Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,171 records · Page 65Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Low-dose calcitriol prevents the rise in 1,84-iPTH without affecting serum calcium and phosphate in patients with moderate renal failure (prospective placebo-controlled multicentre trial).

BACKGROUND: Higher doses of calcitriol are effective in lowering markedly elevated 1,84 PTH levels of patients with renal secondary hyperparathyroidism. It has not been established, however, whether prophylactic administration of low doses of calcitriol prevents an increase of 1,84 PTH without causing side-effects, i.e. hypercalcaemia, hypercalciuria, or hyperphosphataemia. STUDY DESIGN: We carried out a placebo-controlled, double-blind prospective multicentre trial over 12 months in 45 patients with mild to moderate renal failure. Criteria for inclusion were S-creatinine 1.4 mg/dl and 1,84 PTH > 6 pmol/l (normal 6). Calcitriol 0.125 microgram/day per os was compared with placebo. The patients received calcium carbonate per os if serum P exceeded 1.7 mmol/l. RESULTS: Baseline 1,84 iPTH concentrations were not significantly different, i.e. 14.0 pmol/l (6.7-63.3) on placebo vs 16.2 (6.85-82.0) on calcitriol. Intention to treat analysis revealed a significant difference of final 1,84 iPTH, i.e. 27.8 (4.2-68.5) on placebo vs 18.2 (4.45-75.5) on calcitriol. On post-hoc analysis the difference was even more pronounced at S-creatinine concentrations above 3 mg/dl. S-calcium, S-phosphate, and urinary excretion of calcium did not change significantly on either placebo or on calcitriol. There were no episodes of hypercalcaemia or hyperphosphataemia. There was no significant difference of final S-creatinine or change in S-creatinine between placebo and calcitriol. One patient on calcitriol and two on placebo progressed to terminal renal failure. Bone alkaline phosphatase as a non-invasive index of bone metabolism was not decreased to subnormal levels. CONCLUSION: The results document that a therapeutic window exists in patients with moderate renal failure and elevated of 1,84 iPTH, where low-dose calcitriol (0.125 microgram/day) prevents the increase in 1,84 iPTH without causing side-effects. This observation suggests that the parathyroid is more sensitive to calcitriol than intestine and bone.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Effect of magnesium sulphate in patients with unstable angina. A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

AIMS: Administration of intravenous magnesium sulphate has been shown to be protective during acute myocardial ischaemia and it may therefore have beneficial effects in unstable angina. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a 24-h infusion of magnesium in patients with unstable angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who presented with unstable angina with electrocardiographic changes were randomized to receive a 24-h intravenous infusion of magnesium or placebo within 12 h of admission. The primary endpoint was myocardial ischaemia, as assessed by 48 h Holter monitoring. Resting 12-lead ECGs, creatine kinase-MB release and urinary catecholamines were also assessed. Patients were followed for 1 month. Thirty-one patients received magnesium sulphate and 31 placebo. Baseline characteristics and extent of coronary disease were similar in both groups. On 48 h Holter monitoring, 14 patients (50%) had transient ST segment shifts in the magnesium group vs 12 patients (46%) in the placebo group. However, there were fewer ischaemic episodes in the magnesium group (51 vs 101, P < 0.001) and there was a trend towards an increase in the total duration of ischaemia in the placebo group compared to the magnesium group in the second 24 h (2176 min vs 719 min respectively, P = 0.08). Regression of T wave changes on the 24 h ECG occurred more frequently in patients who received magnesium compared to those treated with placebo (11 patients vs 0 patients respectively, P < 0.005). Creatine kinase-MB release was significantly less at 6 and 24 h in patients who received magnesium compared to those treated with placebo. Catecholamine excretion was lower in patients treated with magnesium than in those treated with placebo (adrenaline: 1.05 +/- 0.16 vs 1.61 +/- 0.32 ng.mmol-1 creatinine; noradrenaline: 9.99 +/- 1.82 vs 18.48 +/- 2.41 ng.mmol-1 creatinine respectively in the first 12 h sample, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous magnesium reduces ischaemic ECG changes, creatine kinase-MB release and urinary catecholamine excretion in the acute phase of unstable angina. Thus, magnesium may be a beneficial additional therapy for these patients. Further studies are required to confirm these finding.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

A prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of ultrasound in the physiotherapy treatment of shoulder pain.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of manual therapy and ultrasound (US) with manual therapy and placebo ultrasound (placebo US) in the treatment of new episodes of unilateral shoulder pain referred for physiotherapy. METHODS: In a multicentre, double blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial, participants were recruited with a clinical diagnosis of unilateral shoulder pain from nine primary care physiotherapy departments in Birmingham, UK. Recruitment took place from January 1999 to September 2001. Participants were 18 yrs old and above. Participants all received advice and home exercises and were randomized to additionally receive manual therapy plus US or manual therapy plus placebo US. The primary outcome measure was the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ-UK). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: A total of 221 participants (mean age 56 yrs) were recruited. 113 participants were randomized to US and 108 to placebo US. There was 76% follow up at 6 weeks and 71% at 6 months. The mean (95% CI) reduction in SDQ scores at 6 weeks was 17 points (13-26) for US and 13 points (9-17) for placebo US (P = 0.06). There were no statistically significant differences at the 5% level in mean changes between groups at any of the time points. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of US was not superior to placebo US when used as part of a package of physiotherapy in the short-term management of shoulder pain. This has important implications for physiotherapy practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Zopiclone and nitrazepam: a multicenter placebo controlled comparative study of efficacy and tolerance in insomniac patients in general practice.

