Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “generalization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources

General internal medicine at the crossroads of prosperity and despair: caring for patients with chronic diseases in an aging society.

During the past quarter century, general internal medicine has emerged as a vital discipline. In the realm of patient care, it is the integrating discipline par excellence. Ironically, as general internists face the challenge of integrating advances of dizzying speed and complexity, and as their clinical practice becomes increasingly effective, it has become much more difficult for them to earn a living. General internists find themselves at the crossroads of prosperity and despair. Although general medicine research leads the research agenda in many departments of medicine, it is particularly vulnerable. The necessary multidisciplinary "programmatic" infrastructure is expensive, and results often take many years to obtain, particularly in the study of chronic disease. The educational environment in many institutions is particularly difficult for general medicine, both because the current emphasis on technical skills obscures patients' and learners' real needs and because complex patients on general medicine services are now so ill and their turnover so rapid. General internal medicine and geriatrics are synergistic, especially in today's marketplace. A focus on geriatric medicine could help general medicine continue to flourish. General internists are ideally suited to the integrated care of elderly patients with multiple problems, research opportunities are enormous in the geriatric population, and the teaching of geriatrics requires a high level of generalist skills. Problems that plague current generalist practice have unique significance to older patients. Organizations that represent general internists would do well to join forces with many other advocacy groups, especially those representing the interests of elderly patients and geriatric medicine.

Chronic Disease↗

[Do general practitioners want to manage chronic hepatitis C and take part in hepatitis C health networks? A national survey].

OBJECTIVES: To assess information that general practitioners had on hepatitis C and on the hepatitis C network in hospitals and private practice. METHODOLOGY: A national telephone survey of 604 general practitioners was conducted between March 18 and 23, 1998. RESULTS: Screening and management of hepatitis C was important for 89% and 97% of general practitioners. Screening was performed in relation to the relative risk (IV drug users 89%, blood transfusion before 1991 88%). General practitioners wanted more information on treatment (54%), patient counselling (42%) and the potential risks of the disease (42%). Of 604 general practitioners, 6% were involved in a hepatitis C network, while 21% were involved in another network (drug users 9%, AIDS 8%). Of the 94% general practitioners who were not part of the network, 33% were willing to join a hepatitis C network. Only 56% were aware of a hepatitis C network (press article 30%, mailing 17% or local meeting 12%). The difficulties for the involvement of general practitioners were: lack of time, topics not adapted to daily practice and geographic constraints (74%), too few patients in their practice (52%), no need (38%), the idea itself of a network and lack of information (28%). CONCLUSION: General practitioners screen patients at risk of hepatitis C. They want to be better informed about treatment, patient counselling, and the potential risks of hepatitis C. They are less involved in hepatitis C networks than in other networks (drug, AIDS). However, one third of general practitioners would like to be involved in a hepatitis C network. These results could be useful for implementing post-graduate courses and general practitioner training.

Adult↗

Recruitment of UK-trained doctors into general practice: findings from national cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: In recent years there have been difficulties with recruitment in the United Kingdom (UK) to principalships in general practice. AIM: To compare recruitment trends in cohorts defined by year of qualification and to report attitudes of young doctors about the attractiveness of a career in general practice. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cohort studies. SETTING: UK medical qualifiers in the years 1974, 1977, 1983, 1988, 1993, and 1996. METHOD: Postal questionnaire surveys conductedfrom 1975 to 1999. RESULTS: Five years after qualification, 23.8% of 1993 qualifiers were in UK general practice, compared with 25.9% and 32.8% of 1988 and 1983 qualifiers respectively. Six per cent of responders in the 1993 cohort were general practitioner (GP) principals, compared with 10% of the 1988 cohort and 20% of the 1983 cohort. Ten years after qualification, 37.7% of 1988 qualifiers and 42.7% of 1983 qualifiers were in UK general practice. Older GPs had lower job satisfaction than their contemporaries in hospital practice, while younger GPs were more satisfied than younger hospital doctors with the time available for leisure. Although young doctors are less inclined to enter general practice nowadays, over haf of the 1996 qualifiers, when surveyed in 1999, actually regarded general practice as a more attractive career than hospital practice. CONCLUSION: Patterns of entry into and commitment to UK general practice are changing. Fewer young doctors are choosing and entering general practice and early commitment to full-time principalships is falling. The 1996 cohort, however, took an encouragingly positive view of the attractiveness of careers in general practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

A national census of Irish general practice training programme graduates 1990-1996.

