Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources
PubMed2007

Drug resistance among HIV-infected pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals for prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify primary resistance mutations (PRMs) among HIV-1-infected women receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) for prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from HIV-1-infected women enrolled in a prospective cohort study in Argentina, the Bahamas, Brazil, and Mexico (NISDI Perinatal Study) were assayed for PRMs. Eligible women were those enrolled by March 2005 and diagnosed with HIV-1 infection during the current pregnancy, and who received ART for MTCT prophylaxis and were followed for 6-12 weeks postpartum. RESULTS: Of 819 women, 198 met the eligibility criteria. At enrollment, 98% were asymptomatic, 62% had plasma viral load < 1000 copies/ml, 53% had CD4+ cell count > or = 500 cells/microl, and 78% were ART-exposed (mean duration, 8.0 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 7.1-8.9). The most complex ART regimen during pregnancy was usually (81%) a three-drug regimen [two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) + one protease inhibitor or two NRTIs + one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor). PRMs were observed in samples from 19 (16%) of 118 women that were amplifiable at one or both time points [11/76 (14%) at enrollment; 14/97 (14%) at 6-12 weeks]. The occurrence of PRMs was not associated with clinical, immunological, or virological disease stage at either time point, whether ART-naive versus exposed at enrollment, or the most complex or number of antiretroviral drug regimens received during pregnancy (P > 0.1). Of 55 women with amplifiable samples at both time points, PRMs were detected in 11 samples (20%). CONCLUSIONS: PRMs occurred among 16.1% of relatively healthy HIV-1-infected mothers from Latin American and Caribbean countries receiving MTCT prophylaxis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Brief report: efficacy and treatment-limiting toxicity with the concurrent use of lopinavir/ritonavir and a third protease inhibitor in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of using lopinavir/ritonavir concurrently with a third protease inhibitor (PI), the authors reviewed the medical records of 47 HIV-infected patients treated with antiretroviral regimens containing lopinavir/ritonavir and amprenavir, saquinavir, indinavir, or nelfinavir. The baseline mean HIV RNA level was 4.6 log(10) copies/mL, and the median CD4 cell count was 123/mm3. By week 40, one patient (2%) was lost to follow-up, and 21 (44%) discontinued their lopinavir/ritonavir plus a third PI regimens: 4 (8%) due to virologic failure as determined by the clinician; 13 (28%) due to toxicity; and 4 (8%) due to social reasons. By intent-to-treat analysis, 12 (26%) of 47 patients had an HIV RNA level of less than 400 copies/mL at 40 weeks. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with virologic response were no prior lopinavir exposure (p =.03) and no prior exposure to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors among patients taking a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (p =.05). Some HIV-infected patients concurrently treated with lopinavir/ritonavir and a third PI have viral suppression; many eventually discontinue therapy because of toxicity or virologic failure.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Substitution of nevirapine, efavirenz, or abacavir for protease inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the strategy of substituting nevirapine, efavirenz, or abacavir for a protease inhibitor in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in whom virologic suppression had been achieved. METHODS: We randomly assigned 460 adults who were taking two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and at least one protease inhibitor and whose plasma HIV-1 RNA levels had been less than 200 copies per milliliter for at least the previous six months to switch from the protease inhibitor to nevirapine (155 patients), efavirenz (156), or abacavir (149). The primary end point was death, progression to the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or an increase in HIV-1 RNA levels to 200 copies or more per milliliter. RESULTS: At 12 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of the likelihood of reaching the end point were 10 percent in the nevirapine group, 6 percent in the efavirenz group, and 13 percent in the abacavir group (P=0.10 according to an intention-to-treat analysis). HIV-1 RNA could be amplified in 21 of the 29 patients in whom virologic failure developed during treatment with study medication (72 percent), and resistance mutations to the study medication and to at least one of the nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in the regimen that failed were detected in all but 1 of the 21 patients. Twenty-three of the 29 patients with virologic failure during treatment with study medication had received prior suboptimal therapy with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. Fewer patients in the abacavir group (6 percent) than in the nevirapine group (17 percent) or the efavirenz group (17 percent) discontinued the study medication because of adverse events (P=0.01). The proportion of patients with fasting lipid levels warranting therapeutic intervention decreased significantly in the abacavir group, but the prevalence of clinical lipodystrophy did not change significantly in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: When therapy was switched from a protease inhibitor to nevirapine, efavirenz, or abacavir in patients with virologic suppression, there was a trend toward a higher rate of virologic failure among those given abacavir.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Replication-dependent 65R-->K reversion in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase double mutant K65R + L74V.

