Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,243 records · Page 69Linked to original sources

Increased cannabinoid receptor density in the posterior cingulate cortex in schizophrenia.

The posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, through both animal and human studies. We have recently shown abnormal glutamate, GABA, and muscarinic receptor binding in the PCC in schizophrenia. In addition, there is evidence for an abnormal endogenous cannabinoid system in schizophrenia. The endogenous cannabinoid system, including CB1 receptors, is proposed to play a role in modulating neurotransmission via affecting the release of a variety of neurotransmitters, (e.g. GABA). In the present study, we used quantitative autoradiography to investigate the binding of [(3)H]CP-55940 to CB1 receptors in the PCC in schizophrenia subjects compared to controls. A significant 25% increase in CB1 binding was found in the superficial layers (layer I, II) of the PCC of schizophrenia subjects compared to controls, none of whom had recently used cannabis. There was no statistical difference in CB1 binding in the deeper layers (layers III-VI) between the two groups. There were no significant correlations between CB1 binding density and age, PMI, pH, brain weight, freezer storage time, or final recorded antipsychotic drug dose. These results show an increase in CB1 receptor density in the PCC in schizophrenia, and therefore provide support for a role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in schizophrenia.

Adult↗

Pharmacologic interaction between cannabinoid and either clonidine or neostigmine in the rat formalin test.

BACKGROUND: Although spinal cannabinoid receptor agonist (WIN 55,212-2) has been shown to encounter various models of pain, the role of two subtypes of cannabinoid receptor for the antinociceptive effect of cannabinoids has not been investigated at the spinal level. Spinal alpha 2 receptor agonist (clonidine) and cholinesterase inhibitor (neostigmine) are also active in the modulation of nociception. The authors examined the properties of drug interaction after coadministration of WIN 55,212-2-clonidine, and intrathecal WIN 55,212-2-neostigmine, and further clarified the role of cannabinoid 1 and 2 receptors in cannabinoid-induced antinociception at the spinal level. METHODS: Catheters were inserted into the intrathecal space of male Sprague-Dawley rats, and 50 microl of 5% formalin solution was injected into the hind paw to evoke the pain. Isobolographic analysis was used for evaluation of pharmacologic interaction. RESULTS: Intrathecal 55,212-2, clonidine, and neostigmine dose-dependently suppressed the flinching observed during phase 1 and 2 in the formalin test. Isobolographic analysis revealed a synergistic interaction after intrathecal delivery of WIN 55,212-2-clonidine or WIN 55,212-2-neostigmine mixture in both phases. The antinociceptive effect of WIN 55,212-2 was antagonized by cannabinoid 1 receptor antagonist (AM 251) but not by cannabinoid 2 receptor antagonist (AM 630). No antinociceptive effect was seen after intrathecal administration of cannabinoid 2 receptor agonist (JWH 133). CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal 55,212-2, clonidine, and neostigmine attenuate the facilitated state and acute pain. WIN 55,212-2 interacts synergistically with either clonidine or neostigmine. The antinociception of WIN 55,212-2 is mediated through the cannabinoid 1 receptor, but not the cannabinoid 2 receptor, at the spinal level.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists as promising new medications for drug dependence.

This review examines the development of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonists as a new class of therapeutic agents for drug addiction. Abused drugs [alcohol, opiates, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), and psychostimulants, including nicotine] elicit a variety of chronically relapsing disorders by interacting with endogenous neural pathways in the brain. In particular, they share the common property of activating mesolimbic dopamine brain reward systems, and virtually all abused drugs elevate dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens. Cannabinoid CB(1) receptors are expressed in this brain reward circuit and modulate the dopamine-releasing effects of Delta(9)-THC and nicotine. Rimonabant (SR141716), a CB(1) receptor antagonist, blocks both the dopamine-releasing and discriminative and rewarding effects of Delta(9)-THC in animals. Blockade of CB(1) receptor activity by genetic invalidation also decreases rewarding effects of opiates and alcohol in animals. Although CB(1) receptor blockade is generally ineffective in reducing the self-administration of cocaine in rodents and primates, it reduces the reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior produced by cocaine-associated conditioned stimuli and cocaine-priming injections. Likewise, CB(1) receptor blockade is effective in reducing nicotine-seeking behavior induced by re-exposure to nicotine-associated stimuli. Some of these findings have been recently validated in humans. In clinical trials, Rimonabant blocks the subjective effects of Delta(9)-THC in humans and prevents relapse to smoking in exsmokers. Findings from both clinical and preclinical studies suggest that ligands blocking CB(1) receptors offer a novel approach for patients suffering from drug dependence that may be efficacious across different classes of abused drugs.