We followed the career pathways of all graduates of Irish general practice training schemes between 1990 and 1996 inclusive, with specific reference to their current positions, ten year aspirations, perceived barriers to their ideal career and attitudes to out of hours work. A postal survey using a structured questionnaire was performed. Addresses were identified for 253 of the 266 graduates (95%). A total of two hundred and nine responses were received (84% of those with an identifiable address). 173 (83%) have remained in general practice; 90% in Ireland and 60% in the same health board of their training programme. The preferred career option for 79% was to be a general practice principal; this differed significantly between males (89%) and females (74%) (p=0.016). Being a single-handed general practitioner was the preferred option for 2%; 43% considered this unacceptable. A half would prefer to work in a country town; one third considered a rural location as unacceptable. 'Out of hours' commitment and availability of local posts were the most commonly perceived barriers to career progress (53% and 45% respectively). 26% were not prepared to do any out of hours work; this differed significantly between males (10%) and females (30%) (p<.001). 17% have permanently left a career in general practice. Female general practitioners were not significantly more likely than male general practitioners to have left (19% vs. 14%, p=0.3). The most common reason given for leaving general practice was other career interest (78%). The significant increase in female general practice graduates over the past twenty years is highlighted. The vast majority of these female graduates wished to be a principal in a group practice and were prepared to undertake out of hours work. There is also a mismatch between career aspirations and the present structure of general practice in Ireland. The urgent need for changes in health system organisation to ensure that these intentions can be fulfilled is emphasised.

Career Choice↗

The effect of emergency department policy change on Hutt district general practices.

AIM: To determine the impact of the new Hutt Hospital emergency care policy as perceived by general practitioners and measure the level of general practitioner emergency services provided. METHOD: Postal survey one year after policy instituted of Hutt district general practitioners. RESULTS: Sixty-three general practitioners replied (93% response). Eighty-one percent of general practitioners were in favour of the new policy or wanted it extended further, although 79% had noticed a slight increase in patient numbers. Most surgeries were less than 10 km from the hospital, 44% had one general practitioner, 38% had no practice nurse, 84% were staffed between 40-59 hours a week. No practice had staff on the premises between the night time hours of 8 pm and 8 am but all had after hours cover by telephone. Most practices were equipped to manage at least some emergency conditions: all had peak flow meters, 94% had nebulisers, 69% oxygen cylinders, and 47% had an ECG machine. Only two practices had slit lamps and plaster of paris facilities, and one a defibrillation machine. Almost all general practitioners suture wounds, strap ankles, and most treat fractures and pack noses. Seventy-five percent of general practitioners expressed a need for better communication with the Hutt Hospital emergency department. CONCLUSION: A general acceptance of the policy change by Hutt general practitioners although more research is needed to determine the impact of this change on patients.

Adult↗

[Assessment of suicidal behaviour in general practice].

