Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Body Patterning”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,207 records · Page 67Linked to original sources

The effect of dominant vestigial alleles upon vestigial-mediated wing patterning during development of Drosophila melanogaster.

The vestigial gene product is required for the completion of wing development in Drosophila melanogaster. In the absence of vestigial gene expression, cells within the larval wing and haltere imaginal discs fail to proliferate normally thus producing adults with severely reduced wings. Of a large number of vestigial mutations that have been characterized, only two are currently known to exist, vestigial(U) and vestigial(W), which manifest a significant dominant phenotype. Both are associated with chromosomal inversions that fuse the majority of the vestigial coding regions to other genes; mastermind in vestigial(U) and invected in vestigial(W) Examination of vestigial expression in the presence of these dominant alleles shows alterations in the disc-specific expression of vestigial during later stages of larval development. These patterning disruptions are specific to cells of the wing imaginal disc, as significant suppression of total levels of vestigial expression within entire larvae could not be detected. This dominant interference of vestigial patterning appears to be mediated in part by the vestigial coding sequences that are within the gene fusions. Further evidence that the dominant phenotype is the result of disrupted vestigial patterning comes from observations that the dominant alleles can be partially suppressed by mutations within the Drosophila-epidermal growth factor receptor gene. Mutagenesis of vestigial(U) and vestigial(W) produced a series of alleles with partially dominant phenotypes that restored various amounts of the adult wing. These phenotypes can be correlated with alterations in specific portions of the vestigial sequences associated with the dominant alleles. In the presence of these partially dominant alleles, wing imaginal discs have significantly more cells which express vestigial compared with the number associated with the original dominant phenotype. Additionally, eliminating some of the dominant effect causes alterations in the patterns of early stage apoptotic cell death associated with dominant vestigial alleles. Utilizing these new vestigial alleles, it is possible to correlate the consequence of altered vestigial expression to subsequent changes in patterning of the wing disc.

Animals↗

Control of anteroposterior and dorsoventral domains of Nkx-6.1 gene expression relative to other Nkx genes during vertebrate CNS development.

Here we report the isolation, sequence and developmental expression in the central nervous system of several members of the chicken and mouse Nkx gene family. These are among the earliest genes to be regionally expressed in the neural plate; they are expressed just above the axial mesendoderm (prechordal mesendoderm and notochord). Each Nkx gene has a distinct spatial pattern of expression along the anterior-posterior axis of the ventral central nervous system: Nkx-2. 2 is expressed along the entire axis, whereas Nkx-2.1 is restricted to the forebrain, and Nkx-6.1 and Nkx-6.2 are largely excluded from the forebrain. They are also expressed in distinct patterns along the dorsal-ventral axis. These genes are expressed in both the ventricular and mantle zones; in the mantle zone Nkx-6.1 is co-expressed with Islet-1 in a subset of motor neurons. Like other Nkx genes, expression of Nkx-6.1 is induced by the axial mesendoderm and by sonic hedgehog protein. BMP-7 represses Nkx-6.1 expression. While the notochord can induce Nkx-6.1 expression in the anterior neural plate, sonic hedgehog protein does not, suggesting that the notochord produces additional molecules that can regulate ventral patterning.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Dorsal and ventral retinal territories defined by retinoic acid synthesis, break-down and nuclear receptor expression.

Determination of the dorso-ventral dimension of the vertebrate retina is known to involve retinoic acid (RA), in that high RA activates expression of a ventral retinaldehyde dehydrogenase and low RA of a dorsal dehydrogenase. Here we show that in the early eye vesicle of the mouse embryo, expression of the dorsal dehydrogenase is preceded by, and transiently overlaps with, the RA-degrading oxidase CYP26. Subsequently in the embryonic retina, CYP26 forms a narrow horizontal boundary between the dorsal and ventral dehydrogenases, creating a trough between very high ventral and moderately high dorsal RA levels. Most of the RA receptors are expressed uniformly throughout the retina except for the RA-sensitive RARbeta, which is down-regulated in the CYP26 stripe. The orphan receptor COUP-TFII, which modulates RA responses, colocalizes with the dorsal dehydrogenase. The organization of the embryonic vertebrate retina into dorsal and ventral territories divided by a horizontal boundary has parallels to the division of the Drosophila eye disc into dorsal, equatorial and ventral zones, indicating that the similarities in eye morphogenesis extend beyond single molecules to topographical patterns.

Aldehyde Oxidoreductases↗

Activity-regulated, cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc) is essential for visceral endoderm organization during early embryogenesis.

