Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Nelfinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Long-term responses to treatment including ritonavir or nelfinavir in HIV-1-infected children. Pediatric AIDS Group of Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge concerning the long-term antiretroviral and immunological efficacy of protease inhibitors in children is limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open-label, prospective, multicenter clinical trial was conducted over a period of 72 weeks in Switzerland. 60 HIV-1 infected children (aged 0.3-16.9 years) naive to protease inhibitors were enrolled. Ritonavir or nelfinavir and at least one new nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor were introduced into the current treatment regimen. HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts were monitored after introducing the protease inhibitor, and the tolerability and safety of the drugs were assessed. RESULTS: Dictated by chronological availability, 37 children received ritonavir and 23 nelfinavir. At baseline, children given ritonavir had higher mean plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (5.03 vs 4.63 log10 copies/ml; p = 0.001) and lower mean CD4 cell counts (277 vs 555 cells/microl; p = 0.009) than children given nelfinavir. Antiretroviral treatment (ART) naive children showed higher mean plasma HIV-1 RNA levels than non-naive (5.18 vs 4.64 log10 copies/ml; p = 0.02). The decline in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels 72 weeks after treatment with ritonavir and nelfinavir was -2.17 and -1.30 log10 copies/ml, respectively (p = 0.006) and in ART-naive vs non-naive patients -2.70 vs -1.39 log10 copies/ml (p < or = 0.01). 69% of ART-naive patients and 32% of non-naive patients achieved sustained plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 400 copies/ml. Increases in CD4 cells were higher in ART-naive compared to non-naive patients (p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The antiretroviral and immunologic benefits of protease inhibitors are more profound in ART-naive than in non-naive children.

Adolescent↗

C/EBPalpha reverses the anti-adipogenic effects of the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir.

Nelfinavir and other HIV protease inhibitors effectively suppress morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. However, therapeutic use of HIV protease inhibitors has been temporally associated with the development of a lipodystrophy/insulin resistance syndrome and some evidence suggests that HIV protease inhibitors may be the causative agent. We report here that nelfinavir promotes loss of cytoplasmic triglyceride from fully differentiated adipocytes and inhibits preadipocyte differentiation at biologically relevant concentrations. Forced expression of the adipogenic transcription factor C/EBPalpha rescues some of the anti-adipogenic effects of nelfinavir. These results suggest that nelfinavir may mediate an anti-adipogenic effect by antagonizing expression of C/EBPalpha.

3T3-L1 Cells↗

Determination of nelfinavir mesylate as bulk drug and in pharmaceutical dosage form by stability indicating HPLC.

A isocratic, selective, accurate and stability indicating HPLC method of analysis of nelfinavir mesylate both as a bulk drug and in formulations was developed and validated. A CN chromatographic column (250 mmx4.6 mm, 5 microm) was used for the separation at 40 degrees C. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile (MeCN) and 25 mM monobasic ammonium phosphate (containing 25 mM triethylamine, pH 3.4 with phosphate acid) (40:60, v/v) was delivered at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with detection at 210 nm. The developed method was validated in terms of selectivity, linearity, limit of quantitation, precision, accuracy and solution stability. As the proposed LC method achieved satisfactory resolution between nelfinavir mesylate, its degradation products, intermediate product possibly present in nelfinavir drug substance and other impurities in the end product before refining in the final step of synthetic process, it can be employed as a stability indicating one, used for the synthetic process control and determination of nelfinavir mesylate in pharmaceutical preparations.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

