Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Compulsive Personality Disorder”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,171 records · Page 65Linked to original sources

Personality dysfunction among somatizing patients.

To examine the nature and extent of personality dysfunction related to somatization, the authors administered the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory to a series of somatizing and nonsomatizing patients in a general medicine clinic. A greater percentage of somatizers met criteria for one or more DSM-IV personality disorders, especially obsessive-compulsive disorder, than did control patients. Somatizers also differed from control patients with respect to self-defeating, depressive, and negativistic personality traits and scored higher on the dimension of neuroticism and lower on the dimension of agreeableness. In addition, initial and facultative somatizers showed more personality pathology than true somatizers. These findings suggest that certain personality disorders and traits contribute to somatization by way of increased symptom reporting and care-seeking behavior.

Adult↗

Long-term outcome and prognosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder with onset in childhood or adolescence.

The aim of the catch-up follow-up study is to describe the long-term outcome of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) with onset in childhood and adolescence. The psychiatric morbidity in adulthood including personality disorders was assessed and predictors in childhood for the course of obsessive-compulsive symptoms were examined. The total study group consisted of the entire patient population treated for OCD at our departments for child and adolescent psychiatry between 1980 and 1991. We reassessed 55 patients personally by way of structured interviews. The mean age of onset of OCD was 12.5 years and the mean follow-up time was 11.2 years. At the follow-up investigation 71% of the patients met the criteria for some form of psychiatric disorder, while 36% were still suffering from OCD. Of the patients with a present diagnosis of OCD 70% had at least one further clinical disorder (especially anxiety and affective disorders). The most frequent personality disorders diagnosed were obsessive-compulsive (25.5%), avoidant (21.8%), and paranoid (12.7%) personality disorders. In-patient treatment, terminating treatment against advice and tics in childhood or adolescence significantly correlated with more severe OC symptoms in adulthood.

Adolescent↗

Parental bonding instrument. Exploring for links between scores and obsessionality.

The view that those with obsessive compulsive disorder or obsessional personality have been exposed to overcontrolling and overcritical parenting is examined. Two measures of obsessionality (the Maudsley Obsessional-Compulsive Inventory and the Leyton Obsessionality Inventory) were completed by 344 nonclinical subjects. They also scored their parents on the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), a measure assessing perceived levels of parental care and overprotection, before and after controlling for levels of state depression, trait anxiety and neuroticism in the analyses. Those scoring as more obsessional returned higher PBI protection scale scores. Links with PBI care scale scores were less clear, essentially restricted to the Maudsley Inventory, and variably influenced by controlling other variables.

Adolescent↗

Personality types and hetero- versus auto-hypnosis.

The Multivariate Personality Inventory (MPI; Magaro & Smith, 1981), the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (HGSHS; Shor & Orne, 1962), and the Inventory of Self-Hypnosis (ISH; Shor, 1970) were used to investigate the relationship between personality style and hypnotic procedure in the determination of hypnotic susceptibility. On the basis of MPI scores, a normal college population was segregated into 5 personality styles: hysteric, manic, depressive, character disorder, and compulsive. The hysteric personality was found significantly more hypnotizable than the other personality types in the HGSHS induction context, whereas the compulsive personality was found significantly more hypnotizable in the ISH induction context. Results are discussed in terms of personality and situational factors in relation to previous hypnotic susceptibility research.

Female↗

The prevalence of personality disorders among those with eating disorders.

The genuine prevalence of personality disorders among those with eating disorders is unknown. However, in this paper, we summarize the existing data, with careful acknowledgment of our approach to interpretation as well as the limitations of previous studies. Our findings indicate that obsessive-compulsive personality is the most common personality disorder in restricting-type anorexia nervosa, while borderline personality is the most common personality disorder in binge-eating/purging type anorexia nervosa. Borderline personality is the most common personality disorder in bulimia nervosa, as well. In those with binge eating disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality is the most common personality disorder although, compared with the preceding eating disorder diagnoses, there are broader clusters of personality disorders represented in this group. We discuss the implications of these findings.

Journal Article↗

Adolescent attachment and psychopathology.

The relationships among attachment classification, psychopathology, and personality traits were examined in a group of 60 psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. The concordance of attachment classification was examined in 27 adolescent-mother pairs. Both adolescent and maternal attachment status were overwhelmingly insecure and were highly concordant. Adolescents showing a dismissing attachment organization were more likely to have a conduct or substance abuse disorder, narcissistic or antisocial personality disorder, and self-reported narcissistic, antisocial, and paranoid personality traits. Adolescents showing a preoccupied attachment organization were more likely to have an affective disorder, obsessive-compulsive, histrionic, borderline or schizotypal personality disorder, and self-reported avoidant, anxious, and dysthymic personality traits. The results support a model of development of psychopathology based partially on relational experiences with parents.

