Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Clinical practice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

An evidence-based approach to evaluating and improving clinical practice: implementing practice guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines can improve health care outcomes, but they are only as effective as their implementation. We present a framework for implementing practice guidelines that begins by identifying the forces driving and restraining the adoption of the guideline. Strategies for changing physician behavior that strengthen the driving forces and weaken the restraining forces can then be incorporated into a comprehensive implementation program. Nine strategies for changing physician behavior are presented, based on a review of the literature and organizational experience at Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. In designing an implementation strategy, it is essential that the resources allocated to implementation are commensurate with the improvement in outcomes expected from the successful implementation of the guideline. All implementation programs should include plans for measuring outcomes to allow for continuing improvement. Guideline implementation, evaluation and improvement efforts are most likely to be successful when they are part of an explicit, evidence-based process for evaluating and improving clinical practice.

Decision Making↗

[CSF-analyses in clinical diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. A literature review and three cases from routine clinical practice].

The clinical diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is often difficult, since the clinical presentation varies between patients and is often uncharacteristic. Therefore, CJD is often not suspected until late in the disease process, due to the rapid progress of the disease. Suspected CJD is, however, frequent in routine clinical practice, in the investigation of patients with rapidly progressing dementia and/or uncharacteristic neurological symptoms. We present results from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses in CJD, focusing on the two neuron-specific proteins 14-3-3 and tau. Analysis of 14-3-3 protein is performed by Western blotting, in which 14-3-3 is either detectable in CSF or not, while CSF-tau is analyzed using quantitative ELISA methodology, in which a markedly increased CSF level of tau (< 1500 pg/mL) is indicative of CJD. Tau and 14-3-3 findings show comparable sensitivity and specificity, higher than the presence of spike and wave complexes on an EEG. The increase in CSF-tau in CJD is substantially higher than in Alzheimer's disease, with low overlap between the disorders. Instead, false positive results are found in disorders with massive acute neuronal damage (encephalitis, stroke and CNS tumors). In cases in which these disorders cannot be differentiated from CJD on clinical grounds, they can often be identified by MRT or by the finding of blood-brain barrier damage or signs of inflammation upon CSF analysis. CSF-tau is increasingly used in the routine diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and the analysis also seems to be of use in the clinical diagnosis of CJD. We also present three cases from routine clinical practice, all with a marked increase in CSF-tau, which was the only positive objective sign in two of the cases.

Aged↗

New guidelines for potassium replacement in clinical practice: a contemporary review by the National Council on Potassium in Clinical Practice.

This article is the result of a meeting of the National Council on Potassium in Clinical Practice. The Council, a multidisciplinary group comprising specialists in cardiology, hypertension, epidemiology, pharmacy, and compliance, was formed to examine the critical role of potassium in clinical practice. The goal of the Council was to assess the role of potassium in terms of current medical practice and future clinical applications. The primary outcome of the meeting was the development of guidelines for potassium replacement therapy. These guidelines represent a consensus of the Council members and are intended to provide a general approach to the prevention and treatment of hypokalemia.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

Cognitive psychological studies of representation and use of clinical practice guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines provide a means to enhance physician performance. This investigation was undertaken in an attempt to understand the nature of impact of guideline use on physician performance. We investigated the impact of (a) algorithmic-based and (b) text-based practice guidelines on clinical decision-making by physicians at varying levels of expertise. Data were collected using clinical scenarios and a think-aloud paradigm, both with (primed) and without (spontaneous) the use of the guidelines. The two guidelines used in the study were management of diabetes and screening for thyroid disease. The results show that guidelines were used as reminders for both experts and non-experts. Guidelines acted as an educational tool for non-experts by assisting in knowledge reorganization, particularly for the non-experts. Text and algorithmic guideline formats were both useful to physician performance depending on the purpose of use: solving clinical problems or learning. These results provide insights into how guidelines can be fine-tuned for different users and for different purposes. Empirical research, coupled with design principles from the cognitive sciences, can form an essential component of guideline design and development.

