Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ERAD”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Can Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens be shortened in clinical practice? An open-label, randomized, pilot study of 4 and 7-day triple therapy with rabeprazole, high-dose levofloxacin, and tinidazole.

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor which is particularly suitable for use in short-term Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment. Levofloxacin-based H. pylori eradication regimens have shown good efficacy and very few side effects. Shorter treatment and absence of significant side effects should improve compliance to therapy and increase the Hp H. pylori eradication rate. AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of 2 rabeprazole-based H. pylori eradication regimens in an open-label, randomized study carried out in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: One hundred sixty-nine consecutive, treatment-naive patients with H. pylori infection were randomized to receive rabeprazole (20 mg, bid), levofloxacin (500 mg, bid), and tinidazole (500 mg, bid) for either 4 [4-d rabeprazole, levofloxacin, tinidazole (RLT), n=85] or 7 days (7-d RLT, n=84). Before treatment, all patients underwent upper digestive endoscopy. Cure rates were assessed by means of C-urea breath test. and were compared with the eradication rate obtained with standard triple therapy in our Unit (ie, 78%) and average eradication rate reported in the literature (ie, 79%). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat eradication rates were 94% [87% to 98%, 95% confidence interval (CI)] and 95% (88% to 99%, 95% CI) in the 4-day RLT and 7-day RLT regimens, respectively, whereas per-protocol eradication rates were 95% (88% to 99%, 95% CI) in the 4-day RLT and 96% (90% to 99%, 95% CI) in the 7-day RLT. Both treatment regimens obtained significantly higher eradication rates as compared with standard triple therapy. The 4-day RLT showed significantly fewer side effects. CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical practice setting, both 4-day and 7-day rabeprazole, high-dose levofloxacin, tinidazole-based regimens achieved relevant H. pylori eradication rates in treatment-naive patients. The lower number of side effects makes the shorter treatment regimen preferable over the conventional 7-day treatment.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on gastric ulcer healing after endoscopic mucosal resection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It remains unclear whether Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy accelerates the healing of acute gastric ulcer after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of gastric tumor. We examined the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on ulcer healing after EMR. METHODS: Twenty-six patients who underwent successful H. pylori eradication therapy before EMR were followed prospectively. Patients underwent endoscopic examination 1 or 2 months after EMR, during which the ulcer status and reduction rate were assessed. The effect of H. pylori eradication on the quality of ulcer healing was also evaluated. Six patients in whom eradication therapy failed and 26 patients who underwent EMR without eradication therapy served as control subjects. RESULTS: Endoscopically, 18 (75%) of 24 ulcers in the eradication group were at the healing stage 1 month after EMR. The ulcer reduction rates were 85.0 +/- 2.6% and 96. 9 +/- 1.1% at 1 and 2 months after EMR, respectively. Ulcer stage and reduction rate did not differ significantly between the eradication group and control group. However, we frequently observed a better quality of ulcer healing in the eradication group than in the control groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication therapy does not accelerate ulcer healing after EMR but may improve the quality of ulcer healing of gastric ulcer after EMR.

Aged↗

Effect of early eradication on Helicobacter pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis in Mongolian gerbils.

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection and gastric carcinogenesis are known to have a close relationship, but the effect of eradication of Hp on Hp-related gastric carcinogenesis has not been fully studied experimentally. To evaluate the effect of eradication in gastric carcinogenesis, an experimental model with eradication in the early, middle or late period was studied using Hp-infected and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-treated Mongolian gerbils. The animals were divided into seven groups: group A (MNU + Hp + eradication at 15 w), group B (MNU + Hp + eradication at 35 w), group C (MNU + Hp + eradication at 55 w), group D (MNU + Hp), group E (MNU), group F (Hp) and group G (control). The tumor incidences at week 75 in the early (group A), middle (group B) and late (group C) eradicated groups were 6.7%, 27.3% and 38.2%, respectively. The incidence of 56.3% in the non-eradicated group was the highest (group D). Incidences in group E, group F and group G were 6.3%, 0.0% and 0.0%, respectively. The tumor incidences were related to the period of inflammatory status induced by Hp infection. Hp infection strongly enhanced gastric carcinogenesis initiated with a chemical carcinogen, and following eradication at an early period this enhancing effect was effectively reduced. Eradication at an early stage of inflammation might be effective in preventing Hp-related gastric carcinogenesis.