Adolescent↗

[Psychiatric disorders during adolescence (author's transl)].

The psychopathology of adolescence shows three areas of dysfunction: 1. maturity deficits with an attitude of protest, loss of motivations, conversion symptomatology, 2. hypochondriac symptoms, obsessive-compulsive features, dysphorias, intellectual-physical handicaps, 3. antisocial behaviour, delinquency, neglect, addiction. 3. different courses can be distinguished longitudinally: 1. a double peak course with a disorder during childhood and adolescence with antisocial behavior, personality disorders and neurotic developments, 2. disorders during childhood which improve later (enuresis, encopresis, tics), 3. psychosis, maturity crisis, depressive reactions, obsessive compulsive syndromes.

Adolescent↗

Effect of axis II diagnoses on treatment outcome with clomipramine in 55 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

We used the Structured Interview for DSM-III Personality Disorders to diagnose DSM-III personality disorders systematically in 55 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder in the active-treatment cell of a controlled trial of clomipramine hydrochloride. Patients with a cluster A personality disorder had significantly higher obsessive-compulsive disorder severity scores at baseline, and the number of personality disorders was strongly related to baseline severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms. At the conclusion of the 12-week study, we found no significant difference in treatment outcome with clomipramine between those patients with at least one personality disorder and those with no personality disorders. However, the presence of schizotypal, borderline, and avoidant personality disorders, along with total number of personality disorders, did predict poorer treatment outcome. These variables were strongly related to having at least one cluster A personality disorder diagnosis, which was also a strong predictor of poorer outcome. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Adult↗

The comorbidity of DSM-III-R personality disorders in somatization disorder.

In order to understand psychiatric factors that complicate the medical management of somatizing patients, 94 subjects with known somatization disorder (SD) were evaluated for 13 personality disorders with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders. Referred from multiple primary care settings, the patient sample was predominantly female (85%), married (67%), high school graduates (64%), and had a mean age of 43. Structured interviews documented that 23.4% of SD patients had one personality disorder, and 37.2% had two or more disorders. The four most frequently identified personality disorders were avoidance 26.7%, paranoia 21.3%, self-defeating 19.1%, and obsessive-compulsive 17.1%. Interestingly histrionic personality disorder was identified in only 12.8% of the sample and antisocial personality disorder in 7.4%. In making the diagnosis of SD, health care providers need to avoid the common clinical impression that histrionic behavior often accompanies the disorder. Further research with SD patients is needed to examine the relationship of co-occurring personality disorders to symptom recurrence, health care utilization, and readiness for psychiatric referral.

Adult↗

Personality profiles in patients with eating disorders.

The present review focused on the personality profiles of patients with eating disorders. Studies using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorder showed high rates of diagnostic co-occurrence between eating disorders and personality disorders. The most commonly observed were histrionic, obsessive-compulsive, avoidant, dependent and borderline personality disorders. Studies using the Cloninger's personality theory suggested that high Harm Avoidance might be relevant to the pathology of anorexia nervosa and high Novelty Seeking and Harm Avoidance to bulimia nervosa. Moreover, high Self-Directedness was suggested to be associated with favorable outcome in bulimia nervosa. The assessment of personality in a cross-sectional study, however, might be influenced by the various states of the illness. Therefore, a sophisticated longitudinal study will be required to advance this area of research.

Anorexia Nervosa↗

[Obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia. A critical review].

Co-occurrence of psychotic and obsessive-compulsive symptoms has been recognized for decades. This paper reviews published reports from five perspectives: schizophrenia with obsessive-compulsive symptoms, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) with psychotic symptoms, schizophrenia-spectrum-personality disorder with obsessive-compulsive symptoms, obsessive-compulsive symptoms induced by atypical antipsychotics and similarities of functional neural circuits theory in OCD and schizophrenia. A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify relevant articles from 1960 until 2004. Only a few systematic data that explore the nature and significance of such occurrence have been published. More recent studies using systematic diagnostic criteria suggest that the rate of occurrence may not be rare at all. In schizophrenia, a similar dorsolateral prefrontal cortex circuit shares anatomic substrates similar to those of the OCD orbitofrontal circuit. Exploring the interface of schizophrenic and obsessive-compulsive symptoms is important for diagnostic clarity and could have important implications for treatment and long-term prognosis. The review emphasizes the different origins and natural course of co-occurrence of schizophrenic and obsessive-compulsive symptoms and their various outcome under atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). Further double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled investigations in larger cohorts of schizophrenic and OCD patients are needed in order to identify a schizo-obsessive schizophrenia and a schizotypal subtype of obsessive compulsive disorder and to substantiate the algorithm for treatment.

