Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ERCP”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis in a single tertiary referral centre without and with routine prophylaxis with gabexate: a 6-year survey and cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Several drugs have been used for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis with conflicting results and no data referring to the routine use of a pharmacological prophylaxis have been published up to now. Aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis and costs in a series of consecutive patients who have undergone ERCP procedures before and after the introduction of a routine prophylaxis with gabexate in all cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1312 patients who underwent ERCP procedures without gabexate prophylaxis and from 1149 consecutive patients with 1g i.v. gabexate, were retrospectively evaluated during a 6-year period. Patients were also subdivided in standard- and high-risk subjects, on the basis of patient- and technique-related risk factors: 984 subjects (39.9%) had one or more conditions that placed them at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS: Post-ERCP pancreatitis was reported in 76 out of 2461 patients (3.1%). The frequency of pancreatitis appeared significantly reduced in the gabexate period in comparison with before gabexate in overall cases (2.2% versus 3.9%; p=0.019); however, the reduction was significant only for high-risk patients (3.8% versus 7.3%; p=0.001). Severe hyperamylasaemia at 4-6h and 24h after the procedure was also significantly reduced only in high-risk patients (p=0.001). Routine prophylaxis with gabexate appeared cost-effective in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Routine gabexate prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction of post-ERCP pancreatitis rate, severe hyperamylasaemia and hospitalisation-related costs only in high-risk patients. However, gabexate appeared unable to reduce the incidence of severe pancreatitis.

Adolescent↗

Sonographic prediction of a normal or abnormal ERCP in suspected AIDS related sclerosing cholangitis.

AIM: We have assessed the ability of ultrasound to predict an abnormal ERCP examination in patients with suspected AIDS related Sclerosing Cholangitis (ARSC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ultrasound (US) and ERCP findings of fifty patients with clinically suspected AIDS cholangiopathy were reviewed. The diagnosis was suspected due to right upper quadrant pain and cholestatic liver function tests. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients investigated the US findings were normal in 18 (36%). Seventeen of these patients subsequently had a normal ERCP. The other patient showed changes suggestive of mile ARSC. Thirty-two (64%) patients showed a variety of abnormalities on US. Of these, 22 had typical changes of ARSC on ERCP. The remaining 10 patients also had abnormal ERCP examinations. The final diagnosis in these 10 patients included pancreatitis (5), biliary calculi (2), AIDS related lymphoma (2) and acute cholecystitis with an empyema of the gallbladder (1). CONCLUSION: In this study, US is 98% accurate in the prediction of a normal or abnormal ERCP examination, with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100%. This data suggests that ERCP will produce little additional information in these patients if US of the bile ducts is normal.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Therapeutic ERCP in the management of pancreatitis in children.

BACKGROUND: The use of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is increasing in the management of pancreatobiliary diseases in children. METHODS: Over a 32-month period, we performed 34 ERCP procedures for the treatment of pancreatitis in 22 children at two university hospitals. Demographics and clinical data and ERCP findings were documented. Clinical status was assessed 6 months before the first ERCP and 6 months after the last ERCP, according to general condition, severity and frequency of pain, and health care encounters (emergency department visits, clinic visits, and hospital admissions related to the pancreatitis). RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 10.7 years (range 1.5 to 17 years). Abdominal pain was the main presenting symptoms with hyperamylasemia and hyperlipasemia. Clinical diagnoses included acute pancreatitis (6), recurrent pancreatitis (5), and chronic pancreatitis (11). The mean follow-up was 16.4 months. Nine patients had sphincter manometry, with abnormal results leading to biliary sphincterotomy in 4. Fifteen patients underwent a total of 23 therapeutic ERCP procedures unrelated to sphincter dysfunction. There were 2 complications of 34 procedures (6%), both being mild pancreatitis after sphincter manometry. There were no deaths. There was a significant reduction in frequency (p < 0.01) and severity of pain (p < 0.01) after intervention. Patients without pancreatographic changes of chronic pancreatitis had the most marked clinical improvement (p < 0.05). In those with ductal changes of chronic pancreatitis, clinical improvement was not predicted by the extent of ductal changes. There was a significant decrease in health care encounters (p < 0.05) and improvement in general condition (p < 0.01) after endoscopic therapy, especially in those with a normal pancreatogram. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic ERCP is safe in pediatric patients with pancreatitis. Significant clinical improvement is achieved in patients with biliary or pancreatic stone disease. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the impact of endoscopic therapy in patients with chronic pancreatitis and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Acute Disease↗

