Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “DERMATITIS, CONTACT”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources

[Allergic contact dermatitis due to prednicarbate].

Two female patients developed an allergic contact dermatitis after using Dermatop cream and -ointment for several weeks. Patch tests were positive with the reagent prednicarbate itself. No cross reactions to other glucocorticosteroids were observed. Type-IV-sensitization to glucocorticosteroids should be considered if chronic dermatitis does not improve, or even becomes worse, in spite of adequate therapy. With regard to possible cross reactions or multiple sensitization, epicutaneous tests with other glucocorticosteroids are necessary.

Adolescent↗

Susceptibility and amplification of sensitivity in contact dermatitis.

We have examined the hypothesis that people who develop contact allergies to environmental substances do so because they have heightened susceptibility. Analysis of data from 2200 consecutive patients tested with the 20 commonest antigens in a patch-test clinic showed that more people developed multiple contact allergies than would be predicted from the frequency of single allergies; the excess was too great to be explained by chance and increased with number and rarity of the combinations of sensitizers. The possibility that this was due to enhanced individual susceptibility to sensitization rather than concomitant exposure to several sensitizers was confirmed by showing that patients with multiple allergies are more readily sensitized experimentally, and to a greater degree than normal, by dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), an unrelated antigen. The defect involves induction rather than expression of sensitivity. Amplification of the response to DNCB is proportional to susceptibility (calculated from the ratio of observed prevalence of multiple allergies to that predicted from the prevalence of single allergies) throughout the range from normal subjects, through those with a single sensitivity, to those with rare, multiple allergies. Therefore, we conclude that individual susceptibility is an important factor in the development of contact dermatitis, and occurs by a non-antigen-specific amplification of immune sensitization.

Adult↗

Phenotypic characterization in situ of inflammatory cells in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in man.

The cellular response in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis was analysed in situ with an immunohistochemical double staining technique. Allergic patch test reactions were elicited in 10 patients and irritant reactions in eight cases, using the Finn chamber technique. Skin biopsies were obtained 6-72 h after test applications. Frozen sections of 43 biopsies were investigated by simultaneous staining with rabbit anti-HLA-DR antibodies and various mouse monoclonal antibodies. The cell infiltrates were usually larger in the allergic than in the irritant reactions. However, the kinetics of the cell responses, the phenotypes of the inflammatory cells, their distribution and spatial relationships were similar. It thus appears that the applications of allergens or irritants to the skin generates a cell pattern that to a large extent reflects an immunological readiness for further immune reactions.

Adult↗

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by olive wood jewelry.

A case of allergic contact dermatitis to olive wood occurred. To our knowledge, this is the first such case reported. The diagnosis was confirmed by positive patch tests to scrapings from olive wood and to the quinone compound fractions isolated from an extract of olive wood by thin-layer chromatography. The sensitizing properties of olive wood were proved by experimental sensitization of two guinea pigs that reacted positively to a raw extract an to the fractionated quinone compounds from olive wood after sensitization. The chemical analysis made has shown, for the first time, that olive wood contains quinoid compounds belonging to the same group as the strong sensitizers desoxylapachol from teakwood and the dalbergiones from Brazilian and East Indian rosewood. However, compared with teakwood and rosewood, olive wood can only be considered a relatively weak sensitizer.

Dermatitis, Contact↗

Contact dermatitis due to Alstroemeria (Peruvian lily).

Two cases of hand dermatitis due to contact with the plant Alstroemeria (Peruvian Lily) are recorded. This plant has been increasingly used for making floral decorations during the last decade. As it is available throughout the year in Victoria more cases are likely to be discovered in the community.

Adult↗

Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in rinse-off products causes allergic contact dermatitis: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of sensitivity to the cosmetic preservative methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) has increased significantly in Europe. Most cases of allergic contact dermatitis from MDBGN are caused by leave-on cosmetic products. The risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis from rinse-off products has been less studied. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the allergic response elicited in presensitized individuals from exposure to a rinse-off product preserved with the maximum permitted level of MDBGN. METHODS: Nineteen contact allergic individuals and nine controls participated in a double-blind, randomized repeated open application test (ROAT) using two coded liquid soaps with and without MDBGN. Areas of 50 cm2 on the lower arms were washed with the soaps twice a day for up to 28 days; two of the subjects continued for 34 days. The subjects were also patch tested with a dilution series of MDBGN to determine their patch test threshold values. RESULTS: Seven presensitized individuals (37%) developed allergic contact dermatitis from the soap containing MDBGN. The mean dose of MDBGN per application was 2.2 micro g cm-2 and the reactions appeared between days 6 and 34. All nine controls had negative ROATs. The difference in reactivity between test subjects and controls was significant (one-sided Fisher's exact test, P = 0.04). Patch test threshold values ranged from < 0.001% to 0.2% MDBGN in ethanol/water. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the exposure to a rinse-off product containing the maximum permitted level of MDBGN can easily elicit an allergic response in presensitized individuals. Along with reported cases of induction and elicitation caused by MDBGN in rinse-off products the study indicates that the permitted level of MDBGN in rinse-off products is too high. We recommend that this level should be re-evaluated.

Adult↗

[History of contact dermatitis and its influence on today's occupational dermatology].

Intolerance to individual substances was first described by Bateman 1817. The modern concept of allergic contact dermatitis was based on studies by Block, who also introduced the diagnostic patch testing 1910. Clinical studies in the 1930's established the frequency of allergic contact dermatitis and the common sensitizers. Irritant dermatitis was not understood until the last decades. The occupational dermatoses were largely neglected until the introduction of social security in 1912. Later many studies have been devoted to this field. Most important in the preventive work has been the establishment of sub-specialized departments of occupational dermatology.

