Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,225 records · Page 68Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Interactions between recreational drugs and antiretroviral agents.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize existing data regarding potential interactions between recreational drugs and drugs commonly used in the management of HIV-positive patients. DATA SOURCES: Information was obtained via a MEDLINE search (1966-August 2002) using the MeSH headings human immunodeficiency virus, drug interactions, cytochrome P450, medication names commonly prescribed for the management of HIV and related opportunistic infections, and names of commonly used recreational drugs. Abstracts of national and international conferences, review articles, textbooks, and references of all articles were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Literature on pharmacokinetic interactions was considered for inclusion. Pertinent information was selected and summarized for discussion. In the absence of specific data, prediction of potential clinically significant interactions was based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. RESULTS: All protease inhibitors (PIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are substrates and potent inhibitors or inducers of the cytochrome P450 system. Many classes of recreational drugs, including benzodiazepines, amphetamines, and opioids, are also metabolized by the liver and can potentially interact with antiretrovirals. Controlled interaction studies are often not available, but clinically significant interactions have been observed in a number of case reports. Overdoses secondary to interactions between the "rave" drugs methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) or gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and PIs have been reported. PIs, particularly ritonavir, may also inhibit metabolism of amphetamines, ketamine, lysergic acid diethylmide (LSD), and phencyclidine (PCP). Case series and pharmacokinetic studies suggest that nevirapine and efavirenz induce methadone metabolism, which may lead to symptoms of opiate withdrawal. A similar interaction may exist between methadone and the PIs ritonavir and nelfinavir, although the data are less consistent. Opiate metabolism can be inhibited or induced by concomitant PIs, and patients should be monitored for signs of toxicity and/or loss of analgesia. PIs should not be coadministered with midazolam and triazolam, since prolonged sedation may occur. CONCLUSIONS: Interactions between agents commonly prescribed for patients with HIV and recreational drugs can occur, and may be associated with serious clinical consequences. Clinicians should encourage open dialog with their patients on this topic, to avoid compromising antiretroviral efficacy and increasing the risk of drug toxicity.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2003

Intracellular disposition and metabolic effects of zidovudine, stavudine and four protease inhibitors in cultured adipocytes.

OBJECTIVE: The pathogenesis of lipodystrophy caused by the HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is unclear. We have investigated the disposition of these drugs in adipocytes and the consequent effect on adipocyte metabolism and viability. DESIGN: Laboratory study utilizing two murine cell lines, 3T3-L1 and 3T3-F442A. METHODS: Intracellular NRTI phosphate and PI concentrations were determined by HPLC and HPLC-MS/MS, respectively. The cytotoxicity of the drugs was examined on the different adipogenic stages together with their effects on glucose uptake plus or minus insulin, and on glycerol and triglyceride levels. RESULTS: There was rapid intracellular accumulation and phosphorylation of [3H]-zidovudine and -stavudine to their phosphate metabolites in adipocytes. The NRTIs were not cytotoxic, did not affect preadipocyte protein synthesis and did not inhibit adipogenesis or induce lipolysis. PIs accumulated in adipocytes (nelfinavir>saquinavir>ritonavir>indinavir). All PIs, except indinavir, were cytotoxic and inhibited adipogenesis, increased lipolysis and impaired preadipocyte protein synthesis. PIs inhibited glucose uptake in the rank order: indinavir>saquinavir>ritonavir>nelfinavir. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that PIs may play a role in the insulin resistance observed in lipodystrophy by affecting glucose uptake, adipogenesis and lipolysis. NRTIs alone do not seem to have any effect on adipocyte metabolism despite undergoing phosphorylation to their triphosphorylated anabolites, although their effects in combination with PIs in perturbing adipocyte metabolism warrants further investigation.

Adipocytes↗
PubMed2003

Development of phenotypic and genotypic resistance to antiretroviral therapy in the UNAIDS HIV Drug Access Initiative--Uganda.

