Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Elbow Prosthesis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Arthroplasty of the elbow. Experience with the Mark III GSB prosthesis.

Forty-five total elbow replacements using the Mark III GSB prosthesis are reviewed. Average follow-up was 2.7 years. The overall results were good in 87% of cases, fair in 9%, and poor in 4%. Excluding the two poor results, which required prosthesis removal, 96% of cases had no significant pain. The flexion/extension are improved 24 degrees and the supination/pronation arc improved 22 degrees. No prosthesis was loose and only one had a significant radiolucent line. The overall complication rate was 25%. Disassembling of the two components, due to inadequate ligament tension, was the most frequent complication and this occurred in four elbows.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Fracture of the radial head with associated elbow dislocation: results of treatment using a floating radial head prosthesis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess elbow function, complications, and problems of radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation receiving surgical treatment with a floating prosthesis. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium. PATIENTS: Eleven consecutive adult patients were treated with a floating prosthesis for acute radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation from January 1994 to September 1996. INTERVENTION: The floating radial head prosthesis (Tornier SA, Saint-Ismier, France) was used in all our patients. The implant is in two parts: a radial head made of high-density polyethylene enclosed in a cobalt-chrome cup, which articulates in a semiconstrained manner with the spherical end of a cemented intramedullary stem. The implants were inserted within the first week following the injury (range 2 to 7 days). Three cases also required internal fixation of the coronoid process of the ulna; in one case plate fixation of an olecranon fracture was also performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were assessed by physical examination, a functional rating index (Morrey et al.), and radiographs. The parameters evaluated were motion, stability, pain, and grip strength. Potential complications such as infection, prosthetic failure, or dislocation were investigated. RESULTS: The minimum follow-up time was two years (mean 32 months, range 24 to 56 months). Four patients were considered to have excellent results, four patients were considered to have good results, two patients had fair results, and one patient had a poor result. There were no cases of infection, prosthetic failure, or dislocation. No patient required prosthetic revision. CONCLUSION: The basic principle of maintaining anatomic and physiologic relationships applies when deciding on treatment for radial head fractures with associated elbow dislocation. The loss of lateral osseous support will render the elbow grossly unstable. We believe that a floating prosthesis may be indicated in Mason Type III radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation, especially in the presence of associated destabilizing fractures. Well-controlled comparative randomized studies will be needed to delineate the optimal treatment for a given situation.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Total elbow arthroplasty with the Kudo prosthesis.

Between 1990 and 1997 we undertook 57 Kudo type-4 total elbow replacements in 45 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 34 patients (44 elbows) were evaluated at an average of 7 (4.4-11.2) years using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. At review 29 elbows were excellent or good and four were fair or poor. The main complications were intraoperative fractures and ulnar neuropathy. No luxations were seen. Loosening of the ulnar component and breakage of the humeral component were most frequent indications for revision. Preoperative radiographic joint destruction was not correlated with revision rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Total elbow arthroplasty with the Coonrad/Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis. A 10- to 31-year survival analysis.

There have been few reports in the literature of total elbow arthroplasty extending beyond 10 to 15 years. We reviewed 40 patients (41 elbows) with a mean age of 56 years (19 to 83) who had undergone a Coonrad/Coonrad-Morrey elbow arthroplasty by one surgeon for various diagnoses between 1974 and 1994. Surgical selection excluded patients with previous elbow infection or who refused to accept a sedentary level of elbow activity postoperatively. Objective data were collected from charts, radiographs, clinical photographs and supplemented by the referring orthopaedic surgeons' records and radiographs if health or distance prevented a patient from returning for final review. Subjective outcome was defined by patient satisfaction. Of the 41 elbows, 21 were functional between 10 and 14 years after operation, ten between 15 and 19 years and ten between 20 and 31 years. There were 14 complications and 13 revisions, but no cases of acute infection, or permanent removal of any implant.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Recent fractures of the radial head associated with elbow instability treated with floating Judet prosthesis].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Fracture of the radial head associated with elbow instability is infrequent. We report a retrospective series of floating Judet prostheses implanted for comminutive fractures of the radial head associated with elbow laxity caused either by dislocation or rupture of the medial collateral ligaments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The series included ten patients who underwent surgery from October 1996 to September 2002 at the Amiens University Hospital. The indication for radial head prosthesis was established in the emergency setting for fracture unamendable by osteosyntheis and elbow laxity. Mean age was 48.2 years (25-69). All patients were seen at mean follow-up of 31.7 months (18-48). According to the Mason classification as modified by Johnson, all patients had type 4 fracture. A Judet radial head prosthesis with a floating metallic cup was implanted in all patients. An investigator other than the operators evaluated outcome using the Mayo Clinic criteria. RESULTS: Joint motion as measured by goniometry was: mean flexion 121degrees (90-140 degrees), mean extension deficit 20 degrees (5-60 degrees), mean pronation 45 degrees (0-85 degrees), mean supination 42.5 degrees (0-90 degrees). The Mayo clinic score was excellent in 3, good in 2, fair in 3, and poor in 2 (prosthesis dislocation in one and hung prosthesis requiring removal in one). Four patients developed periarticular ossifications compromising the final result. DISCUSSION: The floating Judet prosthesis allows optimal adaptation of the implant to anatomy and function. For us, these implants are indispensable when the radial head fracture is associated with elbow instability. The indication for prosthesis may be questionable if the non-fixed fracture is free of associated ligament injury, as suggested by the good long-term reported after simple resection. Rigorous operative technique is crucial, with careful restitution of the radial height. The quality of the result is related to the degree of capsule and ligament injury even after optimal implant positioning. Preventive treatment against periarticular ossification should be systematic.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Total elbow arthroplasty: revision with use of a non-custom semiconstrained prosthesis.

