Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Hyperextension injury of the cervical spine with esophageal perforation. Case report.

A case is presented of esophageal perforation following a hyperextension-flexion cervical injury. The patient recovered without complication. Hyperextension-flexion injuries of the cervical spine have proved to be a rare cause of esophageal perforation. The mechanism may be impingement of the esophagus against an exostosis or the edge of a vertebral body, or entrapment of the esophageal wall between the vertebral bodies as hyperextension changes to flexion. If not detected and treated early, the perforation may cause mediastinitis, retropharyngeal abscess, aspiration pneumonia, or death.

Cervical Vertebrae↗

[A case of idiopathic esophageal perforation (Boerhaave's syndrome)].

76 year-old man was transferred to emergency room because of severe epigastralgia and dyspnea. He was well until 5 hours before admission, when he suddenly felt severe epigastralgia followed by vomiting. He was found to be in warm shock state. Chest X-ray film showed dilation of mediastinum, pneumo mediastinum, left pleural effusion and subcutaneous emphysema, which were consistent with esophageal perforation. Esophageal contrast study was diagnostic. Emergency operation was performed in which rupture of the lowest esophagus causing remarkable mediastinitis and pleuritis was observed. Esophageal tear was primarily closed and chest drains were placed. Despite severe post-operative complications, he was discharged with recovery 5 months later.

Aged↗

Successful nonoperative management of delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical outcome of esophageal stenting for repair of distal esophageal perforation in one patient with septic shock and human immunodeficiency virus. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care units of one university teaching hospital. PATIENT: One patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection and septic shock in whom there was a delay in diagnosis of spontaneous perforation at the distal thoracic esophagus. INTERVENTION: A 10 cm x 2 cm silicone lined, partially coated, expandable metal stent was fluoroscopically placed in the distal esophagus at the perforation. Other treatment included chest tube thoracostomy, sump drainage of proximal esophagus, percutaneous gastrostomy, and antibiotics. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Septic shock and the distal esophageal perforation were successfully treated with combined esophageal stenting, thoracostomy pleural drainage and antibiotics. Esophageal stenting was accomplished fluoroscopically with a partially coated, silicone-lined, expandable metal stent. CONCLUSION: Esophageal stenting, tube thoracostomy drainage, and antibiotics may be a management option for gravely ill patients with human immunodeficiency virus, esophageal perforation, and a delay in diagnosis. An optimal outcome requires a thoughtful, individualized approach and adherence to basic principles.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Occult esophageal perforation associated with cervical spine fracture.

A case of surgically confirmed cervical esophageal perforation associated with burst fractures of two cervical vertebral bodies is presented. We also describe a second case in which an incidentally discovered abscess of the cervical region could have been the result of esophageal perforation secondary to spine injury. Both patients had negative positive contrast esophagograms . This complication of cervical spine injury is extremely rare, and diagnosis can be difficult. Cervical esophageal perforation must be considered in the face of unexplained cervical, thoracic, or systemic sepsis and in the presence of an unexplained cervical mass. Severe cervical fracture with or without subluxation seems to constitute the anatomical basis for the entity. The treatment consists of drainage and antibiotics aimed at oral flora. The clinical features, diagnostic tests, and surgical management of this entity are reviewed.

Adult↗

Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair?

Ninety patients with esophageal perforations were operated on at our institutions between 1970 and 1992. Thirty-four of them were seen after delayed diagnosis (> 24 hours) with mediastinal sepsis caused by perforation of the thoracic esophagus. There were 18 patients with spontaneous ruptures, 11 with instrumental perforations (including one caused during laparotomy), and 3 perforations caused by foreign bodies. One patient had perforation of an esophageal ulcer into the pericardium and another had perforation of an esophageal diverticulum into the mediastinum. Nineteen patients underwent primary repair of the perforation with cleansing and drainage of the mediastinum and the pleural cavity. The remaining 15 had primary extirpation of the thoracic esophagus, irrigation of the mediastinum with antibiotics, cervical esophagostomy, gastrostomy, and drainage of the mediastinum and pleural cavity. Nineteen of the 34 patients survived (hospital mortality 44%). Of patients with primary repair, only six survived (in-hospital mortality 68%), whereas only two patients treated with esophagectomy died (in-hospital mortality 13%). The difference was highly significant (p = 0.001). The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure resulting from sepsis. Postoperative complications developed in four patients treated with primary repair (two sepsis, one empyema, and one anuria) and in seven patients treated with esophagectomy (two empyema, two sepsis, one pneumonia, one mediastinal abscess, and one brain abscess). After healing of the mediastinitis, the esophagogastric continuity was reconstructed with colon in 11 patients and stomach in two patients. In the management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis, esophagectomy is superior to primary repair alone, which often leads to mediastinal leakage, continued sepsis, and death.

