Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Histone Modifications”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources

Transcriptional induction of MKP-1 in response to stress is associated with histone H3 phosphorylation-acetylation.

Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP-1) has been shown to play a critical role in mediating the feedback control of MAP kinase cascades in a variety of cellular processes, including proliferation and stress responsiveness. Although MKP-1 expression is induced by a broad array of extracellular stimuli, the mechanisms mediating its induction remain poorly understood. Here we show that MKP-1 mRNA was potently induced by arsenite and ultraviolet light and modestly increased by heat shock and hydrogen peroxide. Interestingly, arsenite also dramatically induces phosphorylation-acetylation of histone H3 at a global level which precedes the induction of MKP-1 mRNA. The transcriptional induction of MKP-1, histone H3 modification, and elevation in MKP-1 mRNA in response to arsenite are all partially prevented by the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor SB203580, suggesting that the p38 pathway is involved in these processes. Finally, analysis of the DNA brought down by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) reveals that arsenite induces phosphorylation-acetylation of histone H3 associated with the MKP-1 gene and enhances binding of RNA polymerase II to MKP-1 chromatin. ChIP assays following exposure to other stress agents reveal various degrees of histone H3 modification at the MKP-1 chromatin. The differential contribution of p38 and ERK MAP kinases in mediating MKP-1 induction by different stress agents further illustrates the complexity and versatility of stress-induced MKP-1 expression. Our results strongly suggest that chromatin remodeling after stress contributes to the transcriptional induction of MKP-1.

Acetylation↗

A haploid affair: core histone transitions during spermatogenesis.

The process of meiosis reduces a diploid cell to four haploid gametes and is accompanied by extensive recombination. Thus, the dynamics of chromatin during meiosis are significantly different than in mitotic cells. As spermatogenesis progresses, there is a widespread reorganization of the haploid genome followed by extensive DNA compaction. It has become increasingly clear that the dynamic composition of chromatin plays a critical role in the activities of enzymes and processes that act upon it. Therefore, an analysis of the role of histone variants and modifications in these processes may shed light upon the mechanisms involved and the control of chromatin structure in general. Histone variants such as histone H3.3, H2AX, and macroH2A appear to play key roles in the various stages of spermiogenesis, in addition to the specifically modulated acetylation of histone H4 (acH4), ubiquitination of histones H2A and H2B (uH2A, uH2B), and phosphorylation of histone H3 (H3p). This review will examine recent discoveries concerning the role of histone modifications and variants during meiosis and spermatogenesis.

Acetylation↗

Nucleotide excision repair from site-specifically platinum-modified nucleosomes.

Nucleotide excision repair is a major cellular defense mechanism against the toxic effects of the anticancer drug cisplatin and other platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents. In this study, mononucleosomes were prepared containing either a site-specific cis-diammineplatinum(II)-DNA intrastrand d(GpG) or a d(GpTpG) cross-link. The ability of the histone core to modulate the excision of these defined platinum adducts was investigated as a model for exploring the cellular response to platinum-DNA adducts in chromatin. Comparison of the extent of repair by mammalian cell extracts of free and nucleosomal DNA containing the same platinum-DNA adduct reveals that the nucleosome significantly inhibits nucleotide excision repair. With the GTG-Pt DNA substrate, the nucleosome inhibits excision to about 10% of the level observed with free DNA, whereas with the less efficient GG-Pt DNA substrate the nucleosome inhibited excision to about 30% of the level observed with free DNA. The effects of post-translational modification of histones on excision of platinum damage from nucleosomes were investigated by comparing native and recombinant nucleosomes containing the same intrastrand d(GpTpG) cross-link. Excision from native nucleosomal DNA is approximately 2-fold higher than the level observed with recombinant material. This result reveals that post-translational modification of histones can modulate nucleotide excision repair from damaged chromatin. The in vitro system established in this study will facilitate the investigation of platinum-DNA damage by DNA repair processes and help elucidate the role of specific post-translational modification in NER of platinum-DNA adducts at the physiologically relevant nucleosome level.

