Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Questionnaires”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,225 records · Page 68Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: To provide further evidence of reliability and internal and external construct validity of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), which measures severity of postconcussion symptoms following head injury. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study of consecutive patients presenting with a head injury in two urban teaching hospitals and a community trust. PATIENTS: Three hundred and sixty-nine patients returned a questionnaire from 1689 consecutive adult patients (18 years and above) referred to radiology for a skull X-ray following a head injury, and those who were currently under the care of a community-based multidisciplinary head injury team. METHOD: Internal construct validity tested by fit to the Rasch Measurement model; external construct validity tested by correlations with Rivermead Head Injury Follow-up Questionnaire (RHFUQ); test-retest reliability tested by correlations at two-week intervals. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire and Rivermead Head Injury Follow-up Questionnaire. MAIN RESULTS: RPQ scores ranged from 0 to 64 (17.3% floor, 0.3% ceiling). Overall fit to the Rasch model was poor (item fit mean -0.416, SD = 1.989, chi-squared= 172.486, p<0.01) suggesting a lack of unidimensionality. The items headaches, dizziness and forgetful displayed misfitting residuals and the first two items also displayed significant item trait fit statistics (p < 0.0006). After removing the items headaches, dizziness and subsequently nausea the RPQ demonstrated good fit at overall and individual item levels, both for the remaining 13 items (RPQ-13) and the three items (RPQ-3) which now formed a subsidiary scale. All items functioned consistently across age and gender. The RPQ-13 and RPQ-3 scales showed test-retest reliability coefficients of 0.89 and 0.72 (both p-values < 0.01) and positive correlations with RHFUQ scores (0.83 for RPQ-13, 0.62 for RPQ-3, both p-values < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As currently used, the RPQ does not meet modern psychometric standards. Its 16 items do not tap into the same underlying construct and should not be summated in a single score. When the RPQ is split into two separate scales, the RPQ-13 and the RPQ-3, each set of items forms a unidimensional construct for people with head injury at three months post injury. These scales show good test-retest reliability and adequate external construct validity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Feasibility of using postal questionnaires to examine carer satisfaction with palliative care: a methodological assessment. South Tyneside MAAG Palliative Care Study Group.

This paper reports on the methodological findings from a project which examined the feasibility of using a postal questionnaire to assess lay carer satisfaction with palliative care. The focus of this paper is the process of questionnaire development and its psychometric evaluation. The questionnaire was derived from an interview schedule used in previous national surveys of care for the dying, and was refined through qualitative work with recently bereaved lay carers. It was then tested in a postal survey of 355 lay carers identified from death registration certificates. Overall response rates were low, but significantly enhanced by the use of a single reminder sent 3 weeks after the initial mailshot. The analysis indicated that in the majority of cases the person targeted to receive the questionnaire was the most appropriate informant. Psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire against five criteria was encouraging, with low item nonresponse and ineligible response, and some evidence of discriminatory power, reliability, and face and content validity. Postal approaches appear to represent an acceptable means of assessing user satisfaction with palliative care, compared with more resource-intensive methods.

Caregivers↗
PubMed1994

Prospective evaluation of prognostic variables from patient-completed questionnaires. North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

PURPOSE: This study was developed to determine whether descriptive information from a patient-completed questionnaire could provide prognostic information that was independent from that already obtained by the patient's physician. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An initial detailed questionnaire was administered to approximately 150 patients with advanced cancer. This questionnaire was subsequently revised and given to a total of 1,115 patients with advanced colorectal or lung cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the data from these questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 36 variables showed statistically significant prognostic information for survival in univariate analyses, even though many of these variables were associated with only a minimal increase in risk. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was a high correlation between many variables. Three major groups of variables became apparent as providing strong prognostic information. These included the following: (1) a physician's assessment of performance status (PS); (2) a patient's assessment of their own PS; and (3) a nutritional factor such as appetite, caloric intake, or overall food intake. CONCLUSION: Data generated by a patient-completed questionnaire can provide important prognostic information independent from that obtained by other physician-determined prognostic factors.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1999

Comparability of nutrient estimation by three food frequency questionnaires for use in epidemiological studies.