Hepatotoxicity and nelfinavir: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The inclusion of protease inhibitors in 3-drug highly active antiretroviral regimens for treating patients who are infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 has had a significant impact in increasing survival and decreasing morbidity. However, the effectiveness of this class of drugs may be compromised by the occurrence of drug-related hepatotoxicity, which is problematic especially in individuals co-infected with hepatitis viruses. Based on its clinical and pharmacologic profile, especially its unique pattern of resistance, nelfinavir has been used frequently as a first-line protease-inhibitor therapy for human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients. The aim of this study was to identify the relative potential for developing hepatotoxicity for nelfinavir vs other protease inhibitors. METHODS: An exploratory meta-analysis of liver enzyme level increases was conducted in a combined total of 4268 patients derived from 3 large recently conducted prospective and retrospective clinical trials and a prospective cohort study. RESULTS: The results indicate that among 4 commercially available protease inhibitors and a 2-protease inhibitor combination, nelfinavir and indinavir are associated with the lowest rates of occurrence of severe hepatotoxicity (ie, combined estimates of liver enzyme level increases of 2.9% and 3.1%, respectively). The low rate of occurrence of severe hepatotoxicity for nelfinavir was shown even among patients co-infected with hepatitis viruses. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, these data provide support for the conclusion that differences in the potential for hepatotoxicity do exist among the commercially available protease inhibitors.

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury↗

Combination therapy with efavirenz, nelfinavir, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 382 Team.

BACKGROUND: Consistent long-term viral suppression has been difficult to achieve in children with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. We tested the safety and antiviral efficacy of a novel combination consisting of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and one or more nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in 57 children previously treated with only nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. METHODS: The children were monitored for 48 weeks after the initiation of therapy. We assessed plasma concentrations of efavirenz and nelfinavir, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, and lymphocyte subpopulations. RESULTS: At base line, the 57 HIV-1-infected children (age range, 3.8 to 16.8 years) had a median of 699 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter and 10,000 copies of HIV-1 RNA per milliliter of plasma. The most common treatment-related effects of at least moderate severity were rash (in 30 percent of children), diarrhea (in 18 percent), neutropenia (in 12 percent), and biochemical abnormalities (in 12 percent). Serious side effects were uncommon. The mean values for the area under the curve for efavirenz and nelfinavir corresponded to expected values. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 76 percent of children had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of less than 400 copies per milliliter after 48 weeks of therapy and 63 percent had levels of less than 50 copies per milliliter. A high plasma HIV-1 RNA level at base line significantly decreased the likelihood that plasma levels of HIV-1 RNA would become undetectable during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-1-infected children who were previously treated with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, the combination of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors was generally well tolerated and had a potent and sustained antiviral effect.

Adolescent↗

Drug interactions between opioids and antiretroviral medications: interaction between methadone, LAAM, and nelfinavir.

Understanding drug interactions between antiretrovirals and opiate therapies may decrease toxicities and enhance adherence, with improved HIV outcomes in injection drug users. We report results of a clinical pharmacology study designed to examine the interaction of the protease inhibitor, nelfinavir, with methadone and LAAM (N = 48). Nelfinavir decreased methadone exposure, but no withdrawal was observed over the five day study period. LAAM and dinorLAAM concentrations were decreased, while norLAAM concentrations were increased, with minimal overall change in LAAM/metabolite exposure. Methadone and LAAM did not affect nelfinavir concentrations, but methadone decreased M8 metabolite exposure. While no toxicities were observed, clinicians should be aware of the potential for drug interactions when patients require treatment with nelfinavir and these opiate medications.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Incidence of resistance in a double-blind study comparing lopinavir/ritonavir plus stavudine and lamivudine to nelfinavir plus stavudine and lamivudine.

Study M98-863 was a double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study that compared lopinavir/ritonavir with nelfinavir, each coadministered with stavudine and lamivudine, in 653 antiretroviral therapy-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected subjects. The incidence of HIV drug resistance was analyzed using baseline and rebound virus isolates from subjects with plasma HIV RNA >400 copies/mL from weeks 24 to 108 of therapy. No evidence of genotypic or phenotypic resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir, defined as any active site or primary mutation in HIV protease, was detected in virus isolates from 51 lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects with available genotypes. Primary mutations related to nelfinavir resistance (D30N and/or L90M) were observed in 43 (45%) of 96 nelfinavir-treated subjects. Resistance to lamivudine and stavudine was also significantly higher in nelfinavir-treated versus lopinavir/ritonavir-treated subjects. These differences suggest substantially different genetic and pharmacological barriers to resistance for these 2 protease inhibitors and may have implications for strategies for initiating antiretroviral therapy.

