Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,207 records · Page 67Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands repress T-cadherin expression in vascular smooth muscle cells.

T-cadherin, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-modified cadherin subtype, is highly expressed in cardiac and vascular tissues. Neither the functions nor regulation of T-cadherin in these tissues is understood. We have cloned rat T-cadherin cDNA encoding the full length amino acid sequence. The 5(') untranslated nucleotide sequences of rat, mouse, and human T-cadherin contain a conserved GCGTG motif which constitutes the invariant core sequence of dioxin- or xenobiotic-regulatory elements. These elements function as target sites for aryl hydrocarbon receptor/aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator (AhR/ARNT) in genes regulated by this transcription factor. Using cultures of rat aortic smooth muscle cells this study presents data revealing T-cadherin as a putative target gene for negative regulation of expression through AHR signalling. Prototypic AHR agonists benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) or 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) repressed T-cadherin mRNA levels. Repression was antagonized by the cognate AHR antagonist alpha-naphthoflavone (alpha-NF). Repression was insensitive to inhibitors of gene transcription (actinomycin D) or de novo protein synthesis (cycloheximide), suggesting AHR/ARNT functions directly in transcriptional repression of T-cad. Regulation of adhesion proteins through the AHR pathway may represent a novel mechanism of action by atherogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

5' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed2003

Regulation of arginine biosynthesis in the psychropiezophilic bacterium Moritella profunda: in vivo repressibility and in vitro repressor-operator contact probing.

We report the cloning of the arginine repressor gene from the psychropiezophilic Gram-negative bacterium Moritella profunda, the purification of its product (ArgR(Mp)), the identification of the operator in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon, in vivo repressibility studies, and an in vitro analysis of the repressor-operator interaction, including binding to mutant and heterologous arginine operators. The ArgR(Mp) subunit shows about 70% amino acid sequence identity with Escherichia coli ArgR (ArgR(Ec)). Binding of purified hexameric ArgR(Mp) to the control region of the divergent operon proved to be arginine-dependent, sequence-specific, and significantly more sensitive to heat than complex formation with ArgR(Ec). ArgR(Mp) binds E.coli arginine operators very efficiently, but hardly recognizes the operator from Bacillus stearothermophilus or Thermotoga maritima. ArgR(Mp) binds to a single site overlapping the -35 element of argC(P), but not argE(P). Therefore, the arrangement of promoter and operator sites in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon of M.profunda is very different from the organization of control elements in the bipolar argECBH operon of E.coli, where both promoters overlap the common operator and are equally repressible. We demonstrate that M.profunda argC(P) is about 44-fold repressible, whereas argE(P) is fully constitutive. A high-resolution contact map of the ArgR(Mp)-operator interaction was established by enzymatic and chemical footprinting, missing contact and base-specific premodification binding interference studies. The results indicate that the argC operator consists of two ARG box-like sequences (18bp imperfect palindromes) separated by 3bp. ArgR(Mp) binds to one face of the DNA helix and establishes contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove of each ARG box, whereas the minor groove segment facing the repressor at the center of the operator remains largely uncontacted. This pattern is reminiscent of complex formation with the repressors of E.coli and B.stearothermophilus, and suggests that each ARG box is contacted by two ArgR subunits belonging to opposite trimers. Moreover, the premodification interference patterns and mutant studies clearly indicate that the inner, center proximal halves of each ARG box in the M.profunda argC operator are more important for complex formation and repression than the outermost halves. A close inspection of sequence conservation and of single base-pair O(c)-type mutations indicate that the same conclusion can be generalized to E.coli operators.

Aldehyde Oxidoreductases↗
PubMed2003

Design principles for regulator gene expression in a repressible gene circuit.

