Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Device Approval”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,171 records · Page 65Linked to original sources

Ethinylestradiol + norelgestromin: new preparation. Transdermal contraception: no tangible progress.

(1) The reference hormone-based contraceptive for women is an oral contraceptive combining ethinylestradiol (about 30 micrograms) and a well-known progestin such as levonorgestrel or norethisterone. (2) A transdermal contraceptive patch delivering 20 micrograms of ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms of norelgestromin over 24 hours, and designed to be left in place for a whole week, three weeks a month, has recently been marketed in France. (3) Norelgestromin is the active metabolite of norgestimate, which is already available in combined contraceptives but is less well evaluated than some other progestins. Norelgestromin is metabolised by the liver, notably into norgestrel. (4) The clinical evaluation dossier of the new transdermal contraceptive contains data from two comparative unblinded trials, one versus a triphasic combination of oral ethinylestradiol + levonorgestrel, and the other versus oral ethinyl estradiol (20 micrograms) + desogestrel. A third, non comparative trial offers weaker evidence. These three trials included about 3300 women in total, and lasted between 6 and 13 cycles. The patch was about as effective as the comparator contraceptives. (5) In the three main clinical trials, 4.7% of patches had to be replaced because they became unstuck, either completely (1.8%) or partially (2.9%). (6) More women dropped out of the groups using patches (19.9% of the patch group compared with 14.5% of the group taking oral contraceptives in one trial, 29.6% versus 24.3% in the other trial). Women using the patch were more likely than other women to stop their treatment because of adverse events (about 12% versus 5%). (7) Breast discomfort, breast tenderness or pain were reported by 22% of women using the patches and by 9% and 6% of women in the two comparator groups. Women using the patches had slightly longer menstrual periods (5.6 days versus 4.7 days). Reactions at the patch site were reported by 17% of women. (8) There is no evidence that the patch is any less likely than reference oral contraceptives to cause thromboembolism. The true thromboembolic risk associated with the new patches is unknown. (9) Used patches still contain large amounts of active substances, and must be placed in sachets (provided in the packet) and taken to a pharmacy for disposal. (10) In practice, the reference combined contraceptive for women is still oral ethinylestradiol (about 30 micrograms) plus a well-known progestin such as levonorgestrel or norethisterone. Ethinylestradiol + norelgestromin patches offer women no real benefits: they are probably less convenient and may be less safe.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Subatomic turf wars. Molecular imaging holds the promise of personalized medicine, while pitting radiologists against oncologists, others over diagnostic role.

Molecular imaging is expanding radiologists' territory and holds the promise of personalizing treatment. But a turf war is looming over who has the diagnostic role-radiologists, oncologists or others. "We're talking about a whole new way of thinking in terms of diagnosing and treating diseases," David Rollo says.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Medical devices; clinical chemistry and clinical toxicology devices; drug metabolizing enzyme genotyping system. Final rule.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying drug metabolizing enzyme (DME) genotyping test systems into class II (special controls). The special control that will apply to the device is the guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Genotyping System." The agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is publishing a notice of availability of a guidance document that is the special control for this device.

Alleles↗