Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CHLORPROPAMIDE”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,189 records · Page 66Linked to original sources

Maternal-fetal transport of hypoglycaemic drugs.

Due to legal, ethical and monetary problems, drug studies in pregnancy are rare. Numerous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes occur in pregnancy that can affect the efficacy and safety of drugs, and these are difficult to predict without appropriate studies. Drugs potentially useful and safe in pregnancy have to either not cross the placenta and/or be harmless to the fetus at clinically relevant concentrations. The first characteristic can be predicted using in vitro models such as the placenta perfusion model. In the case of glibenclamide (glyburide), in vitro experiments showed minimal maternal-fetal transfer, leading to completion of a successful clinical trial of this drug in gestational diabetes. Insulin, the main drug used in diabetes during pregnancy, has also been shown not to cross the placenta in vitro, as has insulin lispro. Animal insulin may cross the placenta when complexed with anti-insulin antibodies. Other sulphonylurea drugs (tolbutamide and chlorpropamide) have been shown to cross the placenta both in vitro and in vivo and to produce toxicity in the fetus. This review summarises the pharmacokinetic data available for hypoglycaemic drugs during pregnancy, as well as the potential role for the in vitro placenta perfusion model in the preclinical evaluation of drugs with potential usefulness in pregnancy.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Glipizide: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Glipizide is a 'second generation' oral hypoglycaemic agent similar in potency to glibenclamide. It is completely absorbed after oral administration and has a rapid onset of action, but the duration of its hypoglycaemic effect is shorter than that of glibenclamide. It is rapidly metabolised to inactive metabolites which are excreted in the urine. Therapeutic trials have shown the efficacy of glipizide in maturity onset diabetes mellitus to be comparable with that of glibenclamide and chlorpropamide in newly diagnosed patients unresponsive to diet as well as in patients previously treated with oral hypoglycaemic drugs. Glipizide is well tolerated, but careful adjustment of dosage and attention to diet may be needed to avoid hypoglycaemic symptoms a few hours after a single daily dose.

Animals↗

Clinical pharmacology of sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents: part 1.

The sulphonylureas are drugs of limited efficacy with fairly frequent, although usually reversible, adverse effects. Being highly protein bound, these drugs are subject to potential displacement interactions, which when combined with inhibition of their elimination, may result in profound hypoglycaemia. Due to hepatic metabolism and renal excretion of the parent drug and/or active metabolites, these agents are contraindicated in patients with liver or kidney disease. Oral hypoglycaemic agents are frequently used in elderly patients with limited vision and no dependable relatives, who cannot give themselves insulin. It is these patients--elderly, living alone in poor circumstances, often on several other medications, and possibly malnourished--who are at greatest risk for catastrophic hypoglycaemia with these drugs. Long acting agents like chlorpropamide and glibenclamide should be avoided in the elderly and in patients with irregular eating habits. Diet and exercise remain the primary modes of therapy of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. With careful patient selection and attention to drug and disease interactions, the sulphonylureas may be a useful adjunct to diet in treating a small proportion of insulin-resistant (so-called adult onset) diabetics. Patients most likely to respond to sulphonylureas are over 40 years old, mildly to moderately obese, have had diabetes for less than 5 years, and have never exhibited ketosis. There is no indication for simultaneous use of sulphonylureas and insulin. With both insulin and the oral hypoglycaemics alcohol is the agent most commonly implicated in lethal interactions.

Diabetes Mellitus↗

Interactions between herbal medicines and prescribed drugs: a systematic review.