ERCP in patients with long-limb Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and intact papilla.

BACKGROUND: ERCP by means of long-limb Roux-en-Y surgical anastomoses has been reported primarily in patients with biliary or pancreatic anastamoses, but rarely in patients with an intact papilla. METHODS: All ERCP procedures attempted over a 6-year interval in patients with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomies and an intact papilla were reviewed. Patients with a prior Billroth II operation or alteration of the major papilla were excluded. Cannulation and therapy were primarily performed with a duodenoscope after exploration and placement of a guidewire in the afferent limb with a forward-viewing colonoscope. In some cases the duodenoscope was pulled into the afferent limb with a wire-guided balloon passed retrograde into the afferent limb. A follow-up of 30 days was obtained for all patients as part of a prospective ERCP outcome study. RESULTS: Of 15 patients in whom ERCP was attempted, the papilla was reached in 10 patients (67%), the bile duct being accessed in all 10. Needle-knife precut papillotomy after placement of a pancreatic duct stent was performed in 3 patients. Biliary sphincterotomy with a variety of techniques was successful in all 9 patients in whom it was attempted. Other maneuvers included stone extraction, sphincter of Oddi manometry, and biliary stent placement. Final diagnoses were sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (6), malignant biliary stricture (2), choledocholithiasis plus tumor (1), and choledocholithiasis (1). Complications occurred after 3 (12%) of 25 ERCP procedures including pancreatitis (1 mild, 1 moderate) and bleeding (1 mild), all in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP was ultimately successful in two thirds of patients with long-limb gastrojejunostomies and an intact papilla. The success of the ERCP is determined primarily by ability to advance a duodenoscope through the afferent limb. Once the major papilla was accessed with a duodenoscope, advanced biliary and pancreatic therapeutic techniques were feasible.

Adult↗

The effect of lidocaine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla on the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis remains a serious cause of ERCP-related morbidity. Topical application of lidocaine reportedly blunts cholecystokinin release from intestinal mucosa and reduces sphincter of Oddi spasm. A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of lidocaine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla on the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Secondary outcomes evaluated were ease of cannulation and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. METHODS: Patients undergoing ERCP were randomized in blocks of 6 to have 10 mL of either 1% lidocaine or normal saline solution sprayed on the major papilla before cannulation. Patients were observed for the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Patient history- and procedure-related variables were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were enrolled, of whom 32 were excluded after randomization but before analysis. Of patients analyzed, 145 were randomized to treatment with lidocaine and 149 to placebo. No patient was lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference noted in patient history- or procedure-related variables. Seven patients in the lidocaine group and 5 in the placebo group developed post-ERCP pancreatitis (p=0.73). Ease of cannulation did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine sprayed on the major papilla does not decrease the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Administration, Topical↗

A direct comparison of ERCP teaching models.

BACKGROUND: Several teaching models for ERCP are now available. Live, anesthetized porcine models have been used for many years, but harvested porcine organ preparations have recently been developed, and computer-based endoscopy simulators now incorporate ERCP modules. Each has proven to be a useful educational modality, but there is no direct comparison among these models. This study compared the performance of these 3 ERCP teaching models. METHODS: Twenty endoscopists used each ERCP training model (computer simulator, harvested porcine organ, live anesthetized pig) and then completed a survey grading the realism and performance of each model compared with performance of ERCP in patients. A rank order was established for the models relative to their realism, educational utility, ease of use, and ease of incorporation into a training program. RESULTS: The harvested porcine organ model scored highest on indices of realism, usefulness, and performance, although this reached statistical significance only for "ease of use" (p < 0.05). Conversely, the computer simulator scored significantly lower in most realism scores, although it was felt to be the one model most easily incorporated into a training program. CONCLUSIONS: Although each ERCP teaching model has proven to be a useful training modality, the harvested porcine organ model was felt to be the most realistic as well as the most favorable model for instruction in both basic and advanced ERCP.

