Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reliability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,171 records · Page 65Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls.

PURPOSE: To examine the reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scales in adolescent girls during treadmill exercise. METHODS: Adolescent girls (N = 57, age = 15.3+/-1.5 yr) were randomly assigned to use an RPE scale (Borg or OMNI) during one of three treadmill submaximal exercise conditions (walking, walking uphill, or jogging). After RPE assessment, exercise intensity was increased until participants achieved volitional exhaustion (O2max). Expired respiratory gases and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously during exercise. Reliability of the RPE scales was assessed using ANOVA (intraclass) and Spearman-Brown prophecy formula (single trial) measures. Validity estimates were calculated using Pearson Product Moment correlations, with % HRmax and % O2max as criterion measures. RESULTS: Intraclass and single-trial reliability estimates were higher for the OMNI (r(xx) = 0.95 and r(kk) = 0.91, respectively) compared with the Borg (r(xx) = 0.78 and r(kk) = 0.64, respectively) RPE scale. Validity estimates were also higher for the OMNI scale compared with the Borg scale. Validity coefficients (r(xy)) for %HRmax and %O2max comparisons were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively, for the OMNI, compared with 0.66 and 0.70, respectively, for the Borg. CONCLUSION: The OMNI cycle pictorial scale was found to be reliable and valid for use with adolescent girls. It also appears to be more reliable and valid than the Borg scale for use in this population during treadmill exercise.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Model testing for reliability and validity of the Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale.

BACKGROUND: Development of a reliable and valid measure of outcome expectations for exercise appropriate for older adults will help establish the relationship between outcome expectations and exercise. Once established, this measure can be used to facilitate the development of interventions to strengthen outcome expectations and improve adherence to regular exercise in older adults. OBJECTIVES: Building on initial psychometrics of the Outcome Expectation for Exercise (OEE) Scale, the purpose of the current study was to use structural equation modeling to provide additional support for the reliability and validity of this measure. METHODS: The OEE scale is a 9-item measure specifically focusing on the perceived consequences of exercise for older adults. The OEE scale was given to 191 residents in a continuing care retirement community. The mean age of the participants was 85 +/- 6.1 and the majority were female (76%), White (99%), and unmarried (76%). Using structural equation modeling, reliability was based on R2 values, and validity was based on a confirmatory factor analysis and path coefficients. RESULTS: There was continued evidence for reliability of the OEE based on R2 values ranging from .42 to .77, and validity with path coefficients ranging from .69 to .87, and evidence of model fit (X2 of 69, df = 27, p < .05, NFI = .98, RMSEA = .07). CONCLUSION: The evidence of reliability and validity of this measure has important implications for clinical work and research. The OEE scale can be used to identify older adults who have low outcome expectations for exercise, and interventions can then be implemented to strengthen these expectations and thereby improve exercise behavior.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Reliability of a simple non-invasive method for the evaluation of 5-HT2 receptors using [18F]-setoperone PET imaging.

Position emission tomography (PET) imaging of 5-HT2 receptors can be potentially very useful in investigating neuropsychiatric disorders and their pharmacological treatments. [18F]-setoperone, a PET radio-ligand, has been shown to be useful for the delineation of 5-HT2 receptors in the cortex. However, there is no available data regarding the scan-rescan reliability of this technique. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the [18F]-setoperone PET technique for assessing the binding potential (Bmax/ Kd) for 5-HT2 receptors. Ten healthy subjects had two [18F]-setoperone PET scans on two separate occasions 6-21 days apart. The average difference in the 5-HT2 binding potential (BP) as measured on the two occasions in the prefrontal, temporal, parietal and occipital region was between 5 and 7%. Thus 5-HT2 BP can be measured with a high reliability using a non-invasive technique that uses the cerebellum as a reference region. A power analysis based on the reliability data suggests that this technique can be used to detect within-subject differences of 10% or more, and between-group differences of 25% or more, with a reasonable number of subjects. It is concluded that [18F]-setoperone can be routinely produced and reliably used for the PET imaging of 5-HT2 receptors in clinical situations.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Reliabilities of alternate measures of contrast sensitivity functions.

