Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Insurance, Psychiatric”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Psychiatric disorders and asthma outcomes among high-risk inner-city patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of psychiatric disorders among patients attending an ethnically diverse, inner-city asthma clinic for an initial visit and assess the association between psychiatric disorders and asthma morbidity. METHODS: A semistructured psychological interview was conducted to assess for psychiatric diagnoses. A pulmonary physician, who was blind to psychiatric disorder, established diagnosis of asthma based on national guidelines. RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of 85 participants received at least 1 psychiatric diagnosis. The pulmonary physician rated patients with a psychiatric disorder as achieving fewer goals (M = 2.3 +/- 1.3) for asthma control than patients without a psychiatric disorder (M = 3.6 +/- 1.5, p = .0002). Patients with a psychiatric diagnosis more frequently reported an emergency room visit for asthma during the past 6 months (OR = 4.89; 95% CI, 1.76-13.39) and greater use of short-acting beta2-agonist medication (M = 1.5 +/- 0.9 canisters per month) than patients without a psychiatric diagnosis (M = 0.9 +/- 0.8, p = .003). These findings were independent of demographics, health insurance, and asthma severity. No differences emerged between patients with and without a mental disorder on percent predicted FEV1. Patients with a psychiatric disorder reported a higher severity level for asthma symptoms than the severity level indicated by their pulmonary function in comparison to patients without a psychiatric diagnosis (OR = 3.52; 95% CI, 1.23-10.10). Health insurance appeared to be a confounding factor in this relationship. CONCLUSION: A high rate of psychiatric disorders was found among inner-city asthma patients. Psychiatric diagnoses were associated with greater perceived impairment from asthma but not objective measurement of pulmonary function.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Impact of long-term care insurance on institutional dementia care in Japan.

Japan started long-term care insurance for nursing and home help services in April 2000 to cope with growing medical expenditures for the population aged over 65. To study the impact of the new insurance on utilization of dementia care, we compared demographic and clinical characteristics including diagnosis, degree of disability and behavioral disturbance before and after the launch among people with dementia covered by either long-term care or medical insurance. The subjects of the study were randomly selected patients/residents of specialized dementia care units in both psychiatric hospitals and geriatric care facilities before (1145 patients/residents in early 2000) and after (262 for medical insurance and 205 for long-term care insurance in 2001) the new system was launched. Although patients/residents in 2000 and 2001 were similar as a whole, the 2001 sample showed differences between patients in each of the types of insurance systems. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients/residents covered by long-term care insurance were significantly more likely to be females and require higher levels of care. Patients covered by long-term care insurance were significantly less likely to be transferred from a psychiatric department nor did they display behavioral disturbance or an inability to put out or deal with fire. These results suggest that health care facilities have shifted to the new insurance system for patients requiring higher levels of care but without behavioral disturbances as it was intended. On the other hand, there were policy concerns of that demented persons with moderate activities of daily living impairments and behavioral disturbances would be at risk being excluded from the long-term care scheme.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Help seeking for mental health problems among Mexican Americans.

This study uses data from a household survey (Mexican American Prevalence and Services Study; MAPSS) of 3,000 respondents in Fresno County, California, to 1) contrast use across multiple sectors of care among immigrant and U.S. born Mexican Americans with recent psychiatric disorders, 2) contrast multiple provider utilization patterns, and 3) identify specific factors associated with the use of mental health specialty and general medical sectors. Immigrants and U.S. born disproportionately used the general medical sector for treating mental health problems. The U.S. born were more likely to use family physicians and counselors than were immigrants, and neither relied heavily upon informal network providers to treat psychiatric disorders. A comparison of patterns showed that most people with a recent disorder used a combination of providers. The logistic regression analyses showed that knowing where to find a provider increased the likelihood of specialty mental health use by an odds ratio (O.R.) of 4.68. Private insurance increased use of mental health providers, O.R. = 3.76. Public insurance availability did not increase mental health provider use, suggesting that other factors were linked to use of mental health specialty care. Public insurance did increase medical sector care for psychiatric problems, O.R. = 2.57. Poor self-rated mental health status was primarily associated with use of physicians by U.S. born (O.R. = 5.39). Severe mental health impairment increased use of both general medical (O.R. = 5.54) and specialty mental health (O.R. = 5.1) providers. These results point out that eligibility for public insurance is a necessary but not sufficient status to increase mental health sector care among immigrants, and education and more effective referral from other sectors are needed to encourage use of these services.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

Trends in the inpatient care of persons with schizophrenia.

This report analyzes nationally representative data to examine inpatient services provided to persons with schizophrenia. The data are for patients admitted to general hospitals, private psychiatric hospitals, and State and county mental hospitals between 1970 and 1986 (weighted n = 860,637). The proportion of admissions diagnosed as having schizophrenia decreased from 21 percent in 1970 to 16 percent in 1986; this proportion decreased in public general hospitals and increased in private general hospitals. The rate of admissions for schizophrenia decreased in public general hospitals and State and county mental hospitals and increased in private general hospitals. The overall admissions rate decreased for whites with schizophrenia and increased for African-Americans, owing entirely to increased admissions of African-American males. Private general hospitals and State and county mental hospitals relied less over time on private insurance; the use of Medicare increased in both public and private general hospitals; and Medicaid use increased in private general hospitals. Further research on services for this population is necessary as a baseline for health care reform.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

What should non-US behavioral health systems learn from the USA?: US behavior health services trends in the 1980s and 1990s.

