Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defibrillators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Cerebral oxygenation during defibrillator threshold testing of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) during defibrillator threshold testing of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) provokes global cerebral hypoperfusion and impaired oxygen delivery. Limited data are available on the neurophysiological effects of defibrillator threshold testing. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) can noninvasively measure changes in specific chromophores, which reflect cerebral oxygenation at the intravascular and mitochondrial levels. We performed a prospective trial using NIRS to analyze cerebral cortical oxygenation during defibrillator threshold testing. METHODS: Eleven patients (men = 9; age = 64 +/- 11 years: LVEF = 44 +/- 11%) underwent subpectoral ICD implantation and defibrillator threshold testing under general anesthesia. A NIRO 300 spectrometer was used to measure the absolute changes in the concentrations of oxyhemoglobin, de-oxyhemoglobin, and cytochrome c oxidase copper moiety during each procedure. The mean arterial blood pressure was monitored simultaneously. RESULTS: The mean number of defibrillator threshold tests was two (range 2-6). Twenty-six episodes of VF (duration 13.1 +/- 9.7 seconds; cycle length 230.2 +/- 20.8 ms) and two episodes of VT (duration 15 +/- 2.8 seconds; cycle length 320 +/- 11.3 ms) were induced. Each episode of VF and VT resulted in a decrease in the mean arterial blood pressure to 23.9 +/- 7.5 mmHg (p < or = 0.05) and oxyhemoglobin (-4.2 +/- 1.7 micromol/L; p < or = 0.05) and an increase in de-oxyhemoglobin (2.7 +/- 1.4 micromol/L). There was no change in the cytochrome c oxidase copper moiety redox status (0.09 +/- 0. 30 micromol/L). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that impaired oxygen delivery during induced VF and VT does not affect oxygen availability at the cellular intra-mitochondrial level.

Brain↗
PubMed1994

Effect of capacitor size and pathway resistance on defibrillation threshold for implantable defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The time constant of truncated exponential pulses used with implantable defibrillators is determined by the output capacitor size and defibrillation pathway resistance. The optimal capacitor size is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study compared defibrillation threshold (DFT) for standard 120-microF capacitors (DFT120) and smaller 60-microF capacitors (DFT60) at implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators in 67 patients using epicardial electrodes (15 patients) or one of four transvenous electrode configurations (52 patients). Paired comparisons of DFT60 and DFT120 were made for 44 defibrillation pathways using monophasic pulses and for 53 pathways using biphasic pulses. Truncated exponential pulses with 65% tilt were used. Pooled data from all electrode configurations showed a significant inverse correlation between pathway resistance and the ratio of stored energy DFT60 to DFT120 (monophasic pulses: r = .75, P = .0001; biphasic pulses: r = .68, P = .0001). Data from all electrode configurations formed a continuum with 120-microF capacitors superior for low-resistance pathways and 60-microF capacitors superior for high-resistance pathways. For pathways with resistance < or = 40 omega, the modest advantage of 120-microF capacitors applied primarily to pathways with low DFTs: 8.2 +/- 6.1 versus 9.6 +/- 5.4 J (P = .001) for monophasic pulses and 4.1 +/- 2.8 versus 5.1 +/- 3.1 J (P < .02) for biphasic pulses. The greater advantage of 60-microF capacitors for pathways with resistance > or = 61 omega applied to pathways with higher DFTs: 12.4 +/- 4.3 versus 23.1 +/- 6.4 J (P = .0001) for monophasic pulses and 8.5 +/- 4.9 versus 12.5 +/- 6.4 J (P = .0001) for biphasic pulses. For pathways using monophasic 120-microF pulses versus 95% for 60-microF pulses. Similarly, the DFT was < or = 10 J for 48% of pathways using biphasic 120-microF capacitors versus 83% for 60-microF pulses. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with conventional 120-microF capacitors, 60-microF capacitors had clinically insignificant higher DFTs for low-resistance pathways and clinically important lower DFTs for high-resistance pathways. Optimal capacitance is inversely related to pathway resistance for clinical defibrillation pathways and waveforms.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the optimal pharmacological therapy in cardioverter defibrillator patients (OPTIC) trial.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) receive adjunctive antiarrhythmic drug therapy, most commonly amiodarone or sotalol. The effects of these drugs on defibrillation energy requirements have not been previously assessed in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) trial was a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of amiodarone plus beta-blocker and sotalol versus beta-blocker alone for reduction of ICD shocks. Within OPTIC, a prospectively designed substudy evaluated the effects of the 3 treatment arms on defibrillation energy requirements. Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were measured (binary step-down protocol) at baseline and again after 8 to 12 weeks of therapy in 94 patients, of whom 29 were randomized to receive beta-blocker therapy (control group), 35 to amiodarone plus beta-blocker, and 30 to sotalol. In the control group, the mean DFT decreased from 8.77+/-5.15 J at baseline to 7.13+/-3.43 J (P=0.027); in the amiodarone group, DFT increased from 8.53+/-4.29 to 9.82+/-5.84 J (P=0.091). In the sotalol group, DFT decreased from 8.09+/-4.81 to 7.20+/-5.30 J (P=0.21). DFT changes in the beta-blocker and the amiodarone group were significantly different (P=0.006). In all patients, adequate safety margins for defibrillation were maintained. No clinical variable predicted baseline DFT or changes in DFT on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although amiodarone increased DFT, the effect size with modern ICD systems is very small. Therefore, DFT reassessment after the institution of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone or sotalol is not routinely required.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1994

[Pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation combined with transvenous bipolar defibrillation electrodes].

Ultimately, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) will one day be implantable like present pacemakers. However, due to the size of the pulse generator and the low defibrillation efficacy of monophasic shocks, only a few selected patients have been implanted transvenously-pectorally. Therefore, we have prospectively investigated whether a transvenous-pectoral approach is in general feasible with a new downsized ICD capable of delivering biphasic shocks. Out of 33 patients, 76% received a bipolar transvenous defibrillation lead system. In the first 13 consecutive patients, a randomized crossover study showed that this high efficacy was above all achieved by a superior defibrillation efficacy of the biphasic waveform in comparison to the monophasic waveform (69% vs. 23%; p = 0.03). Not a single patient could be defibrillated exclusively with the monophasic waveform. In a further 15 consecutive patients, a crossover study showed that a position of the transvenous anode within the Vena anonyma instead of the Vena cava superior is, in general, not superior (87% vs. 80%; p = 0.67). Only one patient could be exclusively defibrillated with the V. anonyma position. Intraoperatively, no complications occurred and all but one patient received a pectoral implantation of the pulse generator. Postoperatively, in five patients local complications related to the ICD system were seen; two needed a surgical revision. In two patients movements of the left shoulder joint were temporarily restricted. Thus, in the majority of patients a new downsized ICD capable of biphasic shocks can be implanted transvenously-pectorally like a pacemaker.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Time to defibrillation: a controlled laboratory study comparing three automated and semi-automated defibrillators.

Currently there are three vendors marketing first-responder defibrillation units. Each vendor's unit has its own distinct features, advantages, and disadvantages, making the selection of one vendor's unit a complex decision. However, two critical performance criteria upon which a decision to choose one vendor's unit over another could be 1) differences in dysrhythmia recognition sensitivity and specificity and 2) time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. While there appears to be evidence suggesting no significant differences between the three units in terms of dysrhythmia recognition, there do not appear to be any controlled 'time-to-defibrillation' studies. The purpose of this study was to determine if, under controlled conditions, any performance differences existed between these three units in time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. The results of this study suggest that there are no pragmatic differences between the three defibrillation units. In the absence of time-to-defibrillation differences, EMS systems managers can place more emphasis on other features so as to better address the needs, concerns, and resources of their system.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation Investigators.

All transthoracic defibrillators on the US market use nominally monophasic shock waveforms. However, biphasic waveforms have a lower defibrillation threshold than monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation of animals and for defibrillation of humans by implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The relative efficacies of Edmark monophasic and Gurvich biphasic transthoracic cardioversion waveforms (200 J into 50 omega) were compared for transthoracic cardioversion in 171 patients undergoing electrophysiologic study for evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias. Patients were randomized in a blinded fashion to receive either a monophasic or a biphasic waveform for the initial shock for conversion of induced ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation [VF] = 53, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia [VT] = 80, polymorphic VT = 30, ventricular flutter = 8). Delivered energies for the Edmark and Gurvich waveforms were 215 +/- 11 and 171 +/- 11 J, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, use of antiarrhythmic agents, arrhythmia cycle length, or duration of arrhythmia prior to shock for monophasic and biphasic waveform groups. The first shock for all arrhythmias was successful in 75 of 88 patients (85.2%) for the monophasic waveform compared with 81 of 83 patients (97.6%) for the biphasic waveform, p = 0.0054. The first shock for VF was successful in 22 of 28 patients (78.6%) for the monophasic waveform compared with 25 of 25 (100%) for the biphasic waveform, p = 0.0241. The Gurvich biphasic waveforms delivering a mean of 171 J were superior to Edmark monophasic waveforms delivering a mean of 215 J for transthoracic cardioversion of arrhythmias of short duration. This finding may have important implications for the development of future transthoracic defibrillators.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Finite element analysis of defibrillation fields in a human torso model for ventricular defibrillation.

