Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DISINFECTANTS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

In-depth disinfection of acrylic resins.

This study demonstrated that bacteria penetrate three kinds of dental acrylic resin after a short time period. Samples of acrylic resin were contaminated with a variety of bacteria and were then placed in three different disinfecting solutions as directed by the manufacturers. After the specific dilution and immersion time, cultures were made from the resin samples. The only effective disinfectant was a 0.525% solution of sodium hypochlorite at a 10-minute immersion. It disinfected not only the surfaces but also the bacteria that penetrated the surfaces to a depth of 3 mm.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2002

Genotoxic response of Austrian groundwater samples treated under standardized UV (254 nm)--disinfection conditions in a combination of three different bioassays.

Ground water samples from different geographic areas in Austria, with different amounts of natural and anthropogenic organic compounds were treated with a standardized low pressure UV (254 nm)-irradiation laboratory flow-through system (UV fluence: 800 J/m2). The genotoxic activities of the water samples before and after the UV disinfection were investigated using a combination of three different bioassays which complement each other with regard to their sensitivity detecting different genotoxins. The test battery comprises the Salmonella/microsome assay (Ames test with TA98. TA 100 and TA 102, with and without S9 mix) and two micronucleus tests with the plant Tradescantia (clone #4430) and with primary rat hepatocytes. Overall, the tested Austrian groundwater samples used for human consumption caused only weak genotoxic activities compared to drinking water samples reported from other countries under similar experimental conditions. With the exception of one weak positive result in the Ames test (only in strain TA98 without S9 mix) with an induction factor of 1.9) all samples after UV disinfection were devoid of additional mutagenic and clastogenic activities compared to the samples before UV disinfection.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Ozonation of drinking water: part II. Disinfection and by-product formation in presence of bromide, iodide or chlorine.

Ozone is an excellent disinfectant and can even be used to inactivate microorganisms such as protozoa which are very resistant to conventional disinfectants. Proper rate constants for the inactivation of microorganisms are only available for six species (E. coli, Bacillus subtilis spores, Rotavirus, Giardia lamblia cysts, Giardia muris cysts, Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts). The apparent activation energy for the inactivation of bacteria is in the same order as most chemical reactions (35-50 kJ mol(-1)), whereas it is much higher for the inactivation of protozoa (80 kJ mol(-1)). This requires significantly higher ozone exposures at low temperatures to get a similar inactivation for protozoa. Even for the inactivation of resistant microorganisms, OH radicals only play a minor role. Numerous organic and inorganic ozonation disinfection/oxidation by-products have been identified. The by-product of main concern is bromate, which is formed in bromide-containing waters. A low drinking water standard of 10 microg l(-1) has been set for bromate. Therefore, disinfection and oxidation processes have to be evaluated to fulfil these criteria. In certain cases, when bromide concentrations are above about 50 microg l(-1), it may be necessary to use control measures to lower bromate formation (lowering of pH, ammonia addition). Iodate is the main by-product formed during ozonation of iodide-containing waters. The reactions involved are direct ozone oxidations. Iodate is considered non-problematic because it is transformed back to iodide endogenically. Chloride cannot be oxidized during ozonation processes under drinking water conditions. Chlorate is only formed if a preoxidation by chlorine and/or chlorine dioxide has occurred.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Formation of aldehydes upon ClO2 disinfection.

Carbonyl compounds are considered to be the most common ozonation by-products. Apart from well-known chlorites and chlorates, chlorine dioxide (ClO(2)) also generates organic by-products. The goal of this paper is an investigation into the influence of disinfection with ClO(2) on the aldehydes formation. Three types of waters were disinfected with different doses of ClO(2) at the various pH values. The results of size exclusion chromatography show that the reaction of ClO(2) with humic fraction of natural organic matter proceeds mainly on an aromatic part of the molecules. The results obtained indicate that the level of carbonyls concentration can significantly increase with the time of ClO(2) reaction with carbonyl precursors in treated water. There is no noticeable correlation between quantity of aldehydes and pH value of disinfected water. The range of "productivity" of aldehydes in water treated with chlorine dioxide is similar to the range estimated for the carbonyls formed upon ozonation.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed2003

Wastewater disinfection with PAA and UV combined treatment: a pilot plant study.

