Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PERSONALITY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,189 records · Page 66Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Comorbid personality impairment in body dysmorphic disorder.

Personality impairment was evaluated in 17 body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) patients undergoing a treatment study of clomipramine versus desipramine. Semistructured interviews were administered using both categorical (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM [SCID II]) and dimensional (Dimensional Assessment of Personality Impairment [DAPI]) methods. Personality measures were also correlated with a range of clinical variables (severity of BDD and depressive symptoms, age, duration of illness, and response to treatment). A secondary aim of the study was to provide preliminary validation for the DAPI. Consistent with previous studies, BDD patients showed considerable personality pathology. By SCID II, patients met criteria for a mean of 2.53 personality disorder diagnoses; 87% of patients met criteria for at least 1 diagnosis and 53% for more than 1. Cluster C diagnoses were the most common. Mean scores for the DAPI were 2.63 (3 = mild impairment) to 6.41 (7 = severe impairment), averaging 5.26 (5 = moderate). With regard to the DAPI, the results provided preliminary evidence of good reliability and validity. Moreover, both personality measures were highly intercorrelated. Although SCID II diagnoses correlated with baseline depression (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD]) scores, there were few other significant correlations between personality and other clinical variables. Of note, however, treatment responders demonstrated less personality impairment than nonresponders. The finding that personality measures were highly intercorrelated but, on the whole, not well correlated with other clinical measures supports the distinct and dissociable nature of personality phenomena in BDD. Despite the small sample size, these results suggest that personality impairment appears to be significant factor in BDD and may even play a role in treatment response.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Stability and predictive value of self-report personality traits pre- and post-electroconvulsive therapy: a preliminary study.

The accuracy and value of personality assessment for depressed patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an underexplored and controversial area. However, there are data suggesting that personality traits and personality disorders affect the ultimate outcome of depressed patients receiving a variety of somatic treatments including ECT. Despite these data, controversy continues regarding the advisability of evaluating personality functioning in patients with severe depression. This study sought to explore the stability and predictive value of self-reported personality traits in depressed patients undergoing ECT. Sixteen subjects completed a self-report test of personality functioning and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) before and after ECT treatment. The results showed that the majority of self-report personality traits were stable pre- and post-ECT treatment. However, major depressive disorder did significantly affect the report of avoidant, histrionic, aggressive-sadistic, and schizotypal personality traits. Treatment did not change the overall personality profile of these subjects. Furthermore, regression analysis controlling for pretreatment depression showed pretreatment borderline personality traits to be significantly related to the posttreatment depression scores (response to treatment). These findings suggest that routine administration of a standard self-report measure of personality may aid in the evaluation of and treatment planning for patients receiving ECT.

Depressive Disorder↗
PubMed2002

Alcoholism and personality.

OBJECTIVE: The search for an alcoholic personality has been pursued with varying enthusiasm throughout the 20th century. This paper reviews the methodological issues, research designs and current theories relating alcoholism and personality. METHOD: A selected literature search using computerised databases was ordered via the four major research design strategies: cross sectional studies, high-risk studies, longitudinal studies and genetic epidemiology studies. RESULTS: Cross sectional studies have suggested that two broad bands of personality, impulsivity/novelty seeking and neuroticism/negative emotionality, are associated with alcoholism. Although high-risk studies have repeatedly shown that sons of male alcoholics are at increased risk of alcoholism, whether this risk is related to personality variables is unclear. Many authors believe that the presence of antisocial personality disorder is a confounder and that this may explain some of the contradictory findings. Longitudinal studies have consistently reported that antisocial behaviour and hyperactivity are related to later alcoholism. Negative emotionality seems to be less important and may largely be a consequence of the alcoholism itself. Genetic epidemiological studies suggest that personality measures play a modest but significant role in the genetic influence of alcoholism. The strongest relationships are with conduct disorder and antisocial behaviour. The postulated alcoholic subtypes (Type I, Type II or Type A/B) based on age of onset and personality style have been challenged by recent research. The most vulnerable to alcoholism may be those with both high impulsivity/high novelty seeking and high neuroticism/negative emotionality. CONCLUSION: Antisocial behaviour and hyperactivity are the most consistent behaviours associated with alcoholism. These behaviours are not specific for alcoholism and are associated with many other psychiatric conditions. Personality variables by themselves explain only a small proportion of the risk for alcohol dependence. There is no alcoholic personality nor are there personality measures which are specific to vulnerability to later alcohol dependence. Attempting to link alcoholism with theoretical, poorly validated models of personality is premature.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed2004