AIM: To assess the prevalence of suicidal behavior (wish to die, suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts) and to determine the characteristics of suicide attempters in primary care, including screening for major mental disorders. METHOD: A Hungarian urban general practitioner's district with 1248 inhabitants was screened for suicidal behavior as well as for major mental disorders. All the patients (n=382) who visited their general practitioner within a two-week period were asked to participate. 277 patients completed the Prime-MD questionnaire, an easy-to-use diagnostic instrument developed for general practitioners to recognize the most common psychiatric disorders, like depressive (major depressive disorder, minor depressive disorder), anxiety (panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder), somatoform, eating and alcohol related disorders. Detailed data about suicidal thoughts and attempts were also collected by the structured questions of MINI-Plus diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Prevalence of suicide attempts in primary care was 2.9%. 9% of the patients had either suicidal thoughts or suicide attempts in the previous month. Suicidal patients were more ready to use psychotropic drugs, they assessed their health status more poorly, and had more mental symptoms than the control group (non-suicidal patients). 60% of suicidal patients and 11.5% of the investigated population had a current depressive episode. Beside depressive symptoms, anxiety disorders and alcohol problems were also more common among suicidal patients. The rate of previous psychiatric treatments was also higher in suicidal patients, who generally visited their general practitioners less frequently than non-suicidal patients. According to multivariate logistic regression, suicidal patients are more ready to take antidepressants, they tend to have more previous psychiatric treatments and suicidal attempts, and they visit their general practitioners less frequently and have a current depressive episode. CONCLUSION: Suicidal behavior and mental disorders are frequent in primary care. Since almost every tenth patient visiting their general practitioner has suicidal thoughts or depressive or anxiety disorder, the recognition of suicide risk and mental disorders is very important in primary care. As for preventing suicides, the diagnosing and treating of mental disorders -especially affective disorders- are very important for general practitioners. In addition to pharmacotherapy, psychotherapies are also important in treating patients in crisis situations, or with suicidal thoughts or depressive disorder. The modified Prime-MD questionnaire can be an effective, easy-to-use method in the hand of the general practitioners to identify suicidal risk and to recognize the most common mental disorders in the average population.

Adult↗

Acute myocardial infarction: an easy diagnosis in general practice?

In the imminent myocardial infarction Rotterdam (IMIR) study, contacts by patients with their general practitioners for symptoms of potential coronary artery disease were registered. Those who had acute myocardial infarction were diagnosed on the basis of the modified World Health Organization criteria, and those with this definite diagnosis were then compared with the initial diagnosis made by the general practitioner at the moment of contact without laboratory assistance.Of the 1,343 patients included in the study, 93 (seven per cent) had ;definite' acute myocardial infarction and another 37 (three per cent) had ;possible' acute myocardial infarction according to the diagnostic criteria used.At the time of contact with the general practitioner 41 (44 per cent) of the 93 patients with definite myocardial infarction were recognized as such by the general practitioner, while in another 31 (33 per cent) the general practitioner diagnosed ;imminent' myocardial infarction.Of the 1,213 patients free of acute myocardial infarction at the time, 40 (three per cent) were incorrectly diagnosed by the general practitioner as having ;acute' myocardial infarction.In the 22 patients who in fact had acute myocardial infarction but in whom the general practitioner did not make this diagnosis at the time, it was found that there was an absence of physical signs and, similarly, in patients who subsequently did not have infarction the presence of physical signs was related to a falsepositive general practitioner diagnosis of myocardial infarction.In view of the inaccuracy of the general practitioner's provisional diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, we believe that electrocardiogram and enzyme tests should be carried out systematically in all patients who present to general practitioners with symptoms of potential coronary artery disease. Laboratory support should be readily available and we support the idea of having a special diagnostic service.

Adult↗

Contribution of academic departments of general practice to undergraduate teaching, and their plans for curriculum development.

BACKGROUND: In 1991, the General Medical Council suggested the development of a new undergraduate curriculum, on a 'core plus electives' basis. The combination of National Health Service reforms and the rising profile of academic departments of general practice had led to a consideration of general practice as an alternative teaching environment. These departments now face escalating expectations from their medical schools of their ability to provide additional community based teaching. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the present contribution of academic departments of general practice to undergraduate teaching and their plans for curriculum development, including the introduction of community-based clinical skills teaching. METHOD: A questionnaire was circulated in June 1993 to all academic departments of general practice in the United Kingdom and Eire. RESULTS: Twenty seven out of 28 questionnaires were returned. Twenty two departments provided pre-clinical teaching and all provided a clinical practice attachment. Eight medical schools were organizing community-based clinical skills teaching, and in two this formed the basis for a community-based medical attachment. Eight planned to reduce the factual content of their curricula and introduce problem-based learning while nine were contemplating a 'core plus electives' option. Fourteen medical schools had primary care input in teaching basic clinical skills and an additional seven planned to introduce this. Problems encountered by the general practitioner tutors in teaching clinical skills included insufficient time and resources and poor self-esteem; they identified a need for good central and peripheral organization. CONCLUSION: Compared with a 1988 study, academic departments of general practice are increasingly involved in teaching both general practice and general medical skills at undergraduate level. Curriculum change is occurring rapidly, with an increasing trend towards community teaching; the implications for both academic departments and general practitioner tutors are discussed.

