Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BONE CONDUCTION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical implications in calibration requirements in bone conduction standardisation.

Although international agreement has long been reached on a standard threshold for air conduction audiometry, no similar standard exists for bone conduction autiometry. It is argued that the techniques applied to the determination of the air conduction thresholds are not applicable to those for bone conduction which should instead be brought into line with ISO 1964 and not established independently. A pilot study has been carried out which shows that by adopting the new approach now advocated international agreement could be attained with the expenditure of minimal time and effort.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1989

Labyrinthine fistulae caused by cholesteatoma. Improved bone conduction by treatment.

In five cases of labyrinthine fistulae caused by extensive cholesteatoma, more than 30-dB improvement in bone conduction was observed in four postoperative cases and in one case after preoperative administration of antibiotics. In each case, a fistula of more than 2 mm in length was present at the lateral semicircular canal, and membranous labyrinthine wall was exposed when the cholesteatoma membrane was removed. These five cases were considered to be in the stage of serous labyrinthitis. The experience with these cases shows that emergent antibiotic treatment and surgery are appropriate for cases with reduced bone conduction in which labyrinthine fistula caused by cholesteatoma is suspected. In addition, as the reduction of bone conduction does not necessarily preclude the possibility of good postoperative hearing, tympanoplasty may be appropriate even for cases with markedly reduced bone conduction due to labyrinthine fistulae.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

A short latency vestibular evoked potential (VsEP) produced by bone-conducted acoustic stimulation.

In this paper data are presented from an experiment which provides evidence for the existence of a short latency, acoustically evoked potential of probable vestibular origin. The experiment was conducted in two phases using bone-conducted acoustic stimulation. In the first phase subjects were stimulated with 6-ms, 500-Hz tone bursts in order to obtain the threshold V(T) for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). It was confirmed that the difference between bone-conducted auditory and acoustic vestibular thresholds was slightly over 30 dB. The estimated threshold was then used as a reference value in the second part of the experiment to stimulate subjects over a range of intensities from -6 to +18 dB (re: V(T)). Averaged EEG recordings were made with eight Ag/AgCl electrodes placed on the scalp at Fpz, F3, F4, F7, F8, Cz, T3, and T4 according to the 10-20 system. Below V(T) auditory midlatency responses (MLRs) were observed. Above V(T) two additional potentials appeared: a positivity at about 10 ms (P10) which was maximal at Cz, and a negativity at about 15 ms (N15) which was maximal at Fpz. Extrapolation of the growth functions for the P10 and N15 indicated a threshold close to V(T), consistent with a vestibular origin of these potentials. Given the low threshold of vestibular acoustic sensitivity it is possible that this mode may make a contribution to the detection of and affective responses to loud low frequency sounds. The evoked potentials may also have application as a noninvasive and nontraumatic test of vestibular projections to the cortex.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1991

The limited accuracy of bone-conduction audiometry: its significance in medicolegal assessments.

Accurate bone-conduction testing with masking is always difficult, but for clinical purposes limited accuracy suffices. However, when assessing claimants for compensation, extreme care is needed since even small apparent air-bone gaps are sometimes translated into financial abatement. This paper sets out the stringent test conditions required to achieve adequate precision. It also indicates the inaccuracies inherent in such tests, and recommends procedures for interpreting the significance of bone-conduction thresholds.

Audiometry↗
PubMed2001

Bone-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with congenital atresia of the external auditory canal.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether vestibular evoked myogenic potentials from the sternocleidomastoid muscle in response to bone-conducted clicks and short tone-bursts can be used to assess vestibular apparatus function in patients with conductive hearing problems, particularly bilateral external auditory canal atresia. DESIGN: Evoked-potential responses to bone-conducted auditory stimuli were recorded from the sternocleidomastoid muscle of 15 patients (11 male and four female, aged 4--20 years) with congenital bilateral atresia of the external auditory canal, with or without the middle ear anomalies. SETTING: This study was conducted in the outpatient clinic of the Tokyo University Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Tokyo. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to clicks and short tone-bursts were recorded with surface electrodes over both sternocleidomastoids in each patient. RESULTS: In all patients, bone-conducted clicks and short tone-bursts evoked larger biphasic responses from the sternocleidomastoid ipsilateral to the stimulated ear. Short tone-bursts evoked vestibular evoked myogenic potentials with higher amplitude and better waveform morphology than clicks at the same subjective intensity. CONCLUSION: Loud auditory stimuli delivered by bone conduction can evoke myogenic potentials from the sternocleidomastoid. This method is a noninvasive, rapid, and convenient test for investigating the vestibular system function in patients with bilateral external auditory canal atresia, with or without the middle ear anomalies.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Occlusion effect: bone conduction speech audiometry using forehead and mastoid placement.