Aged↗

[Treatment of esophageal perforations. Considerations on a clinical case].

The Authors describe a rare case of esophageal perforation occurred after Transoesophageal echocardiography in 68 years old patient and review the literature relating to the causes and management of this pathology. Transoesophageal echocardiography, which is a semi-invasive investigation increasingly used in cardiology and cardiac surgery and intensive care units, is a rare though extremely dangerous cause of such complications. Perforation of the esophagus continues to present a formidable diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The diagnosis depends on a high degree of suspicion and on the recognition of clinical features and is confirmed by contrast esophagography. The outcome after esophageal perforation depends on the location of the injury, the presence or otherwise of concomitant esophageal disease and the time elapsing between the injury and inititian of treatment. Reinforced primary repair of the perforation is the procedure most frequently employed and preferred for the surgical management of the esophageal perforation. In the case reported here, early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment consisting in primary repair of the esophageal perforation contributed to the successful management of this serious pathology.

Aged↗

Sonographic detection of a malpositioned feeding tube causing esophageal perforation in a neonate.

We report a case of esophageal perforation caused by a malpositioned feeding tube in a neonate of extremely low birth weight, 632 g. The infant had respiratory distress, which increased rapidly when he was 6 days old. Radiography revealed right-sided hydrothorax that had not been evident a day earlier but no sign of a perforated esophagus. We performed sonography, which revealed fluid in the right pleural cavity and extra-esophageal placement of the feeding tube. Analysis of a fluid specimen obtained on thoracocentesis indicated that the fluid was feeding formula. The feeding tube's misplacement was confirmed sonographically by injecting a small amount of sterile distilled water into the tube and visualizing its entry into the pleural cavity. The feeding tube was removed, and antimicrobial agents were administered. When the infant was 15 days old, feeding resumed through another tube, the placement of which was verified radiographically. The infant was discharged when he was 118 days old with no severe complications, although he had mild chronic lung disease. Because radiography did not reveal the tube's misplacement in this case, we believe that the use of sonography can contribute to an early diagnosis of esophageal perforation in such cases.

Adult↗

Treatment of an esophageal perforation with enteral alimentation and transgastric drainage: case report.

Esophageal perforation with abscess formation has traditionally been approached surgically. A case report of percutaneous drainage of an esophageal perforation is presented. The drainage was performed in conjunction with a percutaneous gastrostomy. One catheter was placed initially in the gastric fundus for drainage and a second catheter was advanced through the gastroesophageal junction, through the perforation, and into the abscess. This management resulted in healing of the abscess cavity and sealing of the perforation.

Abscess↗

Modified exclusion technique for complicated esophageal perforation.

A case of complicated spontaneous esophageal perforation is presented. The control of gastroesophageal reflux by esophageal banding appears to be a crucial factor in healing. Using a modified esophageal exclusion technique without sacrifice of the esophagus proves to be both effective and lifesaving.