Animals↗

An ERG (ets-related gene)-associated histone methyltransferase interacts with histone deacetylases 1/2 and transcription co-repressors mSin3A/B.

Covalent modifications of histone tails play important roles in gene transcription and silencing. We recently identified an ERG ( ets -related gene)-associated protein with a SET (suppressor of variegation, enhancer of zest and trithorax) domain (ESET) that was found to have the activity of a histone H3-specific methyltransferase. In the present study, we investigated the interaction of ESET with other chromatin remodelling factors. We show that ESET histone methyltransferase associates with histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC2, and that ESET also interacts with the transcription co-repressors mSin3A and mSin3B. Deletion analysis of ESET reveals that an N-terminal region containing a tudor domain is responsible for interaction with mSin3A/B and association with HDAC1/2, and that truncation of ESET enhances its binding to mSin3. When bound to a promoter, ESET represses the transcription of a downstream luciferase reporter gene. This repression by ESET is independent of its histone methyltransferase activity, but correlates with its binding to the mSin3 co-repressors. In addition, the repression can be partially reversed by treatment with the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A. Taken together, these data suggest that ESET histone methyltransferase can form a large, multi-protein complex(es) with mSin3A/B co-repressors and HDAC1/2 that participates in multiple pathways of transcriptional repression.

Animals↗

Genomic characterization reveals a simple histone H4 acetylation code.

The histone code hypothesis holds that covalent posttranslational modifications of histone tails are interpreted by the cell to yield a rich combinatorial transcriptional output. This hypothesis has been the subject of active debate in the literature. Here, we investigated the combinatorial complexity of the acetylation code at the four lysine residues of the histone H4 tail in budding yeast. We constructed yeast strains carrying all 15 possible combinations of mutations among lysines 5, 8, 12, and 16 to arginine in the histone H4 tail, mimicking positively charged, unacetylated lysine states, and characterized the resulting genome-wide changes in gene expression by using DNA microarrays. Only the lysine 16 mutation had specific transcriptional consequences independent of the mutational state of the other lysines (affecting approximately 100 genes). In contrast, for lysines 5, 8, and 12, expression changes were due to nonspecific, cumulative effects seen as increased transcription correlating with an increase in the total number of mutations (affecting approximately 1,200 genes). Thus, acetylation of histone H4 is interpreted by two mechanisms: a specific mechanism for lysine 16 and a nonspecific, cumulative mechanism for lysines 5, 8, and 12.

Acetylation↗

Phosphorylation of histone H3 during transcriptional activation depends on promoter structure.

Covalent modifications of histone N-terminal tails are required for the proper assembly and activation of the general transcription factors at promoters. Here, we analyze histone acetylation and phosphorylation in Drosophila transgenes activated by the yeast Gal4 transcriptional activator in the context of different promoters. We show that, independent of the promoter, transcription does not correlate with acetylation of either H3-Lys 14 or H4-Lys 8. Histone H3 associated with the DNA of Gal4-induced transcribing transgenes driven by the Drosophila Hsp70 promoter is hyperphosphorylated at Ser 10 during transcription. Surprisingly, histone H3 at Gal4-induced transgenes driven by the P element Transposase promoter is not hyperphosphorylated. The data suggest that transcription occurs without acetylated H4 and H3 in both transgenes in Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Instead, phosphorylation of H3 is linked to transcription and can be modulated by the structure of the promoter.

Acetylation↗

RETRACTED: TAF1 activates transcription by phosphorylation of serine 33 in histone H2B.

Dynamic changes in chromatin structure, induced by posttranslational modification of histones, play a fundamental role in regulating eukaryotic transcription. Here we report that histone H2B is phosphorylated at evolutionarily conserved Ser33 (H2B-S33) by the carboxyl-terminal kinase domain (CTK) of the Drosophila TFIID subunit TAF1. Phosphorylation of H2B-S33 at the promoter of the cell cycle regulatory gene string and the segmentation gene giant coincides with transcriptional activation. Elimination of TAF1 CTK activity in Drosophila cells and embryos reduces transcriptional activation and phosphorylation of H2B-S33. These data reveal that H2B-S33 is a physiological substrate for the TAF1 CTK and that H2B-S33 phosphorylation is essential for transcriptional activation events that promote cell cycle progression and development.