We consider the design of a type of repressible gene circuit that is common in bacteria. In this type of circuit, a regulator protein acts to coordinately repress the expression of effector genes when a signal molecule with which it interacts is present. The regulator protein can also independently influence the expression of its own gene, such that regulator gene expression is repressible (like effector genes), constitutive, or inducible. Thus, a signal-directed change in the activity of the regulator protein can result in one of three patterns of coupled regulator and effector gene expression: direct coupling, in which regulator and effector gene expression change in the same direction; uncoupling, in which regulator gene expression remains constant while effector gene expression changes; or inverse coupling, in which regulator and effector gene expression change in opposite directions. We have investigated the functional consequences of each form of coupling using a mathematical model to compare alternative circuits on the basis of engineering-inspired criteria for functional effectiveness. The results depend on whether the regulator protein acts as a repressor or activator of transcription at the promoters of effector genes. In the case of repressor control of effector gene expression, direct coupling is optimal among the three forms of coupling, whereas in the case of activator control, inverse coupling is optimal. Results also depend on the sensitivity of effector gene expression to changes in the level of a signal molecule; the optimal form of coupling can be physically realized only for circuits with sufficiently small sensitivity. These theoretical results provide a rationale for autoregulation of regulator genes in repressible gene circuits and lead to testable predictions, which we have compared with data available in the literature and electronic databases.

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial↗
PubMed1997

Histone deacetylase activity is required for full transcriptional repression by mSin3A.

Members of the Mad family of bHLH-Zip proteins heterodimerize with Max to repress transcription in a sequence-specific manner. Transcriptional repression by Mad:Max heterodimers is mediated by ternary complex formation with either of the corepressors mSin3A or mSin3B. We report here that mSin3A is an in vivo component of large, heterogeneous multiprotein complexes and is tightly and specifically associated with at least seven polypeptides. Two of the mSin3A-associated proteins, p50 and p55, are highly related to the histone deacetylase HDAC1. The mSin3A immunocomplexes possess histone deacetylase activity that is sensitive to the specific deacetylase inhibitor trapoxin. mSin3A-targeted repression of a reporter gene is reduced by trapoxin treatment, suggesting that histone deacetylation mediates transcriptional repression through Mad-Max-mSin3A multimeric complexes.

Acetylation↗
PubMed1998

Rb interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription.

Previously, we found that Rb can actively repress transcription of cell cycle genes by binding and inactivating transcription factors at the promoter. Here, we demonstrate that Rb can also repress transcription of endogenous cell cycle genes containing E2F sites through recruitment of histone deacetylase, which deacetylates histones on the promoter, thereby promoting formation of nucleosomes that inhibit transcription. These two mechanisms of repression by Rb are selective-some promoters and transcription factors are blocked by this recruitment of histone deacetylase, whereas others are resistant to histone deacetylase activity and are repressed directly by inhibition of transcription factors.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed1998

HIV Tat represses transcription of the beta 2-microglobulin promoter.

The MHC class I complex, which binds and presents peptide antigen, is composed of a class I heavy chain and the beta2-microglobulin light chain. HIV-1, which induces a profound immunodeficiency in infected individuals, encodes proteins that cause decreased expression of class I heavy chain. We now report that the HIV Tat protein, which is a potent transactivator of viral transcription, is also a potent repressor of the beta2-microglobulin gene. Repression is mediated through the basal promoter of the beta2-microglobulin gene, which is shown to be predominantly regulated by an initiator element. Tat repression is further augmented by the short viral transcript, TAR, which interacts with Tat. Tat-mediated repression of beta2-microglobulin expression, together with its known repression of class I gene transcription, provides an effective mechanism by which HIV could prevent cell surface expression of the MHC class I complex and avoid immune surveillance.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

AP-2beta represses D(1A) dopamine receptor gene transcription in neuro2a cells.