Replication of results is an important issue in studies of diet and disease, possibly dependent on data collection method. We compared assessments from the Health Habits and History Questionnaire (HHHQ), the Harvard Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (HFFQ), and the New York State Cohort Food Frequency Questionnaire (CFFQ) for estimates of daily intakes of energy, protein, carbohydrates, total fat, dietary fiber, cholesterol, vitamins A, C, and E, and carotenoids. Fifty-nine men and 50 women aged 35-73 years completed the HHHQ and HFFQ as interviews and the 44-food CFFQ as a self-administered mailed questionnaire. Comparability was assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients. Quantitation of nutrient intake differed by nutrient, questionnaire, and nutrient calculation method. Ranking on energy and macronutrient intake for the HHHQ and HFFQ ranged from 0.62 to 0.80; ranking for micronutrient intake ranged from 0.56 to 0.80. For the CFFQ with the HHHQ or HFFQ, correlations ranged between 0.29 and 0.62. The CFFQ performs comparably to the HHHQ and HFFQ for some, but not all, nutrients; our results suggest that the HHHQ and HFFQ can be used interchangeably with reasonable confidence in studies of diet and disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Quality of life (QOL) in patients with acromegaly is severely impaired: use of a novel measure of QOL: acromegaly quality of life questionnaire.

Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) is a new disease-generated quality of life (QOL) questionnaire comprising 22 questions covering physical and psychological aspects of acromegaly and subdivided into "appearance" and "personal relations" categories. We have performed a cross-sectional study of QOL in 80 patients [43 male (mean age, 54.2 yr; range, 20-84); median GH, 0.93ng/ml (range, <0.3 to 23.7); IGF-I, 333.1 ng/ml (range, 47.7-899)] with acromegaly. In addition to AcroQoL, patients completed three generic QOL questionnaires: Psychological General Well-Being Schedule (PGWBS), EuroQol, and a signs and symptoms score (SSS). All three generic questionnaires confirmed impairment in QOL [mean scores: PGWBS, 69.6; EuroQol, visual analog scale, 66.4 (range, 20-100) and utility index, 0.7 (range, -0.07 to 0.92); and SSS, 12 (range, 0-27)]. There was no correlation between biochemical control and any measure of QOL. AcroQoL (57.3%; range, 18.2-93.2) correlated with PGWBS (r = 0.73; P < 0.0001); and in patients with active disease, AcroQoL-physical dimension correlated with SSS (r = -0.67; P < 0.0003). In all questionnaires, prior radiotherapy was associated with impaired QOL. In conclusion, these data underline the marked impact that acromegaly has on patients' QOL and provide the first evidence validating AcroQoL against well-authenticated measures of QOL. This indicates the potential of AcroQoL as a patient-friendly measure of disease activity.

Acromegaly↗
PubMed2005

Can allodynic migraine patients be identified interictally using a questionnaire?

OBJECTIVE: The gradual development of cutaneous allodynia during the course of a migraine attack is commonly detected by quantitative sensory testing (QST) in migraineurs seeking secondary and tertiary medical help. In this study, the authors developed a questionnaire that tested the recollection of the patients on their skin sensitivity during past migraine attacks. METHODS: The authors devised a series of questions regarding skin sensitivity during migraine and posed them to 89 migraineurs when they were free of migraine (Visit 1). To validate their recollections, the authors determined the patients' pain thresholds to mechanical and thermal skin stimuli in the absence of migraine (Visit 1) and during an attack (Visit 2), using QST. RESULTS: Whereas 75.3% of the patients testified to at least one type of skin hypersensitivity during migraine, 24.7% were unaware of any abnormal skin sensitivity. The questionnaire correctly identified 84.8% of the 66 patients classified as allodynic by QST and mislabeled the remaining 15.2% as nonallodynic (false negatives). Among the 23 patients classified as nonallodynic by QST, 47.8% were mislabeled as allodynic using the questionnaire (false positives). Among the total number of 89 patients studied, the questionnaire produced 62.9% true positives and 13.5% true negatives (= 76.4% correct labeling) vs 12.4% false positives and 11.2% false negatives (= 23.6% mislabeling). CONCLUSION: The reliability of the questionnaire as a diagnostic tool of allodynia varies with the proportion of allodynic patients in a given clinic. The major source of variability is the misconception of nonallodynic patients that their skin is hypersensitive during migraine.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability.

The MIDAS Questionnaire was developed to assess headache-related disability with the aim of improving migraine care. Headache sufferers answer five questions, scoring the number of days, in the past 3 months, of activity limitations due to migraine. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity (accuracy) of the questionnaire were assessed in separate population-based studies of migraine sufferers. In addition, the face validity, ease of use, and clinical utility of the questionnaire were evaluated in a group of 49 physicians who independently rated disease severity and need for care in a diverse sample of migraine case histories. The test-retest Pearson correlation coefficient for the total MIDAS score was approximately 0.8. The MIDAS score was valid when compared with a reference diary-based measure of disability; the overall correlation between MIDAS and the diary-based measure was 0.63. The MIDAS score was also correlated with physicians' assessments of need for medical care (r = 0.69). From studies completed to date, the MIDAS Questionnaire has been shown to be internally consistent, highly reliable, valid, and correlates with physicians' clinical judgment. These features support its suitability for use in clinical practice. Use of the MIDAS Questionnaire may improve physician-patient communication about headache-related disability and may favorably influence health-care delivery for migraine patients.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed2006

Reliability and validity of a school-based physical activity questionnaire.