Understanding of the mechanisms of interaction among nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-selected mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) coding sequence is essential for the design of newer drugs and for enhancing our vision of the structure function relationship among amino acids of the polymerase domain of HIV-1. Although several nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors select RT mutations K65R and L74V, the combination of 65R + 74V is rare in clinics. A novel NRTI (-)-beta-d-dioxolane-guanosine (DXG) is known to select in vitro either the 65R or 74V mutant virus. These mutations were not selected together during repeated passaging of the HIV-1 in the presence of this drug. To analyze the impact of these RT mutations on viral replication, a double mutant containing K65R + L74V was created by site-directed mutagenesis in a pNL4-3 background. Replication kinetic assays revealed that the mutant K65R + L74V is unstable, and 65R-->K reversion occurs during replication of virus in phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear (PBM) cells in the absence of selection pressure. Replication kinetic assays in MT-2 cells demonstrated that double mutant 65R + 74V is highly attenuated for replication and the initiation of reversion is related to the increase in RT activity. Additionally, the suppression of viral replication in the presence of DXG or under suboptimal human recombinant interleukin-2 leads to minimal or no 65R-->K reversion. These observations provide evidence that 65R-->K reversion in the double mutant 65R + 74V is dependent on a specific rate of viral replication in a pNL4-3 background. A similar phenomenon may occur in vivo, which may have implications for treatment management strategies.

Arginine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Identification of common functional configurations among molecules.

A new algorithm for identifying three-dimensional configurations of chemical features common to a set of molecules is described. The algorithm scores each configuration based both on the degree to which it is common to the input set and its estimated rarity. The algorithm can be applied to molecules with large (several hundred) conformational models. Results from the application of this algorithm to three data sets are discussed: PAF antagonists, HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and HIV protease inhibitors. Of particular interest is a common configuration identified for a set of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors; this configuration is shared by two new, potent inhibitors that were recently described in the literature.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of ritonavir plus saquinavir- and nelfinavir plus saquinavir-containing regimens as salvage therapy in children with human immunodeficiency type 1 infection.

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective study we compared the antiretroviral effect of regimens consisting of simultaneous administration of two protease inhibitors (PI) with at least one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor on plasma viral load (VL) and CD4 cell count in HIV-infected children intensively pretreated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and PIs. METHODS: Eleven HIV-infected children were changed to antiretroviral combination regimens including two PIs and followed for a median time of 24 weeks. Group A comprised six patients who were given ritonavir + saquinavir (SQV) and Group B consists of five patients who were changed to nelfinavir + SQV. Patients were treated with these combinations with 2 PIs because of treatment failure (increasing viral load) of prior PI therapy or clinical signs of disease progression. OUTCOME MEASURES: Serial determinations of plasma viral load (Amplicor, Roche) and CD4 cells were performed every 4 to 8 weeks. The detection limit of the Amplicor-reverse transcriptase-PCR assay was 50 copies/ml (1.7 log10). RESULTS: In Group A the median VL reduction was 1.1 log10 after 3 months and 1.4 log10 after 6 months. In Group B median VL decreased 0.1 and 0.2 log10 after 3 and 6 months. In both groups during the study period none of the patients reached undetectable VL. The relative changes of CD4 cells above baseline in Group A showed a median increase of 7% after 3 months and 23% after 6 months. In Group B after 3 months CD4 cells did not increase, and after 6 months the median relative increase was only 7%. Both combination therapies were well tolerated, not necessitating any drug interruption during study period. CONCLUSIONS: In children with intensive prior antiretroviral treatment, a salvage therapy including two PIs demonstrated antiretroviral efficacy in some patients. In this study the reduction of the VL as well as the increase of CD4 cells was more pronounced with ritonavir + SQV than with nelfinavir + SQV. With both combinations complete suppression of HIV replication was not achieved. Therefore the long term effect of these combinations may be limited by the emergence of resistant HIV strains.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

MRP4: A previously unidentified factor in resistance to nucleoside-based antiviral drugs.

