Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “APPENDICITIS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

The anatomy of appendicitis.

Acute appendicitis is a common disorder and, ideally, should be diagnosed prior to the onset of gangrene or perforation. Nonetheless, the goal of early diagnosis remains elusive. In a prospective study, 100 appendectomies were performed for suspected acute appendicitis over 19 months. The location of the appendix was noted by the operating surgeon and was listed as anterior intraperitoneal, retrocecal, pericolic gutter, retroileal, pelvic, or retroperitoneal. The latter four positions were regarded as sites in which the appendix was hidden from the anterior parietal peritoneum. Fifteen patients did not have appendicitis. Of the 85 inflamed appendices, 25 were indurated, 19 were suppurative, and 41 were gangrenous or perforated. Patients with gangrene or perforation were more likely to have pain and tenderness at a site other than the right lower quadrant and had a higher mean heart rate on admission than patients with simple appendicitis, but there were no other differences in symptoms, signs, or laboratory findings among the groups. The appendix was in a hidden location in 15 per cent of patients with simple appendicitis or without appendicitis, compared with 68 per cent of patients with gangrenous or perforative appendicitis (P < 0.001). Complications were more frequent, and hospital stays were longer in patients with advanced appendicitis (P < 0.001). Patients and physicians were equally responsible for delays in treatment, but the high incidence of hidden appendices in those with advanced appendicitis resulted in less severe symptoms and signs than expected. Anatomic variations in the location of the appendix are often responsible for delays in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Abdominal Pain↗

Escherichia coli septicemia in nonperforated appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between nonperforated appendicitis and Escherichia coli septicemia, and the frequency with which blood cultures are obtained in the clinical setting of appendicitis. DESIGN: Three case reports of E coli septicemia and nonperforated appendicitis and a retrospective survey. SETTING: Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Tex, a primary care and tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All children admitted in a 2-year period with a diagnosis of appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Preoperative blood cultures were obtained in 20 (21%) of 96 patients with histologic evidence of appendicitis. Fifty percent of the patients had gross or microscopic evidence of appendiceal perforation. Twelve (25%) of the 48 patients with perforated appendicitis had blood cultures obtained before the initiation of antimicrobial therapy, and in two of these patients (17%) the results were positive. Blood cultures were drawn before antibiotic therapy in four (8%) of the 48 patients with nonperforated appendicitis, and in two of these the results were positive. The blood culture isolates (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and E coli) were the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nonperforated appendicitis and septicemia may be more common than formerly appreciated. Only a prospective study can determine the true incidence of septicemia in children with perforated or nonperforated appendicitis.

Adolescent↗

Routine interval appendectomy is not justified after initial nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: The role of interval appendectomy (IA) after an episode of acute appendicitis is debated. HYPOTHESIS: Patients treated nonoperatively for acute appendicitis do not require routine IA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using discharge abstract data. SETTING: Twelve regional Kaiser Permanente hospitals in Southern California. PATIENTS: A total of 32 938 patients were hospitalized with acute appendicitis. INTERVENTIONS: Appendectomy or nonoperative treatment with or without abscess drainage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospitalization for recurrent appendicitis or IA. RESULTS: The type of appendicitis was abscess in 7% of patients, peritonitis in 18%, and no peritonitis or abscess in 75%. Emergency appendectomy was performed in 31 926 (97%) patients. Nonoperative treatment was used initially in 1012 patients (3%). Of these, 148 (15%) had an IA and the remaining 864 (85%) did not. Thirty-nine patients (5%) recurred after a median follow-up of 4 years. Using Cox regression, sex had a slight influence on recurrent appendicitis (hazard ratio males vs females = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.27-0.99, P = .05). Age, Charlson comorbidity index, type of appendicitis, or percutaneous abscess drainage had no influence on recurrence. Median length of hospital stay was 4 days for the admission for recurrent appendicitis compared with 6 days for the IA admission (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with acute appendicitis undergo appendectomy initially. For those treated nonoperatively, the recurrence rate is low. Routine IA after initial successful nonoperative treatment is not justified and should be abandoned.