In four studies, the comparability of several measures of contrast sensitivity functions (CSF's) as well as their individual test-retest reliabilities were determined with observers drawn from a college population. The relation between CSF scores obtained by different tests or by different psychophysical procedures with the same test was consistently low and frequently nonexistent. These low intertest reliabilities were found to be due to the lack of reliability of some of the individual tests. In particular, with both stationary and flickering gratings, the von Bekesy tracking procedure produced unacceptable variations in contrast estimates. Fortunately, the reliabilities of other procedures, particularly the simple adjustment method, were much higher (greater than 0.70). CSF scores obtained from the wallchart method exhibited insufficient variability among observers in the college sample to permit similar reliability estimates to be determined. Implications of the test characteristics are discussed for users of the CSF.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Reliability of the Vistech Contrast Test System in a life-span adult sample.

To assess the reliability of the Vistech Contrast Test System (VCTS), contrast sensitivity functions (CSF's) were estimated using all forms of the VCTS in 92 subjects aged 20 to 73 years, who were refracted for the test distance. Over a 3-month period, nine estimates at each spatial frequency and an equivalent number of acuity measures were obtained. The contrast sensitivity of older adults was lower than that of the younger adults, particularly at higher spatial frequencies. Practice effects which varied as a function of spatial frequency were also observed. Reliabilities for single-form estimates of contrast sensitivity (CS) were frequency-dependent, and ranged from 0.41 to 0.65. Three-form average estimates of CS yielded reliabilities ranging from 0.62 to 0.77. Consistent with the assertion that low VCTS reliabilities are due, in part, to measurement error, the reliabilities for acuity were uniformly higher than for the VCTS. Results are discussed in relation to clinical use of the VCTS across the life-span.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Vistech VCTS 6500 charts--within- and between-session reliability.

The aim of the study was to measure the reliability of the Vistech VCTS 6500 charts, in test score units, in order to allow clinicians to derive estimates of what constitutes a clinically meaningful change in performance over time. The reliability of a more familiar test, Bailey-Lovie high contrast visual acuity, was also measured to provide a comparison. Patients with normal vision and with early or subtle eye disease were recruited so that the results would be representative of the population likely to present for primary vision screening. Patients were tested on all three VCTS charts on two separate occasions at least 3 weeks apart to give estimates of within- and between-session reliability. Reliability was found to be low in all circumstances; between-session reliability could be improved by using the mean score for the three charts, but the 95% range of difference scores still encompassed at least one-half of the total performance range of the test. It was concluded that Vistech charts are unlikely to be of use for clinical measurements or for research studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

The reliability and validity of hand-held refractometry water content measures of hydrogel lenses.

PURPOSE: To investigate within- and between-examiner reliability and validity of hand-held refractometry water content measures of hydrogel lenses. METHODS: Nineteen lenses of various nominal water contents were examined by two examiners on two occasions separated by 1 hour. An Atago N2 hand-held refractometer was used for all water content measures. Lenses were presented in a random order to each examiner by a third party, and examiners were masked to any potential lens identifiers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 95% limits of agreement, and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to characterize the within- and between-examiner reliability and validity of lens water content measures. RESULTS: Within-examiner reliability was excellent (ICC, 0.97; 95% limits of agreement, -3.6% to +5.7%), and the inter-visit mean difference of 1.1 +/- 2.4% was not biased (p = 0.08). Between-examiner reliability was also excellent (ICC, 0.98; 95% limits of agreement, -4.1% to +3.9%). The mean difference between examiners was -0.1 +/- 2.1% (p = 0.83). The mean difference between the nominally reported water content and our water content measures was -2.1 +/- 1.7% (p < 0.001); the 95% limits of agreement for this difference were -5.4% to +1.1%. CONCLUSION: There is good reliability within and between examiners in measuring water content of hydrogel lenses. However, with our sample of lenses, examiners tended to overestimate the nominal water content of hydrogel lenses. As discussed, this bias may be associated with the Brix scale used in refractometry and is material dependent. Therefore, investigators may need to account for bias when measuring hydrogel lens water content via hand-held refractometry.

Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic↗
PubMed1999

Reliability of self-reported sexual histories: test-retest and interpartner comparison in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess reliability of self-reported sexual histories among sexually transmitted disease clinic attendees who enrolled in a study in 1994. GOAL OF THIS STUDY: Knowledge about the reliability of sexual data is important to decide whether these measures of sexual behavior can be used in epidemiologic studies of sexually transmitted diseases. STUDY DESIGN: In 288 attendees, degree of agreement was assessed in responses to an identical set of sexual questions asked independently by a medical doctor and a public health nurse and in responses made by members of the same couple (n = 50) to a public health nurse. RESULTS: In the test-retest comparison, high agreement was found for most questions: kappa-values and exact agreement ranged from 0.73 to 0.96 and 54% to 99%, respectively. Participants interviewed by the medical doctor reported significantly lower numbers of partners and a higher age at first intercourse. Stratified analyses showed variability in agreement across subgroups. Most consistent, women provided more reliable reports than men. In the comparison of couples, substantial agreement was found for the municipality where they met (88% agreement; kappa = 0.72) and contraceptive method (87% agreement; kappa = 0.60), but only moderate agreement was found for frequency of sexual intercourse (26% agreement; kappa = 0.50). CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that data on sexual behavior can be collected reliably among sexually transmitted disease clinic attendees, although reporting bias does occur. The frequency of sexual intercourse was not sufficiently reliable and should be interpreted as an estimate only.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating.

STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures design for intra- and interrater reliability. OBJECTIVES: To determine the intra- and interrater reliability of the lumbar spine range of motion measured with a dual inclinometer, and the thoracolumbar spine range of motion measured with a long-arm goniometer, as recommended in the American Medical Association Guides. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The American Medical Association Guides (2nd and 4th editions) recommend using measurements of thoracolumbar and lumbar range of movement, respectively, to estimate the percentage of permanent impairment in patients with chronic low back pain. However, the reliability of this method of estimating impairment has not been determined. METHODS: In all, 34 subjects participated in the study, 21 women with a mean age of 40.1 years (SD, +/- 11.1) and 13 men with a mean age of 47.7 years (SD, +/- 12.1). Measures of thoracolumbar flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation were obtained with a long-arm goniometer. Lumbar flexion, extension, and lateral flexion were measured with a dual inclinometer. Measurements were taken by two examiners on one occasion and by one examiner on two occasions approximately 1 week apart. RESULTS: The results showed poor intra- and interrater reliability for all measurements taken with both instruments. Measurement error expressed in degrees showed that measurements taken by different raters exhibited systematic as well as random differences. As a result, subjects measured by two different examiners on the same day, with either instrument, could give impairment ratings ranging between 0% and 18% of the whole person (excluding rotation), in which percentage impairment is calculated using the average range of motion and the average systematic and random error in degrees for the group for each movement (flexion, extension, and lateral flexion). CONCLUSIONS: The poor reliability of the American Medical Association Guides' spinal range of motion model can result in marked variation in the percentage of whole-body impairment. These findings have implications for compensation bodies in Australia and other countries that use the American Medical Association Guides' procedure to estimate impairment in chronic low back pain patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Reliability of the isokinetic trunk extensor test, Biering-Sørensen test, and Astrand bicycle test: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficient and critical difference in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy individuals.

