Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Osteogenesis, Distraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,189 records · Page 66Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Skeletal stability after correction of maxillary hypoplasia by the Glasgow extra-oral distraction (GED) device.

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis delivers excellent results, particularly in patients with clefts. In the past, devices such as the conventional facemask and the rigid external distraction device have been used to correct maxillary hypoplasia after a Le Fort I osteotomy. We describe a new device, the Glasgow extra-oral distraction device. The extent of skeletal and dental stability of corrections achieved in 10 patients with maxillary hypoplasia associated with clefts was satisfactory. This device costs little, can be produced in developing countries, and provides effective treatment for severe secondary deformity associated with clefts.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.

PURPOSE: Long treatment protocols currently limit the application of distraction osteogenesis (DO). The purpose of this study was to develop a porcine model for DO and to define the effects of latency and distraction rate on bone formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Distractors were placed through submandibular incisions. For analysis of latency, mandibular osteotomies were distracted after 0 (n = 3) or 4 (n = 2) days at a rate of 1 mm/d (7 days) with 14 days fixation. For analysis of rate, osteotomies were distracted at 1 mm (n = 4), 2 mm (n = 4), or 4 mm (n = 4) per day to produce a 12-mm gap with 24 days fixation. DO wounds were assessed in vivo with bimanual palpation to detect mobility across the gap. Harvested specimens were evaluated by gross appearance and bimanual palpation. Standardized radiographic techniques were used to estimate bone density. RESULTS: During DO, animals showed normal activity. There were no infections, and no distractors were removed prematurely. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the groups that underwent distraction after 0- or 4-day latency showed equivalent healing. In the comparison of distraction rates, stability was greatest in the group distracted at 1 mm/d. CONCLUSIONS: A porcine model for mandibular DO has been developed in which mandibular lengthening was successfully performed without latency and at a rate of 1 mm/d. The relationships among latency, gap size, rate, and duration of fixation are poorly understood and can be defined with relevant animal models.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Maxillary distraction for the management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia with a rigid external distraction system.

Maxillary hypoplasia is a common finding in patients with repaired orofacial clefts. Management of this condition has been a challenge to the reconstructive team. The introduction of distraction osteogenesis to treat craniofacial skeletal dysplasias has opened alternative approaches to manage these severe conditions. In this article, the authors present their technique to distract the hypoplastic cleft maxilla using a rigid external distraction device. The clinical assessment, indications, orthodontic procedure, surgical technique, and distraction protocol are reviewed. A case report shows the use of the technique. This technique allows the reconstructive team to treat patients in all age groups with predictable and stable results.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Vertical distraction of a free vascularized fibula flap in a reconstructed hemimandible: case report.

The authors report a case of vertical distraction osteogenesis of a free revascularized fibula flap used to reconstruct an hemimandible lost as a result of a gunshot injury. The reconstruction procedure and the distraction protocol are described; clinical and radiological results are presented. The vertical discrepancy between the fibula and the native right hemimandible was corrected.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Distraction in mouth, jaw and facial surgery].

Distraction osteogenesis is established worldwide as a new surgical technique. The former rule, not to osteotomize before the end of bone growth, is no longer valid. Today, distraction starts as early as infancy as well as in childhood and adolescence. This new method allows the gain of bone in the distraction gap so that bone grafting can be avoided. Distraction is indicated in hemifacial microsomias, multiple syndromes with mandibular malformations, mandibular retrognathia, posttraumatic jaw deficiencies, craniofacial malformations, alveolar ridge resorptions, and alveolar ridge resections. Distraction surgery started in the mandible and was continued in the maxilla and the craniofacial region. Alveolar ridge distraction followed. After using extraoral devices, the development of internal applicable distractors followed. Today, bi- or tridirectional internal devices are already available. The whole treatment concept includes the orthodontist. Distraction planning before surgery is of great importance. The literature presently includes methods, indications, and case reports but only few results, which we compare with our experiences.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Respiratory outcome of mid-face advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.

Upper airway stenosis in patients with faciocraniosynostosis is very common and often severe. Mid-face advancement, either with a Le Fort III or concomitantly to a monobloc frontofacial advancement, may prevent a tracheotomy or result in its ablation. The amelioration of respiratory function appears to be much better if the mid-face advancement is combined with distraction osteogenesis, although large studies with long-term follow-up are rare. In this study we reviewed the respiratory outcome between Le Fort III with distraction and monobloc advancement with distraction in 55 faciocraniosynostotic patients. Early respiratory results of both procedures were very good and stable at long-term follow-up. The choice between a Le Fort III and a monobloc procedure is made based on presenting morphology, previous surgery, and age. Both can be expected to give a long-lasting improvement of upper airway obstruction.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.