Dideoxynucleosides, which are potent inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase and other viral DNA polymerases, are a common component of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) (ref. 1). Six reverse transcriptase inhibitors have been approved for human use: azidothymidine; 2'3'-dideoxycytidine; 2'3'-dideoxyinosine; 2', 3'-didehydro-3'deoxythymidine; 2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine; and 4-[2-amino-6-(cyclopropylamino)-9H-purin-9-yl]-2-cyclopentene-1-++ +metha nol. Although drug-resistant HIV strains resulting from genetic mutation have emerged in patients treated with HAART (ref. 1), some patients show signs of drug resistance in the absence of drug-resistant viruses. In our study of alternative or additional mechanisms of resistance operating during antiviral therapy, overexpression and amplification of the MRP4 gene correlated with ATP-dependent efflux of PMEA (9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine) and azidothymidine monophosphate from cells and, thus, with resistance to these drugs. Overexpression of MRP4 mRNA and MRP4 protein severely impaired the antiviral efficacy of PMEA, azidothymidine and other nucleoside analogs. Increased resistance to PMEA and amplification of the MRP4 gene correlated with enhanced drug efflux; transfer of chromosome 13 containing the amplified MRP4 gene conferred resistance to PMEA. MRP4 is the first transporter, to our knowledge, directly linked to the efflux of nucleoside monophosphate analogs from mammalian cells.

Adenine↗
PubMed2005

Mechanism for nucleoside analog-mediated abrogation of HIV-1 replication: balance between RNase H activity and nucleotide excision.

Understanding the mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance is critical for developing more effective antiretroviral agents and therapies. Based on our previously described dynamic copy-choice mechanism for retroviral recombination and our observations that nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) increase the frequency of reverse transcriptase template switching, we propose that an equilibrium exists between (i) NRTI incorporation, NRTI excision, and resumption of DNA synthesis and (ii) degradation of the RNA template by RNase H activity, leading to dissociation of the template-primer and abrogation of HIV-1 replication. As predicted by this model, mutations in the RNase H domain that reduced the rate of RNA degradation conferred high-level resistance to 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine and 2,3-didehydro-2,3-dideoxythymidine by as much as 180- and 10-fold, respectively, by increasing the time available for excision of incorporated NRTIs from terminated primers. These results provide insights into the mechanism by which NRTIs inhibit HIV-1 replication and imply that mutations in RNase H could significantly contribute to drug resistance either alone or in combination with NRTI-resistance mutations in reverse transcriptase.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2000

Antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1 infection: established treatment strategies and new therapeutic options.

Recently, studies have shown that non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, such as efavirenz or nevirapine, in combination with two nucleoside analogues have an antiretroviral potency comparable to protease inhibitor containing regimens. Triple combination therapy that includes a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor can therefore be regarded as an effective alternative first-line treatment of HIV-1 infection.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1995

Molecular modeling studies of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase nonnucleoside inhibitors: total energy of complexation as a predictor of drug placement and activity.

Computer modeling studies have been carried out on three nonnucleoside inhibitors complexed with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT), using crystal coordinate data from a subset of the protein surrounding the binding pocket region. Results from the minimizations of solvated complexes of 2-cyclopropyl-4-methyl-5,11-dihydro-5H-dipyrido[3,2-b :2',3'-e][1,4] diazepin-6-one (nevirapine), alpha-anilino-2, 6-dibromophenylacetamide (alpha-APA), and 8-chloro-tetrahydro-imidazo(4,5,1-jk)(1,4)-benzodiazepin-2(1H)-thi one (TIBO) show that all three inhibitors maintain a very similar conformational shape, roughly overlay each other in the binding pocket, and appear to function as pi-electron donors to aromatic side-chain residues surrounding the pocket. However, side-chain residues adapt to each bound inhibitor in a highly specific manner, closing down around the surface of the drug to make tight van der Waals contacts. Consequently, the results from the calculated minimizations reveal that only when the inhibitors are modeled in a site constructed from coordinate data obtained from their particular RT complex can the calculated binding energies be relied upon to predict the correct orientation of the drug in the pocket. In the correct site, these binding energies correlate with EC50 values determined for all three inhibitors in our laboratory. Analysis of the components of the binding energy reveals that, for all three inhibitors, solvation of the drug is endothermic, but solvation of the protein is exothermic, and the sum favors complex formation. In general, the protein is energetically more stable and the drug less stable in their complexes as compared to the reactant conformations. For all three inhibitors, interaction with the protein in the complex is highly favorable. Interactions of the inhibitors with individual residues correlate with crystallographic and site-specific mutational data. pi-Stacking interactions are important in binding and correlate with drug HOMO RHF/6-31G* energies. Modeling results are discussed with respect to the mechanism of complex formation and the design of nonnucleoside inhibitors that will be more effective against mutants of HIV-1 RT that are resistant to the currently available drugs.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2000

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in human immunodeficiency virus infection.

