Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Embryonic Induction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Characterizing gene expression during lens formation in Xenopus laevis: evaluating the model for embryonic lens induction.

Few directed searches have been undertaken to identify the genes involved in vertebrate lens formation. In the frog Xenopus, the larval cornea can undergo a process of transdifferentiation to form a new lens once the original lens is removed. Based on preliminary evidence, we have shown that this process shares many elements of a common molecular/genetic pathway to that involved in embryonic lens development. A subtracted cDNA library, enriched for genes expressed during cornea-lens transdifferentiation, was prepared. The similarities/identities of specific clones isolated from the subtracted cDNA library define an expression profile of cells undergoing cornea-lens transdifferentiation ("lens regeneration") and corneal wound healing (the latter representing a consequence of the surgery required to trigger transdifferentiation). Screens were undertaken to search for genes expressed during both transdifferentiation and embryonic lens development. Significantly, new genes were recovered that are also expressed during embryonic lens development. The expression of these genes, as well as others known to be expressed during embryonic development in Xenopus, can be correlated with different periods of embryonic lens induction and development, in an attempt to define these events in a molecular context. This information is considered in light of our current working model of embryonic lens induction, in which specific tissue properties and phases of induction have been previously defined in an experimental context. Expression data reveal the existence of further levels of complexity in this process and suggests that individual phases of lens induction and specific tissue properties are not strictly characterized or defined by expression of individual genes.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Molecular mechanisms of neural crest induction.

The neural crest is an embryonic cell population that originates at the border between the neural plate and the prospective epidermis. Around the time of neural tube closure, neural crest cells emigrate from the neural tube, migrate along defined paths in the embryo and differentiate into a wealth of derivatives. Most of the craniofacial skeleton, the peripheral nervous system, and the pigment cells of the body originate from neural crest cells. This cell type has important clinical relevance, since many of the most common craniofacial birth defects are a consequence of abnormal neural crest development. Whereas the migration and differentiation of the neural crest have been extensively studied, we are just beginning to understand how this tissue originates. The formation of the neural crest has been described as a classic example of embryonic induction, in which specific tissue interactions and the concerted action of signaling pathways converge to induce a multipotent population of neural crest precursor cells. In this review, we summarize the current status of knowledge on neural crest induction. We place particular emphasis on the signaling molecules and tissue interactions involved, and the relationship between neural crest induction, the formation of the neural plate and neural plate border, and the genes that are upregulated as a consequence of the inductive events.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Induction of tubules in rat metanephrogenic mesenchyme in the absence of an inductive tissue.

Differentiation of metanephrogenic mesenchyme to renal tubular epithelium requires induction by the ureteric bud in vivo or any of several embryonic tissues in vitro. In an effort to eliminate the tissue requirement in embryonic induction, extracellular matrices and soluble factors were analyzed individually or in combination for their ability to stimulate tubulogenesis in uninduced metanephrogenic mesenchyme from 13-gestation-day rat embryos. These evaluations have established that pituitary extract and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in concert with a matrix can promote morphogenesis of mesenchymal rudiments in culture. While type I collagen, laminin, or fibronectin matrices all promoted tubulogenesis in the presence of pituitary extract and EGF, type IV collagen proved the most effective. Under these conditions, tubules were induced in 23/24 mesenchymal rudiments by 9 days in culture. Mesenchyme was not induced prior to explanation since it formed no tubules when cultured in a medium that allowed tubulogenesis in intact embryonic kidneys. Preliminary characterization of the undefined factor in pituitary extract was consistent with a protein of molecular weight greater than 100,000 but less than 300,000. When uninduced metanephrogenic mesenchyme from mouse was used instead of rat tissue, a similar pattern of morphogenesis was not observed, suggesting that the described medium is inappropriate for promoting differentiation in mouse or, less likely, that different mechanisms mediate differentiation in rat and mouse. These studies show that embryonic induction can occur in explanted rat renal mesenchyme in an appropriate environment and does not require the presence of an inductive tissue.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Dickkopf1 is required for embryonic head induction and limb morphogenesis in the mouse.