Animals↗

Postnatal development of presynaptic receptors that modulate noradrenaline release in mice.

The objective of the study was to clarify the postnatal development of the following transmitter release-modulating receptors of noradrenergic neurons in mice: alpha2-adrenoceptors, muscarinic, opioid and cannabinoid receptors (inhibitory), beta-adrenoceptors and receptors for angiotensin II and bradykinin (facilitatory). Wildtype (NMRI) and in some cases alpha2A/D-adrenoceptor-deficient mice aged 1 day (P1) or 8-16 weeks (adults) were used. Hippocampal and occipito-parietal cortex slices and sympathetically innervated tissues (atria and vas deferens) were preincubated with [3H]-noradrenaline and then superfused and stimulated electrically. Stimulation led to distinct increases in tritium efflux which were abolished by tetrodotoxin or removal of calcium. Concentration-response curves of appropriate agonists and in the case of alpha2-autoreceptors antagonists were determined. For beta-adrenoceptors and angiotensin receptors, the interaction of agonists with antagonists was also examined. Results demonstrate that alpha2A/D-autoreceptors operate already at P1 whereas nonalpha2A/D-autoreceptors, presumably alpha2C, develop later. Of the various heteroreceptors, those of brain noradrenergic neurons (OP3 and ORL1) modulate the release of [3H]-noradrenaline at least as effectively at P1 as in adults. Those of peripheral sympathetic neurons (muscarinic, probably mainly M2, OP1, OP2, OP3, CB1, AT1 and B1), in contrast, operate less effectively or not at all at P1, with one exception: beta2-adrenoceptors increase the release of [3H]-noradrenaline (atria) to the same extent, irrespective of age. Overall, results indicate that brain and peripheral noradrenergic neurons release their transmitter already shortly after birth. Presynaptic receptor mechanisms mature differentially in the brain and the periphery. Moreover, the various presynaptic receptors differ in their postnatal development and may play differential roles at different ages.

Animals↗

Signaling pathways involved in the development of cannabinoid tolerance.

Considerable plasticity exists in the endogenous cannabinoid system, as evidenced by the high degree of tolerance that develops following repetitive exposure to exogenously administered cannabinoid receptor agonists. This tolerance development is accompanied by cannabinoid CB(1) receptor downregulation and attenuation of G-protein activation. The biological processes responsible for CB(1) receptor downregulation remain to be fully understood. However, recent evidence suggests that several protein kinases participate in the development of cannabinoid tolerance. These observations implicate a role for protein kinases in cannabinoid signaling pathways. It remains to be established whether these protein kinases are directly involved in CB(1) receptor regulation or whether they contribute to tolerance by modulating additional signaling pathways.

Animals↗

Galanin modulates neuronal and synaptic properties in the rat supraoptic nucleus in a use and state dependent manner.