Curriculum↗

Roles of the general practitioner in different contexts.

The word ¿general practice¿ denotes different contents of work as we look at different contexts. General practitioners may provide first line care, function as secondary care providers at hospital level, take responsibility for the management of health care systems. These different roles can be seen as results from historical processes of division of work in the field of health care, which gave general practice its present shapes. During the first half of the 20th century, western general practitioners were gradually excluded from hospitals as well as from public health activities. When they started to react in order to increase their legitimacy they strived--with variable success--to gain recognition as curative first line care providers, as this had become the only place in the health care system they could claim for. They gradually defined their specificity in terms of polyvalence enabling them to deal with unselected problems, and in terms of global view allowing for adequate priority setting. In developing countries, the organisation of medical care was and remains influenced by western models. As in western countries, emphasis has been put on specialisation and hospital technology. General practice was not exported to developing countries: general practitioners appear rather as cheap substitutes for specialists. The most typical workplace for general practitioners in developing countries remains the rural hospital. But their role model refers to the hospital based specialist: they tend to focus on patient care for hospital users rather than on dynamising health care delivery to the whole community in the district. In urban areas, the recent expansion of (mostly private) first line medical care is also not specific to general practice and tends to be in favour of specialists. What is the common denominator to these different roles, if any? A possible answer lies in the primary health care approach. It allows to define the specificity of general practitioners in terms of multifactorial approach and global view on health and illness, which differentiates them from specialists. Whether they provide this care themselves or organise it at district level could be less important to their professional identity than the general attitudes and knowledge they rely on.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

[General practitioners' approach to urination disorders in men over the age of 50. A survey of 250 physicians in Brittany].

A questionnaire was set to 250 general practitioners in the Brittany region, to determine the impact of information campaigns concerning benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic cancer on their everyday approach to disorders of micturition in men over the age of 50 years. 225 questionnaires were interpretable. 75% of general practitioners systematically investigated the presence of disorders of micturition. In the presence of such symptoms, 76% of general practitioners conducted further investigations to exclude prostatic cancer. 89% of general practitioners performed first-line digital rectal examination, and 34% of them systematically performed this examination once a year. The investigations most frequently performed after digital rectal examination concerned the state of urine (50%) but only 30% of general practitioners used reagent dip-sticks and 43% ordered urine cultures. Other investigations consisted of transrectal ultrasonography (31%) an PSA assay (26%). 3% of PSA assays were ordered before digital rectal examination. Renal and vesical ultrasonography occupied 5th place, although distension of the upper urinary apparatus was a source of concern for 51% of general practitioners. In the presence of symptomatic BPH, general practitioners readily prescribed medical treatment (96%). They assessed the results of this treatment on the course of disorders of micturition (95%), digital rectal examination (91%), and PSA (50%). General practitioners are familiar with disorders of micturition after the age of 50 years. However, 25% of them do not systematically question patients about these symptoms. Digital rectal examination is now performed more frequently, although systematic examination of the prostate is rare (34%). PSA assay is not the doctor's first priority (3rd place in the list of examinations). Two examinations are rarely used and should be developed: reagent dip-sticks (30%) and renal and vesical ultrasonography (5th place). Only 4% of general practitioners did not prescribe any treatment in the case of uncomplicated BPH, which is not in line with current recommendations. There is certainly a need for better information of general practitioners, but this information is only valid when a consensus has been reached among urologists.