Despite the widespread use of herbal medicines, documented herb-drug interactions are sparse. We have reviewed the literature to determine the possible interactions between the seven top-selling herbal medicines (ginkgo, St John's wort, ginseng, garlic, echinacea, saw palmetto and kava) and prescribed drugs. Literature searches were performed using the following databases: Medline (via Pubmed), Cochrane Library, Embase and phytobase (all from their inception to July 2000). All data relating to herb-drug interactions were included regardless of whether they were based on case reports, case series, clinical trials or other types of investigation in humans. In vitro experiments were excluded. Data were extracted by the first author and validated by the second author. 41 case reports or case series and 17 clinical trials were identified. The results indicate that St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) lowers blood concentrations of cyclosporin, amitriptyline, digoxin, indinavir, warfarin, phenprocoumon and theophylline; furthermore it causes intermenstrual bleeding, delirium or mild serotonin syndrome, respectively, when used concomitantly with oral contraceptives (ethinylestradiol/desogestrel), loperamide or selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (sertaline, paroxetine, nefazodone). Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) interactions include bleeding when combined with warfarin, raised blood pressure when combined with a thiazide diuretic and coma when combined with trazodone. Ginseng (Panax ginseng) lowers blood concentrations of alcohol and warfarin, and induces mania if used concomitantly with phenelzine. Garlic (Allium sativum) changes pharmacokinetic variables of paracetamol, decreases blood concentrations of warfarin and produces hypoglycaemia when taken with chlorpropamide. Kava (Piper methysticum) increases 'off' periods in Parkinson patients taking levodopa and can cause a semicomatose state when given concomitantly with alprazolam. No interactions were found for echinacea (Echinacea angustifolia, E. purpurea, E. pallida) and saw palmetto (Serenoa repens). In conclusion, interactions between herbal medicines and synthetic drugs exist and can have serious clinical consequences. Healthcare professionals should ask their patients about the use of herbal products and consider the possibility of herb-drug interactions.

Drug Interactions↗

Herb-drug interactions: a literature review.

Herbs are often administered in combination with therapeutic drugs, raising the potential of herb-drug interactions. An extensive review of the literature identified reported herb-drug interactions with clinical significance, many of which are from case reports and limited clinical observations. Cases have been published reporting enhanced anticoagulation and bleeding when patients on long-term warfarin therapy also took Salvia miltiorrhiza (danshen). Allium sativum (garlic) decreased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration of saquinavir, but not ritonavir and paracetamol (acetaminophen), in volunteers. A. sativum increased the clotting time and international normalised ratio of warfarin and caused hypoglycaemia when taken with chlorpropamide. Ginkgo biloba (ginkgo) caused bleeding when combined with warfarin or aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), raised blood pressure when combined with a thiazide diuretic and even caused coma when combined with trazodone in patients. Panax ginseng (ginseng) reduced the blood concentrations of alcohol (ethanol) and warfarin, and induced mania when used concomitantly with phenelzine, but ginseng increased the efficacy of influenza vaccination. Scutellaria baicalensis (huangqin) ameliorated irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal toxicity in cancer patients.Piper methysticum (kava) increased the 'off' periods in patients with parkinsonism taking levodopa and induced a semicomatose state when given concomitantly with alprazolam. Kava enhanced the hypnotic effect of alcohol in mice, but this was not observed in humans. Silybum marianum (milk thistle) decreased the trough concentrations of indinavir in humans. Piperine from black (Piper nigrum Linn) and long (P. longum Linn) peppers increased the AUC of phenytoin, propranolol and theophylline in healthy volunteers and plasma concentrations of rifamipicin (rifampin) in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Eleutheroccus senticosus (Siberian ginseng) increased the serum concentration of digoxin, but did not alter the pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan and alprazolam in humans. Hypericum perforatum (hypericum; St John's wort) decreased the blood concentrations of ciclosporin (cyclosporin), midazolam, tacrolimus, amitriptyline, digoxin, indinavir, warfarin, phenprocoumon and theophylline, but did not alter the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, pravastatin, mycophenolate mofetil and dextromethorphan. Cases have been reported where decreased ciclosporin concentrations led to organ rejection. Hypericum also caused breakthrough bleeding and unplanned pregnancies when used concomitantly with oral contraceptives. It also caused serotonin syndrome when used in combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g. sertraline and paroxetine). In conclusion, interactions between herbal medicines and prescribed drugs can occur and may lead to serious clinical consequences. There are other theoretical interactions indicated by preclinical data. Both pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic mechanisms have been considered to play a role in these interactions, although the underlying mechanisms for the altered drug effects and/or concentrations by concomitant herbal medicines are yet to be determined. The clinical importance of herb-drug interactions depends on many factors associated with the particular herb, drug and patient. Herbs should be appropriately labeled to alert consumers to potential interactions when concomitantly used with drugs, and to recommend a consultation with their general practitioners and other medical carers.