Dickkopf1 (Dkk1) is a secreted protein that acts as a Wnt inhibitor and, together with BMP inhibitors, is able to induce the formation of ectopic heads in Xenopus. Here, we show that Dkk1 null mutant embryos lack head structures anterior of the midbrain. Analysis of chimeric embryos implicates the requirement of Dkk1 in anterior axial mesendoderm but not in anterior visceral endoderm for head induction. In addition, mutant embryos show duplications and fusions of limb digits. Characterization of the limb phenotype strongly suggests a role for Dkk1 both in cell proliferation and in programmed cell death. Our data provide direct genetic evidence for the requirement of secreted Wnt antagonists during embryonic patterning and implicate Dkk1 as an essential inducer during anterior specification as well as a regulator during distal limb patterning.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

The origin of cell-type differences in early embryos.

Differences between cells first arise in embryonic development by two principal mechanisms. One is the asymmetric distribution of cytoplasmic substances at mitosis in eggs and early embryos. The other is cell interaction or embryonic induction. Certain aspects of these major mechanisms are considered, and emphasis is placed on the value of molecular markers. The effects of unequal cell division on the concentration of cytoplasmic determinants are discussed. In embryonic induction, the nature and timing of response is determined more by properties of the responding tissue than by those of the inducing molecules. Possible future directions of work are discussed in relation to experience with amphibian eggs and oocytes.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

An FGF response pathway that mediates hepatic gene induction in embryonic endoderm cells.

While particular combinations of mesodermal signals are known to induce distinct tissue-specific programs in the endoderm, there is little information about the response pathways within endoderm cells that control their specification. We have used signaling inhibitors on embryo tissue explants and whole-embryo cultures as well as genetic approaches to reveal part of an intracellular network by which FGF signaling helps induce hepatic genes and stabilize nascent hepatic cells within the endodermal epithelium. Specifically, we found that hepatic gene induction is elicited by an FGF/MAPK pathway. Although the PI3K pathway is activated in foregut endoderm cells, its inhibition does not block hepatic gene induction in explants; however, it does block tissue growth. We also found that at the onset of hepatogenesis, the FGF/MAPK and PI3K pathways do not crossregulate in the endoderm. The finding of separate pathways for endoderm tissue specification and growth provides insights for guiding cellular regeneration and stem cell differentiation.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2002

Sequential induction of embryonic and adult forms of glutamic acid decarboxylase during in vitro-induced neurogenesis in cloned neuroectodermal cell-line, NE-7C2.

The expression of different forms of glutamate decarboxylases and GABA was investigated in the course of retinoic acid-induced neuronal differentiation of NE-7C2 cell-line established from brain vesicles of 9-day-old mouse embryos lacking functional p53 gene. Non-induced NE-7C2 cells expressed embryonic GAD mRNAs with a low level of embryonic GAD25 protein and did not contain detectable amounts of GABA. Addition of 10(-6) M retinoic acid induced the expression of N-tubulin and a significant increase in the level of embryonic GAD messages and GAD25 protein in early stage differentiating neurones. The enzymatically active embryonic GAD44 was detected at later stages of induction in neurone-like cells and showed a maximum of expression at the time of neurite elongation and network formation. With the advance of neuronal maturation, the expression of embryonic forms declined while the adult GAD65 and GAD67 transcripts became dominant. GABA-containing neurones were first demonstrated on the sixth day of induction coinciding with the peak of GAD44 expression and the beginning of GAD65 expression. The sequential induction of different GAD forms and the stage-dependent GABA synthesis in NE-7C2 cells is highly reminiscent of the temporal pattern found in vivo and suggests that these processes might be involved in the differentiation of neuronal progenitors.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Germ layer induction from embryonic stem cells.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells have the potential to develop into all cell types of the adult body. This capability provides the basis for considering the ES cell system as a novel and unlimited source of cells for replacement therapies for the treatment of a wide range of diseases. Before the cell-based therapy potential of ES cells can be realized, a better understanding of the pathways regulating lineage-specific differentiation is required. Current studies suggest that the bone morphogenic protein, transforming growth factor-beta, Wnt, and fibroblast growth factor pathways that are required for gastrulation and germ layer induction in the embryo are also essential for differentiation of ES cells in culture. The current understanding of how these factors influence germ layer induction in both the embryo and in the ES cell differentiation system is addressed in this review.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Lithium-sensitive production of inositol phosphates during amphibian embryonic mesoderm induction.

