Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Jejunostomy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Feeding jejunostomy for post-operative nutritional support.

Enteral feeding by tube jejunostomy, inserted during definitive surgery, was used in 19 adult patients operated upon in a 24 month period. Jejunostomy feeding was associated with a low rate of minor complications enabling delivery of adequate caloric and protein input shortly after major abdominal operations and up to 9 months later. We feel that the insertion of a regular size jejunostomy tube during surgery is a simple, brief and safe procedure which offers efficient and inexpensive nutritional support, and thus has an important role in the post-operative management of selected patients. It is also easily used in the home setting if needed.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1986

Chronic jejunostomy feeding with a non-elemental formula in undernourished patients with cystic fibrosis.

Ten patients with cystic fibrosis, moderate to severe lung disease (forced expiratory flow % predicted 26.0, 15.7 [SD]), and undernutrition resistant to oral supplementation have been treated for 10 to 36 months with night-time feeds of a non-elemental formula given via a jejunostomy. All patients gained some weight and showed a significant increase in weight for height (change % wt/ht 8.1, 6.0 [SD] and mid-arm muscle circumference (change MAMC % standard 6.2, 5.7 [SD]). Although the forced expiratory flow indicated progression of the small airways disease during the period of feeding, the forced vital capacity did not significantly decline. In nine patients improvement in % wt/ht was maintained. One patient tolerated the feeding poorly and died of severe pulmonary disease after 10 months. The non-elemental formula used cost less than half that of an elemental formula. The jejunostomy tubes were unobtrusive and secured with only a small transparent dressing, which facilitated replacement. No serious complications resulted from jejunostomy feeding.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Prospectively randomized trial using perioperative low dose octreotide to prevent organ related and general complications following pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of low dose perioperative Octreotide on the prevention of complications (pancreatic fistula and general complications) in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery followed by pancreatico-jejunostomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 105 patients were randomized to receive either Octreotide 0.1 mg subcutaneously 3 times/day for a total of 7 days or no Octreotide. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of a pancreatic fistula and/or general complications including the length of hospital stay. There were 25 surgical draining procedures performed and 80 duodeno-pancreatectomies with or without preservation of the pylorus. Twenty-six (24.8%) of the patients were treated for chronic pancreatitis, 8 (7.6%) for benign tumoral disease and 71 (67.6%) for carcinoma. All patients underwent pancreatico-jejunostomy. RESULTS: 56 patients received Octreotide and 49 did not. The incidence of fistula formation in the Octreotide group was 8.9% (n=5) and in the control group 8.2% (n=4) for a total incidence of 8.5%. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. There was one death in the Octreotide group and none in the control group for an overall mortality of 0.9%. The morbidity, except fistulas, was 10.7% in the Octreotide group and 12.2% in the control group. The length of hospital stay was 23.1 +/- 15.1 days in the group receiving Octreotide vs 20.4 +/- 8.1 days in the control group (p = 0.808). Stratifying the data for duodenopancreatectomy and for draining procedures there was no difference between the groups either. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy, the perioperative use of 3 x 0.1 mg Octreotide for 7 days does not reduce general complications nor fistula formation.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗
PubMed1977

Postoperative nutritional support using needle catheter feeding jejunostomy.

Needle catheter jejunostomy was used as an adjunctive surgical procedure in 110 patients. In 19 patients (or 17%) the jejunostomy was of value for the administration of post-operative nutritional support using an elemental diet and it may serve as an alternative route for the administration of supplementing fluids and electrolytes if intestinal function is intact. The clinical experience with the catheter jejunostomy establishes it as a satisfactory technique for postoperative nutritional support in patients requiring esophageal and proximal gastric resection and repair, and gastric surgery in the elderly and debilitated. It is also useful in patients undergoing complicated biliary, pancreatic, and duodenal surgery in whom anastomotic difficulties are anticipated.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Needle-catheter jejunostomy for postoperative nutritional support.