The era of antiviral therapy directed against HIV-1 has now entered its second decade. In the twelve years since the FDA approved the first antiretroviral drug zidovudine there have been a number of seminal developments that have revolutionized the approach to therapy. These advances converged to change the treatment paradigm from one of therapeutic nihilism to that of cautious optimism. First, several trials demonstrated that combination therapy of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is superior to monotherapy in extending survival and delaying disease progression. Second, the concept of virologic latency in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients was revised. Mathematic modelling demonstrated that there is an ongoing high level of virus production driving a rapid turnover of CD4 cells at all stages of infection. Hence it was concluded that the aim of antiretroviral therapy (ART) should be to "hit early and hit hard." Third, significant advances in molecular virology facilitated the development of quantitative methods to measure the circulating HIV plasma RNA. HIV viral load has been shown to be a sensitive predictor of disease progression and a valuable marker of response to therapy. However, none of these developments would have translated into improved patient care without the advent of two new classes of drugs-the protease inhibitors (PIs) and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs).

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1999

Ritonavir and saquinavir combination therapy for the treatment of HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and antiretroviral activity of ritonavir (Norvir) and saquinavir (Invirase) combination therapy in patients with HIV infection. DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. SETTING: Seven HIV research units in the USA and Canada. PATIENTS: A group of 141 adults with HIV infection, CD4 T lymphocyte counts of 100-500 x 10(6) cells/l, whether treated previously or not with reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy, but without previous HIV protease inhibitor drug therapy. INTERVENTIONS: After discontinuation of prior therapy for 2 weeks, group I patients were randomized to receive either combination (A) ritonavir 400 mg and saquinavir 400 mg twice daily or (B) ritonavir 600 mg and saquinavir 400 mg twice daily. After an initial safety assessment of group I patients, group II patients were randomized to receive either (C) ritonavir 400 mg and saquinavir 400 mg three times daily or (D) ritonavir 600 mg and saquinavir 600 mg twice daily. Investigators were allowed to add up to two reverse transcriptase inhibitors (including at least one with which the patient had not been previously treated) to a patient's regimen after week 12 for failure to achieve or maintain an HIV RNA level < or = 200 copies/ml documented on two consecutive occasions. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were measured at baseline, every 2 weeks for 2 months, and monthly thereafter. Safety was assessed through the reporting of adverse events, physical examinations, and the monitoring of routine laboratory tests. RESULTS: The 48 weeks of study treatment was completed by 75% (106/141) of the patients. Over 80% of the patients on treatment at week 48 had an HIV RNA level < or = 200 copies/ml. In addition, intent-to-treat and on-treatment analyses revealed comparable results. Suppression of plasma HIV RNA levels was similar for all treatment arms (mean areas under the curve minus baseline through 48 weeks were-1.9, -2.0, -1.6, -1.8 log10 copies/ml in ritonavir-saquinavir 400-400 mg twice daily, 600-400 mg twice daily, 400-400 mg three times daily, and 600-600 mg twice daily, respectively). Median CD4 T-lymphocyte count rose by 128 x 10(6) cells/l from baseline, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 82-221 x 10(6) cells/l. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, circumoral paresthesia, asthenia, and nausea. Reversible elevation of serum transaminases (> 5 x upper limit of normal) occurred in 10% (14/141) of the patients enrolled in this study and was associated with baseline abnormalities in liver function tests, baseline hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, or hepatitis C antibody positivity (relative risk, 5.0; 95% confidence interval 1.5-16.9). Most moderate or severe elevations in liver function tests occurred in patients treated with ritonavir-saquinavir 600-600 mg twice daily. CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir 400 mg combined with saquinavir 400 mg twice daily with the selective addition of reverse transcriptase inhibitors was the best-tolerated regimen of four dose-ranging regimens and was equally as active as the higher dose combinations in HIV-positive patients without previous protease inhibitor treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Nelfinavir: an update on its use in HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: Nelfinavir is one of several currently available protease inhibitors used to limit viral replication and improve immune function in HIV-infected individuals. It is administered in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Nelfinavir has been evaluated as first-line therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in treatment-naive patients, or as an additional antiretroviral agent in protease inhibitor-naive patients already receiving NRTIs. These studies have shown good efficacy in terms of HIV viral load reduction and increased CD4+ cell counts. When used in combination with NRTIs, nelfinavir 1250 mg twice daily produced similar results to 750 mg 3 times daily. The more convenient twice-daily dosage schedule, which is now approved in the US, may be beneficial in improving patient adherence to therapy. Nelfinavir has also been used successfully in combination with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, with or without NRTIs. Resistance to nelfinavir has been observed in vitro and in clinical isolates from patients experiencing insufficient or waning viral suppression during treatment. Nelfinavir primarily selects for the D30N mutation, which is not seen with other protease inhibitors, and alone does not cause resistance to other protease inhibitors in vitro. Several studies have shown that patients who experience virological failure while receiving nelfinavir can respond to salvage therapy with other protease inhibitors. Diarrhoea is the most frequent adverse event in patients receiving nelfinavir-based combination therapy, but was generally mild and resulted in minimal discontinuation of therapy in clinical trials. Diarrhoea can usually be controlled with drugs that slow gastrointestinal motility. Metabolic disturbances associated with protease inhibitor use (hypercholesterolaemia, hyperglycaemia and lipodystrophy) have also been reported with nelfinavir. Nelfinavir is associated with a number of clinically significant drug interactions and coadministration of some drugs (e.g. astemizole, cisapride, triazolam) is contraindicated. Coadministration of nelfinavir with other protease inhibitors generally resulted in favourable pharmacokinetic interactions (usually increased area under the concentration-time curve for both drugs). CONCLUSION: Nelfinavir, in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, is effective in limiting HIV replication and increasing CD4+ cell counts in HIV-infected adults and children. The convenience of its dosage administration, the low incidence of adverse events, and the potential for salvage therapies indicate that nelfinavir (as part of combined antiretroviral therapy regimens) should be considered as a first-line option in protease inhibitor-naive patients and in those unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