Mesoderm induction and body axis determination in frog (Xenopus) embryos are thought to involve growth factor-mediated cell-cell signaling, but the signal transduction pathways are unknown. Li+, which inhibits the polyphosphoinositide (PI) cycle signal transduction pathway in many cells, also disrupts axis determination and mesoderm induction. Amounts of the PI cycle-derived second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, increased during mesoderm induction in normal embryos; addition of Li+ inhibited the embryonic inositol monophosphatase and reversed this increase. Embryonic PI cycle activity thus shows characteristics that indicate it may function in mesoderm induction and axis determination.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Embryonic axis induction by the armadillo repeat domain of beta-catenin: evidence for intracellular signaling.

beta-catenin was identified as a cytoplasmic cadherin-associated protein required for cadherin adhesive function (Nagafuchi, A., and M. Takeichi. 1989. Cell Regul. 1:37-44; Ozawa, M., H. Baribault, and R. Kemler. 1989. EMBO [Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.] J. 8:1711-1717). Subsequently, it was found to be the vertebrate homologue of the Drosophila segment polarity gene product Armadillo (McCrea, P. D., C. W. Turck, and B. Gumbiner. 1991. Science [Wash. DC]. 254:1359-1361; Peifer, M., and E. Wieschaus. 1990. Cell. 63:1167-1178). Also, antibody perturbation experiments implicated beta-catenin in axial patterning of the early Xenopus embryo (McCrea, P. D., W. M. Brieher, and B. M. Gumbiner. 1993. J. Cell Biol. 123:477-484). Here we report that overexpression of beta-catenin in the ventral side of the early Xenopus embryo, by injection of synthetic beta-catenin mRNA, induces the formation of a complete secondary body axis. Furthermore, an analysis of beta-catenin deletion constructs demonstrates that the internal armadillo repeat region is both necessary and sufficient to induce axis duplication. This region interacts with C-cadherin and with the APC tumor suppressor protein, but not with alpha-catenin, that requires the amino-terminal region of beta-catenin to bind to the complex. Since alpha-catenin is required for cadherin-mediated adhesion, the armadillo repeat region alone probably cannot promote cell adhesion, making it unlikely that beta-catenin induces axis duplication by increasing cell adhesion. We propose, rather, that beta-catenin acts in this circumstance as an intracellular signaling molecule. Subcellular fractionation demonstrated that all of the beta-catenin constructs that contain the armadillo repeat domain were present in both the soluble cytosolic and the membrane fraction. Immunofluorescence staining confirmed the plasma membrane and cytoplasmic localization of the constructs containing the armadillo repeat region, but revealed that they also accumulate in the nucleus, especially the construct containing only the armadillo repeat domain. These findings and the beta-catenin protein interaction data offer several intriguing possibilities for the site of action or the protein targets of beta-catenin signaling activity.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein↗
PubMed1988

Reinvestigation of the role of the optic vesicle in embryonic lens induction.