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability and validity of the School Health Action, Planning and Evaluation System (SHAPES) physical activity questionnaire, a machine-readable questionnaire designed to collect data from all students in a school from grades 6 to 12 and to provide feedback to the school for planning and evaluation. METHODS: Study 1 assessed test-retest reliability by administering the questionnaire twice, 1 wk apart to 2812 students in grades 9-12. Study 2 assessed criterion validity using MTI accelerometers worn consecutively for 7 d, and measured height and weight (N = 67, grades 6-12). RESULTS: The overall kappa/weighted kappa coefficient for the 1-wk test-retest reliability of the questionnaire items indicated moderate agreement (mean 0.57 +/- 0.24). Self-reported and accelerometer-measured average daily time spent performing moderate to vigorous physical activity were significantly correlated (Spearman r = 0.44, P < 0.01); however, students tended to overreport physical activity. Height and weight were not consistently over- or underreported. Self-reported and measured body mass index were significantly correlated (Spearman r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Classification of weight status by body mass index was similar using self-reported values compared with measured values. CONCLUSION: The findings of these studies suggest that the SHAPES physical activity questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity and is suitable for use in large-scale school-based data collections for child and adolescent populations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

'I suppose that depends on how I was feeling at the time': perspectives on questionnaires measuring quality of life and musculoskeletal pain.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the thoughts and reasoning of respondents in relation to their experience of back and knee pain while they were completing validated health status questionnaires as part of two epidemiological surveys. METHODS: Qualitative interviews with 10 participants who were sampled from previous questionnaire responders. Content analysis identified emerging themes. Analysis allowed for a comparison with other research, for a focus on disease-specific questionnaire interpretations, and use of additional survey material (i.e. annotations alongside questionnaire items and accompanying letters). RESULTS: Adaptation to limitations and comparisons with previous self and/or others changed the way people responded to the standardized questions. The determination of specific periods of pain proved very difficult for respondents because pain, and low back pain in particular, was rarely experienced as a stable phenomenon. In addition, the time frames used in questionnaires were often at variance with the lived reality of pain and its effects on individuals' perceptions of time. Respondents tended to emphasize the context within which they experienced pain, and in the case of knee pain, often ranked this pain in relation to other health issues. CONCLUSIONS: In epidemiological studies, differences in interpretations are averaged across large samples, but we argue that a deeper understanding of the range of individual interpretations is important if one is to acknowledge the different meanings of pain within populations. The accounts of pain sufferers are highly complex and variable. Multi-method studies offer an opportunity to explore these using complementary approaches. This may lead to both more patient-centred research and health service provision.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Prediction of residential pet and cockroach allergen levels using questionnaire information.

We assessed the accuracy of questionnaire reports of cat and dog ownership and presence of cockroaches in predicting measured allergen concentrations in house dust. We collected dust samples in the homes of 932 newborns living in New England. Dust samples were taken from the main living area and the infant's bedding. Allergen content of house dust was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and related to questionnaire information on past and current cat and dog ownership and presence of cockroaches. Allergen levels were dichotomized using the limit of detection and the following cut points: 1.0 microg/g and 8.0 microg/g for cat, 2.0 microg/g and 10.0 microg/g for dog, and 2 U/g and 8 U/g for cockroach allergen. For the upper cut point, both specificity and sensitivity of questionnaire-reported cat and dog ownership and presence of cockroaches were high. For the limit of detection and lower cut point, specificity was high (> 80%), whereas sensitivity was low, particularly for current cat and dog ownership (21-60%). Taking pet ownership during the preceding 2 years into account increased the sensitivity by 10%, but it remained relatively poor. In conclusion, questionnaire-reported pet ownership and presence of cockroaches predicts allergen levels above the upper cut point but is a relatively poor measure of allergen exposure above the limit of detection and the lower cut point. Knowledge of past pet ownership can improve pet allergen exposure assessment by means of questionnaire. However, for epidemiologic purposes, measured concentrations of allergens are necessary.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The effects of continuing medical education credits on physician response rates to a mailed questionnaire.