Expression of the D(1A) dopamine receptor in brain is restricted to specific neuronal populations. To investigate the mechanism of this selective expression, we localized a silencer upstream of the human D(1A) gene and identified its binding transcription factor in the D(1A)-negative neural cell line Neuro2a. Using deletion CAT analysis, we narrowed this silencer to the region between nucleotides -561 and -532 relative to the CAP site. This 30-bp region, designated D1AS1, contains a sequence homologous to the AP-2 binding site and binds to a factor that also interacts with the AP-2 consensus sequence. In gel supershift assays, this factor is recognized by anti-AP-2beta antibody. Co-transfection of Neuro2a cells with an AP-2beta expression vector repressed the basal CAT activity of D(1A) promoter-reporter plasmids in a D1AS1-dependent manner. RT-PCR analysis indicated that, among AP-2 family members, Neuro2a cells express only AP-2beta. Furthermore, co-transfection of these cells with decoy oligonucleotides corresponding to the D1AS1 sequence de-repressed the D(1A) gene promoter. Unlike in Neuro2a cells, AP-2beta could not repress the D(1A) promoter in the D(1A)-positive neural cell line, NS20Y. In addition, the expression of AP-2beta in different brain regions does not inversely correlate with that of D(1A) dopamine receptor. These observations taken together indicate that AP-2beta is a repressive transcription factor that acts on the D1AS1 silencer of the D(1A) dopamine receptor gene via some cell-specific mechanism(s) in Neuro2a.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

C-myc represses transiently transfected HLA class I promoter sequences not locus-specifically.

Overexpression of the c-myc oncogene is frequently accompanied by downregulation of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC, HLA in humans) class I antigens. In human melanoma c-myc overexpression downmodulates HLA-B expression, whereas HLA-A is hardly affected. Repression of HLA-B is mediated through the core promoter, containing a CAAT-box and a non-conventional TATA-box. We show evidence that in transient transfection assays the HLA-A2 and HLA-B7 promoters are repressed by c-myc to the same extent. Therefore, other sequences of the HLA-A and HLA-B genes, possibly intron/exon sequences, should contribute to the locus B-specificity of the downregulation. Furthermore, c-myc does not seem to alter binding of protein complexes to the CAAT- or TATA-box of HLA-B7 or HLA-A2 in gel retardation assays. Comparison of promoters repressed by c-myc reveals a weak consensus sequence of the initiator (Inr) element: TCA(+1)YYYNY. The presence of a TCA sequence in the initiator region of the MHC class I promoter makes downregulation by c-myc through the Inr likely. We speculate that the Inr contributes to MHC class I promoter activity by stimulating recruitment of TFIID to the weak, non-conventional TATA-box, thereby making it susceptible to repression by c-myc through the Inr.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2001

Cell type-specific roles of histone deacetylase in TR ligand-independent transcriptional repression.

Recent evidence indicates that corepressor protein with histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity mediates thyroid hormone receptor (TR) transcriptional repression. In order to examine the physiological relevance of HDAC in ligand-independent TR-mediated repression, we studied the effect of trichostatin A (TSA), a specific HDAC inhibitor, in transient transfection studies with natural reporters, and assessed the expression of TR-regulated endogenous genes. Luciferase-coupled DR4-, F2-, PAL- or GH-TREs and TRbeta1 expression vectors were cotransfected in CV-1 and GH(3) cells. We did not observe any effect of TSA on TR-induced basal repression in CV-1 cells. Instead, TSA was able to induce an increase in transcription without T(3) on all TREs tested in GH(3) cells. This increase was >7-fold on F2-, >4-fold on DR4-, and 3-fold on GH-TREs. The cotransfection of a TRbeta1 mutant that exhibits decreased affinity with N-CoR (AHT) reduced the TSA effect in GH(3) cells, demonstrating a primary role for TR/N-CoR/Sin3/HDAC complex. Next, we examined the effects of TSA on endogenous GH mRNA production in GH(3) cells by Northern blot analysis. We observed an increase of 50-70% of GH mRNA in cells treated with TSA in hypothyroid medium, and an increase of GH mRNA in T(3)-treated cells after TSA treatment. Our results show that TSA can increase the expression of endogenous genes that are susceptible to TR regulation. These results support an active role of HDAC in transcriptional repression by ligand-independent TR.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Repression of androgen-regulated gene expression by dominant negative androgen receptors.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription activator responsible for male sexual development. In order to specifically inhibit the AR pathway, dominant negative ARs were constructed by inactivation of the major transactivation domains of the wild type AR and fusing this mutant (AR122) to the Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) repressor domain and/or histone deacetylase (HDAC1). The HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 protein was the most successful dominant negative AR, capable of repressing the wild type AR ninefold when co-expressed at a 1:1 plasmid ratio. A maximal repression of 41-fold was achieved when HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 was cotransfected with the wild type AR at a 4:1 plasmid ratio. HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 repressed transcription in a ligand-dependent manner since it inhibited a constitutively active AR mutant (AR5) only in the presence of agonists. High concentrations of partial agonists such as RU486, cyproterone acetate, and estradiol were also capable of triggering repression by HDAC1-KRAB-AR122. The potent dominant negative AR proteins might prove useful tools to inhibit AR function in vitro and in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Groucho/TLE family proteins and transcriptional repression.