In order to optimize defibrillation electrode systems for ventricular defibrillation thresholds (DFTs), a Finite Element Torso model was built from fast CT scans of a patient who had large cardiac dimensions (upper bound of normal) but no heart disease. Clinically used defibrillation electrode configurations, i.e. Superior Vena Cava (SVC) to Right Ventricle (RV) (SVC-RV), left pectoral Can to RV (Can-RV) and Can + SVC-RV, were analyzed. The DFTs were calculated based on 95% ventricular mass having voltage gradient > 5 V/cm and these results were also compared with clinical data. The low voltage gradient regions with voltage gradient < 5 V/cm were identified and the effect of electrode dimension and location on DFTs were also investigated for each system. A good correlation between the model results and the clinical data supports the use of Finite Element Analysis of a human torso model for optimization of defibrillation electrode systems. This correlation also indicates that the critical mass hypothesis is the primary mechanism of defibrillation. Both the FEA results and the clinical data show that Can + SVC-RV system offers the lowest voltage DFTs when compared with SVC-RV and Can-RV systems. Analysis of the effect of RV, SVC and Can electrode dimensions and locations can have an important impact on defibrillation lead designs.

Computational Biology↗
PubMed2002

Defibrillation threshold and cardiac responses using an external biphasic defibrillator with pediatric and adult adhesive patches in pediatric-sized piglets.

Before recommendations for using an automatic external defibrillator on pediatric patients can be made, a protocol for the energy of a biphasic waveform energy dosing needs to be determined that will allow ventricular defibrillation of 8 year olds while causing only a minimal amount of cardiac damage to infants. Pediatric- and adult-sized electrode patches were alternately applied to 10 isoflurane-anesthetized piglets weighing 3.8-20.1 kg to approximate the body weights of newborns to children < 8 years old. The defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined for biphasic truncated exponential waveform shocks. Additional shocks, varying from the DFT to 360 Joules (J), were delivered during sinus rhythm or following 30 s of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The DFT was 2.4+/-0.81 and 2.1+/-0.65 J/kg for pediatric and adult patches, respectively (P = N.S.). The change in left ventricular (LV) dP/dt from baseline as a function of shock strength was significantly different at 1 and 10 s after shocks of increasing energy that were delivered in sinus rhythm, and 1, 10, 20, and 30 s after defibrillation shocks. There was no significant difference in LV dP/dt with increasing shock energy at 60 s with either patch size. The time to return of sinus rhythm, ST-segment deviation, and cardiac output were also not significantly different from baseline 60 s following shocks of up to 360 J delivered during sinus rhythm or VF with either patch. The same amount of energy delivered with a biphasic external defibrillator successfully defibrillated VF whether adult or pediatric patches were used. Cardiac rhythm and hemodynamic variables were unaltered at 60 s after shocks delivered at energies of up to 360 J. These data suggest that there is a substantial safety margin above a DFT strength shock for this biphasic waveform in piglets.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Effect of coronary sinus electrode on the optimal atrial defibrillation pathway for an atrioventricular defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have demonstrated significant failure in converting atrial fibrillation (AF) using a conventional ventricular pathway. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of incorporating a coronary sinus (CS) lead into the atrial defibrillation pathway in atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) reduction in patients with persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was a prospective, randomized assessment of shock configuration on ADFT in 18 patients undergoing elective internal cardioversion for persistent AF (mean AF duration: 8 +/- 9 months). The lead system included a dual-coil defibrillation lead (Endotak DSP, Guidant) with a distal right ventricular (RV) electrode and a proximal superior vena cava (SVC) electrode, a CS lead (Perimeter, Guidant), and a left pectoral cutaneous electrode (Can). In each patient, dual step-up ADFTs were determined for each of three vectors: (1) RV --> SVC+Can; (2) CS --> SVC+Can; and (3) RV --> CS+SVC+Can (group 1, n = 8) or RV+CS --> SVC+Can (group 2, n = 10), using R wave-synchronized biphasic shocks. Successful defibrillation was achieved in all patients without any ventricular proarrhythmia. ADFT of CS --> SVC+Can (11.8 +/- 5.6 J) was significantly lower than ADFT of RV --> SVC+Can (16.5 +/- 7.8 J, P = 0.021). ADFT of CS --> SVC+Can was similar to RV --> CS+SVC+Can (group 1: 12.0 +/- 6.5 J vs 17.4 +/- 4.8 J, P = 0.16), but it was significantly higher than RV+CS --> SVC+Can (group 2: 9.0 +/- 3.9 J vs 11.6 +/- 5.0 J, P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Patients with persistent AF of substantial duration can be reliably cardioverted using a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead set; however, the incorporation of a CS lead to the conventional ICD lead configuration significantly lowered ADFT. The optimal shock vector that incorporates a CS lead for atrial defibrillation requires future studies.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Technologic advances and program initiatives in public access defibrillation using automated external defibrillators.