This study investigated whether the opportunity to obtain Continuing Medical Education (CME) credit together with a five-dollar bill increased response rates and questionnaire completion rates in a physician survey involving mailed questionnaires. One thousand, three hundred and fourteen cardiologists, family practitioners, general internists (non-surgeons) and 264 vascular surgeons randomly identified from the American Medical Association database participated. After two, of up to four, questionnaire mailings, the opportunity to obtain CME credit and a five-dollar bill were included with questionnaire mailings. Among non-surgeons, 26.5% responded to pre-incentive mailings and 30.2% of those initially unresponsive replied after the interventions. Among surgeons, 39% responded to pre-incentive mailings and 32.7% of those initially unresponsive replied after the interventions. In conclusion, the opportunity to receive CME credit combined with a small monetary incentive is an effective motivation for physicians participating in a study involving mailed questionnaires.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Measuring interrelating within couples: the Couple's Relating to Each Other Questionnaires (CREOQ).

The Couple's Relating to Each Other Questionnaires (CREOQ) are a set of four questionnaires for measuring negative forms of interrelating within couples. They enable each partner to rate his/her relating to the other and the other's relating to him/her. They are based upon the theoretical structure called the interpersonal octagon, and each questionnaire has eight scales. They are usually accompanied by a brief, single-scale questionnaire called the US (us as a couple), by which each partner rates the quality of the relationship. The set of questionnaires was administered to 130 English couples from the community, 157 English couples seeking couple therapy and 89 Dutch community couples. The Dutch couples were also invited to rate themselves and their partners according to the items of the revised interpersonal checklist (ICL-R). The mean scores for the US and for most of the scales of the four CREOQ were significantly higher in the couple therapy sample. The internal reliabilities of the Dutch sample were generally lower than those of the English sample. Correlations were examined between the 10 ICL-R scales and the 8 CREOQ ones. Some agreement emerged, and for the ICL-R, there appeared to be one close, one distant, four upper and two lower scales.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1997

Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL).

We report the development and validation of an osteoporosis-targeted quality of life questionnaire to measure the impact of the disease in the general population. From multiple focus groups with women with osteoporosis, healthy women at risk for osteoporosis, spouses and relatives of women with osteoporosis, and health care providers, we identified over 300 potential items related to the disease. A lengthy questionnaire incorporated these items and was administered to a second large study cohort of 222 women with clinical osteoporosis (history of fracture, significant height loss, and/or kyphosis); 101 women with known low bone mineral density levels that would categorize them as osteoporotic but who had not yet shown obvious physical manifestations of the disease; and 142 women with other conditions (such as arthritis, cancer, depression) expected to also have an impact on quality of life. Final items from among the original 300 were chosen for their demonstrated relationship with osteoporosis as measured by clinical manifestations and low bone density and with quality of life measured by a standard generic questionnaire, the SF-36. The final questionnaire contains 26 scored items in three domains-physical activity, adaptations, and fears- and six nonscored questions relating to osteoporotic changes and diagnosis. This instrument is unique among osteoporosis-targeted questionnaires in that it attempts to measure the total impact of the disease on quality of life within a population at a single point in time.

Community-Institutional Relations↗
PubMed2003

Age- and sex-differences in the validity of questionnaire-based zygosity in twins.

Questionnaire-based zygosity assessment in twins has generally been found to be valid. In this report we evaluate sex- and age-differences in the validity of such questionnaire-based classification when using the four questions that have been the basis of zygosity assessment in The Danish Twin Registry for half a century. Three hundred and forty-two male and 531 female twin pairs were zygosity diagnosed using genetic markers and the results compared with the original questionnaire based classification. We found significant differences in the accuracy of questionnaire based zygosity diagnosis when stratifying the data for sex as well as age: males and monozygotic having the highest misclassification. However, even in the group with the highest misclassification rate the frequency was less than 8%. The overall misclassification rate was only 4%, with a clear tendency towards a higher proportion of misclassified monozygotic than dizygotic twins. The results demonstrate that questionnaire based zygosity diagnosis can still be regarded as a valid and valuable classification method for most purposes.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Determination of zygosity by questionnaire and physical features comparison in Chinese adult twins.