OBJECTIVE: We describe phenotypic drug resistance, response to therapy, and genotypic mutations among HIV-infected patients in Uganda taking antiretroviral medications for > or = 90 days who had a viral load > or = 1000 copies/ml. METHODS: HIV-1 group and subtype, virologic and immunologic responses to antiretroviral therapy, phenotypic resistance to antiretroviral drugs, and associated genotypic mutations among patients at three treatment centers in Uganda between June 1999 and August 2000 were assessed. Therapy was two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) or highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). RESULTS: All HIV identified was HIV-1, group M, subtypes A, C, and D. Sixty-one (65%) of 94 patients with a phenotypic resistance result had evidence of phenotypic resistance including resistance to a NRTI for 51 of 92 (55%) taking NRTIs, to a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) for nine of 16 (56%) taking NNRTIs, and to a protease inhibitor (PI) for eight of 37 (22%) taking PIs. At the time of the first specimen with resistance, the median change from baseline viral load was -0.56 log copies/ml [interquartile range (IQR), -1.47 to +0.29] and CD4+ cell count was +35 x 10(6) cells/l (IQR, -18 to +87). Genotypic resistance mutations, matched with phenotypic resistance assay results and drug history, were generally consistent with those seen for HIV-1, group M, subtype B infections in industrialized countries. CONCLUSION: Initial phenotypic resistance and corresponding genotypic mutations among patients treated in Uganda were similar to those with subtype B infections in North America and Europe. These data support policies that promote the use of HAART regimens against HIV-1, group M, non-B subtypes in a manner consistent with that used for subtype B infections.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗
PubMed2001

Trifluoromethyl-containing 3-alkoxymethyl- and 3-aryloxymethyl-2-pyridinones are potent inhibitors of HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase.

3-Alkoxymethyl- and 3-aryloxymethyl-2-pyridinones were synthesized and evaluated for activity as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) of HIV-1. It was found that several compounds were potent inhibitors of HIV-1 with the most potent compound 24 exhibiting an IC90 = 32 nM. Compound 24 also possessed a potent resistance profile as demonstrated by submicromolar IC90s against several clinically meaningful mutant virus strains.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2003

Protein binding in antiretroviral therapies.

There is marked variability in the extent to which the three classes of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs bind to plasma proteins (<5 to >99%). Protease inhibitors (PIs), with the exception of indinavir, are more than 90% protein bound, mainly to alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG). Efavirenz, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is more than 99% bound, mainly to albumin. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are not highly protein bound. The pharmacological activity of ARV drugs is dependent on unbound drug entering cells that harbor the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). There has been concern that changes in protein binding could impact on antiviral activity and management. However, for PIs and NNRTIs, and for many drugs given orally, altered plasma binding would not be expected to influence the average exposure to unbound (active) drug after chronic oral dosing. Nevertheless, there will be a change in the relationship between total and unbound concentrations that will be important if, as part of therapeutic drug monitoring, the total rather than the unbound drug is measured. Measuring drug concentrations that are needed to inhibit different HIV strains (wild type and drug resistant) in vitro could also cause confusion because most methods employ bovine serum in the assay medium, and unbound concentrations are not directly measured. Estimating unbound drug concentrations in human plasma and in incubation media can be highly method dependent and thus may affect the calculated IC50 (the concentration of drug that results in 50% inhibition of viral replication). Because inhibitory quotients (IQs = C(trough)/IC50) are becoming part of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses of clinical trial data, the strengths and weaknesses of the methods used for the determination of unbound drug concentration in plasma and in vitro systems--ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, and equilibrium dialysis--need to be understood. Consensus on standard procedures must be reached. In June 2002, a panel of experts assembled by the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research met in Washington, DC, to review the basic principles of protein binding of ARV drugs, and to discuss the impact that changes in plasma protein binding may have on the PKs and activity of ARV drugs as well as on therapeutic drug monitoring. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the following topics: (1) basic principles of protein binding and how changes in binding can impact on drug PKs and drug exposure in vivo, (2) variability in plasma protein binding among patients taking ARV drugs, (3) the impact of HIV infection and concomitant diseases on the extent of plasma protein binding, (4) the likelihood of clinically relevant drug interactions at the level of plasma protein binding, (5) the evidence that measuring unbound concentrations of ARV drugs in the plasma of patients gives more meaningful information than total drug concentration and, therefore, should be considered in routine therapeutic drug monitoring of ARV agents, (6) optimal method(s) for measuring the unbound concentration of drugs in vitro (for IC50 determination) and in vivo, and (7) future studies that need to be considered to fully understand the importance of plasma protein binding in therapeutic drug monitoring. This report summarizes the topics discussed at this meeting. It guides the reader through the discussions that allowed the panel to formulate a series of statements regarding the significance of plasma protein binding of ARV drugs when studied in vitro and in vivo. The roundtable participants also identified research priorities that are important for understanding the sources of inter- and intraindividual variability in protein binding in patients. These include obtaining data on unbound as well as on total concentrations in PK studies; looking at variants of AAG and whether they differ in binding affinity; and emphasizing the importance of developing a standard procedure for drug susceptibility assays used to determine IC50 values.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Anti-HIV-1 activity of calanolides used in combination with other mechanistically diverse inhibitors of HIV-1 replication.