Double-Blind Method↗

Emergence of drug resistance mutations in a group of HIV-infected children taking nelfinavir-containing regimens.

HIV-1-infected children are often treated with therapy regimens including protease inhibitors (PIs). We monitored the virologic response in a small group of pediatric patients undergoing therapy with regimens including the PI nelfinavir and determined whether new drug resistance mutations were present immediately after virologic failure. Seventeen reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI)-experienced children starting nelfinavir-containing therapy regimens were studied. After virologic failure, HIV-1 protease (PR) and RT sequences were examined for drug resistance mutations. Viral load levels decreased to <400 HIV RNA copies/ml in six patients and remained at <400 HIV RNA copies/ml in four patients. Three patients did not respond virologically; all three had mutations specific for one or more of their regimen drugs either before or soon after nelfinavir initiation. The virologic response was transient in eight patients whose viral loads did not decrease to <400 HIV RNA copies/ml. Genotypic data from seven of the eight patients revealed mutations specific for one or more of their regimen drugs after virologic rebound. PI resistance mutations occurred in eight patients: D30N in six, and L90M in three. In three patients, the only new mutation after failure was the RT mutation M184V. Despite virologic failure, sustained increases in CD4+ lymphocyte counts were noted in eight patients. We conclude that in this small group of pediatric patients, virologic failure occurred in all patients whose viral loads did not become undetectable after the switch to a nelfinavir-containing regimen. After failure, new drug resistance mutations were found in either PR or RT. Studies of larger cohorts are warranted to determine whether HIV-1 genotypic data can help in the formulation of effective salvage therapies in children.

CD4 Lymphocyte Count↗

Incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens among HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens among human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients with known stage of liver fibrosis. METHODS: All HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were monitored for a period of 12 months after starting nelfinavir-containing regimens and, with an available liver biopsy, were included in a retrospective study. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included in the study. Nine (10.9%) HIV/HCV-coinfected patients showed an episode of severe hepatotoxicity during the study period. Eight (9.8%) individuals showed grade 3 or 4 change in levels of serum alanine aminotransferase and one subject presented with an event of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Six (18.2%) of 33 patients with advanced liver fibrosis and three (6%) of 49 individuals without advanced liver fibrosis showed an episode of severe hepatotoxicity (P = 0.1). In the multivariate analysis, only nevirapine use during nelfinavir therapy [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 8.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-54.1; P = 0.01] was independently associated with risk of development of severe liver toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of severe hepatotoxicity of nelfinavir-containing regimens is low among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with known stage of liver fibrosis. In addition, our findings show that concomitant nevirapine use is associated with an increased risk of severe hepatotoxicity in these subjects. Likewise, the proportion of severe liver toxicity tended to be higher in individuals with advanced liver fibrosis.

Adult↗

Plasma drug levels, genotypic resistance, and virological response to a nelfinavir plus saquinavir-containing regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the importance of resistance and drug levels in the response to a dual-protease inhibitor (PI) combination. METHODS: Prospective study of 62 HIV-positive patients who switched to a salvage regimen including nelfinavir plus saquinavir. Virological response was defined as a decrease in viraemia > 0.5 log10 after 24 weeks. Optimal PI levels were defined as those above the protein binding-corrected 95% inhibitory concentration (IC95), as estimated in the presence of 50% human serum. RESULTS: Baseline median HIV load was 4.78 log10 copies/ml. The median number of mutations in the protease gene was nine (range, 2-25), predominantly at residues 82 (52%), and 90 (40%). After 24 weeks, 45% of patients had responded and 19% were < 50 copies/ml. A higher number of mutations in the protease gene (12 versus 8;P = 0.001), and the L90M mutation (36% versus 67%; P = 0.001) were associated with treatment failure. Trough levels of nelfinavir and saquinavir were two- and fivefold, respectively, greater than those reached when used as the only PI (2480 and 260 ng/ml, respectively), and they were above the estimated protein-corrected IC95 in 96% and 32% of cases. Thus, the Cmin : IC95 ratio ranged from 0.1 to 10 for nelfinavir and from 0.12 to 3.24 for saquinavir. Suboptimal PI levels were associated with a poorer response, but there was no correlation between optimal drug levels and a better response. CONCLUSION: Genotypic resistance predicts the virological response to a nelfinavir-saquinavir salvage regimen. Our data suggest that higher than optimal drug levels could be necessary to control the replication of many PI-resistant viruses.