The magnocellular neurons of the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus (SON) synthesize and secrete oxytocin (OXT) and vasopressin (AVP) from their dendrites. These peptides, and several other neurotransmitters, have been shown to modulate afferent glutamatergic neurotransmission in the SON. The neuropeptide, galanin (GAL) is also localized in SON magnocellular neurons and in afferent fibers in the nucleus. We show that GAL dose-dependently reduces evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (eEPSCs), alters paired pulse ratio and decreases mEPSC frequency, but not amplitude or decay kinetics in both OXT and AVP neurons. GAL therefore modulates excitatory neurotransmission at a likely presynaptic receptor. Neither OXT/AVP, GABA(B) nor cannabinoid antagonists blocked this effect. A GAL2/3 agonist mimicked GAL's action while GAL1 antagonist did not block GAL's effect, suggesting that GAL2/3 receptors mediate the presynaptic effect. In nondehydrated rats GAL causes a small postsynaptic response, as assessed by input resistance measurements. When the rats were water deprived for 2 days the presynaptic response to GAL was unaltered; however, the postsynaptic decrease in input resistance and hyperpolarization was increased, an effect consistent with a previously described increase in GAL1 receptor expression in dehydration. A GAL1 receptor antagonist blocked the postsynaptic effects. Last, when a train of eEPSCs was elicited, GAL was found to inhibit the earlier events in a train but not the latter. This indicates that GAL may modulate a single synaptic event more effectively than trains of synaptic inputs, thereby acting as a high-pass filter.

Animals↗

Novel G protein-coupled receptors as pain targets.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their ligands play a number of important roles in the modulation of acute and chronic pain. Indeed, opioid and cannabinoid ligands are of established therapeutic value for pain management, and further exploitation of the specific GPCR subtypes (delta-opioid, CB1 and CB2) for these ligands may yield more selective, potent analgesics with favorable side effects. More recent identification of a number of other GPCRs involved in pain pathways (eg, sensory neuron specific receptors) and selective ligands that modulate pain transmission, has highlighted further therapeutic opportunities. A further challenge to understanding pain modulation and an additional dimension for targeting analgesia is the discovery of GPCR heteromerization and accessory and regulatory proteins, such as regulator of G protein-signaling proteins, involved in expression and regulation of GPCR.

Analgesics↗

AP-1 activity is negatively regulated by cannabinol through inhibition of its protein components, c-fos and c-jun.

Regulation of the activator protein-1 (AP-1) complex is very intricate because it involves phosphorylation state, protein-protein, and protein-DNA interactions. In these studies, the regulation of AP-1 activity, with emphasis on c-fos and c-jun regulation, was investigated using cannabinol (CBN) in primary mouse splenocytes in vitro. Cannabinoid compounds exhibit immunosuppressive actions that are putatively mediated through Gi-protein coupled receptors that negatively regulate adenylate cyclase. However, recent studies suggest that cannabinoids modulate other signaling cascades. Indeed, we demonstrate that CBN inhibited binding to AP-1-containing sites from the interleukin-2 promoter. This inhibition of binding was, in part, due to decreased nuclear expression of c-fos and c-jun. We further determined that the effects of CBN were due to posttranslational modifications of these phosphoproteins and showed that CBN inhibited the activation of ERK MAP kinases. Thus, cannabinoid-induced immunosuppression involves disruption of the ERK signaling cascade.

Animals↗

Modification of 5-HT2 receptor mediated behaviour in the rat by oleamide and the role of cannabinoid receptors.

Oleamide (cis-9,10-octadecenoamide) is an endogenous brain lipid which has been suggested to induce sleep in experimental animals. The mechanism of action is unclear but shares many of the characteristics of endogenous cannabinoids such as anandamide and has been shown to enhance in vitro responses to 5-HT and GABA. In the present study we investigated the effects of oleamide on two motor behaviours, back muscle contractions (BMC) and wet-dog shakes (WDS) induced in rats by treatment with the 5-HT2 receptor agonist DOI ((+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride). We then examined the potential involvement of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the responses to oleamide and the mechanism of interaction between CB1 and 5-HT2 receptors. Oleamide and the cannabinoid receptor agonist HU210 (6aR)-trans-3-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)6a,7,10,10a-tetrahydro-1-h ydroxy-6,6-dimethyl-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-9-methanol) produced a hypolocomotion which was prevented by the CB1 antagonist SR141716A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-me thyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride). Despite having no effect alone, oleamide and HU210 potentiated BMC induced by treatment with DOI. SR141716A alone did not affect the response to DOI but it blocked the potentiations caused by oleamide or HU210. WDS were unaffected by oleamide and slightly reduced by HU210. In vitro, oleamide and HU210 enhanced the high affinity binding of 5-HT to 5-HT2 receptors on rat cerebral cortex membranes labelled with 3H-ketanserin. Neither agent, however, altered 5-HT-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in rat cerebral cortex slices. Oleamide occupied CB1 cannabinoid receptors on rat brain membranes labelled with 3H-CP55940 with an IC50 of 10 microM. The data presented are consistent with oleamide acting via a cannabinoid recognition site to enhance 5-HT2 receptor function in vivo. The mechanism of the modulation is still unclear but it does not appear to involve a potentiation of 5-HT2 receptor-stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis.