Abdominal Abscess↗

C-reactive protein and leukocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein and its possible advantage, if any, over leukocyte counts in acute appendicitis in children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 124 children (72 males) with a mean age of 9.3 (range, 2-14) years operated on under a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis, confirmed by pathologic examination of the removed appendix, was then correlated with C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and a combination of both C-reactive protein and leukocyte count, with a logistic regression model. C-reactive protein serum measurements were performed by an immunoturbidimetric test. The patients were divided into two groups according to the pathologic features of the removed appendix: Group A (n = 104), patients with acute appendicitis, and Group B (n = 20), patients without acute appendicitis. To assess the accuracy of C-reactive protein, leukocyte counts, and a combination of both parameters, receiver operating characteristic curves were used. The areas under the curve were compared using the maximum likelihood estimation method. RESULTS: There were 95 cases (76.6 percent) of nonperforated appendicitis, 9 cases (7.3 percent) of perforated appendicitis and 20 cases (16.1 percent) of normal appendix. Mean C-reactive protein in Group A was 4.3 (standard deviation, 6.6) and in Group B was 1.2 (standard deviation, 1.7; P = 0.03). The C-reactive protein and leukocyte count values were correlated with the pathologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Mean C-reactive protein values increase as the pathologic inflammation type progresses (P = 0.007). The C-reactive protein receiver operating characteristic curve shows that the C-reactive protein value with highest accuracy was 1.7 mg/dl. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates calculated in the 1.7 cutoff were 58, 80, and 83.8 percent, respectively. A comparison of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrates that C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and the combination of both tests all have a good diagnostic value but without any significant difference (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In children, 1) serum C-reactive protein is increased in acute appendicitis; 2) such increase is related to the severity of the appendiceal inflammation; and 3) although serum C-reactive protein has an adequate diagnostic accuracy, neither individually nor in combination with the leukocyte count is it significantly better than the leukocyte count alone.

Appendicitis↗

[Chronic appendicitis as an independent clinical entity].

INTRODUCTION: Chronic appendicitis is not generally accepted as an independent clinical entity. The diagnosis is often made only after histological analysis when the patient has undergone appendectomy in a case of persistent or recurrent pain. The objectives of this prospective study were to analyse the incidence of chronic appendicitis among our patients, to compare demographic and clinical data with histological results and to evaluate long-term follow-up after appendectomy. METHODS: Between November 1995 and February 1998, 322 patients underwent appendectomy due to typical symptoms of appendicitis. All appendices were analysed macroscopically by the surgeon and histologically by two independent pathologists. Furthermore, demographic data, standard blood results, Alvarado score, body mass index, operation time, complications, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. In April 2001, a long-term follow-up survey evaluated the present complaints of all operated patients. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients showed clinical signs of non-acute appendicitis. However, 26.8% of these appendices histologically revealed an acute inflammation. In the subgroup of histologically non-acute appendicitis, 4.9% of the appendices were inconspicuous, 42.0% chronically inflamed and 50.6% fibrotic. Compared to that, the macroscopic examination by the surgeon resulted in a 93.5% specificity and a 77.8% sensitivity. The preoperative period of pain was significantly longer (7 days) compared to patients with acute appendicitis (0.5 days). White blood count (8.700 versus 13.400) and preoperative Alvarado score (4 versus 7 points) were significantly lower, the hospital stay significantly shorter (3 versus 4 days). A specificity of 89.9% and a positive likelihood ratio of 4.64 were calculated for an optimal cut-off value of 7 days for preoperative pain. At a median of 50.2 months after the operation, 93.1% of the patients were asymptomatic, and five patients reported persistent pain in the right lower quadrant. CONCLUSIONS: Three quarter of all patients with pain in the right lower quadrant but no significant signs of inflammation showed the histological criteria for chronic appendicitis. However, histology revealed signs of an acute inflammation in 25% of patients. An optimal cut-off value of 7 days preoperative period of pain was able to suggest a histologically non-acute appendicitis with a high specificity and a high positive predictive value. More than 93% of these patients were asymptomatic in their long-term follow-up. Chronic appendicitis must be assumed in cases of recurrent or persistent pain longer than 7 days and an elective appendectomy has to be recommended.

Adult↗

[Current therapy of complicated appendicitis].