Adult↗

Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and indinavir in HIV-1-infected pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Protease inhibitor (PI)-based combination antiretroviral therapy is often indicated for treatment of maternal HIV disease, but little is known about PI pharmacokinetics during pregnancy. Increased cytochrome P450 activity may affect the disposition of PI and decrease drug exposure. METHODS: Steady-state PI pharmacokinetics, measured by the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC(tau)), were evaluated in women on stable antiretroviral regimens containing nelfinavir (n = 9) or indinavir (n = 4) with or without ritonavir (n = 2) during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and postpartum. Cytochrome P450 activity was assessed by measuring the urine 6 beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol ratio (6 beta-OHF/F). RESULTS: AUC(tau) in women on indinavir alone decreased and 6 beta-OHF/F ratios increased during pregnancy compared with postpartum control values (n = 2). Nelfinavir results demonstrated no clear change and were highly variable. CONCLUSIONS: The results for indinavir suggest that metabolic induction occurs during pregnancy, which apparently resolves spontaneously postpartum. This may warrant dosage adjustment during pregnancy. This induction is offset by concomitant use of ritonavir. Nelfinavir results were variable and, therefore, the impact of pregnancy on nelfinavir disposition was not fully determined.

Adult↗

Influence of ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCG2 haplotypes on the cellular exposure of nelfinavir in vivo.

OBJECTIVES: The human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor nelfinavir is substrate of polyspecific drug transporters encoded by ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein), ABCC1 (MRP1) and ABCC2 (MRP2), and an inhibitor of BCRP, encoded by ABCG2. Genetic polymorphism in these genes may be associated with changes in transport function. METHODS: A comprehensive evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (39 SNPs in ABCB1, 7 in ABCC1, 27 in ABCC2, and 16 in ABCG2), and inferred haplotypes was done to assess possible associations of genetic variants with cellular exposure of nelfinavir in vivo. Analysis used peripheral mononuclear cells from individuals receiving nelfinavir (n=28). Key results were re-examined in a larger sample size (n=129) contributing data on plasma drug levels. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant association between cellular nelfinavir area under the curve (AUC) and SNPs or haplotypes at ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCG2. There was an association with cellular exposure for two loci in strong linkage disequilibrium: ABCB1 3435C>T; AUCTT>AUCCT>AUCCC (ratio 2.1, 1.4, 1, Ptrend=0.01), and intron 26 +80T>C; AUCCC> AUCCT > AUCTT (ratio 2.4, 1.3, 1, Ptrend=0.006). Haplotypic analysis using tagging SNPs did not improve the single SNP association values.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

Dependence of nelfinavir brain uptake on dose and tissue concentrations of the selective P-glycoprotein inhibitor zosuquidar in rats.