Acetylation↗

Transcription by an archaeal RNA polymerase is slowed but not blocked by an archaeal nucleosome.

Archaeal RNA polymerases (RNAPs) are closely related to eukaryotic RNAPs, and in Euryarchaea, genomic DNA is wrapped and compacted by histones into archaeal nucleosomes. In eukaryotes, transcription of DNA bound into nucleosomes is facilitated by histone tail modifications and chromatin remodeling complexes, but archaeal histones do not have histone tails and archaeal genome sequences provide no evidence for archaeal homologs of eukaryotic chromatin remodeling complexes. We have therefore investigated the ability of an archaeal RNAP, purified from Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus, to transcribe DNA bound into an archaeal nucleosome by HMtA2, an archaeal histone from M. thermautotrophicus. To do so, we constructed a template that allows transcript elongation to be separated from transcription initiation, on which archaeal nucleosome assembly is positioned downstream from the site of transcription initiation. At 58 degrees C, in the absence of an archaeal nucleosome, M. thermautotrophicus RNAP transcribed this template DNA at a rate of approximately 20 nucleotides per second. With an archaeal nucleosome present, transcript elongation was slowed but not blocked, with transcription pausing at sites before and within the archaeal nucleosome. With additional HMtA2 binding, complexes were obtained that also incorporated the upstream regulatory region. This inhibited transcription presumably by preventing archaeal TATA-box binding protein, general transcription factor TFB, and RNAP access and thus inhibiting transcription initiation.

Archaeal Proteins↗

Immunofluorescence of histone H1 in stimulated lymphocytes measured by flow cytophotometry.

The modification of histones or their redistribution during the transition from actively transcribing chromatin to the heterochromatic chromosomes seems to play a major in regulation of gene expression. The purpose of this study was to monitor the change in immunofluorescence of histone HI during phytohemagglutinin stimulation in peripheral lymphocytes. The histone antigens were prepared from pig thymus, proven to be pure by gel electrophoresis and repeatedly injected as RNA-complexes into rabbits. The antihistone HI antiserum titer was 1:4000, and there was no cross-reactivity with other histone fractions as shown by microcomplement fixation tests. Affinity chromatography purified antibody after being labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate was able to differentially stain HeLa cells as controls and those, where histone HI had been extracted by perchloric acid treatment. The measurements were done on a Los Alamos Scientific Laboratories-flow cytophotometer cell sorter. Staining peripheral lymphocytes resulted in a bimodal distribution. The increase in number of cells with high fluorescence intensity had its maximum about 20 hr before the maximum proliferative activity of the lymphocytes as measured by number of cells in S phase with the DNA-stain mithramycin.

Cell Cycle↗

Characterization of chromatin-bound erythrocyte histone V (f2c). Synthesis, acetylation, and phosphorylation.

Synthesis and enzymatic modification of histone V was 1 order of magnitude lower in mature gander erythrocytes as compared with immature enriched cells hwich were capable of DNA synthesis. Application of shallow, linear gradient chromatography was used to demonstrate qualitative changes as well. This technique permitted the separation of newly synthesized and phosphorylated histone V from older, less phosphorylated molecules but did not discriminate between acetylated species. The most easily eluted fractions were those most recently synthesized, acetylated, and phosphorylated. While lysine chased into the other subfractions of histone V, phosphate did not, indicating a dephosphorylation step in the immature cells. Acetylation of histone V which occurs at a very low level was closely related to its synthesis. No differences in molecular weights or amino acid compositions were apparent, and behavior on polyacrylamide gels was similar to whole histone V. It is proposed that phosphorylation of histone V may play an important role in the modulation of the effect of histone V in immature cells on condensation and template restriction of chromatin which occurs in the terminal stages of differentiation of the avian erythroid cells.