A significant number of complications in acute appendicitis develop due to delayed or even missed diagnosis. Potentially every patient can be affected due to a distinct feature of appendicitis--the rapidity with which the inflammation passes through the different stages. Even after a few hours, gangrenous appendicitis with impending overt perforation can have developed. In many cases, the term complicated appendicitis may be less significant than implied because, e.g., the rapidly developed perforation can be treated by appendectomy, which rarely presents a surgical challenge. However, every perforation of a hollow viscus in the abdomen leads to peritonitis of different degrees, which untreated can end lethally. The often cited statement of Dieu la Foy from the last but one century "no patient has to die from appendicitis" remains a surgical dream not quite fulfilled. Occasionally even today, patients with comorbidity die from the sequelae of appendicitis, i.e., high-risk groups including the very young and the very old and immunosuppressed patients. These patients should receive special attention when the diagnosis of appendicitis is considered. By definition, complicated appendicitis includes perforation of the appendix, empyema or abscess formation, and finally fecal peritonitis. The surgical procedure chosen and when to add supportive measures will depend on the specific complication present. Early or immediate appendectomy, i.e., the urgent indication to operate, is a generally accepted concept in the therapy of acute appendicitis. Even in complicated cases, the aim is just one operative procedure or if need be only the application of antibiotics.

Abdominal Abscess↗

[Effect of the surgeon on treatment quality in acute appendicitis].

The quality of the surgical therapy in cases of acute appendicitis is influenced by the rate of perforating appendicitis, the rate of bland appendicitis and the perioperative morbidity. During a prospective follow-up 271 patients were treated at our department between 1 April 1993 and 30 July 1996. The rate of perforating appendicitis was 3.7%, and that of bland appendicitis was 19.6%. The rate of perforating appendicitis did not differ significantly according surgeon, who decided to operate. However, the number of patients with bland appendicitis did differ significantly among different operators. There were also significant differences in the rate of wound infections. No correlation was found between the rates of perforating and bland appendicitis was not found. In summary the operator affects the quality of the surgical treatment in cases of suspected appendicitis by differences in the timing and performance of the surgical procedure.

Acute Disease↗

Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

This study evaluated the usefulness of routine, nonfocused intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Also evaluated was the diagnostic value of several findings that were clinically associated with acute appendicitis. Although a number of studies have shown various techniques using CT to be accurate in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, few studies have focused on CT with using only intravenous contrast material. Computed tomography scan criteria for acute appendicitis have been established chiefly on the basis of appendiceal findings. We, on the other hand, have often observed the following associated conditions during appendectomy: ascites, paresis of the intestine, or thickening of adjacent tissues. In this study, we reviewed the intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scans of 78 patients who had been diagnosed as having acute appendicitis and had subsequently undergone surgery. We also compared the CT scans with patients' surgical and histological findings. As a way of evaluating clinical ancillary signs, we identified and analyzed individual CT findings that included abnormal appendix, calcified appendicolith, ascites, dilated intestine, and cecal wall thickening. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in surgical cases were found to be 91.9%, 87.5%, and 91.0%, respectively. Individual findings except for abnormal appendix were not significantly common among patients who had acute appendicitis. However, more positive findings were observed in patients who had appendicitis than in those who had normal appendixes. Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scan is a useful technique in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The plurality of ancillary signs in CT scans also appears to be a helpful indicator in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗

New insights into the pathogenesis of appendicitis based on immunocytochemical analysis of early immune response.

Although appendicitis is the most common condition requiring emergency surgery, the pathogenesis of this disease is poorly understood. In this study, local immune responses in acute appendicitis were investigated, using an experimental rabbit model, as well as in different grades of appendicitis in humans. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) and plasma cell isotypes infiltration was measured in 24 New Zealand-bred white rabbits following experimental obstruction of the appendiceal lumen for periods ranging from 30 minutes to 24 hours. Significant infiltration of PMNs, IgM, and IgG plasma cells was noted at 30 minutes following obstruction, and IgA plasma cells were noted at 2 hours after obstruction. The immunopathological features observed in the study of human appendicitis clearly demonstrated the role of plasma cell infiltration in the immunopathogenesis of appendicitis. IgA and IgG plasma cells were significantly increased in the lamina propria of both focal and acute suppurative appendicitis, compared with controls (P less than .001). In focal appendicitis, in which the focus of inflammation is confined to only a few serial sections, the increased IgA and IgG plasma cell infiltration was present throughout the entire length of the resected organ. The possibility, as seen in this study, that antigen stimulation of the effector immune system could give rise to appendicitis, provides new insights into the diversity of inflammatory responses contributing to diseases of the intestinal tract. This previously unrecognised concept in the pathogenesis of appendicitis requires further elucidation of the stimulating agent, and in particular the T-cell recognition process.