Animals↗

Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication among adults with intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND: Compared to the general population, Helicobacter pylori infection is more common among adults with intellectual disability (ID) and is associated with greater levels of disability, maladaptive behaviour, and institutionalization. Little information exists about the effects of eradication therapy in this group, so we aimed to evaluate: (1) success of a standard H. pylori eradication protocol; (2) frequency of side-effects; and (3) impact of eradication on level of functional ability and maladaptive behaviour. METHOD: A cohort of adults with ID underwent assessment of their levels of function and maladaptive behaviour, medical history, physical examination, and H. pylori testing using serology and faecal antigen tests. Some received standard H. pylori eradication therapy. Twelve months later, participants underwent repeat assessment, were grouped by change in H. pylori status and compared. RESULTS: Of 168 participants, 117 (70%) were currently infected with H. pylori at baseline, and 96 (82%) of the 117 were given standard H. pylori eradication therapy. The overall eradication rate was 61% but 31% reported side-effects. Institutional status of the participants, their level of behaviour or function, and number of comorbid medical conditions were not associated with failure of eradication. There were no statistically significant differences in level of behaviour or function, ferritin, or weight between the groups in whom H. pylori was eradicated or stayed positive. CONCLUSION: Adults with ID have lower H. pylori eradication and higher side-effect rates than the general population. Levels of maladaptive behaviour and disability did not improve with eradication and thus greater levels of maladaptive behaviour or disability appear to be risk factors for, rather than consequences of, H. pylori infection.

Adult↗

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura-a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori was reported to increase the platelet counts in some H. pylori-positive patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (cITP). However, the efficacy of the eradication was quite different according to the previous reports. To determine whether H. pylori infection can contribute to cITP, we performed a randomized controlled trial for the first time. In addition, to investigate the possible pathogenic mechanisms and to predict the platelet response after eradication of H. pylori in each cITP patient, several H. pylori virulence factors, the urease activities of the infected H. pylori strains, and the titers of anti-CagA IgG antibodies were analyzed. METHODS: Patients with cITP underwent gastroscopy and gastric H. pylori infection was confirmed by culture. H. pylori-positive cITP patients were randomly assigned to either the eradication or the non-eradication group. The eradication group received a standard antibiotic therapy for H. pylori. Response to treatment was defined as complete (CR) if the platelet count was above 150x10(3)/microl and partial (PR) if the platelet count increased by more than 50x10(3)/microl above the pretreatment count. The virulence factors were investigated by PCR and PCR-based direct sequencing. Anti-CagA IgG antibody titer of each patient's serum was measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Of the 36 ITP patients, 25 (69.4%) were positive for H. pylori and eradication was achieved in 84.6% of these patients. The platelet response was significantly different between the eradication group (46.2%) and the non-eradication group (0%). No significant differences were found in clinical factors between the responders and the nonresponders. H. pylori virulence factors and the urease activity were not associated with the response. The titers of anti-CagA antibodies in the responders were significantly higher than those in the nonresponders (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication treatment is a favorable therapeutic option for H. pylori-positive patients with cITP. Moreover, an ELISA titer of serum anti-CagA antibody may be a good predictor of platelet recovery, and immunological reaction between platelet and anti-CagA antibodies may have some relation to the pathogenesis of H. pylori-positive patients with cITP.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Helicobacter pylori eradication with dual and low-dose triple therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few data exist on the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in cirrhotic patients. In this study we assessed the efficacy of standard dual and one-week low-dose triple therapy on Helicobacter pylori eradication in cirrhotics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 83 cirrhotic patients with epigastric pain were randomised to receive either a two-week course of dual therapy, composed of omeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. (n = 41) or a one-week course of triple therapy, composed of omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., and tetracycline 500 mg b.d (n = 42). Helicobacter pylori infection at entry and eradication 6-8 weeks after the end of therapy were assessed by rapid urease test and histology on biopsies from the antrum and corpus. When eradication did not occur with either dual or triple therapy, patients were given the alternative regimen. Helicobacter pylori eradication in these patients was assessed 6-8 weeks after the end of treatment by a further endoscopy. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 87.8% (36 out of 41; 95% confidence interval 77.8-97.8%) of patients after dual therapy and in 85.7% (36 out of 42; 95% confidence interval 75.1-96.3%) of patients treated with triple therapy (p = NS). In patients in whom initial eradication was unsuccessful, re-treatment eradicated Helicobacter pylori in 4 out of 5 patients given the triple regimen and in all 5 patients who received the dual therapy. One patient was lost to follow-up. No major side-effects were reported for either treatment regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that both dual and triple therapies are effective in Helicobacter pylori eradication in cirrhotics as well as in eradication failure patients. Therefore, the use of the dual therapy regimen is strongly suggested as an initial treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in cirrhotic patients.