Humans↗

Raising doubts about claims of malingering: implications of relationships between MCMI-II and MMPI-2 performances.

Test results from 90 personal injury claimants were used to explore the relationship between personality disorders (Dependent, Histrionic, Compulsive, Schizoid, Schizotypal, Paranoid, Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, Avoidant, and Passive-Aggressive) as assessed by the MCMI-II and response style measured by MMPI-2 validity scales (F, K, L, F-K, O-S, Es, and FBS). With the exception of the Dependent and Narcissistic scales, all personality disorder scales were found to have a significant relationship with validity indicators in the direction of faking bad. These results suggest that the presence of characterological factors (i.e., a personality disorder), rather than malingering, contributes to exaggerated results in a forensic setting. Implications for future research are addressed.

Adult↗

Comorbidity of personality disorders with bipolar mood disorders.

The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of personality disorders in a group of outpatients with bipolar I disorder. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II) was administered to 90 bipolar outpatients who met the DSM-III-R criteria and 58 control subjects. Of the patients and controls, 47.7% and 15.5%, respectively, had at least one personality disorder. At least one personality disorder in clusters A, B, and C and obsessive-compulsive, paranoid, histrionic, and borderline personality disorders were significantly more prevalent in bipolars. Suicide attempts were more frequent in patients with a history of personality disorder.

Adult↗

Personality characteristics associated with psychological reactance.

This study compared six different personality disorders on level of psychological reactance. Eighty clients met criteria for inclusion in one of six personality disorder groups, including passive-aggressive, dependent, personality disorder NOS (not otherwise specified), no personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive, and borderline. Instruments included the Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS) and the Questionnaire for the Measurement of Psychological Reactance (QMPR). Four one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted on the scales and subscales of the two reactance measures. All four ANOVAs were significant, although post hoc tests indicated significant differences only among the more extreme groups. The personality disorders were generally ordered on reactance level according to predictions derived from the theory of separation-individuation.

Adult↗

[Preliminary studies of the structured diagnostic interview for personality disorders: SCID II].

The aim of the study was to compare control subjects and consultant patients with the SCID II (interview and questionnaire), then to compare clinical diagnosis with the SCID II (interview and questionnaire). The preliminary study was carried out to assess the feasibility of the procedure. This appraisal was conducted with a group of patients (n = 26) and a control group (n = 16). Only the patients were diagnosed according to DSM IV criteria. The patients and the control group completed the Mini-Mult and the SCID II (questionnaire and interview). The two groups were matched on sex, age and educational level. The two groups were discriminated on all Mini-Mult scales but one: the internalization index. The results showed that the SCID questionnaire and the SCID interview differentiate the two groups. The SCID questionnaire showed high sensitivity in the group of patients. It is a more efficient instrument to screen control subjects except one personality disorder (obsessive-compulsive). The diagnostic agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the structured interview was poor. However our results are comparable to the other studies.

Adult↗

DSM-III-R co-morbidity in benzodiazepine dependence.

UNLABELLED: AIM, SAMPLE AND MEASURES: Co-morbidity has been shown to influence the clinical course of mental disorders. This paper describes DSM-III-R 1-month co-morbidity across axes I, II and III in a sample of 153 benzodiazepine dependents. All patients were evaluated through several in-depth clinical interviews across all five DSM-III-R axes. RESULTS: Extensive co-morbidity existed across three DSM-III-R axes. All patients had at least one diagnosis in axis I; 81 (52.9%) in axis II and 50 (32.7%) in axis III. The most prevalent diagnoses were: insomnia, anxiety disorders and affective disorders in axis I; obsessive-compulsive, histrionic and dependent personality disorders in axis II and rheumatological, neurological and cardiovascular disorders in axis III. CONCLUSIONS: There were no cases of benzodiazepine dependence appearing alone. There were associations within and between axes, suggesting potential predisposing factors and a sequential model for benzodiazepine dependence is proposed. The findings reinforce the need for exhaustive diagnostic evaluation of patients prior to prescribing benzodiazepine.

Adult↗