Amphetamines↗

Selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation inhibits spinal nociceptive transmission in vivo.

Cannabinoid1 (CB1) receptors are located at CNS sites, including the spinal cord, involved in somatosensory processing. Analgesia is one of the tetrad of behaviors associated with cannabinoid agonists. Here, effects of a potent cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide (ACEA) on evoked responses of dorsal horn neurons in anesthetized rats were investigated. Extracellular recordings of convergent dorsal horn neurons were made in halothane anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 16). Effects of spinal application of ACEA on electrically evoked responses of dorsal horn neurons were studied. Mean maximal effects of 0.5, 5, 50, and 500 ng/50 microl ACEA on the C-fiber-mediated postdischarge response were 79 +/- 6, 62 +/- 10, and 54 +/- 7% (P < 0.01), 45 +/- 6% (P < 0.01), of control, respectively. ACEA (500 ng/50 microl) also reduced the C-fiber-evoked nonpotentiated responses of neurons (59 +/- 9% of control, P < 0.05) and Adelta-fiber-evoked responses of neurons (68 +/- 10% of control, P < 0.01). Minor effects of ACEA on Abeta-fiber-evoked responses were observed. Spinal pre-administration of the selective CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (0.01 microg/50 microl) significantly reduced effects of ACEA (500 ng/50 microl) on postdischarge responses of dorsal horn neurons. This study demonstrates that spinal CB1 receptors modulate the transmission of C- and Adelta-fiber-evoked responses in anesthetized rats; this may reflect pre- and/or postsynaptic effects of cannabinoids on nociceptive transmission. CB1 receptors inhibit synaptic release of glutamate in rat dorsolateral striatum, a similar mechanism of action may underlie the effects of ACEA on noxious evoked responses of spinal neurons reported here.

Action Potentials↗

Functional localization of cannabinoid receptors and endogenous cannabinoid production in distinct neuron populations of the hippocampus.

The possible localization of cannabinoid (CB) receptors to glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic terminals impinging upon GABAergic interneurons in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus was examined using the electrophysiological measurement of neurotransmitter release in brain slices. Whereas activation of cannabinoid receptors via the application of the cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 significantly and dose-dependently reduced evoked IPSCs recorded from interneurons possessing somata located in the stratum radiatum (S.R.) and stratum oriens (S.O.) lamellae, evoked glutamatergic EPSCs were unaffected in both neuronal populations. However, in agreement with previous reports, WIN55,212-2 significantly reduced EPSCs recorded from CA1 pyramidal neurons. Additional experiments confirmed that the effects of WIN55,212-2 on IPSCs were presynaptic and that they could be blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A. The involvement of endogenous cannabinoids in the presynaptic inhibition of GABA release was also examined in the interneurons and pyramidal cells using a depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) paradigm. DSI was observed in CA1 pyramidal neurons under control conditions, and its incidence was greatly increased by the cholinergic agonist carbachol. However, DSI was not observed in the S.R. or S.O. interneuron populations, in either the presence or absence of carbachol. Whereas DSI was not present in these interneurons, the inhibitory inputs to these cells were modulated by the synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212-2. These data support the hypothesis that cannabinoid receptors are located on inhibitory, but not excitatory, axon terminals impinging upon hippocampal interneurons, and that CA1 pyramidal neurons, and not interneurons, are capable of generating endogenous cannabinoids during prolonged states of depolarization.