Adult↗

Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP.

BACKGROUND: A target-controlled infusion system automatically adjusts the rate of infusion of propofol to maintain a desired (target) concentration. The aim of this study was to determine whether administration of propofol with a target-controlled infusion system could improve the sedation of patients undergoing ERCP. METHODS: A total of 205 consecutive patients undergoing ERCP were sedated by using a propofol target-controlled infusion system by an anesthesiologist. The target plasma concentration of propofol ranged from 2 to 5 microg/mL. A bolus dose of fentanyl (50-100 mcg) was administered if signs of insufficient analgesia were observed at the maximum target concentration of propofol allowed. The technical difficulty of ERCP was graded on a scale from 1 (least difficult) to 5 (most difficult). RESULTS: The mean dosages of propofol and fentanyl administered were 465 (245) mg and 59 (23) mcg, respectively. The total dose of propofol administered and the mean duration of ERCP were related to the degree of difficulty of the procedure. No severe complication was observed; mean time to discharge was 31 (12) minutes. Time to discharge was not influenced by the difficulty of ERCP or by the total dose of propofol administered. CONCLUSIONS: A target-controlled infusion system for administration of propofol provides safe and effective sedation during ERCP. Further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness and the safety profile for infusion of propofol with a target-controlled infusion system by a nonanesthesiologist during ERCP.

Adult↗

Endoscopic sphincterotomy by using pure-cut electrosurgical current and the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the use of pure-cut electrosurgical current for endoscopic sphincterotomy may reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to determine whether pure-cut current reduces the risk of pancreatitis compared with blend current. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo sphincterotomy over a non-conductive guidewire with 30 W/sec pure-cut current or 30 W/sec blend-2 current by a blinded endoscopist. Serum amylase and lipase levels were determined 1 day before and within 24 hours after ERCP. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was the primary outcome of interest. Secondary outcomes were as follows: severity of immediate bleeding, as graded by a 3-point scale from 1 (no bleeding) to 3 (injection or balloon tamponade therapy required to stop bleeding) and evidence of delayed bleeding 24 hours after ERCP. Analyses were performed in intention-to-treat fashion. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were randomized (116 pure-cut current, 130 blend current). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The overall frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 6.9%, with no significant difference in frequency between treatment arms (pure cut, 7.8% vs. blend, 6.1%; p = 0.62). The difference in rates of pancreatitis between the two groups was 1.7%: 95% CI[-4.8%, 8.2%]. Six patients (2.4%) had delayed bleeding after ERCP, of which two required transfusion. There was a significant increase in minor bleeding episodes (grade 2) in the pure-cut group (p < 0.0001). Delayed episodes of bleeding were equal (n = 3) in each arm. CONCLUSIONS: The type of current used when performing endoscopic sphincterotomy does not appear to alter the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The selection of electrosurgical current for biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy should be based on endoscopist preference.