Age Factors↗

Links between mental health care professionals and general practices in England and Wales: the impact of GP fundholding.

BACKGROUND: Fundholding general practitioners are able to determine the type of contracts they place with providers of mental health care, and are able to employ some categories of mental health care professionals directly. The impact of this on the care of the mental health of patients in non-fundholding practices is not yet fully known. AIM: A survey was undertaken of 100 fundholding general practices and 100 similarly sized non-fundholding practices in order to investigate the changes in mental health provision made by general practitioners. METHODS: A sample of 100 fundholding general practices in England and Wales was randomly chosen from the list supplied by the Association of Fundholders and matched to a similarly randomly chosen sample of non-fundholding practices. Postal questionnaires were sent to the senior partner and to the practice manager in each practice. RESULTS: The number of mental health care professionals who are either employed by or attached to general practices, or who visit the general practice on a regular basis appears to have increased substantially since 1991. This increase was particularly marked in fundholding practices. The results suggest that general practitioners with specific links to particular mental health care providers were more satisfied with the service provided by the mental health care team, and more likely to increase referrals to that service in the last 2 years, than general practitioners without such links. There was little evidence to suggest that increasing the number of mental health care professionals in primary care had brought about a major reduction in referrals to psychiatrists. CONCLUSION: General practitioners, particularly fundholders, are increasing their links with mental health professionals, and community psychiatric nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists and counsellors are spending more time either based in general practice or visiting regularly. While the shift of resources to primary care, particularly to fundholders, may increase the treatment options available to patients with less severe illnesses, this may have the effect of reducing the services available for the long-term and severely mentally ill.

Community Mental Health Services↗

Stress among general practitioners and their spouses: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Although research has been carried out on stress in general practitioners, little is known about the stresses experienced by their spouses. AIM: This study was undertaken to identify specific pressures at work and at home experienced by general practitioners and their spouses and to highlight their coping strategies. METHOD: In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 general practitioners and their spouses in the north-west of England. RESULTS: The doctors' increased workload and decreased interest in their family are important stressors for the entire family unit. Other stressors include time pressure, out-of-hours on-call, lack of support and amount of paperwork. General practitioners work late in the surgery, bring work home and spend time away from home at meetings. Family life is constantly interrupted by telephone calls. Role conflict was one of the major sources of stress for women general practitioners. Doctors' wives expressed concern regarding their husbands' excessive commitment to work and problems with communication. CONCLUSION: Recent changes to contractual working conditions have caused general practitioners to focus their energies on their practice instead of paying attention to the needs of their family. Male general practitioners leave the bulk of responsibility for running the family and household to their wives, but women general practitioners appear to maintain domestic responsibility while spending as much time in medical practice as their male colleagues. This is only an exploratory study based on a small sample, and so the findings cannot be generalized; however, it provides in-depth information on stress among general practitioners and their spouses.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

General practitioner reaccreditation: use of performance indicators.

There has been increasing debate about reaccreditation of general practitioners over the last few years with contributions from the General Medical Services Committee, the Royal College of General Practitioners and the National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts. The implications of proposals in terms of cost, logistics and organization are discussed in this paper, in light of experience with the introduction of summative assessment for general practitioner registrars (trainees) and a programme of training practice visits in West Midlands Region. A model for reaccreditation for all general practitioners is proposed which is professionally led and sensitive to the needs of patients and health service managers. The basic proposition is that publicly owned family health services authority data could be used as initial performance indicators for professional competence. The model is dependent on the rebuttal of the null hypothesis: there is no link between the competence of a general practitioner and his or her achievements in the suggested performance indicators. If the performance indicators (educational commitments, prescribing data, health promotion activity and immunization targets, and service elements) can be shown to correlate with possession of the attributes for independent practice as defined by the General Medical Council, then a relatively inexpensive and simple system of reaccreditation could be envisaged. General practitioners who are recorded as achieving set performance indicator targets would be accorded automatic reaccreditation. Only substandard practitioners would be required to be assessed further by a visiting team of local general practitioner peers and, if appropriate, a remedial education strategy introduced. This method would complement the General Medical Council scheme for assessing an individual doctor's persistent poor performance, which could then be invoked as a last resort.