This study is part of a larger research project on Advanced Treatments for wastewater reuse in agriculture. Because of Italy's strict microbiological limits on unrestricted wastewater reuse in agriculture (2 MPN/100ml Total Coliforms), a very high degree of disinfection is necessary. The objective of this study is to proceed in validating, with a pilot plant experimentation, previous laboratory results on the disinfection efficacy of the synergic combined treatment between ultraviolet irradiation (UV) and peracetic acid (PAA). The research has been carried out through a 5 month on-site experimental study in a pilot plant, considering four different solutions: PAA addition, UV irradiation, addition of PAA upstream the UV device (PAA+UV) and addition of PAA downstream the UV device (UV+PAA). In the investigated experimental conditions (2-8 ppm of PAA with 10-30 min contact time; 100-300 mJ/cm(2) UV), it has been impossible to meet the microbiological limits through an exclusive use of UV irradiation or PAA. The disinfection efficacy enhances by using the UV+PAA treatment, but a much higher efficacy gain occurs by using the PAA+UV treatment. In this latter case, the higher efficiency is recognized as being brought about by the formation of free radicals due to the photolysis of the PAA when in presence of the UV rays. A preliminary cost analysis has been carried out in order to highlight the more economically advantageous solution which guarantees compliance to the strict limits.

Agriculture↗
PubMed2003

Disinfection of surfaces by photocatalytic oxidation with titanium dioxide and UVA light.

Particularly in microbiological laboratories and areas in intensive medical use, regular and thorough disinfection of surfaces is required in order to reduce the numbers of bacteria and to prevent bacterial transmission. The conventional methods of disinfection with wiping are not effective in the longer term, cannot be standardized, are time- and staff-intensive and use aggressive chemicals. Disinfection with hard ultraviolet C (UVC) light is usually not satisfactory, as the depth of penetration is inadequate and there are occupational medicine risks. Photocatalytic oxidation on surfaces coated with titanium dioxide (TiO2) might offer a possible alternative. In the presence of water and oxygen, highly reactive OH-radicals are generated by TiO2 and mild ultraviolet A (UVA). These radicals are able to destroy bacteria, and may therefore be effective in reducing bacterial contamination. Direct irradiation with UVC however can produce areas of shadow in which bacteria are not inactivated. Using targeted light guidance and a light-guiding sheet (out of a UVA-transmittant, Plexiglas, for example), as in the method described in the present study, bacterial inactivation over the entire area is possible. The effectiveness of the method was demonstrated using bacteria relevant to hygiene such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium. For these bacteria, a reduction efficiency (RE) more than 6log10 steps in 60 min was observed. Using Candida albicans, a RE of 2log10 steps in 60 min was seen. Light and scanning electron microscopic examinations suggest that the germ destruction achieved takes place through direct damage to cell walls caused by OH-radicals.

Bacteria↗
PubMed2000

The permeability of dental procedure and examination gloves by an alcohol based disinfectant.

OBJECTIVES: The usage of gloves in dentistry has increased greatly over the last 10 years and this has highlighted certain problems when gloves are being worn extensively. While skin irritations and allergies caused by latex proteins and accelerators have been the main focus of attention, dental materials such as disinfectants have also become known as a source of skin reactions. This study was performed to evaluate the permeability of various gloves by ethanol. METHODS: The tip of the middle finger of 13 glove brands (natural latex gloves (NLG) powdered or unpowdered, powdered vinyl, nitrile and synthetic elastomer) was exposed to 5 ml of a hand disinfectant (Desderman). After a penetration time ranging from 2 min to 8 h the permeation of Desderman was detected with a gas chromatograph. RESULTS: Only one component of the disinfectant (ethanol) could be detected to have gone through the gloves. After only 2 min the vinyl and one nitrile glove and after 10 min all glove types were permeated. Powder seemed to have no real influence on the penetration of ethanol. Some natural latex gloves showed a low rate of leakage, while vinyl and nitrile gloves were penetrated quickly and to a great extent. The synthetic elastomer (Biogel Neotech) was the only one with a significantly lower penetration even after 2-8 h. SIGNIFICANCE: While there are reports of adverse skin reactions to alcohol the amount of ethanol (up to 40 microliters after 2 h) detected in this study is much too low to cause irritations and certainly not toxicity, but it could possibly initiate allergic reactions.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1980

Antibiotic-sensitive Serratia marcescens infections complicating cardiopulmonary operations: contaminated disinfectant as a reservoir.

A cluster of Serratia marcescens infections complicating cardiopulmonary bypass operations was traced to contaminated quaternary ammonium disinfectant. Failure of hospital personnel to clean the disinfectant spray bottles before refilling them had enabled the organisms to survive and contaminate the environment, including the extracorporeal circulator. The organisms grew in two of four formulations of quaternary ammonium disinfectant. Serratia sensitivity to ampicillin and tetracycline was an epidemiological marker of a common-source outbreak.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Solar disinfection of drinking water and diarrhoea in Maasai children: a controlled field trial.