Amoxicillin↗

[Helicobacter pylori eradication. Therapeutic evolution, value of complementary studies].

INDICATIONS: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori is needed for patients with a gastroduodenal ulcer associated with H. pylori gastritis. Eradication modifies the natural history of the disease and greatly reduces the risk of recurrence. Eradication is also indicated for patients with MALT lymphoma with a low degree of malignancy. Systematic eradication of H. pylori would not be necessary for patients with dyspepsia associated with H. pylori gastritis since a beneficial effect is achieved in only 5% of the treated patients. Systematic eradication in order to reduce the incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma is not recommended. DIAGNOSIS: Direct tests (urease, pathology) provide the diagnosis of H. pylori gastritis. Indirect tests (13C-labeled urea respiratory test) can be most useful to determine the efficacy of eradication treatments. THERAPY: A tri-therapy regimen given for 7 days combining a double-dosed proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin (2 g/d), and clarithromycin (0.5 g b.i.d) is used to eradicate H. pylori. With this regimen, the mean rate of eradication achieved in France is 67%. The principal causes of failure are poor compliance and bacterial resistance to clarithromycin. Metronidazole (1 g/d) can be used for patients allergic to penicillin. A second cycle can be prescribed in case of failure, substituting metronidazole for clarithromycin. FOLLOW-UP: Eradication treatment is prescribed for patients with an ulcer after confirmation of infection by one or two direct tests. Treatment efficacy can be assessed by the respiratory test for patients with a duodenal ulcer but is not systematically needed. Biopsy of a gastric ulcer can also provide an assessment of treatment efficacy. For patients with a non-complicated duodenal ulcer, antisecretion treatment is not required in addition to eradication treatment.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Long-term follow-up of gastric metaplasia after eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: There is no commonly accepted view concerning changes in gastric metaplasia after the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term course of gastric metaplasia after the eradication of this bacterium. METHODS: The subjects were 59 patients with duodenal ulcer who were positive for Helicobacter pylori. Forty patients were classified as the eradication group. Gastric metaplasia was endoscopically and histologically evaluated before and after eradication of this bacterium. The follow-up period was 2-7.1 years. In the other 19 patients in the non-eradication group, gastric metaplasia was evaluated before and after treatment of the ulcer. Gastric metaplasia was evaluated in terms of its extent and type in all patients. RESULTS: Gastric metaplasia showed the incomplete type before eradication but changed to the complete type after eradication, which persisted for a long period. The extent of gastric metaplasia increased after eradication. In the non-eradication group, gastric metaplasia infrequently changed to the complete type during the scarring period of ulcer. CONCLUSION: Gastric metaplasia changed to the complete type after the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, which persisted for a long period.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

[Current status of treatment for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in the Hokkaido area (evaluation of Helicobacter pylori eradication)].