The Drosophila Groucho (Gro) protein is the prototype for a large family of corepressors, examples of which are found in most metazoans. This family includes the human transducin-like Enhancer of split (TLE) proteins. As corepressors, Gro/TLE family proteins do not bind to DNA directly, but rather are recruited to the template by DNA-bound repressor proteins. Gro/TLE family proteins are required for many developmental processes, including lateral inhibition, segmentation, sex determination, dorsal/ventral pattern formation, terminal pattern formation, and eye development. These proteins are characterized by a conserved N-terminal glutamine-rich domain and a conserved C-terminal WD-repeat domain. The primary role of the glutamine-rich domain is apparently to mediate tetramerization, while the WD-repeat domain may mediate interactions with DNA-bound repressors. The glutamine rich and WD-repeat domains are separated by a less conserved region containing domains that have been implicated in transcriptional repression and nuclear localization. In addition to encoding full-length Gro/TLE family proteins, most metazoan genomes encode truncated family members that contain the N-terminal oligomerization domain, but lack the C-terminal WD-repeat domain. These truncated proteins may negatively regulate full-length Gro/TLE proteins, perhaps by sequestering them in non-productive complexes. Gro/TLE family proteins probably repress transcription by multiple mechanisms. For example, a glycine/proline-rich domain in the central variable region functions to recruit the histone deacetylase Rpd3 to the template. This histone deacetylase then presumably silences transcription by altering local chromatin structure. Other repression domains in Gro may function in a histone deacetylase-independent manner. Many aspects of Gro/TLE protein function remain to be explored, including the possible post-translational regulation of Gro/TLE activity as well as the mechanisms by which Gro/TLE proteins direct repression at a distance.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Context-dependent Pax-5 repression of a PU.1/NF-kappaB regulated reporter gene in B lineage cells.

Enhancers located in the 3' end of the locus in part regulate immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene expression. One of these enhancers, HS 1,2, is developmentally regulated by DNA binding proteins like NF-kappaB, Pax-5 and the protein complex NF-alphaP in B lineage cells. Here we report that NF-alphaP is the ets protein PU.1. A glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-pulldown assay demonstrated that PU.1 can physically interact with NF-kappaB in solution. Experiments in COS cells showed that PU.1 and NF-kappaB (p50/c-Rel) can activate transcription of an enhancer linked reporter gene. The paired domain protein Pax-5 has previously been shown to repress enhancer-dependent transcription. Additional co-transfection experiments revealed that PU.1/NF-kappaB dependent transcription could be repressed in a context dependent manner by Pax-5, but not by the paired domain of Pax-5. When the PU.1 binding site was substituted with a binding site for the ets-protein Elf-1, Pax-5 could no longer repress reporter gene activity. Our data indicate a model where Pax-5 mediated repression of the HS 1,2 enhancer requires the recruitment of a co-factor which is dependent on Pax-5/PU.1 but which cannot be recruited by Pax-5/Elf-1.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

GalR-mediated repression and activation of hybrid lacUV5 promoter: differential contacts with RNA polymerase.