Persistent social dysfunction in anxious and depressed patients with personality disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term social function of psychiatric patients with anxiety and depressive disorders and to relate this to personality status and other factors. METHOD: A cohort of 210 patients (mean age 35 years) with dysthymic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder diagnosed using a structured interview (SCID) were assessed at baseline for personality status using the Personality Assessment Schedule (PAS) and ratings of anxiety and depression. Exactly 12 years later social function was assessed using the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) and personality reassessed with the PAS by a rater blind to initial personality status. Individual social function items were examined in those with and without personality disorders. RESULTS: Social function was significantly better in those with little or no baseline personality disturbance (P < 0.001) and the domains of close relationships, stress in completing tasks, use of spare time and family relationships showed the largest personality differences. A multiple linear regression model showed that self-rated depression scores, single marital status and personality status were the main baseline variables predicting social function at 12 years. CONCLUSION: Although personality characteristics may change over time social dysfunction persists and persistent social dysfunction in mental state disorders may be a strong indicator of personality disturbance rather than an indicator of treatment resistance.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Personality disorders and medical comorbidity.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Personality disorders are not usually thought of as being associated with medical comorbidity. Research shows that medical comorbidity in personality disorders is clinically important. RECENT FINDINGS: In general those with personality disorders do not feel as fit as others do. Also, those with personality disorders in addition to other psychiatric disorders, such as depression and antisocial personality disorder, are likely to have more health problems than those without personality disorders. People with active borderline personality disorder have been shown to have more medical problems than those with remitted borderline personality disorder. Personality disorders can complicate the course of chronic medical illnesses. Finally, the use of psychotropic medications is not unusual in personality disorders and in itself can be associated with medical illnesses. SUMMARY: Clinicians caring for people with personality disorders need to be aware of possible medical comorbidity. More research is needed.

Borderline Personality Disorder↗
PubMed2004

Relationship between Type A and B personality and debrisoquine hydroxylation capacity.

AIM: A person with Type A personality is an 'aggressor' compared with the rarely harried Type B. Although debrisoquine hydroxylase (CYP2D6) capacity has been associated with personality, no study has specifically investigated its association with personality Type A and B. Therefore the aim of this research was to study the impact of CYP2D6 on Type A and B personality. METHODS: Type A and B personality questionnaires were administered to 48 healthy patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. After obtaining informed consent, patients were genotyped for the various CYP2D6 alleles by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. Based on the genotypes, patients were grouped as extensive metabolizer (EM)1 (normal) (CYP2D6*1/*1), EM2 (intermediate) (CYP2D6*1/*4, CYP2D6*1/*5, CYP2D6*1/*9 and CYP2D6*1/*10) and EM3 (slow) (CYP2D6*4/*10, CYP2D6*5/*10, CYP2D6*10/*10 and CYP2D6*10/*17). Chi(2) was used to determine the relationship between the groups and personality types. RESULTS: The percentages of patients who were of the EM1, EM2 and EM3 groups were 20.8%, 52.1% and 27.1%, respectively. There was a significant difference (P = 0.032) between the three groups in terms of personality type, in which EM1 showed a tendency to be of personality Type A while EM2 and EM3 tended to be of personality Type B. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that there is a relationship between CYP2D6 activity and Type A and B personality.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Transcription factor AP-2beta genotype associated with anxiety-related personality traits in women. A replication study.