Adult↗

Clinical practice in academic medical center departments of family medicine. The Association of Departments of Family Medicine Task Force on Clinical Practice in US family medicine departments in academic medical centers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conducted by a task force of the Association of Departments of Family Medicine, this study defines current issues in the clinical practice of academic departments of family medicine in US medical schools. METHODS: A survey instrument on departmental demographics, funding, teaching, and governance in regard to clinical practice was sent to 130 family medicine department chairs or other key contacts in US medical schools. A total of 106 usable responses were obtained, for an 81.5% response rate. RESULTS: Results indicate that, in response to a need to increase clinical practice income, academic medical centers (AMCs) and departments are increasingly hiring physician faculty for positions that mainly involve patient care, although at salaries less than the community level. In spite of increasing departmental responsibilities in predoctoral and resident education and clinical practice, much teaching is done by community physicians. There is significant purchasing of community practices and growing involvement of the AMCs in the practice activities of departments. Two thirds of clinical chairs reported "pretty good" to "great" satisfaction on a five-point scale. CONCLUSIONS: Departments of family medicine are increasing their practice activities, perhaps to the detriment of teaching and research. The clinical practice autonomy of departments of family medicine is being diluted by increased institutional control and by mergers with the practices of other primary care disciplines. These changes give rise to a reasonable concern that academic departments of family medicine and their faculty may give up control of their clinical practice and lose their identity through conversion to "generic" primary care departments and providers.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Best practices in the development of clinical practice guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been used to reduce unnecessary and undesirable variations in clinical practice. Many facilities succeed in developing and using these tools, while others conclude that they are not worth the effort. This article describes the results of a systemwide analysis of the processes a healthcare system used to plan, develop, implement, and measure CPGs after several years of experience. Extensive interviews were conducted at facilities in which the CPG program was active to determine what factors had contributed to its success or failure. The result is a series of recommendations that will facilitate CPG implementation in virtually any clinical setting.

Benchmarking↗

Expense comparison of a telemedicine practice versus a traditional clinical practice.

This paper compares the expenses of a telemedicine program to those of a traditional clinical practice using data from two fiscal years (FY) 1998/1999 and 2000/2001. As part of that evaluation, we compared expenses of the University of Arizona's clinical practice group, the University Physicians Incorporated (UPI), to those of the Arizona Telemedicine Program (ATP) practice. For this study, we used the reporting categories published in the year-end UPI financial statement. These categories included clinical services, administration, equipment depreciation, and overhead. Results showed that clinical service expenses and administrative expenses for FY 2000/2001 were higher in the traditional UPI practice, whereas equipment depreciation and overhead expenses are higher in the telemedicine practice. This differs somewhat from FY 1998/1999, where clinical expenses and overhead were higher in the UPI practice and administration and equipment depreciation were higher in the telemedicine practice. We will discuss the relevance of these results and the critical factors that contribute to these differences.

Arizona↗

Evidence-based nursing: making changes in the clinical practice through the collaboration of nursing students and practicing nurses.

The collaboration between student nurses and practicing clinical nurses on an evidence-based project is described. This collaboration sought to answer a question pertinent to the needs of the clinical nurses, while providing the students with an excellent practical learning opportunity. The changes in both knowledge and practice resulting from this partnership are described.

Cooperative Behavior↗

Practice analysis: defining the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy.

STUDY DESIGN: Nonexperimental descriptive research design. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of use and perceived level of importance of professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas by physical therapists practicing in primary contact care settings and to compare these data to similar data from physical therapists practicing in nonprimary contact care settings. BACKGROUND: Physical therapy services have moved toward a primary contact model of practice in response to changes in the health care delivery system. Several studies have reported the effectiveness of primary contact physical therapy. However, a practice analysis has not been performed to define the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy. METHODS AND MEASURES: A sample of 212 physical therapists practicing as primary contact providers in the military and civilian sectors, and a comparison group of 250 physical therapists not practicing as primary contact providers were surveyed. A Delphi technique was used to develop the survey instrument, which was pretested by a pilot group. The final survey instrument consisted of 171 items. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to examine significant differences among the 3 groups (P<.001). RESULTS: Of the 212 surveys mailed to the primary contact group, 119 (56.1%) responses were received (82 military physical therapists and 37 civilian physical therapists). Of the 250 surveys mailed to the comparison group, 103 (41.2%) responses were received. There were numerous significant differences among the 3 groups in professional responsibilities, procedures, and knowledge areas, most notably in the areas of selecting and ordering of imaging procedures, identifying signs and symptoms of nonmusculoskeletal conditions, establishing physical therapy diagnoses, and prescribing over-the-counter medications. CONCLUSION: The study describes the clinical practice of physical therapists functioning in the role of primary contact providers or as members of a diverse team of health care professionals in primary care, which may provide curricular direction to professional, postprofessional, and clinical residency or fellowship-based educational settings.

Adult↗

Translating research into clinical practice: critical interpretation of clinical trials in schizophrenia.

