Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “AMPUTATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Long-term prognosis after healed amputation in patients with diabetes.

In this prospective study, mortality, rehabilitation, and new amputations on the same or on the contralateral leg were studied in 189 patients with diabetes who had achieved healing of an index amputation. Ninety-three patients had achieved healing after an index minor (below the ankle) and 96 after an index major (above the ankle) amputation, precipitated by a foot ulcer. The healing time was 29 weeks (range, 3-191 weeks) with a minor amputation and 8 weeks (range, 3-104 weeks) with a primary major amputation. The mortality 1, 3, and 5 years after the index amputation was 15%, 38%, and 68%, respectively, and was higher in patients who had achieved healing after major amputation than in patients achieving healing after minor amputation. The rate of new amputations after 1, 3, and 5 years of observation was 14%, 30%, and 49%, respectively. There was no difference among patients with an index minor and those with an index major amputation. The rate of new major amputations was 9%, 13%, and 23%, respectively, and was higher in patients with an index major amputation. Eighty-five percent of new amputations were precipitated by a foot ulcer. Patients living independently before the index amputation returned to living independently more often after a minor than a major amputation (93% versus 61%). One year after the index amputation, 70% of patients who had achieved healing after having a minor amputation and who could walk 1 km or more before amputation had regained this walking capacity, compared with 19% of patients having a major amputation. Seventy percent of patients with an index transtibial amputation who could walk before amputation were fitted with a prosthesis, and 52% were using it regularly. Patients with diabetes who had an index major amputation had a higher mortality, an equal rate of new amputation, and a lower rehabilitation potential than did patients who had an index minor amputation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A reappraisal of a modified through-knee amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Through-knee amputation provides a longer lever arm and improved muscle control of the limb compared with above-knee amputation. Through-knee amputation also allows use of a total end-bearing prosthesis, which avoids the ischial pressure and suspension belts required of the above-knee amputation prosthesis. Several reports in the European literature tout the superiority of the through-knee amputation over the above-knee amputation in the patient with vascular disease. Through-knee amputation has received little attention in the United States, however, owing to the belief that the long flaps necessary to close a standard through-knee amputation are associated with an unacceptable rate of wound problems and offer no functional ambulatory advantage to above-knee amputation. We reviewed our experience with a modified technique of through-knee amputation in a group of patients with severe lower extremity ischemia who were not candidates for below-knee amputation to determine the incidence of wound complications and their functional outcome. METHODS: Since 1996, 12 patients with severe lower extremity arterial insufficiency have undergone through-knee amputation utilizing a technique designed to limit flap length and facilitate the fit of a suction prosthesis. Two patients died of myocardial infarction in the immediate postoperative period and were excluded from the study. In the remaining 10 patients (1 man, 9 women; mean age 63 years (range 40 to 86), the below-knee amputation level was precluded because of gangrene or nonhealing wounds of the mid leg in 5 patients, failure of a previous below-knee amputation attempt in 4 patients, and severe ischemia that would compromise below-knee amputation healing in 1 patient. Nine patients had at least one failed vascular reconstruction procedure. RESULTS: Mean follow-up is 25 months (range 6 to 41). Six (60%) patients had primary healing of their amputations. Two (20%) patients had delayed healing (6 weeks and 8 weeks). Two (20%) patients developed wound infections, which required amputation revision to the above-knee level. Seven (70%) patients were fitted with a suction socket prosthesis and are fully ambulatory. One patient healed but has not ambulated because of ischemia and subsequent ulceration of the contralateral limb. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that through-knee amputation is associated with an acceptable primary healing rate (80%) and satisfactory functional outcomes (70% ambulation) in a high-risk vascular population. The functional advantages of through-knee amputation over above-knee amputation make it the preferred alternative for patients with vascular disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Why were limbs amputated? An evaluation of 216 surgical specimens from Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand.