Use of the needle-catheter feeding jejunostomy at Richland Memorial Hospital and the Dorn Veterans Administration Hospital, both clinical teaching institutions of the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, has been evaluated in 114 patients ranging from 20 to 90 years old. The results of this survey span a 36-month period, from Jan 1, 1982 to Jan 1, 1985, in which jejunostomy catheters were inserted via a subserosal approach to provide early postoperative enteral support after elective and emergency surgical procedures. Of the 114 patients who had the catheter inserted, 82 (72%) completed a course of enteral tube feedings without complications, whereas 32 (28%) had either mechanical or metabolic complications leading to temporary or permanent cessation of feeding. One patient had a serious midjejunal volvulus, resulting in extensive jejunal necrosis and subsequent resection, a heretofore unpublished complication of this technique. The median number of days with catheter per patient was 18, with a range of one to 98 days. Only four (3.5%) of the catheters inserted were not used. Nutritional parameters were maintained or improved in all patients reviewed. The results of this study encourage the insertion of a feeding jejunostomy catheter as a complementary surgical procedure in patients expected to have a catabolic postoperative course, and who are therefore in need of aggressive nutritional support.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Massive pneumatosis intestinalis and subcutaneous emphysema: complication of needle catheter jejunostomy.

The safety and efficacy of enteral feeding by needle catheter jejunostomy has prompted its use after many major gastrointestinal operations. Indeed, the technical complications of this procedure are infrequent. This report details the development of massive pneumatosis intestinalis associated with elemental feeding via jejunostomy. The proposed etiology includes excessive gas accumulation within the small intestine secondary to 1) inadequate nasogastric suction, 2) post-traumatic intestinal ileus, and 3) disaccharide fermentation; combined with a mucosal defect created by the catheter jejunostomy. Successful management consists of nasogastric suction and immediate termination of the enteral feeding.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Effects of cimetidine on jejunostomy effluents in patients with severe short-bowel syndrome.

The effect of the H2-receptor blocking agent cimetidine on jejunal effluent was examined in eight short-bowel patients with high-output jejunostomies. Stool mass and faecal excretion of sodium and potassium were significantly reduced by intravenous injection of 400 mg cimetidine four times a day. The amount of calcium, magnesium, phosphate, zinc, and fat in jejunostomy effluent did not change significantly. Cimetidine may be considered an antidiarrhoeal drug in extensively small-bowel-resected patients with a jejunostomy and may reduce the need for parenteral saline supply in these patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

[Temporary jejunostomy].

The different techniques used for temporary jejunostomy are described. They are governed by the presence or absence of utilizable stomach. The advantages and drawbacks of each technique are examined. The simplest and most reliable one is transgastric jejunostomy. Two variants of jejunostomy after total gastrectomy and oesophagectomy are described.

Enteral Nutrition↗
PubMed1983

[Immediate postoperative enteral feeding with an elemental diet (Survimed) using a new application form of the so-called fine needle catheter jejunostomy. A prospective study].

In a prospective study (n = 50) the clinical usefulness of a fine-needle-catheter-jejunostomy based on the method of Delany et al. [1] was studied. In all cases the jejunostomy was inserted intraoperatively without difficulty and without complication. The set used (Intestofix) consisted of one polyurethan-catheter (75 cm length), 2.1 mm inner diameter) and of two hollow needles constructed as split-cannulas. This system has been proved in our study to be simple, rapid and safe. Patient's tolerance of the feeding was, however, unsatisfactory; diarrhea occurred on the 5th postoperative day in 35% of all patients, in addition we observed inconvenient belching (42.5%) and sensation of repletion (25%). There may be different causes for these uncomfortable symptoms; for example application schedule or the composition of food. We think that the operation itself exerts an important influence upon patient's tolerance because patients without operation but under the same conditions tolerate the nutrition via jejunostomy better than those in our study (with concomitant operation).

Catheterization↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Proximal duodeno-jejunostomy for the safe management of the difficult duodenal stump.

