Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “MYOGLOBIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Evaluation of myoglobin function in the presence of axial diffusion.

Facilitation of oxygen transport by myoglobin has been assessed by many researchers. Yet, the models used in these studies often assume that radial diffusion is the primary transport mechanism in tissue. Axial diffusion is typically neglected. In this study, oxygen transport by myoglobin facilitation is added to a proven cardiac tissue model which contains axial diffusion in the tissue and capillary regions, the Radially-Averaged, Axially-Distributed (RAAD) model. Previous research has shown that the axial diffusion in the capillary and tissue regions becomes coupled, causing a reduction in the pO2 at the capillary inlet. The objective is to determine if this coupling effect increases the facilitation of oxygen transport by myoglobin. The RAAD model consists of non-interacting cylinders of tissue (Krogh cylinders), with each perfused by a central capillary. Derivation of the equations describing the RAAD model yields a stiff, fourth-order, non-linear, ODE, BVP. The equation set is solved numerically. Parameters for myoglobin concentration and diffusion coefficient are chosen to maximize myoglobin facilitation. The effect of myoglobin is assessed by observing changes in the pO2 profiles for the model with and without myoglobin. Also, the RAAD model is compared to experimental pO2 data to determine if the inclusion of myoglobin improves the model prediction. The computer simulations show that myoglobin does facilitate diffusion, but only to a small extent. The changes in the capillary pO2 profiles for the model with and without myoglobin are not significant, pO2 reductions are 0.8% at the inlet and 2% at the outlet. The model prediction is not substantially improved with the addition of myoglobin. The sum of squared error is reduced by 0.1%, from 5.6834 without myoglobin, to 5.6779 with myoglobin. The steady state solution of the RAAD model with myoglobin suggests that, in the presence of axial diffusion, facilitation of oxygen diffusion to tissue is not myoglobin's primary function. No conclusion can be made about the transient function of myoglobin.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Antibody response to myoglobins: effect of host species.

Using both direct and competitive binding studies it is demonstrated that antibodies to beef myoglobin raised in sheep are able to distinguish between beef and sheep myoglobins although these two proteins differ by only six of the 153 amino acid residues. By contrast, antibodies to beef myoglobin raised in rabbits, dogs and chickens bind almost equally well to beef and sheep myoglobins. It is also shown that antibodies to beef myoglobin raised in sheep have a lower avidity for beef myoglobin than do antibodies raised in more distantly related species. Furthermore, only 50% of the specific anti-beef myoglobin antibodies isolated from sheep antisera will bind to sheep myoglobins whereas 100% of the specific antibodies isolated from the antisera of the other immunised species will bind to sheep myoglobin. It is suggested that antibodies to beef myoglobin are raised to those surface regions which are topographically altered as a result of sequence differences from the host's own myoglobin. When the host animal is evolutionarily distant these sequence differences are considerable and antibodies are raised to the entire surface of the molecule. However, when the host's myoglobin is very similar in sequence to beef myoglobin (as is the case when using sheep as the host animal) antibodies are made only to surface regions affected by the sequence differences. Some of these antibodies--those to the regions of greatest difference--will bind weakly if at all to sheep myoglobin, while those directed to areas of lesser difference will bind well to sheep myoglobin.

Adsorption↗