Activity-regulated, cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc) was first identified as an immediate-early gene regulated by synaptic activity. We have studied its functional role in vivo using a gene-targeting approach. We found that Arc is encoded by a single exon, and Arc mRNA is ubiquitously expressed in early mouse embryos. Homozygous Arc mutants are severely growth-retarded, fail to gastrulate and subsequently die before day 8.5 of embryogenesis. Further analysis revealed severe disorganization of visceral endoderm formation, and total separation and ectopic location of embryonic and extraembryonic structure. These findings demonstrate that Arc function is essential for early embryo development and patterning in mice, and support the hypothesis that signaling from visceral endoderm is essential for normal patterning of the extraembryonic and embryonic structure.

Animals↗

Drosophila wing melanin patterns form by vein-dependent elaboration of enzymatic prepatterns.

BACKGROUND: Animal melanin patterns are involved in diverse aspects of their ecology, from thermoregulation to mimicry. Many theoretical models have simulated pigment patterning, but little is known about the developmental mechanisms of color pattern formation. In Drosophila melanogaster, several genes are known to be necessary for cuticular melanization, but the involvement of these genes in melanin pattern evolution is unknown. We have taken a genetic approach to elucidate the developmental mechanisms underlying melanin pattern formation in various drosophilids. RESULTS: We show that, in D. melanogaster, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopa decarboxylase (DDC) are required for melanin synthesis. Ectopic expression of TH, but not DDC, alone was sufficient to cause ectopic melanin patterns in the wing. Thus, changes in the level of expression of a single gene can result in a new level of melanization. The ontogeny of this ectopic melanization resembled that found in Drosophila species bearing wing melanin patterns and in D. melanogaster ebony mutants. Importantly, we discovered that in D. melanogaster and three other Drosophila species these wing melanin patterns are dependent upon and shaped by the circulation patterns of hemolymph in the wing veins. CONCLUSIONS: Complex wing melanin patterns are determined by two distinct developmental mechanisms. Spatial prepatterns of enzymatic activity are established late in wing development. Then, in newly eclosed adults, melanin precursors gradually diffuse out from wing veins and are oxidized into dark brown or black melanin. Both the prepatterning and hemolymph-supplied components of this system can change during evolution to produce color pattern diversity.

Animals↗

A role for the extraembryonic yolk syncytial layer in patterning the zebrafish embryo suggested by properties of the hex gene.

Recent studies in mouse suggest that the extraembryonic endoderm has an important role in early embryonic patterning [1]. To analyze whether similar mechanisms operate in other vertebrates, we cloned the zebrafish homologue of Hex, a homeobox gene that is expressed asymmetrically in the mouse visceral endoderm [2]. Early expression of zebrafish hex is restricted to the dorsal portion of the yolk syncytial layer (YSL), an extraembryonic tissue. By the onset of gastrulation, hex is expressed in the entire dorsal half of the YSL, which directly underlies the cells fated to form the neural plate. We show that hex expression is initially regulated by the maternal Wnt pathway and later by a Bmp-mediated pathway. Overexpression experiments of wild-type and chimeric Hex constructs indicate that Hex functions as a transcriptional repressor and its overexpression led to the downregulation of bmp2b and wnt8 expression and the expansion of chordin expression. These findings provide further evidence that the zebrafish YSL is the functional equivalent of the mouse visceral endoderm and that extraembryonic structures may regulate early embryonic patterning in many vertebrates.

Animals↗

Gremlin is the BMP antagonist required for maintenance of Shh and Fgf signals during limb patterning.

During limb outgrowth, signaling by bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) must be moderated to maintain the signaling loop between the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) and the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). Gremlin, an extracellular Bmp antagonist, has been proposed to fulfill this function and therefore be important in limb patterning. We tested this model directly by mutating the mouse gene encoding gremlin (Cktsf1b1, herein called gremlin). In the mutant limb, the feedback loop between the ZPA and the AER is interrupted, resulting in abnormal skeletal pattern. We also show that the gremlin mutation is allelic to the limb deformity mutation (ld). Although Bmps and their antagonists have multiple roles in limb development, these experiments show that gremlin is the principal BMP antagonist required for early limb outgrowth and patterning.

Animals↗

Neural induction and patterning by fibroblast growth factor, notochord and somite tissue in Xenopus.