Catheterization↗

Nonoperative treatment of 15 benign esophageal perforations with self-expandable covered metal stents.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous or iatrogenic esophageal perforations after endoscopic procedures are potentially life-threatening events with a considerable mortality rate. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that a nonoperative endoscopic treatment with self-expanding metal stents may have a lower morbidity and mortality rate compared with surgical treatment. METHODS: A nonrandomized observational study was conducted with 15 consecutive patients between January 1997 and June 2004. Benign spontaneous and iatrogenic esophageal perforations after endoscopic procedures were treated with self-expandable metal stents. RESULTS: Seven patients (group 1) underwent stent insertion with an average time delay of 45 minutes. In 8 patients (group 2), the median delay was 123 hours. All patients in group 1 had an uneventful recovery and left hospital 5 days (range, 3 to 9) after stent insertion. One patient in group 2 (1 of 8) died of pneumonia after 6 days. In any other cases, perforations healed successfully after stent placement, but the clinical course was generally complicated with sepsis and multiple organ failure. The average hospital stay was 44 days (range, 15 to 70). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate insertion of a self-expandable metal stent enables an excellent outcome with minimal mortality and morbidity without the need for operation. Even in cases of old esophageal perforations, sealing with self-expandable metal stents is still a good option although the clinical course is much less impressive than in early treated perforations.

Adult↗

Unusual cause of esophageal perforation during intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography monitoring for cardiac surgery--a case report.

Although esophageal perforation after transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) examination is rare yet the occurrence of this life-threatening complication is increasing. We report an unusual esophageal perforation occurring 4 days after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and Bentall's procedure. The perforation was due to inadvertent injury of the esophagus that was deformed and distorted by a large calcified lymph node in the mediastinum during intraoperative TEE instrumentation. We suggest that careful preoperative radiological examination of the mediastinum should be done to recognize the anatomical pathology in patient whose routine chest X-ray has disclosed a large calcified lymph node in the mediastinum, if he happens to undergo TEE, so as to avoid disastrous esophageal perforation.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

T-tube intubation in the management of late traumatic esophageal perforations: case report.

Delayed diagnosis of esophageal perforations can lead to high mortality and morbidity and presents a surgical dilemma. A case report of a bullet wound of the esophagus that was diagnosed late is presented. Placement of a biliary T-tube and pleural decortication were carried out after the perforation was found at esophagoscopy. The patient had no fistula nor esophageal narrowing at discharge 31 days after injury.

Adult↗

Esophageal perforation in the neonate: an emerging problem in the newborn nursery.

We report 11 cases of esophageal perforation in the neonate, in whom no surgery was performed for repair of the perforation, nor was any cervical or mediastinal drainage carried out. The perforation was in the cervical esophagus in all cases where an esophagram was performed. Nine were in premature babies (580 to 1,350 g), and two were full-term babies. There were two deaths in small prematures (580 and 935 g), from extreme prematurity and intraventricular hemorrhage, with no morbidity or mortality related to the esophageal perforation. The babies presented as esophageal atresia, or pneumothorax with the feeding tube in the right chest, or an abnormal right upper extrapleural air collection with infiltrate. Barium esophagram showed a classic "double esophagus" configuration. Two babies were mistakenly operated on, one with a diagnosis of esophageal duplication, and one had a gastrostomy for a diagnosis of esophageal atresia. Esophageal perforation in the neonate is an iatrogenic disease that may mimic esophageal atresia, and may be managed without surgical intervention.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

Selective management of iatrogenic esophageal perforation in the newborn.

Since 1974 nine neonates have been treated for iatrogenic esophageal perforation. They ranged in weight from 480 to 3900 g. Four of them had been resuscitated for meconium aspiration, four were being treated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and one had received only routine postpartum suctioning and gastric aspiration. In five infants, esophageal perforation was suspected following traumatic intubation of difficulty in the passage of a catheter or tube. Three neonates passed formula from chest tubes placed for pneumothorax and one child presented with persistent pneumothorax. Esophageal perforation was documented in each case by direct visualization and/or radiographic studies. Three infants were treated with antibiotics and placement of a silastic nasogastric feeding tube. An additional two infants were treated with a silastic tube, antibiotics and chest tube drainage. Four children underwent operation: gastrostomy and drainage (2), gastrostomy and closure of perforation (1), gastrostomy only (1). There were no complications of deaths. Management of iatrogenic perforation of the esophagus depends upon the extent and location of the injury. A nonoperative approach can be successful in those infants with limited injury of short duration. Operation is required in cases with extensive extravasation or delay in diagnosis.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Life-threatening acute posterior mediastinitis due to esophageal perforation.