Widespread provision of early defibrillation following cardiac arrest holds major promise for improved survival from ventricular fibrillation. The critical element in predicting a successful outcome is the rapidity with which defibrillation is achieved. A worldwide awareness of this potential and its advocacy by such organizations as the American Heart Association have been pivotal in the evolution of initiatives to make defibrillation more widely and more rapidly available. The feasibility of this initiative, known as public access defibrillation, is in large measure a direct consequence of major technologic advances in automated external defibrillators (AEDs). New low-energy waveforms with biphasic morphology have been shown to be more effective in terminating ventricular fibrillation and may do so with less myocardial injury. Placement of AEDs in a variety of nontraditional settings such as police cars, aircraft and airport terminals, and gambling casinos has been shown to yield an impressive number of survivors of cardiac arrest in ventricular fibrillation. Questions yet to be answered center on the appropriate disposition of AEDs in public access defibrillation settings, training and retraining issues, device maintenance, and collection of accurate data to document benefit and to identify areas of needed improvement or expansion of AED availability.

Automation↗
PubMed2004

Wide variation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption intervals among commercially available automated external defibrillators may affect survival despite high defibrillation efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have associated interruptions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation imposed by automated external defibrillators (AEDs) with poor resuscitation outcome. In particular, the "hands-off" interval between precordial compressions and subsequent defibrillation shock has been implicated. We sought to determine the range of variation among current-generation AEDs with respect to this characteristic. MEASUREMENTS: Seven AEDs from six manufacturers were characterized via stopwatch and arrhythmia simulator with respect to the imposed hands-off interval. All AEDs were equipped with new batteries, and measurements were repeated five times for each AED. MAIN RESULTS: A wide variation in the hands-off interval between precordial compressions and shock delivery was observed, ranging from 5.2 to 28.4 secs, with only one AED achieving an interruption of <10 secs. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that this range of variation could be responsible for a more than two-fold variation in patient resuscitation success, an effect that far exceeds any defibrillation efficacy differences that may hypothetically exist. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to defibrillation waveform and dose, researchers should consider the hands-off cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption interval between cardiopulmonary resuscitation and subsequent defibrillation shock to be an important covariate of outcome in resuscitation studies. Defibrillator design should minimize this interval to avoid potential adverse consequences on patient survival.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMed1989