Two natural neural inducing sources have been used, the notochord and the somites together with the growth factor bFGF, to investigate the anterior/posterior patterning of neural tissue in an animal cap explant model in Xenopus laevis. Notochord and somite tissue from stages 12.5/13 and 16, respectively, were manually isolated, and combined heterochronically with responding animal cap ectoderm aged to gastrula stages. Somite recombinants were also constructed with animal caps injected with noggin mRNA. The responses of the ectoderm were analyzed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of marker gene expression, and in some cases by in situ hybridization. The requirement for FGF receptor function was analyzed using the dominant negative FGF receptor (XFD). The experiments showed that bFGF is capable of direct neural induction in caps aged to stage 10.5. It was also shown that notochords are capable of inducing anterior neural tissue in gastrula stage animal cap ectoderm, and this induction is sensitive to XFD in the responding tissue. Injection of noggin mRNA results in the induction of anterior neural differentiation, and it was demonstrated that this induction was insensitive to the expression of XFD in the responding tissue. It was also shown that somite tissue recombined with gastrula stage animal cap ectoderm, can induce both anterior and posterior nervous tissue and can also posteriorize noggin-induced anterior neural tissue when combined with noggin-injected animal cap ectoderm. This response is partially sensitive to XFD expression. The results shed light on the role of competence of animal cap ectoderm and the signals from postgastrulation axial and paraxial mesoderm in the patterning of the amphibian nervous system.

Animals↗

Gelsolin is a dorsalizing factor in zebrafish.

The gene for gelsolin (an actin-binding, cytoskeletal regulatory protein) was shown earlier to be specialized for high corneal expression in adult zebrafish. We show here that zebrafish gelsolin is required for proper dorsalization during embryogenesis. Inhibition of gelsolin expression by injecting fertilized eggs with a specific morpholino oligonucleotide resulted in a range of concentration-dependent ventralized phenotypes, including those lacking a brain and eyes. These were rescued by coinjection of zebrafish gelsolin or chordin (a known dorsalizing agent) mRNAs, or human gelsolin protein. Moreover, injection of gelsolin mRNA or human gelsolin protein by itself dorsalized the developing embryos, often resulting in axis duplication. Injection of the gelsolin-specific morpholino oligonucleotide enhanced the expression of Vent mRNA, a ventral marker downstream of bone morphogenetic proteins, whereas injection of gelsolin mRNA enhanced the expression of chordin and goosecoid mRNAs, both dorsal markers. Our results indicate that gelsolin also modulates embryonic dorsalventral pattern formation in zebrafish.

Animals↗

Genetic and embryological approaches to studies of neural tube defects: a critical review. NTD Collaborative Group.

Experimental embryological models have suggested that the morphology and quantity of neural tube defects may be governed by their position along the anteroposterior axis of the embryo. Inductive interactions and genetic regulation during axis development may play a role in the patterning of neural tube defects. A major challenge in the study of human neural tube defects is determining whether the spectrum of developmental neural tube anomalies found in individuals and their families mirror experimental models and are regulated by similar processes. We have found that the various neural tube defect phenotypes can be clustered according to their position along the anteroposterior axis. The findings correlate well to the pattern of early genes expression, inductive models of the embryonic axis, and mutant NTD animal models. We suggest that NTD should be studied by their location along the anteroposterior axis and that specific mutant genes may be identified by the observed pattern of NTD in an individual or a family.

Animals↗

Role of Pitx1 upstream of Tbx4 in specification of hindlimb identity.

In spite of recent breakthroughs in understanding limb patterning, the genetic factors determining the differences between the forelimb and the hindlimb have not been understood. The genes Pitx1 and Tbx4 encode transcription factors that are expressed throughout the developing hindlimb but not forelimb buds. Misexpression of Pitx1 in the chick wing bud induced distal expression of Tbx4, as well as HoxC10 and HoxC11, which are normally restricted to hindlimb expression domains. Wing buds in which Pitx1 was misexpressed developed into limbs with some morphological characteristics of hindlimbs: the flexure was altered to that normally observed in legs, the digits were more toe-like in their relative size and shape, and the muscle pattern was transformed to that of a leg.

Animals↗

Delta-Notch lateral inhibitory patterning in the emergence of ciliated cells in Xenopus: experimental observations and a gene network model.

In diverse vertebrate and invertebrate systems, lateral inhibition through the Delta-Notch signaling pathway can lead to cells in initially uniform epithelial tissues differentiating in "salt-and-pepper", regular spacing patterns. In this paper we examine lateral inhibition during the emergence of ciliated cells in Xenopus embryonic skin, using experimental manipulations of the Delta-Notch pathway and a connectionist gene-network model of the process. The results of our model are in agreement with previous models of regular patterning through lateral inhibition and reproduce the observations of our experimental assays. Moreover, the model provides an account for the variability of embryonic responses to the experimental assays, points to a component of lateral inhibition that may be the chief source of this variability, and suggests ways to control it. Our model could thus serve as a tool to generate predictions about this and other regular patterning systems governed by lateral inhibition.

Animals↗

Patterning mechanisms controlling vertebrate limb development.