STUDY DESIGN: A reliability study was performed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the intersession reproducibility of the isokinetic trunk extensor strength test, the Biering-Sørensen test, and the Astrand test by calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient and the critical difference. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several physical measurements have been used in clinical evaluation of patients with chronic low back pain. Reliability can be evaluated by calculation of either intraclass correlation coefficient or critical difference, but interpretation of the results may vary depending on which method is used. METHODS: For this study, 31 patients with chronic low back pain carried out the isokinetic trunk extensor test, the Biering-Sørensen test, and the Astrand test as also did age- and gender-matched healthy individuals. Measurements were performed in three separate sessions at the same time of the day and by the same experienced examiner. The intervals between the sessions were 5 to 10 days. RESULTS: The isokinetic tests showed a learning effect between Tests 1 and 2. For the isokinetic test, the critical difference increased with increased angular velocities from 28% to 63% in the patients and from 27% to 39% in the healthy subjects. The critical differences for the patients and the healthy individuals were 57% vs 54% for the Biering-Sørensen test and 21% vs 23% for the Astrand test, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 93% to 98% in the patients and 80%-98% in the healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability was found to be acceptable for the Astrand test and the isokinetic test at 60 degrees per second, as evaluated by the critical difference. All the tests were highly reliable according to the intraclass correlation coefficient, except for Biering-Sørensen test for healthy individuals. The critical difference is the preferable measure because calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient may give a misleading high estimate of reliability.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis was performed in a group of women meeting strict criteria for posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy (PPPP). The scores on the Active Straight Leg Raise Test (ASLR test) were compared with the scores of healthy controls. OBJECTIVES: To develop a new diagnostic instrument for use in patients with PPPP. The objectives of the present study were to assess the validity and reliability of the ASLR test. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various diagnostic tools are used to diagnose PPPP, but there is still a need for simple tests with high reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. METHODS: Reliability of the ASLR test was assessed in a group of 50 women with lumbopelvic pain of various etiologies and various degrees of severity. Sensitivity was assessed in 200 patients with PPPP and specificity in 50 healthy women. Sensitivity and specificity of the ASLR test were compared with the posterior pelvic pain provocation test (PPPP test). RESULTS: The test-retest reliability measured with Pearson's correlation coefficient between the two ASLR scores 1 week apart was 0.87. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.83. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the scores of the patient and the scores of a blinded assessor was 0.78; the ICC was 0.77. In the patient group, the ASLR score ranged from 0-10; in the control group it ranged from 0-2. The best balance between specificity and sensitivity was found when scores 1-10 are designated as positive and zero as negative. With this cut-off point sensitivity of the test was 0.87 and specificity was 0.94. The sensitivity of the ASLR test is higher than the sensitivity of the PPPP test; an advantage of the ASLR test is the simplicity of measuring the score. CONCLUSION: The ASLR test is a suitable diagnostic instrument to discriminate between patients who are disabled by PPPP and healthy subjects. The test is easy to perform; reliability, sensitivity, and specificity are high. It seems that the integrity of the function to transfer loads between the lumbosacral spine and legs is tested by the ASLR test.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Thirty lateral thoracic radiographs were digitized twice by each of the three examiners. OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of the centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods when applied to analysis of thoracic kyphosis. BACKGROUND DATA: Reliability studies on measurements of thoracic kyphosis are rare. METHODS: Blind, repeated-measures design was used. Thirty lateral thoracic radiographs were digitized twice by each of three examiners. To evaluate reliability of determining global and segmental alignment, vertebral bodies of T1-T12 were digitized. Centroids at the intersection of vertebral body diagonals and tangents to posterior vertebral bodies were constructed by computer. Also the computer constructed global and segmental centroid angles, Cobb angles (two-line method), and posterior tangent intersection angles from T1 to T12. Interclass and Intraclass correlation coefficients for these data were calculated and interpreted. RESULTS: From the points selected by examiners, all three methods have similar high ICC values for the global angles (> 0.94). For the segmental angles, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability is also very similar for all three methods, with ICCs in the good and excellent ranges (0.59-0.75 and 0.75-1.0, respectively). The mean absolute differences of observers' measurements are low, similar, and in the range of 0.9 degrees to 2.5 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: The centroid, two-line Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods, when applied to measurements of kyphosis, are all reliable and have similar small error ranges. The centroid method does not give an accurate segmental analysis, uses more points and more time in clinical applications, and results in smaller angles of total kyphosis than the Cobb or posterior tangent methods. The posterior tangents are the slopes along the curve.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: The Shuttle Walking Test (SWT), the Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) Questionnaire, the Oxford Claudication Score (OCS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered to patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. OBJECTIVE: To determine reliability of the SWT, the SSS (Q1-12), the OCS, and the ODI in lumbar spinal stenosis assessment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Reliability data for exercise tests in lumbar spinal stenosis are lacking. METHODS: To determine reliability, 32 clinic patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were assessed twice, with 1 week between assessments. Retrospective data from 17 patients assessed before surgery and 18 months after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis were used to investigate the use of reliability in a clinical setting. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.92 for the SWT, 0.92 for the SSS, 0.83 for the OCS and 0.89 for the ODI. The mean percentage scores were 51 for the SSS, 45 for the OCS, and 40 for the ODI. To achieve 95% certainty of change between assessments for a single patient, the SSS would need to change by 15, the OCS by 20, and the ODI by 16. The mean SWT was 150 m, with a change of 76 m required for 95% confidence. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for the SSS, 0.90 for the OCS, and 0.89 for the ODI. The change in ODI correlated most strongly with patient satisfaction after surgery (rho = 0.80; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluctuations in a patient's symptoms result in wide individual confidence intervals. Performance on the SSS, OCS, and ODI questionnaires are broadly similar, the most precise being the condition-specific SSS. The SWT gives a snapshot of physical function, which is acceptable for group analysis. Use of the SWT for individual assessment after surgery is feasible.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