The results of revision elbow arthroplasty with use of the semiconstrained Mayo-modified Coonrad implant in forty-one patients were reviewed retrospectively. The average duration of follow-up was six years (range, two to thirteen years). At the time of the latest follow-up evaluation, thirty-eight patients were able to perform activities of daily living, one had a stiff elbow because of heterotopic ossification, one had weakness secondary to an injury of the radial nerve, and one had an unstable elbow after removal of the prosthesis because of recurrent aseptic loosening. Fourteen patients sustained either a fracture or a perforation of the cortex at the time of removal of the primary implant. Three of these patients had an injury of the radial nerve; the injury was due to extravasation of the cement from a cortical defect in two of them and was sustained during removal of the cement in one. Eight patients had an intraoperative or postoperative complication that necessitated additional operative intervention. Postoperatively, twenty-two patients had complete relief of pain and sixteen had mild discomfort. Three patients remained disabled: one, because of pain secondary to loosening of the component; one, because of a pre-existing nerve injury; and one, because of the residual effects of an intraoperative injury of the radial nerve. The average Mayo elbow performance score was 87 +/- 16 points at the latest follow-up evaluation, compared with 44 +/- 17 points preoperatively (p < 0.0001). Revision elbow arthroplasty restored function to the patients who had had a failed prosthesis without infection.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Total elbow replacement using the Kudo prosthesis. Clinical and radiological review with five- to seven-year follow-up.

Between 1993 and 1996, we undertook 35 Kudo 5 total elbow replacements in a consecutive series of 31 rheumatoid patients. A total of 25 patients (29 procedures) was evaluated at a mean follow-up of six years (5 to 7.5) using the Mayo Clinic performance index. In addition, all patients were assessed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. At review, 19 elbows (65%) had either no pain or mild pain, ten (35%) had moderate pain and none had severe pain. The mean arc of flexion/extension was 94 degrees (35 to 130) and supination/pronation was 128 degrees (30 to 165). A fracture of the medial epicondyle occurred during surgery in one patient. This was successfully treated with a single AO screw and a standard Kudo 5 implant was inserted. Postoperatively, there were no infections. One patient had a dislocation which was treated by closed reduction and five had neurapraxia of the ulnar nerve. Radiologically, there was no evidence of loosening of the humeral component, but two ulnar components had progressive radiolucent lines suggestive of loosening. Two other ulnar components had incomplete and non-progressive radiolucent lines. With definite radiological loosening as the endpoint, the probability of survival of the Kudo 5 prosthesis at five years using the Kaplan-Meier method was 89%.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

The Guildford elbow joint.

The Guildford Elbow Joint prosthesis uses a non-rigid hinge articulation combined with intra-medullary stems to replace the humero-ulnar joint. The metal-on-plastic articulating surfaces are designed to allow some subluxation and accessory movements while remaining self-centering and stable under load. The intra-medullary stems are shaped to provide a good fit in the curves shafts of the ulna and humerus and should provide good fixation without the removal of large amounts of bone. The prosthesis is fixed with acrylic cement. The design follows, where possible, the normal anatomy and function of the elbow. A correct operative technique is important, but the procedure shows no particular difficulties.

Elbow Joint↗
PubMed1996

The elbow joint and its total arthroplasty. Part II. Finite element study.

The stresses in various sections of two-dimensional models of the elbow joint, without and with a prosthesis (the humeral component of a total elbow prosthesis), were obtained using the finite element analysis method. Three parameters were varied: type of applied load; method of fixation of the prosthesis to the contiguous bone; and shape of the head of the prosthesis. The results are discussed with particular reference to stress shielding and overload in the cortical and cancellous bones, respectively, and a qualitative comparison between the present values and those given by previous workers who used three-dimensional models. Comments are made regarding the clinical implications of the results.

Adult↗