Most reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors used in highly active antiretroviral therapy for treating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections exhibit poor penetration into the brain, raising the concern that the brain may be a sanctuary site for the development of resistant HIV variants. This study explores the relationship between the dose and plasma and brain concentrations of zosuquidar and the effect of this selective P-glycoprotein inhibitor on central nervous system penetration of the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir maintained at steady state by intravenous infusions in rats. Nelfinavir was infused (10 mg/kg/h) for up to 10 h with or without concurrent administration of an intravenous bolus dose of 2, 6, or 20 mg/kg zosuquidar given at 4 h. Brain tissue and plasma were analyzed for both drug concentrations. Brain tissue/plasma nelfinavir concentration ratios (uncorrected for the vascular contribution) increased nonlinearly with zosuquidar dose from 0.06 +/- 0.03 in the absence of zosuquidar and 0.09 +/- 0.02 between 2 and 6 h after 2 mg/kg zosuquidar to 0.85 +/- 0.19 after 6 mg/kg and 1.58 +/- 0.67 after 20 mg/kg zosuquidar. Zosuquidar brain tissue/plasma concentration ratios exhibited a similar abrupt increase from 2.8 +/- 0.3 after a 2 mg/kg dose to approximately 15 after the 6 and 20 mg/kg doses. The apparent threshold in the plasma concentration of zosuquidar necessary to produce significant enhancement in brain uptake of nelfinavir appears to be close to the plasma concentrations associated with the maximum tolerated dose reported in the literature after repeated dosing of zosuquidar in patients.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

A population pharmacokinetic analysis of nelfinavir mesylate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients enrolled in a phase III clinical trial.

A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on nelfinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were enrolled in a phase III clinical trial. The data consisted of 509 plasma concentrations from 174 patients who received nelfinavir at a dose of 500 or 750 mg three times a day. The analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling as implemented in NONMEM (version 4.0; double precision). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data. The timing and small number of early postdose blood levels did not allow accurate estimation of volume of distribution (V/F) and the absorption rate constant (k(a)). As a result, two models were used to analyze the data: model 1, in which oral clearance (CL/F), V/F, and k(a) were estimated, and model 2, in which V/F and k(a) were fixed to known values and only CL/F was estimated. Estimates of CL/F ranged from 41. 9 to 45.1 liters/h, values in close agreement with previous studies. Neither body weight, age, sex, race, dose level, baseline viral load, metabolite-to-parent drug plasma concentration ratio, history of liver disease, nor elevated results of liver function tests appeared to be significant covariates for clearance. The only significant covariate-parameter relationship was concomitant use of fluconazole on CL/F, which was associated with a modest reduction in interindividual variability of CL/F. Patients who received concomitant therapy with fluconazole had a statistically significant reduction in nelfinavir CL/F of 26 to 30%. Since serious dose-limiting toxicity and concentration-related toxicities are not apparent for nelfinavir, this effect of fluconazole is unlikely to be of clinical significance.

Adult↗

Potential for interactions between caspofungin and nelfinavir or rifampin.

The potential for interactions between caspofungin and nelfinavir or rifampin was evaluated in two parallel-panel studies. In study A, healthy subjects received a 14-day course of caspofungin alone (50 mg administered intravenously [IV] once daily) (n = 10) or with nelfinavir (1,250 mg administered orally twice daily) (n = 9) or rifampin (600 mg administered orally once daily) (n = 10). In study B, 14 subjects received a 28-day course of rifampin (600 mg administered orally once daily), with caspofungin (50 mg administered IV once daily) coadministered on the last 14 days, and 12 subjects received a 14-day course of caspofungin alone (50 mg administered IV once daily). The coadministration/administration alone geometric mean ratio for the caspofungin area under the time-concentration profile calculated for the 24-h period following dosing [AUC(0-24)] was as follows (values in parentheses are 90% confidence intervals [CIs]): 1.08 (0.93-1.26) for nelfinavir, 1.12 (0.97-1.30) for rifampin (study A), and 1.01 (0.91-1.11) for rifampin (study B). The shape of the caspofungin plasma profile was altered by rifampin, resulting in a 14 to 31% reduction in the trough concentration at 24 h after dosing (C(24h)), consistent with a net induction effect at steady state. Both the AUC and the C(24h) were elevated in the initial days of rifampin coadministration in study A (61 and 170% elevations, respectively, on day 1) but not in study B, consistent with transient net inhibition prior to full induction. The coadministration/administration alone geometric mean ratio for the rifampin AUC(0-24) on day 14 was 1.07 (90% CI, 0.83-1.38). Nelfinavir does not meaningfully alter caspofungin pharmacokinetics. Rifampin both inhibits and induces caspofungin disposition, resulting in a reduced C(24h) at steady state. An increase in the caspofungin dose to 70 mg, administered daily, should be considered when the drug is coadministered with rifampin.