The reliability of the Low Back Outcome Score for back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective test-retest study was conducted to investigate both new and follow-up patients with low back pain presenting to an orthopedic surgeon specializing in back pain. OBJECTIVES: To further validate the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Low Back Outcome Score, and to compare these results with other condition-specific disability scales. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To be useful in clinical practice, health-specific questionnaires must demonstrate reliability and validity. Several disease-specific questionnaires for low back pain have been validated to different extents. METHODS: In this study, 102 new and 42 follow-up patients consecutively attending a consultant clinic completed the Low Back Outcome Score on their visit, then again after an interval of 1 week in postal form. This instrument also was completed by 230 patients presenting to a physiotherapist. RESULTS: A response rate of 90% was achieved for the postal questionnaire. A test of internal consistency conducted with the study sample achieved a Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.85. Overall agreement for test-retest reliability was 84%, and the reliability coefficient (K) reached a range of 0.51 to 0.86 (P < 0.05). A Bland/Altman plot was calculated, demonstrating that only 5% of patient scores change by more than 11.6 scale points between test and retest, which is not sufficient to change outcome categories. CONCLUSION: The Low Back Outcome Score appears to have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability for use in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke's new scoliosis classification system.

STUDY DESIGN: The assignment of idiopathic scoliosis curves to the curve types,1-6 to the lumbar spine modifier (A, B, or C), and to the sagittal thoracic modifier (-, N, +), as recently described by Lenke et al, was evaluated by five observers on two occasions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of Lenke's new system for classifying idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lenke et al recently introduced a new system for classifying idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Preoperative standing long cassette coronal and sagittal radiographs as well as side-bending radiographs of 51 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for idiopathic scoliosis were labeled with the Cobb angles for all the curves. The center sacral vertical line was marked as the bisection of the proximal sacrum perpendicular to the true horizontal line. Five observers independently assigned a curve type, a lumbar spine modifier, and a sagittal thoracic modifier to each curve following the guidelines as described by Lenke et al. Assignment of the curves was repeated 3 weeks later, with the curves presented in a different order. Kappa coefficients were used to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities. RESULTS: All five reviewers agreed on the overall classification in 21 (41%) of the 51 patients. A mean kappa value of 0.62 was determined for interobserver reliability, and a mean kappa of 0.73 for intraobserver reliability. Determination of an upper thoracic curve as structural or nonstructural and assignment of a lumbar spine modifier were the main reasons for disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: Lenke's new classification system is more reliable than the older King classification, but proper classification of high thoracic and lumbar curves seems to be difficult.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Reliability and validity of hip adduction strength to measure disease severity in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis was performed in patients with posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy (PPPP). The strength of adduction of the hips was measured and compared with the scores of commonly used disease severity measures of lumbopelvic pain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability and validity of using hip adduction strength as measure of disease severity in patients with PPPP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various tools are used to measure disease severity in PPPP; there is still a need for simple tests with high reliability and validity. METHODS: Intra- and intertester reliability of hip adduction strength measurement was assessed in two small groups of women with PPPP. Validity of hip adduction strength to measure disease severity was investigated in