Adult↗

Complications of ERCP: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Studies of ERCP-related morbidity seldom include a sufficient patient follow-up. The aim of this study was to characterize and to evaluate the frequency of complications, cardiopulmonary untoward events in particular. METHODS: All patients undergoing ERCP during a 2-year period were included in this prospective study. Complications were assessed at the time of ERCP and by postal/telephone contact at 30-days after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1177 ERCPs were included in the analysis, of which 56.2% were therapeutic. The 30-day complication rate was 15.9%; the procedure-related mortality rate was 1.0%. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 3.8% of patients (3 deaths). Hemorrhage or perforation occurred with 0.9% and 1.1%, respectively, of the procedures (3 deaths). One perforation that resulted in the death of the patient occurred after placement of an endoprosthesis. Cholangitis occurred in relation to 5% of the ERCP procedures (3 deaths). Cardiorespiratory complications occurred in 2.3% (2 deaths). Dilated bile duct ( p = 0.0001), placement of stent ( p = 0.001), and use of more than 40 mg of hyoscine-N-butyl bromide ( p < 0.05) were risk factors for complications by multivariate analysis. Risk of pancreatitis was increased with age under 40 years ( p = 0.0078), placement of stent ( p = 0.031), and a dilated bile duct ( p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study confirms that the complication rate of ERCP including therapeutic procedures is high. Cardiopulmonary complications were not as common as expected, despite being the special focus of the study.

Adolescent↗

ERCP subsequent to retroperitoneal perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy.

BACKGROUND: Perforation occurs after endoscopic sphincterotomy in 0.4% of cases. With recognition of a perforation, the procedure usually is aborted and further attempts at ERCP are thought to be precluded by the complication. The aim of this study was to determine the timing and the outcome of ERCP after retroperitoneal perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy when the initial ERCP was incomplete. METHODS: A total of 1787 patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy during a period of 29 months. A type II duodenal perforation was recognized in 15 patients, whereupon the ERCP, including further intervention, was halted. Eight patients agreed to undergo a second therapeutic ERCP to complete the treatment of the primary disease. OBSERVATIONS: Therapeutic ERCP was repeated in all patients from 11 to 15 days after the perforation. Treatment was successfully completed in all patients without complication. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic ERCP may be repeated and has a high success rate in patients who sustain a perforation caused by endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Abdominal Injuries↗

Intravenous N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis remains the most common complication of ERCP. Prophylactic administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) probably decreases the incidence and the severity of experimental pancreatitis. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of intravenous NAC for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in humans, who represent an appropriate model to study the potential role of NAC in this setting. METHODS: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 256 patients who underwent ERCP. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous NAC at a loading dose of 70 mg/kg 2 hours before and 35 mg/kg at 4-hour intervals for a total of 24 hours after the procedure, or to receive normal saline solution as placebo. Patients were clinically evaluated, and serum amylase levels were measured before and 6 hours and 24 hours after the procedure. Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and to grade the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were included in the analysis. The two groups were matched for age, gender, underlying disease and indication for treatment, ERCP findings, and type of treatment. The overall incidence of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis was 10.8%, with 12.1% in the NAC group and 9.6% in the placebo group. There were no statistical differences in the incidence or severity grades between the groups. The mean duration of hospitalization for pancreatitis also was similar in the NAC group and the placebo group (3.6 +/- 0.9 and 3 +/- 1.5 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial show the absence of any beneficial effect of NAC on the incidence and the severity of ERCP-induced pancreatitis.

Adult↗

Success and yield of second attempt ERCP.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been shown to be an accurate and reliable method to evaluate biliary and pancreatic disorders. When an attempt to perform ERCP fails, the managing physician must decide whether to repeat the procedure or rely on other alternatives. We tallied the data from 113 patients referred to our institution for repeat ERCP after a failed attempt at another hospital. This group represented approximately 5% of the total population studied during that period of time. All of the patients had undergone one or more unsuccessful ERCP(s) and were referred to our center for another attempt at ERCP. Using a variety of techniques, we were successful in cannulating the desired duct in 96% of attempts. Pathologic findings were present in 64% of cases, of which 22% were sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Thus, second attempt ERCP is generally worthwhile if clinically indicated and ERCP expertise is geographically available.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

The role of ERCP in biliary atresia.