The GalR repressor regulates expression of genes of the gal regulon in Escherichia coli. We studied the regulatory effect of GalR in vitro on a heterologous promoter, lacUV5, by placing the GalR-binding site, OE, at different locations upstream of this promoter. Despite the fact that the lacUV5 promoter is transcribed efficiently by RNA polymerase (RNP) alone, GalR modulated transcription from many of the PlacUV5 variants. Depending on the location of OE and the neighboring DNA sequence, GalR repressed, activated or had no effect on the promoter. Both repression and activation involved formation of GalR-RNP-DNA ternary complexes and required an intact c-domain of the alpha subunit of the holoenzyme. These results support the differential contact model of a regulator action, in which a regulator differentially binds to, and lowers the energy of, intermediates of transcription initiation either to hinder or to facilitate a step of initiation. The nature of the contacts depends upon the context, i.e. the geometry of the ternary complex. The observed repression and activation effect of GalR on a heterologous promoter also underscores the point that a regulator is not a dedicated protein for repression or for activation.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed2002

A new translational repression element and unusual transcriptional control regulate expression of don juan during Drosophila spermatogenesis.

The Drosophila don juan (dj) gene encodes a basic protein that is expressed solely in the male germline and shows structural similarities to the linker histone H1. Don Juan is located in two different subcellular structures: in the nucleus during the phase of chromatin condensation and later in the mitochondrial derivatives starting with spermatid individualization. The don juan gene is transcribed in primary spermatocytes under the control of 23 bp upstream in combination with downstream sequences. During meiotic stages and in early spermatid stages don juan mRNA is translationally repressed for several days. Analysis of male sterile mutants which fail to undergo meiosis shows that release of dj mRNA from translational repression is independent of meiosis. In gel retardation assays 60 nucleotides at the end of the dj leader form four major complexes with proteins that were extracted from testes but not with protein extracts from ovaries. Transformation studies prove that in vivo 35 bp within that region of the dj mRNA is essential to confer translational repression. UV cross-linking studies show that a 62 kDa protein specifically binds to the same region within the 5' untranslated region. The dj translational repression element, TRE, is distinct from the translational control element, TCE, described earlier for all members of the Mst(3)CGP gene family. Moreover, expression studies in several male sterile mutants reveal that don juan mRNA is translated in earlier developmental stages during sperm morphogenesis than the Mst(3)CGP mRNAs. This proves that translational activation of dormant mRNAs in spermatogenesis occurs at different time-points which are characteristic for each gene, an essential feature for coordinated sperm morphogenesis.

5' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed2002

Repression through a distal TCF-3 binding site restricts Xenopus myf-5 expression in gastrula mesoderm.

The development of skeletal muscle in the vertebrate embryo is controlled by a transcriptional cascade that includes the four myogenic regulatory factors Myf-5, MyoD, Myogenin, and MRF4. The dynamic expression pattern of myf-5 during myogenesis is thought to be consistent with its role during early determination of the myogenic lineage. To study the factors and mechanisms, which regulate myf-5 transcription in Xenopus, we isolated a genomic DNA clone containing 4858 bp of Xmyf-5 5' flanking region. Using a transgenic reporter assay, we show here that this genomic contig is sufficient to recapitulate the dynamic stage- and tissue-specific expression pattern of Xmyf-5 from the gastrula to tail bud stages. For the primary induction of myf-5 transcription, we identify three main regulatory elements, which are responsible for (i) activation in dorsal mesoderm, (ii) activation in ventral mesoderm, and (iii) repression in midline mesoderm, respectively. Their combined activities define the two-winged expression domain of myf-5 in the preinvoluted mesoderm. Repression in midline mesoderm is mediated by a single TCF binding site located in the 5' end of the -4.8 kbp sequence, which binds XTcf-3 protein in vitro. Endogenous Wnt signaling in the lateral mesoderm is required to overcome the long-range repression through this distal TCF site, and to stimulate myf-5 transcription independently from it. The element for ventral mesoderm activation responds to Activin. Together, these results describe a regulatory mosaic of repression and activation, which defines the myf-5 expression profile in the frog gastrula.