Animals↗

Appendicitis in children: current therapeutic recommendations.

Wound infection is the most common source of morbidity in appendicitis. Most recent pediatric series use protocols of preoperative antibiotics with aerobic and anaerobic coverage, intraoperative lavage, no peritoneal or wound drains, and continuation of antibiotics postoperatively with complicated appendicitis. There still remains controversy concerning skin closure and the duration of antibiotic therapy. We report the results of a prospective protocol followed over 2 years with 420 children. The protocol was designed to determine whether the skin could be closed primarily in all patients undergoing appendectomy. Preoperatively all patients received triple antibiotics (ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin) that were continued postoperatively for two doses if there was a normal appendix or simple acute appendicitis, for at least 3 days with gangrenous appendicitis, and at least 5 days with perforated appendicitis. Antibiotics were continued if the patient remained febrile or had a white count greater than 10,000. No drains were used and the skin was closed primarily. The overall infectious complication rate was 1.0% (4/420). Among those with a normal appendix or simple acute appendicitis there were no infectious complications. Among those with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis there were 1.7% wound infections (2/117) and 1.7% intraabdominal abscesses (2/117). Duration of hospitalization was 2.1 days (range, 1 to 5 days) after simple acute appendicitis and 6.9 days (range, 3 to 40 days) after gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. These results set new standards in terms of wound management, infectious complications, and length of hospital stay.

Adolescent↗

Appendicitis in children treated by pediatric versus general surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric appendicitis is treated by both pediatric and general surgeons. We investigated whether specialty-dependent differences existed in patients' characteristics and outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of 465 consecutive children treated for appendicitis at a university-affiliated children's hospital during a 28-month period was performed. Characteristics and outcomes of patients treated by pediatric surgeons were compared with those treated by general surgeons. Rates of misdiagnosis, postoperative readmission, wound infection, intraabdominal infection, and duration of hospital stay were considered primary outcomes and analyzed by chi-square, Fisher's exact test, or Student's t-test where appropriate. Hospital charges were considered secondary outcomes and analyzed by Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Three hundred four children (65%) were treated by pediatric surgeons and 161 (35%) by general surgeons. Pediatric-surgeon patients were younger (8.3 +/- 3.6 versus 13.2 +/- 3.1 years, p < 0.001), and more likely to have gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (54% versus 33%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the normal appendix rate (pediatric surgeon, 4.3% versus general surgeon, 5.6%, p = 0.53). In patients with simple and complicated appendicitis, there were no significant differences between pediatric and general surgeons in readmissions, postoperative complications, or hospital stay. Median hospital charges were not significantly different for complicated appendicitis, but were lower for pediatric-surgeon patients with simple appendicitis (10,735 dollars versus 11,613 dollars, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric surgeons treat younger children with more severe appendicitis. There are no specialty-dependent differences in clinical outcomes for simple or complicated appendicitis. Hospital charges are lower for simple appendicitis treated by pediatric surgeons.

Adolescent↗

Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is generally assumed that delayed diagnosis of acute appendicitis results in higher morbidity but this assumption is not strongly supported in the literature. We attempt to define the effect of patient and physician delay on the outcome of patients with acute appendicitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 486 patients admitted between 1980 and 1992. Patient delay in presenting to a physician and surgeon delay from hospital admission to operation were studied in relation to stage of disease at operation as well as to postoperative complications. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 10% of cases with simple acute appendicitis versus about 20% of cases with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (P <0.001). The mean patient delay from onset of symptoms to presentation to a physician was 1.7 days in simple acute appendicitis versus 2.3 days in gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (P <0.001). Mean surgeon delay was 13.6 hours in simple acute appendicitis versus 14.5 hours in advanced appendicitis (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Delay in patient presentation adversely affects the stage of disease in acute appendicitis and leads to increased incidence of infectious complications and to prolonged hospital stay. Conversely, physician delay does not affect the stage of disease. A surgeon's decision to observe patients in hospital in order to clarify the diagnosis is justified, as it does not adversely affect outcome.

