Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cell Cycle Checkpoints”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Activated cell cycle checkpoints in epirubicin-treated breast cancer cells studied by BrdUrd-flow cytometry.

Genetic alterations, such as p53 mutations, may affect a tumour's response to chemotherapy. We have treated two human breast cancer cell lines that differ in p53 status with epirubicin in order to study if there are differences in cell cycle kinetic response. MCF-7 cells express wild-type p53, while SK-BR-3 cells express only a mutated form of p53. The transition of cells from one cell cycle stage to another was studied by a bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd)-flow cytometry (FCM) method. MCF-7 cells showed a block in the G1 phase after treatment with 50 nM epirubicin for 24 hours, in agreement with the actions of p53 at the G1 checkpoint. SK-BR-3 cells, on the other hand, progressed through the G1 checkpoint and were blocked in late S and G2 phases, presumably due to the activation of a later checkpoint. In addition, studies of the mRNA levels of p53 and its effector gene p21 revealed that although both cell lines expressed p53 mRNA, a marked difference in the mRNA levels of p21 was seen. A dramatic increase in the level of p21 mRNA was seen in epirubicin-treated MCF-7 cells, while no such increase was seen in SK-BR-3 cells.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice.

The recent discovery of checkpoint kinases has suggested the conservation of checkpoint mechanisms between yeast and mammals. In yeast, the protein kinase Chk1 is thought to mediate signaling associated with the DNA damage checkpoint of the cell cycle. However, the function of Chk1 in mammals has remained unknown. Targeted disruption of Chk1 in mice showed that Chk1(-/-) embryos exhibit gross morphologic abnormalities in nuclei as early as the blastocyst stage. In culture, Chk1(-/-) blastocysts showed a severe defect in outgrowth of the inner cell mass and died of apoptosis. DNA replication block and DNA damage failed to arrest the cell cycle before initiation of mitosis in Chk1(-/-) embryos. These results may indicate that Chk1 is indispensable for cell proliferation and survival through maintaining the G(2) checkpoint in mammals.

Alleles↗

Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls.

Before division, cells must ensure that they finish DNA replication, DNA repair and chromosome segregation. They do so by using feedback controls which can detect the failure to complete replication, repair or spindle assembly to arrest the progress of the cell cycle at one of three checkpoints. Failures in feedback controls can contribute to the generation of cancer.

Animals↗

cDNA cloning and gene mapping of a candidate human cell cycle checkpoint protein.

A family of proteins involved in cell cycle progression, DNA recombination, and the detection of DNA damage has been recently identified. One of the members of this family, human ATM, is defective in the cells of patients with ataxia telangiectasia and is involved in detection and response of cells to damaged DNA. Other members include Mei-41 (Drosophila melanogaster), Mec1p (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), and Rad3 (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), which are required for the S and G2/M checkpoints, as well as FRAP (Homo sapiens) and Torl/2p (S. cerevisiae), which are involved in a rapamycin-sensitive pathway leading to G1 cell cycle progression. We report here the cloning of a human cDNA encoding a protein with significant homology to members of this family. Three overlapping clones isolated from a Jurkat T-cell cDNA library revealed a 7.9-kb open reading frame encoding a protein that we have named FRP1 (FRAP-related protein) with 2644 amino acids and a predicted molecular mass of 301 kDa. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization and a full-length cDNA FRP1 clone, the FRP1 gene has been mapped to the chromosomal locus 3q22-q24. FRP1 is most closely related to three of the PIK-related kinase family members involved in checkpoint function--Mei-41, Mec1p, and Rad3--and as such may be the functional human counterpart of these proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The 1.7 A crystal structure of human cell cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1: implications for Chk1 regulation.

The checkpoint kinase Chk1 is an important mediator of cell cycle arrest following DNA damage. The 1.7 A resolution crystal structures of the human Chk1 kinase domain and its binary complex with an ATP analog has revealed an identical open kinase conformation. The secondary structure and side chain interactions stabilize the activation loop of Chk1 and enable kinase activity without phosphorylation of the catalytic domain. Molecular modeling of the interaction of a Cdc25C peptide with Chk1 has uncovered several conserved residues that are important for substrate selectivity. In addition, we found that the less conserved C-terminal region negatively impacts Chk1 kinase activity.