The efficacy and tolerance of zopiclone were compared with nitrazepam and placebo in a multicenter double-blind parallel-group study in insomniac patients. Following a 7-day placebo washout period, 99 patients (age range 20 to 69 years) received oral capsules of 7.5 mg zopiclone or 5 mg nitrazepam or placebo for 2 weeks. During the fourth week all patients received placebo treatment. Sleep assessments by the patients showed that, compared with placebo, zopiclone and nitrazepam improved all sleep measures of efficacy from the first night and that effectiveness was maintained throughout treatment. The physicians global assessment of efficacy also favored zopiclone and nitrazepam over placebo treatment. Subjective morning drowsiness during treatment was significantly less for zopiclone than for either nitrazepam or placebo and represents a clear advantage for ambulatory patients. No rebound insomnia was evident during a 7 day post-treatment withdrawal period for either zopiclone or nitrazepam. Tolerance was good for all treatments.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A double-blind study in healthy volunteers to assess the effects on sleep of pregabalin compared with alprazolam and placebo.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of pregabalin compared with alprazolam and placebo on aspects of sleep in healthy volunteers. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, 3-way crossover. SETTING: Single research center. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Healthy adult (12 men) volunteers (N=24) received oral pregabalin 150 mg t.i.d., alprazolam 1 mg t.i.d., and placebo t.i.d. for 3 days. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Objective sleep was measured by an 8-channel polysomnograph; subjective sleep was measured using the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire. Compared with placebo, pregabalin significantly increased slow-wave sleep both as a proportion of the total sleep period and the duration of stage 4 sleep. Alprazolam significantly reduced slow-wave sleep. Pregabalin and alprazolam produced modest, but significant, reductions in sleep-onset latency compared with placebo. Rapid eye movement sleep latency after pregabalin was no different than placebo but was significantly shorter than that found with alprazolam. Although there were no differences between the active treatments, both pregabalin and alprazolam reduced rapid eye movement sleep as a proportion of the total sleep period compared with placebo. Pregabalin also significantly reduced the number of awakenings of more than 1 minute in duration. Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire ratings of the ease of getting to sleep and the perceived quality of sleep were significantly improved following both active treatments, and ratings of behavior following awakening were significantly impaired by both drug treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin appears to have an effect on sleep and sleep architecture that distinguishes it from benzodiazepines. Enhancement of slow-wave sleep is intriguing, since reductions in slow-wave sleep have frequently been reported in fibromyalgia and general anxiety disorder.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Effect of tiagabine on sleep in elderly subjects with primary insomnia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SUBJECT OBJECTIVE: This study further evaluated the effects of tiagabine on sleep in elderly subjects with primary insomnia. METHODS: Elderly subjects (aged 65-85 years) meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for primary insomnia were randomly assigned to receive tiagabine 2, 4, 6, or 8 mg or placebo on 2 consecutive nights. Efficacy was assessed using standard polysomnography and a postsleep questionnaire. Additional assessments included the Assessment of Daily Functioning, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (for residual effects), and visual analog scale (for sleepiness/alertness). RESULTS: A total of 207 subjects were randomly assigned to study medication (tiagabine: 2 mg, n = 43; 4 mg, n = 38; 6 mg, n = 45; 8 mg, n = 43; placebo, n = 38). Tiagabine did not significantly effect wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, or total sleep time compared with placebo (P > .05). Significant increases in Stage 3+4 sleep (i.e., slow-wave sleep) were found for tiagabine 4, 6, and 8 mg versus placebo, with a corresponding significant decrease in Stage 1 sleep (P < .05). At 6 and 8 mg, tiagabine also significantly reduced the number of awakenings and increased the ratio of Stage 3+4/(Stage 1 +wake after sleep onset). In general, there were no significant effects on subjects' ratings of sleep or daily functioning with tiagabine 2, 4, and 6 mg versus placebo. These 3 doses had tolerability profiles comparable with that of placebo and were not associated with significant residual effects or reduced alertness. The 8-mg dose, however, significantly decreased subjective total sleep time and refreshing quality of sleep, as well as daily functioning. This dose was associated with troublesome adverse events, significant residual effects, and reduced alertness. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly subjects with primary insomnia, tiagabine did not have a significant effect on wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, total sleep time, or the subjective rating of sleep. Tiagabine 4, 6, and 8 mg significantly increased slow-wave sleep, with a corresponding significant decrease in Stage 1 sleep. Tiagabine was generally well tolerated, with doses of less than 6 mg having tolerability profiles generally similar to that of placebo. The 8-mg dose, however, was associated with troublesome adverse events, residual effects, and reduced alertness.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Vomiting after adenotonsillectomy in children: a comparison of ondansetron, dimenhydrinate, and placebo.

UNLABELLED: We compared the effectiveness of ondansetron, dimenhydrinate, and placebo for the prevention of postoperative vomiting in children after adenotonsillectomy. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 74 children, 2-10 yr of age scheduled for adenotonsillectomy as outpatients were given a single i.v. dose of ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg, n = 26), dimenhydrinate (0.5 mg/kg, n = 25), or placebo (saline, n = 23) at induction of anesthesia. The incidence of retching and vomiting (POV) and side effects observed 24 h after surgery were recorded. Demographic data were similar among the three groups. The 24-h incidence of POV was 42%, 79%, and 82% in the ondansetron, dimenhydrinate, and placebo groups, respectively (ondansetron compared with dimenhydrinate [P < 0.02] or placebo [P < 0.01]). The study was stopped after two children vomited large volumes of bloody fluid 9 and 22 h after surgery without previous signs of occult bleeding. Both children had received ondansetron. We conclude that ondansetron is superior to dimenhydrinate or placebo for the prevention of POV after adenotonsillectomy in children. Antiemetics may mask the signs of bleeding after adenotonsillectomy. IMPLICATIONS: I.v. ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg) is more effective than both dimenhydrinate and placebo in preventing vomiting after adenotonsillectomy in healthy children. However, antiemetics may also mask the presence of blood in the stomach by preventing vomiting, and this should be appreciated when adenotonsillectomy is performed on an outpatient basis.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1999

Patient-controlled antiemesis: a randomized, double-blind comparison of two doses of propofol versus placebo.