Acetates↗

[Epigenome and cancer: new possibilities of cancer prevention and therapy?].

In recent years it became evident that epigenetic control of gene expression plays important role in the development of cancer. Epigenetic alterations occur throughout all stages of carcinogenesis, what makes them excellent targets for both chemoprevention and, at later stages, chemotherapy. Two changes integral to epigenetic transcriptional control are DNA methylation and covalent modifications of histone proteins. In cancer cells, genome-wide hypomethylation is accompanied by local DNA hypermethylation with unique patterns exhibited by each tumor type. Hypermethylation of promoter regions of classic tumor suppressor genes in human cancers is at least as common as mutation as a mechanism for their inactivation. The second major layer of epigenetic transcriptional control is modification of histone proteins, particularly their acetylation. These two ways of epigenetic control are integrally linked. In this review we summarize the current knowledge about epigenetic events related to cancer and discuss the possibility of using them as chemotherapy or chemoprevention targets.

Animals↗

Interleukin-12 p40 promoter activity is regulated by the reversible acetylation mediated by HDAC1 and p300.

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a heterodimeric cytokine produced by macrophages in response to intracellular pathogens. The importance of IL-12 in generation of Th1 response against human pathogens has been characterized. The coactivator p300 is an important histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and has been implicated in the regulation of many genes. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) regulate gene transcription through deacetylation of histones. Whether the reversible histone acetylation/deacetylation modification participates in the regulation of IL-12 p40 transcription expression has not been investigated before. In this study, we analyzed the roles of HDAC1 and p300 in the regulation of human IL-12 p40. Co-transfection studies showed that HDAC1 had a repressing effect on the activity of IL-12 p40 promoter. Contrarily, p300 was able to reinforce the C/EBPbeta-mediated activation of IL-12 p40 and it counteracted the HDAC1-mediated repression of the IL-12 promoter. Chromatin immunoprecipitation tests (ChIP) revealed that p300 had a stimulating effect on the acetylation of the histone H3 at IL-12 p40 promoter. In addition, we showed that p300 had a physical interaction with C/EBPbeta and can enhance acetylation of C/EBPbeta. Data presented in this paper indicate that the reversible histone acetylation/deacetylation modification plays an important role in the transcriptional regulation of IL-12.

Acetylation↗

On the Hunt for the Histone Code.

Our genome is not made of naked DNA but a fiber (chromatin) composed of DNA and proteins packaged into our chromosomes. The basic building block of chromatin is the nucleosome, which has two copies of each of the proteins called histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) wrapped by 146 base pairs of DNA. Regions of our genetic material are found between the more open (euchromatin) and more compact (heterochromatin) regions of the genome that can be variably accessible to the underlying genes. Furthermore, post-translational modifications (PTMs) on histones, such as on H3, are critical for regulating chromatin accessibility and gene expression. While site-specific antibodies were the tool of choice for histone PTM analysis in the early days (pre-2000s), enter Don Hunt changing the histone PTM field forever. Don's clever thinking brought new innovative mass spectrometry-based approaches to the epigenetics field. His lab's effort led to the discovery of many new histone modifications and methods to facilitate the detection and quantification of histone PTMs, which are still considered state of the art in the proteomics field today. Due to Don's pioneering work in this area, many labs have been able to jump into the epigenetics field and "Hunt" down their own histone targets. A walkthrough of those early histone years in the Hunt Lab is described by three of us who were fortunate enough to be at the right place, at the right time.

Animals↗

Modification of the lysine residues of histones H1 and H5: effects on structure and on the binding to chromatin.

The extensive modification of histone H1 from calf thymus with the amino-group reagent dimethylmaleic anhydride (over 35 lysine residues modified per molecule) produces no effect on its secondary structure detectable by circular dichroism (far UV). Fluorescence and circular dichroism (near-UV) of the modified histone show variations in the local environment of its sole tyrosine residue. These changes are reversed on regeneration of the modified amino groups. While histone H1 is easily dissociated with this reagent from calf thymus or chicken erythrocyte chromatin, a much stronger treatment is needed to liberate histone H5 from erythrocyte chromatin. This difference appears to be related to the higher arginine content of histone H5.

