with major translational positions of -23 to +123 and -221 to -75 for A and B nucleosomes, respectively. The micrococcal nuclease cleavage patterns of A and B nucleosome regions in isolated nuclei are conserved at base-pair resolution in multiple murine cell lines containing either stable MMTV-reporter chimeras or endogenous proviruses. As the refined nucleosome positions place important transcription factor binding sites at the 3' edge of the B nucleosome and in the nucleosome A/B linker, we propose that linker histone depletion and chromatin unfolding may be required to expose these cis-elements during steroid hormone-induced transcription initiation.

Animals↗

Use of RNA polymerase as an enzymatic probe of nucleosomal structure.

Nucleosomes prepared from human placental nuclei and Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (nucleoside triphosphate: RNA nucleotidyl transferase EC.2.7.7.6) form stable initiation complexes. This property is utilized as a probe of nucleosome structure. RNA polymerase initiation has been studied on purified nucleosomes, nucleosome cores, and nucleosomal DNA. The affinity of E. coli RNA polymerase for both nucleosome cores and monomers was 5-6 fold less than found for nucleosomal DNA. No difference in apparent initiation Km was found between cores and mononucleosomes. This suggests that initiation does not preferentially occur on the DNA tails of nucleosomes. Once initiated and allowed to form nascent RNA, these complexes are very stable to ionic strength changes. Under conditions in which free enzyme is inactivated with rifampicin, the enzyme in the complex retains activity as demonstrated by its ability to transcribe and reinitiate on both nucleosomes and free DNA. These complexes can be well resolved from free nucleosomes on preparative polyacrylamide gels and both can be eluted from gels for analysis of proteins and DNA sequence complexity. Studies using (125I) labelled nucleosomes show that histones are retained in the initiation complex, and are not dissociated by the enzyme during initiation.

Cell Nucleus↗

Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.

To investigate mechanisms by which multiple transcription factors access complex promoters and enhancers within cellular chromatin, we have analyzed the binding of disparate factors to nucleosome cores. We used a purified in vitro system to analyze binding of four activator proteins, two GAL4 derivatives, USF, and NF-kappa B (KBF1), to reconstituted nucleosome cores containing different combinations of binding sites. Here we show that binding of any two or all three of these factors to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Thus, the binuclear Zn clusters of GAL4, the helix-loop-helix/basic domains of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappa B all participated in cooperative nucleosome binding, illustrating that this effect is not restricted to a particular DNA-binding domain. Simultaneous binding by two factors increased the affinity of individual factors for nucleosomal DNA by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, cooperative binding resulted in efficient nucleosome binding by factors (USF and NF-kappa B) which independently possess little nucleosome-binding ability. The participation of GAL4 derivatives in cooperative nucleosome binding required only DNA-binding and dimerization domains, indicating that disruption of histone-DNA contacts by factor binding was responsible for the increased affinity of additional factors. Cooperative nucleosome binding required sequence-specific binding of all transcription factors, appeared to have spatial constraints, and was independent of the orientation of the binding sites on the nucleosome. These results indicate that cooperative nucleosome binding is a general mechanism that may play a significant role in loading complex enhancer and promoter elements with multiple diverse factors in chromatin and contribute to the generation of threshold responses and transcriptional synergy by multiple activator sites in vivo.

Base Sequence↗

SWI-SNF-mediated nucleosome remodeling: role of histone octamer mobility in the persistence of the remodeled state.

SWI-SNF is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex that disrupts DNA-histone interactions. Several studies of SWI-SNF activity on mononucleosome substrates have suggested that remodeling leads to novel, accessible nucleosomes which persist in the absence of continuous ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, we have reported that SWI-SNF-dependent remodeling of nucleosomal arrays is rapidly reversed after removal of ATP. One possibility is that these contrasting results are due to the different assays used; alternatively, the lability of the SWI-SNF-remodeled state might be different on mononucleosomes versus nucleosomal arrays. To investigate these possibilities, we use a coupled SWI-SNF remodeling-restriction enzyme assay to directly compare the remodeling of mononucleosome and nucleosomal array substrates. We find that SWI-SNF action causes a mobilization of histone octamers for both the mononucleosome and nucleosomal array substrates, and these changes in nucleosome positioning persist in the absence of continued ATP hydrolysis or SWI-SNF binding. In the case of mononucleosomes, the histone octamers accumulate at the DNA ends even in the presence of continued ATP hydrolysis. On nucleosomal arrays, SWI-SNF and ATP lead to a more dynamic state where nucleosomes appear to be constantly redistributed and restriction enzyme sites throughout the array have increased accessibility. This random positioning of nucleosomes within the array persists after removal of ATP, but inactivation of SWI-SNF is accompanied by an increased occlusion of many restriction enzyme sites. Our results also indicate that remodeling of mononucleosomes or nucleosomal arrays does not lead to an accumulation of novel nucleosomes that maintain an accessible state in the absence of continuous ATP hydrolysis.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Functional role of extranucleosomal DNA and the entry site of the nucleosome in chromatin remodeling by ISW2.

A minimal amount of extranucleosomal DNA was required for nucleosome mobilization by ISW2 as shown by using a photochemical histone mapping approach to analyze nucleosome movement on a set of nucleosomes with varied lengths of extranucleosomal DNA. ISW2 was ineffective in repositioning or mobilizing nucleosomes with <or=20 bp of extranucleosomal DNA. In addition, ISW2 was able to slide nucleosomes to within only 10 to 13 bp of the edge of DNA fragments. The nucleosome mobilization was promoted by extranucleosomal single-stranded DNA with modest strand preference. Gaps (10 bp) just inside the nucleosome and in the extranucleosomal DNA showed that the transfer of torsional strain (twist) into the nucleosomal DNA region was not required for mobilizing nucleosomes. However, indications are that the extranucleosomal DNA immediately adjacent to the nucleosome has an important role in the initial stage of nucleosome movement by ISW2.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Cell cycle-specified fluctuation of nucleosome occupancy at gene promoters.

The packaging of DNA into nucleosomes influences the accessibility of underlying regulatory information. Nucleosome occupancy and positioning are best characterized in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, albeit in asynchronous cell populations or on individual promoters such as PHO5 and GAL1-10. Using FAIRE (formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements) and whole-genome microarrays, we examined changes in nucleosome occupancy throughout the mitotic cell cycle in synchronized populations of S. cerevisiae. Perhaps surprisingly, nucleosome occupancy did not exhibit large, global variation between cell cycle phases. However, nucleosome occupancy at the promoters of cell cycle-regulated genes was reduced specifically at the cell cycle phase in which that gene exhibited peak expression, with the notable exception of S-phase genes. We present data that establish FAIRE as a high-throughput method for assaying nucleosome occupancy. For the first time in any system, nucleosome occupancy was mapped genome-wide throughout the cell cycle. Fluctuation of nucleosome occupancy at promoters of most cell cycle-regulated genes provides independent evidence that periodic expression of these genes is controlled mainly at the level of transcription. The promoters of G2/M genes are distinguished from other cell cycle promoters by an unusually low baseline nucleosome occupancy throughout the cell cycle. This observation, coupled with the maintenance throughout the cell cycle of the stereotypic nucleosome occupancy states between coding and non-coding loci, suggests that the largest component of variation in nucleosome occupancy is "hard wired," perhaps at the level of DNA sequence.

Cell Adhesion Molecules↗