Animals↗

Cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance: effects of oral antidiabetic agents.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a greater risk of cardiovascular disease than nondiabetic individuals. These patients are often insulin resistant and have an associated clustering of risk factors that contribute to cardiovascular disease. The risk factors include dyslipidemia, hypertension, altered hemostasis, and chronic inflammation. A primary objective in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus is normalization of blood glucose levels; however, some of the oral drugs used to control blood glucose levels have significant effects on these risk factors. In this article, we review the current data involving the modification of these cardiovascular risk factors by the biguanide (metformin), the thiazolidinediones (troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone), the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (miglitol, acarbose), and the insulin secretagogs (glyburide [glibenclamide], glipizide, chlorpropamide, tolbutamide, tolazamide, glimepiride, repaglinide, and nateglinide). Generally, the thiazolidinediones improve hemostasis and endothelial function and reduce blood pressure, while having variable effects on dyslipidemia. Metformin improves dyslipidemia and altered hemostasis and decreases plasma C-reactive protein levels with little or no effect on blood pressure. Data on the effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and insulin secretagogs are sparse; however, these drugs appear to have little or no effect on cardiovascular risk factors.

Administration, Oral↗

Tolbutamide-induced hemolytic anemia.

A 67-year-old female diabetic is presented who developed a Coombs'-positive hemolytic anemia after a year of treatment with tolbutamide. An IgG antibody was identified in the patient's serum that caused the agglutination of both the patient's red blood cells and tolbutamide-coated erythrocytes in the absence of complement. Such a reaction did not occur with the patient's erythrocytes when not exposed to tolbutamide. Agglutination of the patient's serum also occurred with erythrocytes treated with other sulfonylureas (chlorpropamide, glibenclamide, carbutamide) but not with phenacetin.

Aged↗

Effect of dynorphin on insulin and somatostatin secretion, calcium uptake, and c-AMP levels in isolated rat islets of Langerhans.

Dynorphin-[1-13], at concentrations of 5.8 X 10(-12) to 5.8 X 10(-9) M, stimulated insulin secretion from isolated islets of Langerhans of the rat, in medium containing 6 mM glucose. Higher concentrations of dynorphin had no significant effect on secretion. Dynorphin (5.8 X 10(-9) M) was unable to initiate insulin release from islets in the presence of 2 mM glucose, or to increase insulin secretion further in the presence of 20 mM glucose or 6 and 12 mM glyceraldehyde. Dynorphin-induced insulin secretion from islets was blocked by verapamil (5 microM) or by chlorpropamide (72 microM), but not by a mu opiate receptor antagonist, naloxone (0.11 microM), or by ICI 154129, a specific antagonist for the delta receptor (0.25 microM). Dynorphin had no effect on islet somatostatin secretion, under conditions in which insulin secretion was greatly stimulated. Glucose (20 mM) and glyceraldehyde (6 and 12 mM) significantly increased both insulin and somatostatin secretion. Dynorphin (5.8 X 10(-9) M) increased 45Ca2+ uptake into islets, and also increased intracellular islet c-AMP levels. These changes persisted when higher concentrations of dynorphin were used. These results suggest that (1) dynorphin is a very potent stimulus for insulin secretion; (2) dynorphin does not affect somatostatin secretion in static incubations of islets, in the same way as does glucose and glyceraldehyde; (3) dynorphin's effects may involve increased calcium ion movement and can be blocked by verapamil; (4) dynorphin can also increase islet c-AMP, and could thereby modulate the responsiveness of other secretagogues; (5) the actions of dynorphin on insulin secretion are not mediated by delta or mu opiate receptors in islets.

Animals↗

Kinetics-effect relations of insulin-releasing drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: brief overview.

