Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Civilization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,153 records · Page 64Linked to original sources

Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years: police power and civil liberties in tension.

A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public's health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson's basic tension between individual liberty and the common good. In affirming Massachusetts' compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected. If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ--to account for developments in constitutional law--but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public's health.

Civil Rights↗

AIDS, the law and civil liberties.

In dealing with HIV infection and AIDS, the law must balance the public health interests of the community against the potentially conflicting rights of individuals to liberty and privacy. This article reviews public health legislation currently in force in Australian States and Territories, discusses the potential for coercive strategies to be applied to AIDS sufferers and persons who are or who are presumed to be infected with HIV, and considers how to deal with HIV-infected persons who knowingly or recklessly spread the virus. It is possible that strong measures to control the spread of HIV may be counterproductive because they discourage the cooperation of infected persons and groups at high risk of infection. Although the potential for restrictive practices is great, the law must make, and in Australia has made, some compromises in the interests of the individual and the larger community.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