Vertebrate limb buds are embryonic structures for which much molecular and cellular data are known regarding the mechanisms that control pattern formation during development. Specialized regions of the developing limb bud, such as the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA), the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), and the non-ridge ectoderm, direct and coordinate the development of the limb bud along the anterior-posterior (AP), dorsal-ventral (DV), and proximal-distal (PD) axes, giving rise to a stereotyped pattern of elements well conserved among tetrapods. In recent years, specific gene functions have been shown to mediate the organizing and patterning activities of the ZPA, the AER, and the non-ridge ectoderm. The analysis of these gene functions has revealed the existence of complex interactions between signaling pathways operated by secreted factors of the HH, TGF-beta/BMP, WNT, and FGF superfamilies, which interact with many other genetic networks to control limb positioning, outgrowth, and patterning. The study of limb development has helped to establish paradigms for the analysis of pattern formation in many other embryonic structures and organs.

Animals↗

Anatomic patterning in the expression of vestibulosympathetic reflexes.

To investigate the possibility that expression of vestibulosympathetic reflexes (VSR) is related to a nerve's anatomic location rather than its target organ, we compared VSR recorded from the same type of postganglionic fiber [muscle vasoconstrictor (MVC)] located at three different rostrocaudal levels: hindlimb, forelimb, and face. Experiments were performed on chloralose-anesthetized cats, and vestibular afferents were stimulated electrically. Single MVC unit activity was extracted by spike shape analysis of few-fiber recordings, and unit discrimination was confirmed by autocorrelation. Poststimulus time histogram analysis revealed that about half of the neurons were initially inhibited by vestibular stimulation (type 1 response), whereas the other MVC fibers were initially strongly excited (type 2 response). MVC units with types 1 and 2 responses were present in the same nerve fascicle. Barosensitivity was equivalent in the two groups, but fibers showing type 1 responses fired significantly faster than those giving type 2 responses (0.29 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.20 +/- 0.02 Hz). Nerve fibers with type 1 responses were most common in the hindlimb (21 of 29 units) and least common in the face (2 of 11 units), the difference in relative proportion being significant (P < 0.05, chi(2) test). These results support the hypothesis that VSR are anatomically patterned.

Action Potentials↗

Segment polarity and DV patterning gene expression reveals segmental organization of the Drosophila brain.

The insect brain is traditionally subdivided into the trito-, deuto- and protocerebrum. However, both the neuromeric status and the course of the borders between these regions are unclear. The Drosophila embryonic brain develops from the procephalic neurogenic region of the ectoderm, which gives rise to a bilaterally symmetrical array of about 100 neuronal precursor cells, called neuroblasts. Based on a detailed description of the spatiotemporal development of the entire population of embryonic brain neuroblasts, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the expression of segment polarity genes (engrailed, wingless, hedgehog, gooseberry distal, mirror) and DV patterning genes (muscle segment homeobox, intermediate neuroblast defective, ventral nervous system defective) in the procephalic neuroectoderm and the neuroblast layer (until stage 11, when all neuroblasts are formed). The data provide new insight into the segmental organization of the procephalic neuroectodem and evolving brain. The expression patterns allow the drawing of clear demarcations between trito-, deuto- and protocerebrum at the level of identified neuroblasts. Furthermore, we provide evidence indicating that the protocerebrum (most anterior part of the brain) is composed of two neuromeres that belong to the ocular and labral segment, respectively. These protocerebral neuromeres are much more derived compared with the trito- and deutocerebrum. The labral neuromere is confined to the posterior segmental compartment. Finally, similarities in the expression of DV patterning genes between the Drosophila and vertebrate brains are discussed.

Animals↗

Glypican 4 modulates FGF signalling and regulates dorsoventral forebrain patterning in Xenopus embryos.

Heparan sulphate proteoglycans such as glypicans are essential modulators of intercellular communication during embryogenesis. In Xenopus laevis embryos, the temporal and spatial distribution of Glypican 4 (Gpc4) transcripts during gastrulation and neurulation suggests functions in early development of the central nervous system. We have functionally analysed the role of Xenopus Gpc4 by using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides and show that Gpc4 is part of the signalling network that patterns the forebrain. Depletion of GPC4 protein results in a pleiotropic phenotype affecting both primary axis formation and early patterning of the anterior central nervous system. Molecular analysis shows that posterior axis elongation during gastrulation is affected in GPC4-depleted embryos, whereas head and neural induction are apparently normal. During neurulation, loss of GPC4 disrupts expression of dorsal forebrain genes, such as Emx2, whereas genes marking the ventral forebrain and posterior central nervous system continue to be expressed. This loss of GPC4 activity also causes apoptosis of forebrain progenitors during neural tube closure. Biochemical studies establish that GPC4 binds FGF2 and modulates FGF signal transduction. Inhibition of FGF signal transduction, by adding the chemical SU5402 to embryos from neural plate stages onwards, phenocopies the loss of gene expression and apoptosis in the forebrain. We propose that GPC4 regulates dorsoventral forebrain patterning by positive modulation of FGF signalling.

Animals↗