We analyzed the treatment of a recent group of patients with life-threatening acute posterior mediastinitis due to esophageal perforation to elucidate common factors in successful treatment. Life-threatening acute posterior mediastinitis due to esophageal perforation was diagnosed in 16 patients over the past 12 years. Esophageal perforation resulted from endoscopy in 11 patients, retching in 4, and blunt trauma in 1 patient. Preoperative serum albumin levels were higher in patients who survived. Fourteen of 16 patients (88%) underwent exploration: mediastinal drainage in 14 (10 survived), esophageal repair in 9 (7 survived) with diversion in 3 (3 survived), and stent placement in 2 (1 survived). Six of 16 patients (38%) died, always of polymicrobial sepsis. Female patients and those with cancer, endoscopic perforations, delayed diagnosis, persistent mediastinal contamination, mediastinal suppuration or necrotizing cellulitis, and postoperative complications did poorly. Antibiotics must be effective against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, and against both anaerobic and aerobic bacteria. Early surgical intervention is key, particularly elimination of ongoing mediastinal soilage. Thorough mediastinal debridement and wide mediastinal drainage appear to be important in improving survival of patients with life-threatening acute posterior mediastinitis due to esophageal perforation.

Acute Disease↗

Esophageal perforation. A reassessment of the criteria for choosing medical or surgical therapy.

Treatment for esophageal perforation has traditionally been surgery, but development of more effective antibiotics and parenteral nutrition has led to a cautious trend toward nonoperative management. The goal of this investigation was to identify relevant presenting features that would guide a physician in making the therapeutic choice between medical and surgical therapy. Twenty-five consecutive patients with esophageal perforation--20 iatrogenic and five spontaneous--were reviewed. Treatment was medical in 12 cases and surgical in 13. The findings indicate that many patients with esophageal perforation can be treated medically. The following guidelines are suggested for selecting nonoperative treatment: (1) clinically stable patients; (2) instrumental perforations detected before major mediastinal contamination has occurred or perforations with such a long delay in diagnosis that the patient has already demonstrated tolerance for the perforation without the need for surgery; and (3) esophageal disruptions well contained within the mediastinum or a pleural loculus.

Adult↗

[Mortality from iatrogenic esophageal perforations is high: experience of 54 treated cases].

OBJECTIVE: To underline the severity of instrumental esophageal perforations and to discuss their management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients treated for instrumental esophageal perforation were collected retrospectively from 1980 to 1995 then prospectively since 1995 to 2000. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were treated for instrumental perforations. Perforation occurred after exploratory endoscopy (n = 24), endoscopic dilation (n = 13), attempted tracheal intubation (n = 5), foreign body extraction (n = 5), treatment of esophageal varices (n = 4), trans-esophageal echocardiography (n = 2), and duodenal prosthesis implantation (n = 1). Clinical manifestations were immediate in 18 cases and delayed in all others, with an interval before treatment ranging from 2 hours to 45 days (mean = 70 hours). All patients were operated after large spectrum antibiotherapy and intensive care, except 3 who were treated medically due to their poor general condition. Fourteen (26%) patients died, including the 3 non-operated ones. CONCLUSION: Instrumental esophageal perforations are associated with a high mortality, probably due to the poor general condition of the patients. Diagnosis of these perforations is often delayed. A good experience of endoscopic maneuveurs and adequate post-endoscopic monitoring could allow earlier surgical treatment with lower mortality.

Adult↗

Retrocardiac pneumomediastinum in association with tracheal and esophageal perforations.

Retrocardiac pneumomediastinum was encountered in two premature infants; one had a tracheal perforation and one an esophageal perforation. Contrast studies showed communication between the sites of perforation and the retrocardiac air. Clinical signs suggestive of such perforation include abnormal course of tubes on plain chest films and bloody aspirates.

Esophageal Perforation↗