Sulfonylureas and glinides have similar mechanisms of action but differ in receptor affinity and binding sites and in absorption and elimination rates. This promotes differences in potency, rate of onset, and duration of action. While prominent in single-dose studies, these differences have less importance during long-term sulfonylurea treatment: at ordinary dosages, rapid- and short-acting (glipizide) and slow- and long-acting (glyburide) sulfonylureas maintained continuously effective plasma levels and similar 24-h glucose control. Moreover, there was no difference in patient outcome between the first-generation sulfonylurea chlorpropamide and the second-generation glyburide in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study. However, the risk of long-lasting and hence dangerous hypoglycemia is higher with these two long-acting sulfonylureas. Conversely, this risk should be low with the short-acting glinides, but seemingly at the expense of less effective glucose control. The most important kinetics-effect relations are that hyperglycemia delays sulfonylurea absorption and that the sulfonylurea dose-response curve is bell shaped; continuous sulfonylurea exposure over a certain level (e.g., 10 mg glipizide) impairs rather than improves insulin and glucose responses to sulfonylurea (downregulation). Accordingly, a vicious circle may be established: unrelenting hyperglycemia may promote sulfonylurea dose increase, which increases hyperglycemia, promoting further dose increase and eventually therapeutic failure.

Blood Glucose↗

Trends in use of oral hypoglycemic agents 1964-1986.

Oral hypoglycemic (OH) agents have been available in the United States for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) for almost 30 yr. During this time they have been subject to considerable controversy. In this article, we present pharmaceutical marketing research data that provide a review of several facets of OH use. The number of OH prescriptions dispensed peaked in 1973, decreased through 1980, and has been increasing since that year. In 1986, OH agents accounted for 21.5 million prescriptions: 1% of all prescriptions dispensed that year. Chlorpropamide is currently the most frequently ingested OH agent; it is used by 33% of the market. The two OH agents introduced in 1984, glyburide and glipizide, had acquired 41% of the OH market by the end of 1986. The rate of OH use per 1000 diabetes mellitus visits increases with patient's age. Patients aged 60 yr and older received OH prescriptions at a rate of 478 per 1000 diabetes mellitus visits in 1986. Data estimating both the number of patients diagnosed with diabetes and the number of diabetic patients taking OH agents indicate that the percentage receiving OH treatment has increased over the past 5 yr, with approximately 35% of all diabetic patients taking OH agents in 1986.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2↗

Symptomatic hypoglycemia in NIDDM patients treated with oral hypoglycemic agents.

We assessed the prevalence of hypoglycemic symptoms in patients (aged 40-65 yr) treated with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) attending routine diabetes clinics at our hospital. Symptoms were experienced during the previous 6 mo in 41 of 203 (20.2%) patients treated with sulfonylureas but in none of the 16 patients treated with metformin alone. Hypoglycemic symptoms were experienced at least monthly in 5.9% and less frequently in 14.3% of patients. The prevalence of symptoms decreased with increasing duration of sulfonylurea administration (P less than .01). Mean glycosylated hemoglobin and postprandial plasma glucose were significantly lower in patients reporting hypoglycemic symptoms than in those without symptoms (P less than .001). The prevalence of hypoglycemic symptoms was significantly higher in patients treated with glyburide than in patients treated with gliclazide (P less than .01) or chlorpropamide (P less than .05). The prevalence of symptoms was higher in patients taking medications in addition to OHAs (P less than .01). Ten (24%) of the patients who experienced hypoglycemic symptoms were taking drugs that may potentiate sulfonylureas.

Adult↗

Biguanides and sulfonylureas as combination therapy in NIDDM.

Oral combination therapy with biguanides (metformin) and sulfonylureas is discussed. The rationale for the use of this combination is based on the different sites of action of the two kinds of drugs and the possibility for obtaining additive or potentiating effects and reduced side effects. The clinical usefulness of chlorpropamide and glyburide in combination with metformin has been demonstrated in some clinical trials. The combination may provide satisfactory glycemic control for several years, and possibly insulin therapy can be postponed or even avoided. No special safety problems are encountered with the use of the combination other than those attributed to the use of metformin or sulfonylurea alone, i.e., lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia, respectively. The lethality risks of these associated conditions are comparable. It is concluded that more data are needed to evaluate the full clinical potential and the mechanism of action of oral combination therapy.