Treatment guidelines for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) have been changed recently due to the clinical application of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication but there has been no detailed multi-center analysis of the hematological effects of H. pylori eradication. The Clinical Hematology Forum consists of 11 large hematological departments and divisions in the Hokkaido area. We sent questionnaires to these 11 hematological departments and divisions in March 2003 to obtain information on current treatment strategies for patients with ITP and hematological results after the eradication of H. pylori. Questionnaires were returned by 9 (81.8%) of the 11 departments. Doctors in all hospitals had experience in diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection. Diagnostic examinations for H. pylori infection were performed in 54.3% of the registered cases. H. pylori infection was detected in 68.1% of the examined cases, and eradication treatment was performed in 87.7% of H. pylori-positive patients. H. pylori was eradicated in 52 (83.9%) of the 62 patients in whom the results of treatment could be evaluated. Among the patients whose platelet counts were less than 10.0 x 10(4)/microl, platelet recovery was observed in 48.8% of cases with successful eradication, a percentage similar to previously reported percentages in Japan. There was no prognostic factor to predict good responders before eradication treatment. Since the side effects of eradication treatment, including gastrointestinal symptoms and skin eruptions, were not serious, this method might become a front-line treatment for patients with ITP. Patient selection for eradication as an up-front treatment, analysis of the pathophysiology of platelet recovery after eradication and long-term effects should be investigated to make new treatment guidelines for newly diagnosed patients with ITP.

Adolescent↗

[Levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication].

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antibiotic resistance and poor compliance are the main causes of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure. This study evaluated the eradication rate, tolerability, and compliance of levofloxacin- azithromycin combined triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: 1) First-line eradication: A total of 78 H. pylori-positive patients were enrolled. Seventeen military men in Armed Forces Capital Hospital were treated with 7 days of levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, levofloxacin 500 mg od, and azithromycin 500 mg od), and 61 patients in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital were treated with standard PPI-based triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1.0 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid) for 7 days. 2) Second-line eradication: A consecutive series of 59 patients who failed H. pylori eradication with standard PPI-based triple therapy in Kangbuk Samsung Hospital were randomized to two groups. Thirty patients were retreated with 7 days of bismuth-based quadruple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth 120 mg qid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, and tetracycline 500 mg qid), and remaining 29 patients were retreated with levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy. Patient's compliance and tolerability were evaluated at the end of treatment. The status of H. pylori infection was assessed 8 weeks later then. The successful eradication of H. pylori was defined as negative results from histology and CLO test, or 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: First-line eradication rate of levofloxacin-azithromycin triple therapy was lower than that of standard PPI-based triple therapy, but there was no statistically significant difference (70.6% vs. 80.3%, p=0.390). Second-line eradication rate of levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy was significantly lower than that of bismuth-based quadruple therapy (ITT/PP 65.5%/73.1% vs. 90%/90%, p<0.0001). The compliances of all patients were more than 85%. Two of patients with levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy complained self-limiting side effects (mild dizziness; mild insomnia with general weakness). CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin-azithromycin combined triple therapy should not be recommended as the first-line or second-line H. pylori eradication regimen in Korea.

Adult↗

[Clinical factors that predicts successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori].

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antibiotic resistance and compliance are regarded to be important which affect the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). However, it is not easy to apply the antibiotic resistance test in clinical field. We investigated other clinical factors predicting the successful eradication of H. pylori. METHODS: From January 2004 to March 2005, 195 patients with documented H. pylori infection received proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy for one week and were assessed for the underlying chronic illnesses, smoking, alcohol habit, therapeutic indication and compliance. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were 69.2%, while per protocol (PP) analysis with 169 patients showed an initial eradication rate of 79.9%. The eradication rates of H. pylori according to the underlying disease were 73.9% (17/23) in diabetes, 66.7% (18/27) in hypertension, 66.7% (2/3) in renal disease, 100% (9/9) in liver disease, 63.7% (7/11) in cardiovascular disease and 64.3% (9/14) in chronic NSAIDs user. There was no statistical difference in the eradication rates according to the therapeutic indication, underlying disease, sex, age, smoking, alcohol, and PPI. However, the eradication rate was statistically lower in patients with multiple underlying diseases. Eradication rate was significantly higher in patients with good compliance than in those with poor compliance in taking medications (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Underlying chronic disease does not affect the H. pylori eradication rate significantly. In clinical practice, apart from antibiotic resistance test, drug compliance is the most important factor affecting the H. pylori eradication rate.