BACKGROUND: Solar radiation reduces the bacterial content of water, and may therefore offer a method for disinfection of drinking water that requires few resources and no expertise. METHODS: We distributed plastic water bottles to 206 Maasai children aged 5-16 years whose drinking water was contaminated with faecal coliform bacteria. Children were instructed to fill the bottle with water and leave it in full sunlight on the roof of the hut (solar group), or to keep their filled bottles indoors in the shade (control group). A Maasai-speaking fieldworker who lived in the community interviewed the mother of each child once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Occurrence and severity of diarrhoea was recorded at each follow-up visit. FINDINGS: Among the 108 children in households allocated solar treatment, diarrhoea was reported in 439 of the 2-week reporting periods during the 12-week trial (average 4.1 [SD 1.2] per child). By comparison, the 98 children in the control households reported diarrhoea during 444 2-week reporting periods (average 4.5 [1.2] per child). Diarrhoea severe enough to prevent performance of duties occurred during 186 reporting periods in the solar group and during 222 periods in the control group (average 1.7 [1.2] vs 2.3 [1.4]). After adjustment for age, solar treatment of drinking water was associated with a reduction in all diarrhoea episodes (odds ratio 0.66 [0.50-0.87]) and in episodes of severe diarrhoea (0.65 [0.50-0.86]). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that solar disinfection of water may significantly reduce morbidity in communities with no other means of disinfection of drinking water, because of lack of resources or in the event of a disaster.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

The effect of currently available contact lens disinfection systems on Acanthamoeba castellanii and Acanthamoeba polyphaga.

Contact lens disinfection systems were evaluated for their effectiveness in killing Acanthamoeba castellanii and Acanthamoeba polyphaga trophozoites and cysts. Amoebae were inoculated into commercially available contact lens cleaning and soaking solutions. At intervals varying from 30 minutes to 24 hours, solutions were filtered. The filters were removed and cultured for Acanthamoeba organisms. Striking differences were observed in the abilities of the different disinfecting solutions to kill the organisms. Solutions containing chlorhexidine were effective at very short exposure times. Solutions containing benzalkonium chloride required slightly longer exposure times but were faster than solutions containing only thimerosal. Solutions containing sorbate, polyaminopropyl biguanide, or polyquaternium-1 were not effective at killing Acanthamoeba organisms in the time allotted for the experiment. Solutions containing hydrogen peroxide were quite effective if the agent was not prematurely catalyzed. A. polyphaga generally required longer exposure to disinfectants than did A. castellanii for complete inhibition to occur.

Acanthamoeba↗
PubMed1998

Antiseptics and disinfectants.

Germicidal agents used as antiseptics and disinfectants play an important role in the control of infection in the veterinary patient. Critical to the proper use of germicidal agents in or around the veterinary patient is knowledge of efficacy and contraindications. The key to proper use of antiseptics and disinfectants is using the proper germicidal agent under conditions that maximize success and minimize complications. Although there are a number of germicidal agents commercially available, effective antisepsis and disinfection can be achieved through use of a few effective, yet safe germicides.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

In-use evaluation of Perasafe compared with Cidex in fibreoptic bronchoscope disinfection.

The mycobactericidal activity of Perasafe (0.26% peracetic acid) was compared with that of Cidex (2% alkaline glutaraldehyde) by an in-use test. Fibreoptic bronchoscopes were artificially contaminated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare in sputum and, after manual pre-cleaning with a neutral soap, 10 and 20 min disinfection periods were tested. Perasafe was as effective as Cidex, thus requiring a 10 min disinfection period against M. tuberculosis and 20 min against M. avium-intracellulare. The results demonstrate that Perasafe is an effective disinfectant for use in reprocessing fibreoptic bronchoscopes.

Bronchoscopes↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of Acinetobacter baumannii susceptibility to antiseptics and disinfectants.

Disinfection and antisepsis are of primary importance in controlling outbreaks of Acinetobacter baumannii, a nosocomial pathogen that frequently shows multiple antibiotic resistance. In this study we assessed the susceptibility of nine A. baumannii strains isolated during a sustained intensive care unit outbreak, to several antiseptics and disinfectants based on European Standards. While the tested strains showed diverse antibiotic resistance patterns, they were equally sensitive to the biocides assessed in vitro. We observed neither evidence of development of resistance to biocides over time, nor a correlation between resistance to antibiotics and a decreased susceptibility to antiseptics or disinfectants.

Acinetobacter Infections↗
PubMed1997

Evaluation of the efficacy of a 3.2% glutaraldehyde product for disinfection of fibreoptic endoscopes with an automatic machine.