Adult↗

Induced basal normoglycemia and altered platelet aggregation in non-insulin-dependent diabetes.

Non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects had abnormally raised in vitro platelet aggregation rates to collagen or ristocetin when thought to be "well-controlled" on diet alone but shown to have raised basal plasma glucose levels. Basal normoglycemia, induced with either ultralente insulin or chlorpropamide, was associated with a significant reduction of the enhanced platelet aggregation rates to normal. Some sulfonylurea drugs have been reported to have specific anti-platelet aggregatory properties, but the degree of plasma glucose control is probably more relevant.

Blood Glucose↗

Antibodies to vasopressin in patients with diabetes insipidus. Implications for diagnosis and therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether antibodies to vasopressin play a role in the development of diabetes insipidus or interfere with diagnosis and treatment. DESIGN: Random plasma or serum samples for determining of antibodies to vasopressin were collected from patients and controls. SETTING: Referral university hospital with most patients studied in the clinical research center. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine healthy controls and 113 patients with polyuria (15 with primary polydipsia; 86 with neurogenic diabetes insipidus [60 studied before, 28 during, and 10 after antidiuretic hormone treatment]; and 12 with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus). INTERVENTIONS: Antibodies were detected by incubating samples with radiolabeled 125I-arginine vasopressin. The effect of antibodies on diagnosis was studied by examining the relation of plasma vasopressin to osmolality measured during dehydration or infusion of hypertonic saline and the relation of urine osmolality to plasma vasopressin measured during dehydration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Antibodies to vasopressin were not detected in patients with primary polydipsia, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, or neurogenic diabetes insipidus studied before therapy with antidiuretic hormone. Antibodies were detected in 6 of 28 patients studied during such treatments. All 6 patients reported decreased antidiuretic response to previously effective therapy with arginine or lysine vasopressin but had normal response to desmopressin or chlorpropamide. CONCLUSION: Diabetes insipidus does not result from spontaneously occurring antibodies to vasopressin. The antibodies occasionally develop during treatment with antidiuretic hormone and, when they do, almost always result in secondary resistance to its antidiuretic effect. Antibodies usually do not impair the response to other forms of therapy; they only rarely interfere with the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus, by falsely suggesting the presence of the partial nephrogenic form.

Adolescent↗

United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 24: a 6-year, randomized, controlled trial comparing sulfonylurea, insulin, and metformin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet therapy. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists about the suitability of oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin therapy for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare response to sulfonylurea, insulin, or metformin over 6 years in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in whom disease could and could not be controlled with diet therapy alone. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient diabetes clinics of 15 hospitals in the United Kingdom. INTERVENTION: Sulfonylurea (chlorpropamide or glyburide), insulin, or metformin (if patients were obese). PATIENTS: 458 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet and had hyperglycemic symptoms or fasting plasma glucose levels greater than 15 mmol/L during the initial 3 months of diet therapy (primary diet failure group) and 1620 patients in whom disease was controlled by diet therapy and who had fasting plasma glucose levels of 6 to 15 mmol/L and no hyperglycemic symptoms while receiving diet therapy alone. MEASUREMENTS: Fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin, hemoglobin A1c concentrations, body weight, and therapy required. RESULTS: Compared with the diet-controlled group, the primary diet failure group was younger and less obese and had more retinopathy, lower fasting plasma insulin levels, and reduced beta-cell function. At 6 years, patients allocated to insulin had lower fasting plasma glucose levels than did patients allocated to oral agents, but hemoglobin A1c concentrations were similar. Forty-eight percent (95% CI, 37% to 58%) of patients in the primary diet failure group maintained hemoglobin A1c concentrations less than 0.08. By 6 years, 51% of patients (CI, 42% to 62%) allocated to ultralente insulin required additional short-acting insulin and 66% of patients (CI, 58% to 73%) allocated to sulfonylurea required additional therapy with metformin or insulin to control symptoms and maintain fasting plasma glucose levels less than 15 mmol/L. Patients allocated to insulin gained more weight and had more hypoglycemic attacks than did patients allocated to sulfonylurea. Obese patients allocated to metformin gained the least weight and had the fewest hypoglycemic attacks. For all therapies, control achieved at 6 years was worse in the primary diet failure group than in the diet-controlled group. CONCLUSIONS: Because initial insulin therapy induced more hypoglycemic reactions and weight gain without necessarily providing better control, it may be reasonable to start with oral agents and change to insulin if goals for glycemic levels are not achieved.