Adult↗

[Effectiveness of triple therapy to eradicate H. pylori in patients after failed therapy with omeprazole/amoxicillin].

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates with omeperazole/amoxicillin range from 0-90%. The best regimen for retreatment after failure of omeprazole/amoxicillin has not been established so far. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy with bismuth, tetracycline and ornidazole in eradicating H. pylori after failure of omeprazole/amoxicillin. 79 duodenal ulcer patients with H. pylori infection were treated with oral omeprazole (40 mg bid) and amoxicillin solute (750 mg tid) for 10 days. Eradication rate was 28/79 (35%) and was distinctly lower in smokers (> 10 cigarettes/day) vs nonsmokers (10/49 [20%] vs 18/30 [60%], p < 0.001). 37 patients with persistent H. pylori infection in whom omeprazole/amoxicillin had failed agreed to retreatment with triple therapy. Persistence of H. pylori was confirmed by histology (3 antral and 2 gastric body biopsies; H&E, Giemsa), urease test (CLO) and/or H. pylori culture. Patients smoking > 10 cigarettes/day were classified as smokers. Retreatment consisted of oral bismuth-subcitrate 4 x 120 mg/d for 28 days (day 1-28), tetracycline 4 x 500 mg/d and ornidazole 3 x 500 mg/d for 10 days (day 1-10). Control endoscopy was done 30 days after the end of treatment. Criteria for H. pylori eradication was negative urease test, culture and histology. 34/37 patients (6 females/28 males; 39 [23-64] years) completed the study (24/34 smokers, 10/34 nonsmokers). 3/37 patients dropped out because of side effects (n = 1) or incompliance (n = 2). H. pylori subcultures for resistance testing were possible in 32/34 patients: H. pylori was metronidazole-sensitive in 11/32 (1 female, 10 males; 38 [24-55] years; 9 smokers, 2 nonsmokers) and metronidazole-resistant (minimal inhibitory concentration for metronidazole > 8 mg/ml) in 21/32 (5 females, 16 males; 40 [23-64] years; 13 smokers, 8 nonsmokers). The overall H. pylori eradication rate of the triple therapy was 27/34 (79%). H. pylori was eradicated in 19/24 (79%) smokers and in 8/10 (80%) nonsmokers. Eradication rate for metronidazole-sensitive H. pylori was 11/11 (100%) vs 14/21 (67%) for metronidazole-resistant H. pylori (p = 0.012). Triple therapy is effective and safe in eradicating H. pylori in patients after failure of omeprazole/amoxicillin. Smoking had no negative effect on the eradication rate of the triple therapy after failure of omeprazole/amoxicillin. Eradication failures were due to metronidazole-resistance.

Adult↗

[Are proton pump inhibitors superior to H2 receptor antagonists within the scope of H. pylori eradication therapy? Meta analysis of current parallel group comparisons].

The combined treatment with acid lowering drugs and antibiotics is widely accepted for H. pylori-eradication therapy. There are, however, controversies regarding the influence of the acid lowering drug on H. pylori-eradication rates. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to assess the available parallel-group eradication studies with proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists and to compare H. pylori-eradication rates for both classes of acid lowering drugs. METHODS. We performed a broad based medline search to retrieve all published treatment trails for H. pylori-infection. In addition, a manual search of the abstracts of major national and international meetings was conducted. In total seven publications of eight comparisons with a parallel group design comparing H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors plus antibiotics with a total of 538 patients were identified. Non parametric tests were utilized to assess the influence of the acid lowering drug on eradication rates. Furthermore, logistic regression adjusting for duration of antibiotic treatment and the number of antibiotics was used to compare the different acid lowering drugs. RESULTS. All studies utilized omeprazole as the proton pump inhibitor with doses ranging from 20 mg/die to 2 x 20 mg/die. Ranitidine (with doses ranging from 2 x 150 mg/die to 2 x 300 mg/die) was used in six trials and nizatidine (2 x 300 mg/die) in one trial. H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 78.6% (95% 73.6-83.5) with the proton pump inhibitor and in 76.5% (95% Cl 71.4-81.5) in patients treated with the H2-receptor antagonists. Utilizing two antibiotics instead of one antibiotic significantly increased eradication rates by 16.1% (95% Cl 9.3-22.8, p < 0.001). However, neither in protocols with one nor in protocols with two antibiotics the eradication rates significantly differed for regimens using H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors. CONCLUSION. H. pylori-eradication rates for treatment protocols with one or two antibiotics in combination with an acid lowering drug are not different for the proton pump inhibitors or h2-receptor antagonists. Therefore, the question whether H2-receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors should be used in combination with antibiotics for H. pylori eradication therapy is without clinical relevance.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