BACKGROUND: The role of propofol for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is not well established. This study determines the efficacy of small doses of propofol administered by patient-controlled device for the treatment of PONV. METHODS: Patients presenting for ambulatory surgery received a standardized general anesthetic. Those who experienced significant nausea or emesis within 1 h of arrival in the recovery room were randomized to receive repeated doses of propofol 20 mg (P-20), propofol 40 mg (P-40), or intralipid (placebo) on demand. Study medications (in equal volumes) were administered with a patient-controlled delivery device for 2 h. A lockout interval of 5 min between doses was used. The following parameters were assessed: nausea, vomiting, rescue antiemetic use, recovery profile, study drug administration history, and satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients participated in the study. Patient demographics were similar. The average nausea score for a patient in the P-20 and P-40 groups was 25% and 29% less, respectively, compared with placebo during the study period (P < 0.05). This difference was apparent 15 min after initiation of therapy. More placebo patients vomited (P-20, 12%; P-40, 23%; placebo, 56%; P = 0.003) and needed rescue antiemetics (P-20, 17%; P-40, 23%; placebo, 70%; P = 0.001) compared with treatment groups. Sedation scores were similar between groups. Propofol-treated patients had shorter stays in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU; P-20, 131+/-35 min [mean +/- SD]; P-40, 141+/-34 min; placebo, 191+/-92 min; P = 0.005) and higher satisfaction with their control of PONV than placebo (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is effective in managing PONV with shorter PACU stay and great degree of patient satisfaction. There were two episodes of oversedation in the P-40 group. Hence, propofol at a demand dose of 20 mg seems more appropriate.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effect of erythromycin on gastric motility in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To document the action of erythromycin on gastric emptying and motility in mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: Crossover, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: General intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Ten patients, mechanically ventilated, in a stable hemodynamic condition. INTERVENTIONS: Erythromycin (200 mg i.v. over 30 mins) and placebo were infused at mid-morning, on two consecutive days, in a random order. Pressure changes in the gastric antrum were recorded by means of a multi-lumen manometric tube (perfused catheter technique) over a period of 300 mins, beginning with the institution of the erythromycin or placebo infusion. Gastric emptying was simultaneously assessed by the kinetics of the absorption of acetaminophen delivered into the stomach (1 g with 20 mL of water) immediately before the infusion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Motility was quantified by determining the number of contractions, the amplitude of contractions, and the Motility Index (Motility Index = natural logarithm [sum of amplitude x number of contractions] + 1). Comparison between placebo and erythromycin was made for the first hour after the infusion and for the whole recording session. The maximal acetaminophen concentration, the time to reach the peak acetaminophen concentration, and the area under the concentration-time curve at 60 mins were obtained from serial determinations of plasma acetaminophen concentrations. Compared with placebo, the mean number of contractions (104 +/- 34 vs. 5 +/- 8; p = .003), the mean amplitude of contractions (52 +/- 16 vs. 20 +/- 17 mm Hg; p = .005), and the Motility Index (13.06 +/- 0.95 vs. 4.45 +/- 3.54; p = .004) were significantly increased during the first hour after erythromycin infusion compared with placebo. Number of contractions (p = .017) and Motility Index (p < .001) after erythromycin infusion remained significantly higher when values throughout the whole recording session were considered. The following data were noted after erythromycin was infused: a) the time to reach the peak acetaminophen concentration was shorter (32 +/- 8 vs. 171 +/- 93 mins; p = .007); b) the maximal acetaminophen concentration was higher (22.09 +/- 6.23 vs. 5.38 +/- 3.80 micrograms/mL; p = .007); and c) the area under the concentration-time curve at 60 mins increased markedly (730 +/- 269 vs. 72 +/- 42 micrograms/min/mL; p = .002) as compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: In mechanically ventilated patients, intravenous erythromycin (200 mg over 30 mins) increases indices of antral motility and accelerates gastric emptying as assessed by the kinetics of acetaminophen absorption.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1998