Upper airway stenosis in patients with faciocraniosynostosis is very common and often severe. Midface advancement, either with a Le Fort III or concomitantly to a monobloc frontofacial advancement, may prevent a tracheotomy or result in its ablation. The amelioration of respiratory function appears to be much better if the midface advancement is combined with distraction osteogenesis, although large studies with long-term follow-up are rare. In this study, we reviewed the respiratory outcome between Le Fort III with distraction and monobloc advancement with distraction in 54 faciocraniosynostotic patients. Early respiratory results of both procedures were very good and stable at long-term follow-up. The choice between a Le Fort III and a monobloc procedure is made on the basis of presenting morphology, previous surgery, and age. Both can be expected to give a long-lasting improvement of upper airway obstruction.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed2002

Correction of a deformed thumb by distraction of the phalanx.

We used distraction osteogenesis to correct six deformed thumbs in four patients ranging in age from 4 to 7 years. Two of the patients had Apert syndrome (syndromic craniosynostosis with symmetrical syndactyly) and two had polydactyly. We used a small fixator with a ball joint and successfully corrected the angular deformity after lengthening the proximal phalanx by distraction. This single inclusive procedure was extremely useful. We found the optimal distraction regimen for the digital phalanx was a one day waiting period and lengthening at 1 mm/day. The mean healing indexes were 37.2 days/cm (range 24.2 to 41.5) in those with Apert syndrome and 64.3 days/cm in those with polydactyly (62.5 and 66.0). Our results suggest that osteogenesis at the distraction site may be quicker in patients with Apert syndrome than in those with polydactyly.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed2000

A submerged osteodistraction device: an innovative technique for experimental animal studies.

The author presents a submerged mandibular distraction device that can be used in the rabbit mandible for additional experimental studies of the distraction osteogenesis process. A distractor to suit the rabbit mandible was designed by the author. It is fixed to the mandible under layers of skin and mucoperiosteum. It can distract both sides of the mandible simultaneously without the need for two separate devices. The body of the distractor is 1.5 x 1.0 cm, and the total length is 3 cm. It weighs 2 g.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Distraction lengthening of the mandibular costochondral graft: a precautionary note.

Distraction osteogenesis of bone-grafted mandibles has been shown to occur without undue difficulties in bone regeneration and healing. In the patient with hemifacial microsomia for which early costochondral graft reconstruction has been done, secondary distraction lengthening may still be needed eventually. It is important to assess preoperatively that the superior portion of the graft is properly positioned against the residual glenoid fossa to prevent excessive superior movement of the proximal mandibular segment during distraction. The case presented clearly illustrates this unique distraction phenomenon.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Chronic ethanol exposure is associated with a local increase in TNF-alpha and decreased proliferation in the rat distraction gap.

Chronic alcohol consumption is a risk factor for osteoporosis and inhibits osseous repair and regeneration. We investigated the hypothesis that chronic ethanol exposure induces the expression of TNF-alpha and/or IL-1beta and inhibits proliferation during distraction osteogenesis (DO). Following six weeks of liquid diet infusion (+/-ethanol) and 14 days of DO, the expression of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta in the distraction gap and contralateral femoral marrow of adult male rats was examined by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR, respectively. In the bone marrow, the expression of both TNF-alpha and IL-1beta mRNA was significantly increased by ethanol (p<0.04 for both). In the DO gap, ethanol exposure increased the expression of TNF-alpha in both the fibrous interzone and primary matrix front (PMF), while IL-1beta expression was not significantly affected in either region. A negative correlation was found between the percentage of PCNA+ and TNF+ cells in the PMF (p<0.015, R(2)=0.655). Incubation of MC3T3-E1 cells with ethanol for 24 or 48 h produced a time and dose dependent two- to fourfold increase in TNF-alpha transcripts as measured by RT-PCR, demonstrating that ethanol can directly induce TNF-alpha expression in osteoblast-like cells. These results support the hypothesis that attenuation of bone formation by ethanol may be mediated, in part, by local increases in TNF-alpha during osteogenesis.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed2006

[Distractios osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery].

