[Value of hysteroscopy in the removal of intrauterine devices lacking an examination string].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This paper presents a study analysing 100 cases of contraceptive failure and an equal number of controls in Nairobi. The study population included all the patients who attended the antenatal clinic at Kenyatta National Hospital, during a ten-week study period and who had conceived while on a contraceptive method. The controls were patients who were carrying a planned pregnancy. The objective of the study was to determine the sociodemographic patterns, level of counselling and attitudes of patients who presented to antenatal clinic after contraceptive failure and to formulate recommendation on how to manage these patients. User failure was more common than method failure. High parity and a high number of living children were associated with increased risk of contraceptive failure (OR 3.7 and 4.6, respectively). Other factors found to be associated with increased risk of contraceptive failure were: inadequate counselling at contraceptive initiation (OR 4.0), poor knowledge of different contraceptive methods (OR 1.9), short duration of contraceptive use (OR 3.3), and non-compliance, with 40% of the cases having been non-compliant. Thirty per cent of the patients who had contraceptive failure were unhappy about the pregnancy. This paper finds that better counselling on contraceptive use and compliance would reduce contraceptive failure and diminish the negative programme effects of failed contraception. Counselling would also enhance acceptance of the pregnancy and minimise the chances of negative psychological sequelae.
Pakistan is one of the most populous nations in the world, with an annual growth rate of 2.8 and high total fertility rate, even among developing nations. The Pakistan Reproductive Health and Family Planning Survey highlighted the wide gap between knowledge (97%) and use of contraceptives (28%) among currently married women. Our actual need is to enhance contraceptive practice in our country. This study was designed to investigate contraceptive knowledge and practice in Pakistani women attending a tertiary care hospital. This questionnaire-based study was conducted at the Gynaecology Unit II of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Fatima Jinnah Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 204 married women of reproductive age were interviewed by a registrar to record their age, occupation, educational status, number of children, knowledge about contraceptive methods, source of the knowledge, attitudes and practices of contraception. About 57% of women were between 26 and 35 years of age, while 52% of men were between 31 and 40 years. Educational status of the majority of females was below matriculation (33%), while 34% males were above matriculation; 88% of females were housewives and less than 1% of men were out of work. Regarding the social status of couples, 64% were living on income less than 5000 rupees /month (about 60 pound sterling). Of the women, 67% were para 2-5; 68% had some sort of awareness regarding contraception. The main source of information was television (26%) and relatives (24%). The majority knew about the pill (68%) and IUCD (55%). Only 47% were using some sort of contraception. The most common method chosen was the barrier method (15%), followed by IUCD (10%) and the pill (10%). The least common methods were sterilisation (2%) and the rhythm method (2%); 85% of the women and 74% of the men in the study group had a positive attitude toward contraception. In order to improve contraceptive use in Pakistan we need to use multiple media sources to educate couples and their parents regarding contraceptive services, strengthen the perceptions that religion not only allows but also recommends family planning and to create awareness among women to have their rights and opinions about the size of family. The concept of differentiation between sons and daughters should be discouraged. In addition government and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) should organise groups to provide counselling and promotion of contraceptive services at the doorstep. We must act as a team to control our growth rate for economic stabilisation of the country and to raise the living standards of our people.
The authors present a continuation of the thesis suggesting that the most rational procedure for regulating fertility is a perfectly safe, even though not completely effective, contraceptive method combined with safe methods for terminating pregnancy when the contraceptive fails. This analysis demonstrates that, compared with the risk of death from pregnancy and childbirth, major reversible methods of fertility control--the pill, IUDs, condoms, and diaphragms--and abortion are associated with very low levels of mortality. The exception to this statement is pill use after age 40 by women who smoke. This analysis also confirms the very low mortality associated with using the condom and diaphragm with early induced abortion as a backup to terminate pregnancies resulting from contraceptive failures.