INTRODUCTION: Limb loss has a devastating effect on patients. To know the underlying causes of limb amputation would be helpful in planning public health strategies in the country. The objectives of this study are (1) to identify the primary causes and the feature of limb amputations in the setting of a university hospital, and (2) to study the time trends of the causes of limb amputation over a period of 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and pathological data from 216 amputated limbs submitted to the Pathology Department of Chiang Mai University Hospital from 2000 to 2004 were reviewed. RESULTS: Of these, 188 cases were first time amputations, and 28 cases were repeat amputations. The 188 first amputated specimens included 23 upper limbs (12%) and 165 lower limbs (88%), from 115 male (61%) and 73 female (39%) patients. Dysvascular (46%), tumor-related (36%), and infection-related (10%) amputations were the three most common scenarios. The rate of amputation was high in 2004 (32%) owing to an unexpected increase in the numbers of dysvascular amputation. Atherosclerosis accounted for at least 52% of dysvascular amputations. The leading cause of tumor-related amputations was sarcoma (72%), almost half of which were osteosarcomas. The major cause of lower limb amputation was dysvascular (51%) whereas that of upper limb amputation was tumor related (61%). Subgroup analysis of the major limb amputations revealed that 44% were tumor related, 39% were dysvascular, and 8% were infection-related causes. The proportion of major limb losses in the tumor-related group (87%, 59/68) was significantly higher than those in the dysvascular group (62%, 53/86) (P = 0.001). In addition, the proportion of upper limb losses in the tumor-related group (21%, 14/68) was significantly greater than those in the dysvascular group (2%, 2/86), (P < 0.001). The causes of 28 repeat amputations were similar, i.e., dysvascular (61%), tumor related (29%), and infectious related (7%). CONCLUSION: (1) Atherosclerosis, a potentially preventable disease is responsible for the great proportion of limb losses in Northern Thailand; (2) the numbers of dysvascular amputation seem to be increasing; (3) tumor, especially sarcoma, is the most common cause of major limb amputations as well as upper limb loss.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Functional outcomes following trauma-related lower-extremity amputation.

BACKGROUND: The principal aims of this study were to examine functional outcomes following trauma-related lower-extremity amputation and to compare outcomes according to the amputation levels. We hypothesized that above-the-knee amputations would result in less favorable outcomes than would through-the-knee or below-the-knee amputations. A secondary aim was to examine the factors, in addition to amputation level, that influence outcome, including the type of soft-tissue coverage, selected patient characteristics, and the technological sophistication of the prosthetic device. METHODS: A cohort of 161 patients who had undergone an above-the-ankle amputation at a trauma center within three months following the injury was followed prospectively at three, six, twelve, and twenty-four months after the injury. The Sickness Impact Profile, a self-reported measure of functional status, was used as the principal measure of outcome. Secondary outcomes included pain; degree of independence in transfers, walking, and climbing stairs; self-selected walking speed; and the physician's satisfaction with the clinical, functional, and cosmetic recovery of the limb. Longitudinal multivariate regression techniques were used to determine whether outcomes differed according to the level of amputation after we controlled for covariates. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the scores on the Sickness Impact Profile between the patients treated with above-the-knee and those treated with below-the-knee amputation. However, patients with a below-the-knee amputation performed better than did patients with an above-the-knee amputation on the timed test for walking speed (p = 0.04). Patients with a through-the-knee amputation had worse regression-adjusted Sickness Impact Profile scores (p = 0.05) and slower self-selected walking speeds (p = 0.004) than did patients with either a below-the-knee or an above-the-knee amputation. Differences according to the level of amputation were most pronounced for physical function. In general, physicians were less satisfied with the clinical, cosmetic, and functional recovery of the patients with a through-the-knee amputation. Except for problems encountered with insufficient gastrocnemius coverage of the stump in many patients with a through-the-knee amputation, neither the soft-tissue coverage nor the technological sophistication of the prosthesis correlated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Severe disability accompanies above-the-ankle lower-extremity amputation following trauma, regardless of the level of amputation. Clinicians should critically evaluate the need for a through-the-knee amputation in patients with a traumatic injury. The results of this study also underscore the need for controlled studies that examine the relationship between the type and fit of prosthetic devices and functional outcomes.