New developments in anti-HIV chemotherapy.

Virtually all the compounds that are currently used, or under advanced clinical trial, for the treatment of HIV infections, belong to one of the following classes: (i) nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs): i.e. zidovudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, stavudine, lamivudine, abacavir, emtricitabine, tenofovir (PMPA) disoproxil fumarate; (ii) non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs): i.e. nevirapine, delavirdine, efavirenz, emivirine; and (iii) protease inhibitors (PIs): i.e. saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, nelfinavir and amprenavir. In addition, various other events in the HIV replicative cycle are potential targets for chemotherapeutic intervention: (i) viral adsorption, through binding to the viral envelope glycoprotein gp120; (ii) viral entry, through blockade of the viral coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5; (iii) virus-cell fusion; (iv) viral assembly and disassembly; (v) proviral DNA integration; (vi) viral mRNA transcription. Also, new NRTIs, NNRTIs and PIs have been developed that possess respectively improved metabolic characteristics, or increased activity against NNRTI-resistant HIV strains or, as in the case of PIs, a different, non-peptidic scaffold. Given the multitude of molecular targets with which anti-HIV agents can interact, one should be cautious in extrapolating from cell-free enzymatic assays to the mode of action of these agents in intact cells.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of an efavirenz-containing regimen: an open-label, multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Efavirenz (EFV) has been shown to be a highly effective HIV therapy in antiretroviral-naïve patients when used with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. METHOD: The study participants were 314 patients, 45 of whom had not been previously treated with any antiretroviral medication. The other patients were heavily pretreated for about 3 years (1,047 days); 34 with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 147 with triple therapy, and 88 with a quadruple regimen. RESULTS: Suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA to <50 copies/mL and <500 copies/mL was achieved in 56% and 72% of the pretreated patients and in 82% and 91% of the naïve patients, respectively, at week 80 (intention-to-treat analysis: noncompleters = failure: 10% and 15% and 20% and 22%, respectively). The viral load reduction at week 80 was 0.7 log(10) for the pretreated patients and 2.6 log(10) for the naïve patients. CD4 cell counts increased from 386 to 474 cells/microL at week 80 in the pretreated group and from 264 to 431 in the naïve patients. 118 patients discontinued the treatment due to adverse events (37 patients due to nervous system symptoms and 15 patients because of exanthema). There were no AIDS-defining events in the group of antiretroviral-treated patients. CONCLUSION: EFV in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as antiretroviral therapy was potent and effective in reducing viral load, mainly in treating therapy-naïve patients and in preventing AIDS-defining events.