BACKGROUND: It is not easy to discriminate between infantile hepatitis and biliary atresia in spite of several diagnostic tests including laboratory analyses, ultrasound, and hepatobiliary scans. ERCP is the most useful procedure for visualization of the extrahepatic biliary system, but ERCP is still an uncommon procedure in children. METHODS: ERCP examination was performed in 52 infants with biliary atresia (10 with infantile hepatitis, 5 with congenital biliary dilatation, 3 with paucity of intrahepatic bile duct, 2 with duodenal atresia, and 1 with postoperative jaundice of hepatoblastoma) aged from 8 days to 300 days (mean, 71 days). RESULTS: ERCP was successful in 47 with biliary atresia, in 9 with infantile hepatitis, and 10 with another disease. Liver biopsy was performed in 1 infant with hepatitis in whom the cannulation failed; in 9 with hepatitis in whom the cannulation was successful, exploratory laparotomy could be avoided. The ERCP findings in 46 patients with biliary atresia (excluding 1 in whom evaluation could not be performed because of poor x-ray quality) were classified into four patterns. CONCLUSIONS: A success rate of ERCP examinations in infants was 88%, so ERCP is recommended to make a correct decision regarding the need for surgery in cholestatic disorders.

Biliary Atresia↗

Success of repeat ERCP by the same endoscopist.

BACKGROUND: The success rate of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by the same endoscopist after a failed initial attempt is unknown. It has been suggested that a repeat examination at a tertiary referral center be performed after an unsuccessful attempt. Our aim was to determine the success rate of repeat ERCP at a different endoscopic session by the same endoscopist and the outcomes among patients with a failed index procedure. METHODS: A review of 500 consecutive ERCP procedures was performed at a teaching institution. RESULTS: The overall initial success rate for cannulation of the duct of interest was 90.8% at index endoscopy. Endoscopy was repeated after 51% unsuccessful procedures, and access to the desired duct was achieved in 87.5% of repeat attempts. A needle knife was used in 21% instances, and its use facilitated cannulation of the duct of interest in 80%. No complications occurred with repeat ERCP. Of the 3 patients who underwent failed repeated ERCP, 1 was not available for the follow-up study, 1 had metastatic cancer, and the other had pancreas divisum. The outcomes among patients who did not undergo repeat ERCP included malignant disease diagnosed with other imaging techniques (35% of patients) and no further admissions or emergency room visits for suspected pancreaticobiliary symptoms (39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat ERCP by the same endoscopist yields an 87.5% success rate. This leads to an overall success rate of 95%.

Bile Duct Diseases↗

[Cost effectiveness study on the use of somatostatin for reduction of acute pancreatitis after ERCP].

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies show that intravenous injection of somatostatin before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with a significant reduction in the rate of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. The lack of data in our environment led us to study the possible economic benefits of somatostatin administration, obtained through the reduction of costs due to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Theoretical study of the direct costs of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis using Markov's tree decisions. The costs of the group pre-treated with intravenous administration of 3 mg of somatostatin were compared with those of the control group. Post-ERCP rates of pancreatitis of 10% were accepted in the control group and rates of 3% were accepted in the somatostatin group. The costs of the different types of pancreatitis were as follows: costs with and without complications and with surgical intervention were based on the diagnosis related group-weights applied by the Ministry of Health in the Contract-program of the Health Service of Navarre for 1999. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis from which an economic benefit would be obtained in the group pre-treated with somatostatin. RESULTS: Mean theoretical cost per procedure was 121,640 pesetas for the control group and 105,539 for the group pre-treated with somatostatin. Saving per patient was 13.26% (16,101 pesetas). The sensitivity analysis revealed that in the control group premedication produced an economic benefit starting from a pancreatitis rate of 4.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Independently of the clinical benefit signifying the reduction of post-ERCP pancreatitis, somatostatin administration led to a saving of 16,101 pesetas per patient. Accepting that the pancreatitis rate in the treated group was proportionately reduced, the sensitivity analysis showed that premedication produced an economic benefit starting from a pancreatitis rate of 4.2% in the control group.

