SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Defibrillators”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,189 records · Page 66Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Managing atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is accepted as the therapy of choice in preventing sudden cardiac death. Multiple studies, such as Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID), the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS), the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH), and the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT), have shown a substantial benefit in survival rates for patients treated with ICDs compared with antiarrhythmic drug treatment. The detection of spontaneous ventricular tachycardias (VT) is based primarily on the programmed heart rate for intervention of the device. Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) cause unnecessary therapy delivery in about 10-20% of patients with ICDs. ICD therapy needs to be improved to become more specific for VT detection, by implementing algorithms that discriminate between VTs and SVTs. The enhanced detection criteria in currently available ICD devices are able to decrease the rate of unnecessary therapy to < 5% of patients. Atrial tachyarrhythmias can be managed with programmable features of the device, antiarrhythmic drug treatment, and in rare cases, ablation procedures. Dual-chamber ICDs, requiring an additional atrial lead, are indicated in specific situations of slow VT and concurrent, continuous SVTs at very similar heart rates. Using all these options, SVTs can be managed to achieve an acceptably low incidence of unnecessary therapy delivery in < 5% of ICD patients.

Death, Sudden, Cardiac↗

PubMed1999

Experience with a single-pass, dual-electrode implantable atrial defibrillator lead for maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation.

The implantable atrial defibrillator is a new potential nonpharmacologic treatment for recurrent atrial fibrillation. The results of this study suggest that a simplified lead configuration, with a single-pass, dual-electrode atrial defibrillation lead can be used for both atrial fibrillation detection and defibrillation with an implantable atrial defibrillator.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Single-incision and single-element array electrode to lower the defibrillation threshold.

Occasional patients have excessive defibrillation energy requirements despite appropriate transvenous defibrillation lead position and the use of biphasic shocks. A single-element subcutaneous array electrode was implanted in 2 patients with a high defibrillation threshold. The array electrode was implanted through the same infraclavicular incision that was used for implantation of the transvenous lead. The defibrillation threshold decreased from 30 J to 15 J and from 24 J to 9 J with the subcutaneous array electrode.

Cardiomyopathy, Dilated↗

PubMed1998

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children: a single-institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have been infrequently used in children as therapy for resuscitated sudden death and syncope due to ventricular arrhythmias unresponsive to antiarrhythmics. METHODS: The medical records of 5 children with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had experienced syncope and 3 (60%) an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Underlying pathology included hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2, long QT syndrome in 2, and ventricular arrhythmia after remote repair of congenital heart disease in 1. Open thoracotomy with epicardial lead placement and transvenous endocardial approaches were used. RESULTS: There was no early or late mortality in the 5 pediatric patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. Postoperative complications occurred more frequently when open thoracotomy was used for placement. At mean follow-up of 34 months, 4 of the 5 (80%) have received shocks. CONCLUSIONS: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is a safe and reliable therapy for children with resuscitated sudden death and syncope due to ventricular tachycardia unresponsive to antiarrhythmics. Transvenous lead placement lowers morbidity and hospital length of stay.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Crinkling of epicardial defibrillator patches. A common and serious problem.