Translating research into clinical practice has in part been hampered by practitioners' difficulties in interpreting statistical measures. The main part of this article aims to bridge the gap between research and practice by describing frequently occurring problems in the methodology and reporting of clinical trials. Basic methodological concepts and statistical measures, such as different trial designs, randomization, blinding, case numbers, eligibility criteria, internal and external validity, efficacy versus effectiveness, the meaning of rating scales, choice of comparators, effect size versus P-value and the interpretation of risk measures, are explained and their use illustrated. The text further presents the outcome from a workshop on 'Translating Clinical Studies into Practice' held at an international conference on schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in June 2005. The participants suggested more emphasis on additional secondary endpoints in clinical trials such as patients' self assessments and indicators of well-being. Better training of clinicians in the interpretation of scientific results and the use of more meaningful clinical outcomes are both needed to effectively translate research into clinical practice.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Can surveying practitioners about their practices help identify priority clinical practice guideline topics?

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements designed to assist in patient and physician clinical decision making for specific clinical circumstances. In order to establish which guideline topics are priorities, practitioners were surveyed regarding their current practice. METHODS: One hundred ninety-seven practitioners in Ontario, Canada were mailed a survey exploring their current practice or opinion regarding the prophylactic use of anticonvulsant drugs in patients with malignant glioma who had never had a seizure. The survey consisted of seven questions regarding the relevance of a guideline on the subject to the practitioner's practice, the proportion of clinical cases involving anticonvulsant use, knowledge of existing guidelines on this topic, interest in reviewing a completed practice guideline and three clinical scenarios. RESULTS: There were 122 respondents who returned the survey (62% rate of return). Eighty percent of the practitioners who responded indicated that less than 25% of their clinical cases involved the use of anticonvulsants; however, only 16% of respondents indicated that a practice guideline would be irrelevant to their practice. Eighty percent of respondents volunteered to review a draft version of a practice guideline on the use of anticonvulsants. The survey presented the practitioners with three scenarios where anticonvulsants in patients with brain tumours may be appropriate: peri-operatively in patients without seizures, postoperatively in patients currently using anticonvulsants, and thirdly in patients not currently using anticonvulsants or undergoing surgery. In contrast to the third situation, the first two situations yielded considerable variation in practitioner response. CONCLUSION: The survey established that there is some variation present in the current practice of anticonvulsant use in the patients with brain tumours. Whether there is an optimal treatment practice has yet to be determined. Practitioners do seem to feel that a guideline on anticonvulsant use in warranted, and most practitioners would be interested in being part of the guideline development process.

Anticonvulsants↗

Care of patients with type II diabetes: a study of family physicians' compliance with clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with type II diabetes mellitus receive care by family physicians. The goals of this study were to determine the level of diabetes care provided by family physicians; to assess family physicians' compliance with the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) guidelines; and to examine relationships between various aspects of diabetes care and glycemic control. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted of 118 patients with type II diabetes mellitus in 10 family practice clinics in Newfoundland. The study population consisted of 55 male and 63 female patients with a mean age of 64 (range 29 to 88) years. Using standardized forms based on the CDA guidelines, information about plasma glucose and lipid levels, presence of diabetes complications, and physician management practices were extracted from patient charts. The main outcome measure was glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. RESULTS: Only 53% patients had HbA1c measurements done in the previous year; these persons had a significantly longer duration of diabetes that those who did not have their HbA1c measured. Eighty-seven percent of patients had optimal or good plasma glucose levels. Compliance with CDA guidelines by physicians was poor; physicians were doing about half the recommended checks and procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the present study seem to suggest that family physicians are doing a good job of providing care for their patients with type II diabetes. The results, however, should be interpreted with caution until further research is done to replicate our findings because of the limitations of this small retrospective study.

Adult↗

Status of quantitative EEG (QEEG) in clinical practice, 1994.