The efficacy of 'Cidex Plus' 3.2% alkaline glutaraldehyde was evaluated for the disinfection of fibreoptic endoscopes. The glutaraldehyde concentration in 'Cidex Plus', stored in an automatic machine (Olympus EW-20), remained higher than 2% (2.21%) even after a total of 102 disinfection cycles during 28 consecutive days. The results of the in-vitro study on antimicrobial activity showed that this alkaline glutaraldehyde product had a greater activity against 20 test organisms, including vegetative bacteria, bacterial spores, mycobacteria, and fungi, than 2% glutaraldehyde alone. The presence of 10 or 30% human serum did not appear to affect the activity of glutaraldehyde adversely. Instrument samples made from a variety of materials such as stainless steel, glass, teflon, etc. were not damaged after 168 h of immersion in alkaline glutaraldehyde, although it contained approximately 1.7 times more glutaraldehyde than 2% glutaraldehyde alone. Based on these results, 3.2% alkaline glutaraldehyde is considered to be a more effective disinfectant for fibreoptic endoscopes, with the use of an automatic machine, than 2% glutaraldehyde.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗
PubMed1999

Mycobactericidal activity of selected disinfectants using a quantitative suspension test.

In this study, a quantitative suspension test carried out under both clean and dirty conditions was used to assess the activity of various instrument and environmental disinfectants against the type strain NCTC 946 and an endoscope washer disinfector isolate of Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium fortuitum NCTC 10,394, Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37 Rv NCTC 7416 and a clinical isolate of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (MAI). The disinfectants tested were; a chlorine releasing agent, sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) at 1000 ppm and 10,000 ppm av Cl; chlorine dioxide at 1100 ppm av ClO2 (Tristel, MediChem International Limited); 70% industrial methylated spirits (IMS); 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde (Asep, Galan); 10% succinedialdehyde and formaldehyde mixture (Gigasept, Schulke & Mayr); 0.35% peracetic acid (NuCidex, Johnson & Johnson); and a peroxygen compound at 1% and 3% (Virkon, Antec International). Results showed that the clinical isolate of MAI was much more resistant than M. tuberculosis to all the disinfectants, while the type strains of M. chelonae and M. fortuitum were far more sensitive. The washer disinfector isolate of M. chelonae was extremely resistant to 2% alkaline activated glutaraldehyde and appeared to be slightly more resistant than the type strain to Nu-Cidex, Gigasept, Virkon and the lower concentration of NaDCC. This study has shown peracetic acid (Nu-Cidex), chlorine dioxide (Tristel), alcohol (IMS) and high concentrations of a chlorine releasing agent (NaDCC) are rapidly mycobactericidal. Glutaraldehyde, although effective, is a slow mycobactericide. Gigasept and Virkon are poor mycobactericidal agents and are not therefore recommended for instruments or spillage if mycobacteria are likely to be present.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed1999

Choosing disinfectants.

Disinfectant choice is an important part of the role of the infection control team. Its importance has increased due to concern over transmission of blood-borne viruses and the need to identify alternatives to gluteraldehyde. Factors to be taken into account when choosing disinfectants include compliance with COSHH regulations, user acceptability, instrument compatibility and antimicrobial activity. Compounds vary in their suitability for different uses and an agent's properties must be fully evaluated before adopting it for a particular purpose. This review outlines the main properties that need to be established and covers the major characteristics of main classes of disinfectants.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed1989

Evaluation of a new disinfectant for dialyzer reuse.

Glutaraldehyde has been proposed to be as effective as formaldehyde as a disinfectant for reprocessing capillary hemodialyzers. Formaldehyde has become the standard to which all disinfectants are compared. The two products are compared for microbiological efficacy, reuse, membrane integrity, biocompatibility, performance, residual binding and ease of removal, environmental hazards, and immunogenicity. Glutaraldehyde (0.8%) is as effective as 4% formaldehyde in its microbiocidal effect. The disinfectants are comparable except in the following areas: the use of glutaraldehyde leads to lower reuse rates than formaldehyde, significantly less glutaraldehyde than formaldehyde remains in the dialyzer following standard predialysis rinse procedures, and less glutaraldehyde than formaldehyde is found in environmental air.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed2003

The efficacy of a toothbrush disinfectant spray--an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: Toothbrushes are contaminated by micro-organisms which may be sources of infection, re-infection or cross infection. The object of this research is to test the efficacy of a proprietary toothbrush spray disinfectant (Brushtox) against specific test bacteria and fungi and to consider its potential. METHODS: Three bacteria and two fungi representing a broad microbial spectrum with relevance to oral bacteria were used in four laboratory tests including an in vitro toothbrush disinfection test. RESULTS: Brushtox proved to be almost 100% effective in three tests and showed significant inhibitory action in the standard agar diffusion test. CONCLUSION: Brushtox is an effective disinfectant agent for bacteria and fungi on toothbrushes. The solution may be valuable in the control of a wide variety of oral infections and secondary infections, especially in frail or debilitated individuals or those on immuno-suppressive therapy, and also in healthy individuals.

Aerosols↗