A twelve-month follow-up after Helicobacter pylori eradication. A clinical and histological evaluation.

To evaluate a twelve-month effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication, 258 consecutive out-patients with H. pylori related active duodenal ulcer were given a ten-day eradicating treatment. After healing no maintenance antiulcer medication was given. On entering the study and then 2, 6 and 12 months after the completion of therapy patients were scored for symptoms and underwent endoscopy to assess the presence of duodenal ulcer and to score antrum and corpus gastritis. Statistical analysis was performed by means of the chi 2 test. Histological eradication, defined as the inability to detect H. pylori six months after the completion of the eradication course, was proved in 85 subjects while the 123 non-eradicated ones were considered as the control group. Ulcer relapse rate and ulcer-like symptoms were significantly less frequent among eradicated than non eradicated throughout the follow-up. As compared to non eradicated, gastritis significantly improved among eradicated in both antrum and corpus. H. pylori eradication may be recommended since, by reducing ulcer relapse rate and related symptoms, there is no need for further antiulcer maintenance therapy with a significant drop in socioeconomic costs.

Adolescent↗

Basal and pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in duodenal ulcer subjects before and after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a 12-month follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of infection by Helicobacter pylori on gastric physiology in duodenal ulcer subjects is controversial. There is evidence that the infection is associated with abnormalities in gastrin homeostasis. Consistent changes in pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretory status have proved difficult to establish. This may be because patients have been studied too soon after Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIMS: To study the immediate and longer term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on basal and pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion in duodenal ulcer subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with active duodenal ulcer disease were studied. Ulcers were healed with sucralfate 2 g bd or ranitidine 300 mg nocte. Helicobacter pylori eradication was attempted with bismuth-based "Triple Therapy", and the nine patients in whom the organism was successfully eradicated were followed and studied over the 12-month period. Acid secretion was studied at entry (prior to the initiation of therapy), following healing, following eradication and 12 months later. Basal, low dose (0.1 microgram/kg) and high dose (6 micrograms/kg) pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion was determined. RESULTS: Whilst there was a tendency for basal and low dose-stimulated acid secretion to fall following eradication, in this study only the reduction in high dose-stimulated acid secretion achieved significance following eradication (entry mean = 59.6, post eradication mean = 49.6, p < 0.03). This effect of eradication on high dose pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion was also seen at the 12-month study (mean = 48.9, p < 0.02 versus entry). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggests that maximally stimulated acid secretion is modestly, albeit significantly, reduced following Helicobacter pylori eradication and that this effect persists.

Adult↗

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive patients.

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease is the cause for dyspepsia in about 10% of patients. 95% of duodenal and 70% of gastric ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori. Eradication of H pylori reduces the relapse rate of ulcers but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcomes were the proportion of peptic ulcers healed initially and proportion of patients free from relapse following successful healing. Eradication therapy was compared to placebo or pharmacological therapies in H. pylori positive patients. Secondary aims included symptom relief and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was undertaken according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Review Group module using CCTR, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies were contacted. Abstract books between 1994 and 2002 were hand-searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of short and long-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori positive adults were analysed. Patients received at least one week of H pylori eradication compared with ulcer healing drug, placebo or not treatment. Trials were included if they reported assessment from 2 weeks onwards. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected on ulcer healing, recurrence, relief of symptoms and adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS: 59 trials were eligible. Data extraction was not possible in 7 trials, and 52 trials were included. In duodenal ulcer healing, eradication therapy was superior to ulcer healing drug (UHD) (34 trials, 3910 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer persisting = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.76) and no treatment (2 trials, 207 patients, RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.26, 0.53). In gastric ulcer healing, no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and UHD (13 trials, 1469 patients, RR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.92, 1.90). In preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and maintenance therapy with UHD (4 trials, 319 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer recurring = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.42, 1.25), but eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (26 trials 2434 patients, RR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.26). In preventing gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (9 trials, 774 patients, RR = 0.31; 95% CI 0.19, 0.48). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: A 1 to 2 weeks course of H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori positive peptic ulcer disease.