Clinical quantitative EEG (qEEG) is a complex specialty that may include not only standard EEG but also digital ("paperless") EEG, topographic mapping, spectral analysis, spectral coherence, long latency and event related potentials (EP), significance probability mapping (SPM), dipole source localization methodology (DLM), and discriminant function analysis. There are three basic clinical uses: non-specific detection of organicity/encephalopathy, specific categorization of disease or clinical condition, and epileptic source localization. Extreme variations exist in the competency of laboratories practicing clinical qEEG; universally agreed upon standards of practice have not been established but there are a number of efforts to do so. As expected, the clinical value of qEEG to patients varies similarly. Criticisms of qEEG have now been answered: Color displays need not be deceptive. Statistical "capitalization upon chance" can be easily avoided. By training and with newer analytic procedures, artifacts can be recognized and often removed. Data based upon spectral analysis and EP can reliably classify clinical conditions thereby demonstrating a greater sensitivity to EEG/EP data than possible by conventional visual inspection. QEEG is clearly of clinical value when performed in concert with standard EEG and analyzed by clinicians with demonstrated competency in standard EEG followed by specialized training and demonstrated competency in qEEG. QEEG is not a simple substitute for conventional EEG and cannot be seen as a substitute for clinical competence. Although continuing to develop, qEEG technology has matured sufficiently and is now well established. Concerns regarding its clinical use have primarily resulted from its misapplication and misinterpretation stemming, largely, from inadequate personnel training and expertise.

Brain Mapping↗

Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.

While multiple trials support routine mammography for women aged 50 to 69 demonstrating a reduction in breast cancer deaths by about 30%, experts disagree on breast cancer screening recommendations for women 40 to 49 years old. A review of the data and its interpretation illustrate the areas of controversy: lack of statistical power, prolonged screening intervals, suboptimal mammographic technical quality, and difficulty applying the data to current mammographic screening practice. Clinical decision making for health care providers and women aged 40 to 49 is guided by understanding the risk of breast cancer and weighing the risk and benefits of screening mammography. Further research to resolve whether breast cancer screening is effective in decreasing breast cancer deaths in women aged 40 to 49 is needed.

Adult↗

How to implement change in clinical practice.

Changing clinical practice is a major challenge. It is not acceptable simply to send out a new clinical guideline or care pathway and expect there to be a change in practice. This paper addresses the problems associated with the development of a clinical guideline and sets out a clear strategy for dissemination, implementation and evaluation in a way that should promote the successful change of practice. The first section examines the development of the guideline. National or international guidelines may well exist but local adaptation and refinement of those guidelines are required, along with a local summary document. Valid, reproducible, evidence-based, clear, logical, easily accessible guidelines need to be available after widespread local, multi-professional consultation. Second, prior to dissemination, there needs to be promotion among all the health professionals and families involved with the change in practice. Appropriate educational and multi-disciplinary interventions, highlighting and informing in workshops and preparing people for the changes are recommended. Recognising the barriers to implementation and change and addressing these locally is important. Once the guideline has been disseminated and implemented and the change in practice has occurred, full evaluation and ongoing audit of the changes in practice are required to sustain the changes.

Guideline Adherence↗

Clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of zanamivir (Relenza): translating the evidence into clinical practice, a National Institute for Clinical Excellence view.

The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) is charged with the duty of providing informed guidance on clinical practice (clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness) to patients and health professionals. The Appraisal Committee through its process of review of evidence advises NICE on the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of new and existing technologies and their appropriate use within the National Health Service in England and Wales. The appraisal process takes into account both published and unpublished evidence as well as input from professional and patient and carer groups when coming to its decisions. The appraisal of a new technology often has to bridge the gap between the evidence required for licensing purposes and that needed to provide pragmatic advice to practising clinicians. The appraisal of zanamivir (Relenza) is an excellent working example of this difficult and important process.

Antiviral Agents↗

Regulation of benzodiazepine prescribing practices: clinical implications.

In an effort to control prescription abuse of benzodiazepines, the New York State Department of Health (DOH) enacted a regulation requiring the use of triplicate prescriptions for these medications. DOH predicted that this regulation would reduce the overall abuse of benzodiazepines and eliminate widescale organized fraud and abuse without any negative impact or reduced availability to patients. Following implementation of the regulation, the authors reviewed all psychiatric emergency room cases and outpatient clinic walk-in evaluations over a 3-month period in an urban medical center and identified 59 cases in which the use of benzodiazepines was a significant presenting problem. Of these, 24 (41%) were judged to be directly related to the new triplicate regulation. In all but one of these cases the patient presented because of symptoms or concerns directly stemming from the refusal by a clinician to continue prescribing a benzodiazepine in a previously established pattern. Typically, abrupt discontinuation of benzodiazepine treatment led to a withdrawal syndrome and/or the unmasking of a previously treated anxiety disorder. In attempting to redress what are essentially criminal substance abuse problems through the regulation of legitimate clinical practice, regulatory agencies may ultimately deprive patients of appropriate, legitimate, and efficacious treatments.

Adult↗