Seven patients with peptic ulcer disease had severe scarring of the duodenum, making its closure at the time of gastrectomy difficult. They were managed intraoperatively with proximal duodeno-jejunostomy as a means to avoid the catastrophic complication of disruption of the duodenal stump closure with its consequent peritonitis. The jejunum used for this anastomosis was an extension of the long limb of a Roux en Y which is brought up to perform the gastrojejunostomy. The end to end duodeno-jejunostomy is performed proximal to a side to side gastrojejunostomy, hence the name, proximal duodeno Jejunostomy. These seven patients had no unexpected immediate postoperative complications during the thirty days following surgery and were all discharged from the hospital well. During the same three and a half year period twenty five other patients were submitted to gastrectomy and had two duodenal stump leaks after conventional closures. One patient died and the other survived after prolonged intensive care stay. These differences were not statistically significant. These duodenojejunostomies are non-functional anastomoses and should consequently stricture, but in one patient it remained open and he developed bile reflux gastritis in spite of the Roux en Y gastrojejunostomy constructed to avoid this complication. These anastomoses should be constructed as stenotic as possible.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Use of a feeding jejunostomy after oesophagogastric surgery.

Over a 5-year period, 58 patients with oesophageal or gastric malignancy underwent surgical resection with oesophagogastric or oesophagojejunal anastomosis. All were fed temporarily with a catheter feeding jejunostomy placed at the time of surgery. All patients tolerated the feeding well. There were no catheter-related deaths and only one serious complication, formation of an abscess following catheter dislodgement. Experience with this technique suggests that it is safe and cheap method of feeding patients after oesophagogastric surgery. Such patients are particularly suitable for a feeding jejunostomy as they are frequently malnourished, rarely have prolonged postoperative ileus and may develop complications that delay the onset of oral intake.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Needle catheter jejunostomy at esophagectomy for cancer.

Important physiological changes occur after major abdominal surgery. Cellular and morphological changes follow a period of malnutrition. Enteral feeding is an important strategy for maintaining gut integrity and function. Controversies remain on the use of feeding jejunostomy after major abdominal surgery and its use had not gained widespread acceptance. The records of 262 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer were reviewed retrospectively to assess whether the placement of a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) at the time of surgery is a safe and useful procedure. All the patients had a 9 Fr. NCJ place in a standardized fashion at the time of the esophagectomy. The technique of placement, the utilisation, and the complications of the NCJ were examined. The enteral nutrition was started in the first post-operative day. Sixty-three percent of our patients required enteral nutrition for 10 or more days. In 19%, this requirement was prolonged for more then 20 days, upto 68 days. The complications related to NCJ were four (1.5%). The use of the NCJ as described is safe, with an extremely low rate of complications. It may provide adequate nutritional support for a prolonged period of time at low costs. Its routine use in patients undergoing esophagectomy is recommended.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: also a simple technique.

Placement of feeding tubes is a common procedure for general surgeons. While the advent of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy has changed and improved surgical practice, this technique is contraindicated in many circumstances. In some patients placement of feeding tubes in the stomach may be contraindicated due to the risks of aspiration, gastric paresis, or gastric dysmotility. We describe a technique of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube placement which is easy and effective. It is noteworthy that this method may be used in patients who have had previous abdominal operations, and it has the added advantage of a direct peritoneal view of the viscera. We suggest that qualified laparoscopic surgeons learn the technique of laparoscopic jejunostomy.

Enteral Nutrition↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Concomitant placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies have gained wide use for long-term enteral nutrition. However, gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration pneumonia have occurred following this procedure. Initial enthusiasm concerning the ability of intrajejunal feeding to negate the risk of aspiration has been challenged by some reports. In this report, a new method is described for concomitant placement of endoscopic gastrostomy and feeding jejunostomy wherein the tip of the feeding jejunostomy is placed at least 40 cm distal to the pylorus while the gastrostomy tube is used for drainage. Twenty critically ill patients underwent the procedure utilizing general or local anesthesia. Sixty-day follow-up showed one uneventful episode of pulmonary aspiration (5%) after retrograde migration of the jejunal tube into the duodenum. All but two patients (90%) tolerated their tube feedings well. This technique can be easily performed with accurate placement of the PEJ tube distal to the pylorus and is associated with minimal risk of aspiration.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Totally laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: A feeding jejunostomy should be used for nutritional support in a small subset of patients. Minimal-access approaches for the placement of jejunal tubes have been described, but they often require special equipment not common to all operating theaters. We describe a technique of totally laparoscopic jejunostomy tube (LJT) placement using equipment found in most operating theaters. METHODS: Thirty-five patients underwent LJT over a 12-month period. Indications included gastroparesis, anorexia nervosa, oral cancer, cerebral palsy, and Huntington's chorea. The technique involved three incisions for trocars (one for a 10-mm camera and two for 5-mm working ports) and one small incision for the tube. A 16-Fr T-tube was passed transabdominally under direct vision, and a jejunotomy was made approximately 20 cm distal to the ligament of Trietz. Each limb of the T-tube was passed into the lumen of the bowel, and a purse-string suture was placed around the enterotomy and tied intracorporeally. After insertion, the serosa surrounding the insertion site is tacked to the anterior abdominal wall in four places with a reusable stainless steel suture passer. To test whether the tube was watertight, we injected methylene blue solution into the tube. RESULTS: All of the patients tolerated the procedure well. There were no operative deaths. Five LJTs were electively removed in the office. One patient was reoperated on 10 days postoperatively because of intractable pain, but the source of pain was not found and the LJT was intact. CONCLUSIONS: LJT may be placed safely using the described technique. No significant morbidity or mortality occurred in our series. The results of this study have prompted us to consider LJT for any patient requiring access to the jejunum for feeding.