Effects of time to defibrillation and subthreshold preshocks on defibrillation success in pigs.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of: (1) time to defibrillation and (2) subthreshold preshocks on defibrillation success. We conducted two separate experiments in 19 anaesthetized, open-chested pigs. Defibrillation was attempted using the sequential pulse technique approximately 10 s after electrically induced ventricular fibrillation. Each sequential pulse shock consisted of two trapezoidal pulses (approximately 3 ms duration), separated by 0.2 ms. Current was delivered to three mesh electrodes (TX-7, Medtronic) sutured over the anterior right ventricle, posterior right ventricle, and lateral left ventricle. For each animal, defibrillation threshold (DFT) defined as the lowest delivered energy that defibrillated the heart, was measured twice and the average was designated as mean DFT. The energy at 1.4 times the specific mean DFT for each pig was designated as the test shock and 100 volts less than the mean DFT was designated as the preshock. In the first experiment, test shocks were delivered at five different fibrillation intervals (10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 s). Time to test shock delivery was randomized for 10 to 60 s, but, 90 s was always tested at the end of the study. Percentages of success at 10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 s were 94, 78, 94, 83, and 100%, respectively (p = NS). The 12 pigs in which all initial test shocks were successful were selected for the evaluation of post defibrillation arrhythmias. The cumulative incidence of complete heart block lasting at least 5 s were 8, 33, 83, 83, and 83%, respectively. The incidence of complete heart block increased significantly at 40 s (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt.

Although it is generally assumed that defibrillation becomes more difficult when the duration of VF is prolonged, after a failed defibrillation attempt, there is little information on the defibrillation efficacy of multiple shocks delivered at the same energy. The purpose of this study was to systematically examine the efficacy of a second shock delivered at the same or reversed polarity after a failed first shock. Defibrillation was attempted after 10 seconds of VF in 12 pigs (30-56 kg) using biphasic waveforms and a nonthoracotomy lead system. Shock energy was held constant for the first and second shocks at 50%-90% of the DFT. The second shock was delivered 10 seconds after a failed first shock. First and second shock polarity (first phase) was randomized to (+, +), (+, -), (-, -), (-, +). The incidence of successful defibrillation (for all polarities) was 12.3% for first and 49.1% for second shocks (P < 0.0001). Anodal first shocks had a 17.2% incidence of success as opposed to a 7.4% incidence of success with cathodal first shocks (P = 0.001). Anodal second shocks had a 55.5% incidence of success compared to a 42.7% incidence of success with cathodal second shocks (P = 0.008). There was no significant benefit from polarity reversal after a failed first shock (P = 0.29). In conclusion, less energy is required for successful defibrillation by a second shock after a failed first. The optimal configuration for first and second shocks is with the RV as anode. Polarity reversal of a second shock after a failed first does not affect the probability of second shock success.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Internal defibrillation with smaller capacitors: a prospective randomized cross-over comparison of defibrillation efficacy obtained with 90-microF and 125-microF capacitors in humans.

INTRODUCTION: The size of current implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) is still large in comparison to pacemakers and thus not convenient for pectoral implantation. One way to reduce ICD size is to defibrillate with smaller capacitors. A trade-off exists, however, since smaller capacitors may generate a lower maximum energy output. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective randomized cross-over study, the step-down defibrillation threshold (DFT) of an experimental 90-microF biphasic waveform was compared to a standard 125-microF biphasic waveform. The 90-microF capacitor delivered the same energy faster and with a higher peak voltage but provided only a maximum energy output of 20 instead of 34 J. DFTs were determined intraoperatively in 30 patients randomized to receive either an endocardial (n = 15) or an endocardial-subcutaneous array (n = 15) defibrillation lead system. Independent of the lead system used, energy requirements did not differ at DFT for the experimental and the standard waveforms (10.3 +/- 4.1 and 9.5 +/- 4.9 J, respectively), but peak voltages were higher for the experimental waveform than for the standard waveform (411 +/- 80 and 325 +/- 81 V, respectively). For the experimental waveform the DFT w as 10 J or less using an endocardial lead-alone system in 10 (67%) of 15 patients and in 12 (80%) of 15 patients using an endocardial-subcutaneous array lead system. CONCLUSIONS: A shorter duration waveform delivered by smaller capacitors does not increase defibrillation energy requirements and might reduce device size. However, the smaller capacitance reduces the maximum energy output. If a 10-J safety margin between DFT and maximum energy output of the ICD is required, only a subgroup of patients will benefit from 90-microF ICDs with DFTs feasible using current defibrillation lead systems.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Regional hyperkalemia increases ventricular defibrillation energy requirements: role of electrical heterogeneity in defibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Increased spatial electrical heterogeneity has been associated with impaired defibrillation efficacy. The current study investigated the relationship between electrical heterogeneity and defibrillation efficacy by manipulating spatial electrical heterogeneity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We increased spatial electrical heterogeneity by infusing potassium chloride (2 to 4 mEq/hour) or placebo in the left anterior descending artery in 13 pentobarbital anesthetized swine. Electrophysiologic measurements at five myocardial sites and defibrillation energy requirement (DER) values were determined at baseline and during regional hyperkalemia (n = 7) or placebo (n = 6). Regional potassium infusion was titrated to a 20% reduction in action potential duration in the perfused region. Regional hyperkalemia increased biphasic DER values by 87% (P = 0.02), whereas infusion of placebo did not alter defibrillation efficacy. Regional hyperkalemia decreased myocardial repolarization and refractoriness in the perfused region by 21% (P < 0.001) and 18% (P = 0.01), respectively. However, regional hyperkalemia increased ventricular fibrillation cycle length (VFCL) by 39% (P = 0.008). Consequently, dispersions of repolarization, refractoriness, and VFCL were significantly increased by 169%, 92%, and 200%, respectively. Regional hyperkalemia also increased ventricular conduction time to the perfused region by 54% (P = 0.006), indicating conduction velocity dispersion, while not affecting local pacing threshold or local voltage gradient. CONCLUSION: Regional hyperkalemia increased DER values. Regional hyperkalemia likely impairs defibrillation by increasing myocardial electrical heterogeneity, which supports the theory that electrical heterogeneity promotes nonuniform propagation of early postshock activations, thereby inhibiting defibrillation.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Prediction of defibrillation outcome by epicardial activation patterns following shocks near the defibrillation threshold.