The durability and reliability of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator epicardial patch systems have not been reported. In 128 consecutive patients such systems manufactured by Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (St. Paul, Minn.) or Medtronic, Inc. (Minneapolis, Minn.) were implanted with 100% follow-up to investigate the rate of patch crinkling and its consequences. A total of 122 patients survived the operation (operative mortality, 6 patients: 4.7%). Ninety-four patients received Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. AICD patches and 28 received Medtronic PCD patches. Patients had chest x-ray studies every 3 to 6 months and function of the defibrillator was checked every 3 months. Late mortality occurred in 17 patients (13%) leaving a total of 105 long-term survivors (82%) to the present. Among 122 survivors, severe crinkling of the patches occurred in 48 patients--33 in the Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. AICD group (36%) and 15 in the PCD group (54%)--within 2 years of the implant. Crinkling of patches caused not only malfunction of the system, but also cardiac pain in three patients. Crinkling occurred as early as 2 months after implant and progressed throughout the period of observation. Fourteen patients later required implant of an additional transvenous defibrillator because of failure of the epicardial system. The percentage of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems needed was higher for the Medtronic group (28%) than for the Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. AICD group (6.3%). Both systems have shown an unacceptably high rate of patch crinkling that occurs in a relatively short time. There is no difference whether a thoracotomy or midline sternotomy is used or whether the patches are implanted intrapericardially or extrapericardially. The quest should continue for a better patch system design.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Consistent subcutaneous prepectoral implantation of a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) that can be placed in the prepectoral region rather than implanted in the abdominal wall. DESIGN: We report the experience of placement of this new ICD in the prepectoral region in 13 patients from Sept. 28, 1993, through Jan. 10, 1994, at the Mayo Clinic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients offered this new ICD underwent placement of transvenous defibrillation leads, and the pulse generator was placed in a pocket formed in the subcutaneous, prepectoral space. Testing ensured a defibrillation threshold of 24 J or less. RESULTS: In all 13 patients, the pulse generator could be placed in the subcutaneous, prepectoral space. In all except one patient, acceptable defibrillation thresholds were achieved by using lead systems placed totally transvenously. Only one patient required placement of a subcutaneous patch. All but two patients were dismissed from the hospital within 3 days after the ICD implantation. CONCLUSION: Consistent subcutaneous, prepectoral placement of this new ICD pulse generator is possible. Because the entire procedure can be performed in the pacemaker implantation room, the potential exists for decreasing the duration of the hospitalization and associated costs.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Psychological reactions and family adjustment in shock versus no shock groups after implantation of internal cardioverter defibrillator.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare psychological reactions and family adjustment after sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in survivors who did and did not experience defibrillatory shocks the first year of recovery. METHODS: Data were collected as part of a longitudinal prospective study that examined patient and family adjustment after SCA. SCA survivors and one family member per patient were interviewed and completed questionnaires three times within the first year (hospital discharge, 6 months, and 12 months) after SCA. SAMPLE: Fifteen SCA survivors (13 men and 2 women) between the ages of 30 and 74 (mean 57 years) and one respective family member, usually the spouse, (mean age 53 years) participated. All SCA survivors had had primary ventricular fibrillation outside the hospital, had automatic defibrillators implanted while hospitalized, and were monitored for 1 year. RESULTS: Participants were divided into shock and no shock groups based on activation of their ICD the first year. The mean number of shocks received in the shock group survivors was 26, with a range of 3 to 100. Anxiety, depression, anger, and stress levels were higher for both survivors and their family members in the group that received defibrillator shocks. Denial was high throughout the entire year in all survivors. Dyadic adjustment and family coping were not found to be significantly different between the no shock and shock groups. A trend toward reduction in family social support and dyadic satisfaction was noted in both groups with time. CONCLUSIONS: Both SCA survivors and their family members experience more psychological distress in the first year after ICD implantation if the defibrillator fires. Families in both shock and no shock groups report lower levels of family support and marital satisfaction the first year after SCA and ICD implantation.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed1998

[National Registry of Automatic Implantable Defibrillators in 1996].