a group of 200 patients with PPPP by comparing the test scores with the medical history, scores on self-reported scales on disability, pain, and tiredness, pain provocation tests, and the active straight leg raise test. Responsiveness of hip adduction strength was assessed in a group of 75 patients with PPPP. Global impression of improvement, scored by the patient, was used as criterion standard. The responsiveness of the hip adduction strength was expressed as the standardized response mean and was compared with the responsiveness of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. RESULTS: The intratester reliability for measuring hip adduction strength and the intraclass correlation coefficient were both 0.79. The intertester reliability for measurement of adduction strength and the intraclass correlation coefficient were also both 0.79. Hip adduction strength correlated as expected with all disease severity measures. Responsiveness of the hip adduction strength was large (standardized response mean = 0.93) and slightly less than that of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (standardized response mean = 1.20). CONCLUSION: Hip adduction strength can be recommended to measure disease severity in PPPP, especially to describe groups of patients and to evaluate the course of the disease in groups as well as in individual patients. Decreased hip adduction strength appears to be caused by the inability to use the hip muscles rather than by weakness of the muscles.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Test-retest reliability of glenohumeral internal and external rotator strength.

OBJECTIVE: To establish test-retest reliability for a strength testing protocol of the glenohumeral internal and external rotator muscles using a KinCom (Chattanooga Group, Hixson, TN) isokinetic dynamometer. DESIGN: Prospective test-retest reliability study. SETTING: Rehabilitation research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen volunteers between the ages of 27 and 35 years participated in the study. Subjects had no history of traumatic shoulder injury and no overuse-based shoulder pain interfering with activity within the last 6 months. Nine of the 14 subjects were not participating in more than 6 hours weekly of arm-based sporting activities, while the remaining five subjects were involved in swim training at workout volumes of no greater than 3000 m per week. INTERVENTION: Subjects performed three test sessions of four maximal repetitions each of concentric and eccentric shoulder internal and external rotation bilaterally in a standardized sitting position. An average of 5.9 days occurred between consecutive test sessions (range, 2-21 days). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average torque data were collected for concentric and eccentric internal and external rotation tests bilaterally. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to compare the data across sessions. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were calculated to assess reliability between sessions. RESULTS: High test-retest reliability, ranging from 0.82 to 0.97, was demonstrated for all tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a reliable test protocol has been determined for shoulder internal and external rotation strength testing on the KinCom isokinetic dynamometer.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Reliability of three lumbar sagittal motion measurement methods: surface inclinometers.

Three surface methods for measuring lumbar sagittal motion (LSM) were tested for reliability. The three methods used were the Pleurimeter V double inclinometer, the carpenter double inclinometer, and the computerized single sensor inclinometer. In this study, 30 volunteers were examined independently by three occupational health professionals. Each volunteer rotated twice through three stations at which LSM was measured by each of the three methods. The intra- and interexaminer reliabilities in identifying the skin levels of T12 and S1 were acceptable, having intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) greater than or equal to 0.75. With a single exception, all ICC values for the intraexaminer reliability of LSM measurements fell below 0.90 (a clinically desirable level). The interexaminer reliability was poor, with all ICC values below 0.75. The largest source of measurement error was attributable to the examiner and its associated factors. We concluded that the intra- and interexaminer reliabilities varied greatly, limiting the clinical usefulness of the three surface methods.

Adult↗