Attempts to link transmitter system genes to certain aspects of personality have been performed. Several monoamine-related gene variants have been investigated. We previously reported an association between a transcription factor activating protein-2beta (AP-2beta) variant and anxiety-related personality traits as estimated by Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP). To confirm this reported association, we have, in the present study, analysed an enlarged group of healthy volunteers (n = 370) with regard to AP-2beta genotype and personality traits. For estimation of personality traits, individuals completed 5 different personality questionnaires, i.e. Swedish Universities Scales of Personality (SSP), Health-Relevant 5- Factor Personality Inventory (HP5i), Temperament and Character Inventory, the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and KSP. In contrast to men, women having two long AP-2beta alleles displayed lower scores for muscular tension (KSP; F = 10.65, p = 0.0013), somatic trait anxiety (SSP; F = 7.18, p = 0.0081), trait irritability (SSP; F = 4.51, p = 0.032), mistrust (SSP; F = 4.01, p = 0.0468) and negative affectivity (HP5i; F = 10.20, p = 0.0017) than women with at least one short allele. The data presented in this study, together with our previously published data, suggest that AP-2beta intron 2 genotype is associated with low levels of anxiety-related personality traits in women. Hence, these data further suggest the human AP-2beta gene as a novel candidate gene in personality.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Relationship between hypomania and personality disorders before and after successful treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of hypomanic states on maladaptive personality traits and personality disorders, the authors evaluated personality traits and disorders of patients during an episode of hypomania and after successful somatic treatment. METHOD: The authors used the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders to study 66 outpatients who had a lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder and who met the minimum Research Diagnostic Criteria for hypomania. All patients had a knowledgeable informant separately undergo the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders during the patient's hypomanic state. Outpatients who successfully recovered from the hypomanic episode (N = 47) and their informants were read-ministered the interview 4-8 weeks after the initial assessment. RESULTS: During the hypomanic state, informants generally reported higher levels of maladaptive personality traits among patients than patients themselves. For the patients who recovered successfully from the hypomanic episode, a reduction in all maladaptive personality traits except schizoid and dependent traits was reported by both patients and their informants; however, the decrease reported by patients generally was much greater than that reported by informants. In addition, schizoid traits actually increased after successful treatment according to patient reports but were unchanged according to informant reports. CONCLUSIONS: Hypomania may be associated with an exacerbation of maladaptive personality traits, which may be attenuated after successful treatment. Even with the attainment of euthymic mood, however, about 50% of the cohort had at least one personality disorder, which suggests that a high degree of comorbidity may exist between bipolar disorders and maladaptive personality traits or personality disorders.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Differences between clinical and research practices in diagnosing borderline personality disorder.

OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that clinicians are less inclined than researchers to use direct questions in ascertaining the presence of personality disorders, and questions have been raised about the validity of research on personality disorders in which diagnoses are based on semistructured diagnostic interviews. This study examined the influence of assessment method on the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. METHOD: Diagnoses of borderline personality disorder derived from structured and unstructured clinical interviews were compared in two groups of psychiatric outpatients seen in the same practice setting. Five hundred individuals presenting to a general adult psychiatric practice for an intake appointment underwent a routine unstructured clinical interview. After the completion of that study, the method of conducting diagnostic evaluations was changed, and 409 individuals were interviewed with the borderline personality disorder section of the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. RESULTS: Individuals in the structured interview group were significantly more often diagnosed with borderline personality disorder than individuals in the clinical group. When information from the structured interview was presented to the clinicians, borderline personality disorder was much more likely to be diagnosed by them. CONCLUSIONS: The method used to assess borderline personality disorder has a great impact on the frequency with which it is diagnosed. Without the benefit of detailed information from a semistructured diagnostic interview, clinicians rarely diagnose the disorder during a routine intake evaluation. Providing the results of a semistructured interview to clinicians prompts them to diagnose borderline personality disorder much more frequently. This is inconsistent with the notion that personality disorder diagnoses based on semistructured interviews are not viewed as valid by clinicians.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Axis II comorbidity of substance use disorders among patients referred for treatment of personality disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of comorbid substance use disorders in patients referred for treatment of personality disorders. METHOD: Two hundred inpatients and outpatients were assessed by semistructured interviews for substance use and personality disorders. Univariate odds ratios were calculated for groups of substance use disorders and each DSM-III-R axis II disorder; comorbidity among axis II disorders was controlled in multivariate models predicting current or lifetime substance use disorder groups. The impact of personality disorder on chronicity and overall impairment associated with substance use disorders was evaluated. RESULTS: Close to 60% of subjects with substance use disorders had personality disorders. Borderline personality disorder was significantly associated with current substance use disorders, excluding alcohol and cannabis, and with lifetime alcohol, stimulant, and other substance use disorders, excluding cannabis. Antisocial personality disorder was associated with lifetime substance use disorders other than alcohol, cannabis, and stimulants. These relationships remained significant after controlling for the presence of all other personality disorders. There was no evidence that personality disorders increased the chronicity of substance use disorders, but comorbid personality disorders were associated with greater global impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Borderline personality disorder may be associated with a wide variety of substance use disorders, especially among patients seeking treatment for personality problems.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Ten-year stability of depressive personality disorder in depressed outpatients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term stability of depressive personality disorder. METHOD: The subjects included 142 outpatients with axis I depressive disorders at study entry; 73 had depressive personality disorder. The patients were assessed by using semistructured diagnostic interviews at baseline and in four follow-up evaluations at 2.5-year intervals over 10.0 years. Follow-up data were available for 127 (89.4%) of the patients. RESULTS: The 10.0-year stability of the diagnoses of depressive personality disorder was fair, and the rate of depressive personality disorder declined over time. The dimensional score was moderately stable over 10.0 years. Growth curve analyses revealed a sharp decline in the level of depressive personality disorder traits between the baseline and 2.5-year assessments, followed by a gradual linear decrease. Reductions in depressive personality disorder traits were associated with remission of the axis I depressive disorders. Finally, depressive personality disorder at baseline predicted the trajectory of depressive symptoms over time in patients with dysthymic disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive personality disorder is moderately stable, particularly when assessed with a dimensional approach. However, the diagnosis rate and traits of depressive personality disorder tend to decline over time. The degree of stability for depressive personality disorder is comparable to that for the axis II disorders in the main text of DSM-IV. Finally, depressive personality disorder has prognostic implications for the course of axis I mood disorders, such as dysthymic disorder.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder.

