Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Mandibular Prosthesis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,207 records · Page 67Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Prosthodontic treatment of a patient with hemimandibular elongation: a clinical report.

This clinical report describes prosthodontic treatment of a patient with hemimandibular elongation that resulted in significant dentofacial asymmetry. A maxillary metal-ceramic fixed dental prosthesis and crowns were fabricated. To eliminate the negative horizontal overlap, 3 mandibular teeth were reduced to the gingival level. The mandibular prosthetic restoration was completed with metal and composite resin using an electroforming technique.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated osseous free flaps: a 3-year experience with 24 patients.

Between January of 1998 and May of 2002, 25 prefabricated osseous free flaps (23 fibula and two iliac crest flaps) were transferred in 24 patients to repair maxillary (six flaps) or mandibular (eight flaps) defects after tumor resection, severe maxillary (four flaps) or mandibular (one flap) atrophy (Cawood VI), maxillary (one flap) or mandibular (three flaps) defects after gunshot injury, and maxillary (two flaps) defects after traffic accidents. Prefabrication included insertion of dental implants, positioned with a drilling template in a preplanned position, and split-thickness grafting. Drilling template construction was based on the prosthetic planning. The template determined the position of the implants and the site and angulation of osteotomies, if necessary. The mean delay between prefabrication and flap transfer was 6 weeks (range, 4 to 8 weeks). While the flap was harvested, a bar construction with overdentures was mounted onto the implants. The overdentures were used as an occlusal key for exact three-dimensional positioning of the graft within the defect. The bar construction also helped to stabilize the horseshoe shape of the graft. The follow-up period ranged from 2 months to 4 years (mean, 21 months), during which time two total and three partial flap losses occurred. One total loss was due to thrombosis of the flap veins during the delay period, whereas the other total loss was caused by spasm of the peroneal artery. Two partial losses were due to oversegmentation of the flaps with necrosis of the distal fragment, whereas one partial loss was caused by disruption of the vessel from the distal part. Of the 90 implants that were inserted into the prefabricated flaps during the study period, 10 were lost in conjunction with flap failure; of the remaining 80 implants, four were lost during the observation period, for a success rate of 95 percent. Flap prefabrication based on prosthetic planning offers a powerful tool for various reconstructive problems in the maxillofacial area. Although it involves a two-stage procedure, the time for complete rehabilitation is shorter than with conventional procedures.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed1996

Studies of changes in occlusion after the insertion of complete dentures. Part I.

The present study aims to investigate changes in the occlusion of complete dentures after their insertion. A total of 85 edentulous patients were provided with new complete dentures. Their individual hinge axes were determined using mechanical axiography and the upper finished dentures were transferred by facebows to Dentatus articulators. The lower dentures were mounted according to an intraoral central bearing point (CBP) registration and equilibrated in terminal hinge position. An articulator specially modified for measurements in the condylar area was used. The differences between the positions of the condylar balls with CBP registration and those after equilibrating the occlusion were determined. On average, 19 days after insertion, 71 patients took part in a follow-up examination. As in the first session, the terminal hinge position was registered with the CBP method using the apex of the Gothic arch. Thus, the positions of the condylar balls immediately after the new registration could be compared with those in equilibrated intercuspation 3 weeks earlier. The differences were found to be 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm (0-2.9 mm) in the three axes (sagittal, coronal and horizontal). They are thought to result from settling into the denture bearing tissues and also from neuromuscular adjustment of the masticatory system. Compulsory remounting of complete dentures after insertion is therefore recommended.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2006

Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface.

An implant-abutment interface at the alveolar bone crest is associated with sustained peri-implant inflammation; however, whether magnitude of inflammation is proportionally dependent upon interface position remains unknown. This study compared the distribution and density of inflammatory cells surrounding implants with a supracrestal, crestal, or subcrestal implant-abutment interface. All implants developed a similar pattern of peri-implant inflammation: neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophils) maximally accumulated at or immediately coronal to the interface. However, peri-implant neutrophil accrual increased progressively as the implant-abutment interface depth increased, i.e., subcrestal interfaces promoted a significantly greater maximum density of neutrophils than did supracrestal interfaces (10,512 +/- 691 vs. 2398 +/- 1077 neutrophils/mm(2)). Moreover, inflammatory cell accumulation below the original bone crest was significantly correlated with bone loss. Thus, the implant-abutment interface dictates the intensity and location of peri-implant inflammatory cell accumulation, a potential contributing component in the extent of implant-associated alveolar bone loss.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.

The difference in stress distribution in the bone around dental implants was determined under conditions where either two or four implants were placed in the interforaminal region of the mandible. The purpose was also to determine the influence of the height of the mandible on the stress distribution. The stress distribution around the implants was investigated using three-dimensional finite element models of the interforaminal region of two mandibles with two different stages of resorption. It was concluded that there is no reduction of the extreme principal stresses when the load is distributed over an increasing number of implants. There is a tendency for a gradual stress increase as mandibular height decreases.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed2003

The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture.

BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of Americans older than 65 years of age are fully edentulous, requiring replacement of missing teeth. While the conventional denture may meet the needs of many patients, others require more retention, stability, function and esthetics, especially in the mandible. The implant-supported prosthesis is an alternative to the conventional removable denture. METHODS: This article describes the strengths of the implant-supported mandibular overdenture. The authors also outline the risks of this approach. They performed a review of recent literature to summarize the reported success rate of implants used to support a mandibular overdenture. RESULTS: The literature review indicates that implants placed in the anterior mandible (anterior to the foramen) have a success rate better than 95 percent. Patients have reported a high degree of satisfaction with the implant-supported overdenture. CONCLUSIONS: The literature indicates that implant-supported overdentures in the mandible provide predictable results with improved stability, retention, function and patient satisfaction compared with conventional dentures. Implants placed in the anterior mandible have a success rate equal to or greater than 95 percent. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: When planning treatment for patients with edentulous mandibles, clinicians should consider the implant-supported prosthesis.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Use of the final denture base for the intermaxillary registration in an implant-supported overdenture: technical note.

A method of implant-retained overdenture treatment based on the early use of the final denture base during registration of the maxillomandibular jaw relation is described. Using this stable denture base, an accurate recording of jaw relation and an adequate try-in procedure are facilitated without displacement of the base, especially in the situation of an unfavorable flat edentulous mandibular residual ridge.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed1996

Case report: prosthodontic treatment for the transmandibular implant.

The Transmandibular Implant is a transosteal implant developed to help improve masticatory function in patients with severe mandibular atrophy. It is a functional implant with a rigid box frame design which allows acceptance of masticatory loads in mandibles with minimal bone height. The implant is fabricated of a gold alloy and is placed between the mental foramina from a submental approach. The prosthesis is fabricated as an overdenture and retention is obtained by means of retention sleeves adapted to Dolder bar segments of the superstructure. Denture comfort and function can be greatly improved for patients with severely resorbed mandibles.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed2003

Use of magnetic abutments for short endosseous implants following a fibula bone graft in an oral cancer patient: a case report.

Dental implant treatment is an indispensable portion of oral rehabilitation in patients who are to undergo reconstructive surgery following the removal of an oral cancerous lesion. However, ideal dental implant treatment cannot be achieved easily in patients who have undergone mandibular reconstruction with a free vascularized flap, usually because of the limited length, height, and width of the bone graft. Shorter implants (< 10 mm in length) therefore are occasionally used in vascularized fibula graft sites. In such cases, however, shorter implants tend to be overloaded, thereby endangering its longevity. In this article, we discuss how a magnetic abutment system was introduced for such a patient. This was designed to discourage overloading of the mandatory short implants. The outcome was successful without overloading 1.5 years after the placing of the mandibular overdenture.

Bone Transplantation↗
PubMed2006

A cast metal core for a deformed implant body: case report.

The present report consists of a clinical evaluation of an osseointegrated implant using a cast metal core instead of abutment for a deformed implant body. The intramobile connector insert for the implant in the mandibular left first premolar region broke 7 years after the superstructure was attached to the implant system. The intramobile connector insert was replaced, and the prosthesis was reattached, but the new intramobile connector insert broke again 2 weeks later. A thorough examination confirmed deformation of the upper section of the implant body in the mandibular left first molar region. Breakage of the new intramobile connector insert in the mandibular left first premolar region was believed to be due to deformation of the implant body in the mandibular left first molar region. Therefore, a cast metal core was used to deal with the deformation of the implant body in this region. Although slight bone resorption was observed around the implant body after 5 years, no major problems were found in the implant body itself.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Bone loss in the oral cavity.

Bone loss in the oral cavity may occur due to many causes, including infection, systemic or local alterations in the host response, or multifactorial causes. The purpose of this article is to review our present understanding of the major causes of oral bone loss in adults, with special emphasis on two major oral diseases: periodontitis and residual ridge resorption. Periodontitis is characterized by resorption of the alveolar bone as well as loss of the soft tissue attachment to the tooth. Progressive periodontitis will result in continued alveolar bone loss and may result in tooth mobility, abscesses, and ultimately tooth loss. Although the reported prevalence may vary according to the epidemiologic study design, the 1985 National Survey of Oral Health of United States Adults indicated that 94% of female senior citizens examined demonstrated at least one site with at least 2 mm loss of attachment. Resorption of alveolar bone that occurs following tooth extraction is termed residual ridge resorption. In many cases, the denture will loosen because of the inability of the resorbed ridge to stabilize the prosthesis. In the most severe cases, the denture may impinge on the exposed mandibular nerve, resulting in pain or total inability to tolerate the prostheses. Although clear statistics on the prevalence of residual ridge resorption are not available, this boss loss may result in the need for new dentures to replace ill-fitting prostheses.

Adult↗