During the 21-month period between August 1, 1991, and April 30, 1993, 2,358 women received Norplant system insertions in either Parkland Memorial Hospital or the Dallas Maternal Health and Family Planning clinics. Forty-three percent of these women were teenagers with 14% 16 years of age or less. Overall, 431 patients received Norplant implants insertions postpartum prior to discharge from the hospital. To date, 138 Norplant systems have been removed, with the proportion of contraceptive implant removals among teenagers being essentially the same as that in more mature women. Of the reasons given by women discontinuing the Norplant system, an unanticipated high incidence of pain in the arm containing the implants, hair loss, and mood changes were noted. We have found the Norplant system to be a highly effective and highly acceptable contraceptive method for a large number of indigent women.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to measure rates of planned pregnancy and factors affecting these rates after use of very-long-acting contraceptive methods (Norplant or Norplant II implants, a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device, or the copper T (model TCu 380Ag) intrauterine contraceptive device. STUDY DESIGN: The design was a concurrent, multicenter prospective study of 372 women who stopped contraception for planned pregnancy. Analysis was by life-table, log-rank, and standard chi 2 methods. RESULTS: Pregnancy rates 12 and 24 months after cessation of contraceptive use were 82 and 89 per 100, respectively. Age at removal and family planning intentions at initiation of contraception were both significantly correlated with pregnancy rates (p less than 0.05), but former contraceptive regimen and duration of contraceptive use were not. Pregnancy outcomes did not deviate from normal limits and did not differ by contraceptive formerly used. CONCLUSION: Contraceptive implants releasing 30 micrograms/day of levonorgestrel or intrauterine contraceptive devices releasing 20 micrograms/day of levonorgestrel or having copper surface areas of 380 mm2 are associated with normal fertility after use for women seeking pregnancy at termination. Durations of use do not affect pregnancy rates.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A study of the acceptability of Uniplant, a 12-month single implant of nomegestrol acetate, included 819 women from Africa, Latin America, and China, participating in a clinical trial of Uniplant. A standard, pre-coded questionnaire was specially designed for this purpose and applied at the moment of removal of implant, either at the end of 12 months of use or at the time of discontinuation for whatever reason. The level of satisfaction proved high when users' comparison with their previous contraceptive method, users' recommendation of Uniplant to others, users' intention to use the method in the future, and service satisfaction were taken into consideration. Uniplant was considered easy to use, safe (low risk of pregnancy), and also to cause fewer side effects than other methods. When asked about the least liked feature of Uniplant, almost half the respondents said that there was nothing that they disliked and about one-third mentioned the changes in their menstrual pattern. However, according to the clinical trial, over half of the Uniplant users have bleeding patterns similar to untreated cycles. The majority of respondents did not feel any discomfort during the procedure of insertion and removal of the implant. About 70% of patients in the study stated that they required contraception for more than one year and most of these women said that they did not mind having to change the implant every year.
I started having sexual relations at 10 with a girl at the same school who was almost my age. We did not have anything to protect against pregnancy or diseases. I did not know about contraceptive methods then. I learned about these methods in a sex education program. It helped me control myself and show my school buddies what to do to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancies. After the training, I lost my shame about things that would have seemed forbidden before. I am no longer afraid to express myself about sexuality, a subject that was taboo during my childhood. I learned about family planning centers through the training too. At one clinic, it is easy to get condoms because the person who serves there is young and we can trust him. With older people, one is not so at ease asking for condoms. Before that, I got condoms at the pharmacy, but I did not get them myself. I asked someone who is a little older and could buy them without fear to get them. Someone as young as me is not well thought of in pharmacies, and one fears running into family members or friend of the family. A year ago when I used a condom, the girl thought I wanted to humiliate her. Another time, I had some condoms but I did not use them because I did not have enough courage to propose that. With another girl, I asked her the first day of her period to find out if she was fertile or not. That was a little difficult for me. Now that I have been in training, I found out that it is normal to use a condom and it is good to protect oneself against disease. I may be that I am the one who carries the disease. It's also good to protect against pregnancy, because I go out with girls my age. Now when I am with a girl, I propose using a condom, I try to convince her, and if she refuses, I don't have sex with her. So I'm no longer afraid of pregnancy or disease.