For more than one decade the extremity surgery already used distraction osteogenesis. This new therapy in the region of the maxillofacial surgery (in the case of malformation of the maxilla and mandible) was adapted from the extremity surgeons. The authors summarized and classified the methods and history of the osteodistraction surgery based on literature. The indication fields, the used protocols and the most common distractor types are listed. The authors emphasized the multidisciplinary feature of the therapies, underlined the leading role of the orthodontist. With presenting their own two mandible distraction case reports they introduced the practical use of the distractors while using intra- and extraoral devices. They also emphasized the difficulties and failure opportunities. Their aim was to make suggestions for the further development of this method in our country.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Maxillary distraction using a trans-sinusal distractor: technical note.

In this pilot study, the principle of distraction osteogenesis was used to advance the midface of a boxer dog. A modified high Le Fort I-type osteotomy was performed. Following a latency period of 5 days the maxilla was distracted 14 mm in 14 consecutive days at a rate of 1 mm per day. Ten weeks after the completion of the distraction, multiple biopsies were taken across the distraction gap. Histological observation showed bone deposition in the osteotomy sites. Soft and hard tissue formation resulted in complete healing across the distraction gap. The maxillary sinus was used to accommodate the distraction device. Superimposition of the standardized lateral cephalograms taken at the end of distraction and 14 months after the removal of the distractors showed no sign of relapse in the achieved sagittal advancement of the maxilla. This small, intraoral trans-sinusal placed distractor has a completely new conceptual design, and may be helpful in distraction of maxilla in children and adults with midfacial hypoplasia.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible. Part III: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and horizontal (mediolateral) movements.

Distraction osteogenesis has proven to be an effective technique for the correction of mandibular deficiencies. However, problems have been encountered in achieving a final, idealized form of the mandible when using distraction devices capable of moving the bone segments in only one dimension (uniplanar). Specifically, occlusal irregularities and deficiencies in lower facial contour have been seen following uniplanar distraction. To address these problems, a distraction device capable of independent movements in three planes (multiplanar) was developed. Previously reported studies in a canine model have demonstrated that this device can successfully distract the mandible along both the sagittal axis (anteroposterior or z-axis) and the vertical axis (superoinferior or y-axis). This study examines the ability of the multiplanar device to distract along the sagittal and horizontal axes (mediolateral or x-axis). A total of 12 dogs were included in the study. All animals underwent unilateral or bilateral mandibular distraction using an external multiplanar device. After a latency period of 5 days, primary distraction along the anteroposterior axis at a rate of 1 mm/day for 10 days (10 mm total) was performed. During the following 10 days, along with an additional 11 mm to 20 mm of anteroposterior axis distraction, concomitant secondary distraction was performed along the horizontal (mediolateral) axis at a rate of 5 degrees/day (50 degrees total). Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at the conclusion of both anteroposterior and combined anteroposterior-mediolateral distraction. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained preoperatively and at the end of consolidation (28 days), after which all animals were sacrificed and the dry skulls examined. In all animals, distraction along the mediolateral or x-axis was found to change the anteroposterior projection of the mandible. Varus angulation of the device with respect to the midline of the mandible caused compression of the distracted segments and reduced the anteroposterior thrust of the mandible. In contrast, valgus positioning of the device, with respect to the midline of the mandible, created the opposite effect, increasing the distracted length in the anteroposterior direction. The bone (mandibular) segments being distracted assumed the orientation of the device only for valgus positioning of the device (producing a decrease in the bigonial distance). Conversely, there was no effect from the mediolateral angulation on the distracted segments during varus positioning of the device. A possible explanation for this finding may be a greater resistance to an increase in the bigonial distance (varus positioning of the device) posed by obstruction of lateral movement of the condyle. This stands in contrast to a decrease in the bigonial distance observed following valgus positioning of the device. These findings confirm the clinical impression that distraction along the anteroposterior or sagittal axis remains the critical or keystone therapeutic maneuver in distraction of the mandible. Mediolateral or horizontal axis distraction is best used only as a supplementary movement; in essence, it only affects the anteroposterior dimension with little impact on clinically relevant changes to the bigonial distance.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Volumetric assessment of the distracted human mandible.

The mandibles of five patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral distraction osteogenesis were analyzed using computed tomography scans. The mandibles were reconstructed in three dimensions using General Electric computed tomography software. The total volume of each hemimandible was determined before and after distraction and compared. The mandibles were then segmented at 1-cm intervals, and the volumes of the segments were determined. The volumes of the mandibular segments before and after distraction were compared to determine the distribution of new bone through the mandible and the quantity of bone generated by distraction. The distracted hemimandibles increased in total volume by an average of 19.9% (statistically significant by the Student paired t test; P < 0.0001), whereas the nondistracted hemimandibles increased in total volume by an average of 5.2%. The segmental volumes of the distracted mandible were of similar or greater volume when compared to the preoperative mandibular segments. In addition, the distribution of regenerate bone mirrored the physiological distribution of the preoperative mandibular bone. This study indicates that distraction not only creates new bone but distributes that bone through the remodeled mandible in an anatomical pattern similar to that of the preoperative bone.