The results of the Spanish Registry of Automatic Defibrillators implanted between February 1996 and January 1997 are reported. A questionnaire per patient was completed by every implanting physician, in every center. The questionnaire was designed by the Section of Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. The data from 306 automatic defibrillators implanted were reported. The percentage of defibrillators per inhabitant in Spain is close to 1 per 100,000. Eighty-five percent were first implants, while a 13% were replacements. Most of the electrodes used were endocardial. Chronic ischemic heart disease was found in 54% of the patients. Forty-six percent of the patients had syncopal ventricular tachycardia, 31% ventricular fibrillation and 23% sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. The generator pocket was pectoral in 87% of the patients and abdominal in 13%. The implant of the defibrillator was associated with other cardiac surgery in only 3% of the patients.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Effect of a passive endocardial electrode on defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of an inactive endocardial lead on the 50% effective dose (ED50%) for successful ventricular defibrillation. BACKGROUND: The presence of abandoned epicardial mesh patch electrodes detrimentally affects the defibrillation efficacy of an endocardial lead system. It is not known whether abandoned endocardial electrodes produce a similar effect. METHODS: An endocardial lead system (ENDOTAK, model 0062, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.) was implanted in eight dogs (mean +/- SD weight 23.7 +/- 1.0 kg). The ED50% for each of seven lead configurations was determined by a three-reversal point protocol in a balanced-randomized order with and without a second electrically passive endocardial lead system in the right ventricle (power 0.97 to detect a 50-V difference). Biphasic shocks with 80% tilt were delivered 10 s after the induction of ventricular fibrillation. In one configuration the active electrode made contact with the passive electrode in the right ventricular (RV) apex. In another configuration the active electrode was placed in a more proximal position to avoid contact. Additionally, the ED50% was determined for the endocardial lead system with a passive pacing lead positioned in the RV apex. RESULTS: ED50% values for peak voltage, peak current and delivered energy were not significantly different with or without a passive RV electrode, and this was true whether or not the active electrode touched the passive electrode. However, ED50% values were significantly higher when the active electrode was slightly proximal than when it was positioned at the apex. CONCLUSIONS: Physical contact between active and passive endocardial electrodes does not significantly alter defibrillation efficacy in this dog model. An increase in ED50% energy was caused by a slightly proximal position. Therefore, a good electrode position within the right ventricle is a more important determinant of defibrillation efficacy than is avoidance of the electrode touching a passive electrode.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the influence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) durations of 5, 10 and 20 s on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. BACKGROUND: Although the DFT using monophasic waveforms has been shown to increase with VF duration in humans, the effect of VF duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans is not known. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing primary ICD implantation or pulse generator replacement were randomly assigned to have the DFT determined using biphasic shocks at two durations of VF each (5 and 10 s, 10 and 20 s or 5 and 20 s). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean DFT comparing VF durations of 5 s (9.5+/-6.0 J) and 10 s (10.8+/-7.0 J) (p=0.4). The mean DFT significantly increased from 10.9+/-6.1 J at 10 s of VF to 12.6+/-5.6 J (p=0.03) at 20 s of VF, and from 7.0+/-3.5 J at 5 s of VF to 10.5+/-6.3 J (p=0.04) at 20 s of VF. An increase in the DFT was observed in 14 patients as VF duration increased. There were no clinical characteristics that differentiated patients with and without an increase in the DFT. CONCLUSIONS: Defibrillation efficacy decreases with increasing VF duration using biphasic waveforms in humans. Ventricular fibrillation durations greater than 10 s may negatively affect the effectiveness of ICD therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Admission to an intensive care unit after transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: analysis of risk factors.

A retrospective review was undertaken of 90 patients admitted to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit and who comprised 47% of all transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator operations performed between March 1991 and August 1995. The review aimed to evaluate the necessity for routine postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission after implantable cardioverter defibrillator operation. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were analysed. Eight of 90 patients (9%) subsequently required care unique to the ICU. None of the variables examined, including the Acute Physiology Score (APACHE II system), was helpful in identifying patients who required unique ICU services. Patients undergoing transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator surgery are identified as a low risk group requiring in over 90% of cases monitoring services rather than active therapy in an ICU. As no reliable predictors seem to exist to identify the necessity for postoperative ICU admission, cardioverter defibrillator implantations should only be performed in hospitals where adequate facilities are readily available.

APACHE↗

PubMed2006

[Automated external defibrillation in children].