Accreditation↗

The biopsychosocial model of general practice: rhetoric or reality?

BACKGROUND: For more than 20 years, general practitioners have been encouraged to adopt a 'biopsychosocial' model of health care, that is, encompassing physical, psychological and social aspects. AIM: A study was undertaken to explore the extent to which general practitioners' views about the acceptable boundaries of their work are consistent with a biopsychosocial model. METHOD: A semi-structured postal questionnaire was sent to all 494 members of the Royal College of General Practitioners in Mersey Region who were general practitioner principals. The general practitioners were asked to list up to three topics presented by patients that they considered to be appropriate, and up to three topics that they considered to be inappropriate, to a general practitioner's knowledge and skills. The general practitioners were asked to rate, on a five-point scale of appropriateness, each of a list of 12 topics about which patients might have problems and present. Responses were analysed by sex and age of respondents. RESULTS: The response rate was 42%. Acute physical problems were most often listed appropriate by respondents, followed by chronic physical and psychological problems. The topics most often considered inappropriate were bureaucracy and social issues. Among the list of 12 specified topics, respondents considered terminal care and hypertension to be more appropriate than housing issues, spiritual worries, welfare rights or political issues. The sex of respondents did not relate to differences in results. Respondents aged 35 years and over generally considered topics presented by their patients to be more appropriate than did their younger colleagues. CONCLUSION: The general practitioner respondents in this study appeared to hold the view that general practitioners should work to a bio(psycho) rather than a biopsychosocial model of health care.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Characteristics of practices, general practitioners and patients related to levels of patients' satisfaction with consultations.

BACKGROUND: Despite interest in the relationship between patient satisfaction and consultation performance, there is little information about how other characteristics of general practitioners, practices and patients influence satisfaction with consultations. AIM: To identify characteristics of patients, practices and general practitioners that influence satisfaction with consultations. METHOD: In 1991-92, a consultation satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ) was administered to 75 patients attending each of the 126 general practitioners in 39 practices. Further questionnaires were used to collect information about the practice (such as total list size, training status, fundholding status and presence of a personal list system) and about the general practitioners (age, sex, whether vocationally trained, a trainer or a trainee, and the number of patients booked in the appointment system per hour). Stepwise multiple regression was undertaken to identify characteristics of patients, practices or general practitioners that influenced satisfaction. RESULTS: The mean of the response rates to the patient questionnaire for each general practitioner was 76.6%, with a standard deviation (SD) of 17.8. Practice characteristics associated with falls in satisfaction were an increasing total list size, the absence of a personal list system and its being a training practice. If more patients were booked in the appointment system per hour, satisfaction with the perceived length of consultations fell. Patient characteristics associated with falls in satisfaction were increased age and an increased proportion of male patients. The only characteristic of general practitioners associated with lower levels of satisfaction was increasing age. The sex of general practitioners did not influence satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study give further support to the importance of a personal service in determining patient satisfaction in general practice. General Practitioners need to review the organization of practices to ensure an acceptable balance between the requirements of modern clinical care and the wishes of patients. Future studies should take account of the many variables that can influence patient satisfaction.

Adult↗

[The contribution of general practice medicine to undergraduate medical education].

The Blueprint 1994. Objectives of undergraduate medical education, was issued in 1994 and has since been used as a guideline by the eight medical faculties in the Netherlands. This prompted a team of representatives of all eight Institutes for General Practice Medicine of the country to describe the contribution of general practice medicine to undergraduate medical education. The team was guided by two basic principles of general practice medicine, viz. general accessibility for all health problems at all stages and the continuous nature of the care. Out of the 180 general objectives of the Blueprint, 12 were selected of which the teaching should preferably be provided or coordinated by general practice medicine. Out of the approximately 250 problems from the general problem list of the Blueprint, 134 were assigned to general practice medicine: 89 in view of their high incidence in general practice, 15 because of the emergency nature, since GPs are easily accessible, 12 in which a major disease has to be excluded and 18 regarding chronic conditions. In this way, insight is provided into the matters regarding which medical faculties can address departments of general practice medicine about the curriculum to be drawn up. It appears advisable that other specialisms as well should define their potential contributions to undergraduate medical education and the relevant priorities.