Acute Disease↗

Antibiotic prophylaxis for ERCP: a comparison of oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous cephazolin in the prophylaxis of high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Cholangitis and septicaemia are serious complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). They occur mainly following therapeutic ERCP in the setting of an obstructed biliary system. The optimum prophylactic antibiotic regimen in such patients is not yet defined but usually depends on intravenous agents. AIM: To compare the efficacy of oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous cephazolin. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients at high risk from septic complications were randomized prospectively to either oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg b.d.) or intravenous cephazolin (1 g b.d.), commenced at least 90 min prior to the ERCP and continued for 3 days. Bacteriological cultures were taken from bile during the procedure and from blood both immediately and at 24 h post-procedure. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the pre-ERCP clinical or radiological findings or in the types of procedure performed. One patient did not undergo an ERCP and was excluded from the final analysis. Of the 77 patients in the ciprofloxacin group there were no positive blood cultures and one positive culture from a nasobiliary drain. Two out of the 72 cephazolin patients had positive blood cultures immediately post-ERCP; one of these two patients and one other cephazolin patient had positive bile cultures. There were no cases of cholangitis or septicaemia in the ciprofloxacin group and three cases in the cephazolin group. One patient from each treatment group died within the 7-day study. Adverse drug reactions were minimal and none of the different clinical outcomes in the two groups reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Oral ciprofloxacin is a cost-effective prophylactic agent for high-risk ERCP.

Administration, Oral↗

Provision of ERCP services and training in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A rising demand for hands-on training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has coincided with a need for increased scrutiny of outcomes (clinical governance) and the development of less invasive methods of pancreaticobiliary imaging. We surveyed the current provision of ERCP facilities and training throughout the United Kingdom. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to senior endoscopists in 252 acute hospitals and to 500 trainees in gastroenterology. RESULTS: Completed forms were returned from 180 hospitals (a 71% response rate) and from 233 trainees (a 47% response rate). A median of 210 ERCPs per year are carried out at each centre (range 40-1000), under the supervision of 345 senior endoscopists. ERCP training had been started by 163 trainees (70%), of whom 42 (26%) had been given one or fewer procedures to start per week. Trainees rated their training as excellent (25%), good (28%), adequate (24%) or inadequate (22%); 193 (83%) perceived that they needed training in ERCP to ensure that future career opportunities were not denied to them. CONCLUSIONS: Some centres have insufficient capacity for training in ERCP. Some form of preselection for both trainers and trainees may be required to ensure that quality is maintained. Gastroenterology training programmes should move away from encouraging all trainees to learn ERCP, and should promote the acquisition of alternative skills.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

Urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip in detecting ERCP-induced pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: We have evaluated a new urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip, based on the principle of immunochromatography, in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis induced by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred six consecutive patients undergoing ERCP (with opacification of the pancreatic duct) at the Helsinki University Central Hospital were included in the study. Patients were tested with a urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip six hours after ERCP. Quantitative trypsinogen-2 as well as serum and urine amylase values were measured before the procedure and six hours after it. RESULTS: In patients developing pancreatitis after ERCP, the median urinary trypsinogen-2 concentration six hours after the endoscopic procedure was 1780 micrograms/l (range 29-10,700 micrograms/l), and in patients without pancreatitis the median concentration was 3.6 micrograms/l (range 0.1-3390 micrograms/l; P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity figures for the urinary trypsinogen-2 test strip results in diagnosing post-ERCP pancreatitis were comparable (81% and 97%, respectively) to those for serum amylase (91% and 96%) and urine amylase measurements (81% and 95%). The test strip showed a good correlation (kappa = 0.75) with the quantitative trypsinogen-2 assay. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in urinary trypsinogen-2 concentration after ERCP reflects pancreatic injury, and can be detected by the test strip. Patients should be tested before the ERCP procedure as well, since elevated baseline values occur. The test is reliable and easy to perform even on an outpatient basis. However, its clinical usefulness requires evaluation in further trials.

Acute Disease↗