Catalytic Domain↗

The RCK1 and RCK2 protein kinase genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae suppress cell cycle checkpoint mutations in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

The protein kinase-encoding genes RCK1 and RCK2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been identified as suppressors of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cell cycle checkpoint mutations. Upon expression of these genes, radiation resistance is partially restored in S. pombe mutants with checkpoint deficiencies, but not in mutants with DNA repair defects. Some checkpoint mutants are sensitive to the DNA synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea, and this sensitivity is also suppressed by RCK1 and RCK2. The degree of suppression can be modulated by varying expression levels. Expression of RCK1 or RCK2 in S. pombe causes cell elongation and decelerated growth. Cells expressing these genes have a single nucleus and a 2n DNA content. We conclude that these genes act in S. pombe to prolong the G2 phase of the cell cycle.

Base Sequence↗

Activation of p53-mediated cell cycle checkpoint in response to micronuclei formation.

Inactivation of p53 tumor-suppressor leads to genetic instability and, in particular, to accumulation of cells with abnormal numbers of chromosomes. In order to better define the role of p53 function in maintaining genome integrity we investigated the involvement of p53 in the control of proliferation of micronucleated cells resulting from abnormal chromosome segregation. Using cell lines expressing temperature-sensitive (ts) p53 or containing p53 genetic suppressor element (p53-GSE) we showed that inhibition of p53 function increases the frequency of cells with micronuclei. Immunofluorescence study revealed that in REF52 cell cultures with both spontaneous and colcemid-induced micronuclei the proportion of p53-positive cells is considerably higher among micronucleated variants as compared with their mononuclear counterparts. Analysis of 12(1)ConA cells expressing the beta-galactosidase reporter gene under the control of a p53-responsive promoter showed activation of p53-regulated transcription in the cells with micronuclei. Importantly, the percentage of cells manifesting specific p53 activity in colcemid-treated cultures increased with an augmentation of the number of micronuclei in the cell. Activation of p53 in micronucleated cells was accompanied by a decrease in their ability to enter S-phase as was determined by comparative analysis of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (5-BrdU) incorporation by the cells with micronuclei and their mononuclear counterparts. Inhibition of p53 function in the cells with tetracycline-regulated p53 gene expression, as well as in the cells expressing ts-p53 or p53-GSE, abolished cell cycle arrest in micronucleated cells. These results along with the data showing no increase in the frequency of chromosome breaks in REF52 cells after colcemid treatment suggest the existence of p53-mediated cell cycle checkpoint(s) preventing proliferation of micronucleated cells derived as a result of abnormal chromosome segregation during mitosis.

Animals↗

Regulation of the Bub2/Bfa1 GAP complex by Cdc5 and cell cycle checkpoints.

During mitosis, a ras-related GTPase (Tem1) binds GTP and activates a signal transduction pathway to allow mitotic exit. During most of the cell cycle, Tem1 function is antagonized by a GTPase-activating protein complex, Bfa1/Bub2. How the Bfa1/Bub2 complex is regulated is not well understood. We find that Polo/Cdc5 kinase acts upstream of Bfa1/Bub2 in the mitotic exit network. Cdc5 phosphorylates Bfa1 and acts to antagonize Bfa1 function to promote mitotic exit. Bfa1 is regulated by multiple cell cycle checkpoints. The spindle assembly and spindle orientation checkpoints inhibit Bfa1 phosphorylation. DNA damage does not inhibit Bfa1 phosphorylation and instead causes a Rad53- and Dun1-dependent modification of Bfa1. Regulation of Bfa1 may therefore be a key step controlled by multiple checkpoint pathways to ensure a mitotic arrest.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Two alternative cell cycle checkpoint pathways differentially control DNA damage-dependent induction of MAG1 and DDI1 expression in yeast.

Eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage by activating damage checkpoint pathways, which arrest cell cycle progression and induce gene expression. In order to understand how damage checkpoints control the expression of DNA damage-inducible genes, the transcript level of two closely clustered genes, MAG1 and DDI1, was examined in a number of checkpoint mutants. We previously reported that MAG1 induction was abolished in pol2 and rad53 mutants, but not in the mec1-1 mutant. In this study, we found that mec1Delta and dun1Delta null mutants were defective in MAG1 induction, suggesting that MAG1 shares a common regulatory pathway with the RNR1,2,3,4 genes, which are also regulated by the POL2-MEC1-RAD53-DUN1 checkpoint pathway, and that the mec1-1 mutation probably represents a separation-of-function mutation. However, MAG1 is not activated in precisely the same way as the RNR genes, since mutations in CRT1, TUP1 and SSN6, which encode repressors of RNR genes, did not affect basal or induced expression of MAG1. In contrast, the DDI1 transcript level was not affected by any of the above checkpoint mutations. Interestingly, simultaneous inactivation of RAD53 or DUN1 with PDS1, a newly identified checkpoint gene, resulted in severe down-regulation of DDI1 expression, suggesting that DDI1 is controlled by two damage checkpoint pathways, one mediated by POL2-MEC1-RAD53-DUN1 and the other by CHK1-PDS1. On the other hand, deletion of TEL1, a structural homologue of MEC1, did not affect expression of MAG1, DDI1 or RNR3, suggesting that TEL1 plays no role in induction by DNA damage. Based on these and previous studies, we present a model for the role of checkpoint genes in transcriptional regulation in response to DNA damage.

Blotting, Northern↗

p53 does not control the spindle assembly cell cycle checkpoint but mediates G1 arrest in response to disruption of microtubule system.

p53 plays a critical role as a tumour-suppressor in restricting the proliferation of damaged cells, thus preventing formation of genetically altered cell clones. Its inactivation leads, in particular, to accumulation of polyploid and aneuploid cells. To elucidate the role of p53 in control of chromosome number, we analysed its participation in the cell cycle checkpoints controlling: (1) spindle assembly; and (2) G1-to-S transitions in cells with disintegrated microtubule cytoskeleton. Treatment with 8-10 ng/ml of colcemid causing no visible destruction of the spindle leads to arrest of metaphase-to-anaphase transition in both p53-positive and p53-negative murine fibroblasts, as well as in p53-positive REF52 cells and their counterparts (where the p53 function was inactivated by transduction of dominant-negative p53 fragment). Furthermore, p53-positive and p53-defective rodent and human cells showed no significant difference in kinetics of metaphase-to-interphase transitions in cultures treated with high colcemid doses preventing spindle formation. These data argue against the hypothesis that p53 is a key component of the spindle-assembly checkpoint. However, p53 mediates activation of the G1 checkpoint in response to depolymerization of microtubules in interphase cells. Treatment of synchronized G0/G1 cells with colcemid causes arrest of G1-to-S transition. Inactivation of the p53 function by transduction of dominant-negative p53 fragment abolishes the G1 checkpoint that prevents entry into S phase of cells with disrupted microtubules. Transduction of kinase-defective dominant-negative c- raf mutant or application of PD 098059, a specific inhibitor of MEK1, also abrogates the G1 cell cycle arrest in cells with disintegrated microtubule system. It seems that Raf-MAP-kinase signalling pathways are responsible for p53 activation induced by depolymerization of microtubules.

Animals↗

GM1492 human diploid skin fibroblasts lack the p53-dependent G1 cell-cycle checkpoint.

Recently, we reported that GM1492 human diploid skin fibroblasts derived from a Bloom's patient upon UV-C irradiation fail to increase p53 to a detectable level and nevertheless accumulate in the G1-phase of the cell-cycle. Here we show that in GM1492 cells other types of DNA-damaging agents also fail to induce p53 as well as WAF1, a p53-regulated gene product involved in G1 cell-cycle arrest. Furthermore, the p53-dependent G1 cell-cycle checkpoint is indeed defective in these cells: However, induction of GADD45 mRNA still occurs in GM1492 after irradiation with UV-C. Since GADD45 is known to inhibit the entry into S, these data suggest that the observed accumulation of GM1492 cells in G1 after UV-C irradiation occurs at the G1/S boundary and is due to an inhibition of initiation of DNA-replication.