Confirmatory platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist trial in patients with severe gram-negative bacterial sepsis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. BN 52021 Sepsis Investigator Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of using natural platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist (PAFra), BN 52021, to treat patients with severe Gram-negative bacterial sepsis. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Fifty-nine academic medical center intensive care units in Europe. PATIENTS: Six hundred nine patients with severe sepsis, suspected to be related to Gram-negative bacterial infection, who received PAFra or placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either a dose of PAFra (120 mg iv) every 12 hrs over a 4-day period or placebo over a 4-day period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients were well matched at study entry for severity of illness and for risk factors known to influence the outcome of sepsis. Among all randomized patients, the 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 49% (152/308) in the placebo group, and 47% (140/300) in the PAFra group (p=.50). When analyzed on the basis of the previously defined target population, the 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 50% (115/232) in the placebo group and 44% (94/212) in the PAFra group, yielding a 12% reduction in mortality rate (p=.29). In patients with documented infection involving other organisms, there was no difference between treated and placebo groups. When the outcomes of organ dysfunctions were examined in the overall population and in the documented Gram-negative bacterial infection population, the number of patients who resolved hepatic dysfunction tended to be higher in the treated group than in the placebo group (p=.06). The number of adverse events reported were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-day administration of the studied PAFra (BN 52021) failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the mortality rate of patients with severe sepsis suspected to be related to Gram-negative bacterial infection. If PAFra treatment has any therapeutic activity in severe Gram-negative bacterial sepsis, the incremental benefits are small and will be difficult to demonstrate in a patient population as defined by this clinical trial.

APACHE↗
PubMed2002

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of lisofylline for early treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the administration of lisofylline (1-[5R-hydroxyhexyl]-3,7-dimethylxanthine) would decrease mortality in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Intensive care units at 21 hospitals at the ten centers constituting the ARDS Clinical Trials Network. PATIENTS: A total of 235 patients who met eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study (116 into the lisofylline group, 119 into the placebo group). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either lisofylline or placebo. The dose of lisofylline was 3 mg/kg with a maximum dose of 300 mg intravenously every 6 hrs. The intravenous solution of study drug was administered over 10 mins every 6 hrs. Dosing was continued for 20 days or until the patient achieved 48 hrs of unassisted breathing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The trial was stopped by the Data Safety Monitoring Board for futility at the first scheduled interim analysis. The patient groups had similar characteristics at enrollment. No significant safety concerns were associated with lisofylline therapy. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of patients who had died at 28 days (31.9% lisofylline vs. 24.7% placebo, p = .215). There was no significant difference between the lisofylline and placebo groups in terms of resolution of organ failures, ventilator-free days, infection-related deaths, or development of serious infection during the 28-day study period. The median number of organ failure-free days for the five nonpulmonary organ failures examined (cardiovascular, central nervous system, coagulation, hepatic, and renal) was not different between the lisofylline and placebo groups. Although lisofylline has been reported to decrease circulating free fatty acid levels, we did not find any such treatment effect compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no evidence that lisofylline had beneficial effects in the treatment of established ALI/ARDS.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2002