Animals↗

Histone acetylation/deacetylation and cancer: an "open" and "shut" case?

DNA in eukaryotic cells is packaged into chromatin. The main packaging component of chromatin is the nucleosome, and this is composed of proteins known as histones. Histones can be reversibly modified in several ways, and the best characterized of these modifications is histone acetylation. This is a reversible modification, which is carried out by two families of enzymes, the histone acetyltransferases (HATs), and the histone deacetylases (HDACs). These enzymes have important activities in many cellular processes including transcription, DNA replication and cell cycle progression. The mechanisms underlying tumor formation are multifaceted, and often involve mutations or alterations of genes involved with the regulation and control of the cell cycle or cell death. Because of their important roles in the regulation of such events, enzymes that affect histone acetylation status are increasingly being associated with tumors. This article describes some of the current knowledge about histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases, and how their multitudinal roles in cellular events may have important roles in tumorigensis.

Acetylation↗

Histone Sequence Database: sequences, structures, post-translational modifications and genetic loci.

The Histone Sequence Database is an annotated and searchable collection of all available histone and histone fold sequences and structures. Particular emphasis has been placed on documenting conflicts between similar sequence entries from a number of source databases, conflicts that are not necessarily documented in the source databases themselves. New additions to the database include compilations of post-translational modifications for each of the core and linker histones, as well as genomic information in the form of map loci for the human histone gene complement, with the genetic loci linked to Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). The database is freely accessible through the World Wide Web at either http://genome.nhgri.nih.gov/histones/ or http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/Baxevani/HISTONES

Animals↗

The MYST domain acetyltransferase Chameau functions in epigenetic mechanisms of transcriptional repression.

Reversible acetylation of histone tails plays an important role in chromatin remodelling and regulation of gene activity. While modification by histone acetyltransferase (HAT) is usually linked to transcriptional activation, we provide here evidence for HAT function in several types of epigenetic repression. Chameau (Chm), a new Drosophila member of the MYST HAT family, dominantly suppresses position effect variegation (PEV), is required for the maintenance of Hox gene silencing by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, and can partially substitute for the MYST Sas2 HAT in yeast telomeric position effect (TPE). Finally, we provide in vivo evidence that the acetyltransferase activity of Chm is required in these processes, since a variant protein mutated in the catalytic domain no longer rescues PEV modification, telomeric silencing of SAS2-deficient yeast cells, nor lethality of chm mutant flies. These findings emphasize the role of an acetyltransferase in gene silencing, which supports, according to the histone code hypothesis, that transcription at a particular locus is determined by a precise combination of histone tail modifications rather than by overall acetylation levels.

Acetyltransferases↗

Methylation of histone H4 at arginine 3 occurs in vivo and is mediated by the nuclear receptor coactivator PRMT1.

Posttranslational modifications of histone amino termini play an important role in modulating chromatin structure and function. Lysine methylation of histones has been well documented, and recently this modification has been linked to cellular processes involving gene transcription and heterochromatin assembly. However, the existence of arginine methylation on histones has remained unclear. Recent discoveries of protein arginine methyltransferases, CARM1 and PRMT1, as transcriptional coactivators for nuclear receptors suggest that histones may be physiological targets of these enzymes as part of a poorly defined transcriptional activation pathway. Here we show by using mass spectrometry that histone H4, isolated from asynchronously growing human 293T cells, is methylated at arginine 3 (Arg-3) in vivo. In support, a novel antibody directed against histone H4 methylated at Arg-3 independently demonstrates the in vivo occurrence of this modification and reveals that H4 Arg-3 methylation is highly conserved throughout eukaryotes. Finally, we show that PRMT1 is the major, if not exclusive, H4 Arg-3 methyltransfase in human 293T cells. These findings suggest a role for arginine methylation of histones in the transcription process.

Amino Acid Motifs↗