Bloom Syndrome↗

Role of Pin1 in the regulation of p53 stability and p21 transactivation, and cell cycle checkpoints in response to DNA damage.

DNA damage leads to stabilization and accumulation of p53, which plays a pivotal role in transcriptional activation of p21 and cell cycle arrest. The increase in p53 stability depends critically on its phosphorylation on serine/threonine residues, including those preceding a proline (Ser(P)/Thr-Pro). The Ser(P)/Thr-Pro moiety exists in the two distinct cis and trans conformations and their conversion is catalyzed specifically by the prolyl isomerase Pin1. Pin1 regulates the conformation and function of certain phosphorylated proteins and plays an important role in cell cycle regulation, oncogenesis, and Alzheimer's disease. However, nothing is known about the role of Pin1 in DNA damage. Here we found that DNA damage enhanced the interaction between Pin1 and p53, which depended on the WW domain in Pin1 and Ser(33/46)-Pro motifs in p53. Furthermore, Pin1 regulates the stability of p53 and its transcriptional activity toward the p21 promoter. As a result, p53 and p21 barely increased after DNA damage in Pin1 knock-out embryonic fibroblasts or in neoplastic cells depleted of Pin1. Moreover, Pin1 null cells displayed significant defects in cell cycle checkpoints induced by DNA damage. These results demonstrate a new role of Pin1 in regulating p53 function during DNA damage.

Animals↗

Cellular responses to DNA damage: cell-cycle checkpoints, apoptosis and the roles of p53 and ATM.

'Checkpoint' controls arrest the cell cycle after DNA damage, allowing repair to take place before mutations can be perpetuated. In multicellular organisms, DNA damage can also induce apoptotic cell death, protecting the organism at the expense of the individual cell. How does a cell 'choose' between cycle arrest and death? Analysis of two human tumour suppressor proteins, p53 and the ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) gene product, may provide some answers.

Apoptosis↗

Cell cycle checkpoints in bacteria.

When DNA replication is interrupted in bacteria, a specific inhibitor (SfiA), a component of the SOS system, is synthesised which transiently blocks cell division. This is the prototype, dispensable, cell cycle checkpoint, essential for maximal survival under a particular stress. In contrast, no process specifically signalling the termination of chromosomal replication to activate the subsequent division event, which might be termed an essential checkpoint, has yet been demonstrated. In E coli, a specific mechanism is apparently required to reactivate replication forks blocked by damage, but its molecular basis is unclear. Induction of the stringent response, mediated by RelA via the level of ppGpp, presumably to optimise macromolecular synthesis according to the availability of nutrients, activates a control system which inhibits DNA replication in both E coli and B subtilis. In E coli, this blocks new rounds of initiation at oriC, although the mechanism is not clear. Conversely, initiation is not blocked in B subtilis, but replication is blocked apparently at a number of distinct sites 100-200 kb downstream and either side of oriC. This nutrient-dependent replicating checkpoint specifically requires RTP, the chromosomal terminator protein, and new evidence indicates that specific RTP binding sites may be involved in this post-initiation control mechanism. A similar post-initiation control mechanism appears to block replication reversibly after premature initiation in B subtilis, indicating that this system may have a dual function, limiting replication in starvation conditions and as a mechanism to compensate for premature initiations.

Bacteria↗

Repression of NF-kappaB impairs HeLa cell proliferation by functional interference with cell cycle checkpoint regulators.