The occlusion effect (OE) was determined for bone conduction speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in 24 normally hearing subjects using forehead and mastoid placement. Results indicated that the OE was about 3 dB greater using forehead as opposed to mastoid placement. The intersubject variability of the OE is similar for the forehead and mastoid positions. The formula for effective masking for bone conduction speech should be equal to the minimum masking level for bone conduction speech plus the air-bone gap of the nontest ear plus 18 dB to account for the OE when using mastoid placement.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1987

A developmental study of bone conduction auditory brain stem response in infants.

Two studies, vibrator placement and masking, were performed to evaluate the developmental aspect of bone conduction auditory brain stem response (ABR) in human infants. Subject groups included newborns, 1-yr-olds, and adults. In the vibrator studies, ABRs were obtained from placements of the bone conduction vibrator on the frontal, occipital, and temporal bones. Results showed that temporal placements in neonates and 1-yr-olds produce significantly shorter wave V latencies of ABR than frontal or occipital placements. In adults, differences of wave V latencies from various vibrator placements were comparatively small. In the masking studies, ABRs were acquired from vibrator placements at the temporal bone in the presence of ipsilateral air conducted masking noise from the experimental groups. Results showed that interaural attenuations of bone conduction click stimuli are the largest in neonates, somewhat smaller from 1-yr-olds, and the smallest in adults. The findings of this research strongly suggest that temporal placements for bone conduction ABR should be used, in some instances, when testing infants and 1-yr-olds. The results of this study support the proposition that bone conduction ABR is a feasible and reliable diagnostic tool in testing infants.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Auditory brain stem responses to air- and bone-conducted clicks in the audiological assessment of at-risk infants.

Auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) to air- and bone-conducted clicks were used to assess the auditory status of 170 at-risk neonates. During the perinatal period, 20.6% (35/170 cases) of the at-risk infants failed ABRs to air-conducted clicks at 30 dB nHL in at least one ear. Ear-specific results indicated an initial failure rate of 15.0% (51/340 ears). Approximately two-thirds (32/51 ears) of these initial failures showed purely conductive deficits, whereas the remaining one-third (19/51 ears) involved suspected sensorineural components. Follow-up audiological evaluations were performed for 87.1% (148 cases) of these at-risk infants at 4 mo and/or 1 yr corrected age. Based on the initial tests and follow-up assessments, the tentative operating characteristics of ABRs to both air- and bone-conducted clicks for identification of sensorineural deficits in at-risk neonates were calculated. It was found that the ABR to bone-conducted clicks yielded better specificity, predictive value of positive results, and overall efficiency. It is suggested that the ABR to bone-conducted stimuli should be viewed as a valuable addition in the assessment of cochlear reserve in infants who fail a newborn auditory screening to air-conducted stimuli.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

[Masking in bone-conduction testing--proposal of ABC method].

A new strategic masking technique, namely the ABC method, has been developed. In performing this method of measuring thresholds of bone-conduction, the vibrator is placed at the forehead with both ears occluded by air-conduction earphones. One of the earphones is for masking noise and the other is a dummy which balances out the occlusive effect of the test ear against the nontest ear. The ABC method is based on the ABC rule that, in bone-conduction testing, the effective masking noise level necessary to block out the nontest ear can be calculated by a simple equation: right AC (A) + left AC (B)--unmasked BCu (C) under the assumption that the BCu belongs to the nontest ear. In some cases of hearing loss, the above noise level might produce overmasking, then an additive safety noise level, BCu + Interaural Attenuation, is employed. This method offers testers step by step directions which consist of indications of the noise level and a criterion for determining whether the measured bone-conduction is free from cross hearing and overmasking for the given configuration of air-conduction of both ears, BCu, and the masking noise level. Compared to the well known Plato method, in which measurements of thresholds are repeated at several masking noise levels in order to find a single bone-conduction threshold, the ABC method can essentially find the threshold at only one masking noise level. Therefore the ABC method makes it possible to save a great deal of time in performing bone conduction testing.