Acute Disease↗

Appendicitis is a place for clinical judgement.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis remains a clinical entity. Reports of negative appendectomies range from 9% to 40%. The goal of this study is to evaluate clinical performance and factors associated with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: Records of patients with a preoperative or postoperative diagnosis of appendicitis between January 1994 and December 1997 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and paraclinical data were collected. Multivariate analysis was carried out by logistical regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-seven consecutive cases were reviewed (male 132, female 105). The mean age was 31.4 +/- 16.8. Twenty-three cases had other surgical conditions. In the remaining cases (n = 214), 127 (59.4%) had noncomplicated appendicitis, 69 (32.2%) had complicated appendicitis, and 18 (8.4%) had negative exploration. Delays occurring before first medical consultation were significantly longer in patients with complicated appendicitis (3.30 days) and negative exploration (3.00 days) compared to patients with noncomplicated appendicitis (1.24 days) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable rates of negative appendix and complicated appendicitis can be obtained from clinical data. The presence of complicated appendicitis is primarily associated with a longer delay before first medical consultation.

Adult↗

Probability of appendicitis before and after observation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine patients with abdominal pain for changes in probability of appendicitis during observation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated community hospital. METHODS: 252 patients with abdominal pain who were examined underwent short-term (10.4 hours) observation (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7, 12.1) before the decision to operate during a one-year period. Alvarado's scoring system and a probability-of-diagnosis nomogram were used to assign scores and estimate probability of appendicitis. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In the study group, mean score of patients with appendicitis increased after observation from 6.8 (95% CI, 6.2, 7.4) to 7.8 (95% CI, 7.3, 8.3), corresponding to a change in probability of appendicitis from 50% to 65%. Mean score of patients without appendicitis decreased from 3.8 (95% CI, 3.5, 4.1) to 1.6 (95% CI, 1.58, 1.62), corresponding to a change in probability from 35% to 22%. The difference between mean scores for patients with and without appendicitis increased from 2.6 (95% CI, 2.0, 3.2) to 6.2 (95% CI, 6.15, 6.25) during observation. The study group initially had intermediate probability of appendicitis (score, 4.35; 95% CI, 4.04, 4.66) compared with high probability for patients who went directly to surgery after their initial evaluation (63 patients; score, 7.59; 95% CI, 7.05, 8.73) and low probability for patients with abdominal pain who were sent home after their initial evaluation without observation or surgery (2,097 patients; score, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.48, 2.26). CONCLUSION: In this group of patients with intermediate initial probability of appendicitis, observation improved the ability to distinguish patients with from those without appendicitis.

Abdominal Pain↗

Appendicitis: evaluation by Tc-99m leukocyte scan.

Diagnosing appendicitis may be difficult. We report the use of a new technetium-99m-albumin colloid white blood cell (TAC-WBC) scan in the evaluation of appendicitis. In a synthesis requiring 75 minutes, autologous neutrophils and macrophages from 40 mL of whole blood were labelled with technetium-99m-albumin colloid and administered to 100 patients with possible appendicitis. The entire process, from labelling the cells to completion of the scan took a maximum of 5 1/4 hours. Two patients had second scans on separate hospitalizations. Twenty-six patients had appendicitis; 12 had perforations, five of whom had an abscess. Eighty-five scans were read as either positive or negative for appendiceal pathology with a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 92%, and an accuracy of 92% in diagnosing appendicitis. Seventeen scans were indeterminant; eight of these patients had appendicitis. The value of the TAC-WBC scan in the evaluation of appendicitis lies in its ability to be used emergently, its high negative predictive value for men and women (NPV = 97%), and its high positive predictive value for men (PPV = 93%). At present, the scan does not appear to be reliable in diagnosing appendicitis in women (PPV = 43%). It is most useful in those patients in whom diagnosis is uncertain, and should not be used in patients with clear-cut appendicitis in whom its use will delay definitive surgical care.