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular defibrillation is probabilistic and shock strength dependent. We investigated the relationship between defibrillation outcome and postshock activation patterns for shocks of the same strength (approximately 50% probability of success for defibrillation [ED50] to yield an equal number of successful and failed shocks). METHODS AND RESULTS: In five pigs, 10 shocks of approximately ED50 strength (right ventricle-superior vena cava, biphasic, 6/4 msec) were delivered after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Epicardial activation sequences following shocks were mapped with a 504-electrode shock and analyzed by animating dV/dt of the electrograms. Intercycle interval (ICI, time between the onset of successive postshock cycles), wavefront conduction time (WCT, time between the earliest and latest activation of a cycle), and overlapping index (WCT of cycle[n]/ICI of cycle[n+1]) were determined for the first five postshock cycles. An overlapping index >1 indicates overlap between successive cycles. Of 50 defibrillation attempts, 25 were successes. There was no difference between successful and failed episodes for both ICI (68 +/- 9 msec vs 62 +/- 10 msec) and WCT (97 +/- 24 msec vs 100 +/- 14 msec) of cycle 1. However, starting at cycle 2, the ICI was longer, and the WCT was shorter for successful than failed episodes (P < 0.01). Overlapping cycles (index > 1) were found during the transition from cycles 2 through 5 in all failed (index >1) and in no successful episodes. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Defibrillation outcome cannot be determined during the first postshock cycle. (2) At least three rapid successive cycles with overlap of cycles 2 and 3 are present in all failed and in no successful episodes. (3) The overlapping index is a marker to predict defibrillation outcome.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

[Technical requirements for early defibrillation: what are the capabilities of automated external defibrillators].

Modern automated external defibrillators (AEDs) offer a variety of technical improvements which increase the efficacy of early defibrillation, facilitate the application by not or minimally trained persons and improve safety. The development of biphasic shocks allows better myocardial protection, the use of lithium batteries, and a marked decrease of AEDs, in size. Microprocessors realize complex acoustic and visual prompts which lead the user through all steps of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) according to current guidelines. The design of AEDs has been simplified; many devices provide only a single button which can be used for all active processes. Memory functions record the whole CPR with all details which can be transferred to other computers and analyzed off-line. The introduction of AEDs has reduced the delay between collapse and defibrillation to less than 4 min in several studies thus increasing the success of CPR and the proportion of patients dismissed from hospital alive and without neurological deficit. Up to 93% of untrained volunteers were able to successfully complete defibrillation with the use of an AED, sixth-form pupils without experience in CPR were only few sec slower with an AED than staff of emergency medical services. The ability to perform CPR after defibrillation guided by the AED depends primarily on the clarity of acoustic prompts which have to consider the terms and abbreviations of the respective language. Currently available AEDs surpass performance goals of the AHA. However, all devices exhibit advantages and disadvantages which will be discussed in this review.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