Adult↗

Mutation D30N is not preferentially selected by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C in the development of resistance to nelfinavir.

Differences in baseline polymorphisms between subtypes may result in development of diverse mutational pathways during antiretroviral treatment. We compared drug resistance in patients with human immunodeficiency virus subtype C (referred to herein as "subtype-C-infected patients") versus subtype-B-infected patients following protease inhibitor (PI) therapy. Genotype, phenotype, and replication capacity (Phenosense; Virologic) were determined. We evaluated 159 subtype-C- and 65 subtype-B-infected patients failing first PI treatment. Following nelfinavir treatment, the unique nelfinavir mutation D30N was substantially less frequent in C (7%) than in B (23%; P = 0.03) while L90M was similar (P < 0.5). Significant differences were found in the rates of M36I (98 and 36%), L63P (35 and 59%), A71V (3 and 32%), V77I (0 and 36%), and I93L (91 and 32%) (0.0001 < P < 0.05) in C and B, respectively. Other mutations were L10I/V, K20R, M46I, V82A/I, I84V, N88D, and N88S. Subtype C samples with mutation D30N showed a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) change in susceptibility to nelfinavir only. Other mutations increased IC(50) correlates to all PIs. Following accumulation of mutations, replication capacity of the C virus was reduced from 43% +/- 22% to 22% +/- 15% (P = 0.04). We confirmed the selective nature of the D30N mutation in C, and the broader cross-resistance of other common protease inhibitor mutations. The rates at which these mutational pathways develop differ in C and subtype-B-infected patients failing therapy, possibly due to the differential impact of baseline polymorphisms. Because mutation D30N is not preferentially selected in nelfinavir-treated subtype-C-infected patients, as it is in those infected with subtype B, the consideration of using this drug initially to preserve future protease inhibitor options is less relevant for subtype-C-infected patients.

Cohort Studies↗

Lack of pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and nelfinavir mesylate.

A study explored the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir (300 mg administered once daily) and nelfinavir (1,250 mg twice daily) when coadministered in 29 healthy volunteers. Tenofovir, nelfinavir, and M8 pharmacokinetics was unaltered when tenofovir and nelfinavir were coadministered, and tenofovir administration did not affect the M8/nelfinavir area under the concentration-versus-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC(tau)) ratio. No interaction between tenofovir and nelfinavir was observed.

Adenine↗

Prevalence and virologic consequences of HIV-1 genotype mutations detected in a cohort of 161 Italian patients receiving a nelfinavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy.

A cross-sectional study was carried out in our tertiary care hospital between January 1998 and December 2001. All 161 consecutive patients naive to nelfinavir and who had received a nelfinavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of at least 24-week duration were extrapolated from the 802 adult HIV-infected subjects treated with antiretroviral therapy. All cases of virologic failure were considered and viral genotyped. Virologic failure occurred in 80 out of 161 nelfinavir-treated patients, all belonging to the experienced group. On the whole, only 11 patients (7%) developed the D30N substitution, whose 6 was in association with the N88D mutation. Among the 80 failed patients, the M184V mutation was detected in 52 (65%), while only 7 patients showed simultaneously the M184V, T215Y and K103N substitutions. In our HIV-infected population receiving a nelfinavir-based HAART, the D30N mutation has shown a low absolute frequency, while the detection of M184V substitution and the simultaneous occurrence of M184V, T215Y and K103N mutations were related to a more favorable virological response.

Adult↗