Fluoxetine for acute treatment of depression in children and adolescents: a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This report presents results from the acute treatment phase of a clinical trial designed to confirm efficacy of a fixed dose of 20 mg of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: After a 3-week screening period, 122 children and 97 adolescents with MDD ( ) were randomly assigned to placebo or fluoxetine. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, fluoxetine-treated patients received fluoxetine 10 mg/day for 1 week, then fluoxetine 20 mg/day for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Fluoxetine was associated with greater mean improvement in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) score than placebo after 1 week ( <.05) and throughout the study period. Significantly more fluoxetine-treated patients (41%) met the prospectively defined criteria for remission than did placebo-treated patients (20%) ( <.01). More fluoxetine- (65%) than placebo-treated (53%) patients met the prospectively defined response criterion of > or =30% decrease in CDRS-R score, but this difference was not significant ( =.093). Significantly more fluoxetine-than placebo-treated patients completed acute treatment ( =.001). There were no significant differences between treatment groups in discontinuations due to adverse events ( =.408). CONCLUSION: Fluoxetine 20 mg daily appears to be well tolerated and effective for acute treatment of MDD in child and adolescent outpatients. Fluoxetine is the only antidepressant that has demonstrated efficacy in two placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials of pediatric depression.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a CCK-B receptor antagonist, CI-988, in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized study assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a novel CCK-B antagonist CI-988 in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Patients received placebo or CI-988 (300 mg/day, thrice daily) for 4 weeks. Patients with a primary diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-III-R criteria were randomized. The study design included a 1- to 2-week single-blind placebo baseline phase, followed by a 4-week double-blind treatment phase. Efficacy was measured weekly by Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impressions of Severity and Change, UCLA-Multi Dimensional Anxiety Scale, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Patients were also evaluated to determine whether they met criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) at screening and were evaluated with a gastrointestinal visual analog scale at each visit. Eighty-eight patients were randomized to CI-988 (N = 45) and placebo (N = 43) at three centers. CI-988 did not demonstrate an anxiolytic effect superior to placebo in this clinical trial. There was no significant difference in mean change in HAM-A total between placebo (-7.73) and CI-988 (-8.64). However, a significant treatment-by-center interaction and a highly variable placebo response rate among the three centers limit the interpretation of the results. CI-988 did not have an effect on symptoms of IBS other than diarrhea, which worsened in patients with IBS. Other than a higher incidence of some gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, dyspepsia, flatulence, and nausea), CI-988 was well tolerated. Results suggest that testing higher oral doses of CI-988 may be warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Opipramol for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled trial including an alprazolam-treated group.

Opipramol, a drug widely prescribed in Germany, is a tricyclic compound with no reuptake-inhibiting properties. However, it has pronounced D2-, 5-HT2-, and H1-blocking potential and high affinity to sigma receptors (sigma-1 and sigma-2). In early controlled trials, anxiolytic effects were revealed. However, those studies were performed before the concept of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was established. Because of the interesting receptor-binding profile and promising results of the early clinical trials, the authors performed a state-of-the-art placebo-controlled trial using alprazolam as an active control. Three hundred seven outpatients with GAD were included. After a 7-day single-blind placebo washout, patients were randomly assigned to receive either opipramol (final dose, 200 mg/day), alprazolam (2 mg/day), or placebo and were treated for 28 days. The efficacy of both active compounds was higher than the effects with placebo treatment. There were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, according to the analysis of covariance) in the main outcome criterion (baseline-adjusted final means of an intent-to-treat analysis of the total scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety) and in secondary efficacy parameters, with global improvement of 47% for placebo and significantly more for opipramol (63%) and alprazolam (64%). Regarding safety and tolerability, no substantial differences in the number of adverse events observed between treatment groups were obvious. Sedation seemed more pronounced with alprazolam treatment than with opipramol or placebo. In this trial, it was demonstrated for the first time that opipramol, a strong but nonselective sigma site ligand, possesses anxiolytic efficacy superior to placebo in the treatment of GAD.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Fluoxetine in social phobia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

The objective of the study was to examine the efficacy of fluoxetine in social phobia. Sixty subjects were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of double-blind therapy with either fluoxetine or placebo. Dose was fixed at 20 mg for fluoxetine during the first 8 weeks of double-blind treatment; during the final 6 weeks, the dose could be increased every two weeks by 20 mg to a maximum of 60 mg/day. An intentto-treat analysis was used. A significant change from baseline to endpoint was found for both fluoxetine and placebo on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. However, no significant difference was found between fluoxetine and placebo. The change for fluoxetine was somewhat lower than that found with other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, whereas the placebo response was greater. Fluoxetine failed to separate from placebo in this trial. It is unknown whether a larger dose for longer duration would have yielded separation from placebo. A higher than usual placebo response rate was found.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Acute dysphoric mania: treatment response to olanzapine versus placebo.