Ventricular fibrillation is an infrequent arrhythmia in cardiac arrest occurring in the out-of-hospital setting in infants and small children. However, outcome is good provided early defibrillation is performed; consequently, this procedure is one of the main links in the chain of survival in children with a shockable rhythm. Automated external defibrillators are small devices that can analyze heart rhythm and deliver a dose of electric energy when considered timely by the operator. Automated external defibrillators are easy to use and can be operated, if necessary, by anyone. Therefore, all pediatricians should be aware of how these devices work and be able to use them safely and effectively, following the current defibrillation protocol.

Child↗

PubMed2001

Inappropriate arrhythmia detection in implantable defibrillator therapy due to oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials.

Nonadequate arrhythmia detection and delivery of electrical therapy is still a main problem in current implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Besides supraventricular arrhythmias extra-cardiac biosignals also can cause inadequate shock delivery. The present study focuses on nonadequate arrhythmia detection due to oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials. Their clinical characteristics, incidence and management are presented. Three-hundred-eighty-four recipients of a transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator who were implanted and followed-up at our institution between October 1991 and June 1999 were enrolled. During a mean follow-up of 32+/-25 months a total number of 139 nonadequate episodes of arrhythmia detection due to oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials were observed in 33 patients (8.6%). In 11 patients a total of 32 high energy shock deliveries occurred. Oversensing of diaphragmatic myopotentials was primarily observed in patients implanted with defibrillator leads providing "integrated bipolar" sensing. The vast majority of nonadequate arrhythmia detection were observed during intrinsic bradycardia heart rate and/or antibradycardia pacing. Electrical lead failure was ruled out in every patient. In 90% of the patients with a cardioverter-defibrillator providing programmable maximal sensitivity (n=16), the reduction of maximum sensitivity was effective in preventing further episodes of nonadequate arrhythmia detection. In 48% of the patients with devices without programmable maximal sensitivity (n=17), surgery revision was necessary to solve the problem.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Diagnostic value of single versus dual chamber electrograms recorded from an implantable defibrillator.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical utility of ventricular electrograms in comparison to atrial and ventricular electrograms in diagnosing the type of tachycardias recorded by an implantable defibrillator has not been addressed from the standpoint of a clinician's diagnostic accuracy and confidence in that diagnosis. METHODS: Fifty-two tachycardia episodes recorded from dual chamber defibrillators were divided into two tests. The initial test contained only information from the ventricular electrogram and the second test contained information from both the atrial and ventricular electrograms. For each test, the reviewers were asked to provide the specific diagnosis, the originating chamber of origin of the tachycardia, and the confidence of their responses for each question. McNemar's test for matched pairs was used to determine accuracy and an analysis of variance to determine reviewer confidence. RESULTS: The overall accuracy for both the specific diagnosis (61% vs. 79%; p < 0.001) and the chamber of origin (76% vs. 90%; p < 0.001) improved when both the atrial and ventricular electrograms were available for review. Reviewer confidence appeared to correlate with diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The data clearly show the favorable impact of dual chamber defibrillators on the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of clinicians faced with a clinical tachycardia recorded from an implantable defibrillator. Such improvements may translate into more focused and appropriate therapeutic interventions.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Subpectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation using a lateral approach.