Audiometry↗
PubMed2002

Soft tissue movement and stress shielding do not affect bone ingrowth in the bone conduction chamber.

A variety of bone chambers are used in orthopedic research to study bone and tissue ingrowth in small and large animals. If different bone chambers are placed in one species, differences in bone ingrowth are observed. For instance, bone ingrowth in the bone conduction chamber (BCC) is high, but is low or absent in the repeated sampling bone chamber (RSBC). This difference may be explained by the design and fixation of these chambers. It is known that stress shielding and micromovement can influence bone formation. The objective of the study reported here was to determine whether stress shielding or soft tissue movement affected bone ingrowth in the BCC in the goat. Two types of caps were made, with fixation similar to that of the fixation plate of the RSBC. By placing the caps over the BCCs and fixating the caps directly to the tibial bone, the effect of stress shielding was studied. One cap was in direct contact with the bone chamber underneath, the other cap did not touch the chamber. This difference was used to observe whether movement of the soft tissue on top of the chamber and cap would affect bone ingrowth. Each limb received one control chamber without a cap and a chamber with a cap, either with or without contacting the BCC, yielding four implants per goat. After 12 weeks, bone and total tissue ingrowths were measured. Bone ingrowth was seen in 38 of 40 chambers. Total tissue and bone ingrowths were comparable between control chambers and BCCs with a cap, irrespective of type. Neither stress shielding, nor lack of movement of soft tissue affected bone ingrowth. Other factors in the design of the chambers were responsible for the difference in bone ingrowth between the BCC and the RSBC.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Confirmation of G. von Békésy's theory of paradoxical wave propagation along the cochlear partition by means of bone-conducted auditory brainstem responses.

In order to investigate the propagation time of the traveling wave in the cochlea after bone-conduction stimulation of the inner ear, bone-conducted auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded in 6 normally hearing subjects after masking the basal cochlear region using high-pass filtered noise. As in air-conducted ABRs, Jewett V wave latency is delayed corresponding to the propagation time of the traveling wave front traversing the desynchronized hair cell region. These results support the theory of paradoxical wave propagation proposed by von Békésy in 1952, who postulated that wave motion always starts from the stiffest part of the basilar membrane, independent of the location of the vibrating force. In addition, we also found a latency delay of the Jewett V wave of bone-conducted ABRs in 8 patients with high-frequency hearing loss which corresponded to the severity of their hearing impairment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1982

Reliability of bone-conducted electrocochleography. A clinical study.

The correlation between pure-tone bone conduction thresholds (BC) and thresholds obtained by electrocochleography with bone conducted stimulation (BC-ECoG) for 1, 2, 4 and 8 kHz was studied in 26 ears due for ear surgery. The correlations proved to be statistically highly significant and the results lend support to the conclusion that BC-ECoG can be considered to be well adapted for clinical use in cases where conventional audiometry has failed to reveal the capacity of the cochlea.

Audiometry↗
PubMed1998

Air- and bone-conduction brainstem auditory evoked potentials and flash visual evoked potentials in cats.

OBJECTIVE: To document normal values for air- and bone-conducted brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) and for flash visual evoked potentials (VEP) in cats. ANIMALS: 10 mixed-breed cats (5 males) with normal physical, neurologic, otoscopic, and funduscopic examination results. PROCEDURE: BAEP in response to air- and bone-conducted click stimuli and VEP in response to flash stimuli were recorded to document species normative data. Mean and SD values were calculated for amplitudes and latencies of 4 peaks in the BAEP in response to air- and bone-conducted stimuli, and for latencies to 5 peaks and the 4 associated peak-to-peak amplitudes in the VEP. RESULTS: BAEP peak latencies increased and peak amplitudes decreased with decreasing stimulus intensity. Latencies were shorter for bone-conducted stimuli owing to the shorter transit time to the cochlea through bone, compared with air, but there were no differences for interpeak latencies. The BAEP and VEP recordings were similar to those reported for cats in other reports and were similar to those seen in other species. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Normative data will permit performance of noninvasive electrodiagnostic evaluation of feline auditory and visual systems.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1977

[Bone conduction changes in secretory otitis media (author's transl)].