A substantial number of patients with mania have significant concomitant depressive features, and they may respond differently to mood stabilizers than patients with pure mania. This post-hoc analysis explored the response characteristics of olanzapine versus placebo in bipolar I manic patients with dysphoric and nondysphoric mania (differentiated by baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D] score of >20). Two similar, double-blind, randomized trials comparing olanzapine, 5-20 mg, to placebo were pooled for these analyses (N = 246). Mean changes in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) and HAM-D scores during 3 weeks of treatment were examined. Twenty-eight percent of patients had dysphoric mania (olanzapine, n = 33; placebo, n = 35). Among these patients, olanzapine-treated patients had greater improvement within 1 week than did placebo-treated patients on both mania ratings (Y-MRS: -9.7 vs. -3.0 points; = 0.011) and depressive symptom ratings (HAM-D: -9.9 vs. -5.4 points; = 0.025). Among those manic subjects without prominent depressive symptoms (olanzapine, n = 91; placebo, n = 87), mean Y-MRS improvement from baseline to endpoint with olanzapine (-11.5 points) versus placebo (-6.13 points) was comparable to the improvement seen with olanzapine versus placebo in the dysphoric mania subgroup ( = 0.476, test of interaction). In acutely ill manic patients with significant depressive symptoms, olanzapine demonstrated a broad spectrum of efficacy, effectively treating both manic and depressive symptoms. The magnitude of the antimanic response appears similar, regardless of baseline depressive features. Additional experience with putative mood stabilizers and atypical agents in mixed mania should include an exploration of their efficacy in treating both manic and depressive mood symptoms.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

A double-blind trial of fluoxetine, 20 mg, and placebo in out-patients with DSM-III-R major depression and melancholia.

As part of a study in which reduced rapid eye movement latency was used to predict treatment response, fluoxetine and placebo were compared in 89 outpatients with major depression with (n = 52) and without (n = 37) DSM-III-R melancholia, to determine whether the presence or absence of melancholia predicted antidepressant and/or placebo response. Following a 2-week, single-blind placebo lead-in, men and women were assigned by random allocation to double-blind fluoxetine, 20 mg/day, or placebo for 8 weeks. Fluoxetine was statistically significantly superior to placebo in patients with melancholia (endpoint change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score, response rates and remission rates). A weekly analysis demonstrated statistical superiority of fluoxetine compared with placebo at week 3 and continuing for the remainder of the study. Fluoxetine was statistically significantly more likely to reduce suicidal ideation compared with placebo, using the MADRS item 10 (suicidal ideation question).

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Moclobemide and imipramine in chronic depression (dysthymia): an international double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. International Collaborative Study Group.

An international, multicenter, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to determine the safety and antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide, a new reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, and imipramine in the treatment of dysthymia (DSM-III-R). A total of 315 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment in one of three groups (moclobemide, imipramine and placebo). Patients were male or female outpatients aged between 18 and 65 years meeting DSM-III-R criteria for dysthymia, primary type, with late or early onset. Of the patients in each group 85% completed the 8-week treatment period. The percentage of patients who no longer fulfilled DSM-III-R symptom criteria at treatment endpoint was significantly higher in the moclobemide (60%) and imipramine (49%) treatment groups than in the placebo group (22%). Differences to placebo were also statistically significant both for moclobemide and for imipramine on the other efficacy variables (i.e. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, final overall efficacy assessment, Clinical Global Impression and symptom check list self-rating). A significant superiority of moclobemide and imipramine over placebo was found in pure dysthymia and in double-depression, as well as in early and late onset subgroups. In early onset cases, moclobemide was significantly more effective than was imipramine on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Anticholinergic symptoms and sleepiness were significantly more frequent side effects on imipramine than on moclobemide or on placebo, and the investigators' final overall assessment of tolerability significantly favoured moclobemide over imipramine. This study demonstrates the efficacy of high dose moclobemide (mean dose 675 mg/day) and high dose imipramine (220 mg/day) against placebo in the treatment of dysthymia. Moclobemide was better tolerated than was imipramine.

Adolescent↗