Animals↗

Arachidonylethanolamide (AEA) activation of FOS proto-oncogene protein immunoreactivity in the rat brain.

It is thought that the physiological actions of endogenous cannabinoid arachidonylethanolamide (AEA), as well as exogenous cannabinoids such as Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), are mediated by two subtypes of cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2, which have recently been characterized. Injection of AEA leads to alterations in motor behavior and endocrine function. While these phenomena have been well characterized, the neuronal substrate of AEA's actions remains undetermined. In this study, FOS immunoreactivity (FOSir) was used to map rat brain nuclei that are responsive to a single intracerebroventricular injection of AEA. The results showed that FOSir was induced in several nuclei including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN), central nucleus of the amygdala (Ce), periaqueductal gray area (PAG), dentate gyrus in the hippocampus (Dg), paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVA), median preoptic nucleus (MnPO), periventricular nucleus (Pe), caudate putamen (CPU) and the ependymal lining of the ventricles. The pattern of activation identified correlates, in part, with the distribution of CB receptors. At the same time, a new subset of nuclei, without demonstrable CB receptors, have been shown to respond to an AEA challenge. Activation of these nuclei is consistent with the physiological effects of AEA. These findings provide valuable information on the response to AEA at the level of neuronal activation and provide the basis for a broader understanding of the possible role of CB receptors in the modulation of motor and endocrine function associated with the use of exogenous cannabinoids, such as marijuana.

Animals↗

Local pressure application of cannabinoid agonists increases spontaneous activity of rat substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons without affecting response to iontophoretically-applied GABA.

This study tested the hypothesis that cannabinoid agonists, applied locally into the pars reticulata of substantia nigra (SNpr), could modulate striatonigral transmission, without affecting the response of SNpr neurons to iontophoretically-applied GABA. Multibarreled glass capillary electrode assemblies were used for extracellular recording of the spontaneous electrical activity of single SNpr cells in anesthetized rats. Local pressure ejection of the cannabinoid agonists Win 55212-2 (WIN2) and CP 55940 increased SNpr spontaneous firing rate by 13-46%, similar to the effects of systemic injections. Neither WIN2 nor CP 55940 had an effect on the slowing of SNpr neuron activity in response to iontophoretic GABA. Local pressure application of Win 55212-3 (the much less active enantiomer of WIN2) produced an insignificant decrease in SNpr firing rate. Similarly, locally applied vehicle (45% 2-hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin) produced insignificant decreases in SNpr firing. A second application of cannabinoid agonist produced a much smaller effect, suggesting desensitization. Increasing the interval between CP 55940 applications to 45 min showed recovery of sensitivity to the agonist. Local application of the cannabinoid antagonist, SR 141716A, significantly decreased spontaneous cell firing by 34%. CP 55940, when given immediately following or concurrently with the antagonist application failed to produce the expected increase in discharge rate over baseline. A second application of CP 55940 45 min later produced a 26% increase in firing rate. Bicuculline methiodide (BMI) was applied locally causing a significant increase in SNpr cell firing. CP 55940, when locally administered concurrently with bicuculline methiodide, had no further effect on the firing rate of the cell. Based on the reported presynaptic localization of cannabinoid receptors in SNpr, these findings suggest that cannabinoids act within the SNpr to modulate striatonigral neurotransmission presynaptically. The effect of SR 141716A suggests that an endogenous cannabinoid may mediate striato-nigral transmission.

Action Potentials↗

Interactions between delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and kappa opioids in mice.

The selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) has been shown to modulate cannabinoid-induced antinociception by delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC). However, it is not known whether nor-BNI blocks other pharmacological effects of delta 9-THC or if this is a specific action of nor-BNI. Studies were conducted in which pretreatment with nor-BNI (2, 10 and 20 micrograms i.t.) selectively blocked delta 9-THC-induced antinociception while not significantly affecting other commonly observed cannabinoid actions, which included hypothermia, hypoactivity and catalepsy. Chronic administration studies were performed to determine if cross tolerance could be established between delta 9-THC and the highly specific kappa opioid receptor agonists, U-50,488H and CI-977. The chronic delta 9-THC-treated groups were significantly tolerant, not only to i.t. delta 9-THC-induced antinociception in the tail-flick test, but also to i.t. U-50,488 and CI-977 compared with those treated chronically with vehicle. They were not cross tolerant to either DAMGO or DPDPE. Dose-response curves were generated for both delta 9-THC (i.t.) and CI-977 (i.t.) in mice tolerant to delta 9-THC and CI-977. Parallel shifts to the right of the delta 9-THC dose-response curves were observed in animals tolerant to delta 9-THC and also in animals tolerant to CI-977. Animals tolerant to CI-977 also demonstrated parallel shifts of the dose-response curves of both delta 9-THC and CI-977. This study demonstrated that cannabinoid actions can be distinguished from each other. The pharmacological separation of antinociception from the other cannabinoid-induced actions implies that it may have a mechanism distinct from other effects. In addition, this study indicates that delta 9-THC and the kappa opioid agonists may share a common mechanism of action in the production of antinociception and that a possible interaction exists between i.t. administered cannabinoid compounds and the kappa opioid receptor.

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cycloh↗

Mechanisms of cannabinoid inhibition of GABA(A) synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.

The localization of cannabinoid (CB) receptors to GABAergic interneurons in the hippocampus indicates that CBs may modulate GABAergic function and thereby mediate some of the disruptive effects of marijuana on spatial memory and sensory processing. To investigate the possible mechanisms through which CB receptors may modulate GABAergic neurotransmission in the hippocampus, whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed on CA1 pyramidal neurons in rat brain slices. Stimulus-evoked GABA(A) receptor-mediated IPSCs were reduced in a concentration-dependent manner by the CB receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (EC(50) of 138 nM). This effect was blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A (1 microM) but not by the opioid antagonist naloxone. In contrast, evoked GABA(B)-mediated IPSCs were insensitive to the CB agonist. WIN 55,212-2 also reduced the frequency of spontaneous, action potential-dependent IPSCs (sIPSCs), without altering action potential-independent miniature IPSCs (mIPSCs), measured while sodium channels were blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX). Blockade of voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs) by cadmium also eliminated the effect of WIN 55,212-2 on sIPSCs. Depolarization of inhibitory terminals with elevated extracellular potassium caused a large increase in the frequency of mIPSCs that was inhibited by both cadmium and WIN 55,212-2. The presynaptic effect of WIN 55,212-2 was also investigated using the potassium channel blockers barium and 4-aminopyridine. Neither of these agents significantly altered the effect of WIN 55,212-2 on evoked IPSCs. Together, these data suggest that presynaptic CB1 receptors reduce GABA(A)- but not GABA(B)-mediated synaptic inhibition of CA1 pyramidal neurons by inhibiting VDCCs located on inhibitory nerve terminals.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid receptor-mediated regulation of intracellular calcium by delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol in resting T cells.

Cannabinoids exhibit broad immune modulating activity by targeting many cell types within the immune system, including T cells, which exhibit sensitivity, as evidenced by altered activation, proliferation, and cytokine expression. As a result of the critical role calcium plays in T cell function coupled with previous findings demonstrating disruption of the calcium-regulated transcription factor, nuclear factor of activated T cells, by cannabinoid treatment, the objective of the present investigation was to perform an initial characterization of the role of the cannabinoid receptors in the regulation of the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) by delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta(9)-THC) in T lymphocytes. Here, we demonstrate that delta(9)-THC robustly elevates [Ca(2+)](i) in purified murine splenic T cells and in the human peripheral blood acute lymphoid leukemia (HPB-ALL) human T cell line but only minimally elevates [Ca(2+)](i) in Jurkat E6-1 (dysfunctional cannabinoid receptor 2-expressing) human T cells. Removal of extracellular calcium severely attenuated the delta(9)-THC-mediated rise in [Ca(2+)](i) in murine splenic T cells and HPB-ALL cells. Pretreatment with cannabinoid receptor antagonists, SR144528 and/or SR141716A, led to an attenuation of delta(9)-THC-mediated elevation in [Ca(2+)](i) in splenic T cells and HPB-ALL cells but not in Jurkat E6-1 cells. Furthermore, pretreatment of HPB-ALL cells with SR144528 antagonized the small rise in [Ca(2+)](i) elicited by delta(9)-THC in the absence of extracellular calcium. These findings suggest that delta(9)-THC induces an influx of extracellular calcium in resting T cells in a cannabinoid receptor-dependent manner.