The natural product (+)-calanolide A, a unique non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) of HIV-1 replication, is currently being evaluated in clinical trials in the USA. (+)-Calanolide A, the congeners costatolide and dihydrocostatolide, and (+)-12-oxo(+)-calanolide A, were evaluated in combination with a variety of mechanically diverse inhibitors of HIV replication to define the efficacy and cellular toxicity of potential clinical drug combinations. These assays should be useful in prioritizing the use of different combination drug strategies in a clinical setting. The calanolides exhibited synergistic antiviral interactions with other nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. Additive interactions were also observed when the calanolides were used with representative compounds from each of these classes of inhibitors. No evidence of either combination toxicity or antagonistic antiviral activity was detected with any of the tested compounds. The combination antiviral efficacy of three-drug combinations involving the calanolides, and the efficacy of two- and three-drug combinations using a (+)-calanolide A-resistant challenge virus (bearing the T139I amino acid change in the reverse transcriptase), was also evaluated in vitro. These assays suggest that the best combination of agents based on in vitro anti-HIV assay results would include the calanolides in combination with lamivudine and nelfinavir, since this was the only three-drug combination exhibiting a significant level of synergy. Combination assays with the (+)-calanolide A-resistant strain yielded identical results as seen with the wild-type virus, although the concentration of the calanolides had to be increased.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2000

HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection with regimens that include protease inhibitors (PIs) has contributed to marked improvements in HIV-related disease progression and mortality. Five PIs are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and have potent activity in vitro. PIs with 2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors have demonstrated prolonged suppression of HIV-1 replication in treated patients and improvements in disease progression and mortality. PIs combined with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or other PIs produce marked antiretroviral effects. Although not all patients have prolonged responses to PIs, and salvage treatment has had mixed results for patients who have not responded to initial PI therapy or whose HIV RNA levels have relapsed during such therapy, newer PIs currently being developed hold promise. Most patients can successfully tolerate PI-including regimens; however, long-term side effects, such as body fat redistribution, insulin resistance, and increased serum lipids, are now being observed in some patients receiving PI-including therapy.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2004

Emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Gilead Sciences is developing a fixed-dose co-formulation of two of its reverse transcriptase inhibitors, emtricitabine [Emtriva] and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [Viread], for once-daily dosing in combination with other antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV infection. Each co-formulated tablet will contain 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and 200 mg of emtricitabine. Emtricitabine [Emtriva] is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) with demonstrated potent activity against HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV). It was first approved in the US by the FDA in July 2003 and is indicated for adults aged > or =18 years. Safety and effectiveness in paediatric patients have not been established. In antiretroviral-treatment-experienced patients, the use of emtricitabine may be considered for adults with HIV strains that are expected to be susceptible to the drug as assessed by genotypic or phenotypic testing. The recommended dose of emtricitabine is one 200 mg capsule daily, with or without food. In the European Union, emtricitabine is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV in adults and children, where it is also licensed as an oral 10 mg/mL solution. The oral solution is for use in infants older than 4 months, children and patients unable to swallow hard capsules, and patients with renal impairment who require dose reduction. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [Viread] is a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in treatment-experienced patients. The drug was first approved in the US in October 2001, followed by further approvals in the European Union, Australia, Iceland, Brazil, Canada and Switzerland. The drug has been launched in all these countries. In February 2003, the EMEA's advisory committee adopted a positive opinion to extend the indication of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all 15 member states to include the product's use in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients. In July 2003, Japan Tobacco signed an agreement with Gilead for the commercialisation of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine and the future co-formulation of these two drugs within Japan. Under the terms of the agreement, Japan Tobacco will be submitting an application to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for regulatory approval of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine. On 15 March 2004, Gilead announced the submission of a New Drug Application (NDA) to the US FDA and a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) to the EMEA for marketing approval of the fixed-dose co-formulation of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. The MAA will be reviewed under the centralised procedure, which, when finalised, will provide one marketing authorisation in all 25 member states of the enlarged European Union. Gilead anticipates launching the combination pill on the US market early in 2005. Regulatory filings for marketing approval in Japan by Japan Tobacco are also expected during 2004. In August 2003, Gilead announced that enrollment had begun in a 48-week phase III study (Study 934) evaluating the efficacy of a once-daily regimen of Viread and Emtriva versus Combivir. The open-label, multicentre trial will enroll up to 500 treatment-naive, HIV-infected patients in the US and Europe. Patients in one arm will receive Viread 300 mg, Emtriva 200mg and efavirenz 600 mg once daily. Patients in the comparator arm will receive Combivir) (lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg) twice daily and efavirenz 600 mg once daily.

Adenine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Resolution of disseminated molluscum contagiosum with Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART) in patients with AIDS.

Molluscum contagiosum (MC), a cutaneous infection caused by a DNA virus belonging to the poxvirus group, affects about 5-10% of patients with HIV disease, often showing extensive, severe lesions, unresponsive to therapy [1]. During the follow-up of three patients with AIDS for MC recalcitrant to therapy, we noted their cutaneous lesions cleared 5-6 months after they had begun Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART). This therapy includes an HIV protease inhibitor (indinavir) and two reverse transcriptase inhibitors [2, 3].

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2005

No significant influence of saquinavir hard-gel capsule administration on pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in combination with ritonavir: a population approach.

The influence of saquinavir hard-gel capsules on lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters was investigated using a population approach. Forty-nine patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus saquinavir (group A), and 118 patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (group B) were included in the study. No significant relationship was established between the presence or the daily dosage of saquinavir in the treatment and lopinavir population pharmacokinetic parameters. The values (mean+/-standard deviation) of the individual apparent clearance (5.0+/-1.8 vs. 5.0+/-3.2 L/h), volume of distribution (66.6+/-1.6 vs. 66.8+/-1.9 L), absorption rate constant (0.37+/-0.01 vs. 0.37+/-0.03 hours), and trough plasma concentration (5.5+/-2.3 vs. 5.3+/-1.9 mg/L) of lopinavir are not significantly different between groups A and B. This lack of influence of saquinavir on lopinavir pharmacokinetics makes the use of this combination in salvage therapy easier.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

2004: which HIV-1 drug resistance mutations are common in clinical practice?

The emergence of drug resistance remains a major problem for the treatment of HIV-infected patients. However, the variety of mutational patterns that evolve in clinical practice have made the application of resistance data to clinical decision-making challenging. Despite (or because of) an abundance of drug-resistance data from disparate sources, there is only limited information available describing the patterns of drug resistance which usually appear in the clinic. Here we attempt to address this issue by reviewing HIV drug resistance in the population of patients failing antiretroviral therapy in British Columbia, Canada from June 1996 to December 2003 as an example. Our findings suggest that, although hundreds of mutations have been associated with resistance, relatively few key mutations occur at a high frequency. For example, only the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations M184V, M41L T215Y, D67N, K70R and L210W, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations K103N and Y181C, and protease inhibitor (PI) mutation L90M, occur in more than 10% of samples tested for resistance in this population. The introduction of new drugs allows for the selection of new mutations. Trends in the prevalence of resistance-associated mutations have generally followed trends in drug usage, but have not always mirrored them. The phenomenon of cross-resistance can play an important role in the efficacy of new antiretroviral agents, even before they become available. The extent of this cross-resistance depends in part on the prevalence of specific mutations in the population of individuals who have previously received antiretroviral therapy. Hence there is a need to determine which mutations are prevalent in the treated population. The tremendous capacity of HIV to adapt means that common resistance pathways are likely to change over time, and new pathways to resistance are likely to continue to be discovered in the future.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2003

Drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and comedicated agents.