The induction of the lens by the optic vesicle in amphibians is often cited as support for the view that a single inductive event can lead to determination in a multipotent tissue. This conclusion is based on transplantation experiments whose results indicate that many regions of embryonic ectoderm which would normally form epidermis can form a lens if brought into contact with the optic vesicle. Although additional evidence argues that during normal development other tissues, acting before the optic vesicle, also contribute to lens induction, it is still widely held, on the basis of these transplantation experiments, that the optic vesicle alone can elicit lens formation in ectoderm. While testing this conclusion by transplanting optic vesicles beneath ventral ectoderm in Xenopus laevis embryos, it became apparent that contamination of optic vesicles by presumptive lens ectoderm cells can generate lenses in these experiments, illustrating the need for adequate host and donor marking procedures. Since previous studies rarely used host and donor marking, it was not clear whether they actually demonstrated that the optic vesicle can induce lenses. Using careful host and donor marking procedures with horseradish peroxidase as a lineage tracer, we show that the optic vesicle cannot stimulate lens formation in neurula- or gastrula-stage ectoderm of Xenopus laevis. Since the general conclusion that the optic vesicle is sufficient for lens induction rests on studies in many organisms, we felt it was important to begin to test this conclusion in other amphibians as well. Similar experiments were therefore performed with Rana Palustris embryos, since it was in this organism that optic vesicle transplant studies had originally argued that this tissue alone can cause lens induction. Under conditions similar to those used in the original report, but with careful controls to assess the origin of lenses in transplants, we found that the optic vesicle alone cannot elicit lens formation. Our data lead us to propose that the optic vesicle in amphibians is not generally sufficient for lens induction. Instead, we argue that lens induction occurs by a multistep process in which an essential phase in lens determination occurs as a result of inductive interactions preceding contact of ectoderm with the optic vesicle.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Consequences of the Spemann-Mangold organizer concept for embryological research in Russia: personal impressions.

The impact of the organizer concept on Russian experimental embryology is shortly reviewed. Attempts to study embryonic induction in Russia may be grouped into embryological and biochemical approaches. This paper provides a framework for, and overvalue of, the contributions of Russian biologists to the problem of embryonic induction. Two model systems--lens and neural inductions--are of special significance to modern developmental biologists. Moreover, the study of eye lens induction actually gave rise to research on developmental mechanics in Russia. This was one of the reasons why we limited this article to these two model systems. After retrospective consideration of the results of the search for possible lens-inducing factor candidates, the discussion turns towards some of the examples of neural-inducing agents detected in embryonic tissues and the new questions raised by the progress that has been made in the analysis of the Spemann-Mangold organizer.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Evo-Devo: evolutionary developmental mechanisms.

Evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-Devo) as a discipline is concerned, among other things, with discovering and understanding the role of changes in developmental mechanisms in the evolutionary origin of aspects of the phenotype. In a very real sense, Evo-Devo opens the black box between genotype and phenotype, or more properly, phenotypes as multiple life history stages arise in many organisms from a single genotype. Changes in the timing or positioning of an aspect of development in a descendant relative to an ancestor (heterochrony and heterotopy) were two evolutionary developmental mechanisms identified by Ernst Haeckel in the 1870s. Many more have since been identified, in large part because of our enhanced understanding of development and because new mechanisms emerge as development proceeds: the transfer from maternal to zygotic genomic control; cell-to-cell interactions; cell differentiation and cell migration; embryonic inductions; functional interactions at the tissue and organ levels; growth. Within these emergent processes, gene networks and gene cascades (genetic modules) link the genotype with morphogenetic units (cellular modules, namely germ layers, embryonic fields or cellular condensations), while epigenetic processes such as embryonic inductions, tissue interactions and functional integration, link morphogenetic units to the phenotype. Evolutionary developmental mechanisms also include interactions between individuals of the same species, individuals of different species, and species and their biotic and/or abiotic environment. Such interactions link ecological communities. Importantly, there is little to distinguish the causality that underlies these interactions from that which underlies inductive interactions within embryos.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

In vitro induction systems for analyses of amphibian organogenesis and body patterning.