Adult↗

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive patients.

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease is the cause for dyspepsia in about 10% of patients. 95% of duodenal and 70% of gastric ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori. Eradication of H pylori reduces the relapse rate of ulcers but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcomes were the proportion of peptic ulcers healed initially and proportion of patients free from relapse following successful healing. Eradication therapy was compared to placebo or pharmacological therapies in H. pylori positive patients. Secondary aims included symptom relief and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was undertaken according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Review Group module using CCTR, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies were contacted. Abstract books between 1994 and 2003 were hand-searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of short and long-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori positive adults were analysed. Patients received at least one week of H pylori eradication compared with ulcer healing drug, placebo or not treatment. Trials were included if they reported assessment from 2 weeks onwards. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected on ulcer healing, recurrence, relief of symptoms and adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS: 60 trials were eligible. Data extraction was not possible in 7 trials, and 53 trials were included. In duodenal ulcer healing, eradication therapy was superior to ulcer healing drug (UHD) (34 trials, 3910 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer persisting = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.76) and no treatment (2 trials, 207 patients, RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.26, 0.53). In gastric ulcer healing, no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and UHD (13 trials, 1469 patients, RR = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.92, 1.90). In preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and maintenance therapy with UHD (4 trials, 319 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer recurring = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.42, 1.25), but eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (27 trials 2509 patients, RR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.26). In preventing gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (10 trials, 1029 patients, RR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.18, 0.43). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: A 1 to 2 weeks course of H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori positive peptic ulcer disease.

Adult↗

Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive patients.

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease is the cause for dyspepsia in about 10% of patients. 95% of duodenal and 70% of gastric ulcers are associated with Helicobacter pylori. Eradication of H pylori reduces the relapse rate of ulcers but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcomes were the proportion of peptic ulcers healed initially and proportion of patients free from relapse following successful healing. Eradication therapy was compared to placebo or pharmacological therapies in H. pylori positive patients. Secondary aims included symptom relief and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3 2002) MEDLINE (1966 to July 2002) and EMBASE (1980 to July 2002). Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. The search was updated in September 2003, November 2004 and November 2005. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of short and long-term treatment of peptic ulcer disease in H. pylori positive adults were analysed. Patients received at least one week of H pylori eradication compared with ulcer healing drug, placebo or not treatment. Trials were included if they reported assessment from 2 weeks onwards. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected on ulcer healing, recurrence, relief of symptoms and adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS: 63 trials were eligible. Data extraction was not possible in 7 trials, and 56 trials were included. In duodenal ulcer healing, eradication therapy was superior to ulcer healing drug (UHD) (34 trials, 3910 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer persisting = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.76) and no treatment (2 trials, 207 patients, RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.26, 0.53). In gastric ulcer healing, no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and UHD (14 trials, 1572 patients, RR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.88, 1.76). In preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence no significant differences were detected between eradication therapy and maintenance therapy with UHD (4 trials, 319 patients, relative risk [RR] of ulcer recurring = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.42, 1.25), but eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (27 trials 2509 patients, RR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.15, 0.26). In preventing gastric ulcer recurrence, eradication therapy was superior to no treatment (11 trials, 1104 patients, RR = 0.29; 95% CI 0.20, 0.42). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A 1 to 2 weeks course of H. pylori eradication therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori positive peptic ulcer disease.

Adult↗