Anorexia Nervosa↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy in esophagogastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with esophagogastric malignancies often require nutritional supplementation in the perioperative period, especially in the setting where neoadjuvant therapy may delay tumor resection. A simple technique is described here that can be performed at the time of staging laparoscopy and that has not been described before. RESULTS: Forty-three patients treated over a 4-year period who had a laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy placed at the time of staging laparoscopy were reviewed. Of these, 35 had preoperative chemotherapy according to a modified MRC OEO2 protocol. In the period between staging and eventual resection, 32% required immediate feeding, and in 14% of those who were thought not to need feeding it later became necessary. More patients gained weight or had a rise in albumin in the group that had jejunal feeding (p < 0.05). The mean time to surgery was 10 weeks. There were no conversions to an open procedure, nor were there any laparotomies for tube-related complications. Dislodgement was recorded in 6 patients; blockage, in 4. In most of these cases a simple bedside replacement of the tube was all that was required. Mean time in the operating room for each procedure was 44 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic percutaneous feeding jejunostomy is a safe and simple technique that adds little to the morbidity and cost of managing patients with esophagogastric cancers. It facilitates optimization of nutrition in the perioperative period for these patients, especially in those receiving preoperative chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Venting direct percutaneous jejunostomy (DPEJ) for drainage of malignant bowel obstruction in patients operated on for gastric cancer.

Malignant chronic bowel obstruction (MCBO) is a syndrome caused by abdomen-pelvic diffusion of neoplastic diseases of any origin. It generally occurs in an advanced disease, affecting 3-15% of patients recently operated, untreated, or submitted to radiotherapy. Patients complain of chronic pain and vomitus. The approach to this problem is multidisciplinary, involving the surgeon, the endoscopist, the oncologist, and the pain-therapy expert. Direct percutaneous jejunostomy (DPEJ) using a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is a jejunal percutaneous access procedure indicated for nutrition in those patients whose stomach cannot be used, as in cases of partially or totally gastrectomized ones. A venting PEG or percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) is a solution to drain the gastrointestinal tract for MCBO even in difficult cases represented by patients with previous abdominal surgery, those with partial or total gastrectomies, ascites, or peritoneal carcinosis. We report our five-case experience of draining an MCBO in patients previously operated on for gastric cancer, using a DPEJ technique that we believe is the best technique for this purpose.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Needle catheter jejunostomy: a controlled, prospective, randomized trial in patients with gynecologic malignancy.

Sixty patients with gynecologic cancer entered a prospective, randomized study of immediate postoperative feeding. Thirty-three women in the study group received an elemental diet (Vivonex HN) delivered through a needle catheter jejunostomy. Twenty-seven patients in the control group were given standard 5% dextrose and electrolyte solutions. Patients in both groups were stratified according to nutritional status as determined by anthropometric evaluation and levels of serum albumin, total protein, and transferrin. These parameters also were measured at intervals throughout the study. Only one catheter-related complication occurred. Patients in the study group received significantly more calories (p = 0.01) and were better able to maintain serum levels of transferrin (p = 0.05) than those in the control group. An elemental diet administered through the needle catheter jejunostomy effectively maintains postoperative nutrition and is associated with few complications.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