In serous and secretory otitis media a reduction of bone conduction frequently exists besides the loss of air conduction. In 304 audiograms of ears with serous and viscous fluid in the middle ear there was a depression of the bone conduction between 15 and 40 dB in 40%. This bone conduction loss was reversible after the aeration of the tympanic cavity. That means that we deal with a false nerve deafness in many of these cases.

Bone Conduction↗
PubMed1992

High-frequency audiometry. Masking in electric bone-conduction audiometry.

Recently, the 'electric bone-conduction' (EBC) audiometer (Audimax 500) has been used to measure high-frequency (HF) hearing. With this audiometer stimulation is binaural. No commercial masking method was available. In this study, white noise from a Madsen OB822 audiometer and presented via Sony MDR-V4 dynamic earphones, was used for masking. The masking and cross-hearing effect was measured in 8 unilaterally deaf subjects and the masking procedure was tested with 104 young normal-hearing subjects. The results showed that the EBC signals can be masked with air-conduction signals, and thus, the EBC measurements reflect monaural thresholds. The minimum masking level was 50-60 dB SPL in the HF range. There were no cross-hearing problems in the HF range with the earphones used. At the frequencies 0.5-14 kHz, the better ear's masked EBC thresholds were on the average 2.6 dB (range 0-4.5 dB) poorer, compared with the binaural EBC thresholds, indicating a binaural summation effect.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2004

Further evidence for a fluid pathway during bone conduction auditory stimulation.

This study was designed to evaluate the suggestion that during bone vibrator stimulation on skull bone (bone conduction auditory stimulation), a major connection between the site of the bone vibrator and the inner ear is a fluid pathway. A series of experiments were conducted on pairs of animals (rats or guinea pigs). The cranial cavities of each pair of animals were coupled by means of a saline filled plastic tube sealed into a craniotomy in the skull of each animal. In response to bone conduction click stimulation to the skull bone of animal I, auditory nerve-brainstem evoked responses could be recorded in animal II. Various procedures showed that these responses were initiated in animal II in response to audio-frequency sound pressures generated within the cranial cavity of animal I by the bone conduction stimulation and transferred to the cranial cavity of animal II through the fluid in the plastic tube: they were not responses to air conducted sounds generated by the bone vibrator, were not induced in animal II by vibrations conveyed to it by the plastic tube and were not electrically conducted activity from animal I. Exposing the fluid in the tube to air was not accompanied by any change in threshold. These experiments confirm that during bone conduction stimulation on the skull, audio-frequency sound pressures (alternating condensations and rarefactions) can be conveyed by a fluid pathway to the cochlea and stimulate it.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1989

Validity of bone conduction stimulated ABR, MLR and otoacoustic emissions.

The present study considers the validity of objective auditory investigation via bone conduction. Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) and Middle Latency Responses (MLR) were recorded in response to a bone vibrator stimulation with or without continuous bilateral air white noise masking. In all cases, such masking was found to result in an absence of recorded evoked potentials. It shows that under bone-conducted stimulation the evoked potential recorded is purely auditory, with no additional mechanical somatosensory component. In a further study, the feasibility of oto-acoustic emissions (OAEs) via bone conduction is demonstrated. These OAEs are, for a given subject, comparable to those found for air-transmission stimulation.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparative study of alternative bone-conduction calibration methods.

The accepted instrument for calibrating the bone-conduction section of an audiometer is the artificial mastoid. For a variety of reasons, alternative calibration methods are in general use. Three common methods are: (1) the input voltage method; (2) the real-ear threshold method using normal-hearing listeners; and (3) the real-ear threshold method using subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. The present investigation compared these methods for both accuracy and efficiency. There were no significant differences in accuracy found among the three calibration methods. Substantial differences in efficiency were noted, however. When accuracy and efficiency are considered, the input voltage method appears to be the best alternative method for calibrating the bone-conduction system of an audiometer.

Adolescent↗