BACKGROUND: The evidence suggests that personality traits are hierarchically organized with more specific or lower-order traits combining to form more generalized higher-order traits. Agreement exists across studies regarding the lower-order traits that delineate personality disorder but not the higher-order traits. This study seeks to identify the higher-order structure of personality disorder by examining the phenotypic and genetic structures underlying lower-order traits. METHODS: Eighteen lower-order traits were assessed using the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Disorder-Basic Questionnaire in samples of 656 personality disordered patients, 939 general population subjects, and a volunteer sample of 686 twin pairs. RESULTS: Principal components analysis yielded 4 components, labeled Emotional Dysregulation, Dissocial Behavior, Inhibitedness, and Compulsivity, that were similar across the 3 samples. Multivariate genetic analyses also yielded 4 genetic and environmental factors that were remarkably similar to the phenotypic factors. Analysis of the residual heritability of the lower-order traits when the effects of the higher-order factors were removed revealed a substantial residual heritable component for 12 of the 18 traits. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the following conclusions. First, the stable structure of traits across clinical and nonclinical samples is consistent with dimensional representations of personality disorders. Second, the higher-order traits of personality disorder strongly resemble dimensions of normal personality. This implies that a dimensional classification should be compatible with normative personality. Third, the residual heritability of the lower-order traits suggests that the personality phenotypes are based on a large number of specific genetic components.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Gender differences in personality disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess gender differences in personality disorders. Since heterogeneity of axis I diagnoses could introduce variability in the assessment of axis II diagnoses, the authors studied a group of patients with a primary diagnosis of major depression. METHOD: A total of 316 patients were evaluated with the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire--Revised, a self-rating measure, or the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II), a clinician-rated instrument, or both. Axis II disorders were assessed with the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire--Revised for 288 patients with major depression. The SCID-II was administered to 117 subjects, with an additional 95 subjects receiving the SCID-II for cluster B diagnoses only. RESULTS: The mean 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores for 108 men (mean age = 39.28 years) and 208 women (mean age = 39.11) were 19.0 (SD = 3.8) and 19.6 (SD = 6.9), respectively. Men were significantly more likely than women to meet criteria for narcissistic, antisocial, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders as measured by the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire--Revised and for narcissistic and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders as measured by the SCID-II. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with those of previous studies showing a greater prevalence of antisocial and narcissistic personality disorders in men. In contrast with other investigations, however, neither the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire--Revised nor the SCID-II revealed a higher prevalence of any personality disorder in women.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Personality disorders among difficult patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between "difficult" patient status and personality disorder. DESIGN: A survey using the Diagnostic Interview for Personality Disorders. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one patients nominated by 9 family medicine providers who subjectively experienced their care as difficult and 22 control subjects systematically selected from the same practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The presence of personality disorder measured by the Diagnostic Interview for Personality Disorders. RESULTS: Personality disorders were more prevalent among the difficult patients: 7 of 21 difficult patients and 1 of 22 control subjects had at least 1 personality disorder (P = .02). Five of 7 difficult patients had dependent personality disorder. None of the providers realized that the difficult patients had personality disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized personality disorder can make difficult provider-patient relationships more likely. Dependent personality disorder may be especially difficult. Improved physician awareness of personality disorders may lead to more effective understanding and treatment of some difficult patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Personality disorders and depression: comorbidity.

Depression and comorbid personality disorders relate to one another in three distinct ways: 1) personality disorders may precede the development of depression and render an individual vulnerable to depression; 2) depression may precede the personality disorder and foster the development of the personality disorder; 3) there may be an interface between personality disorders and depression, which has been deemed depressive personality disorder. This article reviews data on the comorbidity of depression, particularly chronic depression, and personality disorders. This article also reviews data on the effect of comorbid personality disorders on treatment for depression, and the effect that treatment for depression has on personality disorders. Comorbid personality disorders generally do not impede treatment for depression. Successful treatment for depression is associated with improvement in personality disorders.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed1999

Defense mechanisms and personality in depression.

There is a longstanding belief that personality represents a structure that is stable over time, and changes, if at all, very slowly. Nonetheless, clinical and empirical evidence suggests that in patients with some Axis I disorders, the rate of personality disorders using DSM criteria decreases after treatment, suggesting that personality as assessed by phenomenological systems is state-dependent. An alternative to the DSM phenomenological system of conceptualizing personality is the dynamic concept of character, that is, a predictable pattern of both adaptive and pathological defense mechanisms, and personality organization comprised of object relations, ego strengths, and superego development. Data from this study address the hypothesis that defense mechanisms and personality organization remain relatively stable in patients treated for Axis I disorders, irrespective of clinical improvement. Patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) entered randomized, controlled medication trials. Defensive functioning was evaluated with the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) [Bond et al., 1983: Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:333-338], and personality organization was assessed with the Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO; Clarkin et al., unpublished), both at baseline and at the completion of the clinical trial. Data were analyzed for whether an individual's pattern of defense mechanisms and personality organization were stable over time regardless of response to treatment of MDD. The question was also asked whether a predominant pattern of defense mechanisms or level of personality organization predicts response to treatment or dropout rate. Among treatment responders, nonresponders and drop-outs, baseline DSQ scores were similar except for "image-distorting" defenses, which were significantly more prevalent among drop-outs compared to responders (P = .016). Post-treatment DSQ values revealed a significant decrease in "maladaptive" defenses (P = .01) in the entire sample, while intermediate and "adaptive" defenses remained unchanged. This same pattern was found to hold true in treatment responders. When comparing treatment responders and nonresponders at the end of the trial, medication responders used significantly less "maladaptive" defenses than did nonresponders (P = .003), and had a significantly higher, or healthier level of "overall defensive functioning" (P = .04). Baseline and post-treatment IPO values did not show significant differences. Results of the study address the question of whether there are personality characteristics that are enduring and that can be appreciated irrespective of an Axis I disorder.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Dysfunctional attitudes and personality disorder comorbidity during long-term treatment of MDD.