HIV-infected individuals usually receive a wide variety of drugs in addition to their antiretroviral drug regimen. Since both non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors are extensively metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system, there is a considerable potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions when they are administered concomitantly with other drugs metabolised via the same pathway. In addition, protease inhibitors are substrates as well as inhibitors of the drug transporter P-glycoprotein, which also can result in pharmacokinetic drug interactions. The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are predominantly excreted by the renal system and may also give rise to interactions. This review will discuss the pharmacokinetics of the different classes of antiretroviral drugs and the mechanisms by which drug interactions can occur. Furthermore, a literature overview of drug interactions is given, including the following items when available: coadministered agent and dosage, type of study that is performed to study the drug interaction, the subjects involved and, if specified, the type of subjects (healthy volunteers, HIV-infected individuals, sex), antiretroviral drug(s) and dosage, interaction mechanism, the effect and if possible the magnitude of interaction, comments, advice on what to do when the interaction occurs or how to avoid it, and references. This discussion of the different mechanisms of drug interactions, and the accompanying overview of data, will assist in providing optimal care to HIV-infected patients.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2004

Impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy on the spectrum of liver disease in HCV-HIV coinfection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The mortality associated with HIV has decreased dramatically with the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). However, the impact of HAART, including protease inhibitors (PIs), nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and non-NRTIs (NNRTIs), on the spectrum of HCV-related liver disease remains unclear. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the impact of PI and NNRTI use on liver histological characteristics in patients with stable HIV-HCV coinfection (n = 101) compared with HIV-uninfected controls with HCV infection (n = 302). METHODS: The majority of coinfected patients were men (75%), African American (82%), and had genotype 1 HCV (91%). Mean HIV load was 1.52 log copies/mL, 48% had undetectable HIV RNA and a mean CD4 count of 528 cells/microL, and 11% had a CD4 count < 200 cells/microL. Both mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (83 U/L; 54% had a normal ALT level) and Knodell Histological Activity Index score (7.04; 33% had advanced fibrosis) were similar to those of our control population. Ninety-three percent of patients were administered a mean of 3 antiretroviral medications: NRTIs in 98%, NNRTIs in 45%, and PIs in 54%. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in biochemical or histological parameters between patients administered or not administered PIs or NNRTIs. CONCLUSIONS: In this uncontrolled retrospective analysis, we were unable to show a significant impact of either PI or NNRTI use on the spectrum of liver disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

L-735,524: an orally bioavailable human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor.

To date, numerous inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease have been reported, but few have been studied extensively in humans, primarily as a consequence of poor oral bioavailability in animal models. L-735,524 represents a class of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors, termed hydroxyaminopentane amides, that incorporate a basic amine into the hydroxyethylene inhibitor backbone. L-735,524 is a potent inhibitor of virus replication in cell culture and inhibits the protease-mediated cleavage of the viral precursor polyproteins that results in the production of noninfectious progeny viral particles. The compound is effective against viruses resistant to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and is synergistically active when used in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Most importantly, L-735,524 exhibits good oral bioavailability and plasma pharmacokinetic profiles in two species of laboratory animals by using clinically acceptable formulations. Accordingly, the compound was selected for evaluation of safety and pharmacokinetic studies in humans.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2007