Amputation, Surgical↗
PubMed2002

Rehabilitation process and functional results of patients with amputated fingers.

Digit amputation is a physical and psychological trauma that can influence the daily living of a person. The rehabilitation of patients with digit amputation is a complex process and should take into consideration all influencing factors, such as the functional, emotional, social, and professional profile of the patient. This study was conducted to evaluate the functional level of patients with amputated fingers and to understand the factors that influence their rehabilitation. Fifty patients (42 male and 8 female with an age ranging from 7 to 84 years) who had digit amputation(s) between January of 1990 and December of 1998 at the level of the metacarpus or distal to it and who had at least 6 months of follow-up were examined. The patients were divided into three different study groups: patients with distal amputation were compared with patients who had proximal amputation, patients with one finger amputation were compared with patients who had multiple finger amputations, and patients who suffered finger amputations caused by work-related accidents were compared with those who suffered amputations caused by other incidents. In addition, the time lapse from the amputation was checked as an influencing factor for different functional levels. The results showed that patients with distal amputation reached a higher motor and sensory functional level than patients with proximal amputation. Patients with one-finger amputation reached higher motor, sensory, and activities of daily living functional levels than patients with multiple amputations, and the level of motor and sensory function of patients with finger amputations caused by work-related accidents was lower than that of patients who suffered amputations in other incidents. Time was proven to be an important factor in the process of motor and emotional recovery.

Accidents, Occupational↗
PubMed2005

Characteristics of pediatric traumatic amputations treated in hospital emergency departments: United States, 1990-2002.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of children with traumatic amputations and the products associated with these injuries. METHODS: Data regarding amputation injuries to children younger than 18 years treated in US emergency departments from 1990 to 2002 were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. Data included demographics, product involved, and body region injured. RESULTS: An estimated 111,600 children younger than 18 years with amputation injuries were treated in US emergency departments from 1990 to 2002. The average age was 6.18 years (median: 4 years; mode: 1 year old). Males experienced 65.5% of these injuries. Finger amputations accounted for 91.6% of all amputations, ranging from 95.2% among 0- to 2-year-olds to 87.9% among 13- to 17-year-olds. Complete amputations accounted for 70.2% of all amputations among 13- to 17-year-olds compared with 52.6% of amputations among 0- to 2-year-olds. Adolescents also had the highest proportion of amputations resulting in hospital admission (26.6% for 13- to 17-year-olds compared with 11.9% for 0- to 2-year-olds). Adolescents had the highest proportion of amputation injuries involving lawn mowers (14.1% for 13- to 17-year-olds compared with 1.4% for 0- to 2-year-olds) and the highest proportion of amputations involving tools (29.3% for 13- to 17-year-olds compared with 2.5% for 0- to 2-year-olds). The percentage of amputations involving doors peaked in the youngest age group and decreased as age increased (65.8% of all amputations for 0- to 2-year-olds compared with 14.1% for 13- to 17-year-olds). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a nationally representative sample to broadly investigate amputation injuries among children. The majority of traumatic amputation injuries occur to young children, to males, and to fingers and the majority involve doors. Adolescents experience a higher proportion of more serious amputation injuries. Effective interventions exist but are inadequately used to prevent many of these injuries, including door stops and modifications, bicycle-chain and spoke guards, wearing closed-toe footwear while bicycling, a no-mow-in-reverse default feature on ride-on lawnmowers with the override switch located behind the mower operator, and a SawStop system on power saws. Use of these technical countermeasures and changes in relevant product standards to promote their implementation and use could lead to a decrease in pediatric traumatic amputations.

Accident Prevention↗