INTRODUCTION: Third-generation cardioverter-defibrillators have revolutionized management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Implantation can be performed in the electro-physiology laboratory, with minimal morbidity. Generator size has shrunk to the point that subcutaneous implantation is feasible and safe, even under local anesthesia. The prepectoral technique, however, is associated with increased mechanical stress to the subcutaneous tissue and can predispose to device erosion or infection. These complications may be avoided by submuscular placement. Among subpectoral techniques, the lateral approach offers unrestricted ability to deploy patches or array electrodes, should the need arise, and may represent the optimal implant technique under some circumstances. METHODS: We studied 29 male patients, aged 29-78 years, who presented with syncope or sustained ventricular tachycardia, and underwent subpectoral defibrillator implantation under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. All devices were third-generation active can systems with biphasic shock capability. Six dual-chamber defibrillators were used. RESULTS: Subpectoral implantation was successful in all cases, with an estimated blood loss of 28+/-17 mL and no immediate complications. Except for one patient who developed twiddler's syndrome and ultimately required revision to a subcutaneous pocket, the implant site was tolerated well, and no limitation in the range of motion of the upper limb was observed during 20 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Subpectoral implantation using a lateral approach is technically straightforward and can be applied globally, with modest additional resource and equipment requirements. Familiarity with this approach can maximize the likelihood of successful defibrillator implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the factors that affect defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) has important implications both for optimization of defibrillation efficacy and for the design of new lead systems. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of shock polarity on defibrillation efficacy at the time of routine pulse generator replacement in patients with a hybrid patch-coil lead system. METHODS: Each patient underwent 4 assessments of DFT: monophasic or biphasic shock with standard or reversed polarity, with the order of testing with respect to polarity randomized. In standard polarity, the right atrial coil is the anode and the left ventricular patch is the cathode. RESULTS: The study population of 30 patients was 80% men with a mean age of 65 +/- 9 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 33 +/- 12%. There was a significant 21% decrease in the mean monophasic DFT with reversed polarity shocks (13.1 +/- 5.9 J vs. 16.6 +/- 6.5 J, p < 0.01). Reversal of shock polarity did not have a significant effect on the mean biphasic DFT (8.0 +/- 4.8 J vs. 8.5 +/- 4.3 J for reversed and standard polarity respectively, p = NS). However, when an elevated biphasic DFT (>or=15 J) was present in either standard or reversed polarity, a significant decrease in DFT was observed when the opposite polarity was used (16.7 +/- 2.5 J vs. 9.1 +/- 2.7 J, n = 9, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Reversal of shock polarity markedly improves monophasic DFTs with the patch-coil lead configuration. The DFT should be determined with both shock polarities to optimize defibrillation efficacy for patients with high biphasic DFTs (>or=15 J).

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Patient-specific computational analysis of transvenous defibrillation: a comparison to clinical metrics in humans.

The goal of this study is to assess the predictive capacity of computational models of transvenous defibrillation by comparing the results of patient-specific simulations to clinical defibrillation thresholds (DFT). Nine patient-specific models of the thorax and in situ electrodes were created from segmented CT images taken after implantation of the cardioverter-defibrillator. The defibrillation field distribution was computed using the finite volume method. The DFTs were extracted from the calculated field distribution using the 95% critical mass criterion. The comparison between simulated and clinical DFT energy resulted in a rms difference of 12.4 J and a 0.05 correlation coefficient (cc). The model-predicted DFTs were well matched to the clinical values in four patients (rms = 1.5 J; cc = 0.84). For the remaining five patients the rms difference was 18.4 J with a cc = 0.85. These results suggest that computational models based soley on the critical mass criterion and a single value of the inexcitability threshold are not able to consistently predict DFTs for individual patients. However, inspection of the weak potential gradient field in all nine patients revealed a relationship between the degree of dispersion of the weak field and the clinical DFT, which may help identify high DFT patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Laser surgery in a patient with Romano-Ward (long QT) syndrome and an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

A 48-year-old woman with Romano-Ward syndrome (a hereditary long QT syndrome), asthma and an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator presented for laser surgery for debulking of a massive nasopharyngeal tumour prior to radiotherapy. Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators have only relatively recently been used to treat patients with the long QT syndrome and are indicated for the high-risk individual when conventional treatment has failed or when beta-blockers are contraindicated. If surgery requires the use of surgical diathermy, a cardiac technician must be present to deactivate the defibrillator and external pacing electrodes are sited on the chest until the defibrillator can be reactivated. Radiotherapy requires both deactivation and shielding of the device.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