Dermatitis, Contact↗

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man.

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a common skin disease, especially in the workplace, but determining the recovery time of chronic ICD is not easy. To measure the recovery time of chronic ICD, we examined the skin reactivity to a model surfactant, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), on previous chronic ICD and normal sites by visual grade and non-invasive instruments. Chronic ICD was induced on the forearms of 10 volunteers (aged 23 to 43 years) by occluded application of 1% SLS for 30 min on 5 consecutive days each week for 3 weeks. Previous ICD and normal sites were provoked by the occluded application of 7.5% SLS for 30 min daily on 4 consecutive days, 2, 5 and 10 weeks after induction. Skin reactivity was assessed daily by awarding visual erythema scores, visual scale scores and measuring transepidermal water loss, skin color reflectance, and electrical capacitance. Skin reactivity of previous chronic ICD sites to SLS showed hyperreactivity compared to normal sites even after the 10th week post-induction.

Adult↗

Allergic airborne contact dermatitis from essential oils used in aromatherapy.

Contact allergy to various essential oils used in aromatherapy was demonstrated on patch testing in a 53-year-old patient suffering from relapsing eczema resistant to therapy on various uncovered parts of the skin, in particular the scalp, neck and hands. Sensitization was due to previous exposure to lavender, jasmine and rosewood. Laurel, eucalyptus and pomerance also produced positive tests, although there was no hint of previous exposure. A diagnosis of allergic airborne contact dermatitis was thus established. On topical and systemic glucocorticoid treatment (peroral methylprednisolone at an initial dose of 60 mg/day) the skin lesions eventually resolved. Due to persistence of the volatile essential oils in the patient's home after a year-long use of aroma lamps, complete renewal of the interior of the patient's flat was considered essential. Due to changing self-medication habits, with increasing orientation to 'natural' modes of treatment, increasing numbers of such sensitizations might be on the horizon.

Air Pollutants↗

Contact dermatitis to temporary tattoo.

The development of contact hypersensitivity to temporary tattoos has been on an increase all over the world. Skin painting with henna is a traditional practice in the Moslems and Hindu, and has recently been increasingly used in western countries. Black henna is obtained by adding paraphenylenediamine to the natural occurring henna. The risk of sensitization increases with the length of contact and increase of the concentration. A case is presented of an 11-year-old boy who developed a severe reaction in the form of redness and edema accompanied by pruritus on the day following the application of a temporary tattoo. A year before, the patient had also developed a skin reaction following temporary tattooing, which had not been recognized as a contact dermatitis. Patch testing was positive for paraphenylenediamine and thiuram compounds. The patient was treated with medium-strength corticosteroids.

Child↗

Contact dermatitis in hairdressers' clients.

The aim of our study was to report the frequency of sensitization to hairdressing allergens in a group of patients with contact dermatitis, in whom previous treatments with hair dyes or permanent wave solutions were suspected to be the cause. 49 of 261 hairdressers' clients (18.7%), who were patch tested with the hairdressers' screening series in the years 1985-1990, showed one (27) or more (22) positive reactions to hairdressing chemicals. This study confirms hair dyeing to be the procedure associated with the highest risk of sensitization among hairdressers' clients. Among hair dye allergens, PPD is the most frequent sensitizer (7.3%). A low rate of sensitization to the PPD derivatives PAP, ONPPD and PTD was detected in these clients, there being no differences in the frequency of sensitization to the 3 substances (4.2%, 4.6% and 4.6%, respectively). Only 0.4% of clients were positive to resorcinol, while pyrogallol showed a 2.3% rate of sensitization. Sensitization to GMTG was found in 3.3% of patients. ATG was an infrequent sensitizer (1.1%). Allergic contact dermatitis due to APS is quite rare (2.7%), in view of the widespread use of this compound. A positive open patch test in 1 hairdressers' client, who complained of generalized urticaria after hair bleaching, confirmed the diagnosis of immediate contact reaction due to APS. Sensitization to hairdressing allergens among consumers (18.7%) is possibly more frequent than sensitization to other cosmetic ingredients. We previously detected a 14.3% rate of sensitization to cosmetic ingredients in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis caused by cosmetics. On the other hand, reactions to cosmetic ingredients were also common in our patients. This may indicate that hairdressers' clients make greater use of cosmetics than average.

Adolescent↗

Contact dermatitis in Israeli soldiers.

This report consists of an evaluation of 41 soldiers from the infantry, armored, and artillery division, who developed hand dermatitis from their contact with oils and fuel. A special "tailored" supplementary tray with five reagents relevant to their field of work and environment was performed. The reagents that were used were gun oil, hydraulic oil, automotive lubricant (oil) 20/50, white spirit, and car petrol (gasoline). Seven of the 41 patients (17%) showed one or more positive tests to the supplementary tray. The fact that none of the control group of 64 patients not exposed to these substances showed a positive result to the supplementary tray indicates that false positive results are, at least, not probable. It is suggested that soldiers with occupational hand dermatitis should be tested with supplemental aimed trays that are relevant to their work and environment, in addition to the standard trays.

Dermatitis, Contact↗

[Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Geneva (1,000 cases) (author's transl)].

Results concerning 1,000 cases of contact dermatitis with positive patch-tests are published and commented. The allergens which are responsible for about 50% of our cases are: turpentine, nickel, hexavalent chromium and mercuri-organic compounds. These results are compared with those of other countries. As in the industrial world there should be information given to the general public to decrease the cases of contact dermatitis.

Chromium↗