Activins↗
PubMed2001

Transcriptional repression by suppressor of hairless involves the binding of a hairless-dCtBP complex in Drosophila.

Notch is the receptor for a conserved signaling pathway that regulates numerous cell fate decisions during development [1]. Signal transduction involves the presenilin-dependent intracellular processing of Notch and the nuclear translocation of the intracellular domain of Notch, NICD [2-6]. NICD associates with Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], a DNA binding protein, and Mastermind (Mam), a transcriptional coactivator [7-9]. In the absence of Notch signaling, Su(H) acts as a transcriptional repressor [10, 11]. Repression by Su(H) is relieved by the activation of Notch [12-16]. In the Drosophila embryo, this transcriptional switch from repression to activation is important for patterning the expression of the single-minded (sim) gene along the dorsoventral axis [12]. Here, we investigate the mechanisms by which Su(H) inhibits the expression of Notch target genes in Drosophila. We show that Hairless, an antagonist of Notch signaling [17-19], is required to repress the transcription of the sim gene. Hairless forms a DNA-bound complex with Su(H). Furthermore, it directly binds the Drosophila C-terminal Binding Protein (dCtBP), which acts as a transcriptional corepressor. The dCtBP binding motif of Hairless is essential for the function of Hairless in vivo. We propose that Hairless mediates transcriptional repression by Su(H) via the recruitment of dCtBP.

Alcohol Oxidoreductases↗
PubMed2003

Specific induction and carbon/nitrogen repression of arginine catabolism gene of Aspergillus nidulans--functional in vivo analysis of the otaA promoter.

The arginine catabolism gene otaA encoding ornithine transaminase (OTAse) is specifically induced by arginine and is under the control of the broad-domain carbon and nitrogen repression systems. Arginine induction is mediated by a product of arcA gene coding for Zn(2)C(6) activator. We have identified a region responsible for arginine induction in the otaA promoter (AnUAS(arg)). Deletions within this region result in non-inducibility of OTAse by arginine, whether in an arcA(+) strain or in the presence of the arcA(d)47 gain of function allele. AnUAS(arg) is very similar to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae UAS(arg), a sequence bound by the Zn(2)C(6) activator (ArgRIIp), acting in a complex with two MADS-box proteins (McmIp and ArgRIp). We demonstrate here that two CREA in vitro binding sites in the otaA promoter are functional in vivo. CREA is directly involved in carbon repression of the otaA gene and it also reduces its basal level of expression. Although AREA binds to the otaA promoter in vitro, it probably does not participate in nitrogen metabolite repression of the gene in vivo. We show here that another putative negatively acting GATA factor AREB participates directly or indirectly in otaA nitrogen repression. We also demonstrate that the high levels of OTAse activity are an important factor in the suppression of proline auxotrophic mutations. This suppression can be achieved neither by growing of the proline auxotroph under carbon/nitrogen derepressing conditions nor by introducing of a creA(d) mutation.

Arginine↗
PubMed1997

Transcription activation or repression by phage psi 29 protein p4 depends on the strength of the RNA polymerase-promoter interactions.

Phage psi 29 protein p4 activates the late A3 promoter and represses the early A2c promoter, in both cases by binding upstream from RNA polymerase (RNAP) and interacting with the C-terminal domain of the RNAP alpha subunit. To investigate how this interaction leads to activation at PA3 and to repression at PA2c, mutant promoters were constructed. We show that the position of protein p4 relative to that of RNAP, which is different at each promoter, does not dictate the outcome of the interaction. Rather, in the absence of a-35 consensus box for sigma A-RNAP activation was observed, while in its presence repression occurred. The results support the view that stabilization of RNAP at the promoter over a threshold level leads to repression.

Bacillus Phages↗