Abscess↗

Is there a role for leukocyte and CRP measurements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly?

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is still difficult and the results are unsatisfactory in three particular patient groups: in children, in fertile-age women and in elderly patients. As our population ages, the challenge for expedient diagnosis and intervention in older age groups will become more and more significant. The present study aimed at clarifying the role of leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly. In particular, are there patients with acute appendicitis but unelevated leukocyte count and CRP? METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive elderly patients underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. The mean leukocyte count and CRP value were calculated in patients with an uninflamed appendix (group A) and in those with acute appendicitis (group B). The percentages of patients with: (1) both values unelevated; (2) only leukocyte count elevated; (3) only CRP value elevated; (4) both values elevated were calculated within the groups A and B. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in leukocyte counts or CRP values between patients with an uninflamed appendix (group A) and those with acute appendicitis (group B). When the patients were divided into the four subgroups, the most conspicuous finding was that group B (acute appendicitis, n = 73) contained no patients with both values unelevated. CONCLUSIONS: Although elevated leukocyte count and CRP value cannot effectively establish the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly, unelevated values exclude it. Accordingly, appendectomy is not recommended to be performed in an elderly patient with unelevated leukocyte count and CRP value, although clinical symptoms and signs indicate acute appendicitis.

Acute Disease↗

Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present work was to study the preoperative leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) values in three groups of patients operated on for a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis with different findings at appendicectomy: an uninflamed appendix, uncomplicated acute appendicitis or complicated acute appendicitis. In particular, patients with acute appendicitis but a normal leucocyte count and CRP level were sought. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the mean preoperative leucocyte count and CRP value in 100 consecutive patients with an uninflamed appendix (group A), in 100 consecutive patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (group B) and in 100 consecutive patients with complicated acute appendicitis (group C) were calculated. The numbers of patients with (1) both values normal, (2) only leucocyte count raised, (3) only CRP level raised and (4) both values raised were calculated in each of the three groups. RESULTS: The increase in leucocyte count was an early marker of appendiceal inflammation, whereas the CRP value increased markedly only after appendiceal perforation or abscess formation. Group A (uninflamed appendix) contained 24 patients in whom both values were normal. Neither group B (uncomplicated acute appendicitis) nor group C (complicated acute appendicitis) contained any patient with both values in the normal range. CONCLUSION: Acute appendicitis is very unlikely when both the leucocyte count and CRP value are normal.

Acute Disease↗

Appendicitis 2000: variability in practice, outcomes, and resource utilization at thirty pediatric hospitals.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To improve clinical results and resource utilization in the care of appendicitis in children, the authors examined the current practice and outcomes of 30 pediatric hospitals. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database consists of comparative data from 30 free-standing Children's hospitals. The study population of 3,393 children was derived from the database by selecting the "Diagnosis Related Group Code" for appendicitis (APRDRGv12 164), ages 0 to 17 years, using discharges between October 1, 1999 and September 30, 2000. Data are expressed as the range and median for individual hospital outcomes. RESULTS: The nonpositive appendectomy rate ranged from 0 to 17% at the 30 hospitals (median, 2.6%). Ruptured appendicitis varied from 20% to 76% (median, 36.5%). The median length of stay (LOS) for nonruptured appendicitis was 2 days (range, 1.4 to 3.1 days), ruptured appendicitis varied from 4.4 to 11 days (median, 6 days). The median readmission rate within 14 days was 4.3% (0 to 10%). Laparoscopic appendectomy varied from 0 to 95% in the 30 hospitals (mean, 31%) The LOS did not vary significantly in laparoscopic versus open for nonruptured (2.3 v 2.0 days) or ruptured appendicitis (5.5 v 6.2 days). Days on antibiotics for ruptured appendicitis ranged from 4.6 to 7.9 days (median, 5.9 days) Children receiving any study varied from 18% to 89% (median, 69%). Ultrasound scan and computed tomography (CT) were comparable in both nonruptured (13% ultrasound scan v 14%) and ruptured appendicitis (14% ultrasound scan v 21% CT). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability in practice patterns and resource utilization exists in the management of acute appendicitis in pediatric hospitals. Clinical outcomes could be improved by collaborative initiatives to adopt evidence-based best practices.

Acute Disease↗