Adult↗

Neurogenic diabetes insipidus: management with dDAVP (1-desamino-8-D arginine vasopressin).

We used dDAVP, the 1-desamino-8-D arginine analogue of arginine vasopressin with high antidiuretic and low vasopressor potency, to treat 29 patients with neurogenic diabetes insipidus for up to 22 months. Intranasal dDAVP, 2.5 to 15 microgram twice daily, provided excellent control in most patients. Individual responses were independent of age, weight, and severity of diabetes insipidus. Resistance to dDAVP may be a rare complication of prolonged therapy. Two patients with acute postoperative diabetes insipidus were effectively treated with 5 microgram of dDAVP every 14 to 18 h. Compared to previous therapy, side effects of dDAVP were minimal (headaches in two patients), and control of symptoms and urine volume was as good as with vasopressin tannate in oil or better than chlorpropamide and lysine vasopressin nasal spray. We conclude that intranasal dDAVP, because of efficacy, long duration of action, and infrequent side effects, is the preferred treatment of neurogenic diabetes insipidus in children and adults.

Adolescent↗

Clinical, biological and pathogenic features of the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. A review of 26 cases with marked hyponatraemia.

Twenty-six patients with the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone were reviewed. The underlying diseases were bronchogenic carcinoma (12 cases); myxoedema (five cases); diseases of the nervous system (five cases); bronchopneumonia, carcinoma of the oesophagus, acute intermittent porphria and chlorpropamide therapy (each one case). Serum sodium levels ranged between 104 and 125 mEq per litre. Eighteen patients presented neurological manifestations, which in 14 were considered to be due to hyponatraemia. Neurological signs included disorders of consciousness (stage I and II coma), extrapyramidal signs, asterixis and epileptic seizures. An hyponatraemic coma was the first manifestation of the syndrome in five cases. In all cases where the EEG was recorded it showed non-specific signs of metabolic coma. The fundi never showed signs of intracranial hypertension. Blood urea and creatinine levels were invariably low in the euthyroid patients; these values were normal or elevated in patients with myxoedema and hyponatraemia. Hypokalaemia was frequent, and hypocalcaemia constant. In eleven cases an excess of water intake revealed the clinical syndrome: six patients were excessive beer drinkers and five had received extensive intravenous infusions. In one case the deleterious effect of diuretics was evident, and in another, the syndrome became evident during radiotherapy of an oesophageal tumour. Treatment of the syndrome was successful in all cases. A review of the literature concerning the various pathogenic mechanisms corresponding to the different underlying diseases is presented. The concept of aberrant hormonal production by a tumour is illustrated by an electron microscopic study.

Adult↗

[Use of sulfonylurea (SU) in the treatment of diabetes mellitus].

The main action of SU in the treatment of diabetes mellitus is the stimulation of insulin secretion, and the extrapancreatic action including stimulation of insulin actions in glycogen synthesis and inhibition of glucose production in liver is also reported. The indication of SU in the treatment of diabetes mellitus is for NIDDM usually after diet therapy or suitable exercise therapy. In IDDM and several special cases including diabetic ketoacidosis, severe infection, pregnancy, poor-controlled NIDDM, gangrane, surgery operation, severe renal or hepatic failure et al. insulin therapy should be started. In mild NIDDM, gliclazide, tolbutamide or acetohexamide is used, and in more severe NIDDM glibenclamide is used. The action time of chlorpropamide is very long, usually from 20 to 60 hours, therefore special care should be taken for hypoglycemia. As the causes for secondary failure, transition from NIDDM to IDDM, failure of diet therapy, glucose toxity and others are considered.

Aged↗