Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “LEPTOSPIRA”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,243 records · Page 69Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Unusual causes of reactive arthritis: Leptospira and Coxiella burnetii.

Reactive arthritis is a well-defined clinical syndrome occurring after various infections, although most cases are usually associated with Chlamydiae and gastrointestinal pathogens. Its immunologic background has been extensively studied, as has its relationship with HLA-B27. We describe two cases of reactive arthritis arising after infections with two pathogens not so far related to the occurrence of reactive arthritis: one patient exhibited migratory oligoarthritis shortly after the course of acute Q fever, and another patient developed monoarthritis during recovery from leptospirosis. Arthritis was transient and did not exhibit a chronic course in either patient. We further discuss the context of pathophysiology of the arthritis in these patients, with an emphasis on the immunomodulatory properties of these two pathogens.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Recognition of Leptospira interrogans antigens by vaccinated or infected dogs.

Antigenic recognition of leptospiral antigens by vaccinated or infected dogs was studied by microagglutination test (MAT) and by western blots. In western blots, serovar specific antigens detected by MAT migrated in the 18-31 kDa zone. The 25-31 zone seemed to be linked to antigens indicating virulence of the strain. These antigens are LPS. The first antibodies made after infection are produced against LPS migrating in the 14 kDa zone. Many protein antigens are common in leptospires belonging to different serogroups. Virulent strains exhibited specific antigens in the 45 and 32-34 kDa zones.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Evaluation of a recombinant LipL41 antigen of Leptospira interrogans serovar canicola in ELISA for serodiagnosis of bovine leptospirosis.

The efficacy of a recombinant leptospiral lipoprotein LipL41 as an antigen for conducting enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for diagnosis of bovine leptospirosis was evaluated. Using known positive and known negative cattle sera the recombinant antigen was found to be highly reactive in the concentration of 100 ng/well. Using a total of 321 field cattle sera the sensitivity of ELISA as compared to microscopic agglutination test (MAT) was calculated to be 100% whereas the specificity was 85.3%. The seropositivity of leptospirosis among bovine population was found to be 21.18% having the predominance of serovars Sejroe and Pomona. It was concluded that rLipL41 protein could be a putative diagnostic candidate for serodiagnosis of bovine leptospirosis.

Agglutination Tests↗
PubMed2006

Leptospira DNA detection for the diagnosis of human leptospirosis.

This study aims to analyse PCR applicability to the diagnosis of human leptospirosis and to compare the sensitivity of two primer pairs in urine and blood samples. PCR with G1/G2 and LP1/LP2 primers was specific and able to detect 10pg of DNA by agarose gel and 1pg by hybridization. Twenty-one serovars, representing 20 serogroups of pathogenic leptospires, were amplified with G1/G2 primers. DNA from two non-pathogenic serovars, Andamana and Patoc, was not amplified. For hybridization, one probe employing DNA from most prevalent leptospires (serovars Icterohaemorrhagiae, Copenhageni, and Autumnalis) was chosen in accordance with the microagglutination titres in patient samples. It was observed that not all serovars hybridized with the PCR products of G1/G2 and LP1/LP2 primer amplification, suggesting heterogeneity in the sequence amplified by these primers. G1/G2-primed amplifications of blood and/or urine samples were shown to be significantly more sensitive (57.6%) than the LP1/LP2 primers (33.3%), P=0.04, when positivity of patients is considered. When each primer pair and only urine samples were considered, PCR positivity was higher for G1/G2 primers than for LP1/LP2 (P=0.007). G1/G2 presented greater sensitivity in urine than in blood, and LP1/LP2 presented greater sensitivity in blood than in urine, although these differences were not statistically significant. The positivity of PCR per patient using both primers in blood and/or urine samples was 63.6%, with 84.4% efficiency. PCR was useful for patients without microagglutination detectable antibodies, for whom it was able to diagnose nine out of 11 patients (81.8%).

Adult↗