NF-kappaB is an inducible transcription factor, which is regulated by interaction with inhibitory IkappaB proteins. Previous studies linked the activity of NF-kappaB to the proliferative state of the cell. Here we have analysed the function of NF-kappaB in the cell cycle. Inhibition of NF-kappaB in HeLa cells by stable overexpression of a transdominant negative IkappaB-alpha protein reduced cell growth. A kinetic analysis of the cell cycle revealed a retarded G1/S transition. The IkappaB-alpha overexpressing cell clones showed a decreased percentage of cells in the S phase and an impaired incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). The amounts of cyclins A, B1, D1, D3, and E were unchanged, but the G1-specific proteins cyclin D2 and cdk2 were strongly elevated in the IkappaB-alpha overexpressing cell clones. These cell clones also displayed an increase in cyclin D1-dependent kinase activity, pointing to a cell cycle arrest at the late G1 phase. IkappaB-alpha overexpression crosstalked to cell cycle checkpoints via a reduction of transcription factor p53 and elevation of p21WAF. Surprisingly, the IkappaB-alpha overexpressing cells showed an enrichment of c-Myc in the nucleoli, although the total amount of c-Myc protein was unchanged. These experiments identify an important contribution of the NF-kappaB/IkappaB system for the growth of HeLa cells.

Cell Cycle↗

Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint.

DPB11, a gene that suppresses mutations in two essential subunits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase II(epsilon) encoded by POL2 and DPB2, was isolated on a multicopy plasmid. The nucleotide sequence of the DPB11 gene revealed an open reading frame predicting an 87-kDa protein. This protein is homologous to the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad4+/cut5+ gene product that has a cell cycle checkpoint function. Disruption of DPB11 is lethal, indicating that DPB11 is essential for cell proliferation. In thermosensitive dpb11-1 mutant cells, S-phase progression is defective at the nonpermissive temperature, followed by cell division with unequal chromosomal segregation accompanied by loss of viability.dpb11-1 is synthetic lethal with any one of the dpb2-1, pol2-11, and pol2-18 mutations at all temperatures. Moreover, dpb11 cells are sensitive to hydroxyurea, methyl methanesulfonate, and UV irradiation. These results strongly suggest that Dpb11 is a part of the DNA polymerase II complex during chromosomal DNA replication and also acts in a checkpoint pathway during the S phase of the cell cycle to sense stalled DNA replication.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Evidence for a connection between the mismatch repair system and the G2 cell cycle checkpoint.

The human colon tumor cell line HCT116 is deficient in wild-type hMLH1, is defective in mismatch repair (MMR), exhibits microsatellite instability, and is tolerant to N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). Transferring a normal copy of hMLH1 on chromosome 3 into the cell line restores MMR activity, stabilizes microsatellite loci, and increases the sensitivity of the cell to MNNG. Previous studies in other cell lines tolerant to alkylating agents such as MNNG or N-methylnitrosourea have shown cross-tolerance to 6-thioguanine (6TG), leading to a hypothesis that tolerance to MNNG or 6TG may be the result of MMR deficiency. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effects of 6TG on the MNNG-tolerant, MMR-deficient HCT116 cell line and its MNNG-sensitive, MMR-proficient, MNNG-tolerant, and MMR-deficient derivatives. Continuous exposure to low doses of 6TG (0.31-1.25 micrograms/ml) had no apparent effect on colony-forming ability (CFA) in MNNG-tolerant, MMR-deficient cells, whereas MNNG-sensitive, MMR-proficient cells exhibited a dose-dependent decrease in CFA. Growth kinetics and cell cycle analysis revealed that the growth of 6TG-treated HCT116 + chr3 cells was arrested at G2 after exposure to low dose of 6TG. In contrast, the same exposure to 6TG did not induce G2 arrest but rather a G1 delay in HCT116 and HCT116 + chr2. To obtain further evidence for the role of MMR on 6TG and MNNG toxicity, we isolated an MNNG-resistant revertant clone, M2, from the MNNG-sensitive, MMR-proficient HCT116 + chr3 cell line and characterized the MMR activity, hMLH1 status, and 6TG response. The results showed that M2 cells lost MMR activity as well as the previously introduced normal hMLH1 gene. Restoration of the CFA of M2 and an absence of G2 arrest were observed after treatment with low doses of 6TG. These results suggest that the mismatch repair system interacts with the G2 checkpoint in response to 6TG or MNNG-induced DNA lesions. The results further suggest that any agent that induces DNA mispairs will cause G2 arrest in MMR-proficient cells but not in MMR-deficient cells.

Azaguanine↗