Anti-adenoviral effect of anti-HIV agents in vitro in serotypes inducing keratoconjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Around one million people are affected by adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis a year in Japan, and it is recognized as one of the major pathogens of ophthalmological nosocomial infection worldwide. Although cidofovir can be used systemically for immunocompromised patients with disseminated adenoviral infection, no specific anti-adenoviral agent has been established for the treatment of adenoviral infection. We evaluated the anti-adenoviral effect of anti-HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) agents in this study. METHODS: Five anti-HIV agents (zalcitabine, stavudine, nevirapine, indinavir and amprenavir) were subjected to in vitro evaluation. A549 cells were used for viral cell culture, and adenovirus serotypes 3, 4, 8, 19 and 37 were used. After calculating CC(50) (50% cytotoxic concentration) of each agent by MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) method, we cultured adenovirus with the agents for seven days and quantitatively measured extracted adenoviral DNA by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Among the anti-HIV drugs, zalcitabine and stavudine, both nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, showed significant anti-adenoviral activity. In contrast, nevirapine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and indinavir and amprenavir, which are both protease inhibitors, were ineffective against adenovirus. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that zalcitabine and stavudine are possible candidates for the local and systemic treatment of adenoviral infection, and the anti-adenoviral effect might depend on the pharmacological properties of anti-HIV agents. The chemical properties on the clinical safety for systemic and local application need to be determined in order to for these drugs to be accepted for the treatment of adenovirus in clinical settings.

Adenovirus Infections, Human↗
PubMed2004

Automated, fast, and sensitive quantification of drugs in human plasma by LC/LC-MS: quantification of 6 protease inhibitors and 3 nonnucleoside transcriptase inhibitors.

An analytic assay based on automated sample preparation and liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was developed for the quantification of 6 protease inhibitors (PIs) and 3 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). The 6 PIs, amprenavir, indinavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, and saquinavir, as well as the three NNRTIs, nevirapine, efavirenz, and delavirdine, require a succinct analysis technique for therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV/AIDS patients. After protein precipitation, samples were loaded on a C8, 10 x 4-mm extraction column, washed, and, after activation of the column-switching valve, backflushed onto the 30 x 2.1 mm C8 analytic column. [M+H] ions were detected in the selected ion mode. A nonlinear fit (y(-1) = a + b/x, all r2 > 0.999) for amprenavir, indinavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, and saquinavir and a linear fit (y = ax + b, all r2 > 0.999) for nevirapine, efavirenz, and delavirdine led to best regression. Absolute recoveries were as follows: PIs > 81%; NNRTIs > 76%. Interday and intraday precision were <12.5% for the PIs and <11.7% for the NNRTIs. Interday and intraday accuracy were <12.2% for the PIs and <14.9% for the NNRTIs. Limits of quantification were 20, 40, 50, 40, 40, 20, and 100 microg/L for amprenavir, indinavir, ritonavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir, and the NNRTIs, respectively. The assay allows fast analysis of patient samples for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and has successfully been used for TDM and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions studies.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2002

Development and significance of resistance to protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected adults under triple-drug therapy in clinical practice.

Development of drug resistance is considered a major cause for failure of antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients adherent to treatment. However, the rate of emergence and the significance of HIV-1 drug resistance in clinical practice have been not investigated thoroughly. Selection of HIV-1 variants that are genotypically resistant to protease inhibitors was studied in all the patients (n = 169) who completed at least 18 months of treatment with a protease inhibitor plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors at two urban Italian hospitals. HIV-1 carrying primary protease inhibitor resistance mutations was detected in 70 (41.4%) patients. The estimated proportion of patients developing genotypic resistance to protease inhibitors at 12 and 24 months was 18.3% (95% CI, 12.5-24.2%) and 33.9% (95% CI, 26.4-41.5%), respectively. Independent predictors of development of resistance to protease inhibitors were higher HIV-1 RNA levels at the nadir (P < 0.0001) and inclusion of ritonavir or saquinavir versus indinavir in the starting regimen (P = 0.0313). Resistance to protease inhibitors was strongly associated with a lower response to treatment, as shown by HIV-1 RNA load (P = 0.0001) and CD4 cell counts (P = 0.005). However, a linear increase in CD4 cell counts was maintained up to the end of follow-up even in the protease inhibitor-resistant population. Resistance to protease inhibitors develops in a relevant proportion of patients under long-term triple-drug therapy in clinical practice and is associated with virological treatment failure and limitation of CD4 cell increase.

Anti-HIV Agents↗