Alkynes↗
PubMed2005

[New medical treatment for viral conjunctivitis].

Around one million people in Japan are suffering from adenoviral conjunctivitis every year and it is recognized as one of the major pathogens of nosocomial infection. Several complications, such as corneal erosion and conjunctival pseudomembrane, are observed in some of the cases and corneal sube- pithelial opacity may bring visual impairment. Moreover, no specific anti-adenoviral agent has been discovered and an effective treatment has not been established for adenoviral infection. We have researched new medical treatment for viral conjunctivitis based on recent findings in adenoviral conjunctivitis. Firstly, anti-adenoviral activity was evaluated in vitro in agents which could possibly act as anti-adenoviral drugs. Twelve candidates, such as zalcitabin, interferon beta, etc., were selected among antiviral drugs, adenoviral receptor inhibitors, natural products and anti-inflammatory drugs. Remarkable anti-adenoviral effect was observed in zalcitabin, sanilbudine, interferon beta and anti-osteopontin peptide. Two anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs with anti-adenoviral activity, zalcitabin and sanilbudine, are nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, but, in contrast, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors were ineffective against adenovirus. Interferon beta and anti-osteopontin peptide displayed anti-adenoviral effects by absorption inhibition. Secondly, side effects caused by possible anti-adenoviral eye drops, including cidofovir whose development as eye drops against eyeball and ocular adnexa had been suspended, were analyzed in a white rabbit model. In animals given cidofovir locally, significant narrowing of lacrimal canaliculus, redness of eyelid and conjunctival injection was observed, but obstruction of the lacrimal duct was not found. Although zalcitabin and sanilbudine eye drops induced eyelid redness, no change was observed in the lacrimal route and conjunctiva. In animals treated by cidofovir, inflammation histologically suggesting mainly allergic change was observed. These results indicate that these four drugs are possible candidate for safe eye drops against adenoviral conjunctivitis. These four agents are divided into two categories, inhibitors of adenoviral replication, zalcitabin and sanilbudine; and suppressors of adenoviral infection, interferon beta and anti-osteopontin peptide. It is expected that eye drops for specific treatment of adenoviral conjunctivitis are going to be available in the near future following investigation of therapeutic effect in adenoviral infected animals and clinical trials in humans.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2001

The protease inhibitors.

With the advent of newer antiretroviral agents for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), health care providers are faced with many options to optimize their patients' therapy. Currently, there are three groups of drugs available for the treatment of patients with HIV infection: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (also known as nucleoside analogues), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors (PIs). The preferred initial treatment regimen now consists of two nucleoside analogues and a PI. Protease inhibitors cause profound and sustained suppression of viral replication, increase time to first AIDS-defining illness, and reduce mortality. Each of the available PIs have distinct pharmacokinetic and metabolic properties that result in different dosing regimens and potential for interactions with food and other drugs. Patients with HIV infection typically receive several drugs; therefore, convenience of administration, optimal side-effect profile, and cost of the agents must also be considered along with the potential for drug interactions.A growing proportion of HIV patients worldwide are women. HIV-infected pregnant women should be offered antiretroviral prophylaxis to prevent perinatal HIV transmission as well as to optimize their own health. Zidovudine (ZDV) treatment has been the standard antiretroviral treatment during pregnancy; however, recent data has shown that combination regimens produce a more pronounced antiviral effect and may be more effective than ZDV monotherapy in preventing perinatal HIV transmission.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Cellular pharmacology of D-d4FC, a nucleoside analogue active against drug-resistant HIV.

The backbone of effective highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens for the treatment of HIV infections currently contains at least two nucleosides. Among the features that influence the potency of each component of a regimen and the overall efficacy of the combination are the cellular uptake and bioconversion of nucleoside analogues to their active triphosphate form, and the extent of possible interactions in these steps that might occur when more than one nucleoside is used in a regimen. D-d4FC (Reverset), a new cytidine analogue with the ability to inhibit many nucleoside-resistant viral variants, was examined for these parameters. In phytohemaglutinin-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, D-d4FC was taken up in a rapid (8 h to 50% maximal value), saturable (plateau above 10 microM parent nucleoside concentration) process, resulting in levels of D-d4FC triphosphate that should provide potent antiviral activity against a variety of virus genotypes. Based on measurement of antiviral effects in cell culture, additive and in some cases, synergistic interactions were observed with protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or other nucleosides, including cytidine analogues.

Anti-HIV Agents↗