Animals↗

Activation of peripheral cannabinoid CB1 receptors inhibits mechanically evoked responses of spinal neurons in noninflamed rats and rats with hindpaw inflammation.

The presence of cannabinoid1 (CB1) receptors on primary afferent fibres may provide a novel target for cannabinoid analgesics. The present study investigated the ability of peripheral CB1 receptors to modulate innocuous and noxious transmission in noninflamed rats and rats with peripheral carrageenan inflammation. Effects of peripheral injection of arachidonyl-2-choroethylamide (ACEA; 10 and 30 micro g in 50 micro L), a selective CB1 receptor agonist, on mechanically evoked responses of dorsal horn neurons were studied in noninflamed rats and rats with peripheral carrageenan inflammation. Peripheral injection of ACEA (30 micro g in 50 micro L) significantly inhibited innocuous (12 g) mechanically evoked responses of spinal neurons in noninflamed (27 +/- 4% of control; P < 0.01) and inflamed (12 +/- 8% of control; P < 0.05) rats. Similarly, noxious (80 g) mechanically evoked responses of spinal neurons were inhibited by peripheral injection of ACEA (30 micro g in 50 micro L) in noninflamed rats (51 +/- 9% of control; P < 0.01) and rats with peripheral carrageenan inflammation (21 +/- 8% of control; P < 0.01). Inhibitory effects of ACEA were significantly greater in rats with peripheral carrageenan inflammation than in noninflamed rats (P < 0.05). Inhibitory effects of ACEA were significantly blocked by coadministration of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A in both groups of rats. Peripheral injection of SR141716A alone did not alter mechanically evoked responses of spinal neurons in either group of rats. These data demonstrate that activation of peripheral CB1 receptors can inhibit innocuous and noxious somatosensory processing. Furthermore, following peripheral inflammation there is an enhanced inhibitory effect of a peripherally administered CB1 receptor agonist on both innocuous and noxious mechanically evoked responses of spinal neurons.

Animals↗

Antagonism of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the paraventricular nucleus of male rats induces penile erection.

The effect of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists and antagonists on penile erection was studied in male rats when injected into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxyamide] (0.5-5 microg) induced penile erection in a dose-dependent manner. The minimal effective dose was 1 microg, while the maximal response was found with 5 microg of the compound. In contrast, the CB1 receptor agonists WIN 55,212-2 [4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenyl-carbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo[3,2,1-I,j]quinolin-6-one] (0.5-5 microg) and CP 55,940 [1alpha,2beta-(R)-5alpha]-5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxy-propyl)cyclohexyl]phenol (0.5-5 microg) were ineffective at all the doses tested. Nevertheless, both compounds reduced the enhancing effect of SR 141716A on penile erection when given into the paraventricular nucleus at the above doses before SR 141716A. The pro-erectile effect of SR 141716A was also reduced by the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizolcipine (MK-801) (0.2 microg) and by the NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-l-arginine methylester (L-NAME) (20 microg) but not by the dopamine receptor antagonist cis-flupenthixol (10 microg) or the oxytocin receptor antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)2-Orn8-vasotocin (0.1 microg), when given into the paraventricular nucleus. In spite of its inability to prevent the pro-erectile effect of SR 141716A when given in the paraventricular nucleus, d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)2-Orn8-vasotocin) (1 microg) reduced almost completely SR 141716A-induced penile erection when given into the lateral ventricles. The present results show that cannabinoid CB1 receptors present in the paraventricular nucleus may influence erectile function and sexual activity by modulating paraventricular oxytocinergic neurons mediating erectile function.

Animals↗