Bone Density↗
PubMed1999

Monobloc and facial bipartition distraction with internal devices.

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) permits gradual lengthening of the craniofacial skeleton. With the advent of new internal devices, monobloc (M) and facial bipartition (FB) DO are feasible. The rationale behind M and FB distraction is (1) gradual advancement of the M segment is not associated with a substantial retrofrontal dead space; (2) because 5 to 7 days elapse prior to distraction, the nasofrontal opening, in theory, is allowed to remucosalize; (3) gradual expansion of the soft tissues takes advantage of skin creep, potentially limiting relapse; (4) the procedure appears to be less invasive with decreased blood loss and operative time, enabling its use in infants; (5) overdistraction may eliminate or reduce the frequency of subsequent procedures; and (6) the procedure may be combined with FB and skull vault remodeling to provide excellent results in more complex craniofacial dysostosis problems. Five children underwent M advancement (N = 3) and M with FB (N = 2) at 9 months to 5 years of age to correct functional abnormalities such as corneal exposure, increased intracranial pressure, and apnea, as well as severe craniofacial disfigurement. Each patient underwent from 22 to 30 mm of distraction with the Modular Internal Distraction (MID) system, developed by the first author (SRC). There was one infection late in the series along the DO cable track. There were no cases of epidural abscess. In conclusion, MDO, with and without FB, appears to be a safe and effective technique for transcranial frontofacial advancement. The morbidity of the procedure appears to be less than that of conventional M advancement.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed2004

From midface distraction to the "true monoblock".

In treating craniosynostosis, during the past 2 decades it has become accepted practice to perform fronto-orbital advancement and delay midfacial surgery. Corneal exposure,associated airway difficulties, and psychosocial problems remained untreated in these patients. Distraction osteogenesis assisted endoscopically offers an alternative treatment for patients with craniosynostosis, with the possibility of early midfacial surgery and simultaneous correction of the orbital-frontal deformity. The major benefit of gradual distraction is that it allows the surgeon to overcome the resistance of the overlying soft tissue envelope and offers the option of displacing the skeletal framework over greater distances, thus avoiding bone grafting. The technique also reduces morbidity and produces an improvement in form and function.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed1998

Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible, Part II: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and vertical (superoinferior) movements.

The application of distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery has significantly altered the treatment of congenital mandibular deficiencies. However, evaluation of results in both animal studies and clinical cases has revealed deficiencies, particularly in two areas. First, distraction using a uniplanar device in an anteroposterior direction can result in a persistent anterior open bite. Second, the lateralization of the distracted hemimandible was often limited, with insufficient incremental gain in the bigonial distance. To overcome these shortcomings, a multiplanar distraction device was developed and tested in the canine model. This report details canine studies addressing the first problem: combined anteroposterior or sagittal (z-axis) and superoinferior or vertical (y-axis) movements. Six dogs underwent bilateral mandibular distraction with an external (extraoral), multiplanar device and completed sagittal plus vertical distraction. Evaluation included clinical examination (facial form, jaw position, and occlusion), photography, cephalograms (posteroanterior, basilar, and lateral), three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions, and examination of dry skulls. The dogs averaged 18.5 mm (range, 15-20 mm) of sagittal distraction and 41.0 degrees (range, 21-50 degrees) of vertical distraction. Marked anterior open bites were produced after vertical distraction secondary to premature contact of the maxillary and mandibular molars. Distraction in the vertical direction also had the additive effect of increasing the sagittal gains by approximately 5% to 10%. In conclusion, a multiplanar distraction device (with the potential for distraction in three planes) was effective in increasing mandibular anteroposterior thrust (sagittal distraction) and also in creating an anterior open bite (vertical or superoinferior distraction). Vertical distraction probably requires bilateral osteotomies to obtain optimal results. The preliminary gains in sagittal length are modified (reduced or increased) after distraction in a second plane (vertical and horizontal). Specifically, vertical distraction in the inferior direction (creating an open bite) also leads to isolated increases in the anteroposterior plane. Conversely, vertical distraction in the superior direction (closing an open bite), as seen in a human malocclusion, may lead to isolated decreases in the anteroposterior plane, but this question remains to be investigated in the laboratory.

Animals↗