This study reports on the determination of zygosity in Chinese adult twins by simple questionnaire and physical features comparison. The subjects were 511 twin pairs from two cities and their town areas, consisting of 371 monozygotic (MZ) and 140 same-sex dizygotic (DZ) pairs, identified by ABO blood group and multiplex polymerase chain reaction of several polymorphic short tandem repeat markers. The twins themselves responded to 8 questionnaire items, 4 items on twin similarity, and 4 items on the frequency of mistaking one twin for another by parents, relatives, teachers and strangers when they were 6 to 13 years old. Research assistants responded to 20 items regarding twins' physical features at the moment of interview. A parsimonious model established using stepwise logistic regression analysis of the 28 items showed that the total accuracy of zygosity diagnosis was 90.1%. The accuracy was 89.2% when using only the items dealing with the confusion of twins and 85.4% using only similarity. In the questionnaire, 'facial appearance', 'mistaken by teachers' and 'mistaken by strangers' had stronger discriminating power between MZ and DZ twins. Two physical features--'eyelid' and 'middigital hair'--were informative to some extent. There was no statistically significant sex and area difference in the validity of such questionnaire and physical features comparison-based classification. In conclusion, questionnaire-based zygosity assessment in this Chinese adult twin sample could still be regarded as a valid and valuable classification method. Physical features comparison, however, could only provide limited information for zygosity determination.

ABO Blood-Group System↗
PubMed2006

Brief questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes in asthma: validation and usefulness in a primary care setting.

UNLABELLED: STUDY OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Health-related quality of life (QoL) instruments are generally used for studies of asthma in specialized settings. For primary care use, there is a need for brief and simple questionnaires for structured patient-reported outcomes. We validated the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with standardized activities (AQLQ[S]) as the "gold standard." The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) was validated against the symptoms domain of the AQLQ(S). Patients were characterized by the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). SUBJECTS: One hundred eight patients (68 women) with asthma diagnosed by their physicians from 24 primary care centers completed two visits (2 to 3 months apart). Their mean SF-36 scores were lower than the national norm for all domains. RESULTS: The Mini-AQLQ and ACQ correlated well with the AQLQ(S). Reliability, determined in 57 patients with stable AQLQ(S) scores, was good. Both brief questionnaires detected improvement or deterioration of patients at the group level. Global ratings of disease severity by patients or clinicians correlated poorly with disease-specific QoL scores. CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-AQLQ and ACQ instruments are sufficiently simple and robust to be suitable for research and quality of care monitoring in primary care at the group level. They may, after further validation, even be useful in the management of individual patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis].

UNLABELLED: The patient with anophthalmia may present feelings of inferiority and rejection. Knowing his/her needs and expectations contribute to a better technical intervention. PURPOSE: To elaborate a questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis. METHODS: An exploratory research was used to elaborate the questionnaire, by means of a guided interview followed by writing down what was said by the interviewees, who were adult patients of the Bucco-Maxillo-Facial Prosthesis Center of FOSJC - UNESP. The guided interview was made up of 14 items directly related to the future outline of the profile. Each item of the interview resulted in questions of the questionnaire, which was pretested twice before reaching its final version. RESULTS: The patients reported, in the exploratory research, unpleasant feelings with the loss of the eye; relationship shyness; expectations regarding surgery and prosthesis use; a wish to receive explanations and to hold their opinion about the treatment. The questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis is, therefore, made of 43 questions divided into 5 blocks in order to aid the comprehension of the inquired aspects and to facilitate both the computation of data and discussion, and also to improve the selection of questions according to the objective of the researcher or professional. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the questionnaire was viable, can be used in full or by selecting blocks and provide a panorama of the patient's history related to the problem he/she faces, from the loss of the ocular globe to the confection of the prosthesis.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Portuguese-language cultural adaptation and translation of "The Bowel Disease Questionnaire" used to assess functional bowel disorders].

BACKGROUND: Functional bowel disorders are considered a public health problem, but there are a few prevalence studies in Brazil. In 1999, researchers from the Mayo Clinic developed The Bowel Disease Questionnaire with the purpose to evaluate functional bowel disorders. Although this has been used in different studies and population, it is often necessary to perform a cultural adaptation of a questionnaire developed for use in another culture, in order to improve the quality of the information obtained. OBJECTIVE: To translate and adapt the Bowel Disease Questionnaire to Portuguese for its use in adolescents. METHODS: Assessment of conceptual and item equivalence involved evaluation of the pertinence of the concepts in the Brazilian context; translation was evaluated through semantic equivalence between the original instrument and the Portuguese version; measurement equivalence between the original and the Portuguese version was assessed by the intra-observer reliability and internal consistency. RESULTS: The Bowel Disease Questionnaire's concepts were considered pertinent in the Brazilian context; the semantic equivalence between the original and the Portuguese version were high; reliability ranged from moderate to almost perfect; internal consistency of the scales ranged from 0,66 to 0,74. CONCLUSION: The Portuguese version of the Bowel Disease Questionnaire seems to be semantically and culturally equivalent to the original version and might be useful for measuring functional bowel disorders among Brazilian adolescents.

Adolescent↗