Curriculum↗

[Acute respiratory infection in general clinical practice].

Due to high frequency, certain risk of related complications, absenteeism, direct and indirect costs related to them, acute respiratory infections represent a significant health problem. The aim of the paper is to examine the frequency and characteristics of acute respiratory infections, as well as the characteristics of patients with these infections among the population in care of general practitioners/family physicians. In 11 teaching general practices in Zagreb, data were collected from medical records on patients and acute respiratory infections which the patients developed over the period from October 1, 1994 to September 30, 1995. For statistical data processing description, distribution analysis and chi-square test were used. Out of 17,888 patients in care of general practitioners involved in the study, acute respiratory infections were noticed in 4,114 (22.9%) patients ranging in age from newborn to 97 years out of which 1,473 (35.8%) were males and 2,641 (64.2%) were females. A total of 5,892 acute respiratory infections were observed, in average 1.43 infections per patient, for which the patients visited their general practitioners 11,610 times (1.97 visits per infection). Most of the patients 2,958 (71.9%) attended their general practitioners because of one acute respiratory infection. The initial diagnosis of acute upper respiratory tract infection was registered in 4,601 (78.1%) infections, and final diagnosis in 4,475 (75.9%) infections. The most frequent diagnoses included: pharyngitis and tonsillitis (including streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis), nasopharyngitis, sinusitis and bronchitis. In 4,874 (82.7%) cases, general practitioners based their diagnosis on patient history and clinical examination. Antibiotics were prescribed in 3,892 (66.1%) cases. Out of 42 (1.2%) patients treated in hospital, seven patients were admitted for tuberculosis and two for bronchi cancer detected during the acute respiratory infection. Follow-up was reported in 3,644 (60.3%) cases, and sick leave in 1,236 (31%) cases. The results of this study have shown significantly higher frequency of acute respiratory infections in the morbidity in outpatient health care, and also that management of patients with these diseases is mainly the responsibility of general practitioners. In order to improve professional competence of general practitioner/family physician and quality of work in the management of patients with acute respiratory infections in general practice/family medicine, it is necessary to continuously improve the knowledge on all characteristics of the management of patient with these diseases in general practice, as well as to make a critical assessment of the existing practice.

Acute Disease↗

Trauma calls: role of the general surgeon and CT scanning.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: General surgeons are required in only a minority of trauma call cases to assess for abdominal injuries. Computed tomography (CT) accurately detects blunt abdominal injuries and may have replaced the need for general surgeons at trauma calls. This study evaluated the role of general surgeons at trauma calls and assessed use of CT in cases of suspected abdominal trauma. METHODS: (a) Eighteen month analysis of trauma calls at a district general hospital and (b) three month prospective study of all trauma cases presenting to A&E. RESULTS: (a) There were 73 trauma calls and the mechanism of injury in most cases was a road traffic accident (RTA). Most patients had orthopaedic and/or neurosurgical injuries. The general surgeons assessed 22 trauma call patients. Abdominal injury was excluded in 13 (four by clinical examination and nine following CT). (b) Forty three patients fulfilled the criteria for a trauma call and 14 trauma calls were made. The mechanism of injury in most was RTA and most had orthopaedic and/or neurosurgical injuries. The general surgeons assessed 10/43 potential trauma call patients, and abdominal injury was excluded in five (one by clinical examination and four following CT). CONCLUSION: A&E staff managed most trauma calls. Most patients did not require general surgical intervention. For penetrating injuries, presence of a general surgeon remained crucial. For blunt injuries CT was an important adjunct. These data suggest that general surgeons do not routinely have to attend all trauma calls but can be called if abdominal and/or vascular injuries are specifically suspected.

Abdominal Injuries↗