Oral contraceptive agents (OCs) containing levonorgestrel, 150 micrograms, and ethinyl estradiol, 30 micrograms, account for almost half the sales of such agents in the United Kingdom. The remarkable success of this formulation has occurred primarily because it provides extremely low doses of both hormonal constituents yet still gives most users a very acceptable bleeding pattern: the incidence of breakthrough bleeding is about 6% and of amenorrhea, less than 3%. Approximately 90% of users have cycle lengths of 28 +/- 3 days. The risk of serious side effects is significantly lower than with formulas containing higher doses of progestogen and/or estrogen. Minor side effects occur in only a small percentage of cycles. Headache is reported in approximately 10% of all cycles and should be regarded as a potential indicator of increased risk. If it presents as focal migraine, use of the combined OC should be discontinued. The contraceptive effectiveness of the 150/30 formulation is similar to that of the 50 micrograms formulations among compliant women; in less compliant women the margin of error is reduced, and the possibility of an increased risk of accidental pregnancy must be considered.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the experience of the users of a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (Nor-plant) and reasons for early removal. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred fifty-one women who had Norplant placed through the Ohio State University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology were sent a questionnaire that included general demographic questions and questions regarding preplacement education; reasons for choosing Norplant; problems experienced due to Norplant; reasons for removal, if applicable; and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred eleven questionnaires (44%) were completed and analyzed. Twenty-four (21.6%) of patients had Norplant removed, 32 (28.8%) planned on early removal, and 55 (49.5%) desired continued use. Ninety-eight percent of women who planned continued use of Norplant had received reading material as part of their preplacement counseling and 95% felt adequately counseled. This is significantly higher than women who had Norplant removed or planned on early removal. Convenience, problems with other contraceptive methods and effectiveness were the most important reasons why patients chose Norplant. Menstrual changes were the most common side effect, experienced by 80% of all women in the study. Weight gain, headache, mood changes, mastalgia and acne were also frequently reported. Women who had Norplant removed were significantly more likely to have experienced dizziness when compared to women desiring continued use. Women planning early removal were also more likely to have experienced dizziness in addition to acne, headache, hair loss and other side effects. Menstrual irregularities, followed by mood changes and headaches, were the most important side effects associated with early Norplant removal. Overall, 68% of users were at least somewhat satisfied with Norplant. CONCLUSION: Norplant contraception was a satisfactory form of birth control for the majority of patients in the study despite the frequent occurrence of side effects. Reading material regarding benefits and side effects of Norplant is an important aspect of patient counseling and may improve long-term use of Norplant.
Low-income African-American women (N = 178) entering health clinics completed surveys assessing perceived barriers to condom use for themselves personally and for African-American women generally. Following the survey, each woman received a demonstration of five barrier contraceptive methods and then rated her preference among those methods. The women perceived relatively few personal barriers to use of the male condom but perceived significantly greater barriers for other African-American women (all p < .0001). The male condom was first choice of the largest percentage of women (45%) and last choice of the smallest percentage of women (11%). The male condom was preferred for its convenience, availability, and safety, although the necessity for active cooperation by the male partner was considered a hindrance to using the method. Only 23% of women ranked the female condom as first choice and 35% ranked the female condom as last choice. Reasons for selecting the female condom included preference for a female-controlled method, safety, and protection. However, the female condom was perceived to be uncomfortable, to require the partner's acquiescence, and to interfere with sexual experience. Differences in the women's perceptions of barriers to condom use for themselves and for other African-American women are consistent with Weinstein's theory of optimistic bias. Preferences among barrier methods indicate that further research and product development are needed to develop barrier methods that are female-controlled, do not require the awareness of the male partner, and are safe, comfortable, and convenient.
Increased adolescent sexual activity in the past decade has resulted in corresponding increases in pregnancy, childbirth, and abortion, as well as a changing spectrum of sexually transmitted diseases. Contraceptive use in this age group remains limited and is subject to developmental, peer, family, and cultural influences. The most appropriate contraceptive methods may differ among adolescents when compared with older parous women based upon such factors as efficacy, availability, cost, side effects, reversibility, and the need for preplanning. This review updates changes in patterns of contraceptive use among adolescents, presents recent data on both the benefits and the potential risks of the oral contraceptive pill, and addresses the risk of complications with the intrauterine device. The possible teratogenicity of spermicides, the risk of toxic shock syndrome with barrier methods of contraception, and controversy about the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate are explored. Newly introduced methods such as the triphasic pill, vaginal sponge, cervical cap, spermicidal condom, and a simplified approach to postcoital contraception are discussed. Finally, recent compliance studies conducted among adolescents are reviewed.