The discovery that some well-known growth factors have inducing activity in embryogenesis has accelerated our understanding of embryonic induction. Relevant receptors, signal transduction pathways and patterns of gene expression have been characterized over the past decade. Amphibian embryos have provided an excellent model for analysis of embryonic induction because they are easily surgically manipulated and cultured in vitro, and with the addition of treatment with various inducing factors we have been able to control organogenesis and body patterning during early development in vitro. Activin A, a TGF-beta family protein, has a potent mesoderm-inducing activity on the isolated ectoderm called the animal cap. Activin induces animal caps to differentiate into various mesodermal and endodermal tissues, including beating hearts, in a dose-dependent fashion. Activin, in combination with retinoic acid, also induces the formation of the pronephros, a primitive embryonic kidney. The in vitro induced kidney was confirmed to function in vivo in a transplantation experiment. Furthermore, the activin-induced animal caps organize heads or trunk-and-tails in exactly the same manner as the organizer. The potential use of in vitro induction systems to further our understanding of vertebrate organogenesis and body patterning will be discussed.

Activins↗
PubMed1996

DNA sequences mediating the transcriptional response of the Mix.2 homeobox gene to mesoderm induction.

Peptide growth factors can initiate changes in cell fate in Xenopus ectodermal explants and induce the formation of mesoderm. Marker genes expressed in mesoderm allow the analysis of whether, or how much, induction has occurred, but do not tell us what molecules are involved in carrying out the response. In this report we describe the isolation of genomic and cDNA clones of Mix.2, a gene closely related to the Xenopus homeobox gene Mix.1, and demonstrate that the promoter of the Mix.2 gene is responsive to mesoderm induction signals when linked to a CAT reporter and microinjected into developing Xenopus embryos. Like the chromosomal Mix.1 gene, microinjected Mix.2 gene plasmids respond to activin in the presence of cycloheximide in animal cap assays and also respond to the embryonic inductive signal in Nieuwkoop recombinants. The injected promoter does not respond to TGF-beta2 or FGF. Deletion analysis of the Mix.2 promoter demonstrated that sequences required for maximal transcriptional activity in response to mesoderm induction are scattered across a 290-bp region. This is the first report of a microinjected plasmid responding to immediate-early transcriptional activation in developing Xenopus embryos. This assay reduces the complexity of the cellular response to embryonic induction to the simple question of which molecules activate the Mix.2 promoter and provides a sensitive and rapid test with which to pursue the answer.

Activins↗
PubMed1994

Discrete endogenous signals mediate neural competence and induction in P19 embryonal carcinoma stem cells.

Endogenous signals capable of inducing neuroectodermal differentiation are expressed by differentiating P19 EC cells in vitro. The present study demonstrates that at least two discrete signals are required. One is expressed by isolated primitive streak mesoderm-like cell lines and has the capacity to induce the expression of Pax-3 but, alone, induces neural differentiation inefficiently. The second signal is not expressed by the primitive streak mesoderm-like cell line but is present in conditioned media from differentiating P19 EC cells following DMSO treatment. This signal does not induce either Pax-3 expression or morphological differentiation and does not commit stem cells to a neuroectodermal fate. Rather, it acts synergistically with the signal derived from the primitive streak mesoderm-like cells to increase the efficiency with which stem cells respond initially by Pax-3 expression and subsequently by differentiation towards neural lineages. The activity of this second signal can be replaced by forskolin and 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine suggesting that its effects are transduced by a cyclic nucleotide-dependent pathway.

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗
PubMed1982

[Effect of heterogeneous inducers on the ectoderm of the early gastrula in Rana temporaria in vitro. IV. The inductive effect of embryonic tissue extracts after ribonuclease and proteinase treatment].

An attempt was undertaken to determine the chemical nature of the neuralizing and lens-inducing effect of the retina and brain extracts from 7-8 day old chick embryos. These extracts were treated with immobilized enzymes (RNAse, proteinase K) and the effect of treatment was then estimated in the organ cultures (reacting tissue - early gastrula ectoderm). The effect of the enzymes was studied in different experimental variants which allowed to exclude the effect of the own proteases and temperature on the inducing activity of the extracts under study. The neuralizing activity of the retinal extract was shown to preserve after its treatment with RNAse but to be almost fully lost (or decrease) after proteolytic hydrolysis. Proteinase suppressed as well completely the lens-inducing effect of the extract from the chick embryo brain. A conclusion is drawn that the inducing activity of the extracts under study is due to proteins, rather than to RNA.

Animals↗