A key component of how depression may impact personality pathology involves an understanding of how cognition and dysfunctional attitudes may change as a result of experiencing a depressive state, and how these changes may affect reporting of personality disorder symptoms. This study examines whether dysfunctional attitudes are related to the stability of personality disorder diagnoses. The sample comprised 64 outpatients who were treatment responders following an 8-week acute treatment phase for major depressive disorder (MDD), met criteria for remission throughout a 26-week continuation phase, and completed a personality disorder assessment Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis II Disorders (SCID-II) at the beginning and end of each treatment phase. The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS) was given to patients at the beginning of the continuation phase. We found that following successful treatment of the MDD, individuals with stable personality disorder diagnoses (e.g., meeting criteria for a personality disorder at both the beginning and endpoint of continuation treatment) had greater severity of dysfunctional attitudes (P =.001) at the beginning of the continuation treatment compared to those who never met criteria for a personality disorder during continuation treatment. Though there was no significant relationship between DAS scores and the stability of a Cluster A or Cluster B personality disorder diagnosis, there was a significant relationship between DAS scores and the stability of a Cluster C personality disorder diagnosis (P <.001). Outpatients who had a stable Cluster C personality disorder diagnosis had higher scores on the DAS at the beginning of continuation treatment compared to outpatients who never met criteria for a Cluster C diagnosis. This finding suggests that dysfunctional attitudes that persist beyond remission of MDD may be a marker for certain personality disorders that are stable across long-term treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Deep-feeling development gives autistics abstractions: when a young person has no abstractions, his or her thoughts or behaviors frequently seem autistic.

The heart of autism is existence by oneself. It is being, talking and acting by oneself. Talking by oneself is not talking to oneself but talking at others. Its purpose is not exchanging or hearing words. Its purpose is sending words to another person. If being completely by themselves is autistics' experience of their existence, then they may have no need for language. And there is no language development in about half of all autistics. For autistics who do have language, if they are mostly sending out words and are only sometimes exchanging or hearing words, then another person's language has little or no effect on them. Without language from outside persons as a guide, autistics' language becomes strange and free from the normal body motions (gestures) that come with language. So strange language and uncommon body motions with that language are two of autism's chief signs. Autistics are unnerved by change. So they keep their behaviors in a narrow range and do them over and over with no connection to other persons' purposes. A narrow range of behaviors done over and over for no seeming purpose is another chief sign of autism. Because young boys and girls get to being, talking and acting by themselves when they come down with autism, they no longer seem to have any idea of what is going on between themselves and other persons. So when boys and girls get autism, they frequently do or say strange and surprising things with other persons. The knowledge of what to do and say with other persons comes as abstractions. This paper's one hypothesis is that autistic persons have no abstractions because the development of their deep feelings has not gone far enough to let abstractions come into existence. By acting or talking without the support of abstractions, autistic persons have a hard time with language, learning, living and loving in relation to other persons or to society. Autism comes from stopping the development of a baby's deep feelings within the first six months after birth. The development of deep feelings may be started again by a special operation named deep-feeling contact. (Body-to-body touching is never necessary for making deep-feeling contact.) As the development of his or her deep feelings goes forward, the autistic person's abstractions come into existence. Then language, learning, living and loving become much simpler for him or her.

Autistic Disorder↗