Several countries, such as the USA, inadvertently created a different behavioral health payment system from the rest of medicine through the introduction of diagnostic-related group exemptions for psychiatric care. This led to isolation in the administration and delivery of care for patients with mental health and substance abuse disorders from other medical services with significant, yet unintended, consequences. To insure an efficient and effective health-care system, it is necessary to recognize the problems introduced by segregating behavioral health from the rest of medical care. In this review, the authors assess trends in behavioral health services during the last two decades in the USA, a period in which independently managed behavioral health care has dominated administrative practices. During this time, behavioral health has been an easy target for aggressive cost cutting measures. There have been no clinically significant improvements in the number of adults receiving minimally adequate treatment or in the percentage of the population with behavior health problems receiving psychiatric care with the possible exception of depression. While decreased spending for behavioral health services has been well documented during this period, these savings are offset by costs shifted to greater medical service use with a net increase in the total cost of health care. Targeting behavioral health for reduction in health-care spending through independent management, starting with diagnostic procedure code or diagnostic-related group exemption may not be the wisest approach in addressing the increasing fiscal burden that medical care is placing on the national economy.

Behavior Therapy↗
PubMed2007

National estimates of mental health insurance benefits.

This article presents estimates of the proportion of the U.S. population that had mental health benefits in 1999, of the extent of their coverage, and of the proportion that were enrolled in health plans subject to the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 (MHPA). Findings indicate that over three-quarters (76%) of the U.S. population had mental health benefits as part of their health insurance. Approximately 18% of the population had no mental health benefits, and for the remaining 6%, mental health benefits could not be determined. Of the 18% with no mental health benefits, most (84%) had no health insurance whatsoever, while the remainder (16%) had health insurance that did not cover mental health benefits. Estimates of the generosity of coverage indicate that 44% of the population had benefits that included prescription drugs, and that provided at least 30 inpatient days and 20 outpatient visits for psychiatric care. For 12% of the population, benefit generosity could not be determined. Finally, study results suggest that the MHPA affected only 42% of the U.S. population.

Health Care Surveys↗
PubMed2001

[Revolving-door case histories as a special problem in psychiatric care in rural regions - results of an innovative project by Lower Saxony statutory health insurance bodies].

OBJECTIVE: We report on experiences from a programme of the AOK (Local Statutory Health Care Fund) in Lower Saxony adapted to mental health care reality in rural regions. The purpose of the programme is the prevention of rehospitalisation of chronically mental ill and socially handicapped patients. On the advice of hospital-based psychiatrists a case manager of the AOK immediately organises outpatient interventions for patients after discharge from clinical treatment. Primary goals are to reduce psychosocial deficits and to activate supporting potentials in the social environment of the patients in respect of long-term stabilisation. RESULTS: Outpatient interventions have proved to be an efficient instrument to reduce rehospitalisation rates; they enable patients to experience more quality of life and they are of considerable importance in reducing costs for individual treatments. DISCUSSION: If we consider the systematics of hospital bed financing, the reduction of individual treatment costs does not imply reduction of AOK total payments for clinical treatment of mentally ill on a short-term basis. Hence, maintenance of this kind of outpatient treatment is strongly recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A longitudinal perspective on entitlement income among homeless adults.

OBJECTIVE: Sources of entitlement income were examined in a sample of homeless adults to determine whether certain subgroups more consistently obtain entitlement income and are more likely to continue receiving it over time. METHODS: From a baseline sample of 564 homeless residents of Alameda County, California, 397 were interviewed at both five- and 15-month follow-ups. Information was obtained on income received from public sources in the 30 days before each interview, including general assistance, Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC), Supplemental Security Income, or Social Security Disability Insurance. Data were also obtained on psychiatric diagnosis, race, marital status, education, duration of homelessness in adulthood, household status, and reported disability. RESULTS: At baseline fewer than half of the respondents were receiving any entitlement income. The benefits of almost half of the AFDC and general assistance recipients were terminated during the 15-month period. Respondents who continued receiving entitlement income over the 15-month period were more likely to be black, to be women alone or with children, to have a family history of receiving welfare, and to report a disability. Respondents with dual disorders were six times more likely than others to have their benefits terminated. CONCLUSIONS: Entitlement income is tenuous for many homeless adults, particularly those with dual diagnoses.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Falling through the cracks: care of the chronically mentally ill in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

In comparing the development and strength of community-based services for the chronically mentally ill in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom, I analyze how the structure of each country's general medical system has influenced services for the chronically mentally ill and the extent to which more universal medical care systems are associated with stronger community-based systems for the mentally ill. Community-based services are frail and inadequate in all three countries, in each country for different reasons. The specifics of organization of the health care system seem less important in shaping these outcomes than the status of mental health care as a national priority.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Liability insurance.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Alberta↗